
And the liberals continue with no answer as to why they got whipped at every level of government.
A few irrelevant comments and petty insults.
Sad but typical. When y'all have something to contribute,let us know.
That's funny, Porky.
_________________________
Glad you are amused.
The rest of us are still laughing over the liberals crying over the complete rejection of obama and the democrats.Ever consider contributing to the discussion?
What have you contributed, Porky?

You are not a smart as you think you are.
The only bs is your weak analysis that has no basis in reality.
And yet between the two of you, not a single rational thought to disprove anything I said.

You are not a smart as you think you are.
The only bs is your weak analysis that has no basis in reality.
And yet between the two of you, not a single rational thought to disprove anything I said.
You offer your opinions with just enough condescension to make yourself seem superior and above the fray, without trying to prove any of it, and then tell others to prove you are wrong. You and muleman have a lot in common in that regard.

You are not a smart as you think you are.
The only bs is your weak analysis that has no basis in reality.
And yet between the two of you, not a single rational thought to disprove anything I said.
You stated an opinion with nothing to back it up. To use a line you used, I am not going to do your research for you.

You offer your opinions with just enough condescension to make yourself seem superior and above the fray, without trying to prove any of it, and then tell others to prove you are wrong. You and muleman have a lot in common in that regard.
Condescension towards or anyone in this thread? Like your direct accusation? Pot, meet kettle.
You stated an opinion with nothing to back it up. To use a line you used, I am not going to do your research for you.
Well, I assumed some would have the memory to easily link the events to the comments, but for those needing a bit more....
The elimination of Glass-Steagall during the Clinton administration was a key factor permitting banks and investment houses to merge - something previously against the law. The removal of this firewall was a key factor in allowing the casino atmosphere among the big banks to flourish, and why TARP was eventually necessary to bail them out. more...
The Bush administration went to Congress numerous times trying to bring attention to problems brewing at Fannie and Freddie regarding sub-prime loans. They were ignored. While Fannie and Freddie's misdeeds were not the only factor of the crisis, they were a major part of it.
While it is true that TARP funds were re-paid quickly and with interest, the banks and markets found another path to get their losses back (and then some). Since the largest banking institutions run the Federal Reserve, their policy of money printing (quantitative easing) has shoveled untold wealth to the largest investors without them lifting a finger. The rise of the stock market under Obama is an artificial creation. This reality is no harder to check than to notice the numerous times markets were reported as "nervous" over recent years whenever the Fed met and there was a rumor that lowering QE was on the agenda. Markets aren't at highs because of expanded sales and company growth, it's all due to trillions in extra cash that been created out of nothing and needs to find a home. This will eventually crash, as it has every time it's been tried throughout history.
No President of recent memory has taken on the Fed or the bankers, even though surely they know the consequences of this path. Trading temporary comfort for longer-term security doesn't seem like very strong policy.
The saddest part of that article was the premise that just because some rich guy is well off, he has no basis to complain about Obama. As if economic well-being is the only measure. Talk about short-sighted.

You are not a smart as you think you are.
The only bs is your weak analysis that has no basis in reality.
And yet between the two of you, not a single rational thought to disprove anything I said.
You stated an opinion with nothing to back it up. To use a line you used, I am not going to do your research for you.
__________________________________________________
The People know exactly why obama and reid and the democrats were rejected.
Not one liberal here has yet to state why.
That in and of itself is yet another reason the liberals lost the election at every level of government.
Tough to look failure in the face ain't it?

More good news for the GOP...
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/223406-after-rout-dems-plan-few-changes

You are not a smart as you think you are.
The only bs is your weak analysis that has no basis in reality.
And yet between the two of you, not a single rational thought to disprove anything I said.
You stated an opinion with nothing to back it up. To use a line you used, I am not going to do your research for you.
__________________________________________________
The People know exactly why obama and reid and the democrats were rejected.
Not one liberal here has yet to state why.
That in and of itself is yet another reason the liberals lost the election at every level of government.Tough to look failure in the face ain't it?
This discussion had absolutely nothing to do with the election. However, your inability to know what words should be capitalized and which shouldn't is just another glimpse into your lack of grasp of language and grammar. It is ironic when you ridicule others intelligence. 😛

More good news for the GOP...
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/223406-after-rout-dems-plan-few-changes
Not really. Parties don't generally change leadership after a midterm except for leaders who do not get reelected.

More good news for the GOP...
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/223406-after-rout-dems-plan-few-changes
Not really. Parties don't generally change leadership after a midterm except for leaders who do not get reelected.
Once again, you make a statement with nothing to back it up.

More good news for the GOP...
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/223406-after-rout-dems-plan-few-changes
Not really. Parties don't generally change leadership after a midterm except for leaders who do not get reelected.
Once again, you make a statement with nothing to back it up.
Once again? Really? I thought you knew everything.

You are not a smart as you think you are.
The only bs is your weak analysis that has no basis in reality.
And yet between the two of you, not a single rational thought to disprove anything I said.
You stated an opinion with nothing to back it up. To use a line you used, I am not going to do your research for you.
__________________________________________________
The People know exactly why obama and reid and the democrats were rejected.
Not one liberal here has yet to state why.
That in and of itself is yet another reason the liberals lost the election at every level of government.Tough to look failure in the face ain't it?
This discussion had absolutely nothing to do with the election. However, your inability to know what words should be capitalized and which shouldn't is just another glimpse into your lack of grasp of language and grammar. It is ironic when you ridicule others intelligence. 😛
_________________________________________
I capitalize or not that which I choose and for a specific reason and the reason should be obvious to even you with your public school education.
Speaking of a specific reason, you still have not stated your reason for obama, reid and the democrats complete humiliation on election day.
Are you simply incapable of independent thought?

You are not a smart as you think you are.
The only bs is your weak analysis that has no basis in reality.
And yet between the two of you, not a single rational thought to disprove anything I said.
You stated an opinion with nothing to back it up. To use a line you used, I am not going to do your research for you.
__________________________________________________
The People know exactly why obama and reid and the democrats were rejected.
Not one liberal here has yet to state why.
That in and of itself is yet another reason the liberals lost the election at every level of government.Tough to look failure in the face ain't it?
This discussion had absolutely nothing to do with the election. However, your inability to know what words should be capitalized and which shouldn't is just another glimpse into your lack of grasp of language and grammar. It is ironic when you ridicule others intelligence. 😛
_________________________________________
I capitalize or not that which I choose and for a specific reason and the reason should be obvious to even you with your public school education.
Speaking of a specific reason, you still have not stated your reason for obama, reid and the democrats complete humiliation on election day.
Are you simply incapable of independent thought?
I answered that as did a few others. What is with the shots at public education? I am sure there are more than a few on here who had a public school education, both liberal and conservative. If you are a product of private school education, you are a poster boy for money wasted on education. Ypour parents must be so proud and happy about the failed investment. 😛

