Obama criticizes Americans for standing strong against terrorism.
Putin: 'To Forgive The Terrorists Is Up To God, But To Send Them To Him Is Up To Me'
It is a sad day when the Russian President shows strong leadership while the American President shows none.
Commie! Pinko! Traitor!!!
Obama criticizes Americans for standing strong against terrorism.
Putin: 'To Forgive The Terrorists Is Up To God, But To Send Them To Him Is Up To Me'
It is a sad day when the Russian President shows strong leadership while the American President shows none.
Someone like you endlessly repeating this doesn't make it true.......
Americans have bombed ISIS over 6000 times
Co-op countries have another 1500
France twice
Russia just started...
US killed Jihadi John plus a key leader in Libya just last week - but believe your right wing emails instead....
When asked directly, Obama’s Sec. of Defense would not answer if he thought it was safe to let the un-vetted refugees into The U.S.
I have not heard anyone come out in favor of letting un-vetted refugees into the U.S. Please provide a reference to anyone who has taken that position.
Easy.
Obama's speeches from The G-20 and Manila.
A handful of weak Obama a$$ kissing Democrats
The posts here from the liberals.
The left-wing media people who blindly support Obama's reckless program.Essentially a small group of un-American pussies whose politics far outweigh national security.
I was really asking for a link to a direct quote from someone in authority. I guess you don't have it.
_______________________________________________________________________
Those in authority have been quoted widely and the videos of those statements are everywhere.
Do you not read?
I'll take that as an admission that you cannot provide a solid reference. Thanks. Goodbye.
___________________________________________________________________
I'll take that as you have joined the liberals low-info voter club.
Learn to research actual data. If you need help, ask a teenager.
I'll take that as you have joined the liberals low-info voter club.
Learn to research actual data. If you need help, ask a teenager.
Commie! Pinko! Traitor!!!
When asked directly, Obama’s Sec. of Defense would not answer if he thought it was safe to let the un-vetted refugees into The U.S.
I have not heard anyone come out in favor of letting un-vetted refugees into the U.S. Please provide a reference to anyone who has taken that position.
Easy.
Obama's speeches from The G-20 and Manila.
A handful of weak Obama a$$ kissing Democrats
The posts here from the liberals.
The left-wing media people who blindly support Obama's reckless program.Essentially a small group of un-American pussies whose politics far outweigh national security.
I was really asking for a link to a direct quote from someone in authority. I guess you don't have it.
_______________________________________________________________________
Those in authority have been quoted widely and the videos of those statements are everywhere.
Do you not read?
I'll take that as an admission that you cannot provide a solid reference. Thanks. Goodbye.
___________________________________________________________________
I'll take that as you have joined the liberals low-info voter club.
Learn to research actual data. If you need help, ask a teenager.
I've looked and can't find a single video or media outlet quoting Obama, Democrats, or left-wing media people saying that is it safe to let the un-vetted refugees from Syria, or anyplace else for that matter, into the U.S. Haven't seen any posts here even remotely suggest that either. You need to put up or shut up, son.
[Edited on 11/18/2015 by gondicar]
When asked directly, Obama’s Sec. of Defense would not answer if he thought it was safe to let the un-vetted refugees into The U.S.
I have not heard anyone come out in favor of letting un-vetted refugees into the U.S. Please provide a reference to anyone who has taken that position.
Easy.
Obama's speeches from The G-20 and Manila.
A handful of weak Obama a$$ kissing Democrats
The posts here from the liberals.
The left-wing media people who blindly support Obama's reckless program.Essentially a small group of un-American pussies whose politics far outweigh national security.
I was really asking for a link to a direct quote from someone in authority. I guess you don't have it.
_______________________________________________________________________
Those in authority have been quoted widely and the videos of those statements are everywhere.
Do you not read?
I'll take that as an admission that you cannot provide a solid reference. Thanks. Goodbye.
___________________________________________________________________
I'll take that as you have joined the liberals low-info voter club.
Learn to research actual data. If you need help, ask a teenager.
I've looked and can't find a single video or media outlet quoting Obama, Democrats, or left-wing media people saying that is it safe to let the un-vetted refugees from Syria, or anyplace else for that matter, into the U.S. Haven't seen any posts here even remotely suggest that either. You need to put up or shut up, son.
________________________________________________________________________No son, you need to learn how to do basic research, a skill you have never some close to exhibiting.
