The Allman Brothers Band
Large group of arme...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Large group of armed anti-government protesters take over federal building in Oregon

141 Posts
20 Users
0 Reactions
11.1 K Views
BillyBlastoff
(@billyblastoff)
Posts: 2450
Famed Member
 

These Hillbilly clowns will at least get plenty of snacks in prison.


 
Posted : January 27, 2016 2:33 pm
jkeller
(@jkeller)
Posts: 2961
Famed Member
 

These Hillbilly clowns will at least get plenty of snacks in prison.

And they will get to live in a government owned building. For many years. They won!!!!


 
Posted : January 27, 2016 2:38 pm
gondicar
(@gondicar)
Posts: 2666
Famed Member
Topic starter
 

Video of Finicum shooting has been released, and it clearly shows him trying to run a roadblock almost hitting a law enforcement officer in the process, then reaching not just once but twice for the gun he had on his waist...

http://www.pressherald.com/2016/01/29/fbi-shows-video-of-shooting-of-oregon-occupier-lavoy-finicum/


 
Posted : January 29, 2016 4:06 am
Muleman1994
(@muleman1994)
Posts: 4923
Member
 

And the Russian Uranium trafficking can continue.

The land belongs to the American People, not the federal government.


 
Posted : January 29, 2016 7:03 am
Swifty
(@swifty)
Posts: 401
Reputable Member
 

And the Russian Uranium trafficking can continue.

The land belongs to the American People, not the federal government.

Donald Trump the new leader of all things Republican does not agree with this. You need to keep up with the shifting policies of your side.

As Ilya Somin put it, “Trump did not merely claim that the Kelo v. New London decision was legally correct; he argued that it was ‘good’ to give government the power to forcibly displace homeowners and small businesses and transfer their property to influential developers on the theory that doing so might promote ‘economic development.’”?

Trump didn’t back down one inch; he insisted that the compensated, involuntary transfer of private property by the government was in the public’s best interests. He first used the example of a government seizing land for a road or highway — generally the least controversial and most broadly supported use of eminent domain. But he quickly broadened his argument, insisting that government should always be allowed to take private land for development projects if the promised public benefits are big enough.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/425212/donald-trump-eminent-domain-wonderful


 
Posted : January 29, 2016 7:43 am
Bhawk
(@bhawk)
Posts: 3333
Famed Member
 

The land belongs to the American People, not the federal government.

I'm an American. It's my land? Cool. Those folks need to get off my property.


 
Posted : January 29, 2016 7:45 am
PhotoRon286
(@photoron286)
Posts: 1930
Noble Member
 

And the Russian Uranium trafficking can continue.

The land belongs to the American People, not the federal government.

Deflect, deny, change the subject.

Classic low info trollboy.


 
Posted : January 29, 2016 8:33 am
2112
 2112
(@2112)
Posts: 2464
Famed Member
 

Yes, land owned by the federal government belongs to ALL American people, as administered by the government. People can't do anything they want on federal land. If it wasn't that way I think I'll build a house with a primo view of Half Dome and Yosemite Falls in Yosemite Valley. Maybe I'll barrow a F-18 for a weekend trip to Miami.


 
Posted : January 29, 2016 8:56 am
Muleman1994
(@muleman1994)
Posts: 4923
Member
 

Yes, land owned by the federal government belongs to ALL American people, as administered by the government. People can't do anything they want on federal land. If it wasn't that way I think I'll build a house with a primo view of Half Dome and Yosemite Falls in Yosemite Valley. Maybe I'll barrow a F-18 for a weekend trip to Miami.

_________________________________________________________________________

"as administered by the government"

Please post that law.
Don't look too hard, it doesn't exist except of course in the mind of the left-wing socialist wannabe.


 
Posted : January 29, 2016 9:57 am
Bhawk
(@bhawk)
Posts: 3333
Famed Member
 


 
Posted : January 29, 2016 10:58 am
Muleman1994
(@muleman1994)
Posts: 4923
Member
 

___________________________________________________________________________

Exactly right, "Our Land".
Not the governments to control, require the people to pay a fee to use and restrict what they please.


