Just think this woman could have been one stroke away from being the President of the United States.

I really hope she does run long enough to participate in the GOP debates as it will be comedic gold

[Edited on 2/8/2015 by Bill_Graham]

Hillary and Warren are better candidates then anything the GOP has to offer. Just the fact that you and the other conservatives are afraid to even propose a possible GOP presidential candidate pretty much proves that.

Possible GOP candidates have been mentioned, but whether they have or haven't doesn't prove anything.

You and the other conservatives seem afraid to take a position on any of the GOP candidates which says to me you have little confidence in any of them.

I've mentioned Carson perhaps a dozen times or more on these threads going back months. I would love to see him either at the top of the ticket or as a VP candidate.

Shaking in my boots here.

Hillary and Warren are better candidates then anything the GOP has to offer. Just the fact that you and the other conservatives are afraid to even propose a possible GOP presidential candidate pretty much proves that.

Possible GOP candidates have been mentioned, but whether they have or haven't doesn't prove anything.

You and the other conservatives seem afraid to take a position on any of the GOP candidates which says to me you have little confidence in any of them.

I've mentioned Carson perhaps a dozen times or more on these threads going back months. I would love to see him either at the top of the ticket or as a VP candidate.

Shaking in my boots here.

Fair enough Alloak, so what about him makes you think he is a good candidate and can beat Hillary?

Hillary and Warren are better candidates then anything the GOP has to offer. Just the fact that you and the other conservatives are afraid to even propose a possible GOP presidential candidate pretty much proves that.

Possible GOP candidates have been mentioned, but whether they have or haven't doesn't prove anything.

You and the other conservatives seem afraid to take a position on any of the GOP candidates which says to me you have little confidence in any of them.

I've mentioned Carson perhaps a dozen times or more on these threads going back months. I would love to see him either at the top of the ticket or as a VP candidate.

Shaking in my boots here.

it'll never happen

I will say I respect Carson in that he says what is on his mind and does not worry about being politically correct but that is most likely the very thing that will sink his chances. He says some pretty crazy stuff sometimes.

I am looking forward to hearing what the other GOP candidate, like Jeb Bush, have to say. I always found Rand Paul interesting as half the time I like what he has to say while the other half he just sounds batsh*t crazy

Hillary and Warren are better candidates then anything the GOP has to offer. Just the fact that you and the other conservatives are afraid to even propose a possible GOP presidential candidate pretty much proves that.

Possible GOP candidates have been mentioned, but whether they have or haven't doesn't prove anything.

You and the other conservatives seem afraid to take a position on any of the GOP candidates which says to me you have little confidence in any of them.

I've mentioned Carson perhaps a dozen times or more on these threads going back months. I would love to see him either at the top of the ticket or as a VP candidate.

Shaking in my boots here.

Fair enough Alloak, so what about him makes you think he is a good candidate and can beat Hillary?

Real world common sense coupled with superior intellect and his approach to problem solving.

Hillary and Warren are better candidates then anything the GOP has to offer. Just the fact that you and the other conservatives are afraid to even propose a possible GOP presidential candidate pretty much proves that.

Possible GOP candidates have been mentioned, but whether they have or haven't doesn't prove anything.

You and the other conservatives seem afraid to take a position on any of the GOP candidates which says to me you have little confidence in any of them.

I've mentioned Carson perhaps a dozen times or more on these threads going back months. I would love to see him either at the top of the ticket or as a VP candidate.

Shaking in my boots here.

Fair enough Alloak, so what about him makes you think he is a good candidate and can beat Hillary?

Real world common sense coupled with superior intellect and his approach to problem solving.

Very generic statement, what are his ideas to solve our national current challenges that make him a superior candidate in your opinion?

Hillary and Warren are better candidates then anything the GOP has to offer. Just the fact that you and the other conservatives are afraid to even propose a possible GOP presidential candidate pretty much proves that.

Possible GOP candidates have been mentioned, but whether they have or haven't doesn't prove anything.

You and the other conservatives seem afraid to take a position on any of the GOP candidates which says to me you have little confidence in any of them.

I've mentioned Carson perhaps a dozen times or more on these threads going back months. I would love to see him either at the top of the ticket or as a VP candidate.

Shaking in my boots here.

Fair enough Alloak, so what about him makes you think he is a good candidate and can beat Hillary?

Real world common sense coupled with superior intellect and his approach to problem solving.

