Ok, many of you probably won't agree (I don't agree with it all), but I found this interesting to listen to.
Why can't we cover economic topics with this level of reality in our debates? We keep dancing around the issues and never discuss it honestly.
Long, but enjoyable...
How about a discussion of Fantasy Football?
It would seem that in CNBC’s debate ostensibly on economic issues Fantasy Football rises to such a level it is appropriate for a Presidential Debate.
How about a discussion of Fantasy Football?
It would seem that in CNBC’s debate ostensibly on economic issues Fantasy Football rises to such a level it is appropriate for a Presidential Debate.
Unregulated gambling with a possibility of fraud which happened to occur the week of the debate?
Yeah, why should the republiclowns have to discuss current events?
How about a discussion of Fantasy Football?
It would seem that in CNBC’s debate ostensibly on economic issues Fantasy Football rises to such a level it is appropriate for a Presidential Debate.Unregulated gambling with a possibility of fraud which happened to occur the week of the debate?
Yeah, why should the republiclowns have to discuss current events?
__________________________________________________________________________
Pretty much because CNBC promised to conduct the debate on economic issues facing the country.
Or did you miss that dumba$$?
This subject should be near and dear to you. The better the economy gets the more assurances you have that you can continue to live off other people's paychecks.