 
Posted : January 29, 2016 11:12 am
Bhawk
(@bhawk)
Posts: 3333
Famed Member
 

So what do you propose, anarchy?

Do you own a house? Any property? That's your property because a tax bill issued by a government agency says so.

Can anyone come squat in your back yard any time they please? After all, it's everyone's land.


 
Posted : January 29, 2016 11:36 am
BrerRabbit
(@brerrabbit)
Posts: 5580
Illustrious Member
 

Yes they can, but they have to bring their own snacks.


 
Posted : January 29, 2016 11:38 am
Muleman1994
(@muleman1994)
Posts: 4923
Member
 

Yes they can, but they have to bring their own snacks.

__________________________________________________________________________

They can get health insurance in Oregon... oh wait, the Oregon health exchange failed and dumped everyone into the federal system of poor, high premiums and deductibles insurance.
Yea, they got health insurance but can't afford to use it.


 
Posted : January 29, 2016 12:46 pm
2112
 2112
(@2112)
Posts: 2464
Famed Member
 

Yes, land owned by the federal government belongs to ALL American people, as administered by the government. People can't do anything they want on federal land. If it wasn't that way I think I'll build a house with a primo view of Half Dome and Yosemite Falls in Yosemite Valley. Maybe I'll barrow a F-18 for a weekend trip to Miami.

_________________________________________________________________________

"as administered by the government"

Please post that law.
Don't look too hard, it doesn't exist except of course in the mind of the left-wing socialist wannabe.

The 5th Amendment of the Constitution allows the government to buy land. Do you think they aren't allowed to administer it the way they want? Go try to do what you want on public land without going through the processes in place in the law and see how it works out for you.


 
Posted : January 29, 2016 12:47 pm
Muleman1994
(@muleman1994)
Posts: 4923
Member
 

Yes, land owned by the federal government belongs to ALL American people, as administered by the government. People can't do anything they want on federal land. If it wasn't that way I think I'll build a house with a primo view of Half Dome and Yosemite Falls in Yosemite Valley. Maybe I'll barrow a F-18 for a weekend trip to Miami.

_________________________________________________________________________

"as administered by the government"

Please post that law.
Don't look too hard, it doesn't exist except of course in the mind of the left-wing socialist wannabe.

The 5th Amendment of the Constitution allows the government to buy land. Do you think they aren't allowed to administer it the way they want? Go try to do what you want on public land without going through the processes in place in the law and see how it works out for you.

________________________________________________________________________

The optimum word being "buy" the land.
The federal government appropriating (seizing) the land.

Do you understand the difference?


 
Posted : January 29, 2016 12:53 pm
jkeller
(@jkeller)
Posts: 2961
Famed Member
 

Yes, land owned by the federal government belongs to ALL American people, as administered by the government. People can't do anything they want on federal land. If it wasn't that way I think I'll build a house with a primo view of Half Dome and Yosemite Falls in Yosemite Valley. Maybe I'll barrow a F-18 for a weekend trip to Miami.

_________________________________________________________________________

"as administered by the government"

Please post that law.
Don't look too hard, it doesn't exist except of course in the mind of the left-wing socialist wannabe.

Actually it does exist and was passed in1976. I know you won't read this, you will just attack the source.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/43/1701


 
Posted : January 29, 2016 12:53 pm
Muleman1994
(@muleman1994)
Posts: 4923
Member
 

Yes, land owned by the federal government belongs to ALL American people, as administered by the government. People can't do anything they want on federal land. If it wasn't that way I think I'll build a house with a primo view of Half Dome and Yosemite Falls in Yosemite Valley. Maybe I'll barrow a F-18 for a weekend trip to Miami.

_________________________________________________________________________

"as administered by the government"

Please post that law.
Don't look too hard, it doesn't exist except of course in the mind of the left-wing socialist wannabe.

Actually it does exist and was passed in1976. I know you won't read this, you will just attack the source.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/43/1701

_________________________________________________________________________

And here we have keller trying to interpret the law.
This is the same idiot who cannot tell the difference between a framework agreement and a treaty.


