Don't click or your IP will be banned


Hittin' The Web with the Allman Brothers Band Forum
You are not logged in

< Last Thread   Next Thread ><<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>Ascending sortDescending sorting  
Author: Subject: Trump

Peach Extraordinaire



Karma:
Posts: 4924
(4919 all sites)
Registered: 12/27/2003
Status: Offline

  posted on 3/1/2016 at 04:19 PM
quote:
Have you seen the photo of Hillary kissing Robert Byrd. This is not in the news at all but wasn't he in the same category as Duke . The media is sure focusing on one and not the other.


So then you are admitting that you oppose her relationship with Byrd because of his racist past? I do too. She should've known better, and because of these flubs among the others, she will not get my vote. Will you acknowledge the same about Trump's flubs and cast your vote elsewhere? Probably not. Why make excuses for either?

 

Ultimate Peach



Karma:
Posts: 3947
(3953 all sites)
Registered: 10/5/2004
Status: Offline

  posted on 3/1/2016 at 05:09 PM
quote:
I'll admit that after hearing Hillary debate, she is incredibly disappointing. Not a sincere word yet if you ask me. Just sounds phony 100% of the time, which only makes her sound like she is hiding something. I want Bernie, but I don't see how he has any chance at all, so I'm hoping Rubio gets it.

[Edited on 3/1/2016 by BoytonBrother]


You've pretty much labeled most politicians in your first three sentences. Bernie & possibly Kasich to a smaller degree may be exceptions. Carson not worth mentioning because he's not a politician and adds zero to the discussion and is a non factor. The rest are pretty much in the same boat of lack of sincerity. We pick the best poison.

BB, I don't how you can make the leap from Bernie to Rubio. Who they are, and what they stand for are miles apart.

 

Peach Extraordinaire



Karma:
Posts: 4133
(4131 all sites)
Registered: 8/26/2006
Status: Offline

  posted on 3/1/2016 at 05:32 PM
Against Donald Trump: Why Evangelicals Must Not Support Trump -

http://mereorthodoxy.com/against-donald-trump-evangelicals/#sthash.xqA4xC1W .dpuf

The rise of Donald Trump among some evangelicals is an understandable, even if unsettling phenomenon. The alienation and despair that he has both fostered and exploited is a pervasive feature of some corners of American life. But no one is more susceptible to such hopelessness about our political class than working-class, rural, white evangelicals, who have been tutored more by the grievance and resentment theater of both conservative and evangelical talk radio than by the good news of the Gospel. As Ben Domenech has astutely explained, having lost every culture war such evangelicals are now fighting on the only terrain they have left: political correctness. And Donald Trump is their gift to the world.

I have relatively deep roots in the conservative evangelical world. In 2007, Justin Taylor and Joe Carter let me join with them in endorsing Mike Huckabee. (I have since grown to regret this.) Unlike many of my more moderate peers, I have publicly defended traditional marriage. I have spoken at the Values Voter Summit. When progressive Christian Rachel Held Evans wanted to find a Christian to explain why they are drawn to political conservatism, she kindly invited me. I have written a cover story and a number of other pieces for Christianity Today. I am unswervingly pro-life and will unflinchingly describe the abortion regime as an American genocide. I think Values and Capitalism is among the best programs in the conservative world.

I have also never written about immigration, but my own views are somewhere between Rubio and Cruz. (This must be said, as it has become a litmus test for evangelical conservatives in this campaign.) I am skeptical of the relaxed immigration policies that many countries in Europe have practiced, but also recognize that America isn’t Europe and that we may be able to sustain and assimilate higher percentages of immigrants than countries with tiny land-masses. Ross Douthat’s ten theses on immigration seem enormously sensible to me. Like many Americans, I think blanket amnesty is a bad idea—and I see no way to deport 12 million people. I have friends and neighbors who are both members of the white underclass and are undocumented immigrants, and see regularly firsthand the challenges both sets face in trying to sustain their way of life.

Born of the tribe of Dobson and inducted into the party of Reagan on the eighth day, I have supported every Republican presidential candidate in my lifetime. And never before have I been more ready to dissolve that union.

If Donald Trump is the Republican nominee, I will not hesitate in abstaining or voting for a third party in November. And neither should you.

