That's right. For those who have said Trump and his mouth could get us into big trouble with international heads of state, and even brings us into nuclear war, well the North Korean leader likes him and says he could unify Korea. He even looks forward to meeting with him holding "direct talks". It's going to get interesting. Imagine a President who does not want to fight in wars unless someone comes to our shores and starts it up here.
"North Korean state media has praised US presidential hopeful Donald Trump, describing him as a “wise politician” and “far-sighted candidate” who could help unify the Korean peninsula.
An editorial in DPRK Today, an official media outlet, welcomed the Republican presidential candidate’s proposal to hold direct talks with Kim Jong-un, saying he could help bring about Pyongyang’s “Yankee go home” policy.
[Edited on 6/1/2016 by gina]
Quite possibly "The Hill" asked him to say that so those who immigrated from Korea would jump on her bandwagon. To make every vote count, for her.
The fact that Putin and Kim Jong Un are the only two international leaders to like Trump really says all you need to know about the man. Are there any other mentally ill, power hungry leaders out there? If so I'm sure they will be throwing their support behind The Donald soon. They all like to stick together.
The fact that Putin and Kim Jong Un are the only two international leaders to like Trump really says all you need to know about the man. Are there any other mentally ill, power hungry leaders out there? If so I'm sure they will be throwing their support behind The Donald soon. They all like to stick together.
Probably less about comradery and more about enjoying watching the USA go down the toilet under a weak and divisive leader.
You're right. They're hoping to see their top rival collapse in front of their eyes.
The fact that Putin and Kim Jong Un are the only two international leaders to like Trump really says all you need to know about the man. Are there any other mentally ill, power hungry leaders out there? If so I'm sure they will be throwing their support behind The Donald soon. They all like to stick together.
They are two of the biggest threats to the US (other than China) because of their nuclear weapons and longstanding dislike of the US and her foreign policies. It is interesting that two of the world leaders regarded as most difficult, like and want to work with Trump, who those in political circles in the US feel is one of the most difficult people. Maybe they all know something the others do not, like NON INTERVENTIONALISM is the gateway to peace. Kim Jong Un and Putin want to talk with Trump and work out deals with him. Hillary has only been Obama's envoy, and for the 'if we don't care of this' we could end up in a war negotiations, he always sends John Kerry, a Bostonian diplomat who will mind his manners and get tough, but be fair.
None of the world leaders have said they want to work with Hillary, except of course the Saudis because of our longstanding oil deals.
The only problem with Trump and that half of the world is, he said it on an interview with Bill O'Reilly, that the US should go there, take the oil and keep the oil. Now the others may plan on doing that also but they will not say it flat out as he has. I think the oil should remain under the custody of the land, people it is found in.
The fact that Putin and Kim Jong Un are the only two international leaders to like Trump really says all you need to know about the man. Are there any other mentally ill, power hungry leaders out there? If so I'm sure they will be throwing their support behind The Donald soon. They all like to stick together.
They are two of the biggest threats to the US (other than China) because of their nuclear weapons and longstanding dislike of the US and her foreign policies. It is interesting that two of the world leaders regarded as most difficult, like and want to work with Trump, who those in political circles in the US feel is one of the most difficult people. Maybe they all know something the others do not, like NON INTERVENTIONALISM is the gateway to peace. Kim Jong Un and Putin want to talk with Trump and work out deals with him. Hillary has only been Obama's envoy, and for the 'if we don't care of this' we could end up in a war negotiations, he always sends John Kerry, a Bostonian diplomat who will mind his manners and get tough, but be fair.
None of the world leaders have said they want to work with Hillary, except of course the Saudis because of our longstanding oil deals.
The only problem with Trump and that half of the world is, he said it on an interview with Bill O'Reilly, that the US should go there, take the oil and keep the oil. Now the others may plan on doing that also but they will not say it flat out as he has. I think the oil should remain under the custody of the land, people it is found in.
I think I'd like to see a president in office that our enemies fear and respect that has the best interest of the American people in mind, not one that our enemies want in office because they think that they can get what they want because he is a little crazy in the head.