When asked directly, Obama’s Sec. of Defense would not answer if he thought it was safe to let the un-vetted refugees into The U.S.
I have not heard anyone come out in favor of letting un-vetted refugees into the U.S. Please provide a reference to anyone who has taken that position.
Easy.
Obama's speeches from The G-20 and Manila.
A handful of weak Obama a$$ kissing Democrats
The posts here from the liberals.
The left-wing media people who blindly support Obama's reckless program.Essentially a small group of un-American pussies whose politics far outweigh national security.
I was really asking for a link to a direct quote from someone in authority. I guess you don't have it.
_______________________________________________________________________
Those in authority have been quoted widely and the videos of those statements are everywhere.
Do you not read?
I'll take that as an admission that you cannot provide a solid reference. Thanks. Goodbye.
___________________________________________________________________
I'll take that as you have joined the liberals low-info voter club.
Learn to research actual data. If you need help, ask a teenager.
I've looked and can't find a single video or media outlet quoting Obama, Democrats, or left-wing media people saying that is it safe to let the un-vetted refugees from Syria, or anyplace else for that matter, into the U.S. Haven't seen any posts here even remotely suggest that either. You need to put up or shut up, son.
________________________________________________________________________No son, you need to learn how to do basic research, a skill you have never some close to exhibiting.
So you were lying again. Got it.
Christians who want to close our borders and keep the Syrian refugees out are so right about this whole Syrian refugee thing - good thing Jesus, Mary and Joseph weren't middle eastern refugees..... oh, wait.
Jesus Mary and Joseph were not refugees. Where on earth do you get that from? This crap is constantly made up. They were on their way to Jerusalem to take part in a routine annual census and according to tradition there was no room at the local hotel so they spent the night in a manger. They had a home in the Galilee where they returned to immediately after taking part in the Jerusalem census.
The courts will decide; like the previous threat about Obama's last immigration policy defeat
I wonder what the courts would have decided about the Jewish refugees in 1938? Were any of those folks people you know emr?
Was there a danger that hiding among Holacaust refugees were members of a deadly religious death cult that has promised to reek havoc among the Western world?
PART 2
And I just don't trust the administration. I personally have witnessed thousands of illegals receiving health insurance despite the governments assurance that this will never happen. Their word on immigration issues mean nothing
You hit the nail on the head. The word of Obama means absolutely nothing, perhaps less than nothing. There is no reason on earth to believe that these groups of refugees will screen out any possible terrorists amongst them prior to gaining entrance to the United States. In any event the American public is strongly against this at this time but that has never stopped Obama before.
The courts will decide; like the previous threat about Obama's last immigration policy defeat
I wonder what the courts would have decided about the Jewish refugees in 1938? Were any of those folks people you know emr?
Was there a danger that hiding among Holacaust refugees were members of a deadly religious death cult that has promised to reek havoc among the Western world?
According to some people at the time, they were worse than that.
When acts or terrorism can be prevented every step must be taken.
Xenophobia is not the answer. I am reminded of Anne Frank. She was denied access to refugee resettlement in the US because of fear of her religion. Instead, she died at Bergen-Belsen concentration camp at the age of 15. Her diary has sold more than 75 million copies.
Also interesting how callously these governors and others are treating the US Constitution. I guess if it isn't the 2nd amendment then the Constitution isn't worth the parchment it is written on to them.
[Edited on 11/17/2015 by gondicar]
There is no compraison to the Holocaust. Those who are concenred about allowing tens of thousands of people from this region into the country at this time are not xenophobic, we do not think all Muslims are terrorists. We are rightly concerned that the bad will slip in and do us grqave harm. Creating Obama style straw horses to beat will not change the facts.
PART 2
And I just don't trust the administration. I personally have witnessed thousands of illegals receiving health insurance despite the governments assurance that this will never happen. Their word on immigration issues mean nothing
You hit the nail on the head. The word of Obama means absolutely nothing, perhaps less than nothing. There is no reason on earth to believe that these groups of refugees will screen out any possible terrorists amongst them prior to gaining entrance to the United States. In any event the American public is strongly against this at this time but that has never stopped Obama before.
Now you are the one making stuff up.
The majority of States are now refusing to allow Obama to dump Syrian refugees on them and endangering their citizens.
Scores of people in a position to know are publically stating that the Syrian refugees cannot be vetted.
