Barack Hatfield v Hillary McCoy
The Daily Mail ? What's next you going to post stories from the National Enquirer? 
So you are stooping to your buddy Mule's tactic posting every negative article you can find?
In any case as I predicted the email scandal went nowhere and had no impact on Hillary's popularity.
Poor Conservatives here are desperate knowing there will be another Democrat in the White House for another 8 years?
Barack Hatfield v Hillary McCoy
The Daily Mail ? What's next you going to post stories from the National Enquirer?
So you are stooping to your buddy Mule's tactic posting every negative article you can find?
In any case as I predicted the email scandal went nowhere and had no impact on Hillary's popularity.
Poor Conservatives here are desperate knowing there will be another Democrat in the White House for another 8 years?
_______________________________________________________________________
Hillary’s popularity has dropped 16 points since The New York Times broke her email scandal and criminal activity.
BTW – The GOP had nothing to do with this issue but will pursue the illegal acts by Hillary.
Her self-inflicted scandal is exactly that, self-inflicted.
The country doesn't need another liar-in- chief. The one we have has already done enough damage.
Everybody is out to get poor Hillary. The GOP, the AP, the NYT, the Obamas. Evil plots all around her.
Everybody is out to get poor Hillary. The GOP, the AP, the NYT, the Obamas. Evil plots all around her.
Yet I predict if she runs, she will win over the GOP and dominate with the women vote, alloak.
Everybody is out to get poor Hillary. The GOP, the AP, the NYT, the Obamas. Evil plots all around her.
Nah. Not everybody. She is still ahead in the polls despite what you and muleboy like to believe.
16 points and falling since her latest scandal broke.
Democrats are racing to get somebody else to run.
Yea, it that vast right wing conspiracy again.
That same vast right wing conspiracy Hillary's claimed was behind her husband's conviction for lying under oath and adultery.
16 points and falling since her latest scandal broke.
Democrats are racing to get somebody else to run.Yea, it that vast right wing conspiracy again.
That same vast right wing conspiracy Hillary's claimed was behind her husband's conviction for lying under oath and adultery.
Research is hard.
http://www.politico.com/p/polls/person/latest/hillary-clinton#.VQ2tR_nF-So ]
16 points and falling since her latest scandal broke.
Democrats are racing to get somebody else to run.Yea, it that vast right wing conspiracy again.
That same vast right wing conspiracy Hillary's claimed was behind her husband's conviction for lying under oath and adultery.Research is hard.
http://www.politico.com/p/polls/person/latest/hillary-clinton#.VQ2tR_nF-So ]
______________________________________________________________________
And falling fast like an Obama policy.
Remember Obama saying his administration would be/is the most “transparent” in history?
He repeated that line many times in the campaign and while in office.
However just as has been his pattern throughout, he lied:
Obama administration sets new record for denying, censoring government files
Published March 18, 2015 - Associated Press
The Obama administration set a new record again for more often than ever censoring government files or outright denying access to them last year under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act, according to a new analysis of federal data by The Associated Press.
The government took longer to turn over files when it provided any, said more regularly that it couldn't find documents, and refused a record number of times to turn over files quickly that might be especially newsworthy.
It also acknowledged in nearly 1 in 3 cases that its initial decisions to withhold or censor records were improper under the law -- but only when it was challenged.
Its backlog of unanswered requests at year's end grew remarkably by 55 percent to more than 200,000. It also cut by 375, or about 9 percent, the number of full-time employees across government paid to look for records. That was the fewest number of employees working on the issue in five years.
The government's new figures, published Tuesday, covered all requests to 100 federal agencies during fiscal 2014 under the Freedom of Information law, which is heralded globally as a model for transparent government. They showed that despite disappointments and failed promises by the White House to make meaningful improvements in the way it releases records, the law was more popular than ever. Citizens, journalists, businesses and others made a record 714,231 requests for information. The U.S. spent a record $434 million trying to keep up. It also spent about $28 million on lawyers' fees to keep records secret.
