Can we all just agree that it is Boyton's fault that Trump got elected? He is better for the country than Hillary would have been so I will offer my Thanks to our Brother From Boyton! THANKS! Looking forward to my tax cuts! You may want to lay low dude there are some libs that are not happy about the outcome of the election you influenced!

Your opinion is worthless to me because you zero in on semantics instead of addressing my point like a coward.

The above is why Trump won.

So, how liberals behave drives the outcomes of elections?

I do think, and as BIGV explained in his response, that did happen in this particular election.

A lot of those who did vote for Trump cast an "in spite of" vote. You can see by the way that Boyton has behaved in this thread how that could occur.

Sure, but I will always wonder why it is that only liberals are held to some sort of insult standard and conservatives aren't. Conservatives are all over the place insulting liberals every day. Some have made entire lucrative media careers out of it.

I also wonder how adults can justify casting a vote based on nothing more than "neener, neener, libtard!" But, oh well.

I will always wonder why it is that only liberals are held to some sort of insult standard and conservatives aren't. Conservatives are all over the place insulting liberals every day. Some have made entire lucrative media careers out of it.

Cool huh? Advertisers pay Big Bucks to get their commercials on the airwaves while liberals are being attacked. CNN tries the same thing and calls it News and no one will watch!

[Edited on 12/4/2017 by KCJimmy]

I will always wonder why it is that only liberals are held to some sort of insult standard and conservatives aren't. Conservatives are all over the place insulting liberals every day. Some have made entire lucrative media careers out of it.

Cool huh? Advertisers pay Big Bucks to get their commercials on the airwaves while liberals are being attacked. CNN tries the same thing and calls it News and no one will watch!

Whatever that's supposed to mean.

It means that advertisers are willing to pay big bucks to advertise on radio & TV shows where conservatives bash liberals. CNN (Liberals) bashes conservatives all day long and nobody listens (or watches). It seems in the entertainment world there is value in the bashing liberals but not so much the other way around.

It means that advertisers are willing to pay big bucks to advertise on radio & TV shows where conservatives bash liberals. CNN (Liberals) bashes conservatives all day long and nobody listens (or watches). It seems in the entertainment world there is value in the bashing liberals but not so much the other way around.

As long as you're good with it, that's all that matters.

You made the point. I just expanded it. You're Welcome! 😉

You made the point. I just expanded it. You're Welcome! 😉

It wasn't my point at all, but you knew that.

You made the point. I just expanded it. You're Welcome! 😉

It wasn't my point at all, but you knew that.

You are persistent, but you knew that.

Short answer, he won more delegates than did the others running in the GOP primaries.

Make it interesting...gimme the long answer. The other 17 wasted their time. None stood a chance. What was worth having low rent behavior that is beneath the office? Some here stated that they voted in the low rent behavior on purpose, out of spite for bad liberal behavior. Is that your position as well?

How about part of a long answer?

Remember the reports that some Dems were switching registration to GOP?

Pennsylvania reported that 50,179 voters switched party affiliation from Democrat to Republican in 2016.
During the period of 2008 to 2015 192,521 switched from D to R, while 124,526 switched from R to D.

CBS news reported that over 20,000 switched from D to R in Massachusetts in 2016.

There are still some sites and forums up that urge Dems to change to GOP so they can vote FOR Trump getting the nomination.

Read some comments on Quora.com, type in "Why don't democrats register as republicans and vote for
Trump in the primary so Clinton can win in the general election." Or, just type it into Google search.

If they followed that proposal, then that explains his leads over other candidates. If that is what happened, then the Dems voted Trump into the nomination thinking he couldn't possibly win. Well, he won, and now the Dems claim he's not their president, even though they are responsible for his election if they did as the proposals asked.

Short answer, he won more delegates than did the others running in the GOP primaries.

Make it interesting...gimme the long answer. The other 17 wasted their time. None stood a chance. What was worth having low rent behavior that is beneath the office? Some here stated that they voted in the low rent behavior on purpose, out of spite for bad liberal behavior. Is that your position as well?

How about part of a long answer?

Remember the reports that some Dems were switching registration to GOP?

Pennsylvania reported that 50,179 voters switched party affiliation from Democrat to Republican in 2016.
During the period of 2008 to 2015 192,521 switched from D to R, while 124,526 switched from R to D.

CBS news reported that over 20,000 switched from D to R in Massachusetts in 2016.

There are still some sites and forums up that urge Dems to change to GOP so they can vote FOR Trump getting the nomination.

Read some comments on Quora.com, type in "Why don't democrats register as republicans and vote for
Trump in the primary so Clinton can win in the general election." Or, just type it into Google search.

If they followed that proposal, then that explains his leads over other candidates. If that is what happened, then the Dems voted Trump into the nomination thinking he couldn't possibly win. Well, he won, and now the Dems claim he's not their president, even though they are responsible for his election if they did as the proposals asked.

What? No response to that fact that Democrats put Trump in the White House?

Short answer, he won more delegates than did the others running in the GOP primaries.

Make it interesting...gimme the long answer. The other 17 wasted their time. None stood a chance. What was worth having low rent behavior that is beneath the office? Some here stated that they voted in the low rent behavior on purpose, out of spite for bad liberal behavior. Is that your position as well?

How about part of a long answer?

Remember the reports that some Dems were switching registration to GOP?

Pennsylvania reported that 50,179 voters switched party affiliation from Democrat to Republican in 2016.
During the period of 2008 to 2015 192,521 switched from D to R, while 124,526 switched from R to D.

CBS news reported that over 20,000 switched from D to R in Massachusetts in 2016.

There are still some sites and forums up that urge Dems to change to GOP so they can vote FOR Trump getting the nomination.

Read some comments on Quora.com, type in "Why don't democrats register as republicans and vote for
Trump in the primary so Clinton can win in the general election." Or, just type it into Google search.

If they followed that proposal, then that explains his leads over other candidates. If that is what happened, then the Dems voted Trump into the nomination thinking he couldn't possibly win. Well, he won, and now the Dems claim he's not their president, even though they are responsible for his election if they did as the proposals asked.

What? No response to that fact that Democrats put Trump in the White House?

In some respects they did. Had a few Bernie or bust voters in a few key states not stayed home, Trump would not be ruining the country right now.