I am not familiar with this Congressional Representative but just wanted to give you the heads up that he will be leading others who feel the same way he does.
The Mueller investigation into the alleged Russian meddling into the 2016 election has produced no documents, no evidence and no witnesses. Nothing.
The memo proves that there are verified documents, extensive evidence and actual witnesses in the Clinton campaign, the DNC and the corrupt Obama DOJ and FBI collusion with the Russians to affect the outcome a Presidential election.
You must have read a different memo than the one I did, because the memo released today did not come close to proving any of that.
Don't know which one either of you read, but here is the memo:
http://dailycaller.com/2018/02/02/fisa-memo-released
You can read the text in the article, or download it as a pdf.
The Mueller investigation into the alleged Russian meddling into the 2016 election has produced no documents, no evidence and no witnesses. Nothing.
The memo proves that there are verified documents, extensive evidence and actual witnesses in the Clinton campaign, the DNC and the corrupt Obama DOJ and FBI collusion with the Russians to affect the outcome a Presidential election.
You must have read a different memo than the one I did, because the memo released today did not come close to proving any of that.
Don't know which one either of you read, but here is the memo:
http://dailycaller.com/2018/02/02/fisa-memo-releasedYou can read the text in the article, or download it as a pdf.
There is nothing at all in the document that points to the DNC, Obama, Clinton, the FBI or DOJ colluding with Russia. The memo also makes a very poor care for bias. It does, however, correctly point out that the FBI investigation started 3 months before the request for the warrant, so it was not the Steele dossier that started the investigation at all. Again, this is a big nothing burger put out as a desperate attempt to save the Trump presidency by smearing the FBI investigation. It is sad, pathetic, and unamerican.
The Mueller investigation into the alleged Russian meddling into the 2016 election has produced no documents, no evidence and no witnesses. Nothing.
The memo proves that there are verified documents, extensive evidence and actual witnesses in the Clinton campaign, the DNC and the corrupt Obama DOJ and FBI collusion with the Russians to affect the outcome a Presidential election.
Another scripted response from Bot Boy from Bulgaria.....Surely whoever posts this dribble could be a bit more original?
The Mueller investigation into the alleged Russian meddling into the 2016 election has produced no documents, no evidence and no witnesses. Nothing.
The memo proves that there are verified documents, extensive evidence and actual witnesses in the Clinton campaign, the DNC and the corrupt Obama DOJ and FBI collusion with the Russians to affect the outcome a Presidential election.
You must have read a different memo than the one I did, because the memo released today did not come close to proving any of that.
Don't know which one either of you read, but here is the memo:
http://dailycaller.com/2018/02/02/fisa-memo-releasedYou can read the text in the article, or download it as a pdf.
There is nothing at all in the document that points to the DNC, Obama, Clinton, the FBI or DOJ colluding with Russia. The memo also makes a very poor care for bias. It does, however, correctly point out that the FBI investigation started 3 months before the request for the warrant, so it was not the Steele dossier that started the investigation at all. Again, this is a big nothing burger put out as a desperate attempt to save the Trump presidency by smearing the FBI investigation. It is sad, pathetic, and unamerican.
Steele was a British intelligence source, he was paid $160,000 by the Clinton foundation, and the information he provided [which was supposedly NOT verified by the FBI] was the BASIS for the THREE warrants issued to spy on Trump, a US citizen, a presidential candidate, and Yes they wiretapped Trump tower and later lied about doing that.
The Russian investigation only became entangled in this because the Democrats said that the Russians were interfering in the election. Did Trump have business dealings with Russians? Yes his companies did, he has dealings with China also, nobody claimed China was influencing the election. The Democrats claimed that Russia was influencing the election - but they did not have proof of that.
The memo they did not want released showed their using our governmental agencies to spy and influence an election with UNVERIFIED evidence from a British intelligence source used to get warrants issued against Trump.
The Mueller investigation into the alleged Russian meddling into the 2016 election has produced no documents, no evidence and no witnesses. Nothing.
The memo proves that there are verified documents, extensive evidence and actual witnesses in the Clinton campaign, the DNC and the corrupt Obama DOJ and FBI collusion with the Russians to affect the outcome a Presidential election.
You must have read a different memo than the one I did, because the memo released today did not come close to proving any of that.
Don't know which one either of you read, but here is the memo:
http://dailycaller.com/2018/02/02/fisa-memo-releasedYou can read the text in the article, or download it as a pdf.
There is nothing at all in the document that points to the DNC, Obama, Clinton, the FBI or DOJ colluding with Russia. The memo also makes a very poor care for bias. It does, however, correctly point out that the FBI investigation started 3 months before the request for the warrant, so it was not the Steele dossier that started the investigation at all. Again, this is a big nothing burger put out as a desperate attempt to save the Trump presidency by smearing the FBI investigation. It is sad, pathetic, and unamerican.
Steele was a British intelligence source, he was paid $160,000 by the Clinton foundation, and the information he provided [which was supposedly NOT verified by the FBI] was the BASIS for the THREE warrants issued to spy on Trump, a US citizen, a presidential candidate, and Yes they wiretapped Trump tower and later lied about doing that.
The Russian investigation only became entangled in this because the Democrats said that the Russians were interfering in the election. Did Trump have business dealings with Russians? Yes his companies did, he has dealings with China also, nobody claimed China was influencing the election. The Democrats claimed that Russia was influencing the election - but they did not have proof of that.
