All hands on deck. Its obvious the tactic is to just try and run out the clock and perhaps try to silence Assange. Let the Crooked Hillary waterboys keep worrying about who hacked Crooked Hillarys server and not about the actual content of the emails.
Everyone can see through this. And to our Wall Street posters whats it like to work for an industry forbidding employees from donating to Candidate Trump campaign? Will this actually be enforced? Do you get your balls back from HR in Dec?
You really don't understand much, do you?
BTW, if Trump is so good for business, why would Wall St. not want their employees to not contribute to Trump? Not that they are doing that. 😛
Silent Assange? Good luck with that.
All hands on deck. Its obvious the tactic is to just try and run out the clock and perhaps try to silence Assange. Let the Crooked Hillary waterboys keep worrying about who hacked Crooked Hillarys server and not about the actual content of the emails.
Everyone can see through this. And to our Wall Street posters whats it like to work for an industry forbidding employees from donating to Candidate Trump campaign? Will this actually be enforced? Do you get your balls back from HR in Dec?
There is also a Trump Game Plan. There is a well substantiated trend that pro-Trump posters are being hired by Russian intelligence to spread ant-Hillary propaganda. Are you in that category Goober? Are you a commie agent Goober? Do you get your balls from Vladimir Putin? Trump certainly does.
Assange is a convicted rapist. He got his data from the Russians who stole it from the US. Most people--including Paul Ryan--see this kind of plan and association as anti-American. It is also very chauvinistic as the attempt is to paint men who follow Hillary as less than men or "lacking balls" because they do not dominate women.
The real plan is to for Russian agents to undermine the US election by distracting people over an email practice that was also used in some version by Powell and Rice.
Obviously, paranoia is at an all-time high! 😉
You really don't understand much, do you?
BTW, if Trump is so good for business, why would Wall St. not want their employees to not contribute to Trump? Not that they are doing that. 😛
Wall St and corporate America don't want Trump because they're tied to the continuance of big govt, which Hillary represents far more than Trump. Big business loves big govt because they're better positioned to afford to work with regulation and pay off lawmakers to adjust things in their favor when needed. This reduces competition and keeps their world more predictable, not to mention the benefits of govt contracts for services they can provide.
I wish Trump was more outspoken about reducing govt, but big business and Wall St are much more comfortable with Hillary in this regard. Talk about not understanding...
You really don't understand much, do you?
BTW, if Trump is so good for business, why would Wall St. not want their employees to not contribute to Trump? Not that they are doing that. 😛
Wall St and corporate America don't want Trump because they're tied to the continuance of big govt, which Hillary represents far more than Trump. Big business loves big govt because they're better positioned to afford to work with regulation and pay off lawmakers to adjust things in their favor when needed. This reduces competition and keeps their world more predictable, not to mention the benefits of govt contracts for services they can provide.
I wish Trump was more outspoken about reducing govt, but big business and Wall St are much more comfortable with Hillary in this regard. Talk about not understanding...
Republicans talk about reducing big government, but government has grown under Reagan and G W Bush far more than under any Democrat. Republicans talk about fiscal responsibility, but the deficit was lowered under Clinton and Reagan. W's two wars did more to raise the debt and create big government than Obama or Clinton ever did. And big business loved it. Keep beating that drum. You can repeat your mantra over and over again, but you still will be wrong.
You really don't understand much, do you?
BTW, if Trump is so good for business, why would Wall St. not want their employees to not contribute to Trump? Not that they are doing that. 😛
Wall St and corporate America don't want Trump because they're tied to the continuance of big govt, which Hillary represents far more than Trump. Big business loves big govt because they're better positioned to afford to work with regulation and pay off lawmakers to adjust things in their favor when needed. This reduces competition and keeps their world more predictable, not to mention the benefits of govt contracts for services they can provide.
I wish Trump was more outspoken about reducing govt, but big business and Wall St are much more comfortable with Hillary in this regard. Talk about not understanding...