You are not a smart as you think you are.
The only bs is your weak analysis that has no basis in reality.
And yet between the two of you, not a single rational thought to disprove anything I said.
You stated an opinion with nothing to back it up. To use a line you used, I am not going to do your research for you.
__________________________________________________
The People know exactly why obama and reid and the democrats were rejected.
Not one liberal here has yet to state why.
That in and of itself is yet another reason the liberals lost the election at every level of government.Tough to look failure in the face ain't it?
This discussion had absolutely nothing to do with the election. However, your inability to know what words should be capitalized and which shouldn't is just another glimpse into your lack of grasp of language and grammar. It is ironic when you ridicule others intelligence. 😛
_________________________________________
I capitalize or not that which I choose and for a specific reason and the reason should be obvious to even you with your public school education.
Speaking of a specific reason, you still have not stated your reason for obama, reid and the democrats complete humiliation on election day.
Are you simply incapable of independent thought?
I answered that as did a few others. What is with the shots at public education? I am sure there are more than a few on here who had a public school education, both liberal and conservative. If you are a product of private school education, you are a poster boy for money wasted on education. Ypour parents must be so proud and happy about the failed investment. 😛
_______________________________________
Your poor education is obvious.
Keep on losing son.
Still cant' articulate why you are all in for Hillary or why obama, reid and the democrats lost at every level of government?

You are not a smart as you think you are.
The only bs is your weak analysis that has no basis in reality.
And yet between the two of you, not a single rational thought to disprove anything I said.
You stated an opinion with nothing to back it up. To use a line you used, I am not going to do your research for you.
__________________________________________________
The People know exactly why obama and reid and the democrats were rejected.
Not one liberal here has yet to state why.
That in and of itself is yet another reason the liberals lost the election at every level of government.Tough to look failure in the face ain't it?
This discussion had absolutely nothing to do with the election. However, your inability to know what words should be capitalized and which shouldn't is just another glimpse into your lack of grasp of language and grammar. It is ironic when you ridicule others intelligence. 😛
_________________________________________
I capitalize or not that which I choose and for a specific reason and the reason should be obvious to even you with your public school education.
Speaking of a specific reason, you still have not stated your reason for obama, reid and the democrats complete humiliation on election day.
Are you simply incapable of independent thought?
I answered that as did a few others. What is with the shots at public education? I am sure there are more than a few on here who had a public school education, both liberal and conservative. If you are a product of private school education, you are a poster boy for money wasted on education. Ypour parents must be so proud and happy about the failed investment. 😛
_______________________________________
Your poor education is obvious.
Keep on losing son.Still cant' articulate why you are all in for Hillary or why obama, reid and the democrats lost at every level of government?
We are in for Hillary because she is a moderate and can and will win in 2016 because the GOP has nobody even remotely on the radar that can beat her. You and the other conservatives are unsure of yourselves you are afraid to even speculate who might run against her. Pretty much sums up your Presidential candidate pool.
And the Dems lost at all levels of Government? Really? Did I miss Obama being deposed as President of the United States?
Enjoy your hollow victory Mule as nothing will change for the next two years. you want to know why? I have one word for you VETO!

You are not a smart as you think you are.
The only bs is your weak analysis that has no basis in reality.
And yet between the two of you, not a single rational thought to disprove anything I said.
You stated an opinion with nothing to back it up. To use a line you used, I am not going to do your research for you.
__________________________________________________
The People know exactly why obama and reid and the democrats were rejected.
Not one liberal here has yet to state why.
That in and of itself is yet another reason the liberals lost the election at every level of government.Tough to look failure in the face ain't it?
This discussion had absolutely nothing to do with the election. However, your inability to know what words should be capitalized and which shouldn't is just another glimpse into your lack of grasp of language and grammar. It is ironic when you ridicule others intelligence. 😛
_________________________________________
I capitalize or not that which I choose and for a specific reason and the reason should be obvious to even you with your public school education.
Speaking of a specific reason, you still have not stated your reason for obama, reid and the democrats complete humiliation on election day.
Are you simply incapable of independent thought?
I answered that as did a few others. What is with the shots at public education? I am sure there are more than a few on here who had a public school education, both liberal and conservative. If you are a product of private school education, you are a poster boy for money wasted on education. Ypour parents must be so proud and happy about the failed investment. 😛
_______________________________________
Your poor education is obvious.
Keep on losing son.Still cant' articulate why you are all in for Hillary or why obama, reid and the democrats lost at every level of government?
We are in for Hillary because she is a moderate and can and will win in 2016 because the GOP has nobody even remotely on the radar that can beat her. You and the other conservatives are unsure of yourselves you are afraid to even speculate who might run against her. Pretty much sums up your Presidential candidate pool.
And the Dems lost at all levels of Government? Really? Did I miss Obama being deposed as President of the United States?
Enjoy your hollow victory Mule as nothing will change for the next two years. you want to know why? I have one word for you VETO!
______________________
Well, that is your opinion based on not facts at all.
Again I ask: why are all the liberals all in for no-resume Hillary?
Do you expect her to run unopposed?
She couldn't even get her parties nomination the last time she ran.

You are not a smart as you think you are.
The only bs is your weak analysis that has no basis in reality.
And yet between the two of you, not a single rational thought to disprove anything I said.
You stated an opinion with nothing to back it up. To use a line you used, I am not going to do your research for you.
__________________________________________________
The People know exactly why obama and reid and the democrats were rejected.
Not one liberal here has yet to state why.
That in and of itself is yet another reason the liberals lost the election at every level of government.Tough to look failure in the face ain't it?
This discussion had absolutely nothing to do with the election. However, your inability to know what words should be capitalized and which shouldn't is just another glimpse into your lack of grasp of language and grammar. It is ironic when you ridicule others intelligence. 😛
_________________________________________
I capitalize or not that which I choose and for a specific reason and the reason should be obvious to even you with your public school education.
Speaking of a specific reason, you still have not stated your reason for obama, reid and the democrats complete humiliation on election day.
Are you simply incapable of independent thought?
I answered that as did a few others. What is with the shots at public education? I am sure there are more than a few on here who had a public school education, both liberal and conservative. If you are a product of private school education, you are a poster boy for money wasted on education. Ypour parents must be so proud and happy about the failed investment. 😛
_______________________________________
Your poor education is obvious.
Keep on losing son.Still cant' articulate why you are all in for Hillary or why obama, reid and the democrats lost at every level of government?
We are in for Hillary because she is a moderate and can and will win in 2016 because the GOP has nobody even remotely on the radar that can beat her. You and the other conservatives are unsure of yourselves you are afraid to even speculate who might run against her. Pretty much sums up your Presidential candidate pool.
And the Dems lost at all levels of Government? Really? Did I miss Obama being deposed as President of the United States?
Enjoy your hollow victory Mule as nothing will change for the next two years. you want to know why? I have one word for you VETO!
______________________
Well, that is your opinion based on not facts at all.
Again I ask: why are all the liberals all in for no-resume Hillary?
Do you expect her to run unopposed?
She couldn't even get her parties nomination the last time she ran.
How many times did Romney run? Who is your GOP candidate?