The government responded to 647,142 requests, a 4 percent decrease over the previous year. It more than ever censored materials it turned over or fully denied access to them, in 250,581 cases or 39 percent of all requests. Sometimes, the government censored only a few words or an employee's phone number, but other times it completely marked out nearly every paragraph on pages.
On 215,584 other occasions, the government said it couldn't find records, a person refused to pay for copies or the government determined the request to be unreasonable or improper.
The White House touted its success under its own analysis. It routinely excludes from its assessment instances when it couldn't find records, a person refused to pay for copies or the request was determined to be improper under the law, and said under this calculation it released all or parts of records in 91 percent of requests -- still a record low since President Barack Obama took office using the White House's own math.
"We actually do have a lot to brag about," White House spokesman Josh Earnest said.
Separately, the Justice Department congratulated the Agriculture and State departments for finishing work on their oldest 10 requests, said the Pentagon responded to nearly all requests within three months and praised the Health and Human Services Department for disclosing information about the Ebola outbreak and immigrant children caught crossing U.S. borders illegally.
The government's responsiveness under the open records law is an important measure of its transparency. Under the law, citizens and foreigners can compel the government to turn over copies of federal records for zero or little cost. Anyone who seeks information through the law is generally supposed to get it unless disclosure would hurt national security, violate personal privacy or expose business secrets or confidential decision-making in certain areas. It cited such exceptions a record 554,969 times last year.
Under the president's instructions, the U.S. should not withhold or censor government files merely because they might be embarrassing, but federal employees last year regularly misapplied the law. In emails that AP obtained from the National Archives and Records Administration about who pays for Michelle Obama's expensive dresses, the agency blacked-out a sentence under part of the law intended to shield personal, private information, such as Social Security numbers, phone numbers or home addresses. But it failed to censor the same passage on a subsequent page.
The sentence: "We live in constant fear of upsetting the WH (White House)."
In nearly 1 in 3 cases, when someone challenged under appeal the administration's initial decision to censor or withhold files, the government reconsidered and acknowledged it was at least partly wrong. That was the highest reversal rate in at least five years.
The AP's chief executive, Gary Pruitt, said the news organization filed hundreds of requests for government files. Records the AP obtained revealed police efforts to restrict airspace to keep away news helicopters during violent street protests in Ferguson, Missouri. In another case, the records showed Veterans Affairs doctors concluding that a gunman who later killed 12 people had no mental health issues despite serious problems and encounters with police during the same period. They also showed the FBI pressuring local police agencies to keep details secret about a telephone surveillance device called Stingray.
"What we discovered reaffirmed what we have seen all too frequently in recent years," Pruitt wrote in a column published this week. "The systems created to give citizens information about their government are badly broken and getting worse all the time."
The U.S. released its new figures during Sunshine Week, when news organizations promote open government and freedom of information.
The AP earlier this month sued the State Department under the law to force the release of email correspondence and government documents from Hillary Rodham Clinton's tenure as secretary of state. The government had failed to turn over the files under repeated requests, including one made five years ago and others pending since the summer of 2013.
The government said the average time it took to answer each records request ranged from one day to more than 2.5 years. More than half of federal agencies took longer to answer requests last year than the previous year.
Journalists and others who need information quickly to report breaking news fared worse than ever.
Under the law, the U.S. is required to move urgent requests from journalists to the front of the line for a speedy answer if records will inform the public concerning an actual or alleged government activity. But the government now routinely denies such requests: Over six years, the number of requests granted speedy processing status fell from nearly half to fewer than 1 in 8. The U.S. reminded agencies in January that it should carefully consider such "breaking news" requests.
The CIA, at the center of so many headlines, has denied every such request the last two years.
Remember Obama saying his administration would be/is the most “transparent” in history?
He repeated that line many times in the campaign and while in office.However just as has been his pattern throughout, he lied:
Obama administration sets new record for denying, censoring government files
Published March 18, 2015 - Associated PressThe Obama administration set a new record again for more often than ever censoring government files or outright denying access to them last year under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act, according to a new analysis of federal data by The Associated Press.
The government took longer to turn over files when it provided any, said more regularly that it couldn't find documents, and refused a record number of times to turn over files quickly that might be especially newsworthy.