Republicans talk about reducing big government, but government has grown under Reagan and G W Bush far more than under any Democrat. Republicans talk about fiscal responsibility, but the deficit was lowered under Clinton and Reagan. W's two wars did more to raise the debt and create big government than Obama or Clinton ever did. And big business loved it. Keep beating that drum. You can repeat your mantra over and over again, but you still will be wrong.
That wasn't the point. The D's have become the party of Wall St & big business because of the cronyism inherent with big govt.
Open immigration that suppresses wages and keeps labor cheap? Check that off for the D's. Manipulated low interest rates that force the masses into the stock market, widening the income gap as the rich make out far better and take less risk? Check that off for the D's too.
Hillary, Obama, and the D's are now the party owning these issues, like it or not. And in return they offer crumbs to the middle and lower classes. Wake up and at least understand what that party represents.
Free contraceptives and trans-gender bathrooms will never outweigh real opportunity in a free economy.
Obviously, paranoia is at an all-time high! 😉
Well, Trump just gave a speech on Russian National Television, again fawning over Putin.
This is Putin early this year
“You know that I, like millions of Soviet citizens, over 20 million, was a member of the Communist Party of the USSR and not only was I a member of the party but I worked for almost 20 years for an organization called the Committee for State Security,” Putin said, referring to the KGB.
“I was not, as you know, a party member by necessity,” he said. “I liked Communist and socialist ideas very much and I like them still.”
http://www.newsweek.com/russias-putin-says-he-always-liked-communist-socialist-ideas-419289
It is hard from this adulation, and Fuji's comments that the Democrats are now the oppressive capitalists, to infer that the Republicans must be the communists. 😮
You really don't understand much, do you?
BTW, if Trump is so good for business, why would Wall St. not want their employees to not contribute to Trump? Not that they are doing that. 😛
Wall St and corporate America don't want Trump because they're tied to the continuance of big govt, which Hillary represents far more than Trump. Big business loves big govt because they're better positioned to afford to work with regulation and pay off lawmakers to adjust things in their favor when needed. This reduces competition and keeps their world more predictable, not to mention the benefits of govt contracts for services they can provide.
I wish Trump was more outspoken about reducing govt, but big business and Wall St are much more comfortable with Hillary in this regard. Talk about not understanding...
Republicans talk about reducing big government, but government has grown under Reagan and G W Bush far more than under any Democrat. Republicans talk about fiscal responsibility, but the deficit was lowered under Clinton and Reagan. W's two wars did more to raise the debt and create big government than Obama or Clinton ever did. And big business loved it. Keep beating that drum. You can repeat your mantra over and over again, but you still will be wrong.
That wasn't the point. The D's have become the party of Wall St & big business because of the cronyism inherent with big govt.
Open immigration that suppresses wages and keeps labor cheap? Check that off for the D's. Manipulated low interest rates that force the masses into the stock market, widening the income gap as the rich make out far better and take less risk? Check that off for the D's too.
Hillary, Obama, and the D's are now the party owning these issues, like it or not. And in return they offer crumbs to the middle and lower classes. Wake up and at least understand what that party represents.
Free contraceptives and trans-gender bathrooms will never outweigh real opportunity in a free economy.
with the exception of the last sentence Karl Marx and Frederick Engels made all these points in the Communist Manifesto.
You really don't understand much, do you?
BTW, if Trump is so good for business, why would Wall St. not want their employees to not contribute to Trump? Not that they are doing that. 😛
Wall St and corporate America don't want Trump because they're tied to the continuance of big govt, which Hillary represents far more than Trump. Big business loves big govt because they're better positioned to afford to work with regulation and pay off lawmakers to adjust things in their favor when needed. This reduces competition and keeps their world more predictable, not to mention the benefits of govt contracts for services they can provide.
I wish Trump was more outspoken about reducing govt, but big business and Wall St are much more comfortable with Hillary in this regard. Talk about not understanding...
Republicans talk about reducing big government, but government has grown under Reagan and G W Bush far more than under any Democrat. Republicans talk about fiscal responsibility, but the deficit was lowered under Clinton and Reagan. W's two wars did more to raise the debt and create big government than Obama or Clinton ever did. And big business loved it. Keep beating that drum. You can repeat your mantra over and over again, but you still will be wrong.
