"If he has to be fumigated out"

Hey, you know what the Washington Post is calling controversy?
And BTW - Trump for four years refers to the New York Times as the failing NYT. However its stock is at a 5 year high. Another example of a Trump accuracy?
The entire GOP and far right live in propaganda world and want to make people believe just the most absurd BS ever....Most is just laughable and before there was FOX people like this would stand on street corners handing out fliers the rest of us would throw away and laugh at the madness...that is what has changed the madness has a bigger platform and seeks out the chicken little's and Alice in wonderlands just ready to scream that the sky is falling and we all should run down the rabbit hole and seek out the door mouse....
Propaganda is Big V's world and world view...trying to reason with people like that is expecting your cat to bark...a huge waste of time and really not entertaining at all because he shows himself then pretends no one see's who he really is....it's always just a difference of opinion...
[Edited on 7/22/2020 by goldtop]

trying to reason with people like that is expecting your cat to bark.
"Reason"...I love that, another veiled attempt at one of the left's biggest phrases..
"You just don't understand"...
Look at all the energy here spent on trying to discredit an opinion. The left has not learned a thing...
As a registered Libertarian, what are your thoughts of any elected official refusing to accept the results of an election?
It's wrong, flat out. Ask Hillary, she lost and how did she respond?..Was she graceful in defeat? That is the only recent example I can recall.
We won't know how either Candidate will behave until November. Until then, I guess we wait
.

Fumi-Gate
Man if you made that up, you just coined what could easily be the top meme of 2020. I want a bumpersticker of that. With a graphic of a big orange cockroach superimposed on the White House.
I don't think I could get them printed fast enough to keep up with the 2020 cable news cycle.

No, what it means is that actions, thoughts and beliefs held and enacted on by the left/liberal mindset are far more bothersome and threatening to me and MILLIONS like me than you can imagine
Pretty sure you'll all be OK.
Believe it or scorn it. I do not care any less about this than you care about people with the audacity to not see it your way.
Oh, you care. If you didn't, why post? Why engage? Besides, that whole "you just can't handle anyone disagreeing with you" thing is just as silly and juvenile as the first time you typed it.
Millions of people have different opinions than me, fine by me.
You're the only guy I know that constantly picks a fight and then acts totally shocked when someone swings back.
This is commonly referred to as polarization and has been advanced to the point where simple discussion is next to impossible without it sinking to name calling and labeling, all because your "Mainstream" views have been ...questioned & challenged.
Scold others for labeling, call everyone who dares respond to you "the Left." Priceless.
I repeat, the left has learned nothing from 2016.
Isn't that a good thing in your eyes, then? Another Trump victory? What are you complaining about? Surely you have something better to do than hang out with all the leftists around here?

You're the only guy I know that constantly picks a fight and then acts totally shocked when someone swings back.
Well, "Picking a fight" is to single out an Individual and focus on them. I state an opinion, am followed around by those who can't tolerate a dissenting take and believe name calling is the solution.

You're the only guy I know that constantly picks a fight and then acts totally shocked when someone swings back.
Well, "Picking a fight" is to single out an Individual and focus on them. I state an opinion, am followed around by those who can't tolerate a dissenting take and believe name calling is the solution.
This "can't tolerate a dissenting take" is your interpretation, and yours alone. I'll never be able to figure out where you are coming from on that one.
No one's innocent, you've called me a name or two over the years.

As a registered Libertarian, what are your thoughts of any elected official refusing to accept the results of an election?
It's wrong, flat out. Ask Hillary, she lost and how did she respond?..Was she graceful in defeat? That is the only recent example I can recall.
We won't know how either Candidate will behave until November. Until then, I guess we wait
.
Yes, she was graceful in defeat. She promptly conceded the day after the election, as soon as the election was called. She never whined about a rigged election. We hardly heard from her for months after the election. Am I wrong? You seem to be implying something different.

I state an opinion, am followed around by those who can't tolerate a dissenting take and believe name calling is the solution.
Most folks here had a respectable back-and-forth in this thread you started, respectfully disagreeing with you. You're the one dismissing a number of your fellow HTNers as if they are part of some hive mind just because they disagree with you and thoughtfully stated why. I haven't read any name calling, you are not being persecuted.
So if your opinion is "Pelosi if awful" because her word choice could be taken literally, you've made your point and everyone was able to handle that. You stated you agree that a President should accept election results, so you also agree with her. Great. Nothing to see here.

There is another attempt at a coup going on, one week ago she said "he's leaving whether he knows it or not". [Nancy Pelosi].
Source: D.H.
They do not want to wait till after the election, what if he wins again? Nope. How will they do it? The banks need another bailout like 2008. If you do not know look into the Bank of International Settlements. They are the Central bank all the world banks go to. They advise when Quantitative Easing should happen etc.
What will happen? You will accept a digital currency, no more coins, prices will be upped to the next dollar amount so if something is $2.59, they will up the price to an even $3.00. Next $1 and $5 Bill's will be gone. $10 will be the lowest denomination. They will say it is hyperinflation as the reason why.
There is more but I'll stop here.
Sources: D.H., P.B.
- 75 Forums
- 15 K Topics
- 192.2 K Posts
- 13 Online
- 24.8 K Members