The Republicans are supposed to care about the Constitution

Haha!...So are the Democrats. Like the 2nd amendment, "Hate speech" LOL & The Electoral College. Carved in stone they are serviceable everyday, not meant to be applicable only when it suits your argument.

I repeat, hypocrites all.

Bullsh!t. Tell me how Democrats are "anti 2nd amendment"?. The electorial college was put in place to help slave states hold on to power, and in the last 20 years, helped 2 Republican presidents win elections when they lost the popular vote. One of them had help from a Russian disinformation campaign on social media.

In your zeal, seems you've forgotten to defend the Dems obsession with "Hate speech"!

Its not a good way to make friends, BIG VEE. unless you want neo- nazi's and klansman as your friends.

Puzzling how someone is so concerned for the right to spew hatred...

Puzzling how someone is so concerned for the right to spew hatred...

Yep, one of the Planets great mysteries.... "How can ANYONE disagree with the Democratic point of view concerning President Trump"?!!

unless you want neo- nazi's and klansman as your friends.

The next, will be the first.

Puzzling how someone is so concerned for the right to spew hatred...

Yep, one of the Planets great mysteries.... "How can ANYONE disagree with the Democratic point of view concerning President Trump"?!!

Well, actually, no. He’s inferring you support hateful speech. It’s an easy conclusion to draw.

Puzzling how someone is so concerned for the right to spew hatred...

Yep, one of the Planets great mysteries.... "How can ANYONE disagree with the Democratic point of view concerning President Trump"?!!

Well, actually, no. He’s inferring you support hateful speech. It’s an easy conclusion to draw.

My bad... Dammit I keep forgetting that the Democrats have an entirely different take on the first Amendment!...You can say whatever you want, as long as it's OK with them.

Puzzling how someone is so concerned for the right to spew hatred...

Yep, one of the Planets great mysteries.... "How can ANYONE disagree with the Democratic point of view concerning President Trump"?!!

Well, actually, no. He’s inferring you support hateful speech. It’s an easy conclusion to draw.

My bad... Dammit I keep forgetting that the Democrats have an entirely different take on the first Amendment!...You can say whatever you want, as long as it's OK with them.

Whoa there, Whiny McDramaqueen. People daring to disagree with you aren’t violating your First Amendment rights. Needling a tender ego, maybe, but that’s about it.

Puzzling how someone is so concerned for the right to spew hatred...

Yep, one of the Planets great mysteries.... "How can ANYONE disagree with the Democratic point of view concerning President Trump"?!!

Well, actually, no. He’s inferring you support hateful speech. It’s an easy conclusion to draw.

My bad... Dammit I keep forgetting that the Democrats have an entirely different take on the first Amendment!...You can say whatever you want, as long as it's OK with them.

Whoa there, Whiny McDramaqueen. People daring to disagree with you aren’t violating your First Amendment rights. Needling a tender ego, maybe, but that’s about it.

Interesting take in that I am Not the one claiming my 1st Amendment rights are being "violated"..lol. That burden falls on the snowflakes who continuously advocate "Hate speech" as somehow being "mean" and responsible for hurting peoples feelings. Funny in that no one here can legally define said infraction, just the constant allusion to it as being "hateful", does that have a meaning that is supposed intimidate someone? And for the record, disagree with me all you want, you will never see me hiding behind the skirt y'all refer to as "Hate speech". I will disagree as well, but try to stay out of the gutter in that I believe making these things personal is pretty chicken****.

Puzzling how someone is so concerned for the right to spew hatred...

Yep, one of the Planets great mysteries.... "How can ANYONE disagree with the Democratic point of view concerning President Trump"?!!

Well, actually, no. He’s inferring you support hateful speech. It’s an easy conclusion to draw.

My bad... Dammit I keep forgetting that the Democrats have an entirely different take on the first Amendment!...You can say whatever you want, as long as it's OK with them.

Whoa there, Whiny McDramaqueen. People daring to disagree with you aren’t violating your First Amendment rights. Needling a tender ego, maybe, but that’s about it.

Interesting take in that I am Not the one claiming my 1st Amendment rights are being "violated"..lol. That burden falls on the snowflakes who continuously advocate "Hate speech" as somehow being "mean" and responsible for hurting peoples feelings. Funny in that no one here can legally define said infraction, just the constant allusion to it as being "hateful", does that have a meaning that is supposed intimidate someone? And for the record, disagree with me all you want, you will never see me hiding behind the skirt y'all refer to as "Hate speech". I will disagree as well, but try to stay out of the gutter in that I believe making these things personal is pretty chicken*.

Hahah big vajayjay being big vajayjay.

You know the term snowflakes was actually spawned by someone referring to white people who are so chicken* and insecure that anytime some say they are being racially discriminated against, said white person (see-snowflakes) throw a hissy fit about how racism doesn’t exist, these people should pull themselves up by their bootstraps etc etc.

