Still waiting for examples of FOX News anchors incorporating lies into their newscast. Newscasts, not editorial programming. I'll even settle for one time occurrences, not lies that were told repeatedly for years afterward.
One example?
http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/tv/fox/
Again
One more try. Please read carefully...
Examples of FOX NEWS ANCHORS incorporating lies into a NEWSCAST.
BTW, you don't answer questions but you ask them?
Seriously, you are a cipher.
____________________________________________________________
Politifact is a left-wing blog.
It is their mission to try and bring down Fox News using any means necessary including distorting information.Evidently neither Politifact nor you can tell the difference between hard news and opinion.
Luckily for The American People, they fail. The People know better.
That could be a reason Fox News is the most watched, most trusted.I cite something like National Review and its dismissed. But they consider Politifact to be a legitimate source of information.
Enough with the "they" crap. I read articles at NRO fairly often. I might not agree, but I read. Condescend much?
But, let's be clear on this.
Let's say that Megyn Kelly says with determination and confidence that the sky is purple. A website sources a youtube clip of her saying that in full context, then points out that she was, in fact, lying, because it can be proven that the sky is in fact blue. Are you saying that the website that made that proof is not to be believed simply because they pointed it out, or because they might be one of the liberals that you and so many others hate so much?
No I am not saying that at all. But how about if the website in question was dedicated to pointing out the mistakes of Fox News (which it calls lies) but fails to discuss the mistakes of any other news outlets?
And none of this changes the fact that many on the left routinely dismiss any source of information that can be considered conservative.
Except Politifact does the same fact checking for all of the major news networks Doug so fact checking your claim forces me to state on the truth-o-meter your statement is "Pants on Fire" 😛
Here is the page for CNBC
http://www.politifact.com/search/statements/?q=CNBC
[Edited on 2/12/2015 by Bill_Graham]
[Edited on 2/12/2015 by Bill_Graham]
OK. You've convinced me. Politifact is non-partisan. Never let it be said I refused to change my mind in the face of evidence.
Fair enough Doug, now if only the GOP in Congress were as flexible things might actually get done for the good of the people in this country. 😛
On keller’s non-proof evidence:
________________________________________
quote:
________________________________________
Luckily for The American People, they fail. The People know better.
That could be a reason Fox News is the most watched, most trusted.
________________________________________And this, my friends, explains the dumbing down of America. This explains "low-information voters" in a nutshell. I don't know if this goes in the category of lying, or if it goes into the category of piss-poor sloppy reporting, but I can't think of any other network that has been caught reporting information from satire websites as actual news on multiple occasions. Where is the quality control at that network? When you've been caught reporting satire websites as news at least three times, how can anybody trust them?
Fox News Falls For Satire Of Obama Banning Doughnut Sprinkles
http://reverbpress.com/politics/ha-fox-news-falls-for-satire-of-obama-banni ng-doughnut-sprinkles-video/
That “story” was presented as satire for the purpose of humor.
Of course the liberals didn’t think it was funny but that is too bad.
No “lie” there either.Fox News' Anna Kooiman Falls For Parody About Obama Funding Muslim Museum
(Note - At least they apologized for this one)http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/06/fox-news-anna-kooiman-obama-parody _n_4053994.html
Anna Kooiman reported the exact same information as did The N.Y. Times, Associated Press and NBC News.
No “Lie” here.
Fox News Posts Onion Obama Story Amid Real News
http://www.thewrap.com/tv/article/fox-news-site-posts-satiricial-onion-obam a-story-amid-real-news-22840/
Again, clearly stated as a parody from The Onion.
The liberal can’t stand it when anyone has some fun with their false messiah.Again, no “lie” here.
By the way, I seem to see a trend here. One particular subject seems to drive Fox News to report something as news without conducting any fact checking whatsoever. Can you spot the subject? Look real hard.
________________________________________Bingo!!!
Bingo?
Wrong again son.Since Bingo isn’t working for you, try the lottery aka: gambling for idiots.
Still no proof of Fox News lying.
If you want good examples of lying; see obama, hillary or williams
There we have outright lying to push their political agenda of to pump up their celebrity.
LOL! LOL! Thanks for proving my point!
On keller’s non-proof evidence:
________________________________________
quote:
________________________________________
Luckily for The American People, they fail. The People know better.
That could be a reason Fox News is the most watched, most trusted.
________________________________________And this, my friends, explains the dumbing down of America. This explains "low-information voters" in a nutshell. I don't know if this goes in the category of lying, or if it goes into the category of piss-poor sloppy reporting, but I can't think of any other network that has been caught reporting information from satire websites as actual news on multiple occasions. Where is the quality control at that network? When you've been caught reporting satire websites as news at least three times, how can anybody trust them?
Fox News Falls For Satire Of Obama Banning Doughnut Sprinkles
http://reverbpress.com/politics/ha-fox-news-falls-for-satire-of-obama-banni ng-doughnut-sprinkles-video/
That “story” was presented as satire for the purpose of humor.
Of course the liberals didn’t think it was funny but that is too bad.
No “lie” there either.Fox News' Anna Kooiman Falls For Parody About Obama Funding Muslim Museum
(Note - At least they apologized for this one)http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/06/fox-news-anna-kooiman-obama-parody _n_4053994.html
Anna Kooiman reported the exact same information as did The N.Y. Times, Associated Press and NBC News.
No “Lie” here.
Fox News Posts Onion Obama Story Amid Real News
http://www.thewrap.com/tv/article/fox-news-site-posts-satiricial-onion-obam a-story-amid-real-news-22840/
Again, clearly stated as a parody from The Onion.
The liberal can’t stand it when anyone has some fun with their false messiah.Again, no “lie” here.
By the way, I seem to see a trend here. One particular subject seems to drive Fox News to report something as news without conducting any fact checking whatsoever. Can you spot the subject? Look real hard.
________________________________________Bingo!!!
Bingo?
Wrong again son.Since Bingo isn’t working for you, try the lottery aka: gambling for idiots.
Still no proof of Fox News lying.
If you want good examples of lying; see obama, hillary or williams
There we have outright lying to push their political agenda of to pump up their celebrity.LOL! LOL! Thanks for proving my point!
_____________________________________________________________
Exactly.