Very generic statement, what are his ideas to solve our national current challenges that make him a superior candidate in your opinion?

There is no question that Dr. Carson is a very intelligent man. So, how can conservatives support a candidate with no political experience after attacking Obama for his perceived lack of experience?

Hillary and Warren are better candidates then anything the GOP has to offer. Just the fact that you and the other conservatives are afraid to even propose a possible GOP presidential candidate pretty much proves that.

Possible GOP candidates have been mentioned, but whether they have or haven't doesn't prove anything.

You and the other conservatives seem afraid to take a position on any of the GOP candidates which says to me you have little confidence in any of them.

I've mentioned Carson perhaps a dozen times or more on these threads going back months. I would love to see him either at the top of the ticket or as a VP candidate.

Shaking in my boots here.

Fair enough Alloak, so what about him makes you think he is a good candidate and can beat Hillary?

Real world common sense coupled with superior intellect and his approach to problem solving.

Very generic statement, what are his ideas to solve our national current challenges that make him a superior candidate in your opinion?

There is no question that Dr. Carson is a very intelligent man. So, how can conservatives support a candidate with no political experience after attacking Obama for his perceived lack of experience?

C'mon, keller.

It's because...because he's not Obama and that's the only reason. None of Carson's supposed admirers is going to be able to delineate that one for you. Good question.

The Republicans have a deep bench of Governors all quite qualified to be President. Walker, Bush, Perry, Jindal and Kasich are all capable and have the executive level management experience in both the private and public sectors. Each has strong and responsible fiscal records. Combined with their compelling ethical and moral standards make them excellent candidates should they decide to run.

The trouble comes in the general election. The Democrats have no candidates with the qualifications necessary to be President. Outside of global warming and entitlements neither Hillary nor Warren has a position on anything. Both of the Democrats biggest money candidates’ official position is that they have no position.
But if, as the last time, the left-wing news media run a celebrity, political ideology based trash daily the opposition campaign the country could end up with a second inexperienced, ineffective President in a row.
I don’t think the American people are that stupid.

If you’re wondering, I support Dr. Carson for Sec. of HHS. His expertise in the medical field, both as a surgeon and senior administrator will be sorely needed to fix the travesty of obamacare. He is also too nice of a guy to survive a Presidential election.

There are no declared candidates for The Presidency in either party and there is a very good reason for that.
Anyone care to guess why?

Now this is really getting good:

Secretary of State John Kerry said in an interview broadcast on Sunday that he has not ruled out a 2016 White House bid, which would put him in a wide-open Democrat primary field behind front-runner Hillary Clinton.

Who gave this thread CPR?

Now this is really getting good:

Secretary of State John Kerry said in an interview broadcast on Sunday that he has not ruled out a 2016 White House bid, which would put him in a wide-open Democrat primary field behind front-runner Hillary Clinton.

LOL yeah sure it is wide open. Hillary shows more then 50% in all the polls and in most case over 60% support to date and her nearest competitor has less than 20% and it is wide open and you expect Kerry to somehow zoom up the polls if he decides to run?

http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/2016-national-democratic-primary

You never cease to amaze Mule.

The GOP on the other hand does not seem to have a clear cut candidate so far with no candidate even topping 20% in the polls. Jeb (the smart son) Bush holds a slim lead and based on what I read may just be too liberal for the hard core conservatives.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/jeb-bush-narrow-lead-nh-2016-rivals-poll-article-1.2107437

Like I said I can't wait for the GOP debates this election as they should be comedic gold.

[Edited on 2/9/2015 by Bill_Graham]

The issue of gay marriage has changed a lot in the last several years and it becomes legal in more and more states as the general public becomes more accepting of the LBGT community. The far right, meanwhile, shows no interest in accepting anything LGBT-related and even calls gay marriage “The most insidious and aggressive assault to our religious freedom that we’ve ever seen." Really????? Wow.

Mike Huckabee And Other GOP A-Listers Appear In Hilariously Over-The-Top Anti-Gay Film
“When evil is called good, darkness is ushered into the land. And with the darkness comes a threat to our freedoms,” the narrator grimly intones as bare branches tremble beneath a cold, spectral moon.

The source of this unspeakable evil? Gays, of course. Right Wing Watch reports Faith 2 Action’s Janet Porter has just released the preview for her anti-gay film, which she claims is a “documentary” and has turgidly titled: “Light Wins: How To Overcome The Criminalization Of Christianity.”

