HAHAHAHA! You are really a piece of work.
Because Ms. Rodriguez recanted her claim but she was on the list of people the Dems demanded interviewed.
#1. Her name is Ramirez.
#2. She did not recant her story. She has not released any info since the FBI interview. Whatever the FBI learned is unknown to the public.In her interview with "The New Yorker" she stated that she could not say Kavanaugh was really there.
[Edited on 10/7/2018 by BrerRabbit]
Nice try, adding this bit to my quoted text so it looks like I wrote it:
"In her interview with "The New Yorker" she stated that she could not say Kavanaugh was really there." Those are your words not mine.
Let's try this again, with names added to prevent your little editorial shenanigans:
Rabbit:
HAHAHAHA! You are really a piece of work.
mule:
Because Ms. Rodriguez recanted her claim but she was on the list of people the Dems demanded interviewed.
rabbit, text continued from HAHAHAHA:
#1. Her name is Ramirez.
#2. She did not recant her story. She has not released any info since the FBI interview. Whatever the FBI learned is unknown to the public.
Don't worry, I get it -Rodriguez, Ramirez, all those Taco Truck names sound the same.
Nice try, adding this bit to my quoted text so it looks like I wrote it:
"In her interview with "The New Yorker" she stated that she could not say Kavanaugh was really there." Those are your words not mine.Let's try this again, with names added to prevent your little editorial shenanigans:
Rabbit:
HAHAHAHA! You are really a piece of work.
mule:
Because Ms. Rodriguez recanted her claim but she was on the list of people the Dems demanded interviewed.
rabbit, text continued from HAHAHAHA:
#1. Her name is Ramirez.
#2. She did not recant her story. She has not released any info since the FBI interview. Whatever the FBI learned is unknown to the public.
In her interview with "The New Yorker" she stated that she could not say Kavanaugh was really there.
That interview occurred before the FBI interview.
She recanted.
Just like the 3rd accuser Julie Swetnick, represented by a porn lawyer, retracted her claim.
Kavanaugh wasn't toast. 🙁
32 comments, wow
We really need a new conspiracy, manufactured crisis or something say Area51-ish.
In her interview with "The New Yorker" she stated that she could not say Kavanaugh was really there.
That interview occurred before the FBI interview.
She recanted.
Nope. Ramirez did not "recant", as you say. Quite the opposite - at first she was concerned about poor memory due to drinking, but gained confidence in her story and supported the FBI investigation.
Here is the New Yorker follow up:
. . .For Ramirez, the sudden attention has been unwelcome, and prompted difficult choices. She was at first hesitant to speak publicly, partly because her memories contained gaps because she had been drinking at the time of the alleged incident. In her initial conversations with The New Yorker, she was reluctant to characterize Kavanaugh’s role in the alleged incident with certainty. After six days of carefully assessing her memories and consulting with her attorney, Ramirez said that she felt confident enough of her recollections to say that she remembers Kavanaugh had exposed himself at a drunken dormitory party, thrust his penis in her face, and caused her to touch it without her consent as she pushed him away. Ramirez is now calling for the F.B.I. to investigate Kavanaugh’s role in the incident. “I would think an F.B.I. investigation would be warranted,” she said.
[Edited on 10/8/2018 by BrerRabbit]
Upside is at least you learned today, here on Whipping Post, that the woman's name is Ramirez, not Rodriguez. Should save you further embarrassment in future discussions of this topic.
Schooling is good. Baby steps, baby steps.
Why are the lefties so afraid of a now Supreme Court Justice with a proven track record of ruling based on the law?
Because, when presented with an opportunity to prove he is fit, he cried like a little baby for 30 minutes straight. Maybe there’s a tougher, more stable candidate?
According to both A/P and CBS News:
“Ramirez has admitted that she doesn't remember all the details from the night in question and reportedly said she can't be absolutely sure it was Kavanaugh who exposed himself to her.”
Ramirez was interviewed by The FBI and that interview was included in the FBI’s report.
That report was read by all the Dems on the Senate Judiciary Committee and not one of them said her accusation was collaborated.
There never has been any collaboration or proof of the accusations made against Brett Kavanaugh.
Ford said 4 other people were witness. All four have stated they did not.
Ramirez “can’t be sure it was Kavanaugh”. Not one other person says it happened.
Swetnick has been proven a liar and withdrew her accusation.
The Dems tried to use the false accusations to destroy Brett Kavanaugh in a purely political attack.
The Dems failed, again.
Ramirez was interviewed by The FBI ...
Hey, alright! Look at that, you started calling her Ramirez instead of Rodriguez. That is the first time I have ever seen you admit you were mistaken.
Good job. I'm sure it wasn't easy to swallow your pride and own your error.
Baby steps.
According to both A/P and CBS News:
“Ramirez has admitted that she doesn't remember all the details from the night in question and reportedly said she can't be absolutely sure it was Kavanaugh who exposed himself to her.”
Ramirez was interviewed by The FBI and that interview was included in the FBI’s report.
That report was read by all the Dems on the Senate Judiciary Committee and not one of them said her accusation was collaborated.
There never has been any collaboration or proof of the accusations made against Brett Kavanaugh.
Ford said 4 other people were witness. All four have stated they did not.Ramirez “can’t be sure it was Kavanaugh”. Not one other person says it happened.
Swetnick has been proven a liar and withdrew her accusation.
The Dems tried to use the false accusations to destroy Brett Kavanaugh in a purely political attack.
The Dems failed, again.
I figured it was time you slithered in to get the week started. Someone asked me did I watch Fox News to which I replied that I didn’t have to as my good buddy Muleman1994 (jeez, my iPad remembers your screen name) from the ABB board let’s me know every dam word they say. In case you missed it, we know your guy got on the court, by the lowest vote count in history, but he’s on. Let’s hope he isn’t the hack there as he was in the hearing. G’day junior.
The Dems tried to use the false accusations to destroy Brett Kavanaugh in a purely political attack.
The Dems failed, again.
Well, they did make him cry like a b*tch for the world to see. Gee, what a great show of strength, Brett. This clown makes Obama look like Chuck Zito.
[Edited on 10/8/2018 by BoytonBrother]
You have to admit the muleski is improving. Went out of his way to confirm that he was in error by using the correct name of the second woman to report sexual abuse by Kavanaugh. He could have avoided using her name at all, or deleted the erroneous post where he referred to Ramirez as Rodriguez, or tried to deflect and bury the error under misinformation, or any one of his standard little tricks.
Red letter day on Whipping Post. The mule admits he was wrong. Wow.
Great thread. We all have to admit to being wrong sometimes.
Went out of his way to confirm that he was in error by using the correct name of the second woman to report sexual abuse by Kavanaugh
"Alleged" abuse
You have to admit the muleski is improving. Went out of his way to confirm that he was in error by using the correct name of the second woman to report sexual abuse by Kavanaugh. He could have avoided using her name at all, or deleted the erroneous post where he referred to Ramirez as Rodriguez, or tried to deflect and bury the error under misinformation, or any one of his standard little tricks.
Red letter day on Whipping Post. The mule admits he was wrong. Wow.
Great thread. We all have to admit to being wrong sometimes.
I went out of my way to prove you were wrong about accuser #2.
She, all the others and the left lefties lied.
There has never been any collaboration of the alleged accusations against Brett Kavanaugh.
You lost yet again.
While the lefties will of course keep crying...
President Trump, The Republicans and The American People will continue to Make America Great Again.
Fair correction.
That wasn't the point, however. The fact remains that muleski admitted to an error in referring to Ramirez as Rodriguez. A first for him.
It is better to light a candle than curse the darkness.
While the lefties will of course keep crying...
No, that was Kavanaugh crying when faced with pressure - want to see video of Crying Kavanaugh?
"Alleged" abuse
True and fair. But we'll colonize Mars before we see you offer this consideration to allegations on both sides of the aisle. Here comes the William Buckley quote.
There has never been any collaboration of the alleged accusations against Brett Kavanaugh.
The word you are looking for is "corroboration".
See, you are learning something new every day!
The word you are looking for is "corroboration".
He knew that, it was that darn autocorrect again, lol.
There has been no collaboration of Rodriguez' story.
A conservative supreme court will benefit "Corporations" and the "Ultra wealthy". they will take away a woman's right to choose. It will not benefit most Americans, and certainly not the gloating and not very bright, muleturd1994.
We The People won.
You lost.
There has never been any collaboration of the alleged accusations against Brett Kavanaugh.
The word you are looking for is "corroboration".
See, you are learning something new every day!
You need to learn English.
Both words are perfectly acceptable in this context.
Open your mind, learn something.
You have to admit the muleski is improving. Went out of his way to confirm that he was in error by using the correct name of the second woman to report sexual abuse by Kavanaugh. He could have avoided using her name at all, or deleted the erroneous post where he referred to Ramirez as Rodriguez, or tried to deflect and bury the error under misinformation, or any one of his standard little tricks.
Red letter day on Whipping Post. The mule admits he was wrong. Wow.
Great thread. We all have to admit to being wrong sometimes.
Well it’s a woman’s name that sounds like she could have ties to Mexico so.....
"Alleged" abuse
Here comes the William Buckley quote.
Buckley would think this is Mars if he came back today. There is no such thing as “conservative” anymore and we won’t ever have to listen to the nut case evangelical “family values” BS again. I do thank President Trump for that.
It is better to light a candle than curse the darkness.
😉
"Alleged" abuse
True and fair. But we'll colonize Mars before we see you offer this consideration to allegations on both sides of the aisle. Here comes the William Buckley quote.
All citizens of this Nation are innocent until proven guilty.
"Alleged" abuse
True and fair. But we'll colonize Mars before we see you offer this consideration to allegations on both sides of the aisle. Here comes the William Buckley quote.
All citizens of this Nation are innocent until proven guilty.
Only if you can afford a top notch legal defense.
And yourself?.... How would you respond to accusations and allegations that slandered your character? Would you believe yourself to be innocent until proven otherwise?
I sure as hell would.
"Alleged" abuse
True and fair. But we'll colonize Mars before we see you offer this consideration to allegations on both sides of the aisle. Here comes the William Buckley quote.
All citizens of this Nation are innocent until proven guilty.
Unless your name is Clinton.