The memo they did not want released showed their using our governmental agencies to spy and influence an election with UNVERIFIED evidence from a British intelligence source used to get warrants issued against Trump.
90% of this is completely wrong, starting from the first sentence. This is the first time I've actually seen someone claim the Clinton Foundation paid for the Steele dossier. Did you mean to say Clinton Campaign, because if there was evidence the Clinton Foundation paid for it then for the first time there would be an actual case to lock her up. I'm seriously doubting the charity paid for it.
Bot Boy from Bulgaria
hahahaHAHa good one
The Mueller investigation into the alleged Russian meddling into the 2016 election has produced no documents, no evidence and no witnesses. Nothing.
The memo proves that there are verified documents, extensive evidence and actual witnesses in the Clinton campaign, the DNC and the corrupt Obama DOJ and FBI collusion with the Russians to affect the outcome a Presidential election.
You must have read a different memo than the one I did, because the memo released today did not come close to proving any of that.
Don't know which one either of you read, but here is the memo:
http://dailycaller.com/2018/02/02/fisa-memo-releasedYou can read the text in the article, or download it as a pdf.
There is nothing at all in the document that points to the DNC, Obama, Clinton, the FBI or DOJ colluding with Russia. The memo also makes a very poor care for bias. It does, however, correctly point out that the FBI investigation started 3 months before the request for the warrant, so it was not the Steele dossier that started the investigation at all. Again, this is a big nothing burger put out as a desperate attempt to save the Trump presidency by smearing the FBI investigation. It is sad, pathetic, and unamerican.
Steele was a British intelligence source, he was paid $160,000 by the Clinton foundation, and the information he provided [which was supposedly NOT verified by the FBI] was the BASIS for the THREE warrants issued to spy on Trump, a US citizen, a presidential candidate, and Yes they wiretapped Trump tower and later lied about doing that.
The Russian investigation only became entangled in this because the Democrats said that the Russians were interfering in the election. Did Trump have business dealings with Russians? Yes his companies did, he has dealings with China also, nobody claimed China was influencing the election. The Democrats claimed that Russia was influencing the election - but they did not have proof of that.
The memo they did not want released showed their using our governmental agencies to spy and influence an election with UNVERIFIED evidence from a British intelligence source used to get warrants issued against Trump.
90% of this is completely wrong, starting from the first sentence. This is the first time I've actually seen someone claim the Clinton Foundation paid for the Steele dossier. Did you mean to say Clinton Campaign, because if there was evidence the Clinton Foundation paid for it then for the first time there would be an actual case to lock her up. I'm seriously doubting the charity paid for it.
They say that the man was paid from the foundation, they do not specify it was for payment of the dossier but people seem to believe that is what it was for. Others think it is a coincidence.
The Mueller investigation into the alleged Russian meddling into the 2016 election has produced no documents, no evidence and no witnesses. Nothing.
The memo proves that there are verified documents, extensive evidence and actual witnesses in the Clinton campaign, the DNC and the corrupt Obama DOJ and FBI collusion with the Russians to affect the outcome a Presidential election.
You must have read a different memo than the one I did, because the memo released today did not come close to proving any of that.
Don't know which one either of you read, but here is the memo:
http://dailycaller.com/2018/02/02/fisa-memo-releasedYou can read the text in the article, or download it as a pdf.
There is nothing at all in the document that points to the DNC, Obama, Clinton, the FBI or DOJ colluding with Russia. The memo also makes a very poor care for bias. It does, however, correctly point out that the FBI investigation started 3 months before the request for the warrant, so it was not the Steele dossier that started the investigation at all. Again, this is a big nothing burger put out as a desperate attempt to save the Trump presidency by smearing the FBI investigation. It is sad, pathetic, and unamerican.
Steele was a British intelligence source, he was paid $160,000 by the Clinton foundation, and the information he provided [which was supposedly NOT verified by the FBI] was the BASIS for the THREE warrants issued to spy on Trump, a US citizen, a presidential candidate, and Yes they wiretapped Trump tower and later lied about doing that.
The Russian investigation only became entangled in this because the Democrats said that the Russians were interfering in the election. Did Trump have business dealings with Russians? Yes his companies did, he has dealings with China also, nobody claimed China was influencing the election. The Democrats claimed that Russia was influencing the election - but they did not have proof of that.
The memo they did not want released showed their using our governmental agencies to spy and influence an election with UNVERIFIED evidence from a British intelligence source used to get warrants issued against Trump.
90% of this is completely wrong, starting from the first sentence. This is the first time I've actually seen someone claim the Clinton Foundation paid for the Steele dossier. Did you mean to say Clinton Campaign, because if there was evidence the Clinton Foundation paid for it then for the first time there would be an actual case to lock her up. I'm seriously doubting the charity paid for it.
They say that the man was paid from the foundation, they do not specify it was for payment of the dossier but people seem to believe that is what it was for. Others think it is a coincidence.
Who is "they"? A link would be nice. Nobody has accused the Clinton Foundation with paying Fusion GPS.
2-7-18 Hannity
From what I hear I am happy to say I have never seen or heard Hannity. I don't pay attention to liberal talking heads either. Makes for a much more relaxed existence.
The left-over Obama corrupt FBI trash are fleeing their FBI jobs fast.
The DOJ’s Inspector General’s report will probably be released next month.