In the preview for this anti-gay film , the pastor, former Arkansas governor and ever-present GOP presidential wannabe Mike Huckabee declares — presumably in reference to all those anti-gay marriage “Christian” wedding cake bakers out there:

“What kind of freedom of speech do we have, if a person who expresses a biblical viewpoint about marriage is told they can’t open their business in a location?”

It doesn’t matter than no one ever told any anti-gay business owners they can’t open their business somewhere, because it feels like the truth. Meanwhile, Huckabee’s fellow “Christian” pastors decry gay rights and marriage equality as “the blatant hostility to the Christian faith,” and insist that it’s an assault on their religious freedom.

“The most insidious and aggressive assault to our religious freedom that we’ve ever seen. That is the cultural clash of our time.”

Meanwhile, another anti-gay pastor fumes:

“Homosexual activists get everything they want. Nothing less than criminalization of Christianity.”

Apparently, these so-called “Christians” define “religious freedom” as the right to act like a bunch of mean, bullying, anti-gay bigots. Because, for them, “rights” and “freedoms” are a zero-sum game in which you can only gain rights and freedoms by taking them away from others.

And just as you thought this anti-gay film couldn’t possibly get more melodramatic, here comes Porter stalking through the dark and scary woods of evil bearing a lantern-of-truth, because apparently, her Christian God thinks flashlights are too gay.

“I’m Janet Porter. I was in the dark about the radical agenda to silence the truth. But after years of research and observation, there is no longer any doubt. As I wrote in ‘the Criminalization of Christianity,’ if they can silence the truth, they will silence the gospel.”

Here’s the video:

That’s right, Porter and the “Christian” pastors and GOP lawmakers who appear in her anti-gay film claim that we’re “criminalizing” the Christian religion and persecuting God-fearing Christians.

How? By refusing to honor “Christian” business owners their God-given right to discriminate against gays; by challenging the tax exempt status of so-called “Christian” Churches that practice hate speech and involve themselves in anti-gay politics; and by questioning “Christian” parents’ and communities’ so-called “right” to abuse and bully their LGBT children, often to the point of suicide.

Scheduled to premier at the National Religious Broadcaster’s Convention on Feb. 23-26 in Nashville, TN, the cast for this creepy, melodramatic, and hilariously over-the-top anti-gay video extravaganza reads like a gathering of evangelical and GOP A-listers, including:

Rep. Steve King (R-IA), Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ), Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX), Rep. Tim Huelskamp (R-KS), Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), Mike Huckabee (pastor and past governor of Arkansas), David Barton (Wallbuilders), James Dobson (Focus on the Family founder), Phyllis Schlafly (founder of the Eagle forum), Scott Lively (scary pastor), and Brian Camenker (president of the anti-gay MassResistance).

And of course, there are plenty of B- and C-listers too. The preview shows these anti-gay luminaries and semi-luminaries attempting to scare the crap out of God-fearing Americans.

And who the heck IS Porter anyway? Right Wing Watch reports that Porter used to have a popular radio show on VCY America’s Christian Radio network until her Dominionist theology got too over-the-top (even for them), and they pulled her off the air back in 2010.

Hillary and Warren are better candidates then anything the GOP has to offer. Just the fact that you and the other conservatives are afraid to even propose a possible GOP presidential candidate pretty much proves that.

Possible GOP candidates have been mentioned, but whether they have or haven't doesn't prove anything.

You and the other conservatives seem afraid to take a position on any of the GOP candidates which says to me you have little confidence in any of them.

I've mentioned Carson perhaps a dozen times or more on these threads going back months. I would love to see him either at the top of the ticket or as a VP candidate.

Shaking in my boots here.

Fair enough Alloak, so what about him makes you think he is a good candidate and can beat Hillary?

Real world common sense coupled with superior intellect and his approach to problem solving.

Very generic statement, what are his ideas to solve our national current challenges that make him a superior candidate in your opinion?

There is no question that Dr. Carson is a very intelligent man. So, how can conservatives support a candidate with no political experience after attacking Obama for his perceived lack of experience?

C'mon, keller.

It's because...because he's not Obama and that's the only reason. None of Carson's supposed admirers is going to be able to delineate that one for you. Good question.

