Which means absolutely nothing, but according to Muleman, TV ratings somehow translate to a measurement of an ideology's success. I just found it hilarious that he puts so much stock into cable ratings, just like my 6-year old nephew. Cute!
Ratings will not mean anything to him anymore
http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/tv/msnbc-beats-fox-news-cnn-ratings-time-article-1.3186796
Thats the problem with liberals. They tend to only habitat their respective bubbles.. What the outside world thinks (translation:ratings, legislation) means little to nothing.
Thats the problem with liberals. They tend to only habitat their respective bubbles.. What the outside world thinks (translation:ratings, legislation) means little to nothing.
Goob, it is your brother Mule who makes the big deal about ratings, not us.
Says the guy who supports building a border wall and travel bans, LOL. Goob, go back to the kids table.
Thats the problem with liberals. They tend to only habitat their respective bubbles.. What the outside world thinks (translation:ratings, legislation) means little to nothing.
Besides this website, how many liberals do you interact with, and do you have in person political discussions with them?
Given your hatred for them, I'd be quite surprised if you associate with such people.
Ratings will not mean anything to him anymore
http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/tv/msnbc-beats-fox-news-cnn-rating s-time-article-1.3186796
MSNBC is just really good at what they do. MSNBC is my go to source for TV news with an occasional gander at CNN or Fox.
Plus those so-called 'fox babes' don't have anything on Hallie Jackson, Katy Tur and Nicole Wallace...IMO 😉
Except for some often long-winded opening monologues, Maddow's show is excellent.
Nothing against Fox, I do check in with them and enjoy a couple of their shows and personalities. But if I had a Nielsen book in my house MSNBC would be getting checked alot.