You are not a smart as you think you are.
The only bs is your weak analysis that has no basis in reality.
And yet between the two of you, not a single rational thought to disprove anything I said.
You stated an opinion with nothing to back it up. To use a line you used, I am not going to do your research for you.
__________________________________________________
The People know exactly why obama and reid and the democrats were rejected.
Not one liberal here has yet to state why.
That in and of itself is yet another reason the liberals lost the election at every level of government.Tough to look failure in the face ain't it?
This discussion had absolutely nothing to do with the election. However, your inability to know what words should be capitalized and which shouldn't is just another glimpse into your lack of grasp of language and grammar. It is ironic when you ridicule others intelligence. 😛
_________________________________________
I capitalize or not that which I choose and for a specific reason and the reason should be obvious to even you with your public school education.
Speaking of a specific reason, you still have not stated your reason for obama, reid and the democrats complete humiliation on election day.
Are you simply incapable of independent thought?
I answered that as did a few others. What is with the shots at public education? I am sure there are more than a few on here who had a public school education, both liberal and conservative. If you are a product of private school education, you are a poster boy for money wasted on education. Ypour parents must be so proud and happy about the failed investment. 😛
_______________________________________
Your poor education is obvious.
Keep on losing son.Still cant' articulate why you are all in for Hillary or why obama, reid and the democrats lost at every level of government?
We are in for Hillary because she is a moderate and can and will win in 2016 because the GOP has nobody even remotely on the radar that can beat her. You and the other conservatives are unsure of yourselves you are afraid to even speculate who might run against her. Pretty much sums up your Presidential candidate pool.
And the Dems lost at all levels of Government? Really? Did I miss Obama being deposed as President of the United States?
Enjoy your hollow victory Mule as nothing will change for the next two years. you want to know why? I have one word for you VETO!
______________________
Well, that is your opinion based on not facts at all.
Again I ask: why are all the liberals all in for no-resume Hillary?
Do you expect her to run unopposed?
She couldn't even get her parties nomination the last time she ran.How many times did Romney run? Who is your GOP candidate?
________________________________
There are no candidates for the 2016 election.
You still have not answered the question of why should anyone want Hillary.

You are not a smart as you think you are.
The only bs is your weak analysis that has no basis in reality.
And yet between the two of you, not a single rational thought to disprove anything I said.
You stated an opinion with nothing to back it up. To use a line you used, I am not going to do your research for you.
__________________________________________________
The People know exactly why obama and reid and the democrats were rejected.
Not one liberal here has yet to state why.
That in and of itself is yet another reason the liberals lost the election at every level of government.Tough to look failure in the face ain't it?
This discussion had absolutely nothing to do with the election. However, your inability to know what words should be capitalized and which shouldn't is just another glimpse into your lack of grasp of language and grammar. It is ironic when you ridicule others intelligence. 😛
_________________________________________
I capitalize or not that which I choose and for a specific reason and the reason should be obvious to even you with your public school education.
Speaking of a specific reason, you still have not stated your reason for obama, reid and the democrats complete humiliation on election day.
Are you simply incapable of independent thought?
I answered that as did a few others. What is with the shots at public education? I am sure there are more than a few on here who had a public school education, both liberal and conservative. If you are a product of private school education, you are a poster boy for money wasted on education. Ypour parents must be so proud and happy about the failed investment. 😛
_______________________________________
Your poor education is obvious.
Keep on losing son.Still cant' articulate why you are all in for Hillary or why obama, reid and the democrats lost at every level of government?
We are in for Hillary because she is a moderate and can and will win in 2016 because the GOP has nobody even remotely on the radar that can beat her. You and the other conservatives are unsure of yourselves you are afraid to even speculate who might run against her. Pretty much sums up your Presidential candidate pool.
And the Dems lost at all levels of Government? Really? Did I miss Obama being deposed as President of the United States?
Enjoy your hollow victory Mule as nothing will change for the next two years. you want to know why? I have one word for you VETO!
______________________
Well, that is your opinion based on not facts at all.
Again I ask: why are all the liberals all in for no-resume Hillary?
Do you expect her to run unopposed?
She couldn't even get her parties nomination the last time she ran.How many times did Romney run? Who is your GOP candidate?
________________________________
There are no candidates for the 2016 election.
You still have not answered the question of why should anyone want Hillary.
Hillary hasn't declared. It is not my job to teach you about her.
BTW, Ben Carson has declared as a Republican candidate.

