Hillary Clinton has blood clots in her head. But, maybe the doctors that diagnosed that problem are also committing LIBEL.
Tell me another one.
She had a blood clot 2 years ago, which she was successfully treated for. There is no reason to think she still "has blood clots in her head."
Tell us another one.
Hillary Clinton has blood clots in her head. But, maybe the doctors that diagnosed that problem are also committing LIBEL.
Tell me another one.
She had a blood clot 2 years ago, which she was successfully treated for. There is no reason to think she still "has blood clots in her head."
Tell us another one.
First he says that he was doing this so we would lower ourselves to his level. Then he doubles down by repeating the idiotic blood clot bs. You are right, he is nothing but a troll.
Hillary Clinton has blood clots in her head. But, maybe the doctors that diagnosed that problem are also committing LIBEL.
Tell me another one.
She had a blood clot 2 years ago, which she was successfully treated for. There is no reason to think she still "has blood clots in her head."
Tell us another one.
First he says that he was doing this so we would lower ourselves to his level. Then he doubles down by repeating the idiotic blood clot bs. You are right, he is nothing but a troll.
Alloak might troll at times but he is no dummy and makes some excellent points sometimes. JMO but I think he just likes to pull our chains at times and see how wound up he get everyone.
Hillary Clinton has blood clots in her head. But, maybe the doctors that diagnosed that problem are also committing LIBEL.
Tell me another one.
She had a blood clot 2 years ago, which she was successfully treated for. There is no reason to think she still "has blood clots in her head."
Tell us another one.
First he says that he was doing this so we would lower ourselves to his level. Then he doubles down by repeating the idiotic blood clot bs. You are right, he is nothing but a troll.
N
Alloak might troll at times but he is no dummy and makes some excellent points sometimes. JMO but I think he just likes to pull our chains at times and see how wound up he get everyone.
I
He started this thread on 10/9 and has been repeating his claims about Hillary's health since. He has been called on to back this up. He can't, so he just keeps on going. He does stuff like this often and when he finally gets completely shot down, he says he was joking. 3 weeks of posting the same lies isn't joking, it is trolling.
[Edited on 10/31/2014 by jkeller]
Hillary Clinton has blood clots in her head. But, maybe the doctors that diagnosed that problem are also committing LIBEL.
Tell me another one.
She had a blood clot 2 years ago, which she was successfully treated for. There is no reason to think she still "has blood clots in her head."
Tell us another one.
First he says that he was doing this so we would lower ourselves to his level. Then he doubles down by repeating the idiotic blood clot bs. You are right, he is nothing but a troll.
N
Alloak might troll at times but he is no dummy and makes some excellent points sometimes. JMO but I think he just likes to pull our chains at times and see how wound up he get everyone.
I
He started this thread on 10/9 and has been repeating his claims about Hillary's health since. He has been called on to back this up. He can't, so he just keeps on going. He does stuff like this often and when he finally gets completely shot down, he says he was joking. 3 weeks of posting the same lies isn't joking, it is trolling.
[Edited on 10/31/2014 by jkeller]
I understand but did you ever think he keeps it up to see how long he can get you all to respond to him?
Also I am speculating he knows it is forgone conclusion that Hillary is going to run and win if healthy, even if he is in denial, so his only hope is if she really has a serious health issue which keeps her from running.
Now that Christie is slowly self combusting with his public temper tantrums the conservatives must really worried they have just about no chance to win in 2016.
Hillary Clinton has blood clots in her head. But, maybe the doctors that diagnosed that problem are also committing LIBEL.
Tell me another one.
She had a blood clot 2 years ago, which she was successfully treated for. There is no reason to think she still "has blood clots in her head."
Tell us another one.
N
First he says that he was doing this so we would lower ourselves to his level. Then he doubles down by repeating the idiotic blood clot bs. You are right, he is nothing but a troll.
N
Alloak might troll at times but he is no dummy and makes some excellent points sometimes. JMO but I think he just likes to pull our chains at times and see how wound up he get everyone.
