Being wasted helps:

She likes to get her drink on. Hanging out in Cartagena in 2012 with her staff at the Summit of the Americas, then-Secretary of State Clinton was photographed with her hair down and a drink in her hand. Hillary apparently outdrank Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) when they were touring Estonia in 2004.

According to a witness, “Hillary won. She stayed correct after four shots.” Terry McAuliffe, new governor of Virginia and Clinton ally, said, “She loves to sit, throw ‘em back…She’s a girl from Illinois who likes to throw ‘em down with the rest of us.” And, of course, she conveniently left town for a wine tour in Australia just in time to miss her first round of questioning on Benghazi

She thinks women who accuse men of sexual harassment are “whiny.”

Were Hillary Clinton a Republican, the report this week that she termed sexual harassment victims of former Senator Bob Packwood (R-OR) “whiney women.” According to the notes of her good friend, the late Professor Diane Blair, Hillary Clinton was “tired of all those whiney women, and she needs him on health care.”

Because political priorities take precedence over sexual mistreatment. This from the lady who proposes that she has faced glass ceilings and invokes the “war on women” regularly to push her agenda. That’s cynical stuff.

Typical slanting of "facts" by connecting the dots when they don't actually connect. If said notes even exist (and until you post a link to a reputable source, they don't), you've taken what someone else wrote in some notes (notes of what, a conversation or just general memoirs or what?), attributed what is in these notes to Hillary Clinton as if it is a direct quote, and then use that to assert that she is anti-women or pro-harassment or whatever point you are trying to make. Good stuff, thanks for the laugh.

She thinks women who accuse men of sexual harassment are “whiny.”

Were Hillary Clinton a Republican, the report this week that she termed sexual harassment victims of former Senator Bob Packwood (R-OR) “whiney women.” According to the notes of her good friend, the late Professor Diane Blair, Hillary Clinton was “tired of all those whiney women, and she needs him on health care.”

Because political priorities take precedence over sexual mistreatment. This from the lady who proposes that she has faced glass ceilings and invokes the “war on women” regularly to push her agenda. That’s cynical stuff.

Typical slanting of "facts" by connecting the dots when they don't actually connect. If said notes even exist (and until you post a link to a reputable source, they don't), you've taken what someone else wrote in some notes (notes of what, a conversation or just general memoirs or what?), attributed what is in these notes to Hillary Clinton as if it is a direct quote, and then use that to assert that she is anti-women or pro-harassment or whatever point you are trying to make. Good stuff, thanks for the laugh.

These connections need to be made, and made relentlessly. Put the Democrats on the receiving
end of it for once.

She’s intimately familiar with the criminal investigation process. No, this isn’t a reference to Benghazi.

Hillary was the only First Lady in American history to be subpoenaed, for her role in the Whitewater scandal. And she was deposed, too – a lot, during Travelgate and Filegate. She was fingerprinted by the FBI. Her fingerprints were found on relevant documents requested by investigators…two years later, in her family quarters.

She thinks women who accuse men of sexual harassment are “whiny.”

Were Hillary Clinton a Republican, the report this week that she termed sexual harassment victims of former Senator Bob Packwood (R-OR) “whiney women.” According to the notes of her good friend, the late Professor Diane Blair, Hillary Clinton was “tired of all those whiney women, and she needs him on health care.”

Because political priorities take precedence over sexual mistreatment. This from the lady who proposes that she has faced glass ceilings and invokes the “war on women” regularly to push her agenda. That’s cynical stuff.

Typical slanting of "facts" by connecting the dots when they don't actually connect. If said notes even exist (and until you post a link to a reputable source, they don't), you've taken what someone else wrote in some notes (notes of what, a conversation or just general memoirs or what?), attributed what is in these notes to Hillary Clinton as if it is a direct quote, and then use that to assert that she is anti-women or pro-harassment or whatever point you are trying to make. Good stuff, thanks for the laugh.

These connections need to be made, and made relentlessly. Put the Democrats on the receiving
end of it for once.

What connections are you talking about specifically? There is no connection here, or at least not by what muleman posted.

The connections are clear.
Other than Hillary being totally unqualified to be president, her choice of making a political decision always out weighs doing the right thing.