Sounds familiar - I recognize a couple of posters in here......
The 10 Step Republican Process for Creating the Perfect Mindless Conservative Zombie
I’ve hit a point in political discourse where much of the time I teeter on the edge of anger and laughter when dealing with conservatives. To me, many conservatives don’t behave like people who follow a political party, but rather like individuals who have joined a cult. And while many people often seem shocked at how so many Americans continue to vote against their own interests, it’s really not as complicated as it might seem.
You see, Republicans have developed a great scheme for creating the perfect brainless conservative zombie. Someone who just grunts out right-wing talking points, without a thought in the world as to whether or not there’s any reality to support them, who strolls through the political world aimlessly waiting for someone to tell them what to think or do. So I thought I’d explain how this process works.
1) Use fear: It’s human nature to fear the unknown or resist change (out of fear of it). And fear is a great emotion to exploit to make people act irrationally.
2) Attack education: Facts show the more educated someone is, the less likely they’re going to be conservative. A well-informed electorate is bad news for Republicans.
3) Use a lot of patriotic propaganda: Take it from someone who deals with conservatives constantly, they really do believe liberals hate America and that they’re the beacon of patriotism. Which is ironic considering the only time you really see anyone promote secession from the United States, they’re from the conservative political spectrum. They think flying an American flag at their home, shouting “God bless America” whenever they get the chance and loving guns makes them “patriotic.” But all they’ve done is wrapped a flag around their ignorance while calling it patriotism.
4) Find things to hate: Conservatives hate a lot. Be it immigrants, non-Christian religions, minorities or the poor – they have a seemingly endless list of people or groups they despise. Hate is a great tool that’s often used to unify and justify ignorance.
5) Make themselves into the victim: Whether it’s the media, Hollywood, science, environmentalists, teachers, unions – conservatives are always the ones who it seems the entire world is out to “get.” Well, at least according to them.
6) Promote guns: It never ceases to shock me how Americans are so obsessed with guns. All conservatives had to do was decide that no matter how many thousands of Americans were slaughtered every year by guns – they were going to endlessly promote guns. They’ve managed to convince millions of Americans that when any mention of gun regulations are brought up (even if it’s something as simple as universal background checks) the side pushing for those regulations is filled with anti-American radicals trying to confiscate guns. Usually with some kind of Hitler reference thrown in for good measure.
7) Create catchy talking points: Whether it’s referring to rich people as “job creators,” the infamous “drill baby drill” or the popular gun talking point “the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun, is a good guy with a gun,” it doesn’t matter if what they’re saying makes any sense – as long as it sounds good.
8) Continually repeat your lies: Republicans are masters at making lies seem true. It’s not enough that they just come up with their propaganda, they have to commit to repeating it over and over and over until even non-conservatives aren’t sure what is or isn’t true. You can bet if it’s a talking point pushed by the GOP or Fox News, even if it makes absolutely no sense, conservatives all across this country will soon be repeating it nearly word for word.
9) Use code words to mask prejudice and bigotry: When they say “we need to secure our border,” what they really mean is “we need to stop Mexicans from coming here.” When they say they’re “protecting religious freedom,” what they’re really saying is that “we want to find a legal means to discriminate against homosexuals.” When they claim they’re “protecting women’s health,” what they’re really doing is trying to ban abortions. And when they talk about “welfare abuse,” they really mean “minorities on welfare.”
10) Religion: The most important aspect to all of this. Religion has been proven throughout human history, and even now, to be the best mechanism with which to manipulate people. You tie in religion to a political ideology and you can get people to believe pretty much anything. That’s exactly what Republicans do.
So, group all of this together and we get: A fearful, false patriot who despises anyone who’s not just like them; devalues education; loves guns; almost always feels like the world is out to get them; who repeats spoon-fed talking points whether or not they even make sense, all while masking their intolerance with code words and justifying all of this because their party is the party fighting for “Christian values.”
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the recipe for creating the typical mindless conservative zombie.

BTW, Ben Carson has declared as a Republican candidate.
Not yet.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/politicians/carson.asp

Sounds familiar - I recognize a couple of posters in here......
The 10 Step Republican Process for Creating the Perfect Mindless Conservative Zombie
I’ve hit a point in political discourse where much of the time I teeter on the edge of anger and laughter when dealing with conservatives. To me, many conservatives don’t behave like people who follow a political party, but rather like individuals who have joined a cult. And while many people often seem shocked at how so many Americans continue to vote against their own interests, it’s really not as complicated as it might seem.
You see, Republicans have developed a great scheme for creating the perfect brainless conservative zombie. Someone who just grunts out right-wing talking points, without a thought in the world as to whether or not there’s any reality to support them, who strolls through the political world aimlessly waiting for someone to tell them what to think or do. So I thought I’d explain how this process works.
1) Use fear: It’s human nature to fear the unknown or resist change (out of fear of it). And fear is a great emotion to exploit to make people act irrationally.
2) Attack education: Facts show the more educated someone is, the less likely they’re going to be conservative. A well-informed electorate is bad news for Republicans.
3) Use a lot of patriotic propaganda: Take it from someone who deals with conservatives constantly, they really do believe liberals hate America and that they’re the beacon of patriotism. Which is ironic considering the only time you really see anyone promote secession from the United States, they’re from the conservative political spectrum. They think flying an American flag at their home, shouting “God bless America” whenever they get the chance and loving guns makes them “patriotic.” But all they’ve done is wrapped a flag around their ignorance while calling it patriotism.
4) Find things to hate: Conservatives hate a lot. Be it immigrants, non-Christian religions, minorities or the poor – they have a seemingly endless list of people or groups they despise. Hate is a great tool that’s often used to unify and justify ignorance.
5) Make themselves into the victim: Whether it’s the media, Hollywood, science, environmentalists, teachers, unions – conservatives are always the ones who it seems the entire world is out to “get.” Well, at least according to them.
6) Promote guns: It never ceases to shock me how Americans are so obsessed with guns. All conservatives had to do was decide that no matter how many thousands of Americans were slaughtered every year by guns – they were going to endlessly promote guns. They’ve managed to convince millions of Americans that when any mention of gun regulations are brought up (even if it’s something as simple as universal background checks) the side pushing for those regulations is filled with anti-American radicals trying to confiscate guns. Usually with some kind of Hitler reference thrown in for good measure.
7) Create catchy talking points: Whether it’s referring to rich people as “job creators,” the infamous “drill baby drill” or the popular gun talking point “the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun, is a good guy with a gun,” it doesn’t matter if what they’re saying makes any sense – as long as it sounds good.
8) Continually repeat your lies: Republicans are masters at making lies seem true. It’s not enough that they just come up with their propaganda, they have to commit to repeating it over and over and over until even non-conservatives aren’t sure what is or isn’t true. You can bet if it’s a talking point pushed by the GOP or Fox News, even if it makes absolutely no sense, conservatives all across this country will soon be repeating it nearly word for word.
9) Use code words to mask prejudice and bigotry: When they say “we need to secure our border,” what they really mean is “we need to stop Mexicans from coming here.” When they say they’re “protecting religious freedom,” what they’re really saying is that “we want to find a legal means to discriminate against homosexuals.” When they claim they’re “protecting women’s health,” what they’re really doing is trying to ban abortions. And when they talk about “welfare abuse,” they really mean “minorities on welfare.”
10) Religion: The most important aspect to all of this. Religion has been proven throughout human history, and even now, to be the best mechanism with which to manipulate people. You tie in religion to a political ideology and you can get people to believe pretty much anything. That’s exactly what Republicans do.
So, group all of this together and we get: A fearful, false patriot who despises anyone who’s not just like them; devalues education; loves guns; almost always feels like the world is out to get them; who repeats spoon-fed talking points whether or not they even make sense, all while masking their intolerance with code words and justifying all of this because their party is the party fighting for “Christian values.”
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the recipe for creating the typical mindless conservative zombie.
________________________________
Those conservative zombies just whipped liberal a$$ at every level of government.