I
He started this thread on 10/9 and has been repeating his claims about Hillary's health since. He has been called on to back this up. He can't, so he just keeps on going. He does stuff like this often and when he finally gets completely shot down, he says he was joking. 3 weeks of posting the same lies isn't joking, it is trolling.
[Edited on 10/31/2014 by jkeller]
I understand but did you ever think he keeps it up to see how long he can get you all to respond to him?
Also I am speculating he knows it is forgone conclusion that Hillary is going to run and win if healthy, even if he is in denial, so his only hope is if she really has a serious health issue which keeps her from running.
Now that Christie is slowly self combusting with his public temper tantrums the conservatives must really worried they have just about no chance to win in 2016.
I'm done with talking about Alloak. There will be a strong candidate from the Republicans in 2016 because they will do everything possible to avoid having the same "boys club" candidates they have had in the last two elections. It is their only shot at winning and I believe they know it.
Hillary Clinton has blood clots in her head. But, maybe the doctors that diagnosed that problem are also committing LIBEL.
Tell me another one.
She had a blood clot 2 years ago, which she was successfully treated for. There is no reason to think she still "has blood clots in her head."
Tell us another one.
N
First he says that he was doing this so we would lower ourselves to his level. Then he doubles down by repeating the idiotic blood clot bs. You are right, he is nothing but a troll.
N
Alloak might troll at times but he is no dummy and makes some excellent points sometimes. JMO but I think he just likes to pull our chains at times and see how wound up he get everyone.
I
He started this thread on 10/9 and has been repeating his claims about Hillary's health since. He has been called on to back this up. He can't, so he just keeps on going. He does stuff like this often and when he finally gets completely shot down, he says he was joking. 3 weeks of posting the same lies isn't joking, it is trolling.
[Edited on 10/31/2014 by jkeller]
I understand but did you ever think he keeps it up to see how long he can get you all to respond to him?
Also I am speculating he knows it is forgone conclusion that Hillary is going to run and win if healthy, even if he is in denial, so his only hope is if she really has a serious health issue which keeps her from running.
Now that Christie is slowly self combusting with his public temper tantrums the conservatives must really worried they have just about no chance to win in 2016.
I'm done with talking about Alloak. There will be a strong candidate from the Republicans in 2016 because they will do everything possible to avoid having the same "boys club" candidates they have had in the last two elections. It is their only shot at winning and I believe they know it.
Knowing it and doing something about it are two different things. That would be like trying to push on a string.
So that might disqualify someone like Jeb Bush because he is a bit too practical and wouldn't appeal to the red meat faction of the party?
I've even heard rumblings last week or so about Mitt throwing his hat into the mix again. He's another nonstarter?
Ah...instead they would go on Cruz control or find salvage in a Rick Perry type? Now we're talking about far right appeal. The appeal to the voting population as whole...doubtful, but that matters less than base appeal.
Me...I hope we get Cruz because the entertainment value would be off the charts.
[Edited on 11/1/2014 by MartinD28]
No, calling her an alcoholic was outrageous. Inventing health problems was outrageous.
Is Hillary Clinton a relative of yours?... Is she family?
If not, what do you care?
Man, your guess is as good as mine. The devotion towards certain politicians is nothing short of amazing, like some sort of religious fanaticism. Maybe some folks get themselves too emotionally invested in people like Clinton and Obama. Say something they don't like about a politician and it's taken personally. I don't get it, but that's the way she rolls.
No, calling her an alcoholic was outrageous. Inventing health problems was outrageous.
Is Hillary Clinton a relative of yours?... Is she family?
If not, what do you care?
Man, your guess is as good as mine. The devotion towards certain politicians is nothing short of amazing, like some sort of religious fanaticism. Maybe some folks get themselves too emotionally invested in people like Clinton and Obama. Say something they don't like about a politician and it's taken personally. I don't get it, but that's the way she rolls.
Laughable - your line on religious fanaticism. Isn't your conservative GOP party the party that is comprised of religious fanatics? Look at all political issues they commingle with politics & drape themselves in - all in the cause of supposed religious ideology.