I don't think that they think is is crazy in the head. He wants what they want, that we stay out of the business of other countries, IF they attacks us, then we react, but otherwise, we don't get involved in border wars or anything else. We stay home, mind our own business, just like they do. We do good trade deals and our economy benefits and so do theirs. That is the common ground.
All the leaders with nukes know what mutual assured destruction means, and that is the end result in a nuclear war, nobody wins, everybody dies. They know that, so do we. Trump is not launching nukes on any of those countries, NOR them on us. Other potential leaders who might provoke Iran or China could lead us into those wars because other leaders think we need to be involved in the affairs of other countries = our allies and global partners.
I'll tell you this, the newly appointed head of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan Taliban is a religious scholar Haibatullah Akkundzada. Growing up he emigrated with his family to a refugee camp when the wars were going on. His Father and Grandfather are scholars, he has trained others in at least ten madrassas (the Islamic version of a religious seminary) in Balochistan. Balochistan is in Pakistan. Pakistan is a nuclear armed country. The US and Saudis want the oil in Balochistan. NOW, someone who believes the US needs to be involved in the affairs of other countries with our allied, strategic partners could lead us into a war, that destabilized Pakistan, forcing the US to demand that WE take over their nuclear arsenal. What do you think the reaction from the Afghan Taliban as well as the others from Pakistan will be when that happens? I think the Zindabad, the Pakistani Army and all the other groups would united against the US.
WAR - Nuclear War.
What would Trump do? Would he be ruthless and kill thousands of civilians to get the oil, take down the governments of both countries? I don't think so. As a non-interventionalist, his position should be let Pakistan run their own war, secure their own borders. If the Afghan govt. can't hold it's own, we need to consider if we need to leave a force there forever. If the Afghan Taliban come back into power over the country, is it our business to take them out of power? They are native born Afghans, don't they have a right to practice their religion in their own land as they see fit? If we take them out of power or obliterate them completely, ISIS will step in. ISIS will not confine themselves to the borders of just one country. They want total world domination, the same as the new world order neocons.
So the war is really between ISIS and the New World Order. Everyone else who is not willing to give an oath to either of these groups is just going to be collateral damage wherever they are fighting each other.
KEY POINT: If each country prevents ISIS from taking over their sovereign state/borders, ISIS is not a threat.
The US going in to take out Assad, arming the Syrian Free Army and others created the problem that exists today. Assad would have dealt with ISIS. Russia just bombed four of the Isis oil fields in Raqqa yesterday. They would not have those fields IF the US did not get involved in the affairs of other countries.
Trumps position is respect the sovereign borders of other countries. The others want something else.
[Edited on 6/5/2016 by gina]
RUSSIA SAYS US REFUSES TO TALK WITH THEM ON MISSILE DEFENSE
MOSCOW: The United States has refused Russian offers to discuss Washington's missile defence programme, Russian Deputy Defence Minister Anatoly Antonov was quoted as saying on Sunday, calling the initiative "very dangerous".
Russian President Vladimir Putin last month warned Romania and Poland that they could find themselves in the sights of Russian rockets because they are hosting elements of the missile shield that Moscow considers a threat to its security. Addressing a forum in Singapore, Antonov said the U.S.-backed project was creating problems for both Russia and China, complaining that Moscow had many times called on the United States to rethink its plans, the Interfax news agency reported.
"We have offered them cooperation many times and found ways we could solve the situation ... But we did not manage to convince them to continue dialogue on this issue. As I understand it, now is not the best time for them to hold consultations," Antonov said. He did not elaborate. The United States is in the middle of a presidential election campaign ahead of a Nov. 8 vote. The U.S. military -- which says the shield is needed to protect the United States and European allies from Iran, not threaten Russia -- switched on the Romanian part of the shield last month. Work is going ahead on another part of the shield, in Poland. "It is very dangerous when one country secures its own security at the expense of other countries' security," Antonov was quoted as saying by Interfax.
REMARKS: Putin wants to talk and work with Trump. Can we afford the same policy we have now, that Hillary will continue?
[Edited on 6/5/2016 by gina]