 
Posted : January 29, 2016 12:58 pm
Bhawk
(@bhawk)
Posts: 3333
Famed Member
 

Hey now, you didn't know the difference between Kansas and Missouri. Shouldn't throw stones.


 
Posted : January 29, 2016 1:03 pm
jkeller
(@jkeller)
Posts: 2961
Famed Member
 

Yes, land owned by the federal government belongs to ALL American people, as administered by the government. People can't do anything they want on federal land. If it wasn't that way I think I'll build a house with a primo view of Half Dome and Yosemite Falls in Yosemite Valley. Maybe I'll barrow a F-18 for a weekend trip to Miami.

_________________________________________________________________________

"as administered by the government"

Please post that law.
Don't look too hard, it doesn't exist except of course in the mind of the left-wing socialist wannabe.

Actually it does exist and was passed in1976. I know you won't read this, you will just attack the source.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/43/1701

_________________________________________________________________________

And here we have keller trying to interpret the law.
This is the same idiot who cannot tell the difference between a framework agreement and a treaty.

I didn't interpret anything. You asked for the law, you got the law. You are wrong once again. Deal with it, misanthrope.

And please remember that you were the guy who didn't know the difference between land ice and ocean ice in the Southern Hemisphere.

You are also the guy who claims to have an executive job but spends the entire day on this site, only to disappear in the evening when your shift at Burger King starts.

[Edited on 1/29/2016 by jkeller]


 
Posted : January 29, 2016 1:04 pm
BillyBlastoff
(@billyblastoff)
Posts: 2450
Famed Member
 

Hey now, you didn't know the difference between Kansas and Missouri. Shouldn't throw stones.

I had forgotten! That was so funny. Muleman is just flat out cute!


 
Posted : January 29, 2016 3:09 pm
Muleman1994
(@muleman1994)
Posts: 4923
Member
 

The little liberal kids, unable to discuss the thread intelligently lie yet again and head right to the toilet.


 
Posted : January 29, 2016 3:18 pm
jkeller
(@jkeller)
Posts: 2961
Famed Member
 

The little liberal kids, unable to discuss the thread intelligently lie yet again and head right to the toilet.

Really? You keep making a big thing out of a word I misused then say when it is turned around that we are heading right to the toilet. Apparently, that is where you live.

Now, getting back on topic, you asked for the law and I gave you the law. Care to admit you are wrong? Again?


 
Posted : January 29, 2016 3:25 pm
2112
 2112
(@2112)
Posts: 2464
Famed Member
 

Yes, land owned by the federal government belongs to ALL American people, as administered by the government. People can't do anything they want on federal land. If it wasn't that way I think I'll build a house with a primo view of Half Dome and Yosemite Falls in Yosemite Valley. Maybe I'll barrow a F-18 for a weekend trip to Miami.

_________________________________________________________________________

"as administered by the government"

Please post that law.
Don't look too hard, it doesn't exist except of course in the mind of the left-wing socialist wannabe.

Actually it does exist and was passed in1976. I know you won't read this, you will just attack the source.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/43/1701

_________________________________________________________________________

And here we have keller trying to interpret the law.
This is the same idiot who cannot tell the difference between a framework agreement and a treaty.

Did you read the link? You said it didn't exist, and here it is. This is exactly what you asked for, and it is pretty crystal clear!


 
Posted : January 29, 2016 3:50 pm
BoytonBrother
(@boytonbrother)
Posts: 2859
Member
 

And the Russian Uranium trafficking can continue.

The little liberal kids, unable to discuss the thread intelligently lie yet again and head right to the toilet.

This is the same idiot who cannot tell the difference between a framework agreement and a treaty.

Ho Hum. Yet another dark, gloomy, sad, dismal outlook from Muleman. It sounds painful to be you. I've been reading your posts for a long long time, and not once have any of us seen you post anything happy or positive. What does that mean to you?