What you don't get even though others have tried to tell you is that you libeled Mrs. Clinton in labeling her an alcoholic. How wrong can you be? That's pretty low even for this site. There is no emotional investment in Hillary as you theorize in a warped sense. I'm guessing you are proud of your disgusting characterization. I believe I asked you previously if you are a doctor or a counselor and have diagnosed her? Of course you didn't respond, because you make up stuff & then try to explain yourself away as this was some sort of experiment. Do you enjoy digging yourself into deeper & deeper holes? It certainly appears so. How sad.
Hillary Clinton has blood clots in her head. But, maybe the doctors that diagnosed that problem are also committing LIBEL.
Tell me another one.
She had a blood clot 2 years ago, which she was successfully treated for. There is no reason to think she still "has blood clots in her head."
Tell us another one.
First he says that he was doing this so we would lower ourselves to his level. Then he doubles down by repeating the idiotic blood clot bs. You are right, he is nothing but a troll.
Alloak might troll at times but he is no dummy and makes some excellent points sometimes. JMO but I think he just likes to pull our chains at times and see how wound up he get everyone.
Sometimes I try to pull chains, I admit it. But it can be done without singling people out or attacking other people here personally. I try never to do that. If it ever starts getting to that point, it's time to go.
No, calling her an alcoholic was outrageous. Inventing health problems was outrageous.
Is Hillary Clinton a relative of yours?... Is she family?
If not, what do you care?
Man, your guess is as good as mine. The devotion towards certain politicians is nothing short of amazing, like some sort of religious fanaticism. Maybe some folks get themselves too emotionally invested in people like Clinton and Obama. Say something they don't like about a politician and it's taken personally. I don't get it, but that's the way she rolls.
Laughable - your line on religious fanaticism. Isn't your conservative GOP party the party that is comprised of religious fanatics? Look at all political issues they commingle with politics & drape themselves in - all in the cause of supposed religious ideology.
What you don't get even though others have tried to tell you is that you libeled Mrs. Clinton in labeling her an alcoholic. How wrong can you be? That's pretty low even for this site. There is no emotional investment in Hillary as you theorize in a warped sense. I'm guessing you are proud of your disgusting characterization. I believe I asked you previously if you are a doctor or a counselor and have diagnosed her? Of course you didn't respond, because you make up stuff & then try to explain yourself away as this was some sort of experiment. Do you enjoy digging yourself into deeper & deeper holes? It certainly appears so. How sad.
Hillary Clinton is a public figure. Good luck with Libel. Aside from that, there's NOTHING wrong with calling her (anything) in the context of discussing political tactics in a hypothetical manner on a music website.
Following along with the dialogue on a thread and seeing the context develop seems to be a lost art.
As for her health problems, I firmly believe they are more serious than anyone is letting on.
I don't believe there's a conspiracy among doctors to fabricate them.
No, calling her an alcoholic was outrageous. Inventing health problems was outrageous.
Is Hillary Clinton a relative of yours?... Is she family?
If not, what do you care?
Man, your guess is as good as mine. The devotion towards certain politicians is nothing short of amazing, like some sort of religious fanaticism. Maybe some folks get themselves too emotionally invested in people like Clinton and Obama. Say something they don't like about a politician and it's taken personally. I don't get it, but that's the way she rolls.
Laughable - your line on religious fanaticism. Isn't your conservative GOP party the party that is comprised of religious fanatics? Look at all political issues they commingle with politics & drape themselves in - all in the cause of supposed religious ideology.
What you don't get even though others have tried to tell you is that you libeled Mrs. Clinton in labeling her an alcoholic. How wrong can you be? That's pretty low even for this site. There is no emotional investment in Hillary as you theorize in a warped sense. I'm guessing you are proud of your disgusting characterization. I believe I asked you previously if you are a doctor or a counselor and have diagnosed her? Of course you didn't respond, because you make up stuff & then try to explain yourself away as this was some sort of experiment. Do you enjoy digging yourself into deeper & deeper holes? It certainly appears so. How sad.