It also acknowledged in nearly 1 in 3 cases that its initial decisions to withhold or censor records were improper under the law -- but only when it was challenged.
Its backlog of unanswered requests at year's end grew remarkably by 55 percent to more than 200,000. It also cut by 375, or about 9 percent, the number of full-time employees across government paid to look for records. That was the fewest number of employees working on the issue in five years.
The government's new figures, published Tuesday, covered all requests to 100 federal agencies during fiscal 2014 under the Freedom of Information law, which is heralded globally as a model for transparent government. They showed that despite disappointments and failed promises by the White House to make meaningful improvements in the way it releases records, the law was more popular than ever. Citizens, journalists, businesses and others made a record 714,231 requests for information. The U.S. spent a record $434 million trying to keep up. It also spent about $28 million on lawyers' fees to keep records secret.
The government responded to 647,142 requests, a 4 percent decrease over the previous year. It more than ever censored materials it turned over or fully denied access to them, in 250,581 cases or 39 percent of all requests. Sometimes, the government censored only a few words or an employee's phone number, but other times it completely marked out nearly every paragraph on pages.
On 215,584 other occasions, the government said it couldn't find records, a person refused to pay for copies or the government determined the request to be unreasonable or improper.
The White House touted its success under its own analysis. It routinely excludes from its assessment instances when it couldn't find records, a person refused to pay for copies or the request was determined to be improper under the law, and said under this calculation it released all or parts of records in 91 percent of requests -- still a record low since President Barack Obama took office using the White House's own math.
"We actually do have a lot to brag about," White House spokesman Josh Earnest said.
Separately, the Justice Department congratulated the Agriculture and State departments for finishing work on their oldest 10 requests, said the Pentagon responded to nearly all requests within three months and praised the Health and Human Services Department for disclosing information about the Ebola outbreak and immigrant children caught crossing U.S. borders illegally.The government's responsiveness under the open records law is an important measure of its transparency. Under the law, citizens and foreigners can compel the government to turn over copies of federal records for zero or little cost. Anyone who seeks information through the law is generally supposed to get it unless disclosure would hurt national security, violate personal privacy or expose business secrets or confidential decision-making in certain areas. It cited such exceptions a record 554,969 times last year.
Under the president's instructions, the U.S. should not withhold or censor government files merely because they might be embarrassing, but federal employees last year regularly misapplied the law. In emails that AP obtained from the National Archives and Records Administration about who pays for Michelle Obama's expensive dresses, the agency blacked-out a sentence under part of the law intended to shield personal, private information, such as Social Security numbers, phone numbers or home addresses. But it failed to censor the same passage on a subsequent page.
The sentence: "We live in constant fear of upsetting the WH (White House)."
In nearly 1 in 3 cases, when someone challenged under appeal the administration's initial decision to censor or withhold files, the government reconsidered and acknowledged it was at least partly wrong. That was the highest reversal rate in at least five years.The AP's chief executive, Gary Pruitt, said the news organization filed hundreds of requests for government files. Records the AP obtained revealed police efforts to restrict airspace to keep away news helicopters during violent street protests in Ferguson, Missouri. In another case, the records showed Veterans Affairs doctors concluding that a gunman who later killed 12 people had no mental health issues despite serious problems and encounters with police during the same period. They also showed the FBI pressuring local police agencies to keep details secret about a telephone surveillance device called Stingray.
"What we discovered reaffirmed what we have seen all too frequently in recent years," Pruitt wrote in a column published this week. "The systems created to give citizens information about their government are badly broken and getting worse all the time."
The U.S. released its new figures during Sunshine Week, when news organizations promote open government and freedom of information.
The AP earlier this month sued the State Department under the law to force the release of email correspondence and government documents from Hillary Rodham Clinton's tenure as secretary of state. The government had failed to turn over the files under repeated requests, including one made five years ago and others pending since the summer of 2013.
The government said the average time it took to answer each records request ranged from one day to more than 2.5 years. More than half of federal agencies took longer to answer requests last year than the previous year.Journalists and others who need information quickly to report breaking news fared worse than ever.