[Edited on 1/30/2016 by BoytonBrother]


 
Posted : January 30, 2016 4:14 am
DougMacKenzie
(@dougmackenzie)
Posts: 582
Honorable Member
 

I've been reading your posts for a long long time,

Mistake number 1...... Grin


 
Posted : January 30, 2016 4:43 am
Muleman1994
(@muleman1994)
Posts: 4923
Member
 

Yes, land owned by the federal government belongs to ALL American people, as administered by the government. People can't do anything they want on federal land. If it wasn't that way I think I'll build a house with a primo view of Half Dome and Yosemite Falls in Yosemite Valley. Maybe I'll barrow a F-18 for a weekend trip to Miami.

_________________________________________________________________________

"as administered by the government"

Please post that law.
Don't look too hard, it doesn't exist except of course in the mind of the left-wing socialist wannabe.

Actually it does exist and was passed in1976. I know you won't read this, you will just attack the source.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/43/1701

_________________________________________________________________________

And here we have keller trying to interpret the law.
This is the same idiot who cannot tell the difference between a framework agreement and a treaty.

Did you read the link? You said it didn't exist, and here it is. This is exactly what you asked for, and it is pretty crystal clear!

_______________________________________________________________________

I did read the link and that particular law clearly states that the authority to seize the land by the federal government lies in the The Congress, not the President.

Of course you would know this if you had read the link.


 
Posted : January 30, 2016 7:25 am
Sang
 Sang
(@sang)
Posts: 5848
Illustrious Member
 

Nobody said it was the President.................. deny, deflect..... 😛


 
Posted : January 30, 2016 8:19 am
jkeller
(@jkeller)
Posts: 2961
Famed Member
 

Yes, land owned by the federal government belongs to ALL American people, as administered by the government. People can't do anything they want on federal land. If it wasn't that way I think I'll build a house with a primo view of Half Dome and Yosemite Falls in Yosemite Valley. Maybe I'll barrow a F-18 for a weekend trip to Miami.

_________________________________________________________________________

"as administered by the government"

Please post that law.
Don't look too hard, it doesn't exist except of course in the mind of the left-wing socialist wannabe.

Actually it does exist and was passed in1976. I know you won't read this, you will just attack the source.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/43/1701

_________________________________________________________________________

And here we have keller trying to interpret the law.
This is the same idiot who cannot tell the difference between a framework agreement and a treaty.

Did you read the link? You said it didn't exist, and here it is. This is exactly what you asked for, and it is pretty crystal clear!

_______________________________________________________________________

I did read the link and that particular law clearly states that the authority to seize the land by the federal government lies in the The Congress, not the President.

Of course you would know this if you had read the link.

I did know this and it has nothing to do with this situation. The land in question in Oregon (and Nevada in last years confrontation) became government land when this law was passed. This law effectively ended the Homestead Act. If you had read the link you would know that.


 
Posted : January 30, 2016 9:09 am
Muleman1994
(@muleman1994)
Posts: 4923
Member
 

Yes, land owned by the federal government belongs to ALL American people, as administered by the government. People can't do anything they want on federal land. If it wasn't that way I think I'll build a house with a primo view of Half Dome and Yosemite Falls in Yosemite Valley. Maybe I'll barrow a F-18 for a weekend trip to Miami.

_________________________________________________________________________

"as administered by the government"

Please post that law.
Don't look too hard, it doesn't exist except of course in the mind of the left-wing socialist wannabe.

Actually it does exist and was passed in1976. I know you won't read this, you will just attack the source.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/43/1701

_________________________________________________________________________

And here we have keller trying to interpret the law.
This is the same idiot who cannot tell the difference between a framework agreement and a treaty.

Did you read the link? You said it didn't exist, and here it is. This is exactly what you asked for, and it is pretty crystal clear!

_______________________________________________________________________

I did read the link and that particular law clearly states that the authority to seize the land by the federal government lies in the The Congress, not the President.

Of course you would know this if you had read the link.

I did know this and it has nothing to do with this situation. The land in question in Oregon (and Nevada in last years confrontation) became government land when this law was passed. This law effectively ended the Homestead Act. If you had read the link you would know that.

_________________________________________________________________________

The particular parcel of land in question was seized by the Obama regime dumba$$.


 
Posted : January 30, 2016 10:31 am
Page 4 / 5
Share: