What we need is a leader! Someone who will do something!

Growth in several jihadi-related sectors such as Toyota trucks and orange jumpsuits fell sharply due to the unusually cold winter, an Obama spokesperson said.

"Unemployment for terrorists seeking jihad are at an all time low," analysts said.

Signs point to a much stronger caliphayte.

Growth in several jihadi-related sectors such as Toyota trucks and orange jumpsuits fell sharply due to the unusually cold winter, an Obama spokesperson said.

"Unemployment for terrorists seeking jihad are at an all time low," analysts said.

Signs point to a much stronger caliphayte.

Just think, if you used spell check, your posts would seem far more intelligent. No, maybe not.

So from the same Administration to which stories abound of doctored intelligence and military reports that "enhance" our accomplishments to feed the narrative, we're supposed to take this on face value?

I have little doubt that we're handling the bulk of the effort. I also have little doubt that a lot of these accomplishments may be dubious at best.

I can hear the howls now: "Obama hater", "anti-govt whack job", blah, blah....

Distrust of govt-provided info is a healthy thing

So from the same Administration to which stories abound of doctored intelligence and military reports that "enhance" our accomplishments to feed the narrative, we're supposed to take this on face value?

I have little doubt that we're handling the bulk of the effort. I also have little doubt that a lot of these accomplishments may be dubious at best.

I can hear the howls now: "Obama hater", "anti-govt whack job", blah, blah....

Distrust of govt-provided info is a healthy thing

_______________________________________________________________________

Agreed.

Defense Intelligence staff that produce that real terrorist data have been openly criticizing the Obama administration for changing their reports and misrepresenting the serious nature of the information.

There is Obama manipulated information and then the actual facts.

The left believe the former.

Not even the Department of Defense is free from source-bashing.

Unless, of course, there's a Republican in the Oval Office. Ever used a .gov link to support a point you've ever made, Rich? Yes, that's a rhetorical question.

I can hear the howls now: "Obama hater", "anti-govt whack job", blah, blah....

Well, you and your buddy here do hate Obama and you do hate the government. Whack job would be an unnecessary insult.

Obama administration busted for manipulating DIA Analyst's data on ISIS:

Inquiry Weighs Whether ISIS Analysis Was Distorted
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/26/world/middleeast/pentagon-investigates-allegations-of-skewed-intelligence-reports-on-isis.html?_r=3

Exclusive: 50 Spies Say ISIS Intelligence Was Cooked
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/09/09/exclusive-50-spies-say-isis-intelligence-was-cooked.html

CBS News affirmation of ISIS data manipulation included.

Dozens of intelligence analysts reportedly claim assessments of ISIS were altered
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/09/10/dozens-intelligence-analysts-reportedly-claim-reports-on-isis-were-altered.html

Is Someone Politicizing Intelligence on ISIS?
http://politicalviolenceataglance.org/2015/08/28/is-the-us-military-artificially-optimistic-about-the-war-against-isis/

[Edited on 11/20/2015 by Muleman1994]

Obama administration busted for manipulating DIA Analyst's data ion ISIS:

Inquiry Weighs Whether ISIS Analysis Was Distorted
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/26/world/middleeast/pentagon-investigates-allegations-of-skewed-intelligence-reports-on-isis.html?_r=3

Exclusive: 50 Spies Say ISIS Intelligence Was Cooked
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/09/09/exclusive-50-spies-say-isis-intelligence-was-cooked.html

CBS News affirmation of ISIS data manipulation included.

Dozens of intelligence analysts reportedly claim assessments of ISIS were altered
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/09/10/dozens-intelligence-analysts-reportedly-claim-reports-on-isis-were-altered.html

Is Someone Politicizing Intelligence on ISIS?
http://politicalviolenceataglance.org/2015/08/28/is-the-us-military-artificially-optimistic-about-the-war-against-isis/

The above details a problem within the military. I wonder how long they've been doing this and whether the Vietnam, Iraq and Afghan wars were investigated.

Not even the Department of Defense is free from source-bashing.

Unless, of course, there's a Republican in the Oval Office. Ever used a .gov link to support a point you've ever made, Rich? Yes, that's a rhetorical question.

I can hear the howls now: "Obama hater", "anti-govt whack job", blah, blah....

Well, you and your buddy here do hate Obama and you do hate the government. Whack job would be an unnecessary insult.

You're right Hawk, I have used a .gov source to support debates in the past. But the more I see of the twisted path govt takes to achieve its end, the less I trust. Not so long ago, that banner used to be heavily supported on the left. Amazing to watch a transition to fealty now that the left envisions its path to eternal power via govt dependency.

R or D in power makes no difference. Govt's existence goes hand-in-hand with its desire to expand and control by any means.

Anyone who trusts a govt lead by a man who said "if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor", or "My position hasn’t changed" on using executive authority to address immigration issues, or "The vast majority of the money I got (for his campaign) was from small donors all across the country.'', or "If you’ve got a business — you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen", or "People don’t remember, but when I came into office, the United States in world opinion ranked below China and just barely above Russia, and today once again, the United States is the most respected country on earth.”, or "Here’s what happened. . . . You had a video that was released by somebody who lives here, sort of a shadowy character who — who made an extremely offensive video directed at — at Mohammed....."

Like or dislike him, trusting a govt lead by such an accomplished liar would be questionable at best.

Obama administration busted for manipulating DIA Analyst's data ion ISIS:

Inquiry Weighs Whether ISIS Analysis Was Distorted
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/26/world/middleeast/pentagon-investigates-allegations-of-skewed-intelligence-reports-on-isis.html?_r=3

Exclusive: 50 Spies Say ISIS Intelligence Was Cooked
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/09/09/exclusive-50-spies-say-isis-intelligence-was-cooked.html

CBS News affirmation of ISIS data manipulation included.

Dozens of intelligence analysts reportedly claim assessments of ISIS were altered
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/09/10/dozens-intelligence-analysts-reportedly-claim-reports-on-isis-were-altered.html

Is Someone Politicizing Intelligence on ISIS?
http://politicalviolenceataglance.org/2015/08/28/is-the-us-military-artificially-optimistic-about-the-war-against-isis/

The above details a problem within the military. I wonder how long they've been doing this and whether the Vietnam, Iraq and Afghan wars were investigated.

_______________________________________________________________________

Obama administration busted for manipulating DIA Analyst's data on ISIS.

You comment is nothing more than deflection and is irrelevant to the issue at hand.

Obama administration busted for manipulating DIA Analyst's data ion ISIS:

Inquiry Weighs Whether ISIS Analysis Was Distorted
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/26/world/middleeast/pentagon-investigates-allegations-of-skewed-intelligence-reports-on-isis.html?_r=3

Exclusive: 50 Spies Say ISIS Intelligence Was Cooked
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/09/09/exclusive-50-spies-say-isis-intelligence-was-cooked.html

CBS News affirmation of ISIS data manipulation included.

Dozens of intelligence analysts reportedly claim assessments of ISIS were altered
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/09/10/dozens-intelligence-analysts-reportedly-claim-reports-on-isis-were-altered.html

Is Someone Politicizing Intelligence on ISIS?
http://politicalviolenceataglance.org/2015/08/28/is-the-us-military-artificially-optimistic-about-the-war-against-isis/

The above details a problem within the military. I wonder how long they've been doing this and whether the Vietnam, Iraq and Afghan wars were investigated.

_______________________________________________________________________

Obama administration busted for manipulating DIA Analyst's data on ISIS.

You comment is nothing more than deflection and is irrelevant to the issue at hand.

None of those articles state that Obama did anything but perhaps receive doctored results. Your sources simply do not support your allegations.

Obama administration busted for manipulating DIA Analyst's data ion ISIS:

Inquiry Weighs Whether ISIS Analysis Was Distorted
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/26/world/middleeast/pentagon-investigates-allegations-of-skewed-intelligence-reports-on-isis.html?_r=3

Exclusive: 50 Spies Say ISIS Intelligence Was Cooked
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/09/09/exclusive-50-spies-say-isis-intelligence-was-cooked.html

CBS News affirmation of ISIS data manipulation included.

Dozens of intelligence analysts reportedly claim assessments of ISIS were altered
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/09/10/dozens-intelligence-analysts-reportedly-claim-reports-on-isis-were-altered.html

Is Someone Politicizing Intelligence on ISIS?
http://politicalviolenceataglance.org/2015/08/28/is-the-us-military-artificially-optimistic-about-the-war-against-isis/

The above details a problem within the military. I wonder how long they've been doing this and whether the Vietnam, Iraq and Afghan wars were investigated.

