i love the babbling....wish there were more ideas
That big smile reminds me of when Eddie Murphy turned the device hooked to Morgan Fairchild (Whom I've not seen naked.) to 10.
i guess trump can solve syria based on what happened in the past.....with no new ideas.....element of surprise i guess
That big smile reminds me of when Eddie Murphy turned the device hooked to Morgan Fairchild (Whom I've not seen naked.) to 10.
Movie was "Holy Man"
What happened to the follow up on Bills sexcapades?
i guess trump can solve syria based on what happened in the past.....with no new ideas.....element of surprise i guess
No surprise over the re-taking of Mosul. Been out in the open for months.
Why is Wallace calling Social Security an "entitlement"? The deductions should again be taken away from going into the general fund and back into savings plans where it was the only government project that actually made money for the program.
the ACA....trump hates it.....hillary wants to adjust it......i as a business owner.....am concerned now about the rising costs to small businesses.....under 25 people....because it is getting to point of dropping insurance and putting employees on the ACA.....do you give them 5-10k raises to pay for it? and do you adjust that every year if the costs rise? i'm a little concerned about it. yes cost rose for last 20 years from 5 to 15 percent per year before it.....but... anyhow....yes i am becoming concerned about health care
What happened to the follow up on Bills sexcapades?
Bill isn't running for president.
nice debate...best one yet i think
I dont think Trumps balking on accepting the election results pledge meant much. At least he tells it like it is, not like the other spineless weasles who ignored their pledges.
I dont think Trumps balking on accepting the election results pledge meant much. At least he tells it like it is, not like the other spineless weasles who ignored their pledges.
It was spineless of him to say he may not accept the result. That is not how this democracy works.
press is making a big deal about trump questioning the future results of the election....instead of stuff that was said about other stuff
well i'll let you guys go into name calling mode.......i thought as i said....it was a good debate....didn't change my mind about anything but still
I dont think Trumps balking on accepting the election results pledge meant much. At least he tells it like it is, not like the other spineless weasles who ignored their pledges.
It was spineless of him to say he may not accept the result. That is not how this democracy works.
So Al Gore doesn't know how democracy works?
I dont think Trumps balking on accepting the election results pledge meant much. At least he tells it like it is, not like the other spineless weasles who ignored their pledges.
If it hadn't happened already, that was the moment he lost the election.
I dont think Trumps balking on accepting the election results pledge meant much. At least he tells it like it is, not like the other spineless weasles who ignored their pledges.
It was spineless of him to say he may not accept the result. That is not how this democracy works.
So Al Gore doesn't know how democracy works?
Totally different. There were questions about the count in Florida. After the courts ruled, Gore accepted the result. Trump is questioning the result before the vote is in.
I dont think Trumps balking on accepting the election results pledge meant much. At least he tells it like it is, not like the other spineless weasles who ignored their pledges.
It was spineless of him to say he may not accept the result. That is not how this democracy works.
So Al Gore doesn't know how democracy works?
Totally different. There were questions about the count in Florida. After the courts ruled, Gore accepted the result. Trump is questioning the result before the vote is in.
Amd the recount in Florida was triggered by Florida law, not by a crazy candidate.
I dont think Trumps balking on accepting the election results pledge meant much. At least he tells it like it is, not like the other spineless weasles who ignored their pledges.
It was spineless of him to say he may not accept the result. That is not how this democracy works.
So Al Gore doesn't know how democracy works?
The appeal to the Supreme Court to stop the recount was filed by Bush. I would think anyone interested in democracy would want every vote counted to the utmost accuracy.
Clinton says "He hasn't paid a penny of income tax."
That same guy that's a friend of Harry Reid told her so.
I dont think Trumps balking on accepting the election results pledge meant much. At least he tells it like it is, not like the other spineless weasles who ignored their pledges.
It was spineless of him to say he may not accept the result. That is not how this democracy works.
So Al Gore doesn't know how democracy works?
Totally different. There were questions about the count in Florida. After the courts ruled, Gore accepted the result. Trump is questioning the result before the vote is in.
On the other hand, the Gore campaign didn't hire operatives to start trouble at Bush rallies then blame the problems on Bush. This time around, that tactic was employed by the DNC and a false narrative was born. False narratives can effect an election before the votes are in.