Under the law, the U.S. is required to move urgent requests from journalists to the front of the line for a speedy answer if records will inform the public concerning an actual or alleged government activity. But the government now routinely denies such requests: Over six years, the number of requests granted speedy processing status fell from nearly half to fewer than 1 in 8. The U.S. reminded agencies in January that it should carefully consider such "breaking news" requests.
The CIA, at the center of so many headlines, has denied every such request the last two years.
What does this have to do with Hillary Clinton? Aren't you the guy who whines when others go off topic?
16 points and falling since her latest scandal broke.
Democrats are racing to get somebody else to run.Yea, it that vast right wing conspiracy again.
That same vast right wing conspiracy Hillary's claimed was behind her husband's conviction for lying under oath and adultery.Research is hard.
http://www.politico.com/p/polls/person/latest/hillary-clinton#.VQ2tR_nF-So ]
______________________________________________________________________
And falling fast like an Obama policy.
Only in your bizarre world Mule as she has always led by over 40 points for the Democratic nomination and never had as big a lead as you claim in the Presidential race.
Please provide links to support your claim or is it another one of your lies?
The e-mail scandal amounted to nothing just as I predicted. 8 more years of misery for you Mule!
[Edited on 3/21/2015 by Bill_Graham]
16 points and falling since her latest scandal broke.
Democrats are racing to get somebody else to run.Yea, it that vast right wing conspiracy again.
That same vast right wing conspiracy Hillary's claimed was behind her husband's conviction for lying under oath and adultery.Research is hard.
http://www.politico.com/p/polls/person/latest/hillary-clinton#.VQ2tR_nF-So ]
______________________________________________________________________
And falling fast like an Obama policy.
Only in your bizarre world Mule as she has always led by over 40 points for the Democratic nomination and never had as big a lead as you claim in the Presidential race.
Please provide links to support your claim or is it another one of your lies?
_______________________________________________________________________
Gallup had her at 69% until her email scandal broke.
Broken by a liberal newspaper.
Now she is down to 55%.
What part of falling fast do you not understand?
16 points and falling since her latest scandal broke.
Democrats are racing to get somebody else to run.Yea, it that vast right wing conspiracy again.
That same vast right wing conspiracy Hillary's claimed was behind her husband's conviction for lying under oath and adultery.Research is hard.
http://www.politico.com/p/polls/person/latest/hillary-clinton#.VQ2tR_nF-So ]
______________________________________________________________________
And falling fast like an Obama policy.
Only in your bizarre world Mule as she has always led by over 40 points for the Democratic nomination and never had as big a lead as you claim in the Presidential race.
Please provide links to support your claim or is it another one of your lies?
_______________________________________________________________________
Gallup had her at 69% until her email scandal broke.
Broken by a liberal newspaper.Now she is down to 55%.
What part of falling fast do you not understand?
Links please
16 points and falling since her latest scandal broke.
Democrats are racing to get somebody else to run.Yea, it that vast right wing conspiracy again.
That same vast right wing conspiracy Hillary's claimed was behind her husband's conviction for lying under oath and adultery.Research is hard.
http://www.politico.com/p/polls/person/latest/hillary-clinton#.VQ2tR_nF-So ]
______________________________________________________________________
And falling fast like an Obama policy.
Only in your bizarre world Mule as she has always led by over 40 points for the Democratic nomination and never had as big a lead as you claim in the Presidential race.
Please provide links to support your claim or is it another one of your lies?
_______________________________________________________________________
Gallup had her at 69% until her email scandal broke.
Broken by a liberal newspaper.Now she is down to 55%.
What part of falling fast do you not understand?
Links please
What? You want him to do your research for you? Besides, how does one post phantom links?
16 points and falling since her latest scandal broke.
Democrats are racing to get somebody else to run.Yea, it that vast right wing conspiracy again.
That same vast right wing conspiracy Hillary's claimed was behind her husband's conviction for lying under oath and adultery.Research is hard.
http://www.politico.com/p/polls/person/latest/hillary-clinton#.VQ2tR_nF-So ]
______________________________________________________________________
And falling fast like an Obama policy.