One very good example:
Hillary, standing next to the coffin of our dead Libyan ambassador, stating that the Benghazi attack happened because of some obscure internet video. A flat out lie to provide Obama political cover just prior to an election.

The connections are clear.

Maybe in your mind, but that's about it. Whatever connections you are trying to make, you need to offer more than your opinions to even begin to make them. Good luck with that.

The connections are clear.

Maybe in your mind, but that's about it. Whatever connections you are trying to make, you need to offer more than your opinions to even begin to make them. Good luck with that.

____________________________

I need to do nothing more than state my opinion.
If you disagree, state your argument.

The liberals constantly engage in the politics of blame the conservatives, blame the American People, blame, blame, blame.
And call anyone who disagrees with Obama a racist, the typical argument of a weak mind.

Hillary has an empty resume much like Obama.
America is suffering because of an amateur president now and electing another would be devastating.

Funny - amateur president is a new term - in say the last 6 years. Every other president before was somehow qualified...... lol

So who, in either party, would not be an amateur president? What does that even mean? Just another fake issue from the conservatives........

Funny - amateur president is a new term - in say the last 6 years. Every other president before was somehow qualified...... lol

So who, in either party, would not be an amateur president? What does that even mean? Just another fake issue from the conservatives........

__________________________________________

Like Obama, Hillary has no professional experience.

Never ran a company, never employed people nor had to make a decision of consequence.

Hillary is just another pantsuit.

Damn Mule you are already on a Hillary hating roll. It is going to be fun to see what material you come up for her 8 years in the Whitehouse.

Damn Mule you are already on a Hillary hating roll. It is going to be fun to see what material you come up for her 8 years in the Whitehouse.

_____________________________________________

Hillary won't be elected president.
She in not qualified for the job.

America is suffering now because of an unqualified person in the office.
I don't believe The American People will make that mistake again.

Even better: the mid-term election returns will be available in one week.

Damn Mule you are already on a Hillary hating roll. It is going to be fun to see what material you come up for her 8 years in the Whitehouse.

_____________________________________________

Hillary won't be elected president.
She in not qualified for the job.

America is suffering now because of an unqualified person in the office.
I don't believe The American People will make that mistake again.

Even better: the mid-term election returns will be available in one week.

Damn Mule you are already on a Hillary hating roll. It is going to be fun to see what material you come up for her 8 years in the Whitehouse.

_____________________________________________

Hillary won't be elected president.
She in not qualified for the job.

America is suffering now because of an unqualified person in the office.
I don't believe The American People will make that mistake again.

Even better: the mid-term election returns will be available in one week.

You still have not answered who in the GOP has a prayer to beat her? You know why?Because you are scared to death she will be elected so start working on your material.

Damn Mule you are already on a Hillary hating roll. It is going to be fun to see what material you come up for her 8 years in the Whitehouse.

_____________________________________________

Hillary won't be elected president.
She in not qualified for the job.

America is suffering now because of an unqualified person in the office.
I don't believe The American People will make that mistake again.

Even better: the mid-term election returns will be available in one week.

You still have not answered who in the GOP has a prayer to beat her? You know why?Because you are scared to death she will be elected so start working on your material.

________________________________________________

Wrong.
Speculating two years out is foolish.

Do you really think Hillary can even get her own parities nomination?
She lost the last time.

Hillary needs to handle first things first. Get a handle on her alcoholism above all. It's exacerbating her already serious health problems.

Hillary needs to handle first things first. Get a handle on her alcoholism above all. It's exacerbating her already serious health problems.

You are a reprehensible jackass.

Hillary needs to handle first things first. Get a handle on her alcoholism above all. It's exacerbating her already serious health problems.

You are a reprehensible jackass.

I'm surprised. You don't care about her health and well-being?

[Edited on 10/29/2014 by alloak41]

Hillary needs to handle first things first. Get a handle on her alcoholism above all. It's exacerbating her already serious health problems.

You are a reprehensible jackass.

I'm surprised. You don't care about her health and well-being?

[Edited on 10/29/2014 by alloak41]

The lies you post are libelous. The fact that know nothing about any of this never stops you from being a jackass. Hey, I have a question for you. When did you stop beating your wife?

Hillary needs to handle first things first. Get a handle on her alcoholism above all. It's exacerbating her already serious health problems.

