Don't click or your IP will be banned


Hittin' The Web with the Allman Brothers Band Forum
You are not logged in

< Last Thread   Next Thread ><<  1    2    3  >>Ascending sortDescending sorting  
Author: Subject: PLEASE READ: Personal Attacks Will Result in a Ban

Zen Peach



Karma:
Posts: 21486
(21546 all sites)
Registered: 2/9/2006
Status: Offline

  posted on 1/23/2019 at 01:29 AM
quote:
In all seriousness, I'm simply saying that I don't think this rule will stop any personal attacks, if that is the goal. Just today I've seen the phrase "only an IDIOT would think that", because technically, the writer didn't namecall a member of the site. Just my humble opinion, as a fan of the site.

[Edited on 10/26/2018 by BoytonBrother]


----------------------------------------------------------------------

quote:
Prove an opinion? Boy, you really are dumb. Look no further than your above quote. You openly dislike liberals, and donít even understand why that makes you a bigot.


quote:
itís just that you are a pompous a$$hole about it


Do these quotes from Boynton Brother qualify as personal attacks?

 

____________________
Funny, the very same people yelling, "Wear a mask"! for the safety of others are the very same people from whom we hear nary a whimper about the riots.

 

Zen Peach



Karma:
Posts: 21486
(21546 all sites)
Registered: 2/9/2006
Status: Offline

  posted on 2/3/2019 at 01:04 AM
quote:
I think this thread proves once and for all what a complete jackass BIGV truly is.


How about this one?

 

____________________
Funny, the very same people yelling, "Wear a mask"! for the safety of others are the very same people from whom we hear nary a whimper about the riots.

 

Zen Peach



Karma:
Posts: 21486
(21546 all sites)
Registered: 2/9/2006
Status: Offline

  posted on 2/3/2019 at 08:16 AM
quote:
Or is it possible this is simply the drivel of a low IQ prejudice idiot?

 

____________________
Funny, the very same people yelling, "Wear a mask"! for the safety of others are the very same people from whom we hear nary a whimper about the riots.

 

True Peach



Karma:
Posts: 13967
(14221 all sites)
Registered: 2/10/2005
Status: Offline

  posted on 2/5/2019 at 06:27 PM
quote:
quote:
Or is it possible this is simply the drivel of a low IQ prejudice idiot?



Isn't it "prejudiced"? Or " prejudicial"?

 

World Class Peach



Karma:
Posts: 5032
(5027 all sites)
Registered: 12/27/2003
Status: Offline

  posted on 2/5/2019 at 10:18 PM
I think you are right.....ĒprejudicedĒ is the correct form. Good catch!
 

True Peach



Karma:
Posts: 13967
(14221 all sites)
Registered: 2/10/2005
Status: Offline

  posted on 2/6/2019 at 07:26 AM
quote:
I think you are right.....ĒprejudicedĒ is the correct form. Good catch!


I majored in Literature.

 

Zen Peach



Karma:
Posts: 21486
(21546 all sites)
Registered: 2/9/2006
Status: Offline

  posted on 2/8/2019 at 08:30 PM
quote:
You are one low-rent, no shame individual. You attack political affiliation, profession, and now a womanís physical characteristics. Get off this site with your trash.


Yet another personal attack from Boynton Brother

 

____________________
Funny, the very same people yelling, "Wear a mask"! for the safety of others are the very same people from whom we hear nary a whimper about the riots.

 

Extreme Peach



Karma:
Posts: 1584
(1584 all sites)
Registered: 11/8/2008
Status: Offline

  posted on 2/9/2019 at 10:11 AM
Do you not understand how this works??????

Quit the personal attacks or you will be gone.

Haven't you noticed some nasty posters are MIA? Never to return? Rowland isn't kidding. If you have any interest in continuing to have the privilege to post, stick to the point & not the playground.

 

World Class Peach



Karma:
Posts: 5032
(5027 all sites)
Registered: 12/27/2003
Status: Offline

  posted on 2/20/2019 at 01:49 PM
I truly hope I never get banned, because I love coming to this site, and I think Rowland does a fantastic job running it, and being the ring leader of the Whipping Post section.

But it seems like it's ok to make personal attacks against public figures, even if they are good people who have done nothing wrong. It seems like it's ok to attack the women of the #metoo movement (gender), age (millenials), and political affiliation......all of which are protected from discrimination in our Constitution. But if I respond by attacking the behavior of that person committing the discrimination, then it results in a ban? I sure hope not.

