“Leftists”, “the right”......how silly. Each side has good and bad people, obviously.
No, just the left. Ask around.
There are no bad people on the right, or no good people?
That's right folks, none of this is really happening!
There are theoretical physicists who would back you up on this.
That's right folks, none of this is really happening!
There are theoretical physicists who would back you up on this.
Not just them conspiracy theorists too. And they would be right unless they are left or wrong (same thing).
If I disagree with your opinion, that's not being intolerant. Intolerance is if I had no desire to hear whatever your opinion is in the first place.
Matter of opinion. One can certainly be "Intolerant" of an opinion, once they have heard it.
"Antifa" is a collective of black bloc anarchists with no real organization beyond very small pockets of the population
How do we know what or who they are when they all wear masks?
So, hey, if all liberals/leftists are intolerant anarchists, all rightists/conservatives are hate-filled racists. I can roll with that.
Whatever floats your boat!
If I disagree with your opinion, that's not being intolerant. Intolerance is if I had no desire to hear whatever your opinion is in the first place.
Matter of opinion. One can certainly be "Intolerant" of an opinion, once they have heard it.
"Antifa" is a collective of black bloc anarchists with no real organization beyond very small pockets of the population
How do we know what or who they are when they all wear masks?
So, hey, if all liberals/leftists are intolerant anarchists, all rightists/conservatives are hate-filled racists. I can roll with that.
Whatever floats your boat!
BigV, what is your definition of "intolerance"?
“Leftists”, “the right”......how silly. Each side has good and bad people, obviously.
No, just the left. Ask around.
There are no bad people on the right, or no good people?
Not really a matter of bad or good people. However, I have no desire to get to know anyone who hates me for my political or social beliefs. Was once that naive, never again.
Since this last presidential election, it appears that people have withdrawn into their bubbles more, and I think that's a good thing.
Don't despair, brother! Count your blessings or your blessings won't count!
And the cat fight continues!
Clinton fires back at Brazile ‘rigged’ claims: ‘That just wasn’t the case’
11/09/17 09:12 AM EST
Hillary Clinton on Wednesday dismissed claims made by former Democratic National Committee interim Chairwoman Donna Brazile about the party’s presidential primary, saying the way she described the contest “just wasn’t the case.”
“I didn’t know what she was referring to because, as has now come out, that just wasn’t the case,” Clinton said during an appearance on NBC’s “Late Night with Seth Meyers.”
“But the current DNC leadership really invested heavily in Virginia and New Jersey and other places.”
Clinton’s comments come after Brazile stirred controversy last week when an excerpt from her new book appeared to suggest that the Democratic primary was rigged in Clinton’s favor.
Brazile cited a fundraising agreement between the Clinton campaign, Clinton’s joint fundraising committee and the DNC that said the campaign would “control the party’s finances, strategy, and all the money raised.” The agreement, according to Brazile, was signed in August of 2015, nearly a year before Clinton secured the nomination.
“The funding arrangement with [Hillary for America] and the victory fund agreement was not illegal, but it sure looked unethical,” Brazile wrote in the excerpt published in Politico.
“If the fight had been fair, one campaign would not have control of the party before the voters had decided which one they wanted to lead. This was not a criminal act, but as I saw it, it compromised the party’s integrity.”
Former Clinton staff members pushed back on Brazile’s revelations last week, saying they “do not recognize the campaign she portrays in the book."
But the former interim DNC chairwoman appeared to backtrack on her claims Sunday, telling ABC’s “This Week” that she does not believe the party’s primary was rigged.
“I found no evidence, none, whatsoever,” Brazile told George Stephanopoulos on “This Week" when asked about accusations that the primary process was rigged in Clinton's favor.
“The only thing I found, which I said, I found the cancer, but I’m not killing the patient, was this memorandum that prevented the DNC from running its own operation.”
Wasn’t this already posted?
Wasn’t this already posted?
The reports of the Democrats circular firing squad are daily and numerous.
Try to keep up son.
Wasn’t this already posted?
The reports of the Democrats circular firing squad are daily and numerous.
