So what's he probably thinking you'd say?
So what's he probably thinking you'd say?
He might be thinking that I'd say: See, Bernies' supporters are Nazis. But, I wouldn't since the Nazis and Socialists are two different mind sets. True socialists are communal, Nazis are totalitarian.
A socialist candidate doesn't bother me. FDR, Wilson, Johnson, and Jefferson could all be considered socialists.
What's the context of the photo? When, and where was it taken? Was she waving at someone, trying to get a "high five", or was she going to pat the guy on the head?
That picture doesn't speak a thousand words to me, it just seems to want questions asked about it.
If she was wearing a Bernie shirt, I'll bet you wouldn't say another word about it.
Actually, I would, but not what you are probably thinking I would say.
I don't think you'd say anything since you wouldn't give the same benefit of the doubt. I could be wrong.
Donald Trump on Orlando Shooting
The GOP candidate distorts the facts on the Orlando and San Bernardino shootings and Syrian refugees
http://www.factcheck.org/2016/06/donald-trump-on-orlando-shooting/
MoveOn.org is paying her $15 an hour...
If not she's just looking for somebody to hit. Violence and hate are all the Trump supporters care about.
Here's the story that BrerRabbit didn't want to share.
From the Chicago Tribune:
(snip)
The woman in the photo taken by a Tribune photographer outside the University of Illinois at Chicago Pavilion on March 11 is shown wearing a Trump shirt and was identified as Birgitt Peterson, 69, of Yorkville, as reported in a Tribune story the next day. Peterson said she emigrated from West Berlin and has been a US citizen since 1982.
(snip)
The woman in the photo and her husband defended her actions, saying the salute happened during an argument with protesters. Peterson, a Trump supporter, said protesters told her she was there to vote for Hitler and started giving her the Nazi gesture.
Peterson asked them if they knew what the salute meant.
Her husband, Donald, told the Tribune, "So Birgitt decided to teach them to do it." He insisted they were not Nazis."
There's more if you want to read it, but you'll have to find it at the Tribune website.
i tend to think she is proud of herself no matter whether she is really a trump supporter or a bernie fan or a hillary diehard. i think she did it for personal reasons not political. HEY, Look at ME. other than that.....who cares.
This was so long ago, when the MSM played the old man punching the black man over and over 24 seven. They barely reported the San Jose violence but there is no bias.
oh i don't know...i think it was well reported
oh i don't know...i think it was well reported
Of course it was. No idea what he is talking about.
By all means,just vote HILLARY.Just like Obama,she loves us one and all.And her only heart felt concern is that all our desires,goals,wants etc are to be met and satisfied.What a wonderful,honest,caring,loving and moral person.GOD bless her.
VOTE HILLARY!
I wish they'd erect a statue of her in every state.What a sweet and wonderful human being.
😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛
I still say Hillary would improve her chances by making Bernie her VP -- combined, they outpolled Donald during the primaries, why shouldn't they during the election
Originally I wanted the GOP to win the election, but that was before Donald became the nominee -- his chances will depend on how the convention goes & who he hires for VP
He's unpolished & talks the plain talk -- people identify with that -- never thought he'd get this far but who knows w/politics
By all means,just vote HILLARY.Just like Obama,she loves us one and all.And her only heart felt concern is that all our desires,goals,wants etc are to be met and satisfied.What a wonderful,honest,caring,loving and moral person.GOD bless her.
VOTE HILLARY!
I wish they'd erect a statue of her in every state.What a sweet and wonderful human being.😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛 😛
Luke, you and Oprah think alike !
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/oprah-endorses-hillary-clinton-president-903508
😉
Luke, neither Hillary nor Trump are nice, neither care about the people. So what is it really that makes you hate one and not the other?
Luke, neither Hillary nor Trump are nice, neither care about the people. So what is it really that makes you hate one and not the other?
Bingo! We have a winner. This is why non-partisan folks like me have no trouble saying they both suck. The dilemma is that if you are going to vote you need to decide to vote for one of the sucky mainstream candidates, or one of the 3rd party candidates who can not win. No matter how you look at it this election is going to suck. Arguments over which candidate sucks worse should not be taken to mean that the other candidate doesn't suck, even if to a lesser degee than the suckiest candidate. It's like saying that just because brussel sprouts suck worse than broccoli that broccoli is good. No, broccoli sucks, just not as bad as brussel sprouts. Green beans are good, but they are not on the menu.
Luke, neither Hillary nor Trump are nice, neither care about the people. So what is it really that makes you hate one and not the other?