——

In January, I compared Donald Trump to Sir John Falstaff, whose debauched and degenerate jollity has long intoxicated audiences with the strange brew of repulsion and mirth. Falstaff is larger than life itself: He somehow stands outside morality, even as he stands outside the political order. But Henry, having deliberately shrouded his character in the stench of vice through his close friendship with Falstaff, knows that the friendship cannot endure in the same way when he assumes the throne: “I will banish thee,” he promises Falstaff in the midst of their revelry. They both know it must be true: The legitimacy of Henry’s rule would be imperiled by his close friendship with the lecher.

Trump is a not simply a charlatan, a huckster, a con-man, though he is all of that. He is also shameless. The more outlandish he is, the more he is rewarded with the only currency he cares about: attention. He has none of the checks or balances that make the rest of us mortals weak and irrelevant. He is T.S. Eliot’s ‘Hollow Man’ come to life: He blows wherever the loves of money, fame, and his indulgent fantasies of being a ‘winner’ will take him. As Joe Carter said recently, his penchants for insults betrays an incredibly insecure mentality, the sort that breeds a harsh authoritarianism at the first whiff of power. Nothing else will matter except maintaining the delusion that Trump is a Winner, Baby: the common good be damned.

Such shamelessness is his greatest asset: It is also one of our political order’s most deadly foes. As Eliot Cohen recently argued, Trump’s debased approach to political life signals a “larger moral and cultural collapse.” While ‘political correctness’ may slowly suffocate meaningful debate and dissent, the festering of an environment where outlandish and disgusting ‘rhetoric’ are rewarded with a party’s nomination will only embolden imitators. (Twitter is full of them, and they are terrible.) And we will be the worse for it: The shame that prompts our politicians to try to wiggle out of being called a ‘liar’ is what, in some instances, will actually prevent them from lying.

The lack of trust between the people and our government is a pernicious social disease that has been growing for a long time. But Trump is not so much a cure for our malaise as a more potent dose of the same venom. A political environment in which the truth is openly mocked, spit upon, and dragged through the streets before the cheering crowds places itself in serious jeopardy, as it reduces political relationships to who wields the instruments of power. If Trump, God and heaven forbid it, were actually to win the office, he would have his reward while the rest of us face la guillotine.

While evangelicals have gravitated to Trump precisely because of his repudiation of the ‘political correctness’ of our day, the brutal irony is that he is its final triumph, its consummation and perfection, its heroic champion…even down to his followers’ technique of shaming and silencing dissenters on Twitter. The reduction of politics to power and the assertion that argument is a cover for bigotry finds its completion in the devil-may-care spectacle that is the Trump campaign. He has persuaded even those who claim for themselves the name of the Gospel that nothing matters besides being told the warm and comforting truth that We Can Be Winners, that the truth is dispensable provided our needs are satisfactorily met. The irrelevancy of truth for the sake of power-relations in Trump’s campaign has transposed ‘political correctness’ into a new, contrarian key: Trump has not left it behind so much as co-opted it for his ends–at least until its purpose is served.

And those who support Trump will be most likely to lose out if he eventually wins. So it has often been for those who have bought into his lies. From Trump’s casinos to Trump University, like the prosperity preachers he emulates Trump has preyed upon the very people he claims to love and support. And why would a President Trump be any different? We have been given no reason why the Newly Converted Conservative Trump will be any better for America than the liberal Hillary Clinton. And no reason can be given because none exists outside of Trump’s most solemn word, a word that his history suggests is as valuable as the degrees from his University. For those drawn to Trump’s policies, on what reasonable basis would you expect him to not sell you out? Because the fearsome power of the Republican Establishment will hold him to account? The same Republican establishment that is now bending to kiss the ring?

T.S. Eliot was not wrong about much, but he was about this: The world may end, but it will not be with a whimper, except from the conservative Republicans who have decided Trump is their only hope for the relevance and influence they crave.

