A Clinton campaign group has put the media on notice, warning them not to
use certain words and phrases in describing Ms. Clinton...http://news.investors.com/blogs-capital-hill/032615-745260-clinton-supports-play-the-sexism-card.htm
I read it and I'm all riled up now!!!
Unexpected trash piece on investors.com. I guess in their blog section anyone can write about whatever.
Not trying to rile anyone up. I think it's amusing, myself.
A Clinton campaign group has put the media on notice, warning them not to
use certain words and phrases in describing Ms. Clinton...http://news.investors.com/blogs-capital-hill/032615-745260-clinton-supports-play-the-sexism-card.htm
I read it and I'm all riled up now!!!
Unexpected trash piece on investors.com. I guess in their blog section anyone can write about whatever.
Not trying to rile anyone up. I think it's amusing, myself.
No, you liked it because you felt you could take another shot at Hillary. Swing and a miss. 
I cannot believe a politician would do such a thing. Crazy.
A politician didn't. It was a a misguided Facebook Group of Clinton "supporters."
Wasn't that obvious to begin with? I mean, really.
Hillary will be out denouncing this action next couple of days.
Hillary will be out denouncing this action next couple of days.
Wanna bet? it would be dumb for her to even acknowledge it.
Hillary Milhous Clinton. Has a ring to it.
She's wiped her whole email server clean now. Spiked everything! All of it!!
That paper trail is GONE. Wonder why she made that decision.
Who cares. This is a non-story. It doesn't mean anything. Politicians do much worse on a daily basis. Stop reaching so soon....there will be real issues to criticize one day if she gets elected.
Who cares. This is a non-story. It doesn't mean anything. Politicians do much worse on a daily basis. Stop reaching so soon....there will be real issues to criticize one day if she gets elected.
It's probably a point of view matter. If you believe Freedom of Information, accountability, transparency and the like are important...it's an issue. If you fall into the camp that feels those things are nothing special, probably won't blow your skirt up.
This isn't Hillary's first adventure with bad document retention skills, but in this case Skittish St. and Evasive Ave. lead straight to the Clinton Foundation. I'd bet on it.
What's with the Associated Press, continuing to report on this fake scandal? Why can't everybody just leave Hillary alone about it? She's not hiding anything!
Do your arms hurt yet for reaching so far for so long? Let it go. Nobody cares about this, except media outlets who need content and need to sell papers. Save your criticisms for something important...otherwise you'll just be the boy who cried wolf.
Hilllary's lies, stonewalling, obfuscation, and contradictions are what's extending it. As long as it's being reported it should be permitted to discuss, so pardon me all over the place.
This election will come down to a relative handful of voters in a few swing States. As a Hillary-backer you better hope nobody cares about it. There could very well be enough of them that believe we should move past the Clintons and sliminess that comes along with them.
"sliminess"? If you are expecting a politician to come along one day who doesn't engage in "slimy" behavior, I have a few products I'd like to sell you.
"sliminess"? If you are expecting a politician to come along one day who doesn't engage in "slimy" behavior, I have a few products I'd like to sell you.
Many have been forced to resign or have received jail time for it. This one is running for President. Swell.
"sliminess"? If you are expecting a politician to come along one day who doesn't engage in "slimy" behavior, I have a few products I'd like to sell you.
Your cynicsm is remarkable. But what's weird about it is that instead of being down on everybody you seem to have accepted it and don't care.
"sliminess"? If you are expecting a politician to come along one day who doesn't engage in "slimy" behavior, I have a few products I'd like to sell you.
Your cynicsm is remarkable. But what's weird about it is that instead of being down on everybody you seem to have accepted it and don't care.
Actually, IMO, it reflects the extreme polarization of an arena completely devoid of humility. No one does anything wrong anymore, because there's always an opposite incident to be found to neutralize it. It's the very worst part of left vs. right tribalism.
Hilllary's lies, stonewalling, obfuscation, and contradictions are what's extending it. As long as it's being reported it should be permitted to discuss, so pardon me all over the place.
This election will come down to a relative handful of voters in a few swing States. As a Hillary-backer you better hope nobody cares about it. There could very well be enough of them that believe we should move past the Clintons and sliminess that comes along with them.
