So...let me get this straight...liberals claim that it was wrong and unconstitutional for the southern states to secede from the "sacred" union and form the Confederate States of America. They also thought that it was morally justified for Lincoln's armies to murder, rape and pillage their way through the south in order to "preserve the Union" and stop the secession of the southern states. But they are OK with California seceding? The ignorance and hypocrisy of the Left never ceases to amaze...
P.S. I did not vote for Donald or Hillary, I despise both parties, and I fully support any states right to peacefully and voluntarily secede.
__________________________________________________________________________
"California Wants to Leave the U.S."
Sounds like the celebrities that "threatened to leave the U.S. if Donald trump becomes President", none of which did of course, and a handful of other Berkley kids have been elevated into "California".
Nobody cares and it will not happen.
Anyone notice that none of the so-called celebrities were going to move to Mexico?
I'm still waiting for you to name one economist who doesn't think Trump's tax plan will add to the national debt. You can make it easy on yourself and just admit that there aren't any.
_______________________________________________________________________
World renown economists supporting Donald Trump's Economic and Tax plans:
Lawrence Kudlow
Arthur Laffer
Stephen Moore
David Autor, MIT- source - The Economy for the next four years seminar - National Press Club, Washington DC - October 3, 2016
Still unable or unwilling to post California's actual debt?
I just posted California's debt, but I didn't see any of those economists actually say that Trump's tax plan was not going to add trillions to the debt.
________________________________________________________________________
And they did not say Donald Trump's plan would add trillions to the debt.
The question was about California's debt.
then you went to "who doesn't think Trump's tax plan will add to the national debt"
Then you went to "add trillions to the debt"You can try to keep changing the premise of the question but that will not change the facts.
When wrong, changing the question simply demonstrates you are searching in the dark for anything you can throw at Donald Trump.You should try to get a job with the Corrupt News Network as a B/S/ commenter.
They are experiencing turnover.Poor Dummy. 😛
I answered his question. I am still waiting for an ensure from him, but honestly I don't care. I doubt he could afford to live in California anyway, which is fine with me.
So...let me get this straight...liberals claim that it was wrong and unconstitutional for the southern states to secede from the "sacred" union and form the Confederate States of America. They also thought that it was morally justified for Lincoln's armies to murder, rape and pillage their way through the south in order to "preserve the Union" and stop the secession of the southern states. But they are OK with California seceding? The ignorance and hypocrisy of the Left never ceases to amaze...
P.S. I did not vote for Donald or Hillary, I despise both parties, and I fully support any states right to peacefully and voluntarily secede.
__________________________________________________________________________
"California Wants to Leave the U.S."
Sounds like the celebrities that "threatened to leave the U.S. if Donald trump becomes President", none of which did of course, and a handful of other Berkley kids have been elevated into "California".
Nobody cares and it will not happen.
Anyone notice that none of the so-called celebrities were going to move to Mexico?
I'm still waiting for you to name one economist who doesn't think Trump's tax plan will add to the national debt. You can make it easy on yourself and just admit that there aren't any.
_______________________________________________________________________
World renown economists supporting Donald Trump's Economic and Tax plans:
Lawrence Kudlow
Arthur Laffer
Stephen Moore
David Autor, MIT- source - The Economy for the next four years seminar - National Press Club, Washington DC - October 3, 2016
Still unable or unwilling to post California's actual debt?
I just posted California's debt, but I didn't see any of those economists actually say that Trump's tax plan was not going to add trillions to the debt.
________________________________________________________________________
And they did not say Donald Trump's plan would add trillions to the debt.
The question was about California's debt.
then you went to "who doesn't think Trump's tax plan will add to the national debt"
Then you went to "add trillions to the debt"You can try to keep changing the premise of the question but that will not change the facts.
When wrong, changing the question simply demonstrates you are searching in the dark for anything you can throw at Donald Trump.You should try to get a job with the Corrupt News Network as a B/S/ commenter.
They are experiencing turnover.Poor Dummy. 😛
I answered his question. I am still waiting for an ensure from him, but honestly I don't care. I doubt he could afford to live in California anyway, which is fine with me.
________________________________________________________________________
And how long did it take you to answer the question you tried so hard to admit?
Isn't this the part in the movie where you global warming idiots call out for the disgraced Al Gore to come save you from yourselves?
Okay, the hoax was called global warming until that was proven to be a farce to you changed the label to climate change.
The rest of us call it "The Weather" but you have fun and go bow before your master fools.
It look like pops can finally get his dream job in California sniffing out cow farts:
California is cracking down on cow farts
The Associated Press - Mashable•November 29, 2016
California is taking its fight against global warming to the farm. The nation's leading agricultural state is now targeting greenhouse gases produced by dairy cows and other livestock.
Despite strong opposition from farmers, Gov. Jerry Brown signed legislation in September that for the first time regulates heat-trapping gases from livestock operations and landfills.