_______________________________________________________________________

Obama administration busted for manipulating DIA Analyst's data on ISIS.

You comment is nothing more than deflection and is irrelevant to the issue at hand.

None of those articles state that Obama did anything but perhaps receive doctored results. Your sources simply do not support your allegations.

_____________________________________________________________________

The DIA Analysts data was manipulated by The Obama administration and then the altered information was given to The Pentagon to publish. Three of Obama's now former Sec. of Defense have said so publicly and two of them in their books.

Get informed son.

So from the same Administration to which stories abound of doctored intelligence and military reports that "enhance" our accomplishments to feed the narrative, we're supposed to take this on face value?

I have little doubt that we're handling the bulk of the effort. I also have little doubt that a lot of these accomplishments may be dubious at best.

I can hear the howls now: "Obama hater", "anti-govt whack job", blah, blah....

Distrust of govt-provided info is a healthy thing

I hope Obama doesn't anounce that ISIL is under control or contained. Terror attacks usually follow these pronouncements very quickly.

I hope Obama doesn't anounce that ISIL is under control or contained. Terror attacks usually follow these pronouncements very quickly.

Your attempt at linkage is based on nothing other than your disdain for the president.

Does anyone really think sending US ground troops into Syria and back to Iraq to fight ISIS is a good idea? Sending 170,000 troops to Iraq simply wasted 1.7 trillion dollars (2.2 if you include healthcare costs going down the road for wounded vets), lost almost 4500 US servicemen, and traded a stable Iraq (governed by a bad guy) for an unstable Iraq, whose central government is influenced more by Tehran than by us. Also ISIS was born during that conflict. I'm quite sure sending in troops again won't accomplish much, will cost a lot in lives and money and will have unintended consequences.

We do maintain a significant presence in the region. SF and airstrikes help blunt the growth of ISIS while minimizing our cost in lives and treasure. Right now, ISIS is losing territory. We still have a carrier group in the region. That's not going to change before this decade ends. We have significant assets and capability in the arena. They are being used and will continue to be used. Hopefully, not to mount another full scale invasion, though.

Does anyone really think sending US ground troops into Syria and back to Iraq to fight ISIS is a good idea? Sending 170,000 troops to Iraq simply wasted 1.7 trillion dollars (2.2 if you include healthcare costs going down the road for wounded vets), lost almost 4500 US servicemen, and traded a stable Iraq (governed by a bad guy) for an unstable Iraq, whose central government is influenced more by Tehran than by us. Also ISIS was born during that conflict. I'm quite sure sending in troops again won't accomplish much, will cost a lot in lives and money and will have unintended consequences.

We do maintain a significant presence in the region. SF and airstrikes help blunt the growth of ISIS while minimizing our cost in lives and treasure. Right now, ISIS is losing territory. We still have a carrier group in the region. That's not going to change before this decade ends. We have significant assets and capability in the arena. They are being used and will continue to be used. Hopefully, not to mount another full scale invasion, though.

We're going back into Iraq. Count on it.

Does anyone really think sending US ground troops into Syria and back to Iraq to fight ISIS is a good idea? Sending 170,000 troops to Iraq simply wasted 1.7 trillion dollars (2.2 if you include healthcare costs going down the road for wounded vets), lost almost 4500 US servicemen, and traded a stable Iraq (governed by a bad guy) for an unstable Iraq, whose central government is influenced more by Tehran than by us. Also ISIS was born during that conflict. I'm quite sure sending in troops again won't accomplish much, will cost a lot in lives and money and will have unintended consequences.

We do maintain a significant presence in the region. SF and airstrikes help blunt the growth of ISIS while minimizing our cost in lives and treasure. Right now, ISIS is losing territory. We still have a carrier group in the region. That's not going to change before this decade ends. We have significant assets and capability in the arena. They are being used and will continue to be used. Hopefully, not to mount another full scale invasion, though.

_________________________________________________________________________

"We still have a carrier group in the region"

Wrong again son.
Obama the Coward has pulled our last carrier group out of the Mediterranean.
The USS Theodore Roosevelt has been ordered home and is in transit.

Your ignorance of current information yet again proves your posts to be crap.