——

There is no conservative argument for Trump. Conservatives once held that virtue and character are essential requirements for a just society, and that a stable marriage and family is among the best way to nurture those virtues. Those virtues, we contended, were essential for ensuring that the market not only operated efficiently, but stayed within its appropriate boundaries. The conservative movement once believed that religion was central to our social fabric, that not everyone had to be religious but that it needed to be afforded due respect and even reverence. Turning religion into a political prop would only cheapen it, and eventually corrode it. The political virtues that conservatives once cared about—temperance and restraint—are now treated (by ‘conservatives’) as the stuff of compromisers and weaklings: “Damn your concern for principles and prudence: We shall have our riots in the streets!”

My depiction of ‘conservatism’ is, admittedly, both nostalgic and not policy-specific. But it gestures at a set of intuitions which have helped me maintain my ties to a party that I have frequently found myself in disagreement with. I have always been happy to be an idealist: Chesterton taught me that it is the only path toward reform. Still, if the Republican party has become so detached from the conservatism that I depicted that it is willing to allow Trump to bear its mantle, it deserves the violent death that it currently faces.

It would be easy to look upon Trump and see him as an outlier in American life. But the Trumpian disregard for the truth and virtue is a cancer that has beset us all: Trump is a candidate for our time, a fitting judgment upon us who magnifies our sins and our vices. He may be a caricature; but he is a parody of us, a morality tale whose meaning we should heed.

But there is a difference between acknowledging the degraded political character of our age and joining with the Visigoths while they tear down the Roman monuments. That the Babylonians were God’s instrument for judgment does not mean the Israelites should have cleaned their swords. If the gods have released the Kraken upon us, shall we join him for tea and crumpets?

The Republican Party Establishment—may they rest in peace—has been leaning toward doing just that. Having failed to even try to stop him, they will now tell us that we are obligated to support him in November. At the moment when Falstaff must be banished, Chris Christie pledged his fealty—and was rewarded most handsomely for it. Hugh Hewitt has begun banging the unity drum. I have long admired him, though he has oft been tempted to prioritize the party over principle.

More will unquestionably come, with cries of “The Court, The Court, The Court!” So the wholesale repudiation of conservative principles by the party pledged to defend them will proceed, washed down by the smooth pragmatic consequentialism that has placed its principles on the altar of urgency. That the party of Lincoln would demand that we support Donald Trump suggests there is no one who might rise the ranks to whom such individuals would say ‘no.’ One might think that such unprincipled weakness is partly what has undermined our country’s respect for the party and given us….Donald Trump. The party leadership has not learned its lesson, but they will have their reward in full: a weekend stay at Mar-a-Lago, which should keep them warm and cozy in their infamy.

I do not despair at the prospects of President Trump: If that is the judgment upon us, then I will meet it with as much good cheer and confidence as I can muster. What tempts me to despair is the number of otherwise sensible people who will capitulate to the shameless huckster to preserve the shreds of their power. Yes, the Supreme Court is important. But if the Republic is in such dire shape that we have to vote for a chronic liar who has knows how to distance himself just enough from the racist underbelly of American life to hold it together, then we should just honestly acknowledge that she is already mortally wounded. This election is about “saving the country,” Hewitt cries, as though all it will take is three Supreme Court justices and a much stronger navy. If the country is imperiled, it is so because of the rot within–the rot that Trump’s overtly race-baiting politics has brought to the surface, and which the Vichy Republicans are currently planning to make terms with.

Besides, Trump’s promises to appoint conservative justices are worth what, exactly? More or less than the Trump University degree? That the next President may appoint three Supreme Court justices is not an argument for voting for Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton. Given Trump’s penchant for telling people what they want to hear for the sake of his own advancement, we need some argument independent of his own words that he will suddenly become trustworthy when he is in office. The entire history of his character bears witness against it.

But I am not convinced it has come to that, because I think there are enough decent, clear-headed men and women left in this country that Donald Trump will never be President. Would that there were more of them within the Party’s leadership.

Trump is the candidate Republicans deserve. But I will not be complicit in their folly. With Erick Erickson, I will never vote for Donald J. Trump. He has neither the character nor the principles to commend him to the office. That this even has to be said is indictment of the world enough. It is an age of high folly when banally obvious truths have to be uttered by ordinary men and women.

