The rest on your list are just whack-jobs
For once I totally agree with you!
To refresh your memory, here is the list, of people I cited to show that any US citizen over 35 who has been a resident for 14 years or more is eligible to run for President of the United States of America, regardless of race, creed, color, or mental capacity:
Gus Hall
Angela Davis
Wolfgang Schrodt
John Taylor Bowles
Frank Zappa
Muleman
So, although it is clear that you are mentally incapable of either recognizing or admitting you are incorrect, it is to your credit that you acknowledge that you are, indeed, a whackjob. Good honesty there.
The rest on your list are just whack-jobs
For once I totally agree with you!
To refresh your memory, here is the list, of people I cited to show that any US citizen over 35 who has been a resident for 14 years or more is eligible to run for President of the United States of America, regardless of race, creed, color, or mental capacity:
Gus Hall
Angela Davis
Wolfgang Schrodt
John Taylor Bowles
Frank Zappa
MulemanSo, although it is clear that you are mentally incapable of either recognizing or admitting you are incorrect, it is to your credit that you acknowledge that you are, indeed, a whackjob. Good honesty there.
____________________________________________________________________
I know I am right and you are left aka: wrong.
Ha! Busted! 😛
You obviously cannot understand the difference between those who are eligible to run for the Presidency and those who we should never allow to become President.
The subtly is lost on the weak minded.
You obviously don't know the definition of "ineligible".
Again, your quote, sir:
A Muslim is obligated to always first follow Allah and Islamic law and is therefore ineligible to be President.
If by "ineligible" you actually meant "should not be allowed", then all you had to do was admit that you used "ineligible" incorrectly, and simply restate your point.
You obviously don't know the definition of "ineligible".
Again, your quote, sir:
A Muslim is obligated to always first follow Allah and Islamic law and is therefore ineligible to be President.
If by "ineligible" you actually meant "should not be allowed", then all you had to do was admit that you used "ineligible" incorrectly, and simply restate your point.
______________________________________________________________________
A devote Muslim would be unable to take the oath of office as it requires The Constitution to be followed first and above all other law.
Unless of course they lie as Obama did. He has repeatedly by passed and ignored The Constitution to forward his own political and social justice agenda.
David Holcomb running for president:
Is this guy eligible to run for president? He is not only eligible, he is a declared independent candidate. And he wants to kill em all right now!
I think he will get Muleman's vote, or he might even BE Muleman:
"He says that he and “We the People” are all “Anti-Islam,” and “it is time now for immediate, full force military strikes by the international Christian Crusade on Iran’s nuclear capabilities.” He gives no reason for his hatred of Islam except for the fact that he wants to return the United States to the Judeo-Christian values it was built on."
from http://2016.independent-candidate.org/Holcomb/
David Holcomb running for president:
Is this guy eligible to run for president? He is not only eligible, he is a declared independent candidate. And he wants to kill em all right now!
I think he will get Muleman's vote, or he might even BE Muleman:
"He says that he and “We the People” are all “Anti-Islam,” and “it is time now for immediate, full force military strikes by the international Christian Crusade on Iran’s nuclear capabilities.” He gives no reason for his hatred of Islam except for the fact that he wants to return the United States to the Judeo-Christian values it was built on."
_______________________________________________________________________
Well, now we have at least two Independents running for President. Sanders being the other.
Neither have a chance a chance in hell of being elected but the liberal kids around here have no one else.
What if most the people in the country who are not happy with voting for the lesser of whatever two evils they put out there for us to vote for, used their ballots to write in someone else? Of course the someone we write in will not win, but why should we vote for someone we don't want? There are over 300 million people in this country, we really do not have to settle, we are just used to doing so.
What if most the people in the country who are not happy with voting for the lesser of whatever two evils they put out there for us to vote for, used their ballots to write in someone else? Of course the someone we write in will not win, but why should we vote for someone we don't want? There are over 300 million people in this country, we really do not have to settle, we are just used to doing so.
_____________________________________________________________________
The politicians have covered themselves. Write-in votes are not permitted in most States and would just screw up the current system the politicians have set up.
The two political parties shall chose who you may vote for and will control the people!
So, Ibrahim Hooper, spokesman for CAIR, an Islamic Extremist Terrorism support group, doesn’t like what Dr. Carson said. Too bad.
Trump also got it right. There is a big difference between a Muslim American Citizen and Islamic Extremist Terrorists. Trump is also not responsible for what someone in a crowd says nor is he obligated to defend Obama.
Why is it that Democrats consider calling someone a Muslim an insult?
Would you care if I call you a Muslim or say you are Muslim if you aren't????
____________________________________________________________________
Nice dodge.
Why is it that Democrats consider calling someone a Muslim an insult?
Would you care if I call you a Muslim or say you are Muslim if you aren't????
________________________________________________________________________
Answering my question with your own question is evasion.
Why are you afraid to answer my question?
LMFAO!!!!! The answer is simple if you understand simple things which I am not sure you do so I will give you the simple and obvious answer.
