Donald Trump Faltering? Die-Hard Fans Refuse to Buy It
http://nyti.ms/2dTFrSO
Apparently, the election is already rigged, all polls are corrupt, and all media- magazines, newspapers, TV news - are biased against Trump. The only real news sources are those of pro-Trump bloggers and commentators like Allen B. West.
I liked the summary by a Wilkes-Barre resident and solid Republican presidential voter "He's going to get slaughtered."
Donald Trump Faltering? Die-Hard Fans Refuse to Buy It
http://nyti.ms/2dTFrSOApparently, the election is already rigged, all polls are corrupt, and all media- magazines, newspapers, TV news - are biased against Trump. The only real news sources are those of pro-Trump bloggers and commentators like Allen B. West.
I liked the summary by a Wilkes-Barre resident and solid Republican presidential voter "He's going to get slaughtered."
"Solid" Republican presidential voter? C'mon now, solid is a kind word to describe an unhinged nut case and total idiot.
Donald Trump Faltering? Die-Hard Fans Refuse to Buy It
http://nyti.ms/2dTFrSOApparently, the election is already rigged, all polls are corrupt, and all media- magazines, newspapers, TV news - are biased against Trump. The only real news sources are those of pro-Trump bloggers and commentators like Allen B. West.
I liked the summary by a Wilkes-Barre resident and solid Republican presidential voter "He's going to get slaughtered."
"Solid" Republican presidential voter? C'mon now, solid is a kind word to describe an unhinged nut case and total idiot.
You are solid.
The media in this country is not independent and everyone knows that. Look into who owns Time Warner, Comcast, etc. (six companies control what you get from your news, which is why I am always reading international).
http://www.businessinsider.com/these-6-corporations-control-90-of-the-media-in-america-2012-6
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concentration_of_media_ownership
http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/democracyondeadline/mediaownership.html
http://www.infowars.com/7-things-about-the-mainstream-media-that-they-do-not-want-you-to-know/
http://feelthebern.org/bernie-sanders-on-media-ownership-and-telecommunications/
REMARKS: So all the media people are against Trump, ninety per cent of the media is controlled by six corporations. The people at the top of those corporations do not want Trump to be elected.
Should they control how Americans vote?
If you have a brain, will you do some research and find out what the candidates actually think, how they have voted, what they want to do if elected or re-elected and then make up your own minds?
I surely will.
The truth will not be suppressed, if we the people rise up to take our country back.
The truth will not be suppressed, if we the people rise up to take our country back.
infowars. No wonder you are so stupid.
Everything is documented on Alex's show. They fact check, so can you with what they present. The top video is part two, the 2nd video is actually Video #1. Watch them in that sequence.
http://www.infowars.com/former-bill-clinton-girlfriend-tells-all/
Dolly Kyle
[Edited on 10/15/2016 by gina]
Everything is documented on Alex's show. They fact check, so can you with what they present. The top video is part two, the 2nd video is actually Video #1. Watch them in that sequence.
http://www.infowars.com/former-bill-clinton-girlfriend-tells-all/
Dolly KyleThere is not a single person of actual intelligence who reads infowarrs. Its for those with feces for brains.
[Edited on 10/15/2016 by gina]
WRONG. Many people read and listen to it, because he states his sources, many of whom are military and intelligence people. He documents and verifies his reports.
WRONG. Many people read and listen to it, because he states his sources, many of whom are military and intelligence people. He documents and verifies his reports.
Wrong again. He is famous for getting his info from "unnamed sources" making his "re[orts" unverified.
Just because he doesn't name all his sources does not mean they do not have names or that they are not from official reports. He doesn't have an editorial newspaper, tv news network team on hand. Most the things he says can be verified, do some leg work, and he says FACT CHECK. He says this at all his speeches, because he is not afraid of that. He does not speak with forked tongue!
Just because he doesn't name all his sources does not mean they do not have names or that they are not from official reports. He doesn't have an editorial newspaper, tv news network team on hand. Most the things he says can be verified, do some leg work, and he says FACT CHECK. He says this at all his speeches, because he is not afraid of that. He does not speak with forked tongue!