The right response now to Donald Trump by any conservative is Erickson’s and Ben Sasse’s: We shall fight on Super Tuesday, we shall fight on the plains of Ohio, we shall fight in Florida, we shall fight with the cheer of knowing we are in the right, we shall fight on the floor of the convention, we shall never join with him. The Republican party may die, but conservatism and its principles will go on and be renewed without it. #NeverTrump. Not now, not ever.

But to that I would add that I may never support a candidate who endorses him, either. Offering support to Trump is such a gross error in judgment that I will be highly skeptical of any politician who lends their aid to place him in the White House. The party simply isn’t worth it. It never was, and as long as it continues to embrace the myth that the Party Matters Above All, it never will be. The only meaningful way to defeat Trumpism permanently is to offer a better politics, a politics rooted in integrity and character and concern for our neighbor, a politics that takes seriously the concerns of Trump’s followers without capitulating to their leader. Such a politics can win the respect of a majority of the country only if it breaks with Trump himself, and ignores the browbeating about the Court that the Vichy Republicans (like Hewitt) will offer until November 11th.

For evangelicals, the decision should be easy. Sadly, for many who are already supporting Trump, it is not. We have Bible verses clearly indicting Trump’s behavior, and in the strongest possible terms. I mean, look at the list from Proverbs about what the Lord hates: “haughty eyes, a lying tongue… a false witness that pours out lies…” Accepting Trump because he announces that we can be warm and filled completely divorces our political commitments from our interest in the Gospel. This is the time to recognize what you have wrought, and repent: The hour draws nigh, but it is not too late. Shamelessness is not courage. Defeating political correctness through wickedness is not a victory for the truth. The enemy of our enemy is not always our friend. If we feed the beast, he will someday grow strong enough to turn on us. And that day will come: Trump’s history of being blown by every wind and wave of sentiment virtually guarantees it.

For those evangelicals who are seized by despair at our political order and interested in burning it to the ground, consider instead voting for someone with the firmness of principles and character that will guarantee that when he arrives, he will not lose sight of his mission. C.S. Lewis once said he would rather play cards with an atheist who never cheated over a Christian who didn’t care. In the same way, disaffected evangelicals should prefer someone with a moral center over the hollow core of a B-grade celebrity. In other words, lend your support to Bernie Sanders: You’ll have as much of a chance of overturning our political order, having your interests represented, and passing pro-life policies as you will with Donald Trump. And he at least has the advantage of being a decent human being.

There is no world in which I would vote for Bernie Sanders. But I would consider it before I would ever consider voting for Donald Trump. And Republicans who expect us to fall in line come November should know that among evangelicals who have voted with them in the past, I am not alone.

 

Maximum Peach



Karma:
Posts: 9933
(9932 all sites)
Registered: 8/16/2005
Status: Offline

  posted on 3/1/2016 at 05:44 PM
trump is going to turn the republican party against itself, and implode it. its going to be fun to watch.
 

Peach Extraordinaire



Karma:
Posts: 4924
(4919 all sites)
Registered: 12/27/2003
Status: Offline

  posted on 3/1/2016 at 07:45 PM
Billy, I was high when I wrote that so let me clarify. I want Bernie to win it all - he represents what I stand for. I hope he gets the nod but I see Hillary getting it. I will certainly vote for Hillary if Trump is the nom, but if it comes to Rubio and Hillary, I'd have to go with Rubio, as of now. Depends on the future debates I guess. I need to see Hillary get much more passionate.
 

Ultimate Peach



Karma:
Posts: 3090
(3089 all sites)
Registered: 10/5/2005
Status: Offline

  posted on 3/1/2016 at 09:23 PM
Bernie socialist label has killed his chances in the south

 

____________________

 

Ultimate Peach



Karma:
Posts: 3947
(3953 all sites)
Registered: 10/5/2004
Status: Offline

  posted on 3/1/2016 at 09:58 PM
As we speak, watching Trump give his winner's speech with his lacky, the esteemed Governor of NJ standing behind him on the podium. Just a few weeks ago Christie (bully #1) was trash talking Trump (bully #2). Now Governor "time for some traffic" is carrying the water for Trump.

VP offer down the road for CC? Just what we need - a tag team of those two.

Trump just reinforced that Mexico will pay for the wall. Yep...bound to happen.