I don't think you can compare the two. They have a totally different set of accomplishments prior to entering politics. Start by asking yourself this. Who do you think is more qualified to address problems with the health care system, a lawyer or a neurosurgeon?

Hillary and Warren are better candidates then anything the GOP has to offer. Just the fact that you and the other conservatives are afraid to even propose a possible GOP presidential candidate pretty much proves that.

Possible GOP candidates have been mentioned, but whether they have or haven't doesn't prove anything.

You and the other conservatives seem afraid to take a position on any of the GOP candidates which says to me you have little confidence in any of them.

I've mentioned Carson perhaps a dozen times or more on these threads going back months. I would love to see him either at the top of the ticket or as a VP candidate.

Shaking in my boots here.

Fair enough Alloak, so what about him makes you think he is a good candidate and can beat Hillary?

Real world common sense coupled with superior intellect and his approach to problem solving.

Very generic statement, what are his ideas to solve our national current challenges that make him a superior candidate in your opinion?

There is no question that Dr. Carson is a very intelligent man. So, how can conservatives support a candidate with no political experience after attacking Obama for his perceived lack of experience?

C'mon, keller.

It's because...because he's not Obama and that's the only reason. None of Carson's supposed admirers is going to be able to delineate that one for you. Good question.

I don't think you can compare the two. They have a totally different set of accomplishments prior to entering politics. Start by asking yourself this. Who do you think is more qualified to address problems with the health care system, a lawyer or a neurosurgeon?

And please tell us what political experience Carson has had that makes him qualified to run for President? Obama was a Civil Rights attorney, taught constitutional law, served 3 terms in the Illinois senate and was a U.S. senator.

I don't think either by themselves is qualified to address the health care issues in the U.S. Do you really think most doctors have a clue how the insurance maze works? They hire people to handle this for them.

I don't think you can compare the two. They have a totally different set of accomplishments prior to entering politics. Start by asking yourself this. Who do you think is more qualified to address problems with the health care system, a lawyer or a neurosurgeon?

How much public service experience does Carson have?

As for your question, the answer is unquestionably a lawyer since the system is the law itself that we are talking about, and no amount of actual brain surgery will address that.

I hope to God the person operating on my brain is focused on improving his skills and keeping up with advances in medicine, not the administration of health insurance.

The Affordable Care Act has nothing to do with the study of medicine.

Hillary and Warren are better candidates then anything the GOP has to offer. Just the fact that you and the other conservatives are afraid to even propose a possible GOP presidential candidate pretty much proves that.

Possible GOP candidates have been mentioned, but whether they have or haven't doesn't prove anything.

You and the other conservatives seem afraid to take a position on any of the GOP candidates which says to me you have little confidence in any of them.

I've mentioned Carson perhaps a dozen times or more on these threads going back months. I would love to see him either at the top of the ticket or as a VP candidate.

Shaking in my boots here.

Fair enough Alloak, so what about him makes you think he is a good candidate and can beat Hillary?

Real world common sense coupled with superior intellect and his approach to problem solving.

Very generic statement, what are his ideas to solve our national current challenges that make him a superior candidate in your opinion?

There is no question that Dr. Carson is a very intelligent man. So, how can conservatives support a candidate with no political experience after attacking Obama for his perceived lack of experience?

C'mon, keller.

It's because...because he's not Obama and that's the only reason. None of Carson's supposed admirers is going to be able to delineate that one for you. Good question.

I don't think you can compare the two. They have a totally different set of accomplishments prior to entering politics. Start by asking yourself this. Who do you think is more qualified to address problems with the health care system, a lawyer or a neurosurgeon?

And please tell us what political experience Carson has had that makes him qualified to run for President? Obama was a Civil Rights attorney, taught constitutional law, served 3 terms in the Illinois senate and was a U.S. senator.

That's part of his appeal for many of us. A non-politician might be just what the Doctor ordered.

I hope to God the person operating on my brain is focused on improving his skills and keeping up with advances in medicine, not the administration of health insurance.

The Affordable Care Act has nothing to do with the study of medicine.

Dr. Carson's alternative to the ACA...

Hillary and Warren are better candidates then anything the GOP has to offer. Just the fact that you and the other conservatives are afraid to even propose a possible GOP presidential candidate pretty much proves that.

Possible GOP candidates have been mentioned, but whether they have or haven't doesn't prove anything.

You and the other conservatives seem afraid to take a position on any of the GOP candidates which says to me you have little confidence in any of them.

