But I'm not one of the naysayers. Gridlock doesn't bother me.
And yes, the system IS designed for gridlock.
So you won't complain when Obama uses the veto or Congress uses the filibuster. Got it. We'll see how long that lasts. 😛
Why?
Why on elections day was the majority, and therefore control of, The Senate take away from the democrats and givren to The Republicans?
Why were even more democrats kicked out of The House and their seats given to The Republicans?
Why were the Governorships of so many blues states taken away from democrats and given to The Republicans?
Why are both houses of Congress now controlled by The Republicans, 30 of the state Governors and the majority of state Legislatures Republican?
Why?
But I'm not one of the naysayers. Gridlock doesn't bother me.
And yes, the system IS designed for gridlock.
So you won't complain when Obama uses the veto or Congress uses the filibuster. Got it. We'll see how long that lasts. 😛
Are you kidding? I don't think you're considering the type of stuff he'd be vetoing. Let him go ahead and veto something like Tax Reform or anything else the American people support. He's liable to blow the next election, too. The guy is toxic.
But I'm not one of the naysayers. Gridlock doesn't bother me.
And yes, the system IS designed for gridlock.
So you won't complain when Obama uses the veto or Congress uses the filibuster. Got it. We'll see how long that lasts. 😛
Are you kidding? I don't think you're considering the type of stuff he'd be vetoing. Let him go ahead and veto something like Tax Reform or anything else the American people support. He's liable to blow the next election, too. The guy is toxic.
So gridlock is NOT ok if it is lead by the Democrats. You are talking out of bpyh sides of your mouth again.
But we all knew that.
But I'm not one of the naysayers. Gridlock doesn't bother me.
And yes, the system IS designed for gridlock.
So you won't complain when Obama uses the veto or Congress uses the filibuster. Got it. We'll see how long that lasts. 😛
Are you kidding? I don't think you're considering the type of stuff he'd be vetoing. Let him go ahead and veto something like Tax Reform or anything else the American people support. He's liable to blow the next election, too. The guy is toxic.
So gridlock is NOT ok if it is lead by the Democrats. You are talking out of bpyh sides of your mouth again.
But we all knew that.
You got it totally backwards. Not only is it OK, it's encouraged!
But I'm not one of the naysayers. Gridlock doesn't bother me.
And yes, the system IS designed for gridlock.
So you won't complain when Obama uses the veto or Congress uses the filibuster. Got it. We'll see how long that lasts. 😛
Are you kidding? I don't think you're considering the type of stuff he'd be vetoing. Let him go ahead and veto something like Tax Reform or anything else the American people support. He's liable to blow the next election, too. The guy is toxic.
So gridlock is NOT ok if it is lead by the Democrats. You are talking out of bpyh sides of your mouth again.
But we all knew that.
You got it totally backwards. Not only is it OK, it's encouraged!
Then Obama should veto everything the Republicans propose. Gridlock is good. Got it. And you won't complain because it is what should be done. OK.
But I'm not one of the naysayers. Gridlock doesn't bother me.
And yes, the system IS designed for gridlock.
So you won't complain when Obama uses the veto or Congress uses the filibuster. Got it. We'll see how long that lasts. 😛
Are you kidding? I don't think you're considering the type of stuff he'd be vetoing. Let him go ahead and veto something like Tax Reform or anything else the American people support. He's liable to blow the next election, too. The guy is toxic.
So gridlock is NOT ok if it is lead by the Democrats. You are talking out of bpyh sides of your mouth again.
But we all knew that.
You got it totally backwards. Not only is it OK, it's encouraged!
Then Obama should veto everything the Republicans propose. Gridlock is good. Got it. And you won't complain because it is what should be done. OK.
I hope he vetoes bill after bill after bill. The more popular the proposal the better!
Maybe the real question here is whether the "obstruction" whiners start complaining. Now that would be interesting.
[Edited on 11/7/2014 by alloak41]
But I'm not one of the naysayers. Gridlock doesn't bother me.
And yes, the system IS designed for gridlock.
So you won't complain when Obama uses the veto or Congress uses the filibuster. Got it. We'll see how long that lasts. 😛
Are you kidding? I don't think you're considering the type of stuff he'd be vetoing. Let him go ahead and veto something like Tax Reform or anything else the American people support. He's liable to blow the next election, too. The guy is toxic.
So gridlock is NOT ok if it is lead by the Democrats. You are talking out of bpyh sides of your mouth again.
But we all knew that.
You got it totally backwards. Not only is it OK, it's encouraged!
Then Obama should veto everything the Republicans propose. Gridlock is good. Got it. And you won't complain because it is what should be done. OK.
I hope he vetoes bill after bill after bill. The more popular proposal the better.
Maybe the real question here is whether the "obstruction" whiners start complaining. Now that would be interesting.
[Edited on 11/7/2014 by alloak41]
I know that you will be defending Obama because you agree with him on vetoing everything. 😛