 

True Peach



Karma:
Posts: 12503
(12493 all sites)
Registered: 4/4/2003
Status: Offline

  posted on 3/2/2016 at 10:00 AM

 

____________________
I pledge and support the elimination of the derogatory use of the r-word from everyday speech and promote the acceptance and inclusion of people with intellectual disabilities. http://www.r-word.org/

 

Maximum Peach



Karma:
Posts: 8643
(8641 all sites)
Registered: 12/14/2004
Status: Offline

  posted on 3/2/2016 at 10:34 AM
http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/benghazi-heroes-support-trump/

 

____________________
You want to talk to me
Go ahead and talk
Whatever you got to say to me
Won't come as any shock

 

Maximum Peach



Karma:
Posts: 8270
(8270 all sites)
Registered: 6/9/2002
Status: Offline

  posted on 3/2/2016 at 11:05 AM
quote:
Billy, I was high...


Is what all of America will say one week into a Trump Presidency.

 

____________________
Capitalism will always survive, because socialism will be there to save it.

Ralph Nader's Father


 

Maximum Peach



Karma:
Posts: 9491
(9516 all sites)
Registered: 4/27/2003
Status: Offline

  posted on 3/2/2016 at 11:34 AM
Really enjoyed Super Tuesday last night. This is a really fun election! We had a contest of picking 1st-3rd for the Republicans and 1-2 for Dems in every state with a correct 1st pick = 3 pts, 2nd = 2 pts, 3rd = 1 and for any combination of the right names 1-3 you got an extra 1 pt. I came in first with 115 pts over my wife who had 90 something and my stepson was last with 80 pts. Now hopefully the delegates respect my victory at the convention

Doesn't anyone think that Trump's answer of "I don't know about David Duke" or "what groups, who are they", doesn't it seem like he was saying something like I am not aware of anything they have said about me or for my candidacy.

There are lots of things he could've or should've said to put some more distance between himself and Duke and groups like that, so in that respect he left himself open for criticism.

I've heard people say that he did what he did to not alienate any potential voters who share the view of a person like Duke or white supremecy group. That I find very very hard to believe. Right off the bat the guy thinks he is going to beat every candidate anyway and tells us all the time how big his leads are in the polls. I don't think he cared about trying to not offend that small part of who may be voting for him because really, when has he ever cared about offending people? Now all of a sudden he is tip toeing around to get those kind of people to vote for him? I don't buy it.

[Edited on 3/2/2016 by nebish]

 

Maximum Peach



Karma:
Posts: 9491
(9516 all sites)
Registered: 4/27/2003
Status: Offline

  posted on 3/2/2016 at 11:44 AM
quote:
http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/benghazi-heroes-support-trump/


quote:
"We get harassed by every single freaking government that we deal with," he said. "A lot of guys are fed up with it. And our government doesn’t do anything to back us up."


That bothered me. I am worried about the moral of our military.

I only have one friend who was deployed and did 2 tours in Iraq. My opinion is largely through what he tells me, but people he has stayed in touch with since being out of the Army feel the same way, they see the way our government has been handling military involvement in foreign conflicts as a big pile of **** (both Bush and Obama).

I found interviews with Tulsi Gabbard since leaving the DNC pretty informative on her views of how the government should or shouldn't use our military. It reaches a breaking point at some level, which we've already gone past probably.

 

Universal Peach



Karma:
Posts: 6189
(6198 all sites)
Registered: 6/1/2009
Status: Offline

  posted on 3/2/2016 at 12:09 PM
Bernie Sanders is done:

Hillary Clinton – 1034
Bernie Sanders – 408
Martin O'Malley – 0

2383 needed to win nomination • 4765 available



 

Maximum Peach



Karma:
Posts: 8270
(8270 all sites)
Registered: 6/9/2002
Status: Offline

  posted on 3/2/2016 at 12:41 PM
quote:
I only have one friend who was deployed and did 2 tours in Iraq. My opinion is largely through what he tells me, but people he has stayed in touch with since being out of the Army feel the same way, they see the way our government has been handling military involvement in foreign conflicts as a big pile of **** (both Bush and Obama).


My neighbor is a high ranking Commander in the Air Force. He is of the opinion that we need a Commander in Chief who will define our end game in Afghanistan. You can't win a war if you don't know what you are fighting for.

