No modern Army has invaded the United States and one of the biggest deterrents is because Americans are armed which is the point of the second Amendment.
Completely ludacris.
Again I ask, HOW is expanding background checks going to hurt YOU, or take away YOUR rights to be a gun hoarder if you are a law abiding citizen of sound mental health???. BTW 90 percent of americans agree with this.
1) Just how do you want to expand the background checks? They already check for criminal record and if the person was mentally adjudged "defective". Read the ATF Form 4473 I posted and look at the questions it asks.
2) Where are all these differing percentage points about gun control coming from? Could someone please post a link to where this information is.
_______________________________________________________________________
Don’t look for an answer.
1.) The liberals scream for “gun-control” but never offer legislation that addresses the actual problems with the broken background check system, ties in a nation-wide mental health records system (that doesn’t exist) nor will democrat governors and mayors enforce the laws.
2.) You’ll never get a link because the numbers the liberals here state come from left-wing blogs and opinion pieces. No basis in fact.
Now the left is trying a no-fly no-buy line. It doesn’t seem to occur to them that the no-fly list is even worse than the so-called “terrorist watch list”. Neither list is anywhere close to accurate or complete. The Department of Homeland Security has 65 armed employees on the no-fly list. If you follow the lefts plan those DHS employees would have to have their service weapons taken away.
You have a link to prove that bit about 65 Homeland Security people on the no fly list? No? Didn't think so. And don't tell me to do my own research. As you put it in another thread, you made the claim, either prove it or STFU. 😛
Again I ask, HOW is expanding background checks going to hurt YOU, or take away YOUR rights to be a gun hoarder if you are a law abiding citizen of sound mental health???. BTW 90 percent of americans agree with this.
1) Just how do you want to expand the background checks? They already check for criminal record and if the person was mentally adjudged "defective". Read the ATF Form 4473 I posted and look at the questions it asks.
2) Where are all these differing percentage points about gun control coming from? Could someone please post a link to where this information is.
_______________________________________________________________________
Don’t look for an answer.
1.) The liberals scream for “gun-control” but never offer legislation that addresses the actual problems with the broken background check system, ties in a nation-wide mental health records system (that doesn’t exist) nor will democrat governors and mayors enforce the laws.
2.) You’ll never get a link because the numbers the liberals here state come from left-wing blogs and opinion pieces. No basis in fact.
Now the left is trying a no-fly no-buy line. It doesn’t seem to occur to them that the no-fly list is even worse than the so-called “terrorist watch list”. Neither list is anywhere close to accurate or complete. The Department of Homeland Security has 65 armed employees on the no-fly list. If you follow the lefts plan those DHS employees would have to have their service weapons taken away.
You have a link to prove that bit about 65 Homeland Security people on the no fly list? No? Didn't think so. And don't tell me to do my own research. As you put it in another thread, you made the claim, either prove it or STFU. 😛
________________________________________________________________________
Testimony before Congress by the Secretary of Homeland Security.
Learn how to gather data son or just stay uninformed.
Again I ask, HOW is expanding background checks going to hurt YOU, or take away YOUR rights to be a gun hoarder if you are a law abiding citizen of sound mental health???. BTW 90 percent of americans agree with this.
1) Just how do you want to expand the background checks? They already check for criminal record and if the person was mentally adjudged "defective". Read the ATF Form 4473 I posted and look at the questions it asks.
2) Where are all these differing percentage points about gun control coming from? Could someone please post a link to where this information is.
_______________________________________________________________________
Don’t look for an answer.
1.) The liberals scream for “gun-control” but never offer legislation that addresses the actual problems with the broken background check system, ties in a nation-wide mental health records system (that doesn’t exist) nor will democrat governors and mayors enforce the laws.
2.) You’ll never get a link because the numbers the liberals here state come from left-wing blogs and opinion pieces. No basis in fact.
Now the left is trying a no-fly no-buy line. It doesn’t seem to occur to them that the no-fly list is even worse than the so-called “terrorist watch list”. Neither list is anywhere close to accurate or complete. The Department of Homeland Security has 65 armed employees on the no-fly list. If you follow the lefts plan those DHS employees would have to have their service weapons taken away.
You have a link to prove that bit about 65 Homeland Security people on the no fly list? No? Didn't think so. And don't tell me to do my own research. As you put it in another thread, you made the claim, either prove it or STFU. 😛
________________________________________________________________________
Testimony before Congress by the Secretary of Homeland Security.