I know you guys hate this site but its still interesting
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/11/07/obstruction-and-how-the-press-helped-punch-the/201494
Obstruction And How The Press Helped Punch The GOP's Midterm Ticket
Five Years Of Enabling Radical Gridlock
Blog ››› 27 minutes ago ››› ERIC BOEHLERT
In the days after the midterm elections, the New York Times has been a cornucopia of campaign commentary. Lots of attention is being paid to the issue of gridlock, which has defined Washington, D.C. since President Obama was first inaugurated.
Lamenting America's "broken politics," Times columnist Nicholas Kristof opted for the both-sides-are-to-blame model, suggesting that, "Critics are right that [Obama] should try harder to schmooze with legislators." Across from Kristof on the Times opinion page, Republican pollster Frank Luntz urged Obama to find a way to create "common-sense solutions" with his Republican counterparts. (This, despite the fact that Luntz in 2009 helped Republicans craft their trademark strategy of obstructing Obama at every turn.)
And the same day, while reviewing Chuck Todd's new book on Obama, which stressed that the president "wanted to soar above partisanship" though his two terms will likely "be remembered as a nadir of partisan relations," the Times book critic stressed Obama's "reluctance to reach out to Congress and members of both parties to engage in the sort of forceful horse trading (like Lyndon B. Johnson's) and dogged retail politics (like Bill Clinton's) that might have helped forge more legislative deals and build public consensus."
So after six years of radical, blanketed reticence from the GOP, we're still repeatedly reading in the New York Times that while Republicans have put up road blocks, if Obama would just try harder, Republicans might cooperate with him. You can almost hear the frustration seeping through the pages of the Times: 'What is wrong with this guy? Bipartisanship is so simple. Republicans say they want to work with the White House, so why doesn't Obama just do it?'
Indeed, cooperation is simple if you purposefully ignore reality--if you downplay the fact the Republican Party is acting in a way that defies all historic norms. If you adopt that fantasy version of Beltway politics today (i.e. the GOP is filled with honest brokers just waiting to work with the White House), then it's easy to dissect the problems, and it's easy to file both-sides-are-to-blame columns that urge bipartisan cooperation.
What's trickier, apparently, is speaking truth to power and accurately portraying what has happened to American politics and noting without equivocation that the sabotage that has occurred is designed to ensure the federal government doesn't function as designed, and that it cannot efficiently address the problems of the nation.
And this week, it all paid off for Republicans. "Obstruction has just been rewarded, in a huge way," wrote Michael Tomasky at The Daily Beast.
Led by Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Republicans vowed in 2009 to oppose every political move Obama made, not matter how sweeping or how minor. "To prevent Obama from becoming the hero who fixed Washington, McConnell decided to break it. And it worked," wrote Matthew Yglesias at Vox, in the wake of the midterm election results. New York's Jonathan Chait made a similar observation about McConnell: "His single strategic insight is that voters do not blame Congress for gridlock, they blame the president, and therefore reward the opposition."
But why? Why don't voters blame Congress for gridlock?
Why would the president, who's had virtually his entire agenda categorically obstructed, be blamed and not the politicians who purposefully plot the gridlock? Because the press has given Republicans a pass. For more than five years, too many Beltway pundits and reporters have treated the spectacular stalemate as if it were everyday politics; just more "partisan combat." It's not. It's extraordinary. (See here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here.)
Note the press complaint Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-CA) logged four years ago. It was about how timid the news media were in covering Republican obstructionism. Her critique still applies today:
You guys don't write about [it], and this is what they do. I don't see it, and I take five newspapers. I don't see it on the tube, and I don't see it anywhere. It's obstruction. It's obfuscation. It's bringing the body to a halt and it's been done dozens of times. And this is one more of those times... and they haven't gotten much criticism for it clearly or they would have stopped it.
On paper, the GOP's desperate maneuver in 2009 looked risky: Just gum up the works of Congress and stand in the way of every proposal from the new president who was just swept into office with a public mandate for change? Wouldn't commentators clobber the GOP for blind partisanship and hollow obstruction?
Looking back though, there was very little risk involved. There was no element of chance because within days of Obama being sworn into office, the Beltway press sent out clarion call: If Republicans don't cooperate with the new, wildly popular president, it's the president's fault.
And that press judgment hasn't budged since 2009.
If you think I'm exaggerating about this phenomenon taking root within days of Obama's first term, just go back to the White House's January 23, 2009 press conference. That's when NBC's Chuck Todd asked the new president if he would veto his own party's stimulus bill if not enough Republicans voted in support of it.
Todd's weird query highlighted the unheard-of double standard constructed almost overnight by the press with regard to the pressing issue of bipartisanship: If there was little or no bipartisan support for Obama's stimulus package, then it was Obama's fault, his fault alone, and the bill itself must be a P.R. failure.
Sure, the legislation might help save the collapsing economy at the time. (Fact: It did.) But in terms of optics and how it looked, the emergency stimulus bill was a loser. Why? Republicans didn't like it. The party that had just been pushed out of office didn't support the bill, so the press declared it to be an Obama failure and a key Republican victory.
"Republicans find their voice," cheered Politico after the GOP snubbed Obama weeks into his first term. The Los Angeles Times reported in January 2009, "t was clear that [Obama's] efforts so far had not delivered the post-partisan era that he called for in his inauguration address." Meaning, nine days after being sworn in, Obama still hadn't ushered in a "post-partisan era."
Five years later the simple question remains: If Republicans emphatically do not want to cooperate in any meaningful way with Democrats, is there anything Obama can do to change that? Answer: No, not really. But according to the press, Obama is supposed to change that equation, or else he loses. He takes all of the blame.
That's how the game has been played since early 2009. And that's the dynamic Republicans just rode to midterm victory.
_____________________________________________
MediaMatters?
One of the political action groups financed by Obama’s biggest supporter George Soros, the French socialist billionaire?
Almost as sad as the job growth under obama’s failed economy.
Over 70% of the jobs obama claims he created are part time and or very low wage.Every liberal seems to be posting answers to the “Why” by cutting and pasting leftwing media.
Does any liberal have a clue as to why obama’s policies and reid and the democrats lost at every level of government Tuesday?
Because of people like you. You know, low info voters.
________________________________
Yea, everyone is stupid except the liberals who can't explain why they got their a$$'s kicked.
If you knew anything at all, you would know that the party in power always does poorly in midterm elections. Nobody seems surprised at that other than you. Everyone but you seems to understand that. You, being uneducated and low info, do not understand it.
But keep ranting. I am enjoying the hell out of that. 😛
If you actually believe that routine mid term results for the party in the White House explains this debacle you are really in deep deep denial.