Try to keep up son.
It would probably help some people to read it twice anyway.
Wasn’t this already posted?
The reports of the Democrats circular firing squad are daily and numerous.
Try to keep up son.
How many Republicans in Congress are not running for re-election? I have lost count.
Wasn’t this already posted?
The reports of the Democrats circular firing squad are daily and numerous.
Try to keep up son.How many Republicans in Congress are not running for re-election? I have lost count.
Some of those WILL run again, as Democrats. You can have them!
Donald Trump to cowardly to fight ( 5 deferments) to fat to run. 😮 😮
![]()
😛 😛
Would you like to rephrase that?
Trump received 4 one year deferments for college, same as many other students, like me.
(1968) Went in for his physical exam, as we all did when classified 1-A, and received first a DiSQ classification (means disqualified for service) a 1-Y classification was later issued (call up only in war or national emergency) due to bone spurs in both feet. You could get the same classification if you had flat feet.
Trump gets re-classified 1-A when he graduates, gets a draft lottery number of 356 out of 365 (higher number means less likely to be drafted).
Physical results change 1-A to 4-F classification (not qualified for service).
So, he went in for his physicals and got disqualified. What's your problem with that?
Donald Trump to cowardly to fight ( 5 deferments) to fat to run. 😮 😮
![]()
😛 😛
Would you like to rephrase that?
Trump received 4 one year deferments for college, same as many other students, like me.(1968) Went in for his physical exam, as we all did when classified 1-A, and received first a DiSQ classification (means disqualified for service) a 1-Y classification was later issued (call up only in war or national emergency) due to bone spurs in both feet. You could get the same classification if you had flat feet.
Trump gets re-classified 1-A when he graduates, gets a draft lottery number of 356 out of 365 (higher number means less likely to be drafted).
Physical results change 1-A to 4-F classification (not qualified for service).
So, he went in for his physicals and got disqualified. What's your problem with that?
Daddy was rich, he was a coward, he didn't have to go.
Or had "influential friends" like Bill Clinton did...lol
After stating on TV that the Democratic Party Primary was rigged, Fauxcahontas tries to lie her way out:
Warren backpedals twice after calling Democratic primaries 'rigged'
By Alex Griswold | Washington Free Beacon
Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren (Mass.) backtracked Wednesday after previously saying the 2016 Democratic presidential primaries were "rigged."
Warren told MassLive.com on Wednesday that she believes the allegations in former acting Democratic National Committee chair Donna Brazile's new book, but said while the allegations showed "bias" in Hillary Clinton's favor, the primaries did not rise to the level of being "rigged."
"While there was some bias at the DNC, the overall 2016 primary process was fair and Hillary made history," she said.
A week earlier, the senator was asked by CNN's Jake Tapper whether she agreed with Brazile's allegation that the process was "rigged" in Clinton's favor. "Yes," she answered simply.
Later that same day, Warren was asked on PBS' "NewsHour" if the DNC's actions meant "the election was rigged."
Good to see anyone in politics attempting to be honest about the US political process.
Good to see anyone in politics attempting to be honest about the US political process.
Absolutely.....And to think Bernie may well have been elected our president had he been the nominee. I repeat, the data shows he was way ahead of little Donnie pre and post election.
As Bill Maher suggested last night, Bernie should run again.....And I agree.
[Edited on 11/12/2017 by Chain]
American judges are liars, so is the FBI and CIA, comey, mueller, our meda...all liars. We must stand with Putin and clear his name. Putin speaks the truth, not the American officials. Long live Trump! #maga #4moreyears.
Good to see anyone in politics attempting to be honest about the US political process.
Absolutely.....And to think Bernie may well have been elected our president had he been the nominee. I repeat, the data shows he was way ahead of little Donnie pre and post election.
As Bill Maher suggested last night, Bernie should run again.....And I agree.
Yea, right.
The NYT printed, just days before election day, that Hillary Clinton had a 93% to Donald Trump's 7%.And you suckers believed them!
The DNC and the Hillary Clinton Campaign were corrupt and a fraud.