Democrats DON'T consider calling someone a Muslim an insult. However, calling someone who isn't a Muslim a Muslim is flat out lying and deceiving people into thinking someone is something that they are not at a time when they know a large percentage of Americans, mostly the dumb ones compare being Muslim to Islamic extremism. We can play this game on and on if you want. You know damned well what is being implied when a Republican makes a claim like Carson did.
By the way Muleman 1994. I have to apologize. I didn't realize that you are Muslim until informed by someone else on the board and I didn't mean to offend you in any way. Nothing wrong with your Muslim way of life and if you please you can under our American Constitution run for POTUS if you want to.
Democrats DON'T consider calling someone a Muslim an insult. However, calling someone who isn't a Muslim a Muslim is flat out lying and deceiving people into thinking someone is something that they are not at a time when they know a large percentage of Americans, mostly the dumb ones compare being Muslim to Islamic extremism.
However, it's perfectly OK to use the Crusades to compare present day Christians to Islamic Extremists. Funny how that works.
Democrats DON'T consider calling someone a Muslim an insult. However, calling someone who isn't a Muslim a Muslim is flat out lying and deceiving people into thinking someone is something that they are not at a time when they know a large percentage of Americans, mostly the dumb ones compare being Muslim to Islamic extremism.
However, it's perfectly OK to use the Crusades to compare present day Christians to Islamic Extremists. Funny how that works.
Are there really any hyperbole limits anymore? 😉
Democrats DON'T consider calling someone a Muslim an insult. However, calling someone who isn't a Muslim a Muslim is flat out lying and deceiving people into thinking someone is something that they are not at a time when they know a large percentage of Americans, mostly the dumb ones compare being Muslim to Islamic extremism.
However, it's perfectly OK to use the Crusades to compare present day Christians to Islamic Extremists. Funny how that works.
Are there really any hyperbole limits anymore? 😉
Not for alloak, that's for sure!
When are the hardline Christians and Muslims going to recognize they are EXACTLY THE SAME and kiss and make up, and get on with their joint mission of abolishing rationality worldwide?
When are the hardline Christians and Muslims going to recognize they are EXACTLY THE SAME and kiss and make up, and get on with their joint mission of abolishing rationality worldwide?
Exactly the same in what way?
quote:
When are the hardline Christians and Muslims going to recognize they are EXACTLY THE SAME and kiss and make up, and get on with their joint mission of abolishing rationality worldwide?Exactly the same in what way?
Intolerant and dictatorial. Both sects believe their puny God is the one and true God. They therefore think they can impose their mythology and judgement on others.
quote:
When are the hardline Christians and Muslims going to recognize they are EXACTLY THE SAME and kiss and make up, and get on with their joint mission of abolishing rationality worldwide?Exactly the same in what way?
Intolerant and dictatorial. Both sects believe their puny God is the one and true God. They therefore think they can impose their mythology and judgement on others.
___________________________________________________________________
Funny. That is exactly what Democrats think.
Good thing I'm not a Democrat.
quote:
When are the hardline Christians and Muslims going to recognize they are EXACTLY THE SAME and kiss and make up, and get on with their joint mission of abolishing rationality worldwide?Exactly the same in what way?
Intolerant and dictatorial. Both sects believe their puny God is the one and true God. They therefore think they can impose their mythology and judgement on others.
So you would equate a pro-traditional stance on marriage to throwing a gay person off a building or burning them to death, for instance?
quote:
When are the hardline Christians and Muslims going to recognize they are EXACTLY THE SAME and kiss and make up, and get on with their joint mission of abolishing rationality worldwide?Exactly the same in what way?
Intolerant and dictatorial. Both sects believe their puny God is the one and true God. They therefore think they can impose their mythology and judgement on others.
So you would equate a pro-traditional stance on marriage to throwing a gay person off a building or burning them to death, for instance?
________________________________________________________________________
That is the lefts conundrum. They can’t support traditional marriage and risk being called homophobic and they can’t openly support their Muslim buddies for the same reason.
That is the lefts conundrum. They can’t support traditional marriage and risk being called homophobic and they can’t openly support their Muslim buddies for the same reason.
Totally. I hate it when people think I am homophobic because I have Muslim friends.
That is the lefts conundrum. They can’t support traditional marriage and risk being called homophobic and they can’t openly support their Muslim buddies for the same reason.
I fully support traditional marriage. I also support same sex marriage. These are not mutually exclusive things.
And like BrerRabbit, as far as I know I have never been called homophobic for having friends who are Muslim.
Just because I'm a paranoid homophobic Muslim schizophrenic doesn't mean they're not out to get us.
Just because I'm a paranoid homophobic Muslim schizophrenic doesn't mean they're not out to get us.
Allah akbar to all your paranoid personas!
Just because I'm a paranoid homophobic Muslim schizophrenic doesn't mean they're not out to get us.
Allah akbar to all your paranoid personas!
Jazakallah
Im a schizophobic Muslim parafoil.