 

____________________
Capitalism will always survive, because socialism will be there to save it.

Ralph Nader's Father


 

Universal Peach



Karma:
Posts: 6189
(6198 all sites)
Registered: 6/1/2009
Status: Offline

  posted on 3/2/2016 at 01:33 PM
quote:
quote:
I only have one friend who was deployed and did 2 tours in Iraq. My opinion is largely through what he tells me, but people he has stayed in touch with since being out of the Army feel the same way, they see the way our government has been handling military involvement in foreign conflicts as a big pile of **** (both Bush and Obama).


My neighbor is a high ranking Commander in the Air Force. He is of the opinion that we need a Commander in Chief who will define our end game in Afghanistan. You can't win a war if you don't know what you are fighting for.

________________________________________________________________________

Tell your neighbor to tell his commander in chief.

 

True Peach



Karma:
Posts: 12503
(12493 all sites)
Registered: 4/4/2003
Status: Offline

  posted on 3/2/2016 at 02:46 PM

 

____________________
I pledge and support the elimination of the derogatory use of the r-word from everyday speech and promote the acceptance and inclusion of people with intellectual disabilities. http://www.r-word.org/

 

Peach Master



Karma:
Posts: 619
(630 all sites)
Registered: 1/3/2010
Status: Offline

  posted on 3/2/2016 at 04:29 PM
" I know nothing"...
As far as Tulsi goes, who could play second fiddle to Wasserman-Schultz ? good god

 

Universal Peach



Karma:
Posts: 6189
(6198 all sites)
Registered: 6/1/2009
Status: Offline

  posted on 3/2/2016 at 04:33 PM
quote:
" I know nothing"...
As far as Tulsi goes, who could play second fiddle to Wasserman-Schultz ? good god

__________________________________________________________________________

Gloria Steinem or Whoopi Goldberg

 

True Peach



Karma:
Posts: 12503
(12493 all sites)
Registered: 4/4/2003
Status: Offline

  posted on 3/2/2016 at 08:21 PM
Ha ha ha!!

“Searches for ‘how can I move to Canada’ on Google have spiked +350% in the past hours #SuperTuesday,” tweeted Google’s search engine data editor Simon Rogers.

http://www.wcsh6.com/news/google-searches-for-move-to-canada-spike-on-super -tuesday/64536954

 

____________________
I pledge and support the elimination of the derogatory use of the r-word from everyday speech and promote the acceptance and inclusion of people with intellectual disabilities. http://www.r-word.org/

 

Universal Peach



Karma:
Posts: 6189
(6198 all sites)
Registered: 6/1/2009
Status: Offline

  posted on 3/3/2016 at 01:25 PM
quote:
Ha ha ha!!

“Searches for ‘how can I move to Canada’ on Google have spiked +350% in the past hours #SuperTuesday,” tweeted Google’s search engine data editor Simon Rogers.

http://www.wcsh6.com/news/google-searches-for-move-to-canada-spike-on-super -tuesday/64536954

__________________________________________________________________________

Every presidential election cycle the Hollywood and far-left political mouthpieces say the same crap.
None of them ever do.

This year Whoopi Goldberg leads the list of liberals claiming they will "leave the country if so and so gets elected."



 

True Peach



Karma:
Posts: 12503
(12493 all sites)
Registered: 4/4/2003
Status: Offline

  posted on 3/3/2016 at 01:26 PM
I've never seen either party trying to hard to torpedo their POTUS frontrunner, especially this far into primary season, like the GOP is trying to do to Trump. Will be very interesting to see if they all flip as throroughly and completely as Chris Christie has if Trump does secure the nomination...


Mitt Romney thoroughly blasts Donald Trump as ‘phony,’ ‘fraud’
“He’s playing the American public for suckers,” Romney said.

Mitt Romney delivered the most comprehensive denunciation of Donald Trump to date on Thursday, thoroughly rejecting the billionaire’s temperament, his proposed policies, and his ability to tell the truth.

“Donald Trump is a phony, a fraud,” Romney said at the University of Utah. “His promises are as worthless as a degree from Trump University. He’s playing the American public for suckers: He gets a free ride to the White House and all we get is a lousy hat.”