You are not a smart as you think you are.
The only bs is your weak analysis that has no basis in reality.
And yet between the two of you, not a single rational thought to disprove anything I said.
You stated an opinion with nothing to back it up. To use a line you used, I am not going to do your research for you.
__________________________________________________
The People know exactly why obama and reid and the democrats were rejected.
Not one liberal here has yet to state why.
That in and of itself is yet another reason the liberals lost the election at every level of government.Tough to look failure in the face ain't it?
This discussion had absolutely nothing to do with the election. However, your inability to know what words should be capitalized and which shouldn't is just another glimpse into your lack of grasp of language and grammar. It is ironic when you ridicule others intelligence. 😛
_________________________________________
I capitalize or not that which I choose and for a specific reason and the reason should be obvious to even you with your public school education.
Speaking of a specific reason, you still have not stated your reason for obama, reid and the democrats complete humiliation on election day.
Are you simply incapable of independent thought?
I answered that as did a few others. What is with the shots at public education? I am sure there are more than a few on here who had a public school education, both liberal and conservative. If you are a product of private school education, you are a poster boy for money wasted on education. Ypour parents must be so proud and happy about the failed investment. 😛
_______________________________________
Your poor education is obvious.
Keep on losing son.Still cant' articulate why you are all in for Hillary or why obama, reid and the democrats lost at every level of government?
We are in for Hillary because she is a moderate and can and will win in 2016 because the GOP has nobody even remotely on the radar that can beat her. You and the other conservatives are unsure of yourselves you are afraid to even speculate who might run against her. Pretty much sums up your Presidential candidate pool.
And the Dems lost at all levels of Government? Really? Did I miss Obama being deposed as President of the United States?
Enjoy your hollow victory Mule as nothing will change for the next two years. you want to know why? I have one word for you VETO!
______________________
Well, that is your opinion based on not facts at all.
Again I ask: why are all the liberals all in for no-resume Hillary?
Do you expect her to run unopposed?
She couldn't even get her parties nomination the last time she ran.
Considering the Republicans are still trying to figure out who they have that might actually beat her you would be correct. They are so bankrupt of candidates even Mitt Romney's name has been floated to the press as a possible candidate. And if I was Mitt who can blame him when he sees there is nobody on the GOP horizon why not run again?
And you do realize that the Democratic primaries are voted on by Democrats and a small percentage of Independents and not the whole country right? And you also remember the person she lost too was elected and reelected to a second term as President right? And based on the campaign Romney ran IMHO even she could have beaten that stiff.
So if we can believe the current major polls Hillary has the support of over 60% of the Democratic voter base so do you think any Liberal voter will vote against her if she runs in 2016? And do you think she will lose the women, minority, and Gay voter base to the GOP?
Since all you conservatives can't seem to come up with a name of a GOP candidate who has a chance to beat her I figured I would help you with some possibilities. So which of these possible candidates could beat her in your expert opinions?
Come on who has the guts to take a stand and make a prediction?
http://www.politics1.com/p2016.htm
And if you don't think the GOP is split take a look at these percentages for the possible candidates
Nobody has more then 20% in any of the polls with Rand Paul the slight favorite to date. I have to say I am really looking forward to the GOP debates in 2016 as the last round in 2012 were incredibly entertaining.
[Edited on 11/10/2014 by Bill_Graham]

I know you guys hate this site but its still interesting
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/11/07/obstruction-and-how-the-press-helped-punch-the/201494
Obstruction And How The Press Helped Punch The GOP's Midterm Ticket
Five Years Of Enabling Radical Gridlock
Blog ››› 27 minutes ago ››› ERIC BOEHLERT
In the days after the midterm elections, the New York Times has been a cornucopia of campaign commentary. Lots of attention is being paid to the issue of gridlock, which has defined Washington, D.C. since President Obama was first inaugurated.
Lamenting America's "broken politics," Times columnist Nicholas Kristof opted for the both-sides-are-to-blame model, suggesting that, "Critics are right that [Obama] should try harder to schmooze with legislators." Across from Kristof on the Times opinion page, Republican pollster Frank Luntz urged Obama to find a way to create "common-sense solutions" with his Republican counterparts. (This, despite the fact that Luntz in 2009 helped Republicans craft their trademark strategy of obstructing Obama at every turn.)
And the same day, while reviewing Chuck Todd's new book on Obama, which stressed that the president "wanted to soar above partisanship" though his two terms will likely "be remembered as a nadir of partisan relations," the Times book critic stressed Obama's "reluctance to reach out to Congress and members of both parties to engage in the sort of forceful horse trading (like Lyndon B. Johnson's) and dogged retail politics (like Bill Clinton's) that might have helped forge more legislative deals and build public consensus."
So after six years of radical, blanketed reticence from the GOP, we're still repeatedly reading in the New York Times that while Republicans have put up road blocks, if Obama would just try harder, Republicans might cooperate with him. You can almost hear the frustration seeping through the pages of the Times: 'What is wrong with this guy? Bipartisanship is so simple. Republicans say they want to work with the White House, so why doesn't Obama just do it?'
Indeed, cooperation is simple if you purposefully ignore reality--if you downplay the fact the Republican Party is acting in a way that defies all historic norms. If you adopt that fantasy version of Beltway politics today (i.e. the GOP is filled with honest brokers just waiting to work with the White House), then it's easy to dissect the problems, and it's easy to file both-sides-are-to-blame columns that urge bipartisan cooperation.
What's trickier, apparently, is speaking truth to power and accurately portraying what has happened to American politics and noting without equivocation that the sabotage that has occurred is designed to ensure the federal government doesn't function as designed, and that it cannot efficiently address the problems of the nation.
And this week, it all paid off for Republicans. "Obstruction has just been rewarded, in a huge way," wrote Michael Tomasky at The Daily Beast.
Led by Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Republicans vowed in 2009 to oppose every political move Obama made, not matter how sweeping or how minor. "To prevent Obama from becoming the hero who fixed Washington, McConnell decided to break it. And it worked," wrote Matthew Yglesias at Vox, in the wake of the midterm election results. New York's Jonathan Chait made a similar observation about McConnell: "His single strategic insight is that voters do not blame Congress for gridlock, they blame the president, and therefore reward the opposition."
But why? Why don't voters blame Congress for gridlock?
Why would the president, who's had virtually his entire agenda categorically obstructed, be blamed and not the politicians who purposefully plot the gridlock? Because the press has given Republicans a pass. For more than five years, too many Beltway pundits and reporters have treated the spectacular stalemate as if it were everyday politics; just more "partisan combat." It's not. It's extraordinary. (See here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here.)
Note the press complaint Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-CA) logged four years ago. It was about how timid the news media were in covering Republican obstructionism. Her critique still applies today:
You guys don't write about [it], and this is what they do. I don't see it, and I take five newspapers. I don't see it on the tube, and I don't see it anywhere. It's obstruction. It's obfuscation. It's bringing the body to a halt and it's been done dozens of times. And this is one more of those times... and they haven't gotten much criticism for it clearly or they would have stopped it.
On paper, the GOP's desperate maneuver in 2009 looked risky: Just gum up the works of Congress and stand in the way of every proposal from the new president who was just swept into office with a public mandate for change? Wouldn't commentators clobber the GOP for blind partisanship and hollow obstruction?
Looking back though, there was very little risk involved. There was no element of chance because within days of Obama being sworn into office, the Beltway press sent out clarion call: If Republicans don't cooperate with the new, wildly popular president, it's the president's fault.
And that press judgment hasn't budged since 2009.
If you think I'm exaggerating about this phenomenon taking root within days of Obama's first term, just go back to the White House's January 23, 2009 press conference. That's when NBC's Chuck Todd asked the new president if he would veto his own party's stimulus bill if not enough Republicans voted in support of it.
Todd's weird query highlighted the unheard-of double standard constructed almost overnight by the press with regard to the pressing issue of bipartisanship: If there was little or no bipartisan support for Obama's stimulus package, then it was Obama's fault, his fault alone, and the bill itself must be a P.R. failure.
Sure, the legislation might help save the collapsing economy at the time. (Fact: It did.) But in terms of optics and how it looked, the emergency stimulus bill was a loser. Why? Republicans didn't like it. The party that had just been pushed out of office didn't support the bill, so the press declared it to be an Obama failure and a key Republican victory.
"Republicans find their voice," cheered Politico after the GOP snubbed Obama weeks into his first term. The Los Angeles Times reported in January 2009, "t was clear that [Obama's] efforts so far had not delivered the post-partisan era that he called for in his inauguration address." Meaning, nine days after being sworn in, Obama still hadn't ushered in a "post-partisan era."
Five years later the simple question remains: If Republicans emphatically do not want to cooperate in any meaningful way with Democrats, is there anything Obama can do to change that? Answer: No, not really. But according to the press, Obama is supposed to change that equation, or else he loses. He takes all of the blame.
That's how the game has been played since early 2009. And that's the dynamic Republicans just rode to midterm victory.
_____________________________________________
MediaMatters?
One of the political action groups financed by Obama’s biggest supporter George Soros, the French socialist billionaire?
Almost as sad as the job growth under obama’s failed economy.
Over 70% of the jobs obama claims he created are part time and or very low wage.Every liberal seems to be posting answers to the “Why” by cutting and pasting leftwing media.
Does any liberal have a clue as to why obama’s policies and reid and the democrats lost at every level of government Tuesday?
Because of people like you. You know, low info voters.
________________________________
Yea, everyone is stupid except the liberals who can't explain why they got their a$$'s kicked.
If you knew anything at all, you would know that the party in power always does poorly in midterm elections. Nobody seems surprised at that other than you. Everyone but you seems to understand that. You, being uneducated and low info, do not understand it.
But keep ranting. I am enjoying the hell out of that. 😛
If you actually believe that routine mid term results for the party in the White House explains this debacle you are really in deep deep denial.
Considering history backs his assertion I would say you are the one in denial.
In the last 80 years, since 1934, the party that had the Presidency has only gained seats 3 X in the House and 5X in the Senate so I would say there is nothing unusual in the GOP gaining this past election. As I have said numerous times turnover is cyclical. Don't believe me or think I am lying these are the facts not an opinion.
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/data/mid-term_elections.php
[Edited on 11/10/2014 by Bill_Graham]