Only in your bizarre world Mule as she has always led by over 40 points for the Democratic nomination and never had as big a lead as you claim in the Presidential race.
Please provide links to support your claim or is it another one of your lies?
_______________________________________________________________________
Gallup had her at 69% until her email scandal broke.
Broken by a liberal newspaper.Now she is down to 55%.
What part of falling fast do you not understand?
Links please
_____________________________________________________________________
If you don’t know how to lookup Gallup Poll information you are too stupid to help.
I don’t do the research for those incapable or too lazy to do their own.
That’s a liberal thing. Have the government do it for you.
16 points and falling since her latest scandal broke.
Democrats are racing to get somebody else to run.Yea, it that vast right wing conspiracy again.
That same vast right wing conspiracy Hillary's claimed was behind her husband's conviction for lying under oath and adultery.Research is hard.
http://www.politico.com/p/polls/person/latest/hillary-clinton#.VQ2tR_nF-So ]
______________________________________________________________________
And falling fast like an Obama policy.
Only in your bizarre world Mule as she has always led by over 40 points for the Democratic nomination and never had as big a lead as you claim in the Presidential race.
Please provide links to support your claim or is it another one of your lies?
_______________________________________________________________________
Gallup had her at 69% until her email scandal broke.
Broken by a liberal newspaper.Now she is down to 55%.
What part of falling fast do you not understand?
Links please
_____________________________________________________________________
If you don’t know how to lookup Gallup Poll information you are too stupid to help.
I don’t do the research for those incapable or too lazy to do their own.
That’s a liberal thing. Have the government do it for you.
He knows how to do it. I would think if posting a link would prove you right, you would do it. If you knew how. 😛
16 points and falling since her latest scandal broke.
Democrats are racing to get somebody else to run.Yea, it that vast right wing conspiracy again.
That same vast right wing conspiracy Hillary's claimed was behind her husband's conviction for lying under oath and adultery.Research is hard.
http://www.politico.com/p/polls/person/latest/hillary-clinton#.VQ2tR_nF-So ]
______________________________________________________________________
And falling fast like an Obama policy.
Only in your bizarre world Mule as she has always led by over 40 points for the Democratic nomination and never had as big a lead as you claim in the Presidential race.
Please provide links to support your claim or is it another one of your lies?
_______________________________________________________________________
Gallup had her at 69% until her email scandal broke.
Broken by a liberal newspaper.Now she is down to 55%.
What part of falling fast do you not understand?
Links please
_____________________________________________________________________
If you don’t know how to lookup Gallup Poll information you are too stupid to help.
I don’t do the research for those incapable or too lazy to do their own.
That’s a liberal thing. Have the government do it for you.
Figured as much you have no link so just another one of your made up lies. Typical.
16 points and falling since her latest scandal broke.
Democrats are racing to get somebody else to run.Yea, it that vast right wing conspiracy again.
That same vast right wing conspiracy Hillary's claimed was behind her husband's conviction for lying under oath and adultery.Research is hard.
http://www.politico.com/p/polls/person/latest/hillary-clinton#.VQ2tR_nF-So ]
______________________________________________________________________
And falling fast like an Obama policy.
Only in your bizarre world Mule as she has always led by over 40 points for the Democratic nomination and never had as big a lead as you claim in the Presidential race.
Please provide links to support your claim or is it another one of your lies?
_______________________________________________________________________
Gallup had her at 69% until her email scandal broke.
Broken by a liberal newspaper.Now she is down to 55%.
What part of falling fast do you not understand?
Links please
_____________________________________________________________________
If you don’t know how to lookup Gallup Poll information you are too stupid to help.
I don’t do the research for those incapable or too lazy to do their own.
That’s a liberal thing. Have the government do it for you.Figured as much you have no link so just another one of your made up lies. Typical.
______________________________________________________________
Still can't look up a Gallup poll?
Why is it you can’t state your opinion on the actual treads?