So basically in a nutshell, The term snowflake originally referred to people like you, Bigman, before the meaning was misconstrued, taken and run with, kinda like fake news.

Oh and by the way you do like to hide behind these blanket term “skirts”, probably more so than anyone here and of course you are always the first to cry hypocrisy.

Please see my last post and look up the origin of the term snowflake, you may learn a lot about yourself...or knowing your snowflake like tendencies you’ll find a reason that everyone but you is a racist hypocrite or claim that the term snowflake referring to anti-abolitionists is “fake news”....Snowflake

[Edited on 12/14/2019 by lukester420]

snowflakes who continuously advocate "Hate speech" as somehow being "mean" and responsible for hurting peoples feelings. Funny in that no one here can legally define said infraction

Someone here CAN provide the legal definition of hate speech - speech intended to incite a clear & present danger of imminent lawless action. Only a handful of cases have been heard by SCOTUS & their opinion is ALWAYS narrowly drawn so that no matter how vicious or offensive the words (or cross burnings or Nazi marches or funeral disruptions) are, the constitutional guarantee of free speech is sacred. The composition of the court doesn't affect how unwavering it is in its protection of free speech.

I always thought the vitriol was to cover up the crippling insecurity, fear and ignorance

Quite true that last sentence in cyclone88’s post, & it’s that very thing - protection of free speech - that inevitably leads to violence at the types of rallies mentioned - it’s events like that where the right to free speech should come with plenty of red flags -
The film Skokie based on what happened there, does a superb evenhanded job of portraying this schism
skinhead/KKK scum has no place in any civilized society, much less talking their violent psychopathic trash in public places

[Edited on 12/14/2019 by Stephen]

The only thing that's chicken**** is directing all your ire at an entire party's values

The pot calling the kettle black. My my, such "liberal" thinking going on here.

Tell me Skydog32103 (just so we don't get confused about the other skydog posters here) what have YOU been doing for the past couple of years.?

Have you been praising the Republicans for their progress in their duties? Have you said one good thing about the
Libertarians? Have you ever posted about how much you dislike a Democrat?

If you did, please remind me with a re-post of it.

The only thing that's chicken**** is directing all your ire at an entire party's values, and the weaker smaller people in our government, like AOC.

Thanks for finally admitting that! Although I will continue to refer to her simply as "Box of rocks", but, it is a step in the right direction.

The Republicans are supposed to care about the Constitution

Haha!...So are the Democrats. Like the 2nd amendment, "Hate speech" LOL & The Electoral College. Carved in stone they are serviceable everyday, not meant to be applicable only when it suits your argument.

I repeat, hypocrites all.

Bullsh!t. Tell me how Democrats are "anti 2nd amendment"?. The electorial college was put in place to help slave states hold on to power, and in the last 20 years, helped 2 Republican presidents win elections when they lost the popular vote. One of them had help from a Russian disinformation campaign on social media.

In your zeal, seems you've forgotten to defend the Dems obsession with "Hate speech"!

Its not a good way to make friends, BIG VEE. unless you want neo- nazi's and klansman as your friends.

Why would he want you as a friend?

The only thing that's chicken**** is directing all your ire at an entire party's values

It is honestly how I feel. In reality NO different than the constant views and posts here about Conservatives and President Trump.

If you can hand it out, you better be able to take it.

Or is that "Hate speech"?

 

If you can hand it out, you better be able to take it. Or is that "Hate speech"?

Just STFU about hate speech. You said no one here could provide the legal definition. I did. My knowledge isn't just based on law school and the practice of law but clerking for one of the pre-eminent scholars of the First Amendment. I was legit answering your question, but your continued deliberate mis-use of the term indicates you're just a troll or a lame comedian.

Hate speech is not boyz slinging taunts at each other on a website. What you perpetuate is playground speech.

The only thing that's chicken**** is directing all your ire at an entire party's values

It is honestly how I feel. In reality NO different than the constant views and posts here about Conservatives and President Trump.

If you can hand it out, you better be able to take it.

Or is that "Hate speech"?

You certainly can't take anyone challenging you....Snowflake

 

If you can hand it out, you better be able to take it. Or is that "Hate speech"?

Just STFU about hate speech. You said no one here could provide the legal definition. I did. My knowledge isn't just based on law school and the practice of law but clerking for one of the pre-eminent scholars of the First Amendment. I was legit answering your question, but your continued deliberate mis-use of the term indicates you're just a troll or a lame comedian.

Hate speech is not boyz slinging taunts at each other on a website. What you perpetuate is playground speech.

Huh...He's gonna claim you're violating his 1A when asked him very eloquently to STFU....Thank you for the legal definition...BIGV is probably perfecting his B3 solo's right now and finding new lame justifications for wanting to scream racial slurs without consequences

Just STFU about hate speech.

