If anyone had read the actual NYT hit piece they would have noticed that the NYT admits in the article the no evidence exists.

You read the corrupt failing NYT?

Imagine for a second voting for a known compromised Russian asset working against American interests to be our President, and enjoying it, just to spite fellow Americans. In all seriousness, what credibility will the right ever have after doing something so degenerate?

Rudy said no collusion, or did he?

He has tried to walk an all inclusive line. He gets a bad wrap way more than he gets his just due appreciation for what he's trying to do for us all.

Hahaha! Good Laugh!!!!! he is definitely all inclusive!!! Nazi's, white supremists, bigots and pedophiles and traitors to the U.S.A. as long as You support Trumpism, You are in.............Peace.........joe

Rudy said no collusion, or did he?

Fake News (formally known as CNN) mouthpiece Chris Cuomo spun their collusion line to try and include Donald Trump. Rudy Giuliani was quite specific that Donald Trump was the only person he was talking about.

No documents, evidence or actual witness exists that implicates Donald Trump/President Trump in any collusion with Russia.

Rudy said no collusion, or did he?

Rudy is a man running scared. Innumerable "no collusion between the campaign" chants has turned into "sure, there was collusion between the campaign & Russia but not DJT personally." Let's see how long that lasts.

Rudy said no collusion, or did he?

Rudy is a man running scared. Innumerable "no collusion between the campaign" chants has turned into "sure, there was collusion between the campaign & Russia but not DJT personally." Let's see how long that lasts.

It has come a long way from when they said nobody in trump orbit ever spoke with a russian. Right wing bigot radio has been silent on this tonight. No surprise.

Rudy said no collusion, or did he?

Rudy is a man running scared. Innumerable "no collusion between the campaign" chants has turned into "sure, there was collusion between the campaign & Russia but not DJT personally." Let's see how long that lasts.

"sure, there was collusion between the campaign & Russia but not DJT personally."

That is only a snippet during Cuomo's interrupting and spinning.

No documents, evidence or actual witness exists that implicates Donald Trump/President Trump in any collusion with Russia.

I’m i the only one that finds it odd that Muleman watches CNN and reads the NYT?

"sure, there was collusion between the campaign & Russia but not DJT personally."

That is only a snippet during Cuomo's interrupting and spinning.

After 18 months of denial, DJT's personal lawyer ADMITTED collusion between the campaign & Russia. It was pretty mind-blowing for him to have blurted that out. Cuomo, who is a NY attorney, immediately recognized the enormity of the admission (legal term) & probed to see if Guiliani had really said it, undermining his own client's statements.

I didn't type out Guiliani's repetition of that phrase because most people understand that was a "Wow" moment & didn't need to hear it more than once. This is the cherry on top of the public knowing that campaign members are awaiting federal sentencing or are already serving time for conspiring w/Russia.

He is the manchurian canidate. The sharks are circling. The people except for the deporables have had enough. 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😮 😮 😮

"sure, there was collusion between the campaign & Russia but not DJT personally."

That is only a snippet during Cuomo's interrupting and spinning.

After 18 months of denial, DJT's personal lawyer ADMITTED collusion between the campaign & Russia. It was pretty mind-blowing for him to have blurted that out. Cuomo, who is a NY attorney, immediately recognized the enormity of the admission (legal term) & probed to see if Guiliani had really said it, undermining his own client's statements.

I didn't type out Guiliani's repetition of that phrase because most people understand that was a "Wow" moment & didn't need to hear it more than once. This is the cherry on top of the public knowing that campaign members are awaiting federal sentencing or are already serving time for conspiring w/Russia.

No one is "awaiting federal sentencing or are already serving time for conspiring w/Russia" related to the Donald Trump Campaign or Presidency.

Did you write that lie or just copy/paste it from the corrupt liberal media?

No one is "awaiting federal sentencing or are already serving time for conspiring w/Russia" related to the Donald Trump Campaign or Presidency.

Did you write that lie?

Schoolyard Tactic #1: When you're wrong, insult the person who's right. Call them a liar even thought court records officially & eternally document the crimes.

There are THREE American men serving time, have been sentenced, or are awaiting sentencing for conspiracy between the Trump Campaign and Russia. I didn't include non-US citizens.

No one is "awaiting federal sentencing or are already serving time for conspiring w/Russia" related to the Donald Trump Campaign or Presidency.

Did you write that lie?

Schoolyard Tactic #1: When you're wrong, insult the person who's right. Call them a liar even thought court records officially & eternally document the crimes.

There are THREE American men serving time, have been sentenced, or are awaiting sentencing for conspiracy between the Trump Campaign and Russia. I didn't include non-US citizens.

I did not call you a liar. I asked you a question.

No one is "serving time, have been sentenced, or are awaiting sentencing for conspiracy between the Trump Campaign and Russia"

No one.

Asking someone if they are a liar is the same as calling them a liar.

You just can't help calling anyone with a different perspective a liar or stupid. We have all stooped to bad manners at times but you have been the worst offender on this board for years now, though you have backed off since Rowland asked us all to exercise common courtesy.

Asking someone if they are a liar is the same as calling them a liar.

You just can't help calling anyone with a different perspective a liar or stupid. We have all stooped to bad manners at times but you have been the worst offender on this board for years now, though you have backed off since Rowland asked us all to exercise common courtesy.

cyclone88 posted something that is factually incorrect.
You seem to have a different perspective than I do.
I prefer facts.

cyclone88 posted something that is factually incorrect.
You seem to have a different perspective than I do.
I prefer facts.