And lost.[Edited on 11/12/2017 by Chain]
Good to see anyone in politics attempting to be honest about the US political process.
Absolutely.....And to think Bernie may well have been elected our president had he been the nominee. I repeat, the data shows he was way ahead of little Donnie pre and post election.
As Bill Maher suggested last night, Bernie should run again.....And I agree.
Yea, right.
The NYT printed, just days before election day, that Hillary Clinton had a 93% to Donald Trump's 7%.And you suckers believed them!
The DNC and the Hillary Clinton Campaign were corrupt and a fraud.
And lost.[Edited on 11/12/2017 by Chain]
Are you just making shit up now? Oh wait, you are always making shit up.
Good to see anyone in politics attempting to be honest about the US political process.
Absolutely.....And to think Bernie may well have been elected our president had he been the nominee. I repeat, the data shows he was way ahead of little Donnie pre and post election.
As Bill Maher suggested last night, Bernie should run again.....And I agree.
Yea, right.
The NYT printed, just days before election day, that Hillary Clinton had a 93% to Donald Trump's 7%.And you suckers believed them!
The DNC and the Hillary Clinton Campaign were corrupt and a fraud.
And lost.[Edited on 11/12/2017 by Chain]
Are you just making shit up now? Oh wait, you are always making shit up.
I see you are still in capable of sourcing factual information.
That does of course affirm your low-info voter status.
Brazile says she found DNC deep in debt from Obama, controlled by Clinton a year before nomination
By Dave Boyer - The Washington Times - Thursday, November 2, 2017
Former Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Donna Brazile says President Obama decimated the party’s finances to win re-election in 2012 and that Hillary Clinton’s campaign took control of the DNC long before she defeated Sen. Bernard Sanders for the party’s presidential nomination last year.
In revelations from her upcoming book that are roiling an increasingly divided Democratic Party, Ms. Brazile said she was shocked at the sorry condition of the DNC’s finances when she took over in July 2016 for embattled Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who she said was “not a good manager.”
Ms. Brazile described a phone call she had with Gary Gensler, the chief financial officer of Mrs. Clinton’s campaign, on the morning after the Democratic National Convention ended in late July 2016.
“He told me the Democratic Party was broke and $2 million in debt,” Ms. Brazile wrote. “‘What?’ I screamed. ‘I am an officer of the party and they’ve been telling us everything is fine and they were raising money with no problems.’ That wasn’t true, he said.”
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/nov/2/brazile-says-obama-left-dnc-deep-debt-clinton-camp/
Good to see anyone in politics attempting to be honest about the US political process.
Absolutely.....And to think Bernie may well have been elected our president had he been the nominee. I repeat, the data shows he was way ahead of little Donnie pre and post election.
As Bill Maher suggested last night, Bernie should run again.....And I agree.
Yea, right.
The NYT printed, just days before election day, that Hillary Clinton had a 93% to Donald Trump's 7%.And you suckers believed them!
The DNC and the Hillary Clinton Campaign were corrupt and a fraud.
And lost.[Edited on 11/12/2017 by Chain]
Are you just making shit up now? Oh wait, you are always making shit up.
I see you are still in capable of sourcing factual information.
That does of course affirm your low-info voter status.
No, you have no source for your claims. Would you like me to post a link to something that doesn't exist? Show your source or shut up.
Good to see anyone in politics attempting to be honest about the US political process.
Absolutely.....And to think Bernie may well have been elected our president had he been the nominee. I repeat, the data shows he was way ahead of little Donnie pre and post election.
As Bill Maher suggested last night, Bernie should run again.....And I agree.
Yea, right.
The NYT printed, just days before election day, that Hillary Clinton had a 93% to Donald Trump's 7%.And you suckers believed them!
The DNC and the Hillary Clinton Campaign were corrupt and a fraud.
And lost.[Edited on 11/12/2017 by Chain]
Are you just making shit up now? Oh wait, you are always making shit up.
I see you are still in capable of sourcing factual information.
That does of course affirm your low-info voter status.No, you have no source for your claims. Would you like me to post a link to something that doesn't exist? Show your source or shut up.
the DNC and Hillary Clinton corruption and fraud has been widely reported in the legitimate media.
