Looks like Crooked Hillary did want to rub out Assange.
You have a lot of balls calling someone crooked while you support Trump. But you already know that.
3 am NYTime document drop from Wikileaks just hours away.
Hahahah!!!! Assange sure trolled the anti-Hillary hopefulls. It was fun reading all the comments over at infowars. Nothing but a 2-hour book plug. So are you going to buy it Goober?
Hook. Line. Sinker.
Again.
What a simpleton. At least goober has company.
Classic.
Disappointed in no smoking gun emails but still not detered that the evidence will come out one day. Could be someone got to him.
Goober, you are like a blindfolded kid swinging at a piñata. Except that there is no piñata and you are swinging at the breeze. Someday you may figure that out.
Disappointed in no smoking gun emails but still not detered that the evidence will come out one day. Could be someone got to him.
It is deterred.
You are such a phony.
How ironic is it that the same people who think Hillary should be in jail for mishandling classified information are upset with Assange for not leaking classified information today.
It's going to be released from Berlin, I already told you people that in another thread.
It's going to be released from Berlin, I already told you people that in another thread.
It wa going to be released last night. We alr already told you that.
Update:
From Berlin 4 hours ago.
BERLIN (Reuters) - WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said on Tuesday the group would publish about one million documents related to the U.S. election and three governments in coming weeks, but denied the release was aimed at damaging Hillary Clinton. Assange, speaking via a video link, said the documents would be released before the end of the year, starting with an initial batch in the coming week.
"The material that WikiLeaks is going to publish before the end of the year is of … a very significant moment in different directions, affecting three powerful organizations in three different states as well as … the U.S election process,” He said the material would focus on war, weapons, oil, mass surveillance, the technology giant Google and the U.S. election, but declined to give any details.
“There has been a misquoting of me and Wikileaks publications … (suggesting) we intend to harm Hillary Clinton or I intend to harm Hillary Clinton or that I don’t like Hillary Clinton. All those are false,” he said.
REMARKS: He said he would release the material today, he should have done that. If he has something that would significantly impact the elections, why is he waiting?
Update:
From Berlin 4 hours ago.
BERLIN (Reuters) - WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said on Tuesday the group would publish about one million documents related to the U.S. election and three governments in coming weeks, but denied the release was aimed at damaging Hillary Clinton. Assange, speaking via a video link, said the documents would be released before the end of the year, starting with an initial batch in the coming week.
"The material that WikiLeaks is going to publish before the end of the year is of … a very significant moment in different directions, affecting three powerful organizations in three different states as well as … the U.S election process,” He said the material would focus on war, weapons, oil, mass surveillance, the technology giant Google and the U.S. election, but declined to give any details.
“There has been a misquoting of me and Wikileaks publications … (suggesting) we intend to harm Hillary Clinton or I intend to harm Hillary Clinton or that I don’t like Hillary Clinton. All those are false,” he said.
REMARKS: He said he would release the material today, he should have done that. If he has something that would significantly impact the elections, why is he waiting?
Hook. Line. Sinker.
Again.
And again. And again. And so on...
Disappointed in no smoking gun emails but still not detered that the evidence will come out one day. Could be someone got to him.
Assange himself thinks the reaction to the emails is a witch hunt, so why are you soiling yourself over this lame Assange hype?
from cnet
"Assange denied reports that he intended to harm the campaign of Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, although he did describe the reaction to leaks of Democratic emails as "neo-McCarthy-esque hysteria."
I have watched his interviews with Megan Kelly and Hannity 2-3 weeks ago. He had plenty of time to set the record straight. Instead, he now seems like he was baiting everyone. Problem is, this type of act doesnt work well for him and he lost alot of credibility. He has no media outlets so he can easily be ignored.
I have watched his interviews with Megan Kelly and Hannity 2-3 weeks ago. He had plenty of time to set the record straight. Instead, he now seems like he was baiting everyone. Problem is, this type of act doesnt work well for him and he lost alot of credibility. He has no media outlets so he can easily be ignored.
That explains why you post most of what you post. Fox News acts like a group of sharks in the water waiting for something, anything, that they can use against the Democrats. And you are there with them. You and Fox have been played.
I have watched his interviews with Megan Kelly and Hannity 2-3 weeks ago.
You should get your news from more than one source if you really want to be informed. Fox, CNN, MSNBC, NYT, WSJ, USA Today, etc. each have their biases but if you take in as much as you can and do your own analysis you'll be much better prepared for election day, not to mention much better prepared to discuss issues in internet forums. Of course if you're just looking for a media outlet that validates your opinions stick with the one that does that, but don't be surprised if no one takes you seriously.
What's more embarrassing? Goober's foolish thread fail acting like a kid on Christmas Eve in the original post, or his own admission that he's disappointed in the fact that a US Presidential candidate is NOT guilty of attempted murder. What a guy.
Now we know why Assange walked back his hype. Nothing he's sitting on can outrun the daily Trump train.
"We've...got some...emails over...here...anyone, anyone?"
Can't compete with "Grab them by the p---y."