That wasn't the point. The D's have become the party of Wall St & big business because of the cronyism inherent with big govt.
Open immigration that suppresses wages and keeps labor cheap? Check that off for the D's. Manipulated low interest rates that force the masses into the stock market, widening the income gap as the rich make out far better and take less risk? Check that off for the D's too.
Hillary, Obama, and the D's are now the party owning these issues, like it or not. And in return they offer crumbs to the middle and lower classes. Wake up and at least understand what that party represents.
Free contraceptives and trans-gender bathrooms will never outweigh real opportunity in a free economy.
with the exception of the last sentence Karl Marx and Frederick Engels made all these points in the Communist Manifesto.
It is hard from this adulation, and Fuji's comments that the Democrats are now the oppressive capitalists, to infer that the Republicans must be the communists.
Infer away - but I said or suggested nothing of the sort.
All I'm pointing out is that if anyone thinks the D's are aligned against the natural cronyism of big govt and big business, they couldn't be more wrong. And because of that, any perception that they will economically "fix" anything for the lower classes is hogwash. Their policies result in the uber wealthy becoming more so, which is why Wall St and corporations align with Hillary & the D's - its in their fiscal interest to do so. I'll add the the R's have done nothing to help this either - despite claims of wanting smaller govt.
It is hard from this adulation, and Fuji's comments that the Democrats are now the oppressive capitalists, to infer that the Republicans must be the communists.
Infer away - but I said or suggested nothing of the sort.
All I'm pointing out is that if anyone thinks the D's are aligned against the natural cronyism of big govt and big business, they couldn't be more wrong. And because of that, any perception that they will economically "fix" anything for the lower classes is hogwash. Their policies result in the uber wealthy becoming more so, which is why Wall St and corporations align with Hillary & the D's - its in their fiscal interest to do so. I'll add the the R's have done nothing to help this either - despite claims of wanting smaller govt.
I don't disagree with any of this. I just want to make sure the nomenclature is correct. There was a journal called the Monthly Review that made these points in every issue. Angela Davis maintained as long as Americans had televisions they would never collectively challenge this system.
The fact is that in the US even poor people have some resources and for a number of reasons believe that opportunity or change is around the corner. Politicians work off of this hope and as you say keep promising change and improvement that never arrives. This is the critique of the Clintons in the African American community as well.
You really don't understand much, do you?
BTW, if Trump is so good for business, why would Wall St. not want their employees to not contribute to Trump? Not that they are doing that. 😛
Wall St and corporate America don't want Trump because they're tied to the continuance of big govt, which Hillary represents far more than Trump. Big business loves big govt because they're better positioned to afford to work with regulation and pay off lawmakers to adjust things in their favor when needed. This reduces competition and keeps their world more predictable, not to mention the benefits of govt contracts for services they can provide.
I wish Trump was more outspoken about reducing govt, but big business and Wall St are much more comfortable with Hillary in this regard. Talk about not understanding...
Republicans talk about reducing big government, but government has grown under Reagan and G W Bush far more than under any Democrat. Republicans talk about fiscal responsibility, but the deficit was lowered under Clinton and Reagan. W's two wars did more to raise the debt and create big government than Obama or Clinton ever did. And big business loved it. Keep beating that drum. You can repeat your mantra over and over again, but you still will be wrong.
That wasn't the point. The D's have become the party of Wall St & big business because of the cronyism inherent with big govt.
Open immigration that suppresses wages and keeps labor cheap? Check that off for the D's. Manipulated low interest rates that force the masses into the stock market, widening the income gap as the rich make out far better and take less risk? Check that off for the D's too.
Hillary, Obama, and the D's are now the party owning these issues, like it or not. And in return they offer crumbs to the middle and lower classes. Wake up and at least understand what that party represents.
Free contraceptives and trans-gender bathrooms will never outweigh real opportunity in a free economy.
You said that Wall Street loves the Dems because they are the party of big government. When I point out that the GOP is historically the party that grows government, you say that isn't the point and change the narrative to something else. Yeah, I am the one who doesn't understand.