If someone wants to come here to be provocative and insult, then they should expect to get it right back. This notion that someone can attack a public figure, and then be protected from someone responding in kind, is simply illogical, and not something I can do.

I hope Rowland amends the policy, so that it requires him to examine all of the context surrounding the comments. If there is a nasty personal attack out of the blue, then yes, ban them. But if the "personal attack" is in response to something provocative, then I hope Rowland would decide that there is no violation, since the poster was looking for a rise out of people.

Just my 2 cents. I wanted to make that statement so that if I do get banned, yall will know exactly why. Hope to see you all in the forum!

 

True Peach



Karma:
Posts: 13967
(14221 all sites)
Registered: 2/10/2005
Status: Offline

  posted on 2/22/2019 at 06:09 AM
All the dude is suggesting is we here at this site not call each other names. Y'know, like we learned in freakin' kindergarten.
 

World Class Peach



Karma:
Posts: 5032
(5027 all sites)
Registered: 12/27/2003
Status: Offline

  posted on 2/22/2019 at 06:28 AM
quote:
All the dude is suggesting is we here at this site not call each other names. Y'know, like we learned in freakin' kindergarten.


Ok, so weíll all attack each other without name-calling, and problem solved? Please.

 

True Peach



Karma:
Posts: 13967
(14221 all sites)
Registered: 2/10/2005
Status: Offline

  posted on 2/22/2019 at 07:46 AM
quote:
I truly hope I never get banned, because I love coming to this site, and I think Rowland does a fantastic job running it, and being the ring leader of the Whipping Post section.

But it seems like it's ok to make personal attacks against public figures, even if they are good people who have done nothing wrong. It seems like it's ok to attack the women of the #metoo movement (gender), age (millenials), and political affiliation......all of which are protected from discrimination in our Constitution. But if I respond by attacking the behavior of that person committing the discrimination, then it results in a ban? I sure hope not.

If someone wants to come here to be provocative and insult, then they should expect to get it right back. This notion that someone can attack a public figure, and then be protected from someone responding in kind, is simply illogical, and not something I can do.

I hope Rowland amends the policy, so that it requires him to examine all of the context surrounding the comments. If there is a nasty personal attack out of the blue, then yes, ban them. But if the "personal attack" is in response to something provocative, then I hope Rowland would decide that there is no violation, since the poster was looking for a rise out of people.

Just my 2 cents. I wanted to make that statement so that if I do get banned, yall will know exactly why. Hope to see you all in the forum!


You probably should've just pm-ed this to Rowland and spared us the sniffles.

 

World Class Peach



Karma:
Posts: 5032
(5027 all sites)
Registered: 12/27/2003
Status: Offline

  posted on 2/22/2019 at 08:21 AM
Take it however you like. It was in response to a PM I received. The point Iím trying to make to everyone, hence the post here, is to offer another way to improve the forum - by going after the ones provoking trouble. Sorry to offer a suggestion.
 

True Peach



Karma:
Posts: 13967
(14221 all sites)
Registered: 2/10/2005
Status: Offline

  posted on 2/22/2019 at 09:34 AM
It's all good dude.
 

Zen Peach



Karma:
Posts: 21486
(21546 all sites)
Registered: 2/9/2006
Status: Offline

  posted on 4/9/2019 at 09:25 AM
quote:
No, itís an outlet for YOU because you canít express your bigotry in public because of the shame and rejection youíd receive. Itís pretty easy for me to call Trump a dirty scum bag in public. Racists donít have this freedom, and it REALLY bugs them.


Boynton Brother

 

____________________
Funny, the very same people yelling, "Wear a mask"! for the safety of others are the very same people from whom we hear nary a whimper about the riots.

 

Zen Peach



Karma:
Posts: 21486
(21546 all sites)
Registered: 2/9/2006
Status: Offline

  posted on 4/9/2019 at 09:34 AM
quote:
You are doing a lot of laughing at people. Only an insecure passive-aggressive jacka$$ does this.


quote:
Itís your ignorant, low rent, childish manner in which you present them


quote:
I think I get BIGVís point. It took me a while because of how childish and demented it is


quote:
If by "chuckle" you mean "being a complete jerk to people based on their political affiliation", then yes, you "chuckle".


quote:
Are you ever not a jerk towards Democrats? Grow up already.