Bingo! We have a winner. This is why non-partisan folks like me have no trouble saying they both suck. The dilemma is that if you are going to vote you need to decide to vote for one of the sucky mainstream candidates, or one of the 3rd party candidates who can not win. No matter how you look at it this election is going to suck. Arguments over which candidate sucks worse should not be taken to mean that the other candidate doesn't suck, even if to a lesser degee than the suckiest candidate. It's like saying that just because brussel sprouts suck worse than broccoli that broccoli is good. No, broccoli sucks, just not as bad as brussel sprouts. Green beans are good, but they are not on the menu.
Same as pretty much any other election. What's different this cycle is the presence of a true outsider, Mr. Trump. Somebody from the business world should get a chance. Someone who cut his teeth in the private economy.
[Edited on 6/16/2016 by alloak41]
Luke, neither Hillary nor Trump are nice, neither care about the people. So what is it really that makes you hate one and not the other?
Bingo! We have a winner. This is why non-partisan folks like me have no trouble saying they both suck. The dilemma is that if you are going to vote you need to decide to vote for one of the sucky mainstream candidates, or one of the 3rd party candidates who can not win. No matter how you look at it this election is going to suck. Arguments over which candidate sucks worse should not be taken to mean that the other candidate doesn't suck, even if to a lesser degee than the suckiest candidate. It's like saying that just because brussel sprouts suck worse than broccoli that broccoli is good. No, broccoli sucks, just not as bad as brussel sprouts. Green beans are good, but they are not on the menu.
Same as pretty much any other election. What's different this cycle is the presence of a true outsider, Mr. Trump. Somebody from the business world should get a chance. Someone who cut his teeth in the private economy.
[Edited on 6/16/2016 by alloak41]
Somebody from the business world? Maybe it might be time for that. But not Trump. He made his fortune by inheriting millions from his father and then proceeded to have several casinos, an airline and a food business go bankrupt. He started a "school" that also went under and is being sued by many individuals. He also has been taken taken to court many times for failing to pay people he contracted to work for him. You think this makes him presidential material?
I'm ok with an outsider. It just makes the right look kinda foolish when they've been screaming "community organizer" for 8 years. I oppose trump but not because of his political inexperience.
I'm ok with an outsider. It just makes the right look kinda foolish when they've been screaming "community organizer" for 8 years.
Not really. Obama had no executive or administrative experience, no business background,
and little or no experience in the private sector.
It's shown.
I'm ok with an outsider. It just makes the right look kinda foolish when they've been screaming "community organizer" for 8 years.
Not really. Obama had no executive or administrative experience, no business background,
and little or no experience in the private sector.It's shown.
Yeah, in spite of that he has been a pretty good president.
Trump has run his businesses into the ground. Yeah, let's let him run the entire country. 😛
Luke, neither Hillary nor Trump are nice, neither care about the people. So what is it really that makes you hate one and not the other?
Bingo! We have a winner. This is why non-partisan folks like me have no trouble saying they both suck. The dilemma is that if you are going to vote you need to decide to vote for one of the sucky mainstream candidates, or one of the 3rd party candidates who can not win. No matter how you look at it this election is going to suck. Arguments over which candidate sucks worse should not be taken to mean that the other candidate doesn't suck, even if to a lesser degee than the suckiest candidate. It's like saying that just because brussel sprouts suck worse than broccoli that broccoli is good. No, broccoli sucks, just not as bad as brussel sprouts. Green beans are good, but they are not on the menu.
Same as pretty much any other election. What's different this cycle is the presence of a true outsider, Mr. Trump. Somebody from the business world should get a chance. Someone who cut his teeth in the private economy.
Outsider? Bwwaaaaa aaa haahahaha aha ha hhhaaaa!
Cruz: Trump Posing as an Outsider Is Among 'Greatest Frauds' in Modern History
http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/04/30/ted-cruz-hannity-trump-pretending-be-outsider-one-greatest-frauds-modern-electoral
Paul: Trump is an insider pretending to be an outsider
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/gop-primaries/250663-paul-trump-is-an-insider-pretending-to-be-an-outsider
Political ‘outsider’ Donald Trump, the most politician-y politician ever
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/political-outsider-donald-trump-the-most-politiciany-politician-ever/2016/05/05/52f113c4-12fd-11e6-8967-7ac733c56f12_story.html
Luke, neither Hillary nor Trump are nice, neither care about the people. So what is it really that makes you hate one and not the other?
Bingo! We have a winner. This is why non-partisan folks like me have no trouble saying they both suck. The dilemma is that if you are going to vote you need to decide to vote for one of the sucky mainstream candidates, or one of the 3rd party candidates who can not win. No matter how you look at it this election is going to suck. Arguments over which candidate sucks worse should not be taken to mean that the other candidate doesn't suck, even if to a lesser degee than the suckiest candidate. It's like saying that just because brussel sprouts suck worse than broccoli that broccoli is good. No, broccoli sucks, just not as bad as brussel sprouts. Green beans are good, but they are not on the menu.