Coming from the former Republican nominee, Thursday’s speech marked the most notable anti-Trump statements from any GOP leader not running for president.

Romney warned that Trump’s plan would send the economy into a prolonged recession, raise the deficit and debt, and start a trade war that would hurt consumers. He said Trump was “very very not smart” on foreign policy and doubted his claims of business success.

“But wait, you say, wait wait wait, isn’t he a huge business success? Doesn’t he know what he’s talking about? No he isn’t. And no he doesn’t,” Romney said. “A business genius he is not.”

He detailed a series of failed companies started and shuttered by the billionaire, including Trump Airlines, Trump University, Trump Magazine, Trump Vodka, Trump Steaks, and Trump Mortgage.

In addition, he contrasted Trump’s temperament with America’s history of “men of character.”

“Dishonesty is Trump’s hallmark,” Romney said, noting his widely discredited claim that he had seen thousands of Muslims celebrating on 9/11. “His is not the temperament of a stable, thoughtful leader. His imagination must not be married to real power.”

Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, has become more vocal in his criticisms of Trump in recent weeks. He has accused Trump of hiding a “bombshell” in his tax returns and rejected his “disgusting” response to receiving a former Ku Klux Klan leader’s support. He repeated those criticisms in his remarks Thursday.

Despite his forceful anti-Trump rhetoric, Romney declined to endorse another candidate. He said he would vote for the contender in each state who would best keep Trump from acquiring enough delegates to secure the nomination.

Romney’s speech included a wide vocabulary, using words like “improvident,” “bombast,” and “enmity.” The word choice was a marked contrast from Trump’s emphasis on simple, easy-to-understand language.

Finally, Romney challenged listeners to follow how Trump responds to Romney’s criticisms.

“Will he talk about our policy differences or will he attack me with every imaginable low road insult?” he asked.

Earlier on Thursday, Trump laid into Romney—“who doesn’t know how to win”—in a series of tweets and by calling into morning news programs.

http://www.boston.com/news/politics/2016/03/03/mitt-romney-set-put-trump-bl ast-phony-fraud/35jZ1wFH2l5xVeHoXRpFmJ/story.html

[Edited on 3/3/2016 by gondicar]

 

____________________
I pledge and support the elimination of the derogatory use of the r-word from everyday speech and promote the acceptance and inclusion of people with intellectual disabilities. http://www.r-word.org/

 

Maximum Peach



Karma:
Posts: 8270
(8270 all sites)
Registered: 6/9/2002
Status: Offline

  posted on 3/3/2016 at 01:56 PM
Why did Christie flip so thoroughly and so quickly? Speculation abound...



 

____________________
Capitalism will always survive, because socialism will be there to save it.

Ralph Nader's Father


 

True Peach



Karma:
Posts: 12503
(12493 all sites)
Registered: 4/4/2003
Status: Offline

  posted on 3/3/2016 at 04:10 PM
10 colorful Donald Trump insults from Mitt Romney's speech...


On Trump's business record:

"But you say, 'Wait wait wait,' isn't he a huge business success? Doesn't he know what he's talking about? No he isn't. And know he doesn't. His bankruptcies have crushed small businesses and the men and women who worked for them. He inherited his business, he didn't create it. And what ever happened to Trump Airlines? How about Trump University? And then there's Trump Magazine and Trump Vodka and Trump Steaks and Trump Mortgage. A business genius he is not."


On Trump's foreign policy credentials:

"Donald Trump tells us that he is very, very smart. I'm afraid that when it comes to foreign policy he is very, very not smart."


On whether Trump has the temperament of a president:

"This is an individual who mocked a disabled reporter, who attributed a reporter's questions to her menstrual cycle, who mocked a brilliant rival who happened to be a woman due to her appearance, who bragged about his marital affairs, and who laces his public speeches with vulgarity."


On how Trump recalls spending the Vietnam War years:

"There is dark irony in his boasts of his sexual exploits during the Vietnam War while at the same time John McCain, whom he has mocked, was imprisoned and tortured."