Yesterday at his G-20 speech Obama was clearly irritated with the media’s repeated questions on this subject. The press kept asking because Obama kept not answering their questions directly. He looked and sounded like Hillary Clinton at Saturday night’s debate. Obama was hammered by the White House Press Corp. and annoyed with those who he used to count on to parrot his agenda. Obama’s embarrassing speech to the world yesterday didn’t make the front page of most American newspapers this morning.
Obama was impassioned about American taking in these refugees who are suffering from the war in their country. Where was Obama’s passion over the last few years while his lack of action and failed foreign policies caused the problem?
ISIS announced a long time ago that they are covertly inserting their fighters into the fleeing refugees.
Democrat Senator Dianne Feinstein was loudest of the Democrats yesterday on the need for Obama to clearly state a Syrian refugee relocation program before Congress and The American People. Sen. Feinstein is one of the few hawks in the Democratic Party but her words carry a lot of weight.
A Trojan horse is coming to American. The American People see it and want Obama to put their safety put first.
This is all nonsense and also cowardly. ISIS was created by George W and is an example of REPUBLICAN failed war policy. Every piece of evidence supports this.
It was the ISIS objective to make the rest of the world fear the refugees. They have succeeded.
The current Republican leadership has surrendered to ISIS. The governors who are almost all Republican have also surrendered to ISIS. They are all afraid! ISIS will be emboldened by this overt display of fear.
I won't even get into the argument of "who created ISIS" because its utterly irrelevant. Bush is not president now. Obama is. ISIS has thrived over the last seven years, is stron ger than ever and is now directly threatening the West. Obama has constantly downplayed the threat and we are not about to take his word now. ISIS couldn't care LESS whether we let in refugees or not. Their goal is to establish a world wide caliphate and ensure everyone follows their brand of Islam. Everything they do is intended to further that goal.
When acts or terrorism can be prevented every step must be taken.
Xenophobia is not the answer. I am reminded of Anne Frank. She was denied access to refugee resettlement in the US because of fear of her religion. Instead, she died at Bergen-Belsen concentration camp at the age of 15. Her diary has sold more than 75 million copies.
Also interesting how callously these governors and others are treating the US Constitution. I guess if it isn't the 2nd amendment then the Constitution isn't worth the parchment it is written on to them.
[Edited on 11/17/2015 by gondicar]
There is no compraison to the Holocaust. Those who are concenred about allowing tens of thousands of people from this region into the country at this time are not xenophobic, we do not think all Muslims are terrorists. We are rightly concerned that the bad will slip in and do us grqave harm. Creating Obama style straw horses to beat will not change the facts.
Given the stringency of the vetting process, which has been posted in this thread several times now, coming to the US as refugee especially from Syria is the least likely way for a terrorist to slip through. You and others are forgoing rational thought and giving in to fear and that is exactly what ISIS wants.
Here is what mulemans weak and xenophobic rants don't mention. Terrorists do not need to masquerade as refugees. The brothers who were responsible for the Marathon bombings were US citizens and legal residents of the US. The 9/11 airplane hijackers got into the country any way they wished and brought about the worst act of terror to date in the USA. Refugees are people who are FLEEING from that sort of thing in their own homeland and over 750,000 of them have come to the US since 9/11 and none have been arrested for anything terrorism related.
Ok. You see this is simply not correct. They were in the U.S. on a toruist visa and their father claimed political assylum from the Chechen conflict so they were indeed refugees. And a classic example of the danger of radicalized Islam wherever it is.
The majority of States are now refusing to allow Obama to dump Syrian refugees on them and endangering their citizens.
Scores of people in a position to know are publically stating that the Syrian refugees cannot be vetted.
Yesterday at his G-20 speech Obama was clearly irritated with the media’s repeated questions on this subject. The press kept asking because Obama kept not answering their questions directly. He looked and sounded like Hillary Clinton at Saturday night’s debate. Obama was hammered by the White House Press Corp. and annoyed with those who he used to count on to parrot his agenda. Obama’s embarrassing speech to the world yesterday didn’t make the front page of most American newspapers this morning.
Obama was impassioned about American taking in these refugees who are suffering from the war in their country. Where was Obama’s passion over the last few years while his lack of action and failed foreign policies caused the problem?
ISIS announced a long time ago that they are covertly inserting their fighters into the fleeing refugees.