I've mentioned Carson perhaps a dozen times or more on these threads going back months. I would love to see him either at the top of the ticket or as a VP candidate.

Shaking in my boots here.

Fair enough Alloak, so what about him makes you think he is a good candidate and can beat Hillary?

Real world common sense coupled with superior intellect and his approach to problem solving.

Very generic statement, what are his ideas to solve our national current challenges that make him a superior candidate in your opinion?

There is no question that Dr. Carson is a very intelligent man. So, how can conservatives support a candidate with no political experience after attacking Obama for his perceived lack of experience?

C'mon, keller.

It's because...because he's not Obama and that's the only reason. None of Carson's supposed admirers is going to be able to delineate that one for you. Good question.

I don't think you can compare the two. They have a totally different set of accomplishments prior to entering politics. Start by asking yourself this. Who do you think is more qualified to address problems with the health care system, a lawyer or a neurosurgeon?

And please tell us what political experience Carson has had that makes him qualified to run for President? Obama was a Civil Rights attorney, taught constitutional law, served 3 terms in the Illinois senate and was a U.S. senator.

That's part of his appeal for many of us. A non-politician might be just what the Doctor ordered.

But it doesn't change the fact that Obama was attacked for having no experience, but Carson has less than Obama. Now you are saying that is appealing? That makes no sense whatsoever.

I hope to God the person operating on my brain is focused on improving his skills and keeping up with advances in medicine, not the administration of health insurance.

The Affordable Care Act has nothing to do with the study of medicine.

Dr. Carson's alternative to the ACA...

>

<

So the government gives every man, woman and child $2000 to go into a health savings account. Because everyone now has $2000, that can be transferred from one family member to another, basic health insurance costs will plummet?

I don't see how he is reaching that conclusion. I certainly don't see $2000 a year covering my basic health costs. The out of pocket costs for my wife and I last year were more than $3000.

I didn't get a plan from that presentation Alloak. Can you explain it so I better understand the actual plan?

That's part of his appeal for many of us. A non-politician might be just what the Doctor ordered.

But it doesn't change the fact that Obama was attacked for having no experience, but Carson has less than Obama. Now you are saying that is appealing? That makes no sense whatsoever.

I can't answer for what other Conservatives criticized Obama for, I can only answer for myself.

But again, I don't think you can compare the two men. They came from entirely different backgrounds and have completely different experience and accomplishments prior to entering politics.

Even if one wishes to make a comparison, the lack of experience criticism obviously made no difference, so I don't understand the significance of your argument or the point you're trying to make.

Elections are about comparing people.

Elections are about comparing people.

People on the same ballot, true.

Isn't that why you started this thread? To compare potential candidates to Hillary?

Its a long way to Nov. 2016...

Democratic operative, Media Matters founder Brock resigns from pro-Clinton super PAC Priorities USA Action

Published February 09, 2015 – Politico

Democratic operative David Brock reportedly resigned Monday from the board of the super PAC Priorities USA Action, a move that appears to show cracks in the financial power base created to help Hillary Clinton become president in 2016.

The resignation by Brock, who founded the liberal group Media Matters, was reported first by Politico.

Brock is accusing Priorities officials of helping plant a recent story in The New York Times that questions the fundraising practices of his pro-Clinton groups, American Bridge and Media Matters, and the super PAC Ready for Hillary, according to his resignation letter obtained by Politico.

Media Matters principle financier George Soros has been pushing for the liberal PACs to support Elizabeth Warren.

The Times story in part points out that veteran fundraiser Mary Pat Bonner gets a 12.5 percent commission for money raised for Brock’s groups and a smaller percentage for Ready for Hillary.

Clinton has not said yet whether she will seek the Democratic nomination and the presidency next year.

Its a long way to Nov. 2016...

Democratic operative, Media Matters founder Brock resigns from pro-Clinton super PAC Priorities USA Action

Published February 09, 2015 – Politico

Democratic operative David Brock reportedly resigned Monday from the board of the super PAC Priorities USA Action, a move that appears to show cracks in the financial power base created to help Hillary Clinton become president in 2016.

The resignation by Brock, who founded the liberal group Media Matters, was reported first by Politico.

Brock is accusing Priorities officials of helping plant a recent story in The New York Times that questions the fundraising practices of his pro-Clinton groups, American Bridge and Media Matters, and the super PAC Ready for Hillary, according to his resignation letter obtained by Politico.