Learn how to gather data son or just stay uninformed.
Where is the link? Provide a link or STFU. 😛
Again I ask, HOW is expanding background checks going to hurt YOU, or take away YOUR rights to be a gun hoarder if you are a law abiding citizen of sound mental health???. BTW 90 percent of americans agree with this.
1) Just how do you want to expand the background checks? They already check for criminal record and if the person was mentally adjudged "defective". Read the ATF Form 4473 I posted and look at the questions it asks.
2) Where are all these differing percentage points about gun control coming from? Could someone please post a link to where this information is.
_______________________________________________________________________
Don’t look for an answer.
1.) The liberals scream for “gun-control” but never offer legislation that addresses the actual problems with the broken background check system, ties in a nation-wide mental health records system (that doesn’t exist) nor will democrat governors and mayors enforce the laws.
2.) You’ll never get a link because the numbers the liberals here state come from left-wing blogs and opinion pieces. No basis in fact.
Now the left is trying a no-fly no-buy line. It doesn’t seem to occur to them that the no-fly list is even worse than the so-called “terrorist watch list”. Neither list is anywhere close to accurate or complete. The Department of Homeland Security has 65 armed employees on the no-fly list. If you follow the lefts plan those DHS employees would have to have their service weapons taken away.
You have a link to prove that bit about 65 Homeland Security people on the no fly list? No? Didn't think so. And don't tell me to do my own research. As you put it in another thread, you made the claim, either prove it or STFU. 😛
________________________________________________________________________
Testimony before Congress by the Secretary of Homeland Security.
Learn how to gather data son or just stay uninformed.
Where is the link? Provide a link or STFU. 😛
________________________________________________________________________
Apparently you are too stupid to lookup public information from The Congressional Record.
Learn how to gather data son or just stay uninformed.
Again I ask, HOW is expanding background checks going to hurt YOU, or take away YOUR rights to be a gun hoarder if you are a law abiding citizen of sound mental health???. BTW 90 percent of americans agree with this.
1) Just how do you want to expand the background checks? They already check for criminal record and if the person was mentally adjudged "defective". Read the ATF Form 4473 I posted and look at the questions it asks.
2) Where are all these differing percentage points about gun control coming from? Could someone please post a link to where this information is.
_______________________________________________________________________
Don’t look for an answer.
1.) The liberals scream for “gun-control” but never offer legislation that addresses the actual problems with the broken background check system, ties in a nation-wide mental health records system (that doesn’t exist) nor will democrat governors and mayors enforce the laws.
2.) You’ll never get a link because the numbers the liberals here state come from left-wing blogs and opinion pieces. No basis in fact.
Now the left is trying a no-fly no-buy line. It doesn’t seem to occur to them that the no-fly list is even worse than the so-called “terrorist watch list”. Neither list is anywhere close to accurate or complete. The Department of Homeland Security has 65 armed employees on the no-fly list. If you follow the lefts plan those DHS employees would have to have their service weapons taken away.
You have a link to prove that bit about 65 Homeland Security people on the no fly list? No? Didn't think so. And don't tell me to do my own research. As you put it in another thread, you made the claim, either prove it or STFU. 😛
________________________________________________________________________
Testimony before Congress by the Secretary of Homeland Security.
Learn how to gather data son or just stay uninformed.
Where is the link? Provide a link or STFU. 😛
________________________________________________________________________
Apparently you are too stupid to lookup public information from The Congressional Record.
Learn how to gather data son or just stay uninformed.
Muleman said earlier today
You made the claim, you back it up. I don’t’ do research for people too lazy or incompetent to back up their own false claims.
It is the liberals who want the people dependent on the government aka the working people.
Obama is the food stamp president as under Obama’s administration there has been a 44% increase in food stamp recipients.
Wal-Mart is not successful because of “other government assistance” and you cannot prove it.
Again, prove it or STFU.
http://www.allmanbrothersband.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=XForum&file=viewthread&tid=140609
But now everyone has to prove his point.
Can't have it both ways, little boy.
Again I ask, HOW is expanding background checks going to hurt YOU, or take away YOUR rights to be a gun hoarder if you are a law abiding citizen of sound mental health???. BTW 90 percent of americans agree with this.
1) Just how do you want to expand the background checks? They already check for criminal record and if the person was mentally adjudged "defective". Read the ATF Form 4473 I posted and look at the questions it asks.
2) Where are all these differing percentage points about gun control coming from? Could someone please post a link to where this information is.