While personal attacks are the liberal’s standard response to having no intellectual argument, it becomes tiresome and reduces you to waste of space.
16 points and falling since her latest scandal broke.
Democrats are racing to get somebody else to run.Yea, it that vast right wing conspiracy again.
That same vast right wing conspiracy Hillary's claimed was behind her husband's conviction for lying under oath and adultery.Research is hard.
http://www.politico.com/p/polls/person/latest/hillary-clinton#.VQ2tR_nF-So ]
______________________________________________________________________
And falling fast like an Obama policy.
Only in your bizarre world Mule as she has always led by over 40 points for the Democratic nomination and never had as big a lead as you claim in the Presidential race.
Please provide links to support your claim or is it another one of your lies?
_______________________________________________________________________
Gallup had her at 69% until her email scandal broke.
Broken by a liberal newspaper.Now she is down to 55%.
What part of falling fast do you not understand?
Links please
_____________________________________________________________________
If you don’t know how to lookup Gallup Poll information you are too stupid to help.
I don’t do the research for those incapable or too lazy to do their own.
That’s a liberal thing. Have the government do it for you.Figured as much you have no link so just another one of your made up lies. Typical.
______________________________________________________________
Still can't look up a Gallup poll?
Why is it you can’t state your opinion on the actual treads?
While personal attacks are the liberal’s standard response to having no intellectual argument, it becomes tiresome and reduces you to waste of space.
You are nothing but a series of personal attacks. And your Gallup data is wrong.
I'll pay all of you to let this thread die.
I'll pay all of you to let this thread die.
How about you let the Patriots thread die and we will call it even. deal? 😛
[Edited on 3/22/2015 by Bill_Graham]
I'll pay all of you to let this thread die.
And yet, you post in it.
I'll pay all of you to let this thread die.
And yet, you post in it.
fine, starting now. what do you suggest I should've done? start another thread? PM the same half dozen or so guys going 'round and 'round in circles until every political thread turns into a pissing contest day after day?
besides, I'm the one doing the paying...
and NO, Mr. Graham 
I will NOT let the Pats thread die.
I guess we're stuck with two unappealing (depending on how you look at it) threads.
I'll pay all of you to let this thread die.
And yet, you post in it.
fine, starting now. what do you suggest I should've done? start another thread? PM the same half dozen or so guys going 'round and 'round in circles until every political thread turns into a pissing contest day after day?
besides, I'm the one doing the paying...
and NO, Mr. Graham
I guess we're stuck with two unappealing (depending on how you look at it) threads.
Too bad as I thought you were getting the better of the deal.
I'll pay all of you to let this thread die.
And yet, you post in it.
fine, starting now. what do you suggest I should've done? start another thread? PM the same half dozen or so guys going 'round and 'round in circles until every political thread turns into a pissing contest day after day?
besides, I'm the one doing the paying...
and NO, Mr. Graham
I guess we're stuck with two unappealing (depending on how you look at it) threads.
Too bad as I thought you were getting the better of the deal.
LOL! Nice try...
I'll pay all of you to let this thread die.
Pretty sure this thread will be going strong for another 6 years. It will probably die out shortly after her reelection for her second term.
A Clinton campaign group has put the media on notice, warning them not to
use certain words and phrases in describing Ms. Clinton...
http://news.investors.com/blogs-capital-hill/032615-745260-clinton-supports-play-the-sexism-card.htm
I cannot believe a politician would do such a thing. Crazy.
A Clinton campaign group has put the media on notice, warning them not to
use certain words and phrases in describing Ms. Clinton...http://news.investors.com/blogs-capital-hill/032615-745260-clinton-supports-play-the-sexism-card.htm
"A Clinton campaign group"
What does that even mean? And why should anyone care what such a group says/does? I'm sure the NY Times reporter who says that she received an email from them doesn't, other than to ridicule them (which it sounds like they deserve for being polarizing, calculating, disingenuous, insincere, ambitious, entitled, overconfident, and not to mention secretive).
I cannot believe a politician would do such a thing. Crazy.
A politician didn't. It was a a misguided Facebook Group of Clinton "supporters."