Democrat Senator Dianne Feinstein was loudest of the Democrats yesterday on the need for Obama to clearly state a Syrian refugee relocation program before Congress and The American People. Sen. Feinstein is one of the few hawks in the Democratic Party but her words carry a lot of weight.
A Trojan horse is coming to American. The American People see it and want Obama to put their safety put first.
This is all nonsense and also cowardly. ISIS was created by George W and is an example of REPUBLICAN failed war policy. Every piece of evidence supports this.
It was the ISIS objective to make the rest of the world fear the refugees. They have succeeded.
The current Republican leadership has surrendered to ISIS. The governors who are almost all Republican have also surrendered to ISIS. They are all afraid! ISIS will be emboldened by this overt display of fear.
I won't even get into the argument of "who created ISIS" because its utterly irrelevant. Bush is not president now. Obama is. ISIS has thrived over the last seven years, is stron ger than ever and is now directly threatening the West. Obama has constantly downplayed the threat and we are not about to take his word now. ISIS couldn't care LESS whether we let in refugees or not. Their goal is to establish a world wide caliphate and ensure everyone follows their brand of Islam. Everything they do is intended to further that goal.
And the propaganda and fear mongering coming from the right is only helping them toward that goal.
Democrat Governors see the writing on the wall, joining effort lead by Republican Governors to block Syrian refugees. Heading the warning by Obama's CIA Director, Homeland Security Sec. and many other senior administration officials that have said these people cannot be vetted.
Now, 30 States are standing up to Obama's reckless policy to allow Syrian refugees freely into the U.S.
Yes. Young Saudis who want to come here should be placed under the CLOSEST scrutiny and continued surveillance but I doubt most on the left would find that acceptable.
Here is a chance to activate a brain long dormant due to right wing silliness. 15 of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudis and Saudis today continue to join ISiS. One would think that Saudis would be a much greater security threat than poor refugees. Why pick on Syrians who were victims of ISIS? Why not ban the Saudis? If one wants to be paranoid that is the much better choice.
This distraction is starting to look very much like the invasion of Iraq.
Here is what mulemans weak and xenophobic rants don't mention. Terrorists do not need to masquerade as refugees. The brothers who were responsible for the Marathon bombings were US citizens and legal residents of the US. The 9/11 airplane hijackers got into the country any way they wished and brought about the worst act of terror to date in the USA. Refugees are people who are FLEEING from that sort of thing in their own homeland and over 750,000 of them have come to the US since 9/11 and none have been arrested for anything terrorism related.
Ok. You see this is simply not correct. They were in the U.S. on a toruist visa and their father claimed political assylum from the Chechen conflict so they were indeed refugees. And a classic example of the danger of radicalized Islam wherever it is.
Except they were radicalized here, in the US.
The USA can provide significant support for the refugees without importing them to our country. We should not continue to admit large groups of immigrants whose beliefs are not compatible with our society and culture. Multiculturalism does NOT work and there is plenty of evidence throughout Europe. Many of those countries will lose their identities as their native populations get replaced by immigrants.
There are many peaceful Muslims, but they all subscribe to sharia law. Trust me when I tell you that you do not want to live under sharia law.
This is one of the most unAmerican posts I've read here. America is built on multiculturalism.
[Edited on 11/18/2015 by gondicar]
Um...no. AMerica is built on assimilating immigrants. Remember the term the great "melting pot". The term "multi-culturalism" is the precise opposite of that. It denies that there is an American culture that immigrants need to learn to be a part of. As it turns out most of the immigrants from the past who xenophobes claimed could not assimilate did with no problem. But that is not analogous to the problem with Islam today. Most of the Muslim immigrants to the U.S. have assimilated to this point (though not all) In Europe we see a serious serious problem with Muslim populations that have not assimilated.
America was not built by Islamic Extremist Terrorists.
Wouldn't Paul revere and his buddies be considered Terrorists back in the jour?
I don't think so but even if they were they were not Islamic Extremist terrorists were they? Do you think there is no distinction between the patriots and ISIS?
quote:
quote:ISIS must really enjoy Obama's speeches when he repeatedly states what he will not do.
Yes, maybe we should ask Jihadi John what he thinks of Obama's weakness..... oh, wait.....
________________________________________________________________________
Maybe we should ask the thousands of dead, killed by Islamic Extremist Terrorists what they think of the weak, cowardly American President.