Media Matters principle financier George Soros has been pushing for the liberal PACs to support Elizabeth Warren.

The Times story in part points out that veteran fundraiser Mary Pat Bonner gets a 12.5 percent commission for money raised for Brock’s groups and a smaller percentage for Ready for Hillary.

Clinton has not said yet whether she will seek the Democratic nomination and the presidency next year.

Keep wishing upon that star mule. Hillary has 60% of the vote with her nearest challenger less than 20% in recent polls and an early poll shows she would crush early GOP leader Jeb Bush if the election was held today.

I can smell your fear.

Its a long way to Nov. 2016...

Democratic operative, Media Matters founder Brock resigns from pro-Clinton super PAC Priorities USA Action

Published February 09, 2015 – Politico

Democratic operative David Brock reportedly resigned Monday from the board of the super PAC Priorities USA Action, a move that appears to show cracks in the financial power base created to help Hillary Clinton become president in 2016.

The resignation by Brock, who founded the liberal group Media Matters, was reported first by Politico.

Brock is accusing Priorities officials of helping plant a recent story in The New York Times that questions the fundraising practices of his pro-Clinton groups, American Bridge and Media Matters, and the super PAC Ready for Hillary, according to his resignation letter obtained by Politico.

Media Matters principle financier George Soros has been pushing for the liberal PACs to support Elizabeth Warren.

The Times story in part points out that veteran fundraiser Mary Pat Bonner gets a 12.5 percent commission for money raised for Brock’s groups and a smaller percentage for Ready for Hillary.

Clinton has not said yet whether she will seek the Democratic nomination and the presidency next year.

Keep wishing upon that star mule. Hillary has 60% of the vote with her nearest challenger less than 20% in recent polls and an early poll shows she would crush early GOP leader Jeb Bush if the election was held today.

I can smell your fear.

___________________________________________________________

60% of a vote that doesn't happen for another 20 months?

Lying to prop up you political ideology is pathetic. Typical but pathetic.

That's part of his appeal for many of us. A non-politician might be just what the Doctor ordered.

But it doesn't change the fact that Obama was attacked for having no experience, but Carson has less than Obama. Now you are saying that is appealing? That makes no sense whatsoever.

I can't answer for what other Conservatives criticized Obama for, I can only answer for myself.

But again, I don't think you can compare the two men. They came from entirely different backgrounds and have completely different experience and accomplishments prior to entering politics.

Even if one wishes to make a comparison, the lack of experience criticism obviously made no difference, so I don't understand the significance of your argument or the point you're trying to make.

I wasn't comparing the two men per se. I was pointing out that conservatives have constantly ridiculed Obama for his lack of experience. Will they do the same if Cain somehow got the nomination?

Its a long way to Nov. 2016...

Democratic operative, Media Matters founder Brock resigns from pro-Clinton super PAC Priorities USA Action

Published February 09, 2015 – Politico

Democratic operative David Brock reportedly resigned Monday from the board of the super PAC Priorities USA Action, a move that appears to show cracks in the financial power base created to help Hillary Clinton become president in 2016.

The resignation by Brock, who founded the liberal group Media Matters, was reported first by Politico.

Brock is accusing Priorities officials of helping plant a recent story in The New York Times that questions the fundraising practices of his pro-Clinton groups, American Bridge and Media Matters, and the super PAC Ready for Hillary, according to his resignation letter obtained by Politico.

Media Matters principle financier George Soros has been pushing for the liberal PACs to support Elizabeth Warren.

The Times story in part points out that veteran fundraiser Mary Pat Bonner gets a 12.5 percent commission for money raised for Brock’s groups and a smaller percentage for Ready for Hillary.

Clinton has not said yet whether she will seek the Democratic nomination and the presidency next year.

Keep wishing upon that star mule. Hillary has 60% of the vote with her nearest challenger less than 20% in recent polls and an early poll shows she would crush early GOP leader Jeb Bush if the election was held today.

I can smell your fear.

___________________________________________________________

60% of a vote that doesn't happen for another 20 months?

Lying to prop up you political ideology is pathetic. Typical but pathetic.

Right and her standings in the polls have not changed or slumped since you started your dreams that she was losing support. You can wish all you want mule unless she has a major health issue Hillary is not going away. She is your worst nightmare.