Real opportunity won't happen under a president who outsourced all of his manufacturing to other countries.
Fiscal responsibility won't occur with a president who refuses to pay contractors that he hired.
Small business won't grow with a president who has historically forced small businesses to close because he would not pay him.
The country won't move forward with a president who set up a "university" that had the sole purpose of defrauding its students.
The country cannot exist with a president who gets others to invest in his casinos, then files for bankruptcy leaving him with money and his investors penniless.
But, yeah, Hillary is crooked. Genius.
You really don't understand much, do you?
BTW, if Trump is so good for business, why would Wall St. not want their employees to not contribute to Trump? Not that they are doing that. 😛
Wall St and corporate America don't want Trump because they're tied to the continuance of big govt, which Hillary represents far more than Trump. Big business loves big govt because they're better positioned to afford to work with regulation and pay off lawmakers to adjust things in their favor when needed. This reduces competition and keeps their world more predictable, not to mention the benefits of govt contracts for services they can provide.
I wish Trump was more outspoken about reducing govt, but big business and Wall St are much more comfortable with Hillary in this regard. Talk about not understanding...
Republicans talk about reducing big government, but government has grown under Reagan and G W Bush far more than under any Democrat. Republicans talk about fiscal responsibility, but the deficit was lowered under Clinton and Reagan. W's two wars did more to raise the debt and create big government than Obama or Clinton ever did. And big business loved it. Keep beating that drum. You can repeat your mantra over and over again, but you still will be wrong.
That wasn't the point. The D's have become the party of Wall St & big business because of the cronyism inherent with big govt.
Open immigration that suppresses wages and keeps labor cheap? Check that off for the D's. Manipulated low interest rates that force the masses into the stock market, widening the income gap as the rich make out far better and take less risk? Check that off for the D's too.
Hillary, Obama, and the D's are now the party owning these issues, like it or not. And in return they offer crumbs to the middle and lower classes. Wake up and at least understand what that party represents.
Free contraceptives and trans-gender bathrooms will never outweigh real opportunity in a free economy.
Home Run.
On low interest rates....Rates have been next to zero during Obama's entire run and we've traded that plus another $10 Trillion in debt for a no-growth economy. This seems impossible even if you tried, but he pulled it off.
You really don't understand much, do you?
BTW, if Trump is so good for business, why would Wall St. not want their employees to not contribute to Trump? Not that they are doing that. 😛
Wall St and corporate America don't want Trump because they're tied to the continuance of big govt, which Hillary represents far more than Trump. Big business loves big govt because they're better positioned to afford to work with regulation and pay off lawmakers to adjust things in their favor when needed. This reduces competition and keeps their world more predictable, not to mention the benefits of govt contracts for services they can provide.
I wish Trump was more outspoken about reducing govt, but big business and Wall St are much more comfortable with Hillary in this regard. Talk about not understanding...
Republicans talk about reducing big government, but government has grown under Reagan and G W Bush far more than under any Democrat. Republicans talk about fiscal responsibility, but the deficit was lowered under Clinton and Reagan. W's two wars did more to raise the debt and create big government than Obama or Clinton ever did. And big business loved it. Keep beating that drum. You can repeat your mantra over and over again, but you still will be wrong.
That wasn't the point. The D's have become the party of Wall St & big business because of the cronyism inherent with big govt.
Open immigration that suppresses wages and keeps labor cheap? Check that off for the D's. Manipulated low interest rates that force the masses into the stock market, widening the income gap as the rich make out far better and take less risk? Check that off for the D's too.
Hillary, Obama, and the D's are now the party owning these issues, like it or not. And in return they offer crumbs to the middle and lower classes. Wake up and at least understand what that party represents.
Free contraceptives and trans-gender bathrooms will never outweigh real opportunity in a free economy.
Home Run.
On low interest rates....Rates have been next to zero during Obama's entire run and we've traded that plus another $10 Trillion in debt for a no-growth economy. This seems impossible even if you tried, but he pulled it off.
Again with the no growth economy. Keep repeating that and someone other than you might believe it some day.