Some have claimed that Fox News has lied yet there is no proof of their claim.
On keller’s non-proof evidence:
________________________________________
quote:
________________________________________
Luckily for The American People, they fail. The People know better.
That could be a reason Fox News is the most watched, most trusted.
________________________________________And this, my friends, explains the dumbing down of America. This explains "low-information voters" in a nutshell. I don't know if this goes in the category of lying, or if it goes into the category of piss-poor sloppy reporting, but I can't think of any other network that has been caught reporting information from satire websites as actual news on multiple occasions. Where is the quality control at that network? When you've been caught reporting satire websites as news at least three times, how can anybody trust them?
Fox News Falls For Satire Of Obama Banning Doughnut Sprinkles
http://reverbpress.com/politics/ha-fox-news-falls-for-satire-of-obama-banni ng-doughnut-sprinkles-video/
That “story” was presented as satire for the purpose of humor.
Of course the liberals didn’t think it was funny but that is too bad.
No “lie” there either.Fox News' Anna Kooiman Falls For Parody About Obama Funding Muslim Museum
(Note - At least they apologized for this one)http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/06/fox-news-anna-kooiman-obama-parody _n_4053994.html
Anna Kooiman reported the exact same information as did The N.Y. Times, Associated Press and NBC News.
No “Lie” here.
Fox News Posts Onion Obama Story Amid Real News
http://www.thewrap.com/tv/article/fox-news-site-posts-satiricial-onion-obam a-story-amid-real-news-22840/
Again, clearly stated as a parody from The Onion.
The liberal can’t stand it when anyone has some fun with their false messiah.Again, no “lie” here.
By the way, I seem to see a trend here. One particular subject seems to drive Fox News to report something as news without conducting any fact checking whatsoever. Can you spot the subject? Look real hard.
________________________________________Bingo!!!
Bingo?
Wrong again son.Since Bingo isn’t working for you, try the lottery aka: gambling for idiots.
Still no proof of Fox News lying.
If you want good examples of lying; see obama, hillary or williams
There we have outright lying to push their political agenda of to pump up their celebrity.LOL! LOL! Thanks for proving my point!
_____________________________________________________________
Exactly.
Some have claimed that Fox News has lied yet there is no proof of their claim.
Swoosh. <-- that's the sound of the real point flying right over your head.
You are pure comedy gold, Mr. Muleman.
On keller’s non-proof evidence:
________________________________________
quote:
________________________________________
Luckily for The American People, they fail. The People know better.
That could be a reason Fox News is the most watched, most trusted.
________________________________________And this, my friends, explains the dumbing down of America. This explains "low-information voters" in a nutshell. I don't know if this goes in the category of lying, or if it goes into the category of piss-poor sloppy reporting, but I can't think of any other network that has been caught reporting information from satire websites as actual news on multiple occasions. Where is the quality control at that network? When you've been caught reporting satire websites as news at least three times, how can anybody trust them?
Fox News Falls For Satire Of Obama Banning Doughnut Sprinkles
http://reverbpress.com/politics/ha-fox-news-falls-for-satire-of-obama-banni ng-doughnut-sprinkles-video/
That “story” was presented as satire for the purpose of humor.
Of course the liberals didn’t think it was funny but that is too bad.
No “lie” there either.Fox News' Anna Kooiman Falls For Parody About Obama Funding Muslim Museum
(Note - At least they apologized for this one)http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/06/fox-news-anna-kooiman-obama-parody _n_4053994.html
Anna Kooiman reported the exact same information as did The N.Y. Times, Associated Press and NBC News.
No “Lie” here.
Fox News Posts Onion Obama Story Amid Real News
http://www.thewrap.com/tv/article/fox-news-site-posts-satiricial-onion-obam a-story-amid-real-news-22840/
Again, clearly stated as a parody from The Onion.
The liberal can’t stand it when anyone has some fun with their false messiah.Again, no “lie” here.
By the way, I seem to see a trend here. One particular subject seems to drive Fox News to report something as news without conducting any fact checking whatsoever. Can you spot the subject? Look real hard.
________________________________________Bingo!!!
Bingo?
Wrong again son.Since Bingo isn’t working for you, try the lottery aka: gambling for idiots.
Still no proof of Fox News lying.
If you want good examples of lying; see obama, hillary or williams
There we have outright lying to push their political agenda of to pump up their celebrity.LOL! LOL! Thanks for proving my point!
_____________________________________________________________
Exactly.
Some have claimed that Fox News has lied yet there is no proof of their claim.Swoosh. <-- that's the sound of the real point flying right over your head.
You are pure comedy gold, Mr. Muleman.
_________________________________________________________
Of course if you were able to make your point in a lucid manner you might have made a point.
On keller’s non-proof evidence:
________________________________________
quote:
________________________________________
Luckily for The American People, they fail. The People know better.
That could be a reason Fox News is the most watched, most trusted.
________________________________________And this, my friends, explains the dumbing down of America. This explains "low-information voters" in a nutshell. I don't know if this goes in the category of lying, or if it goes into the category of piss-poor sloppy reporting, but I can't think of any other network that has been caught reporting information from satire websites as actual news on multiple occasions. Where is the quality control at that network? When you've been caught reporting satire websites as news at least three times, how can anybody trust them?
Fox News Falls For Satire Of Obama Banning Doughnut Sprinkles
http://reverbpress.com/politics/ha-fox-news-falls-for-satire-of-obama-banni ng-doughnut-sprinkles-video/
That “story” was presented as satire for the purpose of humor.
Of course the liberals didn’t think it was funny but that is too bad.
No “lie” there either.Fox News' Anna Kooiman Falls For Parody About Obama Funding Muslim Museum
(Note - At least they apologized for this one)http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/06/fox-news-anna-kooiman-obama-parody _n_4053994.html
Anna Kooiman reported the exact same information as did The N.Y. Times, Associated Press and NBC News.
No “Lie” here.
Fox News Posts Onion Obama Story Amid Real News
http://www.thewrap.com/tv/article/fox-news-site-posts-satiricial-onion-obam a-story-amid-real-news-22840/
Again, clearly stated as a parody from The Onion.
The liberal can’t stand it when anyone has some fun with their false messiah.Again, no “lie” here.