Cattle and other farm animals are major sources of methane, a greenhouse gas many times more potent than carbon dioxide as a heat-trapping gas. Methane is released when they belch, pass gas and make manure.
"If we can reduce emissions of methane, we can really help to slow global warming," said Ryan McCarthy, a science advisor for the California Air Resources Board, which is drawing up rules to implement the new law.
Livestock are responsible for 14.5 percent of human-induced greenhouse gas emissions, with beef and dairy production accounting for the bulk of it, according to a 2013 United Nations report.
Since the passage of its landmark global warming law in 2006, California has been reducing carbon emissions from cars, trucks, homes and factories, while boosting production of renewable energy.
In the nation's largest milk-producing state, the new law requires dairies and other livestock operations to reduce methane emissions 40 percent below 2013 levels by 2030. State officials are developing the regulations, which take effect in 2024.
"We expect that this package ... and everything we're doing on climate, does show an effective model forward for others," McCarthy said.
But dairy farmers say the new regulations will drive up costs when they're already struggling with five years of drought, low milk prices and rising labor costs. They're also concerned about a newly signed law that will boost overtime pay for farmworkers.
"Enteric fermentation" is the digestive process by which cow and other livestock break down food and emit methane.
"It just makes it more challenging. We're continuing to lose dairies. Dairies are moving out of state to places where these costs don't exist," said Paul Sousa, director of environmental services for Western United Dairymen.
The dairy industry could be forced to move production to states and countries with fewer regulations, leading to higher emissions globally, Sousa said.
"We think it's very foolish for the state of California to be taking this position," said Rob Vandenheuvel, general manager for the Milk Producers Council. "A single state like California is not going to make a meaningful impact on the climate."
Regulators are looking for ways to reduce so-called enteric emissions — methane from the bodily functions of cows. That could eventually require changes to what cattle eat.
But the biggest target is dairy manure, which accounts for about a quarter of the state's methane emissions. State regulators want more farmers to reduce emissions with methane digesters, which capture methane from manure in large storage tanks and convert the gas into electricity.
The state has set aside $50 million to help dairies set up digesters, but farmers say that's not nearly enough to equip the state's roughly 1,500 dairies.
New Hope Dairy, which has 1,500 cows in Sacramento County, installed a $4 million methane digester in 2013, thanks to state grants and a partnership with the local utility, which operates the system to generate renewable power for the grid.
But co-owner Arlin Van Groningen, a third-generation farmer, says he couldn't afford one if he had to buy and run it himself.
"The bottom line is it's going to negatively impact the economics of the California dairy industry," Van Groningen said of the new law. "In the dairy business, the margins are so slim that something like this will force us out of state."
State officials say they're committed to making sure the new regulations work for farmers and the environment.
"There's a real opportunity here to get very significant emissions reductions at fairly low cost, and actually in a way that can bring economic benefits to farmers," Ryan said.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/california-cracking-down-cow-farts-155744555.html
i am all for any methods to recycle the by products of farming or livestock, but against unecessary taxes or arbitrary fees
During the Moore years of James Bond, there was a movie where the villain planted nuclear bombs along the San Andreas Fault to cause the "big one" and make inland California oceanfront property.
Could happen.
During the Moore years of James Bond, there was a movie where the villain planted nuclear bombs along the San Andreas Fault to cause the "big one" and make inland California oceanfront property.
Could happen.
Wasn't that Superman:The Movie? Lex Luthor?
During the Moore years of James Bond, there was a movie where the villain planted nuclear bombs along the San Andreas Fault to cause the "big one" and make inland California oceanfront property.
Could happen.
You're thinking of Lex Luthor, in Superman: The Movie (Max Zorin's plan was to bomb the fault line in SF in order to flood his competition in Silicon Valley).
But this thread made me think of that too, and every time I hear Warren Zevon's "Desperados Under the Eaves".
Wasn't that Superman:The Movie? Lex Luthor?
Ha, you beat me to it. But seriously, can you imagine an evil real estate mogul gaining power? *shudder*
Wasn't that Superman:The Movie? Lex Luthor?
Ha, you beat me to it. But seriously, can you imagine an evil real estate mogul gaining power? *shudder*
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Yea, after 8 years of an amateur corrupt liar America chose to elect a professional with a proven track record of success.
Yea, after 8 years of an amateur corrupt liar America chose to elect a professional with a proven track record of success.
This is possibly the funniest thing I've ever read in my life. I laughed ,so hard I got coffee on my computer screen. Thanks man.
Yea, after 8 years of an amateur corrupt liar America chose to elect a professional with a proven track record of success.
This is possibly the funniest thing I've ever read in my life. I laughed ,so hard I got coffee on my computer screen. Thanks man.
_________________________________________________________________________________________
Yea, the facts do tend to send some people into delirium.