You are a reprehensible jackass.

I'm surprised. You don't care about her health and well-being?

[Edited on 10/29/2014 by alloak41]

The lies you post are libelous. The fact that know nothing about any of this never stops you from being a jackass. Hey, I have a question for you. When did you stop beating your wife?

When Cutter came out and called Romney a Felon, where were you then?

Nobody here batted an eye, objected, or cared about proof.... so clam it.

Note to GOP: Try a Democrat-style campaign for once.

Hillary needs to handle first things first. Get a handle on her alcoholism above all. It's exacerbating her already serious health problems.

You are a reprehensible jackass.

I'm surprised. You don't care about her health and well-being?

[Edited on 10/29/2014 by alloak41]

The lies you post are libelous. The fact that know nothing about any of this never stops you from being a jackass. Hey, I have a question for you. When did you stop beating your wife?

When Cutter came out and called Romney a Felon, where were you then?

Nobody here batted an eye, objected, or cared about proof.... so clam it.

Note to GOP: Try a Democrat-style campaign for once.

Why is old news only relevant when you want it to be.
So now you think it is ok for you to act like that? And then you will be incensed when someone does this to your candidate. You want it both ways. And that remark you made was as reprehensible as anything that has been said on this site.

Hillary needs to handle first things first. Get a handle on her alcoholism above all. It's exacerbating her already serious health problems.

So now you're either a doctor or counselor? Please post your notes from Hillary's last office visit with you. I'm sure we can put aside HIPAA regulations this one time for the sake of your credibility.

Hillary needs to handle first things first. Get a handle on her alcoholism above all. It's exacerbating her already serious health problems.

You are a reprehensible jackass.

I'm surprised. You don't care about her health and well-being?

The lies you post are libelous. The fact that know nothing about any of this never stops you from being a jackass. Hey, I have a question for you. When did you stop beating your wife?

When Cutter came out and called Romney a Felon, where were you then?

Nobody here batted an eye, objected, or cared about proof.... so clam it.

Note to GOP: Try a Democrat-style campaign for once.

Funny that you keep bringing up Romney as an excuse for your own behavior and lies, you must be pretty bitter.

As for campaign styles, the GOP wrote the book on going negative, although both sides are doing it even more than I can recall during this election cycle...all the PAC money is certainly making the marketing agencies that produce the ads and the media outlets that run them a lot of money, so I guess at least it is good for the economy on some level (even if they they make the entire electoral process feel even dirtier than it is). The Koch brothers PAC, among other GOP interests including the Republican Governor's Alliance are all spending big here to run ads in support of the independent candidate in hope that support for him siphons votes from the democrat (who by all polling data would win going away if the independent dropped out)...it might not be illegal or even unethical, but it is certainly dishonest to try to promote one candidate when they are really trying to promote someone else.

[Edited on 10/29/2014 by gondicar]

Hillary needs to handle first things first. Get a handle on her alcoholism above all. It's exacerbating her already serious health problems.

You are a reprehensible jackass.

I'm surprised. You don't care about her health and well-being?

The lies you post are libelous. The fact that know nothing about any of this never stops you from being a jackass. Hey, I have a question for you. When did you stop beating your wife?

When Cutter came out and called Romney a Felon, where were you then?

Nobody here batted an eye, objected, or cared about proof.... so clam it.

Note to GOP: Try a Democrat-style campaign for once.

Funny that you keep bringing up Romney as an excuse for your own behavior and lies, you must be pretty bitter.
[Edited on 10/29/2014 by gondicar]

I don't see anything outrageous about citing examples from the most recent Presidential campaign. We learned at that time that truth is optional and it didn't seem to bother anybody
then. Why now?

I don't see anything outrageous about citing examples from the most recent Presidential campaign. We learned at that time that truth is optional and it didn't seem to bother anybody then. Why now?

It obviously bothered you, and despite that you don't seem to have a problem with engaging in the same kind of behavior that you find so reprehensible in others.

Also, you are so one-sided in your criticism of this type of politics that its like you are blind to the fact that it isn't one-sided at all.

I don't see anything outrageous about citing examples from the most recent Presidential campaign. We learned at that time that truth is optional and it didn't seem to bother anybody then. Why now?