Hillary Clinton is a public figure. Good luck with Libel. Aside from that, there's NOTHING wrong with calling her (anything) in the context of discussing political tactics in a hypothetical manner on a music website.
Following along with the dialogue on a thread and seeing the context develop seems to be a lost art.
As for her health problems, I firmly believe they are more serious than anyone is letting on.
I don't believe there's a conspiracy among doctors to fabricate them.
Something we agree on Alloak. You can say anything you want about Hillary as it has zero impact on her life or chance of winning the Presidency one way or another.
I mean we liberals have said mean things about Bush, that he is dumb, or Dick Cheney , that he is war criminal, etc.
But the big difference is what we say is true. 😛
Let's say __________ wins the Presidency again for the Democrats, but the GOP retains the House and gains a majority n the Senate. Without Harry Reid there to block bills from reaching the desk of the President, ___________ will then be forced to veto (or sign) these bills. Exactly how that plays out could be quite interesting.
Hillary, out on the campaign trail now has a habit of using scum tactics to go after people. Her campaign operatives now forcibly remove any reporter from her speeches who represent media outlets not on her “approved” list.
These low tactics are nothing new for the pantsuit candidate:
Morris: I Left When Hillary Hired Secret Police to Go After Woman Victimized by Bill
Dick Morris: I Left When Hillary Hired Secret Police to Go After Woman Victimized by Bill
31 Oct 2014
Friday on OraTV's "Politicking," former advisor to President Bill Clinton, Dick Morris said it was then-first lady Hillary Clinton's "Nixonian" attempt to attack the woman Bill Clinton victimized and sexually harassed by hiring detectives to dig for dirt in their lives Hillary could use against them to smear their character.
Dick Morris said he believes Bill was a very good president but he left because he said, "What really turned me off was what I call secret police. When she [Hillary] hired this fleet of detectives to go around examining all of the woman who had been identified with Clinton. Not for the purpose of divorcing Clinton. Not for the purpose of getting him to stop but for the purpose of developing blackmail material on these woman to cow them into silence that had a Nixonian quality that I hold against her and I continue to."
I tried an experiment on this thread and it worked even better than expected. One for the books.
Right. It was all a rouse to get under people's skin. Now who looks like a jerk.
Wrong. It wasn't to get under anybody's skin, not intentionally. It was to employ exactly the same tactics used on the last GOP candidate and see what the reaction would be. We found out.
If it got under somebody's skin, a quick look in the rear view could have prevented that from happening.
[Edited on 11/2/2014 by alloak41]
You seem to be the one running from the truth Mule. But I don't want to piss in your cornflakes so enjoy your hollow victory next month while us Democrats will enjoy the next 10 years with a Democratic President continuing to repair the damage the Bush Administration created.
Speaking of running from the truth, if Hillary Clinton IS elected will any criticism of her administration be played off as sexism? Bank on it.
With Obama it's because he's a black man, right?
Same song different verse.
You seem to be the one running from the truth Mule. But I don't want to piss in your cornflakes so enjoy your hollow victory next month while us Democrats will enjoy the next 10 years with a Democratic President continuing to repair the damage the Bush Administration created.
Speaking of running from the truth, if Hillary Clinton IS elected will any criticism of her administration be played off as sexism? Bank on it.
With Obama it's because he's a black man, right?
Same song different verse.
I haven't played the black card with Obama in our discussions here but if you think racism does not play a part in the criticism of some conservatives then you are being naive. Same with Hillary I am sure there will be some males who can't deal with a woman calling the shots as it is just human nature.
You seem to be the one running from the truth Mule. But I don't want to piss in your cornflakes so enjoy your hollow victory next month while us Democrats will enjoy the next 10 years with a Democratic President continuing to repair the damage the Bush Administration created.
Speaking of running from the truth, if Hillary Clinton IS elected will any criticism of her administration be played off as sexism? Bank on it.
With Obama it's because he's a black man, right?
Same song different verse.
I haven't played the black card with Obama in our discussions here but if you think racism does not play a part in the criticism of some conservatives then you are being naive. Same with Hillary I am sure there will be some males who can't deal with a woman calling the shots as it is just human nature.