I hope Obama doesn't anounce that ISIL is under control or contained. Terror attacks usually follow these pronouncements very quickly.

Your attempt at linkage is based on nothing other than your disdain for the president.

The good or bad news is that we'll be able to continue reading all of his usual negative posts & disdain for 4 or 8 more years.

Does anyone really think sending US ground troops into Syria and back to Iraq to fight ISIS is a good idea? Sending 170,000 troops to Iraq simply wasted 1.7 trillion dollars (2.2 if you include healthcare costs going down the road for wounded vets), lost almost 4500 US servicemen, and traded a stable Iraq (governed by a bad guy) for an unstable Iraq, whose central government is influenced more by Tehran than by us. Also ISIS was born during that conflict. I'm quite sure sending in troops again won't accomplish much, will cost a lot in lives and money and will have unintended consequences.

We do maintain a significant presence in the region. SF and airstrikes help blunt the growth of ISIS while minimizing our cost in lives and treasure. Right now, ISIS is losing territory. We still have a carrier group in the region. That's not going to change before this decade ends. We have significant assets and capability in the arena. They are being used and will continue to be used. Hopefully, not to mount another full scale invasion, though.

_________________________________________________________________________

"We still have a carrier group in the region"

Wrong again son.
Obama the Coward has pulled our last carrier group out of the Mediterranean.
The USS Theodore Roosevelt has been ordered home and is in transit.

Your ignorance of current information yet again proves your posts to be crap.

You are just plain wrong or intentionally lying, I don't care which.

Wrong again son.
Obama the Coward has pulled our last carrier group out of the Mediterranean.
The USS Theodore Roosevelt has been ordered home and is in transit.

Your ignorance of current information yet again proves your posts to be crap.

Commie! Pinko! TRAITOR!!!

Does anyone really think sending US ground troops into Syria and back to Iraq to fight ISIS is a good idea? Sending 170,000 troops to Iraq simply wasted 1.7 trillion dollars (2.2 if you include healthcare costs going down the road for wounded vets), lost almost 4500 US servicemen, and traded a stable Iraq (governed by a bad guy) for an unstable Iraq, whose central government is influenced more by Tehran than by us. Also ISIS was born during that conflict. I'm quite sure sending in troops again won't accomplish much, will cost a lot in lives and money and will have unintended consequences.

We do maintain a significant presence in the region. SF and airstrikes help blunt the growth of ISIS while minimizing our cost in lives and treasure. Right now, ISIS is losing territory. We still have a carrier group in the region. That's not going to change before this decade ends. We have significant assets and capability in the arena. They are being used and will continue to be used. Hopefully, not to mount another full scale invasion, though.

_________________________________________________________________________

"We still have a carrier group in the region"

Wrong again son.
Obama the Coward has pulled our last carrier group out of the Mediterranean.
The USS Theodore Roosevelt has been ordered home and is in transit.

Your ignorance of current information yet again proves your posts to be crap.

Your ignorance of why the carrier returned to the US yet again proves that you are a clueless liar.

http://news.usni.org/2015/10/13/carrier-uss-theodore-roosevelt-chops-out-of-u-s-5th-fleet-no-firm-date-on-replacement-to-continue-anti-isis-strikes

Previous CSG and three-ship Amphibious Ready Group deployments were often extended to meet the demand of U.S. geographic combatant commanders (COCOMs) at the expense of maintenance setbacks and crew fatigue.

Within the last two years the Navy has retooled its deployment patterns to engineer more predictability in maintenance schedules for the ships and deployment schedules for sailors and Marines.

The emerging Optimized Fleet Response Plan would set a goal of seven-month carrier deployments as a part of a 36-month cycle to allow the crew, ships and aircraft of the CSG enough time to reset between deployments.

The Roosevelt and Truman deployments are not covered by OFRP but are keeping to a stricter schedule of deployments as the Navy is resisting urges to extend carrier deployments while the service catches up with a growing backlog of deferred maintenance

This has nothing to do with Obama.

Obama administration busted for manipulating DIA Analyst's data ion ISIS:

Inquiry Weighs Whether ISIS Analysis Was Distorted
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/26/world/middleeast/pentagon-investigates-allegations-of-skewed-intelligence-reports-on-isis.html?_r=3

Exclusive: 50 Spies Say ISIS Intelligence Was Cooked
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/09/09/exclusive-50-spies-say-isis-intelligence-was-cooked.html

CBS News affirmation of ISIS data manipulation included.