It obviously bothered you, and despite that you don't seem to have a problem with engaging in the same kind of behavior that you find so reprehensible in others.

Also, you are so one-sided in your criticism of this type of politics that its like you are blind to the fact that it isn't one-sided at all.

1. I'm just a regular Joe Blow. I'm not involved in running campaigns and my statements aren't picked up by the major media. Your comparison is quite a stretch.

2. The GOP ran that campaign like a game of tiddly-winks by comparison and you know it. Nobody on the Left cared at that time, but they start crying when the "behavior" is turned back on them, even by a regular Joe Blow. Interesting.

I don't see anything outrageous about citing examples from the most recent Presidential campaign. We learned at that time that truth is optional and it didn't seem to bother anybody then. Why now?

It obviously bothered you, and despite that you don't seem to have a problem with engaging in the same kind of behavior that you find so reprehensible in others.

Also, you are so one-sided in your criticism of this type of politics that its like you are blind to the fact that it isn't one-sided at all.

1. I'm just a regular Joe Blow. I'm not involved in running campaigns and my statements aren't picked up by the major media. Your comparison is quite a stretch.

So Joe,

That gives you license to just make up things on the fly & say anything even if you have no factual basis to support it?

1. I'm just a regular Joe Blow. I'm not involved in running campaigns and my statements aren't picked up by the major media. Your comparison is quite a stretch.

Nice rationalization. By that reasoning, no one here has any reason to be truthful and bears no responsibility for the things they post, lies and distortions are all good from us regular Jo Blows as far as you are concerned. Got it.

2. The GOP ran that campaign like a game of tiddly-winks by comparison and you know it. Nobody on the Left cared at that time, but they start crying when the "behavior" is turned back on them, even by a regular Joe Blow. Interesting.

Complete BS, Mr. Joe Blow. Try taking off your red-state colored glasses for once and see the world for how it really is. Sheesh.

I don't see anything outrageous about citing examples from the most recent Presidential campaign. We learned at that time that truth is optional and it didn't seem to bother anybody then. Why now?

It obviously bothered you, and despite that you don't seem to have a problem with engaging in the same kind of behavior that you find so reprehensible in others.

Also, you are so one-sided in your criticism of this type of politics that its like you are blind to the fact that it isn't one-sided at all.

1. I'm just a regular Joe Blow. I'm not involved in running campaigns and my statements aren't picked up by the major media. Your comparison is quite a stretch.

So Joe,

That gives you license to just make up things on the fly & say anything even if you have no factual basis to support it?

Are you aiming for comedy here?

"No factual basis to support it?" Please.

That didn't matter to you all in 2011 and 12. Why does it matter now? I don't remember it bothering ONE person on the Left here at the time. The GOP should unload with both barrels on whoever the D candidate is. That's the way she rolls, so turn the tables.

I'm getting the exact reaction I was aiming for.

[Edited on 10/29/2014 by alloak41]

Are you aiming for comedy here?

You are the lead comic here. And it just keeps getting funnier with every post!

That didn't matter to you all in 2011 and 12. Why does it matter now? I don't remember it bothering ONE person on the Left here at the time. The GOP should unload with both barrels on whoever the D candidate is. That's the way she rolls, so turn the tables.

We all know you have a very selective memory.

As far a turning the tables, do you mean like this...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2012/07/19/mitt-romneys-misleading-attack-ad/

This part of the article is a good summation of how the political mud-slinging gets out of control once it starts to become a story in and of itself...seeing it big time here in a relatively small market that is over saturated with questionable negative politics from all sides....

What I didn't say, but perhaps should have, is that once we in the media deem something to be a "gaffe," the normal rules of journalism cease to apply, and we begin running and rerunning the attack ads that relate to the gaffe, and playing clips of surrogates mocking the gaffe, and so on.

All this is done, in part, to retroactively justify the coverage of the initial comment: "See, we told you this would be a big deal, and now it is a big deal." But that is, of course, self-fulfilling, as we have made it a big deal -- and have handed the opposing campaign a reason to make it a big deal -- by giving it wall-to-wall coverage. In doing, we create an incentive for both campaigns to engage in more of this kind of behavior, to make more of these kinds of ads. We are, in effect, encouraging a race to the bottom.

[Edited on 10/29/2014 by gondicar]