By the way, I seem to see a trend here. One particular subject seems to drive Fox News to report something as news without conducting any fact checking whatsoever. Can you spot the subject? Look real hard.
________________________________________Bingo!!!
Bingo?
Wrong again son.Since Bingo isn’t working for you, try the lottery aka: gambling for idiots.
Still no proof of Fox News lying.
If you want good examples of lying; see obama, hillary or williams
There we have outright lying to push their political agenda of to pump up their celebrity.LOL! LOL! Thanks for proving my point!
_____________________________________________________________
Exactly.
Some have claimed that Fox News has lied yet there is no proof of their claim.Swoosh. <-- that's the sound of the real point flying right over your head.
You are pure comedy gold, Mr. Muleman.
_________________________________________________________
Of course if you were able to make your point in a lucid manner you might have made a point.
The last response was pure comic gold. Very ironic gold.
On keller’s non-proof evidence:
________________________________________
quote:
________________________________________
Luckily for The American People, they fail. The People know better.
That could be a reason Fox News is the most watched, most trusted.
________________________________________And this, my friends, explains the dumbing down of America. This explains "low-information voters" in a nutshell. I don't know if this goes in the category of lying, or if it goes into the category of piss-poor sloppy reporting, but I can't think of any other network that has been caught reporting information from satire websites as actual news on multiple occasions. Where is the quality control at that network? When you've been caught reporting satire websites as news at least three times, how can anybody trust them?
Fox News Falls For Satire Of Obama Banning Doughnut Sprinkles
http://reverbpress.com/politics/ha-fox-news-falls-for-satire-of-obama-banni ng-doughnut-sprinkles-video/
That “story” was presented as satire for the purpose of humor.
Of course the liberals didn’t think it was funny but that is too bad.
No “lie” there either.Fox News' Anna Kooiman Falls For Parody About Obama Funding Muslim Museum
(Note - At least they apologized for this one)http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/06/fox-news-anna-kooiman-obama-parody _n_4053994.html
Anna Kooiman reported the exact same information as did The N.Y. Times, Associated Press and NBC News.
No “Lie” here.
Fox News Posts Onion Obama Story Amid Real News
http://www.thewrap.com/tv/article/fox-news-site-posts-satiricial-onion-obam a-story-amid-real-news-22840/
Again, clearly stated as a parody from The Onion.
The liberal can’t stand it when anyone has some fun with their false messiah.Again, no “lie” here.
By the way, I seem to see a trend here. One particular subject seems to drive Fox News to report something as news without conducting any fact checking whatsoever. Can you spot the subject? Look real hard.
________________________________________Bingo!!!
Bingo?
Wrong again son.Since Bingo isn’t working for you, try the lottery aka: gambling for idiots.
Still no proof of Fox News lying.
If you want good examples of lying; see obama, hillary or williams
There we have outright lying to push their political agenda of to pump up their celebrity.LOL! LOL! Thanks for proving my point!
_____________________________________________________________
Exactly.
Some have claimed that Fox News has lied yet there is no proof of their claim.Swoosh. <-- that's the sound of the real point flying right over your head.
You are pure comedy gold, Mr. Muleman.
_________________________________________________________
Of course if you were able to make your point in a lucid manner you might have made a point.
The last response was pure comic gold. Very ironic gold.
_______________________________________________________________
Rhetoric and petty banter may amuse some but you still have not proven your “Fox News Lies” lie.
When you lie, it is hard to prove it isn’t it?
Just Say No to Monica Lewinsky's Boyfriend's Wife in 2016
On keller’s non-proof evidence:
________________________________________
quote:
________________________________________
Luckily for The American People, they fail. The People know better.
That could be a reason Fox News is the most watched, most trusted.
________________________________________And this, my friends, explains the dumbing down of America. This explains "low-information voters" in a nutshell. I don't know if this goes in the category of lying, or if it goes into the category of piss-poor sloppy reporting, but I can't think of any other network that has been caught reporting information from satire websites as actual news on multiple occasions. Where is the quality control at that network? When you've been caught reporting satire websites as news at least three times, how can anybody trust them?
Fox News Falls For Satire Of Obama Banning Doughnut Sprinkles
http://reverbpress.com/politics/ha-fox-news-falls-for-satire-of-obama-banni ng-doughnut-sprinkles-video/
That “story” was presented as satire for the purpose of humor.
Of course the liberals didn’t think it was funny but that is too bad.
No “lie” there either.Fox News' Anna Kooiman Falls For Parody About Obama Funding Muslim Museum
(Note - At least they apologized for this one)http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/06/fox-news-anna-kooiman-obama-parody _n_4053994.html
Anna Kooiman reported the exact same information as did The N.Y. Times, Associated Press and NBC News.
No “Lie” here.
Fox News Posts Onion Obama Story Amid Real News
http://www.thewrap.com/tv/article/fox-news-site-posts-satiricial-onion-obam a-story-amid-real-news-22840/
Again, clearly stated as a parody from The Onion.
The liberal can’t stand it when anyone has some fun with their false messiah.Again, no “lie” here.
By the way, I seem to see a trend here. One particular subject seems to drive Fox News to report something as news without conducting any fact checking whatsoever. Can you spot the subject? Look real hard.
________________________________________Bingo!!!
Bingo?
Wrong again son.Since Bingo isn’t working for you, try the lottery aka: gambling for idiots.
Still no proof of Fox News lying.
If you want good examples of lying; see obama, hillary or williams
There we have outright lying to push their political agenda of to pump up their celebrity.LOL! LOL! Thanks for proving my point!
_____________________________________________________________
Exactly.
Some have claimed that Fox News has lied yet there is no proof of their claim.Swoosh. <-- that's the sound of the real point flying right over your head.
You are pure comedy gold, Mr. Muleman.
_________________________________________________________
Of course if you were able to make your point in a lucid manner you might have made a point.
The last response was pure comic gold. Very ironic gold.
_______________________________________________________________
Rhetoric and petty banter may amuse some but you still have not proven your “Fox News Lies” lie.
When you lie, it is hard to prove it isn’t it?