On Trump's "hallmark" quality:

"Dishonesty is Trump's hallmark: He claimed that he had spoken clearly and boldly against going into Iraq. Wrong. He spoke in favor of invading Iraq. He said he saw thousands of Muslims in New Jersey celebrating 9/11. Wrong. He saw no such thing. He imagined it. He's not of the temperament of the kind of stable, thoughtful person we need as leader. His imagination must not be married to real power."


On his very specific plan to defeat Trump in the primary:

"Given the current delegate selection process, that means that I'd vote for Marco Rubio in Florida, for John Kasich in Ohio, and for Ted Cruz or whichever one of the other two contenders has the best chance of beating Mr. Trump in a given state."


On Trump's less appealing "personal qualities":

"Think of Donald Trump's personal qualities, the bullying, the greed, the showing off, the misogyny, the absurd third grade theatrics. We have long referred to him as 'The Donald.' He is the only person in the entire country to whom we have added an article before his name. And it wasn't because he had attributes we admired."


On what Romney thinks is the most ridiculous idea of the campaign season so far:

"What he said on '60 Minutes' about Syria and ISIS has to go down as the most ridiculous and dangerous idea of the campaign season: Let ISIS take out Assad, he said, and then we can pick up the remnants. Think about that: Let the most dangerous terror organization the world has ever known take over a country? This is recklessness in the extreme."


On what would happen if Trump released his tax returns and a tape of his off-the-record conversation with The New York Times:

"I predict that there are more bombshells in his tax returns. I predict that he doesn't give much if anything to the disabled and to our veterans. I predict that he told The New York Times that his immigration talk is just that: talk. ... If I'm right (that he won't release either), you will have all the proof you need to know that Donald Trump is, indeed, a phony."


On the value of a diploma from Trump University:

"Here's what I know. Donald Trump is a phony, a fraud. His promises are as worthless as a degree from Trump University. He's playing the members of the American public for suckers: He gets a free ride to the White House and all we get is a lousy hat."


http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/03/politics/mitt-romney-donald-trump-harsh-quote s

[Edited on 3/3/2016 by gondicar]

 

____________________
I pledge and support the elimination of the derogatory use of the r-word from everyday speech and promote the acceptance and inclusion of people with intellectual disabilities. http://www.r-word.org/

 

True Peach



Karma:
Posts: 12503
(12493 all sites)
Registered: 4/4/2003
Status: Offline

  posted on 3/3/2016 at 04:29 PM

 

____________________
I pledge and support the elimination of the derogatory use of the r-word from everyday speech and promote the acceptance and inclusion of people with intellectual disabilities. http://www.r-word.org/

 

True Peach



Karma:
Posts: 12503
(12493 all sites)
Registered: 4/4/2003
Status: Offline

  posted on 3/3/2016 at 04:31 PM
Donald J. Trump on Mitt Romney's candidacy: "He was begging for my endorsement. I could have said 'Mitt, drop to your knees,' he would have dropped to his knees."



http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/03/politics/donald-trump-mitt-romney-would-have- dropped-to-his-knees-for-my-endorsement/index.html

 

____________________
I pledge and support the elimination of the derogatory use of the r-word from everyday speech and promote the acceptance and inclusion of people with intellectual disabilities. http://www.r-word.org/

 
<<  1    2    3    4    5    6    7  >>  


Powered by XForum 1.81.1 by Trollix Software

Privacy | Terms of Service | Report Infringement | Personal Data Management | Contact Us
The ALLMAN BROTHERS BAND name, The ALLMAN BROTHERS name, likenesses, logos, mushroom design and peach truck are all registered trademarks of THE ABB MERCHANDISING CO., INC. whose rights are specifically reserved. Any artwork, visual, or audio representations used on this web site CONTAINING ANY REGISTERED TRADEMARKS are under license from The ABB MERCHANDISING CO., INC. A REVOCABLE, GRATIS LICENSE IS GRANTED TO ALL REGISTERED PEACH CORP MEMBERS FOR The DOWNLOADING OF ONE COPY FOR PERSONAL USE ONLY. ANY DISTRIBUTION OR REPRODUCTION OF THE TRADEMARKS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE PROHIBITED AND ARE SPECIFICALLY RESERVED BY THE ABB MERCHANDISING CO.,INC.
site by Hittin' the Web Group with www.experiencewasabi3d.com