Four links on a post that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. That's impressive.
I thought you of all people would be giddy over the amount of "free PR" Hillary's problems have garnished.
Nobody complaining, though......
Bhawk is right, you are making no sense whatsoever.
And some people will complain about anything and everything, but no one HERE is complaining. In fact I think you may be the only person complaining about negative press for either candidate. Good job.
Four links on a post that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. That's impressive.
I thought you of all people would be giddy over the amount of "free PR" Hillary's problems have garnished.
Nobody complaining, though......
Bhawk is right, you are making no sense whatsoever.
And some people will complain about anything and everything, but no one HERE is complaining. In fact I think you may be the only person complaining about negative press for either candidate. Good job.
Goob has complained that the media is biased and won't do any pro-Trump stories.
The media is not happy with anything Trump has to say, there is not much people can do about a terror attack, except if you see someone leaves a bag someplace, well that's a sign, because in NY if someone leaves a bag someplace, someone else would steal it so you wouldn't just see it sitting there.
You realize that Donald loves to hate on the media yet use them for as much free PR as he can get.
If you say so.....but why do Liberals complain about the volume of coverage devoted to Hillary's email exploits, Benghazi, ect. After all, it's just "free PR," right?
Funny how that works.
Who's complaining?
Nobody.
http://money.cnn.com/2016/09/12/media/hillary-clinton-pneumonia/
Millions in "free PR." She didn't have to pay a dime for it!
Nobody at all...
http://fortune.com/2016/09/08/matt-lauer-hillary-clinton-donald-trump/
Nah, not much complaining....
http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2016-09-06/medias-sexist-coverage-of-hillary-clinton
"Free PR" that didn't she didn't have to pay for!
And if that's not enough even Hillary herself is in on it. Nobody complaining, though....
Doesn't she realize all the value that this "free PR" represents?
And why are so many leftists outraged over the Matt Lauer interview? All he did is ask her an email question or two. Just more "free PR" for HRC but they got mad at poor Matt anyway.....Strange.
You are taking a concept that worked advantageously for Trump in the primary and using it inappropriately in a context where negative news is in effect negative news.
Hang on. I once made the same argument, but I've been told here numerous times that negative coverage was just "free PR" and was actually beneficial to a candidate (Donald Trump.) That's why it's puzzling that many leftist are angry about all the "free PR" that Hillary has gotten. Very weird.
No, you've been told that Trump thinks all publicity is good publicity. He has said so. Hillary has never said it, so I don't know if she believes it or not. I've seen Trump purposely say outrageous things that he knows will get a lot of press. It's his strategy. I've seen Hillary say outrageous things too, but I don't think it's been intentional or part of a strategy.
The media is not happy with anything Trump has to say, there is not much people can do about a terror attack, except if you see someone leaves a bag someplace, well that's a sign, because in NY if someone leaves a bag someplace, someone else would steal it so you wouldn't just see it sitting there.
You realize that Donald loves to hate on the media yet use them for as much free PR as he can get.
If you say so.....but why do Liberals complain about the volume of coverage devoted to Hillary's email exploits, Benghazi, ect. After all, it's just "free PR," right?
Funny how that works.
Who's complaining?
Nobody.
http://money.cnn.com/2016/09/12/media/hillary-clinton-pneumonia/
Millions in "free PR." She didn't have to pay a dime for it!
Nobody at all...
http://fortune.com/2016/09/08/matt-lauer-hillary-clinton-donald-trump/
Nah, not much complaining....
http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2016-09-06/medias-sexist-coverage-of-hillary-clinton
"Free PR" that didn't she didn't have to pay for!
And if that's not enough even Hillary herself is in on it. Nobody complaining, though....
Doesn't she realize all the value that this "free PR" represents?
And why are so many leftists outraged over the Matt Lauer interview? All he did is ask her an email question or two. Just more "free PR" for HRC but they got mad at poor Matt anyway.....Strange.
You are taking a concept that worked advantageously for Trump in the primary and using it inappropriately in a context where negative news is in effect negative news.
Hang on. I once made the same argument, but I've been told here numerous times that negative coverage was just "free PR" and was actually beneficial to a candidate (Donald Trump.) That's why it's puzzling that many leftist are angry about all the "free PR" that Hillary has gotten. Very weird.
No, you've been told that Trump thinks all publicity is good publicity. He has said so. Hillary has never said it, so I don't know if she believes it or not. I've seen Trump purposely say outrageous things that he knows will get a lot of press. It's his strategy. I've seen Hillary say outrageous things too, but I don't think it's been intentional or part of a strategy.
Trump is well aware that his negative run in August caused a drop in the polls. He would also have to realize his recent good behavior helped him move up. My guess--and it is just a guess--is that Trump wants to get close to winning but not win and then he will say the election was rigged. Trump--I read some where--wants to start a media empire and this would give him an enraged audience and an excellent perch to attack the political system.
Four links on a post that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. That's impressive.
I thought you of all people would be giddy over the amount of "free PR" Hillary's problems have garnished.
Nobody complaining, though......
Bhawk is right, you are making no sense whatsoever.
And some people will complain about anything and everything, but no one HERE is complaining. In fact I think you may be the only person complaining about negative press for either candidate. Good job.
Who's complaining?