Just Say No to Monica Lewinsky's Boyfriend's Wife in 2016
You can deny all that you want, but even conservatives on here agree that Fox lies. You are just a little slower on the uptake. 😛
On keller’s non-proof evidence:
________________________________________
quote:
________________________________________
Luckily for The American People, they fail. The People know better.
That could be a reason Fox News is the most watched, most trusted.
________________________________________And this, my friends, explains the dumbing down of America. This explains "low-information voters" in a nutshell. I don't know if this goes in the category of lying, or if it goes into the category of piss-poor sloppy reporting, but I can't think of any other network that has been caught reporting information from satire websites as actual news on multiple occasions. Where is the quality control at that network? When you've been caught reporting satire websites as news at least three times, how can anybody trust them?
Fox News Falls For Satire Of Obama Banning Doughnut Sprinkles
http://reverbpress.com/politics/ha-fox-news-falls-for-satire-of-obama-banni ng-doughnut-sprinkles-video/
That “story” was presented as satire for the purpose of humor.
Of course the liberals didn’t think it was funny but that is too bad.
No “lie” there either.Fox News' Anna Kooiman Falls For Parody About Obama Funding Muslim Museum
(Note - At least they apologized for this one)http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/06/fox-news-anna-kooiman-obama-parody _n_4053994.html
Anna Kooiman reported the exact same information as did The N.Y. Times, Associated Press and NBC News.
No “Lie” here.
Fox News Posts Onion Obama Story Amid Real News
http://www.thewrap.com/tv/article/fox-news-site-posts-satiricial-onion-obam a-story-amid-real-news-22840/
Again, clearly stated as a parody from The Onion.
The liberal can’t stand it when anyone has some fun with their false messiah.Again, no “lie” here.
By the way, I seem to see a trend here. One particular subject seems to drive Fox News to report something as news without conducting any fact checking whatsoever. Can you spot the subject? Look real hard.
________________________________________Bingo!!!
Bingo?
Wrong again son.Since Bingo isn’t working for you, try the lottery aka: gambling for idiots.
Still no proof of Fox News lying.
If you want good examples of lying; see obama, hillary or williams
There we have outright lying to push their political agenda of to pump up their celebrity.LOL! LOL! Thanks for proving my point!
_____________________________________________________________
Exactly.
Some have claimed that Fox News has lied yet there is no proof of their claim.Swoosh. <-- that's the sound of the real point flying right over your head.
You are pure comedy gold, Mr. Muleman.
_________________________________________________________
Of course if you were able to make your point in a lucid manner you might have made a point.
The last response was pure comic gold. Very ironic gold.
_______________________________________________________________
Rhetoric and petty banter may amuse some but you still have not proven your “Fox News Lies” lie.
When you lie, it is hard to prove it isn’t it?
Just Say No to Monica Lewinsky's Boyfriend's Wife in 2016
You can deny all that you want, but even conservatives on here agree that Fox lies. You are just a little slower on the uptake. 😛
_____________________________________________________________________
Prove it.
On keller’s non-proof evidence:
________________________________________
quote:
________________________________________
Luckily for The American People, they fail. The People know better.
That could be a reason Fox News is the most watched, most trusted.
________________________________________And this, my friends, explains the dumbing down of America. This explains "low-information voters" in a nutshell. I don't know if this goes in the category of lying, or if it goes into the category of piss-poor sloppy reporting, but I can't think of any other network that has been caught reporting information from satire websites as actual news on multiple occasions. Where is the quality control at that network? When you've been caught reporting satire websites as news at least three times, how can anybody trust them?
Fox News Falls For Satire Of Obama Banning Doughnut Sprinkles
http://reverbpress.com/politics/ha-fox-news-falls-for-satire-of-obama-banni ng-doughnut-sprinkles-video/
That “story” was presented as satire for the purpose of humor.
Of course the liberals didn’t think it was funny but that is too bad.
No “lie” there either.Fox News' Anna Kooiman Falls For Parody About Obama Funding Muslim Museum
(Note - At least they apologized for this one)http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/06/fox-news-anna-kooiman-obama-parody _n_4053994.html
Anna Kooiman reported the exact same information as did The N.Y. Times, Associated Press and NBC News.
No “Lie” here.
Fox News Posts Onion Obama Story Amid Real News
http://www.thewrap.com/tv/article/fox-news-site-posts-satiricial-onion-obam a-story-amid-real-news-22840/
Again, clearly stated as a parody from The Onion.
The liberal can’t stand it when anyone has some fun with their false messiah.Again, no “lie” here.
By the way, I seem to see a trend here. One particular subject seems to drive Fox News to report something as news without conducting any fact checking whatsoever. Can you spot the subject? Look real hard.
________________________________________Bingo!!!
Bingo?
Wrong again son.Since Bingo isn’t working for you, try the lottery aka: gambling for idiots.
Still no proof of Fox News lying.
If you want good examples of lying; see obama, hillary or williams
There we have outright lying to push their political agenda of to pump up their celebrity.LOL! LOL! Thanks for proving my point!
_____________________________________________________________
Exactly.
Some have claimed that Fox News has lied yet there is no proof of their claim.Swoosh. <-- that's the sound of the real point flying right over your head.
You are pure comedy gold, Mr. Muleman.
_________________________________________________________
Of course if you were able to make your point in a lucid manner you might have made a point.
The last response was pure comic gold. Very ironic gold.
_______________________________________________________________
Rhetoric and petty banter may amuse some but you still have not proven your “Fox News Lies” lie.
When you lie, it is hard to prove it isn’t it?
Just Say No to Monica Lewinsky's Boyfriend's Wife in 2016
You can deny all that you want, but even conservatives on here agree that Fox lies. You are just a little slower on the uptake. 😛
_____________________________________________________________________
Prove it.
Already have.
On keller’s non-proof evidence:
________________________________________
quote:
________________________________________
Luckily for The American People, they fail. The People know better.
That could be a reason Fox News is the most watched, most trusted.
________________________________________And this, my friends, explains the dumbing down of America. This explains "low-information voters" in a nutshell. I don't know if this goes in the category of lying, or if it goes into the category of piss-poor sloppy reporting, but I can't think of any other network that has been caught reporting information from satire websites as actual news on multiple occasions. Where is the quality control at that network? When you've been caught reporting satire websites as news at least three times, how can anybody trust them?