Unless we can admit that neither side has the perfect answer and that both political parties are full of self serving hacks, we will keep being divided against ourselves over artificial ideological divides and nothing will ever change. You guys talk to each other like employees of these jerks instead of talking to the political hacks like they work for you.

Unless we can admit that neither side has the perfect answer and that both political parties are full of self serving hacks, we will keep being divided against ourselves over artificial ideological divides and nothing will ever change. You guys talk to each other like employees of these jerks instead of talking to the political hacks like they work for you.
All politicians are the bitches of Big Business that fund their campaigns Doug. The middle class in America has been eroding for decades and sadly I think we will be a country of have's and have not's for the foreseeable future.
I vote Democat as I see them as the lesser of two evils but don't think for a minute they are the solution to all our problems.

{quote}There is some, albeit a sliver of common ground to work on. I think it's possible to get some infrastructure work done, for instance. You want to see Obama veto that? {quote}
I could certainly see him vetoing that depending on what the Republicans ask for in return for it. If it is a straight up infrastructure bill, fine, sign it tomorrow. Obama has had an infrastructure bill on the table for years just sign it. If they want to link it to tax breaks foir the wealthy then he can veto away for all I care.
Tax cuts for the wealthy and for profitable corporations should only be given if they are directly linked to job creation and not traded for other legislation. In other words they get X amount of tax breaks for ex amount of jobs created whether that be jobs brought back that had been outsourced or brand new jobs. Profitable corporations should get penalized for outsourcing and rewarded for producing and securing American middle class jobs.