Is this hate speech? lol

Huh...He's gonna claim you're violating his 1A when asked him very eloquently to STFU..

And w/o missing a beat he did AND thought he was funny.

At least he amuses himself. Didn't Freud say the definition of insanity was doing the same thing over & over again & expecting a different result? Wonder if he's ever gotten any laughs.

Huh...He's gonna claim you're violating his 1A when asked him very eloquently to STFU..

And w/o missing a beat he did AND thought he was funny.

At least he amuses himself. Didn't Freud say the definition of insanity was doing the same thing over & over again & expecting a different result? Wonder if he's ever gotten any laughs.

Oh he gets laughs...green shirt guy moment type of laughs

Huh...He's gonna claim you're violating his 1A when asked him very eloquently to STFU..

And w/o missing a beat he did AND thought he was funny.

At least he amuses himself. Didn't Freud say the definition of insanity was doing the same thing over & over again & expecting a different result? Wonder if he's ever gotten any laughs.

Oh he gets laughs...green shirt guy moment type of laughs

I laugh at him pretty regularly, the BIG tough guy facade covering for massive insecurity and irrational unfounded fear of his rights being violated, the absolute obliviousness that he is in fact the snowflake, it actually is pretty damn funny

The pot calling the kettle black. My my, such "liberal" thinking going on here.

Tell me Skydog32103 (just so we don't get confused about the other skydog posters here) what have YOU been doing for the past couple of years.?

Rightfully criticizing Trump’s choice to be an intentionally hostile and divisive jerk, and the segment of Trump supporters who used their vote as a weapon. You and BIGV can continue to go after a set of values, as you just did by your characterization of liberals.

When you insult someone for “hypocrisy” or “lying”, then you really have nothing at all since that describes all of us. There’s not one soul on this planet that hasn’t lied or isn’t a hypocrite in some way, so when you ha e criticism unique only to liberals, I might listen.

So it's ok for you to criticize and denigrate a large number of people, but for others it's wrong.
How "liberal" of your thought processes.

Where did I say all liberals, or even say anything about any liberals? Comprehensive reading is still not your forte is it?

Since you missed it, "My my, such "liberal" thinking going on here." Try again on what that phrase means since you thoroughly missed the point.

Also, you still didn't post a response on where I asked you about posts you might have made criticizing a Democrat, or praising a Republican. Have you ever done so?

Hahah big vajayjay being big vajayjay.

You know the term snowflakes was actually spawned by someone referring to white people who are so chicken**** and insecure that anytime some say they are being racially discriminated against, said white person (see-snowflakes) throw a hissy fit about how racism doesn’t exist, these people should pull themselves up by their bootstraps etc etc.

So basically in a nutshell, The term snowflake originally referred to people like you, Bigman, before the meaning was misconstrued, taken and run with, kinda like fake news.

Sorry, no. The original use of the word is to describe individual pieces of frozen crystals that fall from the sky to make up snow. Thought everybody knew that.
But, here are some various definitions to read:
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Snowflake

While these are not "Websters'" type definitions, it does give a variation of how the word has been used. The list is more than 5 pages long.

Hahah big vajayjay being big vajayjay.

You know the term snowflakes was actually spawned by someone referring to white people who are so chicken**** and insecure that anytime some say they are being racially discriminated against, said white person (see-snowflakes) throw a hissy fit about how racism doesn’t exist, these people should pull themselves up by their bootstraps etc etc.

So basically in a nutshell, The term snowflake originally referred to people like you, Bigman, before the meaning was misconstrued, taken and run with, kinda like fake news.

Sorry, no. The original use of the word is to describe individual pieces of frozen crystals that fall from the sky to make up snow. Thought everybody knew that.
But, here are some various definitions to read:
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Snowflake

While these are not "Websters'" type definitions, it does give a variation of how the word has been used. The list is more than 5 pages long.

Sorry, I didn’t think someone with such poor reading comprehension skills would take that so literally. Allow me to clarify, snowflakes as a politicized term.
Nice of you to stick up for your other snowflake buddy BIG vajayjay though.urban dictionary is probably unaware of the use of the term snowflake to refer to anti-abolitionists and other generally ignorant white folks. But hey good job using the tried and true right wing smug deflection to ignore the actual topic of the post....Snowflake

So it's ok for you to criticize and denigrate a large number of people, but for others it's wrong.

Yes, it’s ok to criticize a segment of people who admit to using their vote as a weapon (behavior and choices). No, it’s not ok to hate liberals and Democratic values. The latter is the definition of a bigot.

In other words, think like you, or else---
Correct.

That's the true meaning of a despot to me.

Hahah big vajayjay being big vajayjay.