Who got a bead and pulled the trigger on Bin Laden? Not George W and his hunting buddy.
You act like a two year old if you have nothing to add to the discussion go back to watching roller derby.
Obama got a bead and pulled the trigger? Funny I thought it was special forces. Amazing as the world erupts in flames due to Obama's spinelessness and ideological blindness his fans will stick to this one thing. The man pulled the trigger on Bin LAden. As if they hadn't been hunting him for ten years and as if any president wouldn't have done that. Barak Obama, takes credit for anything positive, rejects blame for anything negative.
When acts or terrorism can be prevented every step must be taken.
Xenophobia is not the answer. I am reminded of Anne Frank. She was denied access to refugee resettlement in the US because of fear of her religion. Instead, she died at Bergen-Belsen concentration camp at the age of 15. Her diary has sold more than 75 million copies.
Also interesting how callously these governors and others are treating the US Constitution. I guess if it isn't the 2nd amendment then the Constitution isn't worth the parchment it is written on to them.
[Edited on 11/17/2015 by gondicar]
There is no compraison to the Holocaust. Those who are concenred about allowing tens of thousands of people from this region into the country at this time are not xenophobic, we do not think all Muslims are terrorists. We are rightly concerned that the bad will slip in and do us grqave harm. Creating Obama style straw horses to beat will not change the facts.
Given the stringency of the vetting process, which has been posted in this thread several times now, coming to the US as refugee especially from Syria is the least likely way for a terrorist to slip through. You and others are forgoing rational thought and giving in to fear and that is exactly what ISIS wants.
I don't trust the government. They lie constantly about everything. ALso this is not what ISIS wants. ISIS wants us all to either die or become their style of Muslims. Also I don;t CARE what ISIS wants. Hitler wanted war in 1939. Should England and France have not gone to war be3cause its what Hitler wanted?
Yeah. Screw the refugees. What could go wrong?
Here is what mulemans weak and xenophobic rants don't mention. Terrorists do not need to masquerade as refugees. The brothers who were responsible for the Marathon bombings were US citizens and legal residents of the US. The 9/11 airplane hijackers got into the country any way they wished and brought about the worst act of terror to date in the USA. Refugees are people who are FLEEING from that sort of thing in their own homeland and over 750,000 of them have come to the US since 9/11 and none have been arrested for anything terrorism related.
Ok. You see this is simply not correct. They were in the U.S. on a toruist visa and their father claimed political assylum from the Chechen conflict so they were indeed refugees. And a classic example of the danger of radicalized Islam wherever it is.
Except they were radicalized here, in the US.
You make my point. There is a serious danger from radical Islam anywhere it is allowed to thrive in too large numbers. That includes Europe where it is soon going to spill over into open warfare, mark my words, and also here though the danger has been less so far as we have done a better job of assimilating our Muslim population.
The courts will decide; like the previous threat about Obama's last immigration policy defeat
I wonder what the courts would have decided about the Jewish refugees in 1938? Were any of those folks people you know emr?
Was there a danger that hiding among Holacaust refugees were members of a deadly religious death cult that has promised to reek havoc among the Western world?
According to some people at the time, they were worse than that.
Negative feelings were strong and biased; but to my knowledge no one feared that Tevye would blow up their neighborhood
Just like the gun control and gay marriage issue, I couldn't care any less what the Constituition or the Bible says when it comes to the Syrian refugee issue. We must only analyze present day conditions when making decisions, and in light of what's going on with ISIS, we should be adapting. Past refugee stories are irrelevant because they do not address the threat ISIS poses. Address the threat and then let's talk.
Whe I admit Obama's decision on this is wrong, it is beyond foolish to blame him for what has happened. Just as no other administration would've reacted differently to the FBI 9/11 memo warning, no other administration would be doing anything differently post Iraq, so save the "blame Obama" POV. It's weak. If you are going to unfairly rip him for every move, then be consistent and give him credit for doing more to fight ISIS than any other world leader.
Christians who want to close our borders and keep the Syrian refugees out are so right about this whole Syrian refugee thing - good thing Jesus, Mary and Joseph weren't middle eastern refugees..... oh, wait.