Same as pretty much any other election. What's different this cycle is the presence of a true outsider, Mr. Trump. Somebody from the business world should get a chance. Someone who cut his teeth in the private economy.
[Edited on 6/16/2016 by alloak41]
Not a shady businessman who is narcissistic, sociopathic, immature, impulsive, nasty, racist, and has zero self control. Both choices suck but there are clear differences and Trump has shown himself to be very dangerous with the incredibly stupid, un Constitutional, and un American things he says on a daily basis. Clinton might not be great but she is a far cry better than that crazy maniac Trump.
I will say it again and have been saying it for years on here. The Republicans just don't get it. They could have won in 2008 had they nominated McCain without forcing him to flip to the extreme right and had they let him campaign as himself which was the McCain who campaigned against W Bush in 2000. They could have won in 2008 had they allowed Romney to campaign as himself instead of making him flip on so many issues that he came off as complete phony. This time they didn't just nominate a flip flopping phony but they doubled down and added in a crazy out of control maniac and this will be a much larger loss than the last two.
This election was there for the taking and there was a single well respected Republican candidate who all polls showed would defeat Clinton but the Trump groupies decided that change for spite's sake was more important than winning back the White House. You Trumpeteers could have had President Kasich and all of those possible SCOTUS appointments. Now you will get at least four and probably eight years of Clinton and you have nobody to blame but yourselves for choosing the maniac Trump over the respected Kasich.
Remember that on November 8 when you are watching endless streams of Hilary giving her victory speech.
Remember that on November 8 when you are watching endless streams of Hilary giving her victory speech.
Again, I don't think it's that sure of a thing (didn't read entire post) -- a lot can happen during the course of an election
Hasn't Trump said he'd build a wall around the US to keep out aliens (could be wrong)
if elected, Donald would never be able to keep that campaign promise --
Donald won't win if his 1st or 2nd choices for VP, pass --
Yes it'd appear as tho the election is Hillary's to lose, esp. if she picks Bernie for VP
Again tho, who knows -- people are paying attention to Donald too 😮
Luke, neither Hillary nor Trump are nice, neither care about the people. So what is it really that makes you hate one and not the other?
One will take more money out of your pocket than the other. Its better to believe in equal opportunity for all.
I will say it again and have been saying it for years on here. The Republicans just don't get it. They could have won in 2008 had they nominated McCain without forcing him to flip to the extreme right and had they let him campaign as himself which was the McCain who campaigned against W Bush in 2000. They could have won in 2008 had they allowed Romney to campaign as himself instead of making him flip on so many issues that he came off as complete phony. This time they didn't just nominate a flip flopping phony but they doubled down and added in a crazy out of control maniac and this will be a much larger loss than the last two.
This election was there for the taking and there was a single well respected Republican candidate who all polls showed would defeat Clinton but the Trump groupies decided that change for spite's sake was more important than winning back the White House. You Trumpeteers could have had President Kasich and all of those possible SCOTUS appointments. Now you will get at least four and probably eight years of Clinton and you have nobody to blame but yourselves for choosing the maniac Trump over the respected Kasich.
I think there is a lot of truth in this. The Democrats nominated a candidate who is easily defeatable. The Republicans nominated one of the few candidates who is not likely to beat her. It's pretty stupid when you think of it.
Luke, neither Hillary nor Trump are nice, neither care about the people. So what is it really that makes you hate one and not the other?
One will take more money out of your pocket than the other. Its better to believe1 in equal opportunity for all than equal results
Trump's tax plan is the ultimate gamble in putting more money into the economy by cutting taxes which leads to growth. Pretty much all experts agree that it will add about $10 trillion to the deficit, where they split is on the growth impact of such a move.
I will say it again and have been saying it for years on here. The Republicans just don't get it. They could have won in 2008 had they nominated McCain without forcing him to flip to the extreme right and had they let him campaign as himself which was the McCain who campaigned against W Bush in 2000. [/quo
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely no way ANY Republican wins that election. Not with the unpopularity of Bush, not to mention an economic "collapse" just before the election.
[Edited on 6/18/2016 by alloak41]
Trump's tax plan is the ultimate gamble in putting more money into the economy by cutting taxes which leads to growth. Pretty much all experts agree that it will add about $10 trillion to the deficit, where they split is on the growth impact of such a move.
It's never worked before, but I'm sure it will this time.
hillary wins...changing my numbers from 58-42 though
prob be 54-31-14.....hillary....donald....johnson