He makes a perfect point Alloak nobody cares about this except the media, barely, and the GOP and some of their more fervent followers. Based on the lack of news it seems even the GOP realizes it is time to move onto looking for new skeletons in Hillary's closet.
Whether you like it or not this is a non issue. Much ado about nothing IMHO.
Hilllary's lies, stonewalling, obfuscation, and contradictions are what's extending it. As long as it's being reported it should be permitted to discuss, so pardon me all over the place.
This election will come down to a relative handful of voters in a few swing States. As a Hillary-backer you better hope nobody cares about it. There could very well be enough of them that believe we should move past the Clintons and sliminess that comes along with them.
He makes a perfect point Alloak nobody cares about this except the media, barely, and the GOP and some of their more fervent followers. Based on the lack of news it seems even the GOP realizes it is time to move onto looking for new skeletons in Hillary's closet.
Whether you like it or not this is a non issue. Much ado about nothing IMHO.
Yes, if it was Dick Cheney destroying government documents it would be nothing, right? Doubt it.
When you are under investigation and destroy more evidence I hope they decide it's "much ado about nothing."
Besides that, why the lies, contradictions, much less the destruction of all those documents? You don't ask yourself why? Her past is littered with similar misconduct. Is this really Presidential material in your mind? I KNOW we can do better.
Hilllary's lies, stonewalling, obfuscation, and contradictions are what's extending it. As long as it's being reported it should be permitted to discuss, so pardon me all over the place.
This election will come down to a relative handful of voters in a few swing States. As a Hillary-backer you better hope nobody cares about it. There could very well be enough of them that believe we should move past the Clintons and sliminess that comes along with them.
He makes a perfect point Alloak nobody cares about this except the media, barely, and the GOP and some of their more fervent followers. Based on the lack of news it seems even the GOP realizes it is time to move onto looking for new skeletons in Hillary's closet.
Whether you like it or not this is a non issue. Much ado about nothing IMHO.
Yes, if it was Dick Cheney destroying government documents it would be nothing, right? Doubt it.
When you are under investigation and destroy more evidence I hope they decide it's "much ado about nothing."
Besides that, why the lies, contradictions, much less the destruction of all those documents? You don't ask yourself why? Her past is littered with similar misconduct. Is this really Presidential material in your mind? I KNOW we can do better.
It hasn't been proven she destroyed Government documents Alloak.
In any case whether we like it or not there probably is not a politician who is pure as the driven snow so unfortunately we end up dealing with those who are running at the time.
In fact IMHO the politicians on both sides of the aisle who have cleaner hands and are moderate most likely would never get the support to even have a shot at running for President.
I know our system is broken but it is what it is.
One could have only wished that the worst thing Cheney did was destroy documents. Email-gate = bridge-gate.....poorly planned, poorly executed, over-reaching, fake scandal, manufactured by the opposing side.
In all seriousness. It's in the best interest of both sides to ignore petty stories about the opposition. It truly is a "boy who cried wolf" scenario. What happens down the road when he/she does something truly immoral? If every word and action is criticized along the way, how can you place an emphasis on a true evil act?
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"sliminess"? If you are expecting a politician to come along one day who doesn't engage in "slimy" behavior, I have a few products I'd like to sell you.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Your cynicsm is remarkable. But what's weird about it is that instead of being down on everybody you seem to have accepted it and don't care.
So the better option is to be down on everybody all the time? Sorry, but that sounds exhausting and unpleasant. I'm just accepting the realities of our world. More importantly, what sense does it make to criticize someone for something the everyone else does? Not saying that it makes it right, but it doesn't differentiate the target from being worse than anyone else. It only makes sense to criticize someone for something unique. Basing your opposition over things like, "He/she lied", "He/she is a hypocrite", "he/she is arrogant", is meaningless. You can say those things about everyone.
One could have only wished that the worst thing Cheney did was destroy documents. Email-gate = bridge-gate.....poorly planned, poorly executed, over-reaching, fake scandal, manufactured by the opposing side.
What? The GOP didn't manufacture this. Valerie Jarrett leaked the story to the NYT and they took off with it.
I stand corrected. But the point remains....the fake outrage is so transparent. Who in their right mind has time in their day to be truly upset that some politicians in NJ caused a traffic jam, or deleted emails?
Serious question....what do you believe is the worst thing she wrote or received in those emails?