Jesus Mary and Joseph were not refugees. Where on earth do you get that from? This crap is constantly made up. They were on their way to Jerusalem to take part in a routine annual census and according to tradition there was no room at the local hotel so they spent the night in a manger. They had a home in the Galilee where they returned to immediately after taking part in the Jerusalem census.
I love a good fairy tale.
Thanks!
i said it once, i said it twice and now i will say it 3 times.
i have zero worry or fear that I or anyone i know, including those in the WP will be killed by terrorists. i have no worry the same will be killed in a movie theatre. i'm not worried about ebola. i'm not worried about lightning or a tornado. i'm not worried about a gang or driveby shooting.
i would be more worried about a car crash. i would be more worried about a heart attack. i would be more worried about cancer.
look if you want to be afraid that a rag tag group of zealots has a snowballs chance in hell of hurting you, enjoy yourself.
if you want to be afraid that Daesh has even a tiny chance of overthrowing western civilization, then you have little faith in our philosophy.
don't let the terrorists win, irrational fear doesn't show how strong we are.
i've listened to the pro gun people say over and over how protected they feel because they are armed and those who don't arm themselves are stupid.
well start acting like you are strong and unafraid.
alot of people will die in america in 2016, but it won't be from a handful of refugees. it will be from other americans.
When asked directly, Obama’s Sec. of Defense would not answer if he thought it was safe to let the un-vetted refugees into The U.S.
I have not heard anyone come out in favor of letting un-vetted refugees into the U.S. Please provide a reference to anyone who has taken that position.
Easy.
Obama's speeches from The G-20 and Manila.
A handful of weak Obama a$$ kissing Democrats
The posts here from the liberals.
The left-wing media people who blindly support Obama's reckless program.Essentially a small group of un-American pussies whose politics far outweigh national security.
I was really asking for a link to a direct quote from someone in authority. I guess you don't have it.
_______________________________________________________________________
Those in authority have been quoted widely and the videos of those statements are everywhere.
Do you not read?
I'll take that as an admission that you cannot provide a solid reference. Thanks. Goodbye.
___________________________________________________________________
I'll take that as you have joined the liberals low-info voter club.
Learn to research actual data. If you need help, ask a teenager.
I've looked and can't find a single video or media outlet quoting Obama, Democrats, or left-wing media people saying that is it safe to let the un-vetted refugees from Syria, or anyplace else for that matter, into the U.S. Haven't seen any posts here even remotely suggest that either. You need to put up or shut up, son.
________________________________________________________________________No son, you need to learn how to do basic research, a skill you have never some close to exhibiting.
So you were lying again. Got it.
_________________________________________________________________________
Then explain to us why a clear, bi-partisan majority of States are refusing to accept the un-vetted Syrian Refugees:
34 States: North Dakota Joins Majority Of Governors Refusing To Relocate Syrian Refugees, Cites Security Concerns
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2015/11/18/31-states-north-dakota-joins-majority-of-governors-refusing-to-relocate-syrian-refugees-cites-security-concerns-n2082522More than half the nation's governors say Syrian refugees not welcome
http://edition.cnn.com/2015/11/16/world/paris-attacks-syrian-refugees-backlash/index.htmlUS Intel Experts Warn Of ‘Gaping Holes’ In Refugee Vetting
http://www.infowars.com/us-intel-experts-warn-of-gaping-holes-in-refugee-vetting/What is the Syrian refugee vetting process?
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/what-is-the-syrian-refugee-vetting-process/More than half of U.S. governors reject Syrian refugees
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/what-is-the-syrian-refugee-vetting-process/The FBI admits it cannot vet the Syrian Refugees:
http://www.examiner.com/article/syrian-refugees-could-be-trojan-horse-for-jihadists-warns-donald-trumpFBI admits there's no way to screen all the Syrian refugees the Obama administration plans to accept into the US
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3283587/FBI-admits-s-no-way-screen-Syrian-refugees-Obama-administration-plans-accept-US.htmlBTW – you won’t find many of the reports of the senior Obama administration saying the Syrian refuges can’t be vetted and warning that allowing them to freely roam the U.S. in the mainstream biased media. Most of those outlets are suppressing any actual news that reflects badly on Obama.
They don’t report the CIA, FBI and National Security Directors Congressional Testimony warning of the inability to screen the Syrian refugees and the danger of allowing them in the U.S.
You can find it in the Congressional Record.
Again, why is a bi-partisan majority of States are refusing to accept the un-vetted Syrian Refugees?