Maybe so, but if racism is as rampant as some lead us to believe, it could be argued that Barack would have never been elected in the first place. Makes it seem like a convenient excuse.
You seem to be the one running from the truth Mule. But I don't want to piss in your cornflakes so enjoy your hollow victory next month while us Democrats will enjoy the next 10 years with a Democratic President continuing to repair the damage the Bush Administration created.
Speaking of running from the truth, if Hillary Clinton IS elected will any criticism of her administration be played off as sexism? Bank on it.
With Obama it's because he's a black man, right?
Same song different verse.
I haven't played the black card with Obama in our discussions here but if you think racism does not play a part in the criticism of some conservatives then you are being naive. Same with Hillary I am sure there will be some males who can't deal with a woman calling the shots as it is just human nature.
Maybe so, but if racism is as rampant as some lead us to believe, it could be argued that Barack would have never been elected in the first place. Makes it seem like a convenient excuse.
The flaw in your logic is you are assuming the majority of Americans are racist so they would not have voted for Obama which obviously was not the case.
60 million Americans voted for Romney and against Obama in 2012 so, IMHO, I am willing to bet some percentage of those voters did so because they are racist.
Now could there be some racists amoungst the 65.9 million voters who voted for Obama just because he was a Democrat? sure but it seems less likely a racist would vote for an Afro-American for President yes?
[Edited on 11/2/2014 by Bill_Graham]
Well, I don't believe the majority of Americans are racists. No question there are some among us, always will be.
Hillary campaigned heavily for 13 democrat candidates in the 2014 elections.
All 13 democrat candidates lost.
The problem with Hillary campaigning for you is that she's got to give a speech. That slow, grating. dull monotone and that voice make nails on a blackboard sound good.
The problem with Hillary campaigning for you is that she's got to give a speech. That slow, grating. dull monotone and that voice make nails on a blackboard sound good.
Whatever.
The problem with Hillary campaigning for you is that she's got to give a speech. That slow, grating. dull monotone and that voice make nails on a blackboard sound good.
Whatever.
____________________________
"Whatever" - the walking away snipe of your average 13 year old girl.
You have yet to state why you and the rest of the liberals are all in for Hillary. Could it be her empty resume (lie obama) and corrupt legal past?
The problem with Hillary campaigning for you is that she's got to give a speech. That slow, grating. dull monotone and that voice make nails on a blackboard sound good.
Let's see. In previous posts you've indicated her medical problems, called her an alcoholic, and now you're sharing your expertise in speech & speech pathology - very impressive indeed.
The problem with Hillary campaigning for you is that she's got to give a speech. That slow, grating. dull monotone and that voice make nails on a blackboard sound good.
Whatever.
____________________________
"Whatever" - the walking away snipe of your average 13 year old girl.
You have yet to state why you and the rest of the liberals are all in for Hillary. Could it be her empty resume (lie obama) and corrupt legal past?
Where did I say I was all in for Hillary? Your lack of reading comprehension skills shows why you have no business in this conversation.
The problem with Hillary campaigning for you is that she's got to give a speech. That slow, grating. dull monotone and that voice make nails on a blackboard sound good.
Let's see. In previous posts you've indicated her medical problems, called her an alcoholic, and now you're sharing your expertise in speech & speech pathology - very impressive indeed.
Let's not forget that she doesn't think businesses and corporations create jobs. Impressive.
The problem with Hillary campaigning for you is that she's got to give a speech. That slow, grating. dull monotone and that voice make nails on a blackboard sound good.
Let's see. In previous posts you've indicated her medical problems, called her an alcoholic, and now you're sharing your expertise in speech & speech pathology - very impressive indeed.
Let's not forget that she doesn't think businesses and corporations create jobs. Impressive.
You took that line completely out of context. That is exactly what Fox News did with it.
...and he will repeat it at least 15 times..... get ready for it.............
...and he will repeat it at least 15 times..... get ready for it.............
Yep...home base FOX News.
When in Rome do as the Romans do.
Polly want a cracker?