_______________________________________________________________________
Don’t look for an answer.
1.) The liberals scream for “gun-control” but never offer legislation that addresses the actual problems with the broken background check system, ties in a nation-wide mental health records system (that doesn’t exist) nor will democrat governors and mayors enforce the laws.
2.) You’ll never get a link because the numbers the liberals here state come from left-wing blogs and opinion pieces. No basis in fact.
Now the left is trying a no-fly no-buy line. It doesn’t seem to occur to them that the no-fly list is even worse than the so-called “terrorist watch list”. Neither list is anywhere close to accurate or complete. The Department of Homeland Security has 65 armed employees on the no-fly list. If you follow the lefts plan those DHS employees would have to have their service weapons taken away.
You have a link to prove that bit about 65 Homeland Security people on the no fly list? No? Didn't think so. And don't tell me to do my own research. As you put it in another thread, you made the claim, either prove it or STFU. 😛
________________________________________________________________________
Testimony before Congress by the Secretary of Homeland Security.
Learn how to gather data son or just stay uninformed.Where is the link? Provide a link or STFU. 😛
________________________________________________________________________
Apparently you are too stupid to lookup public information from The Congressional Record.
Learn how to gather data son or just stay uninformed.
Muleman said earlier today
You made the claim, you back it up. I don’t’ do research for people too lazy or incompetent to back up their own false claims.
It is the liberals who want the people dependent on the government aka the working people.
Obama is the food stamp president as under Obama’s administration there has been a 44% increase in food stamp recipients.
Wal-Mart is not successful because of “other government assistance” and you cannot prove it.
Again, prove it or STFU.
http://www.allmanbrothersband.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=XForum&file=viewthread&tid=140609
But now everyone has to prove his point.
Can't have it both ways, little boy.
So let's turn that around a little bit. Those who have posted the various percentage numbers about how many people want more "gun control" can either put up a STFU, as directed by jkeller.
So let's turn that around a little bit. Those who have posted the various percentage numbers about how many people want more "gun control" can either put up a STFU, as directed by jkeller.
Muleman94 is the one telling posters to STFU when he is pressured to provide sources for his outrageous claims.
On the gun control issue it would be a real classy action if gun owners took a step away from the NRA and announced that they had agreed to adopt a community system of gun control.
The stats are in after almost one year of public gun sharing in Chicago and to say the least it's been a success. It's time for other cities to follow suit and put more guns on the streets by making guns more readily and conveniently available to both citizens and tourists.
Chicago Introduces New Citywide Gun-Sharing Stations
January 19, 2015
Chicago Introduces New Citywide Gun-Sharing Stations
January 19, 2015
Chicago’s new QuikShot gun-share system is modeled on a similar program successfully introduced overseas in Caracas, Venezuela.
CHICAGO—Touting the program’s convenience and affordability, Chicago officials unveiled Monday the city’s new gun-sharing service, “QuikShot,” which allows individuals to check out a loaded firearm for short periods of time.
The municipal initiative, through which users can rent semiautomatic pistols, shotguns, rifles, and submachine guns at more than 250 self-service kiosks, has reportedly been designed to make firepower easily available to residents and tourists alike nearly everywhere within the city limits.
“QuikShot lets anyone with a credit card walk up to one of our street-side firearm stations, select a gun, and head out into the Windy City fully armed in just a few seconds,” program director Arvind Reynolds told reporters, noting that borrowers can either rent their weapon for increments of 30 minutes or withdraw it for a full 24 hours if they plan on using it throughout the day. “With QuikShot, you and your friends can each take a Beretta up to Wrigley Field, or you can head to an outdoor concert in Millennium Park with a concealed 9mm revolver, or you can simply take in the great view of the Magnificent Mile from the roof deck of the Hancock tower through a scoped sniper rifle. The possibilities are truly endless with QuikShot.”
“And if the guns at one station are all checked out, users only have to walk a block or two to the next one in order to find a loaded firearm,” he added. “So whether you’ve been planning an outing for a while or simply decided to head out in the spur of the moment, QuikShot has you covered.”
According to sources, after paying a small registration fee, QuikShot users may rent a firearm as often as they wish in neighborhoods ranging from Edgewater in the north, to the downtown Loop business district, to Hyde Park on the South Side, allowing them to brandish and discharge one or more rounds wherever they choose to in the city. Additionally, due to higher demand, Chicago officials said that multiple QuikShot kiosks would be opened around highly trafficked destinations, such as Navy Pier, the Art Institute, the Water Tower Place shopping center, and the Chicago Lakefront running and cycling paths.