An unnamed source is not a credible source.
Just because he doesn't name all his sources does not mean they do not have names or that they are not from official reports. He doesn't have an editorial newspaper, tv news network team on hand. Most the things he says can be verified, do some leg work, and he says FACT CHECK. He says this at all his speeches, because he is not afraid of that. He does not speak with forked tongue!
An unnamed source is not a credible source.
False. Watergate's Deep Throat remained unidentified for 40 years. Is that a good enough example? Aside from that, a named source does not necessarily make it credible. Named sources have spun millions of lies other falsehoods.
Unidentified sources are used regularly and have been utilized as long as journalism has existed.
[Edited on 10/16/2016 by alloak41]
Just because he doesn't name all his sources does not mean they do not have names or that they are not from official reports. He doesn't have an editorial newspaper, tv news network team on hand. Most the things he says can be verified, do some leg work, and he says FACT CHECK. He says this at all his speeches, because he is not afraid of that. He does not speak with forked tongue!
An unnamed source is not a credible source.
You can go to google or any other search engine and get a wide variety of info on anything he mentions and you should. Then you might have your eyes opened. Here's a sample. Blumenthal mentioned in Debate #2.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/22/politics/hillary-clinton-benghazi-sidney-blumenthal/index.html
"Madame Secretary, Mr. Blumenthal wrote you 150 emails. It appears from the materials that we've read all of those reached your desk," Rep. Mike Pompeo said. "Can you tell us why security requests from your professionals ... None of those made it to you. But a man who was a friend of yours who'd never been to Libya, didn't know much about it ... every one of those reports that he sent on to you that had to do with situations on the ground in Libya, those made it to your desk."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/10/23/so-who-is-sidney-blumenthal/
Blumenthal's name came up again and again because his e-mail address filled Clinton's e-mail inbox again and again, before and after the attacks. Between 2011 and 2012, he sent Clinton at least 25 memos consisting of intelligence and strategy reports, advice, articles and even gossip. His memos filled about a third of the nearly 900 pages of e-mails related to Libya released from Clinton's private e-mail server.
So we learned that Clinton never directly corresponded via email with Stevens, who requested armed reinforcements multiple times just before he was killed in the September 11, 2012, attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi. Hillary did, however, regularly correspond with Blementhal about affairs in Libya.
Blumenthal didn’t work for the State Department. In fact, he was persona non grata in the White House. Clinton wanted to hire him, but President Obama refused to allow him to serve under his administration. That didn’t stop her from communicating with him about how things were going in war-torn Libya. Coincidentally, (or not-so-coincidentally) Blumenthal was working as an adviser to a shady business venture that sought to work with Libyan rebels. But more on that later.
Blumenthal had invested in Osprey Global Solutions, a military contractor that wanted to do business with the Libyan rebels.
The Clinton Foundation hired Blumenthal in 2009, despite grumblings from other employees that he only got the job because he was a friend of the Clintons. He was getting paid $10,000 a month while handling the business venture in Libya and urging Clinton to help him out with it in her role as America’s most powerful diplomat.
Clinton apparently cared more about Dear Old Sid’s emails than she did the safety of her diplomats. As Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) pointed out during the third round of Thursday’s committee hearing, she had asked Stevens to read and react to some of Blumenthal’s emails the same day she denied his request for more security at the Libyan embassy. Oh, and he asked for more security because the embassy suffered a bomb attack the day before.
[Edited on 10/16/2016 by gina]
[Edited on 10/16/2016 by gina]
Here's one more, Ed Klein, former New York Times Reporter, has a new book about the Clintons called "Guilty as Sin"
So many people have so many bad things to say about Hillary, but all you hear about is gossip about Trump. I don't think there is enough time to delve into all the questionable deals, etc. on both candidates, what matters is where they stand on the issues and what they will do leadership wise if they are elected.
t
[Edited on 10/17/2016 by gina]