Fox News Falls For Satire Of Obama Banning Doughnut Sprinkles
http://reverbpress.com/politics/ha-fox-news-falls-for-satire-of-obama-banni ng-doughnut-sprinkles-video/
That “story” was presented as satire for the purpose of humor.
Of course the liberals didn’t think it was funny but that is too bad.
No “lie” there either.Fox News' Anna Kooiman Falls For Parody About Obama Funding Muslim Museum
(Note - At least they apologized for this one)http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/06/fox-news-anna-kooiman-obama-parody _n_4053994.html
Anna Kooiman reported the exact same information as did The N.Y. Times, Associated Press and NBC News.
No “Lie” here.
Fox News Posts Onion Obama Story Amid Real News
http://www.thewrap.com/tv/article/fox-news-site-posts-satiricial-onion-obam a-story-amid-real-news-22840/
Again, clearly stated as a parody from The Onion.
The liberal can’t stand it when anyone has some fun with their false messiah.Again, no “lie” here.
By the way, I seem to see a trend here. One particular subject seems to drive Fox News to report something as news without conducting any fact checking whatsoever. Can you spot the subject? Look real hard.
________________________________________Bingo!!!
Bingo?
Wrong again son.Since Bingo isn’t working for you, try the lottery aka: gambling for idiots.
Still no proof of Fox News lying.
If you want good examples of lying; see obama, hillary or williams
There we have outright lying to push their political agenda of to pump up their celebrity.LOL! LOL! Thanks for proving my point!
_____________________________________________________________
Exactly.
Some have claimed that Fox News has lied yet there is no proof of their claim.Swoosh. <-- that's the sound of the real point flying right over your head.
You are pure comedy gold, Mr. Muleman.
_________________________________________________________
Of course if you were able to make your point in a lucid manner you might have made a point.
The last response was pure comic gold. Very ironic gold.
_______________________________________________________________
Rhetoric and petty banter may amuse some but you still have not proven your “Fox News Lies” lie.
When you lie, it is hard to prove it isn’t it?
Just Say No to Monica Lewinsky's Boyfriend's Wife in 2016
You can deny all that you want, but even conservatives on here agree that Fox lies. You are just a little slower on the uptake. 😛
_____________________________________________________________________
Prove it.
Already have.
___________________________________________________________________
Not one example from a creditable source that Fox News lied but of course obama, hillary and williams have lied often and it has been reported by many creditable news organizations.
On keller’s non-proof evidence:
________________________________________
quote:
________________________________________
Luckily for The American People, they fail. The People know better.
That could be a reason Fox News is the most watched, most trusted.
________________________________________And this, my friends, explains the dumbing down of America. This explains "low-information voters" in a nutshell. I don't know if this goes in the category of lying, or if it goes into the category of piss-poor sloppy reporting, but I can't think of any other network that has been caught reporting information from satire websites as actual news on multiple occasions. Where is the quality control at that network? When you've been caught reporting satire websites as news at least three times, how can anybody trust them?
Fox News Falls For Satire Of Obama Banning Doughnut Sprinkles
http://reverbpress.com/politics/ha-fox-news-falls-for-satire-of-obama-banni ng-doughnut-sprinkles-video/
That “story” was presented as satire for the purpose of humor.
Of course the liberals didn’t think it was funny but that is too bad.
No “lie” there either.Fox News' Anna Kooiman Falls For Parody About Obama Funding Muslim Museum
(Note - At least they apologized for this one)http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/06/fox-news-anna-kooiman-obama-parody _n_4053994.html
Anna Kooiman reported the exact same information as did The N.Y. Times, Associated Press and NBC News.
No “Lie” here.
Fox News Posts Onion Obama Story Amid Real News
http://www.thewrap.com/tv/article/fox-news-site-posts-satiricial-onion-obam a-story-amid-real-news-22840/
Again, clearly stated as a parody from The Onion.
The liberal can’t stand it when anyone has some fun with their false messiah.Again, no “lie” here.
By the way, I seem to see a trend here. One particular subject seems to drive Fox News to report something as news without conducting any fact checking whatsoever. Can you spot the subject? Look real hard.
________________________________________Bingo!!!
Bingo?
Wrong again son.Since Bingo isn’t working for you, try the lottery aka: gambling for idiots.
Still no proof of Fox News lying.
If you want good examples of lying; see obama, hillary or williams
There we have outright lying to push their political agenda of to pump up their celebrity.LOL! LOL! Thanks for proving my point!
_____________________________________________________________
Exactly.
Some have claimed that Fox News has lied yet there is no proof of their claim.Swoosh. <-- that's the sound of the real point flying right over your head.
You are pure comedy gold, Mr. Muleman.
_________________________________________________________
Of course if you were able to make your point in a lucid manner you might have made a point.
The last response was pure comic gold. Very ironic gold.
_______________________________________________________________
Rhetoric and petty banter may amuse some but you still have not proven your “Fox News Lies” lie.
When you lie, it is hard to prove it isn’t it?
Just Say No to Monica Lewinsky's Boyfriend's Wife in 2016
You can deny all that you want, but even conservatives on here agree that Fox lies. You are just a little slower on the uptake. 😛
_____________________________________________________________________
Prove it.
Already have.
___________________________________________________________________
Not one example from a creditable source that Fox News lied but of course obama, hillary and williams have lied often and it has been reported by many creditable news organizations.
Everyone here, even the conservatives, now know Fox lies. Doughron, who is far smarter than you could ever be, agrees now.
You can lie and deny but it doesn't change the facts.
On keller’s non-proof evidence:
________________________________________
quote:
________________________________________
Luckily for The American People, they fail. The People know better.
That could be a reason Fox News is the most watched, most trusted.
________________________________________And this, my friends, explains the dumbing down of America. This explains "low-information voters" in a nutshell. I don't know if this goes in the category of lying, or if it goes into the category of piss-poor sloppy reporting, but I can't think of any other network that has been caught reporting information from satire websites as actual news on multiple occasions. Where is the quality control at that network? When you've been caught reporting satire websites as news at least three times, how can anybody trust them?