Because the firearms are expected to see heavy use, Reynolds confirmed that repair crews would regularly monitor the city’s reholstering docks in order to clean and reload the weapons, as well as to replace guns that have jammed or misfired during operation, ensuring that borrowers aren’t inconvenienced by their gun malfunctioning at a crucial moment.
“It’s a great addition to the city—nothing beats being able to run out of my apartment and have a gun in my hands whenever I want.”
Users, however, are reportedly expected to provide their own protective Kevlar body armor, with program administrators adding that the city of Chicago is not liable for any injuries incurred due to use of its rentals.
“It’s a great addition to the city—nothing beats being able to run out of my apartment and have a gun in my hands whenever I want,” said Lincoln Park resident Keith Madsen, 32, noting that a QuikShot membership is much more economical than purchasing and maintaining his own extended magazine AR-15 assault rifle. “Even if I’m not necessarily planning on firing a gun on any given day, it’s always nice to know that I have the option if something comes up.”
Sources confirmed that the city is planning to expand the service in the months ahead by purchasing more guns, with the goal of increasing its publicly available arsenal to more than 65,000 weapons in anticipation of the hot summer months, when QuikShot usage is expected to reach its peak.
“QuikShot is so easy that I’m actually shooting a handgun way more often than I normally would,” said local resident Danny Taylor, who participated in a pilot trial of the program, as he deposited an empty .357 Magnum with the QuikShot logo imprinted on its grip at a Rogers Park reholstering station. “Whether I’m going to a house party or just to the liquor store, it’s nice to know that I can grab a piece, use it for as long as I want, and then drop it off without a lot of fuss.”
“In fact, I’m thinking about checking out one tomorrow morning before I head into the office,” he continued.
http://www.theonion.com/article/chicago-introduces-new-citywide-gun-sharing-statio-37797
I've visited Chicago more than 20 times and haven't been shot once. Not once I tell you!
I've visited Chicago more than 20 times and haven't been shot once. Not once I tell you!
___________________________________________________________________________
So, you are okay with the killing fields of Chicago? Almost 1,000 black people murdered by other black people is nothing you care about?
So, you are okay with the killing fields of Chicago? Almost 1,000 black people murdered by other black people is nothing you care about?
Absolutely.
{That's sarcasm. You are a complete and utter moron filled with vile hate. I am beyond irritated with your disgusting, putrid, odious, venomous, and abhorrent rancor. Your provocations are a cancer on humanity. I read your filth and see only blackness and evil. I truly hope that one day your burden is lifted so that you might find joy in this life.}
That's sarcasm. You are a complete and utter moron filled with vile hate. I am beyond irritated with your disgusting, putrid, odious, venomous, and abhorrent rancor. Your provocations are a cancer on humanity. I read your filth and see only blackness and evil.
You really shouldn't say things that make him feel good....
I've visited Chicago more than 20 times and haven't been shot once. Not once I tell you!
___________________________________________________________________________
So, you are okay with the killing fields of Chicago? Almost 1,000 black people murdered by other black people is nothing you care about?
Repeating a lie over and over doesn't make it true.
463 murders in Chicago this year - total, not black on black.............
http://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/2015-chicago-murders
I've visited Chicago more than 20 times and haven't been shot once. Not once I tell you!
___________________________________________________________________________
So, you are okay with the killing fields of Chicago? Almost 1,000 black people murdered by other black people is nothing you care about?
Repeating a lie over and over doesn't make it true.
463 murders in Chicago this year - total, not black on black.............
_________________________________________________________________________
Not according to the FBI.
Now, try and find a teenager than can show you how to look up FBI statistics.
So like the liberals to argue over the number of dead people while ignoring the fact that shootings and murders are out of control.
Well, it is a Democrat controlled city.
Wrong . Again. Post a link to FBI stats.... but we all know you are lying.......
Conservatives have to make up stats and keep repeating them like they are fact......
Illinois has a republican governor - can't believe this is all happening on a republican's watch..... 😛 😛
Illinois has a republican governor - can't believe this is all happening on a republican's watch..... 😛 😛
_________________________________________________________________________
Nice try.
Chicago has been run by Democrats for over 80 years.
So where is that FBI link? 😛
So where is that FBI link? 😛
________________________________________________________________________
I don't do research for anyone too incompetent or stupid to do basic data mining.
