So that others don’t behave the way Bill did. You’ve been crying about Bill on here for how awful he was.

Why should Roy Moore, Donald Trump or Al Franken step down in the face of accusations when Bill Clinton wouldn't?

Well, Al Franken is stepping down, so...because Bill Clinton, Republican elected officials can do whatever they want when it comes to this kind of thing until the end of time?

Why is your condemnation/allowance/tolerance of sexual misconduct only run through a political filter?

It's not. If I had sex with an intern 27 years younger than me in my office I would be fired. Wouldn't have to step down. However I would like to think that if I was accused of something I didn't do that I would have the opportunity to face my accuser, perhaps tell my side of the story. That doesn't seem unreasonable to me.

wee wee

Why should Roy Moore, Donald Trump or Al Franken step down in the face of accusations when Bill Clinton wouldn't?

Well, Al Franken is stepping down, so...because Bill Clinton, Republican elected officials can do whatever they want when it comes to this kind of thing until the end of time?

Why is your condemnation/allowance/tolerance of sexual misconduct only run through a political filter?

It's not. If I had sex with an intern 27 years younger than me in my office I would be fired. Wouldn't have to step down. However I would like to think that if I was accused of something I didn't do that I would have the opportunity to face my accuser, perhaps tell my side of the story. That doesn't seem unreasonable to me.

In the private sector you would have recourse and your accuser would have the burden of proof.
No so much in politics.

In the private sector you also would not have a tax-payer funded slush fund to pay the accuser off.
It would seem that now in politics just an accusation has become the norm.

Why should Roy Moore, Donald Trump or Al Franken step down in the face of accusations when Bill Clinton wouldn't?

Well, Al Franken is stepping down, so...because Bill Clinton, Republican elected officials can do whatever they want when it comes to this kind of thing until the end of time?

Why is your condemnation/allowance/tolerance of sexual misconduct only run through a political filter?

It's not. If I had sex with an intern 27 years younger than me in my office I would be fired. Wouldn't have to step down. However I would like to think that if I was accused of something I didn't do that I would have the opportunity to face my accuser, perhaps tell my side of the story. That doesn't seem unreasonable to me.

If you are referring to Roy Moore, what you are essentially saying is that you believe these women that you listed:

Juanita Broaddrick
Kathleen Willey
Paula Jones

But you don't believe Moore's accusers. Correct?

And, because Bill Clinton, Republican elected officials can do whatever they want when it comes to this kind of thing until the end of time?

Why should Roy Moore, Donald Trump or Al Franken step down in the face of accusations when Bill Clinton wouldn't?

Well, Al Franken is stepping down, so...because Bill Clinton, Republican elected officials can do whatever they want when it comes to this kind of thing until the end of time?

Why is your condemnation/allowance/tolerance of sexual misconduct only run through a political filter?

It's not. If I had sex with an intern 27 years younger than me in my office I would be fired. Wouldn't have to step down. However I would like to think that if I was accused of something I didn't do that I would have the opportunity to face my accuser, perhaps tell my side of the story. That doesn't seem unreasonable to me.

If you are referring to Roy Moore, what you are essentially saying is that you believe these women that you listed:

Juanita Broaddrick
Kathleen Willey
Paula Jones

But you don't believe Moore's accusers. Correct?

And, because Bill Clinton, Republican elected officials can do whatever they want when it comes to this kind of thing until the end of time?

Of course because- Bush Reagan good. Clinton Gore bad 😮

In the private sector you would have recourse and your accuser would have the burden of proof.
No so much in politics.

In the private sector you also would not have a tax-payer funded slush fund to pay the accuser off.
It would seem that now in politics just an accusation has become the norm.

That's not true at all. HR departments can fire people without a burden of proof, and people who are fired are welcome to sue and receive a settlement (of private company funds). Example: FOX News paid off Bill O'Reilly's accusers, and later fired him.