 

____________________
Funny, the very same people yelling, "Wear a mask"! for the safety of others are the very same people from whom we hear nary a whimper about the riots.

 

World Class Peach



Karma:
Posts: 5032
(5027 all sites)
Registered: 12/27/2003
Status: Offline

  posted on 4/9/2019 at 09:35 AM
I never called you anything, but you included yourself in that last line.

Dude, stop tattling to Rowland. Iím sure he has better things to do. Handle it yourself. You are not a victim if you come to the site to fight and argue and ďlaugh yourself to sleepĒ.

[Edited on 4/9/2019 by BoytonBrother]

 

World Class Peach



Karma:
Posts: 5032
(5027 all sites)
Registered: 12/27/2003
Status: Offline

  posted on 4/9/2019 at 09:42 AM
I donít see personal attacks in any of those examples.



[Edited on 4/9/2019 by BoytonBrother]

 

Zen Peach



Karma:
Posts: 16027
(16019 all sites)
Registered: 10/13/2007
Status: Offline

  posted on 5/5/2019 at 09:48 PM

Having to resort to comments about perceived behavior and/or personality traits of your debate opponent.... probably means you're LOSING.

 

A Peach Supreme



Karma:
Posts: 2663
(2663 all sites)
Registered: 11/5/2002
Status: Offline

  posted on 5/9/2019 at 05:05 PM
I just saw this thread for the first time today. I got used to ignoring the "Topped Threads". I should probably go delete some of my earlier posts.

I like it though. I do wish BigV would provide dates with his examples though. As I am reading through all of them I kept asking myself, "I Wonder when that was?"

 

____________________
"With the help of God and true friends I've come to realize,
I still have two strong legs and even wings to fly"

 

Peach Master



Karma:
Posts: 634
(634 all sites)
Registered: 1/11/2003
Status: Offline

  posted on 9/17/2019 at 06:16 PM
May I ask what means members have to block and/or ignore those we find most offensive?
I don't wanna be tempted any longer by the dumbass demographic in our fine populace.
Please advise...Thanks!

 

Zen Peach



Karma:
Posts: 21486
(21546 all sites)
Registered: 2/9/2006
Status: Offline

  posted on 9/18/2019 at 02:09 AM
quote:
most offensive?


Please define further....


Thanks

 

True Peach



Karma:
Posts: 13967
(14221 all sites)
Registered: 2/10/2005
Status: Offline

  posted on 9/18/2019 at 04:58 AM
quote:
quote:
most offensive?


Please define further....


Thanks


Patriots fans.

 

True Peach



Karma:
Posts: 13967
(14221 all sites)
Registered: 2/10/2005
Status: Offline

  posted on 9/18/2019 at 04:59 AM

 

Zen Peach



Karma:
Posts: 16339
(16343 all sites)
Registered: 9/24/2003
Status: Offline

  posted on 3/9/2020 at 12:09 PM
I suggest doing the adult thing. Call the person(s) out by name and the specific post and have the community, being board members and the alleged perpetrator discuss the actual post. Intent, context, and motive can be misconstrued easily by those quick to take offense at everything. Complaining to the authoritative person with generalizations is not the way to approach finding a solution. Comments are very subjective, what is offensive to one isn't to another.

My .02

Laterz

 

____________________

 
<<  1    2    3  >>  


Powered by XForum 1.81.1 by Trollix Software

Privacy | Terms of Service | Report Infringement | Personal Data Management | Contact Us
The ALLMAN BROTHERS BAND name, The ALLMAN BROTHERS name, likenesses, logos, mushroom design and peach truck are all registered trademarks of THE ABB MERCHANDISING CO., INC. whose rights are specifically reserved. Any artwork, visual, or audio representations used on this web site CONTAINING ANY REGISTERED TRADEMARKS are under license from The ABB MERCHANDISING CO., INC. A REVOCABLE, GRATIS LICENSE IS GRANTED TO ALL REGISTERED PEACH CORP MEMBERS FOR The DOWNLOADING OF ONE COPY FOR PERSONAL USE ONLY. ANY DISTRIBUTION OR REPRODUCTION OF THE TRADEMARKS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE PROHIBITED AND ARE SPECIFICALLY RESERVED BY THE ABB MERCHANDISING CO.,INC.
site by Hittin' the Web Group with www.experiencewasabi3d.com