I've visited Chicago more than 20 times and haven't been shot once. Not once I tell you!
___________________________________________________________________________
So, you are okay with the killing fields of Chicago? Almost 1,000 black people murdered by other black people is nothing you care about?
Repeating a lie over and over doesn't make it true.
463 murders in Chicago this year - total, not black on black.............
_________________________________________________________________________
Not according to the FBI.
Now, try and find a teenager than can show you how to look up FBI statistics.So like the liberals to argue over the number of dead people while ignoring the fact that shootings and murders are out of control.
Well, it is a Democrat controlled city.
In these links that you will not read, it points out 2 things. The first is that the FBI gets its data from the local police departments. Second, Chicago is nowhere near the worst city for violent crime. In fact, it lags far behind many cities including Baltimore. That is in Maryland. Where you live.
http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2015/10/22/violent-crime-statistics-for-every-city-in-america/
I look forward to your idiotic response.
Bernie is a idiot and what he says is treason, the second amendment is the right of the people to bear arms the same arms the military has that is the whole point! how can their be a militia without military arms? DUH!
I will agree that the NRA does not represent me in fact I am not even a member IMO they waste to much money begging the members for more money.
Common sense dictates that you know that criminals will always have illegal guns because they are criminals got it? and i also believe if we were much harder on criminals that use a gun in a crime would lead to less gun crime but there is no way you can have a mental test to qualify for a gun purchase I mean who makes up this test are they pro gun or anti gun what questions do you ask everyone has bad days or feels depressed about something are you then disqualified? folks you have to use common sense.
Which "well organized militia" do you belong to?
I don't belong to any militia which one do you belong too? BUT i have the right to if I choose to just as you do and like the right to free speech which I am using right now I choose to keep the right to bear arms you may not care and that is your right .
P. S. that was really a dumb question...... because it has nothing to do with gun control it is just another attempt to bait someone into a argument which I won't do...
No, it wasn't a dumb question because the second amendment clearly uses the words "a well regulated militia". And you are a proud gun owner who believes in the second amendment. Apparently you forgot that part.
_______________________________________________________________________
Wrong again dumba$$.
The Supreme Court has ruled, many times, that the Constitution's 2nd Amendment ensures an individuals right to bear and keep arms.
But of course as all Supreme Court rulings are part of the public record because you have repeatedly proven your are too stupid to look it up.
Bernie is a idiot and what he says is treason, the second amendment is the right of the people to bear arms the same arms the military has that is the whole point! how can their be a militia without military arms? DUH!
I will agree that the NRA does not represent me in fact I am not even a member IMO they waste to much money begging the members for more money.
Common sense dictates that you know that criminals will always have illegal guns because they are criminals got it? and i also believe if we were much harder on criminals that use a gun in a crime would lead to less gun crime but there is no way you can have a mental test to qualify for a gun purchase I mean who makes up this test are they pro gun or anti gun what questions do you ask everyone has bad days or feels depressed about something are you then disqualified? folks you have to use common sense.
Which "well organized militia" do you belong to?
I don't belong to any militia which one do you belong too? BUT i have the right to if I choose to just as you do and like the right to free speech which I am using right now I choose to keep the right to bear arms you may not care and that is your right .
P. S. that was really a dumb question...... because it has nothing to do with gun control it is just another attempt to bait someone into a argument which I won't do...
No, it wasn't a dumb question because the second amendment clearly uses the words "a well regulated militia". And you are a proud gun owner who believes in the second amendment. Apparently you forgot that part.
_______________________________________________________________________
Wrong again dumba$$.
The Supreme Court has ruled, many times, that the Constitution's 2nd Amendment ensures an individuals right to bear and keep arms.
But of course as all Supreme Court rulings are part of the public record because you have repeatedly proven your are too stupid to look it up.
Wrong again. The question wasn't intended for you because I knew that you would miss the point of it. Two adults were having a discussion. We didn't need the input of a misanthropic Burger King burger flipper.
Bernie is a idiot and what he says is treason, the second amendment is the right of the people to bear arms the same arms the military has that is the whole point! how can their be a militia without military arms? DUH!
I will agree that the NRA does not represent me in fact I am not even a member IMO they waste to much money begging the members for more money.
Common sense dictates that you know that criminals will always have illegal guns because they are criminals got it? and i also believe if we were much harder on criminals that use a gun in a crime would lead to less gun crime but there is no way you can have a mental test to qualify for a gun purchase I mean who makes up this test are they pro gun or anti gun what questions do you ask everyone has bad days or feels depressed about something are you then disqualified? folks you have to use common sense.