I stand corrected. But the point remains....the fake outrage is so transparent. Who in their right mind has time in their day to be truly upset that some politicians in NJ caused a traffic jam, or deleted emails?
Serious question....what do you believe is the worst thing she wrote or received in those emails?
Whatever it is would get her into more trouble than deleting them has. Either that, or she's just stupid to make the decisions that she has, which I doubt. These are all unforced errors. I would guess it has to do with money and the Clinton Foundation. That's just a guess.
I stand corrected. But the point remains....the fake outrage is so transparent. Who in their right mind has time in their day to be truly upset that some politicians in NJ caused a traffic jam, or deleted emails?
Serious question....what do you believe is the worst thing she wrote or received in those emails?
Whatever it is would get her into more trouble than deleting them has. Either that, or she's just stupid to make the decisions that she has, which I doubt. These are all unforced errors. I would guess it has to do with money and the Clinton Foundation. That's just a guess.
What's stupid is all the speculation & opinions. Point us to something factual, and it would increase your credibility. Using your sense of logic, I could guess it has something to do with a bet on the Super Bowl. That guess is no better nor any worse than your guess. Guessing is like trying to pick the winning lottery numbers - practically no chance of being accurate.
I stand corrected. But the point remains....the fake outrage is so transparent. Who in their right mind has time in their day to be truly upset that some politicians in NJ caused a traffic jam, or deleted emails?
Serious question....what do you believe is the worst thing she wrote or received in those emails?
Whatever it is would get her into more trouble than deleting them has. Either that, or she's just stupid to make the decisions that she has, which I doubt. These are all unforced errors. I would guess it has to do with money and the Clinton Foundation. That's just a guess.
What's stupid is all the speculation & opinions. Point us to something factual, and it would increase your credibility. Using your sense of logic, I could guess it has something to do with a bet on the Super Bowl. That guess is no better nor any worse than your guess. Guessing is like trying to pick the winning lottery numbers - practically no chance of being accurate.
This is a fake scandal being pursued by a fake cable news channel and is being argued here by a fake conservative who likes to fake outrage at all things on the left.
Yes, if it was Dick Cheney destroying government documents it would be nothing, right? Doubt it.
Remember that fire in Cheney's office? The one that started in a closet and burned up his files? That murderous reptile was covering up his reprehensible dealings. He had a fire that just burned up his documents. Where was the outrage?
[Edited on 4/2/2015 by BillyBlastoff]
I stand corrected. But the point remains....the fake outrage is so transparent. Who in their right mind has time in their day to be truly upset that some politicians in NJ caused a traffic jam, or deleted emails?
Serious question....what do you believe is the worst thing she wrote or received in those emails?
Whatever it is would get her into more trouble than deleting them has. Either that, or she's just stupid to make the decisions that she has, which I doubt. These are all unforced errors. I would guess it has to do with money and the Clinton Foundation. That's just a guess.
What's stupid is all the speculation & opinions. Point us to something factual, and it would increase your credibility. Using your sense of logic, I could guess it has something to do with a bet on the Super Bowl. That guess is no better nor any worse than your guess. Guessing is like trying to pick the winning lottery numbers - practically no chance of being accurate.
Logic tells me that someone doesn't delete 60,000 documents just for the hell of it. Particularly when media outlets and investigators wanted them released. Maybe she has nothing to hide, maybe she does.. We'll never know now though. The evidence is gone.
This is no big deal to some folks and that's fine, but I disagree. I know one thing for sure, any future high government officer will be able to destroy documents if they feel like it. That won't be any big deal either, right?
Yes, if it was Dick Cheney destroying government documents it would be nothing, right? Doubt it.
Remember that fire in Cheney's office? The one that started in a closet and burned up his files? That murderous reptile was covering up his reprehensible dealings. He had a fire that just burned up his documents. Where was the outrage?
[Edited on 4/2/2015 by BillyBlastoff]
I don't remember that, but if he was found to have anything to do with it he
should go to jail. What the statute of limitations on arson?
[Edited on 4/2/2015 by alloak41]
What's stupid is all the speculation & opinions. Point us to something factual, and it would increase your credibility.
Here's a fact. Every email on her server has been deleted. No big deal, though.
Did my credibility increase any?