Lies about false narratives do the same.......
I dont think Trumps balking on accepting the election results pledge meant much. At least he tells it like it is, not like the other spineless weasles who ignored their pledges.
It was spineless of him to say he may not accept the result. That is not how this democracy works.
So Al Gore doesn't know how democracy works?
Totally different. There were questions about the count in Florida. After the courts ruled, Gore accepted the result. Trump is questioning the result before the vote is in.
Amd the recount in Florida was triggered by Florida law, not by a crazy candidate.
The first recount was by law because of the closeness of the count. Gore kept wanting to change the election rules after the election so that those ballot cards that were earlier ruled out due to them not being eligible under the rules could be counted, several times. The rules were changed not once, but three times. Gore lost in all the recounts. He then tried to get the rules changed again so that if there was even a "dimple" on the chads the vote should be counted.
He finally conceded 36 days after the election when SCOTUS ruled on the Bush motion.
Doesn't sound to me that he accepted the results too readily.
The first recount was by law because of the closeness of the count.
Right, triggered by Florida law like I said.
Gore kept wanting to change the election rules after the election so that those ballot cards that were earlier ruled out due to them not being eligible under the rules could be counted, several times. The rules were changed not once, but three times. Gore lost in all the recounts. He then tried to get the rules changed again so that if there was even a "dimple" on the chads the vote should be counted.
He finally conceded 36 days after the election when SCOTUS ruled on the Bush motion.Doesn't sound to me that he accepted the results too readily.
Because it was close, not because it was "rigged".
Trump is on an island on this one...even the RNC has repudiated what he said.
"Nobody respects women more than me." —Donald Trump early in the debate
"Such a nasty woman." —Donald Trump later in the debate
The first recount was by law because of the closeness of the count.
Right, triggered by Florida law like I said.
Gore kept wanting to change the election rules after the election so that those ballot cards that were earlier ruled out due to them not being eligible under the rules could be counted, several times. The rules were changed not once, but three times. Gore lost in all the recounts. He then tried to get the rules changed again so that if there was even a "dimple" on the chads the vote should be counted.
He finally conceded 36 days after the election when SCOTUS ruled on the Bush motion.Doesn't sound to me that he accepted the results too readily.
Because it was close, not because it was "rigged".
Trump is on an island on this one...even the RNC has repudiated what he said.
No, the Florida vote was never claimed to be rigged, though some claimed the vote procedures favored different candidates.
Don't know how you came up with the 2000 election was rigged connection.
The election results were close enough that the recount was automatic as called for in the election rules.
Totally different. There were questions about the count in Florida. After the courts ruled, Gore accepted the result. Trump is questioning the result before the vote is in.
Amd the recount in Florida was triggered by Florida law, not by a crazy candidate.
The first recount was by law because of the closeness of the count. Gore kept wanting to change the election rules after the election so that those ballot cards that were earlier ruled out due to them not being eligible under the rules could be counted, several times. The rules were changed not once, but three times. Gore lost in all the recounts. He then tried to get the rules changed again so that if there was even a "dimple" on the chads the vote should be counted.
He finally conceded 36 days after the election when SCOTUS ruled on the Bush motion.
Doesn't sound to me that he accepted the results too readily.
To a revisionist it does.
On the other hand, the Gore campaign didn't hire operatives to start trouble at Bush rallies then blame the problems on Bush. This time around, that tactic was employed by the DNC and a false narrative was born. False narratives can effect an election before the votes are in.
As mentioned in the thread on this, the source of the videos is incredibly unreliable. Trump's own supporters have proven the do just fine at fighting all on their own.
On the other hand, the Gore campaign didn't hire operatives to start trouble at Bush rallies then blame the problems on Bush. This time around, that tactic was employed by the DNC and a false narrative was born. False narratives can effect an election before the votes are in.
As mentioned in the thread on this, the source of the videos is incredibly unreliable. Trump's own supporters have proven the do just fine at fighting all on their own.
Their own voices on tape aren't reliable? I guess people are losing their jobs over it for no reason.
Sure.
Anyone find it interesting that Trump invokes Douglas MacArthur, who was removed from command for, essentially, disseminating sensitive war time information to other governments and disobeying the President? He probably never read that chapter.