Fox News Falls For Satire Of Obama Banning Doughnut Sprinkles
http://reverbpress.com/politics/ha-fox-news-falls-for-satire-of-obama-banni ng-doughnut-sprinkles-video/
That “story” was presented as satire for the purpose of humor.
Of course the liberals didn’t think it was funny but that is too bad.
No “lie” there either.Fox News' Anna Kooiman Falls For Parody About Obama Funding Muslim Museum
(Note - At least they apologized for this one)http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/06/fox-news-anna-kooiman-obama-parody _n_4053994.html
Anna Kooiman reported the exact same information as did The N.Y. Times, Associated Press and NBC News.
No “Lie” here.
Fox News Posts Onion Obama Story Amid Real News
http://www.thewrap.com/tv/article/fox-news-site-posts-satiricial-onion-obam a-story-amid-real-news-22840/
Again, clearly stated as a parody from The Onion.
The liberal can’t stand it when anyone has some fun with their false messiah.Again, no “lie” here.
By the way, I seem to see a trend here. One particular subject seems to drive Fox News to report something as news without conducting any fact checking whatsoever. Can you spot the subject? Look real hard.
________________________________________Bingo!!!
Bingo?
Wrong again son.Since Bingo isn’t working for you, try the lottery aka: gambling for idiots.
Still no proof of Fox News lying.
If you want good examples of lying; see obama, hillary or williams
There we have outright lying to push their political agenda of to pump up their celebrity.
You missed the point completely. Fox News took fake news articles written as satire by somebody else and then reported it as actual news. Fox News did not label or intend for the story to be satire; they were just too dumb to know that the story was satire and never checked a source. My guess is that they know the story wasn't true to begin with, and if that is the case it was a lie If they actually thought the story was true and failed to do any background check then it makes them the worst, untrustworthy news source around. Doesn't really matter which, it just proves that Fox News is unreliable and can't be trusted. And no, no other network fell for that second item. What they reported was that Fox fell for this story. Feel free to post a link that any of the sources you mention actually fell for this satire story, but I've never seen it. Back up you words here, otherwise I will just consider this another of your lies.
[Edited on 2/14/2015 by 2112]
Based on the links that Bhawk posted on 2/12, there's obviously a lot of lying taking place
on all the networks. Which source can be trusted? None. There's a niche that's dying to
be filled and someone could make a fortune.
Based on the links that Bhawk posted on 2/12, there's obviously a lot of lying taking place
on all the networks. Which source can be trusted? None. There's a niche that's dying to
be filled and someone could make a fortune.
If you were to follow the links and see what the lies/exaggerations/misinformation was on each network, you might change your mind. Degree of lies and quantity matter.
Based on the links that Bhawk posted on 2/12, there's obviously a lot of lying taking place
on all the networks. Which source can be trusted? None. There's a niche that's dying to
be filled and someone could make a fortune.If you were to follow the links and see what the lies/exaggerations/misinformation was on each network, you might change your mind. Degree of lies and quantity matter.
___________________________________________________________________
Exactly right.
Degree of lies and quantity do matter.
Example: obama said if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor.
obama said of you like your plan, you can keep your plan.
obama said the average family would save $2,500 a year
All of which were bold faced lies and has put a huge burdon on the middle class.
Based on the links that Bhawk posted on 2/12, there's obviously a lot of lying taking place
on all the networks. Which source can be trusted? None. There's a niche that's dying to
be filled and someone could make a fortune.If you were to follow the links and see what the lies/exaggerations/misinformation was on each network, you might change your mind. Degree of lies and quantity matter.
___________________________________________________________________
Exactly right.
Degree of lies and quantity do matter.Example: obama said if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor.
obama said of you like your plan, you can keep your plan.
obama said the average family would save $2,500 a yearAll of which were bold faced lies and has put a huge burdon on the middle class.
You convinced me. I'm never voting for him again!
Kept my doctor, kept my plan, and saved more than $2500 by being able to keep my 3 kids on my plan after they graduated college - Damn that Obama! 😛
I think what Williams did is reprehensible. But shouldn't Bush and Reagan be held to the same standards concerning the lies they told about their service?
http://www.juancole.com/2015/02/williams-military-records.html
Williams Affair: Reagan and Bush Lied about Military Records but Get a Pass
By Juan Cole | Feb. 6, 2015 |
NBC nightly news anchor Brian Williams is under fire for repeatedly having told an embellished story of being in a Chinook helicopter that took RPG and small arms fire at the beginning of the Iraq War and was forced down. His critics, and military personnel present on the four helicopters then flying in a convoy or nearby, largely dispute his account, saying Williams arrived an hour after the Chinook that had been forced down. One eyewitness did confirm to CNN that the helicopter he and Williams were on took AK 47 fire (he is contradicted by his colleagues). Williams has in any case withdrawn the anecdote, though he played down how often he had told it.
Williams’ critics accuse him of just making stuff up, and for all I know he did. But we all know that stories grow in the telling, and it isn’t impossible that over time Williams’ memory played tricks on him. If his helicopter did in fact take some light arms fire, as a soldier present on it alleges, that is a kernel of experience for Williams’s later faulty memory. It is also suggested that the story of what happened to the lead Chinook was broadcast inside Williams’s own helicopter and that he may have lived it vicariously and then over time inserted himself into the story.
In any case, those who haven’t risked their lives in a war zone (which is what Williams did) maybe shouldn’t be so glib in condemning someone who did. His story is false; the danger was real. The anger and feeling of betrayal of the military personnel on the helicopter that was hit, on the other hand, is understandable, though at least one of them says he is ready to move on.
Many of Williams’s fiercest critics are conservatives, for whom network television news is a liberal conspiracy– a charge that is wholly unfair and untrue (otherwise we on the left wouldn’t risk a stroke every time we watch it). Worse, many of them think that Fox Cable News really is fair and balanced.
The same conservatives, however, go on idolizing Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush, both of whom much more egregiously made stuff up about their military service than Williams (who never claimed to be more than a hapless civilian). The same voices that allege that Williams has been deprived of credibility by the incidents would never dream of impugning the credibility of the lying GOP presidents.