You know the term snowflakes was actually spawned by someone referring to white people who are so chicken**** and insecure that anytime some say they are being racially discriminated against, said white person (see-snowflakes) throw a hissy fit about how racism doesn’t exist, these people should pull themselves up by their bootstraps etc etc.

So basically in a nutshell, The term snowflake originally referred to people like you, Bigman, before the meaning was misconstrued, taken and run with, kinda like fake news.

Sorry, no. The original use of the word is to describe individual pieces of frozen crystals that fall from the sky to make up snow. Thought everybody knew that.
But, here are some various definitions to read:
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Snowflake

While these are not "Websters'" type definitions, it does give a variation of how the word has been used. The list is more than 5 pages long.

Sorry, I didn’t think someone with such poor reading comprehension skills would take that so literally. Allow me to clarify, snowflakes as a politicized term.
Nice of you to stick up for your other snowflake buddy BIG vajayjay though.urban dictionary is probably unaware of the use of the term snowflake to refer to anti-abolitionists and other generally ignorant white folks. But hey good job using the tried and true right wing smug deflection to ignore the actual topic of the post....Snowflake

Now you're bad mouthing white people. Just how racist are you?

Hahah big vajayjay being big vajayjay.

You know the term snowflakes was actually spawned by someone referring to white people who are so chicken**** and insecure that anytime some say they are being racially discriminated against, said white person (see-snowflakes) throw a hissy fit about how racism doesn’t exist, these people should pull themselves up by their bootstraps etc etc.

So basically in a nutshell, The term snowflake originally referred to people like you, Bigman, before the meaning was misconstrued, taken and run with, kinda like fake news.

Sorry, no. The original use of the word is to describe individual pieces of frozen crystals that fall from the sky to make up snow. Thought everybody knew that.
But, here are some various definitions to read:
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Snowflake

While these are not "Websters'" type definitions, it does give a variation of how the word has been used. The list is more than 5 pages long.

Sorry, I didn’t think someone with such poor reading comprehension skills would take that so literally. Allow me to clarify, snowflakes as a politicized term.
Nice of you to stick up for your other snowflake buddy BIG vajayjay though.urban dictionary is probably unaware of the use of the term snowflake to refer to anti-abolitionists and other generally ignorant white folks. But hey good job using the tried and true right wing smug deflection to ignore the actual topic of the post....Snowflake

Now you're bad mouthing white people. Just how racist are you?

Yep just keep deflecting funny man
And the concept of “racism” against white people is laughable, the term is prejudiced. And I am very prejudiced against ignorant white people who are a disgrace to their entire race. Ie. confederate flag wavers, neo-nazis, ya know all the poor white trash who have to blame all their shortcomings on everyone else

[Edited on 12/14/2019 by lukester420]

[Edited on 12/14/2019 by lukester420]

Hahah big vajayjay being big vajayjay.

You know the term snowflakes was actually spawned by someone referring to white people who are so chicken**** and insecure that anytime some say they are being racially discriminated against, said white person (see-snowflakes) throw a hissy fit about how racism doesn’t exist, these people should pull themselves up by their bootstraps etc etc.

So basically in a nutshell, The term snowflake originally referred to people like you, Bigman, before the meaning was misconstrued, taken and run with, kinda like fake news.

Sorry, no. The original use of the word is to describe individual pieces of frozen crystals that fall from the sky to make up snow. Thought everybody knew that.
But, here are some various definitions to read:
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Snowflake

While these are not "Websters'" type definitions, it does give a variation of how the word has been used. The list is more than 5 pages long.

Sorry, I didn’t think someone with such poor reading comprehension skills would take that so literally. Allow me to clarify, snowflakes as a politicized term.
Nice of you to stick up for your other snowflake buddy BIG vajayjay though.urban dictionary is probably unaware of the use of the term snowflake to refer to anti-abolitionists and other generally ignorant white folks. But hey good job using the tried and true right wing smug deflection to ignore the actual topic of the post....Snowflake

Now you're bad mouthing white people. Just how racist are you?

Yep just keep deflecting funny man
And the concept of “racism” against white people is laughable, the term is prejudiced. And I am very prejudiced against ignorant white people who are a disgrace to their entire race. Ie. confederate flag wavers, neo-nazis, ya know all the poor white trash who have to blame all their shortcomings on everyone else

[Edited on 12/14/2019 by lukester420]

[Edited on 12/14/2019 by lukester420]

What's really funny is how you and Skydog32103 go all kneejerk reactive to posts that YOU don't realize are poking fun at you, or ask you to post a response to a question.
Do we need to make the use of smiley faces mandatory, or can the comprehension of grammar usage be taught better in the public schools.
Also, what's up with your lapse of posting in 2016, and then spending most of your time in the Whipping Post since? You used to only post in Anything Goes.