I posted correct facts based on court transcripts and records of the cases against the three who have been convicted re the Trump campaign and Russia. There is nothing incorrect about objective facts. There's no right or wrong. There is fact. Calling me a liar on this forum doesn't change the official court records.

[Edited on 1/20/2019 by cyclone88]

cyclone88 posted something that is factually incorrect.
You seem to have a different perspective than I do.
I prefer facts.

I posted correct facts based on court transcripts and records of the cases against the three who have been convicted re the Trump campaign and Russia. There is nothing incorrect about objective facts. There's no right or wrong. There is fact. Calling me a liar on this forum doesn't change the official court records.

[Edited on 1/20/2019 by cyclone88]

You did not post the names or links to the court cases.

No one is "serving time, have been sentenced, or are awaiting sentencing for conspiracy between the Trump Campaign and Russia"

No one.

cyclone88 posted something that is factually incorrect.

That may or may not be true. That doesn't give you the right to call him a liar.

Character is more important than politics.

cyclone88 posted something that is factually incorrect.

That may or may not be true. That doesn't give you the right to call him a liar.

Character is more important than politics.

I did not call him a liar.
I asked him a question.

Do keep trying to run away from the issue.

I did not call him a liar.
I asked him a question.

And he actually took the time to honor your question with a reply.
An honor you do not deserve, you expect people to answer your questions but never answer direct questions yourself.

For example, still waiting on your answer to this simple question:

"So, mule, yes or no, do you think the Jewish Holocaust was fake news?"

You did not post the names or links to the court cases.
No one is "serving time, have been sentenced, or are awaiting sentencing for conspiracy between the Trump Campaign and Russia"

No one.

You are free to interpret facts however suits you.

I, however, am an attorney with no obligation to post any links to any court databases to anyone. In some cases, I'm prohibited from doing so.

There has been ample news coverage of this topic for two years. Research could get you what you're asking me to provide for free.

I did not call him a liar.
I asked him a question.

And he actually took the time to honor your question with a reply.
An honor you do not deserve, you expect people to answer your questions but never answer direct questions yourself.

For example, still waiting on your answer to this simple question:

"So, mule, yes or no, do you think the Jewish Holocaust was fake news?"

Keep dancing.

Hahaha, just try asking him for background info, he just says things like "I don't do research for those too lazy or stupid to do the research themselves."

You did not post the names or links to the court cases.
No one is "serving time, have been sentenced, or are awaiting sentencing for conspiracy between the Trump Campaign and Russia"

No one.

You are free to interpret facts however suits you.

I, however, am an attorney with no obligation to post any links to any court databases to anyone. In some cases, I'm prohibited from doing so.

There has been ample news coverage of this topic for two years. Research could get you what you're asking me to provide for free.

You made a claim and are unable to support it.
Then you note "ample news coverage" which simply tells us your claim comes from fake news.

No one is "serving time, have been sentenced, or are awaiting sentencing for conspiracy between the Trump Campaign and Russia"

No one.

Keep dancing.

Keep trolling. Might seem irrelevant, however the question of whether or not someone is a Holocaust Denier is key, as it then becomes obvious that they are irrational.

I have asked you whether you were a Holocaust Denier many times over the last few years, and you have never answered.

Now THAT is dancing! Figured it is good to keep your tacit confirmation of your Holocaust Denial topped once in a while to remind us just who and what we are dealing with here.

Keep dancing.

Keep trolling. Might seem irrelevant, however the question of whether or not someone is a Holocaust Denier is key, as it then becomes obvious that they are irrational.

I have asked you whether you were a Holocaust Denier many times over the last few years, and you have never answered.

Now THAT is dancing! Figured it is good to keep your tacit confirmation of your Holocaust Denial topped once in a while to remind us just who and what we are dealing with here.

"the question of whether or not someone is a Holocaust Denier" has nothing to do with this tread.
You seem to have difficulty staying on topic.

You made a claim and are unable to support it.
Then you note "ample news coverage" which simply tells us your claim comes from fake news.

No one is "serving time, have been sentenced, or are awaiting sentencing for conspiracy between the Trump Campaign and Russia"

No one.

Keep repeating yourself.

I've been polite in responding to you even when you called me a liar and demanded that I risk disbarment to provide you with free information that you can get from any news source you deem satisfactory, even those written in other languages.

You don't like what I write, skip it. Move on. Life is short.

the question of whether or not someone is a Holocaust Denier" has nothing to do with this tread.
You seem to have difficulty staying on topic.

Meh, we are 50+ posts in, you know as well as I that formal adherence to thread topic tends to relax after a couple pages.

How about letting us in on your thoughts on why the Jewis Holocaust was fake news? Or at least put the question to rest with a simple, No, brerrabbit, I am certainly NOT a Holocaust Denier, it is an insult that you are even asking, what would ever give you the idea that I think the Jewish Holocaust was a communist hoax?

To me it would be fascinating, as I have never met anyone who is Holocaust Denier, am actually seriously interested in how someone ends up with this viewpoint.

the question of whether or not someone is a Holocaust Denier" has nothing to do with this tread.
You seem to have difficulty staying on topic.

Meh, we are 50+ posts in, you know as well as I that formal adherence to thread topic tends to relax after a couple pages.

How about letting us in on your thoughts on why the Jewis Holocaust was fake news? Or at least put the question to rest with a simple, No, brerrabbit, I am certainly NOT a Holocaust Denier, it is an insult that you are even asking, what would ever give you the idea that I think the Jewish Holocaust was a communist hoax?

To me it would be fascinating, as I have never met anyone who is Holocaust Denier, am actually seriously interested in how someone ends up with this viewpoint.

I answered your irrelevant question a long time ago.

cyclone88 made a claim but is now running away from supporting it.