Ronald Reagan told visiting Israeli premier Yitzhak Shamir in fall of 1983 that he had helped liberate the Auschwitz concentration camp as a soldier in the European theater and had taken footage of the horrors of the camp. Later, he said, when family members questioned him as to whether those horrors had really occurred, he showed them the footage he had captured. He also told a version of this story to Simon Wiesenthal. Dan Meridor confirmed to journalist Lou Cannon that Reagan had made these assertions, and said that Shamir relayed them to the Israeli cabinet to demonstrate Reagan’s sympathy for the Jewish people.
Reagan was in uniform during WW II, but was detailed to Hollywood. He never left the United States. He sometimes maintained that he had access to classified US Army footage of the concentration camps because of his film work during the war. But Cannon shows that Gen. Eisenhower had ordered these reels shown in movie theaters in the US in 1945 and that they weren’t secret or classified at all. Reagan later denied to Cannon that he had told Shamir and Wiesenthal that story, but there isn’t much doubt that he did.
Reagan had an over-active imagination and seems sometimes to have remembered himself right into movies or newsreels he had seen. Whether he was already showing Alzheimer symptoms in 1983 (which would be scary) isn’t clear, but the problem anyway doesn’t seem to have been one of forgetting things but rather of remembering other people’s experiences as his own. Cannon, in his biography of Reagan, made allowances in a footnote, saying that “Reagan became so emotionally engrossed in the story that he told it from the point of view of the photographer witnessing the scene.”
Surely one could, if one wanted to, charitably suggest the same thing of Brian Williams. But those who most admire Reagan are the least likely to be even-handed here.
The great Joe Conason sleuthed out George W. Bush’s lies about his military service. Bush avoided Vietnam by using family connections to get assigned to the Texas Air National Guard. Many of the soldiers who died in the jungles were too poor to afford college or had no family connections (Dick Cheney took five college deferrals). The wealthy power elite could avoid service if they wanted to. Conason writes,
“In his 2000 campaign autobiography, ghosted by Karen Hughes, Bush claimed that after completing his training in the F-102 fighter plane, “I continued flying with my unit for the next several years.” That simple sentence was entirely untrue . . .”
In fact, George went AWOL and in a fair world would have been disciplined and sent off to Nam and disqualified from high public office. He was supposed to have a physical in 1972. He did not show up for it, and then just went off to work on the Alabama senate campaign of Winton “Red” Blount (where he was remembered as lazy, drunk and a boastful of his serial sexual conquests). He was in the military! Didn’t his commanding officer care where he was?
According to the Salon piece, Bush told a newspaper in the ’90s, “I don’t want to play like I was somebody out there marching [to war] when I wasn’t. It was either Canada or the service and I was headed into the service.”
Conason points out that in the Hughes-ghosted book, Bush instead asserted that “he tried to volunteer for service in Vietnam ‘to relieve active duty pilots’ fighting the war.” He of course had done no such thing, but rather had used the Texas Air National Guard to relieve himself of any “service.” And he had already admitted as much publicly, but lied in the book, which was intended to pave the way to the presidency.
So Bush lied about trying to volunteer for Vietnam (!) and then lied again when he said he “continued flying with my unit” when in reality he was sloughing off on a civilian local GOP campaign in another state and carousing about all hours instead of getting up for reveille.
So I’ll take conservative caviling at Williams seriously (however much it might be deserved on the facts of the matter) seriously only when they also denounce Reagan and Bush for their much more egregious war service lies and agree that those figures lack credibility and should stop being looked up to.
—–
I think what Williams did is reprehensible. But shouldn't Bush and Reagan be held to the same standards concerning the lies they told about their service?
http://www.juancole.com/2015/02/williams-military-records.html
Williams Affair: Reagan and Bush Lied about Military Records but Get a Pass
By Juan Cole | Feb. 6, 2015 |NBC nightly news anchor Brian Williams is under fire for repeatedly having told an embellished story of being in a Chinook helicopter that took RPG and small arms fire at the beginning of the Iraq War and was forced down. His critics, and military personnel present on the four helicopters then flying in a convoy or nearby, largely dispute his account, saying Williams arrived an hour after the Chinook that had been forced down. One eyewitness did confirm to CNN that the helicopter he and Williams were on took AK 47 fire (he is contradicted by his colleagues). Williams has in any case withdrawn the anecdote, though he played down how often he had told it.
Williams’ critics accuse him of just making stuff up, and for all I know he did. But we all know that stories grow in the telling, and it isn’t impossible that over time Williams’ memory played tricks on him. If his helicopter did in fact take some light arms fire, as a soldier present on it alleges, that is a kernel of experience for Williams’s later faulty memory. It is also suggested that the story of what happened to the lead Chinook was broadcast inside Williams’s own helicopter and that he may have lived it vicariously and then over time inserted himself into the story.
In any case, those who haven’t risked their lives in a war zone (which is what Williams did) maybe shouldn’t be so glib in condemning someone who did. His story is false; the danger was real. The anger and feeling of betrayal of the military personnel on the helicopter that was hit, on the other hand, is understandable, though at least one of them says he is ready to move on.
Many of Williams’s fiercest critics are conservatives, for whom network television news is a liberal conspiracy– a charge that is wholly unfair and untrue (otherwise we on the left wouldn’t risk a stroke every time we watch it). Worse, many of them think that Fox Cable News really is fair and balanced.
The same conservatives, however, go on idolizing Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush, both of whom much more egregiously made stuff up about their military service than Williams (who never claimed to be more than a hapless civilian). The same voices that allege that Williams has been deprived of credibility by the incidents would never dream of impugning the credibility of the lying GOP presidents.Ronald Reagan told visiting Israeli premier Yitzhak Shamir in fall of 1983 that he had helped liberate the Auschwitz concentration camp as a soldier in the European theater and had taken footage of the horrors of the camp. Later, he said, when family members questioned him as to whether those horrors had really occurred, he showed them the footage he had captured. He also told a version of this story to Simon Wiesenthal. Dan Meridor confirmed to journalist Lou Cannon that Reagan had made these assertions, and said that Shamir relayed them to the Israeli cabinet to demonstrate Reagan’s sympathy for the Jewish people.