Which "well organized militia" do you belong to?
I don't belong to any militia which one do you belong too? BUT i have the right to if I choose to just as you do and like the right to free speech which I am using right now I choose to keep the right to bear arms you may not care and that is your right .
P. S. that was really a dumb question...... because it has nothing to do with gun control it is just another attempt to bait someone into a argument which I won't do...
No, it wasn't a dumb question because the second amendment clearly uses the words "a well regulated militia". And you are a proud gun owner who believes in the second amendment. Apparently you forgot that part.
_______________________________________________________________________
Wrong again dumba$$.
The Supreme Court has ruled, many times, that the Constitution's 2nd Amendment ensures an individuals right to bear and keep arms.
But of course as all Supreme Court rulings are part of the public record because you have repeatedly proven your are too stupid to look it up.
Wrong again. The question wasn't intended for you because I knew that you would miss the point of it. Two adults were having a discussion. We didn't need the input of a misanthropic Burger King burger flipper.
_______________________________________________________________________
This site provides a PM system for a private discussion.
the W/P is open to anyone and everyone.
Freedom of Speech will not be curtailed by the liberals.
Bernie is a idiot and what he says is treason, the second amendment is the right of the people to bear arms the same arms the military has that is the whole point! how can their be a militia without military arms? DUH!
I will agree that the NRA does not represent me in fact I am not even a member IMO they waste to much money begging the members for more money.
Common sense dictates that you know that criminals will always have illegal guns because they are criminals got it? and i also believe if we were much harder on criminals that use a gun in a crime would lead to less gun crime but there is no way you can have a mental test to qualify for a gun purchase I mean who makes up this test are they pro gun or anti gun what questions do you ask everyone has bad days or feels depressed about something are you then disqualified? folks you have to use common sense.
Which "well organized militia" do you belong to?
I don't belong to any militia which one do you belong too? BUT i have the right to if I choose to just as you do and like the right to free speech which I am using right now I choose to keep the right to bear arms you may not care and that is your right .
P. S. that was really a dumb question...... because it has nothing to do with gun control it is just another attempt to bait someone into a argument which I won't do...
No, it wasn't a dumb question because the second amendment clearly uses the words "a well regulated militia". And you are a proud gun owner who believes in the second amendment. Apparently you forgot that part.
_______________________________________________________________________
Wrong again dumba$$.
The Supreme Court has ruled, many times, that the Constitution's 2nd Amendment ensures an individuals right to bear and keep arms.
But of course as all Supreme Court rulings are part of the public record because you have repeatedly proven your are too stupid to look it up.
Wrong again. The question wasn't intended for you because I knew that you would miss the point of it. Two adults were having a discussion. We didn't need the input of a misanthropic Burger King burger flipper.
_______________________________________________________________________
This site provides a PM system for a private discussion.
the W/P is open to anyone and everyone.Freedom of Speech will not be curtailed by the liberals.
Wrong again. Free speech is not covered in privately owned web sites like this. The owners of this site have the right to ban anyone they wish for any reason they wish. Try to remember that. Free speech applies in public areas. I can't go into your home or the Burger King you work at and say whatever I want. I can be asked to leave.
Freedom of Speech will not be curtailed by the liberals.
Freedom of Speech will not be curtailed by the liberals.
What the hell does that mean? Are you scared of liberals? Sure seems like it. You spend a lot of time worrying about them.
BTW, how is that landslide 2014 election working out for you? What have the GOP done to improve the country? 😛
Freedom of Speech will not be curtailed by the liberals.
What the hell does that mean? Are you scared of liberals? Sure seems like it. You spend a lot of time worrying about them.
BTW, how is that landslide 2014 election working out for you? What have the GOP done to improve the country? 😛
Freedom of Speech will not be curtailed by the liberals.
What the hell does that mean? Are you scared of liberals? Sure seems like it. You spend a lot of time worrying about them.
BTW, how is that landslide 2014 election working out for you? What have the GOP done to improve the country? 😛
__________________________________________________________________________
Reading comprehension just ain't your thing son.
So where is that FBI link? 😛
________________________________________________________________________
I don't do research for anyone too incompetent or stupid to do basic data mining.
I proved my numbers with stats from Chicago - and there are many more sites with the same official numbers....
You don't read research either - I searched the FBI website and stats - and they don't exist for 2015 - so prove it with a link or STFU...............