Apparently you are wholly owned by fake news and the corrupt liberal media.
After suffering embarrassing losses in the 2016 Election, The DNC was in search of a new chairman. The early leader was Keith Ellison because he spews hate much to the liking of the Democrat Party elites. However, those same Democrat Party elites also knew that their DNC was broke so they chose Tom Perez because of his “fund-raising prowess” or that was what they thought.
The National Republican Party, from January 2017 through September 2017, has out raised the DNC by more than 2 to 1 and the DNC is still deeply in debt.
DNC enters 2018 in cash panic
Party officials face a daunting rebuilding effort and worries about the committee's cash flow after years of atrophy.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/22/dnc-2018-rebuilding-finances-244019
Good to see anyone in politics attempting to be honest about the US political process.
Absolutely.....And to think Bernie may well have been elected our president had he been the nominee. I repeat, the data shows he was way ahead of little Donnie pre and post election.
As Bill Maher suggested last night, Bernie should run again.....And I agree.
Yea, right.
The NYT printed, just days before election day, that Hillary Clinton had a 93% to Donald Trump's 7%.And you suckers believed them!
The DNC and the Hillary Clinton Campaign were corrupt and a fraud.
And lost.[Edited on 11/12/2017 by Chain]
Are you just making shit up now? Oh wait, you are always making shit up.
I see you are still in capable of sourcing factual information.
That does of course affirm your low-info voter status.No, you have no source for your claims. Would you like me to post a link to something that doesn't exist? Show your source or shut up.
the DNC and Hillary Clinton corruption and fraud has been widely reported in the legitimate media.
Apparently you are wholly owned by fake news and the corrupt liberal media.
So you have no source. You just made up some lies. Got it.
Good to see anyone in politics attempting to be honest about the US political process.
Absolutely.....And to think Bernie may well have been elected our president had he been the nominee. I repeat, the data shows he was way ahead of little Donnie pre and post election.
As Bill Maher suggested last night, Bernie should run again.....And I agree.
Yea, right.
The NYT printed, just days before election day, that Hillary Clinton had a 93% to Donald Trump's 7%.And you suckers believed them!
The DNC and the Hillary Clinton Campaign were corrupt and a fraud.
And lost.[Edited on 11/12/2017 by Chain]
Are you just making shit up now? Oh wait, you are always making shit up.
I see you are still in capable of sourcing factual information.
That does of course affirm your low-info voter status.No, you have no source for your claims. Would you like me to post a link to something that doesn't exist? Show your source or shut up.
the DNC and Hillary Clinton corruption and fraud has been widely reported in the legitimate media.
Apparently you are wholly owned by fake news and the corrupt liberal media.So you have no source. You just made up some lies. Got it.
Some things never change.
Good to see anyone in politics attempting to be honest about the US political process.
Absolutely.....And to think Bernie may well have been elected our president had he been the nominee. I repeat, the data shows he was way ahead of little Donnie pre and post election.
As Bill Maher suggested last night, Bernie should run again.....And I agree.
Yea, right.
The NYT printed, just days before election day, that Hillary Clinton had a 93% to Donald Trump's 7%.And you suckers believed them!
The DNC and the Hillary Clinton Campaign were corrupt and a fraud.
And lost.[Edited on 11/12/2017 by Chain]
Are you just making shit up now? Oh wait, you are always making shit up.
I see you are still in capable of sourcing factual information.
That does of course affirm your low-info voter status.No, you have no source for your claims. Would you like me to post a link to something that doesn't exist? Show your source or shut up.
the DNC and Hillary Clinton corruption and fraud has been widely reported in the legitimate media.
Apparently you are wholly owned by fake news and the corrupt liberal media.So you have no source. You just made up some lies. Got it.
The links were posted.
Do you know how to click on a link and read?
You posted fake news Mule. You keep falling for it. You have no proof, only fake news links.
- 75 Forums
- 15.1 K Topics
- 193 K Posts
- 20 Online
- 24.9 K Members