Reagan was in uniform during WW II, but was detailed to Hollywood. He never left the United States. He sometimes maintained that he had access to classified US Army footage of the concentration camps because of his film work during the war. But Cannon shows that Gen. Eisenhower had ordered these reels shown in movie theaters in the US in 1945 and that they weren’t secret or classified at all. Reagan later denied to Cannon that he had told Shamir and Wiesenthal that story, but there isn’t much doubt that he did.
Reagan had an over-active imagination and seems sometimes to have remembered himself right into movies or newsreels he had seen. Whether he was already showing Alzheimer symptoms in 1983 (which would be scary) isn’t clear, but the problem anyway doesn’t seem to have been one of forgetting things but rather of remembering other people’s experiences as his own. Cannon, in his biography of Reagan, made allowances in a footnote, saying that “Reagan became so emotionally engrossed in the story that he told it from the point of view of the photographer witnessing the scene.”
Surely one could, if one wanted to, charitably suggest the same thing of Brian Williams. But those who most admire Reagan are the least likely to be even-handed here.
The great Joe Conason sleuthed out George W. Bush’s lies about his military service. Bush avoided Vietnam by using family connections to get assigned to the Texas Air National Guard. Many of the soldiers who died in the jungles were too poor to afford college or had no family connections (Dick Cheney took five college deferrals). The wealthy power elite could avoid service if they wanted to. Conason writes,
“In his 2000 campaign autobiography, ghosted by Karen Hughes, Bush claimed that after completing his training in the F-102 fighter plane, “I continued flying with my unit for the next several years.” That simple sentence was entirely untrue . . .”In fact, George went AWOL and in a fair world would have been disciplined and sent off to Nam and disqualified from high public office. He was supposed to have a physical in 1972. He did not show up for it, and then just went off to work on the Alabama senate campaign of Winton “Red” Blount (where he was remembered as lazy, drunk and a boastful of his serial sexual conquests). He was in the military! Didn’t his commanding officer care where he was?
According to the Salon piece, Bush told a newspaper in the ’90s, “I don’t want to play like I was somebody out there marching [to war] when I wasn’t. It was either Canada or the service and I was headed into the service.”Conason points out that in the Hughes-ghosted book, Bush instead asserted that “he tried to volunteer for service in Vietnam ‘to relieve active duty pilots’ fighting the war.” He of course had done no such thing, but rather had used the Texas Air National Guard to relieve himself of any “service.” And he had already admitted as much publicly, but lied in the book, which was intended to pave the way to the presidency.
So Bush lied about trying to volunteer for Vietnam (!) and then lied again when he said he “continued flying with my unit” when in reality he was sloughing off on a civilian local GOP campaign in another state and carousing about all hours instead of getting up for reveille.
So I’ll take conservative caviling at Williams seriously (however much it might be deserved on the facts of the matter) seriously only when they also denounce Reagan and Bush for their much more egregious war service lies and agree that those figures lack credibility and should stop being looked up to.
—–
______________________________________________________________________
In your effort to trash two great American Presidents you post a hack piece from a far-left website?
Desperation has sent you over the edge.
Typical conservative - attack the source, not the material......... 😛
Typical conservative - attack the source, not the material......... 😛
__________________________________________________________________
Okay, since the liberals say the source doesn’t matter; here is some material for y'all:
http://www.westernjournalism.com/ten-of-barack-obamas-worst-lies/#VuitywoAJR0y2qtW.97
http://www.theobamafile.com/_lies/LiesIndex.htm
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2015/02/09/where_s_the_outrage_over_obama_s_lies
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/tim-brown/252-examples-of-obamas-lying-lawbreaking-corruption/
http://central-illinoisandbeyond.blogspot.com/2014/01/500-examples-of-obamas-crimes-lies-and.html
In your effort to trash two great American Presidents you post a hack piece from a far-left website?
Desperation has sent you over the edge.
But you can't cite information that refutes the claims.
FYI it wasn't an effort to trash two "great" American Presidents. I was simply showing a double standard.
In your effort to trash two great American Presidents you post a hack piece from a far-left website?
Desperation has sent you over the edge.
But you can't cite information that refutes the claims.
FYI it wasn't an effort to trash two "great" American Presidents. I was simply showing a double standard.
____________________________________________________________
Trying to refute false claims is like watching a liberal spit into the wind.
It is funny though.
Trying to refute false claims is like watching a liberal spit into the wind.
It is funny though.
Do you mean you can't prove a negative? Do you know what you mean? A falsehood can easily be disproven. People do that all the time with the pablum you post.
Typical low info right wing wacko. Spoon fed lies of gruel then self righteously puking it out as if the lies were fact.
Typical low info right wing wacko. Spoon fed lies of gruel then self righteously puking it out as if the lies were fact.
"Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover..... that there are other views".
William F. Buckley, Jr.
Typical low info right wing wacko. Spoon fed lies of gruel then self righteously puking it out as if the lies were fact.
"Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover..... that there are other views".
William F. Buckley, Jr.
Change "Liberals" to "Conservatives" and you could be describing a Fox News viewer. 😛
"Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover..... that there are other views".
William F. Buckley, Jr.
I've been following Muleman for awhile BigV. I don't know if you want to hitch your wagon to his star.
I guess you do. When you paint with that fat a brush you don't care how much you splatter. 😉
[Edited on 2/16/2015 by BillyBlastoff]
"Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover..... that there are other views".
William F. Buckley, Jr.
I've been following Muleman for awhile BigV. I don't know if you want to hitch your wagon to his star.
I guess you do. When you paint with that fat a brush you don't care how much you splatter. 😉
[Edited on 2/16/2015 by BillyBlastoff]
____________________________________________________________
Thank little billy for your usual contribution to the thread.
Do you ever have an actual thought on the subject at hand?
"Liberals claim to want to give a hearing to other views, but then are shocked and offended to discover..... that there are other views".
William F. Buckley, Jr.
I've been following Muleman for awhile BigV. I don't know if you want to hitch your wagon to his star.
I guess you do. When you paint with that fat a brush you don't care how much you splatter. 😉
[Edited on 2/16/2015 by BillyBlastoff]
I'm not "hitching my wagon" to anyone's star; reading through this thread is just down right funny and the Liberal/Conservative argument is just so .....well, neener neener. Btw, Brian Williams' inability to distinguish truth from fiction makes him a huge liar in my book and liars are found in every facet of the media.