I know you guys hate this site but its still interesting
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/11/07/obstruction-and-how-the-press-helped-punch-the/201494
Obstruction And How The Press Helped Punch The GOP's Midterm Ticket
Five Years Of Enabling Radical Gridlock
Blog ››› 27 minutes ago ››› ERIC BOEHLERT
In the days after the midterm elections, the New York Times has been a cornucopia of campaign commentary. Lots of attention is being paid to the issue of gridlock, which has defined Washington, D.C. since President Obama was first inaugurated.
Lamenting America's "broken politics," Times columnist Nicholas Kristof opted for the both-sides-are-to-blame model, suggesting that, "Critics are right that [Obama] should try harder to schmooze with legislators." Across from Kristof on the Times opinion page, Republican pollster Frank Luntz urged Obama to find a way to create "common-sense solutions" with his Republican counterparts. (This, despite the fact that Luntz in 2009 helped Republicans craft their trademark strategy of obstructing Obama at every turn.)
And the same day, while reviewing Chuck Todd's new book on Obama, which stressed that the president "wanted to soar above partisanship" though his two terms will likely "be remembered as a nadir of partisan relations," the Times book critic stressed Obama's "reluctance to reach out to Congress and members of both parties to engage in the sort of forceful horse trading (like Lyndon B. Johnson's) and dogged retail politics (like Bill Clinton's) that might have helped forge more legislative deals and build public consensus."
So after six years of radical, blanketed reticence from the GOP, we're still repeatedly reading in the New York Times that while Republicans have put up road blocks, if Obama would just try harder, Republicans might cooperate with him. You can almost hear the frustration seeping through the pages of the Times: 'What is wrong with this guy? Bipartisanship is so simple. Republicans say they want to work with the White House, so why doesn't Obama just do it?'
Indeed, cooperation is simple if you purposefully ignore reality--if you downplay the fact the Republican Party is acting in a way that defies all historic norms. If you adopt that fantasy version of Beltway politics today (i.e. the GOP is filled with honest brokers just waiting to work with the White House), then it's easy to dissect the problems, and it's easy to file both-sides-are-to-blame columns that urge bipartisan cooperation.
What's trickier, apparently, is speaking truth to power and accurately portraying what has happened to American politics and noting without equivocation that the sabotage that has occurred is designed to ensure the federal government doesn't function as designed, and that it cannot efficiently address the problems of the nation.
And this week, it all paid off for Republicans. "Obstruction has just been rewarded, in a huge way," wrote Michael Tomasky at The Daily Beast.
Led by Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Republicans vowed in 2009 to oppose every political move Obama made, not matter how sweeping or how minor. "To prevent Obama from becoming the hero who fixed Washington, McConnell decided to break it. And it worked," wrote Matthew Yglesias at Vox, in the wake of the midterm election results. New York's Jonathan Chait made a similar observation about McConnell: "His single strategic insight is that voters do not blame Congress for gridlock, they blame the president, and therefore reward the opposition."
But why? Why don't voters blame Congress for gridlock?
Why would the president, who's had virtually his entire agenda categorically obstructed, be blamed and not the politicians who purposefully plot the gridlock? Because the press has given Republicans a pass. For more than five years, too many Beltway pundits and reporters have treated the spectacular stalemate as if it were everyday politics; just more "partisan combat." It's not. It's extraordinary. (See here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here.)
Note the press complaint Sen. Diane Feinstein (D-CA) logged four years ago. It was about how timid the news media were in covering Republican obstructionism. Her critique still applies today:
You guys don't write about [it], and this is what they do. I don't see it, and I take five newspapers. I don't see it on the tube, and I don't see it anywhere. It's obstruction. It's obfuscation. It's bringing the body to a halt and it's been done dozens of times. And this is one more of those times... and they haven't gotten much criticism for it clearly or they would have stopped it.
On paper, the GOP's desperate maneuver in 2009 looked risky: Just gum up the works of Congress and stand in the way of every proposal from the new president who was just swept into office with a public mandate for change? Wouldn't commentators clobber the GOP for blind partisanship and hollow obstruction?
Looking back though, there was very little risk involved. There was no element of chance because within days of Obama being sworn into office, the Beltway press sent out clarion call: If Republicans don't cooperate with the new, wildly popular president, it's the president's fault.
And that press judgment hasn't budged since 2009.
If you think I'm exaggerating about this phenomenon taking root within days of Obama's first term, just go back to the White House's January 23, 2009 press conference. That's when NBC's Chuck Todd asked the new president if he would veto his own party's stimulus bill if not enough Republicans voted in support of it.
Todd's weird query highlighted the unheard-of double standard constructed almost overnight by the press with regard to the pressing issue of bipartisanship: If there was little or no bipartisan support for Obama's stimulus package, then it was Obama's fault, his fault alone, and the bill itself must be a P.R. failure.
Sure, the legislation might help save the collapsing economy at the time. (Fact: It did.) But in terms of optics and how it looked, the emergency stimulus bill was a loser. Why? Republicans didn't like it. The party that had just been pushed out of office didn't support the bill, so the press declared it to be an Obama failure and a key Republican victory.
"Republicans find their voice," cheered Politico after the GOP snubbed Obama weeks into his first term. The Los Angeles Times reported in January 2009, "t was clear that [Obama's] efforts so far had not delivered the post-partisan era that he called for in his inauguration address." Meaning, nine days after being sworn in, Obama still hadn't ushered in a "post-partisan era."
Five years later the simple question remains: If Republicans emphatically do not want to cooperate in any meaningful way with Democrats, is there anything Obama can do to change that? Answer: No, not really. But according to the press, Obama is supposed to change that equation, or else he loses. He takes all of the blame.
That's how the game has been played since early 2009. And that's the dynamic Republicans just rode to midterm victory.
_____________________________________________
MediaMatters?
One of the political action groups financed by Obama’s biggest supporter George Soros, the French socialist billionaire?
Almost as sad as the job growth under obama’s failed economy.
Over 70% of the jobs obama claims he created are part time and or very low wage.Every liberal seems to be posting answers to the “Why” by cutting and pasting leftwing media.
Does any liberal have a clue as to why obama’s policies and reid and the democrats lost at every level of government Tuesday?
Because of people like you. You know, low info voters.
________________________________
Yea, everyone is stupid except the liberals who can't explain why they got their a$$'s kicked.
If you knew anything at all, you would know that the party in power always does poorly in midterm elections. Nobody seems surprised at that other than you. Everyone but you seems to understand that. You, being uneducated and low info, do not understand it.
But keep ranting. I am enjoying the hell out of that. 😛
If you actually believe that routine mid term results for the party in the White House explains this debacle you are really in deep deep denial.
Considering history backs his assertion I would say you are the one in denial.
In the last 80 years, since 1934, the party that had the Presidency has only gained seats 3 X in the House and 5X in the Senate so I would say there is nothing unusual in the GOP gaining this past election. As I have said numerous times turnover is cyclical. Don't believe me or think I am lying these are the facts not an opinion.
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/data/mid-term_elections.php
[Edited on 11/10/2014 by Bill_Graham]
________________________________________________
Your “analysis” of past elections matters not. It puts no money in the people’s pockets nor does it restore their civil rights.
Today is today and history while exactly that, is history, doesn’t help the average American who’s income has declined under obama and the democrats and the people are hurting more than they were six years ago.
We have less money in our pockets, less freedoms and are under the thumb of big government and its regulation of every aspect of a citizen’s life.
The policies of obama and the democrats were rejected by The American People on election day and will continue for at least the next two years as obama has no respect for the law not the peoples wishes.
The worst president in over 50 years will go down in history as a complete failure.

There is some, albeit a sliver of common ground to work on. I think it's possible to get some infrastructure work done, for instance. You want to see Obama veto that?
Then why didn't they pass it in say, the last 6 years? He said he wanted jobs bills and infrastructure bills..........
[Edited on 11/6/2014 by Sang]
Bingo!!!! The Republicans are full of cr_p!!! They will try to roll the President into trading infrastructure for tax cuts for wealthy and profitable corporations. If Obama falls for that he will come out on the losing end for sure and the middle class will suffer further. The GOP now want infrastructure??? Fine, sign the infrastructure bill that has been sitting there waiting to be signed for years!!! Just the infrastructure bill though. No trade offs for tax cuts or anything else. If everyone agrees we need infrastructure work then it shouldn't have to be linked to anything else. Just sign the bill and get going fixing our crumbling infrastructure and boost job growth.
Don't worry Republicans, we will give you part of the credit for helping all Americans by fixing and improving our infrastructure. Your boogy man won't get all of the positive credit which we know you fear otherwise you would have signed the bill years ago and the unemployment rate would be even lower than it is and the economy would be better than it is.
- 75 Forums
- 15 K Topics
- 192.1 K Posts
- 4 Online
- 24.7 K Members