Dozens of intelligence analysts reportedly claim assessments of ISIS were altered
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/09/10/dozens-intelligence-analysts-reportedly-claim-reports-on-isis-were-altered.html

Is Someone Politicizing Intelligence on ISIS?
http://politicalviolenceataglance.org/2015/08/28/is-the-us-military-artificially-optimistic-about-the-war-against-isis/

The above details a problem within the military. I wonder how long they've been doing this and whether the Vietnam, Iraq and Afghan wars were investigated.

_______________________________________________________________________

Obama administration busted for manipulating DIA Analyst's data on ISIS.

You comment is nothing more than deflection and is irrelevant to the issue at hand.

None of those articles state that Obama did anything but perhaps receive doctored results. Your sources simply do not support your allegations.

_____________________________________________________________________

The DIA Analysts data was manipulated by The Obama administration and then the altered information was given to The Pentagon to publish. Three of Obama's now former Sec. of Defense have said so publicly and two of them in their books.

Get informed son.

Surprised you've read these books. You should cite them with quotes if they support your argument here. Since you have not done this you still lose.

The Pew Poll found that 63 million Muslims support the Islamic State in the eleven Muslim countries.
up to 14 percent of the population has a favorable opinion of ISIS, and upwards of 62 percent “don’t know” whether or not they have a favorable opinion of the Islamist group.

For these 11 nation-states alone, the favorability ratings for ISIS reported by the Pew poll are indicative of at least 63 million ISIS supporters – and potentially upwards of 287 million if the undecided are included in the calculation.

http://www.infowars.com/pew-poll-63-million-muslims-support-isis-in-eleven-countries/

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/11/pew_poll_between_63_million_and_287_million_isis_supporters_in_just_11_countries.html

So what is the strategy, kill every Muslim just in case they change their minds from the "I Don't know" category to yeah they are right, I can't say that I like my humiliated life. By the way there are 8 million declared Muslims in the US. Should they be deported, or sent to concentration camps like the Japanese were after Japan attacked Pearl Harbor?

Got to start thinking in the long run.

[Edited on 11/21/2015 by gina]

Obama administration busted for manipulating DIA Analyst's data ion ISIS:

Inquiry Weighs Whether ISIS Analysis Was Distorted
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/26/world/middleeast/pentagon-investigates-allegations-of-skewed-intelligence-reports-on-isis.html?_r=3

Exclusive: 50 Spies Say ISIS Intelligence Was Cooked
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/09/09/exclusive-50-spies-say-isis-intelligence-was-cooked.html

CBS News affirmation of ISIS data manipulation included.

Dozens of intelligence analysts reportedly claim assessments of ISIS were altered
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/09/10/dozens-intelligence-analysts-reportedly-claim-reports-on-isis-were-altered.html

Is Someone Politicizing Intelligence on ISIS?
http://politicalviolenceataglance.org/2015/08/28/is-the-us-military-artificially-optimistic-about-the-war-against-isis/

The above details a problem within the military. I wonder how long they've been doing this and whether the Vietnam, Iraq and Afghan wars were investigated.

_______________________________________________________________________

Obama administration busted for manipulating DIA Analyst's data on ISIS.

You comment is nothing more than deflection and is irrelevant to the issue at hand.

None of those articles state that Obama did anything but perhaps receive doctored results. Your sources simply do not support your allegations.

_____________________________________________________________________

The DIA Analysts data was manipulated by The Obama administration and then the altered information was given to The Pentagon to publish. Three of Obama's now former Sec. of Defense have said so publicly and two of them in their books.

Get informed son.

Surprised you've read these books. You should cite them with quotes if they support your argument here. Since you have not done this you still lose.

________________________________________________________________________

Proving yet again you cannot read and understand the content.
Get informed son.

Obama administration busted for manipulating DIA Analyst's data ion ISIS:

Inquiry Weighs Whether ISIS Analysis Was Distorted
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/26/world/middleeast/pentagon-investigates-allegations-of-skewed-intelligence-reports-on-isis.html?_r=3

Exclusive: 50 Spies Say ISIS Intelligence Was Cooked
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/09/09/exclusive-50-spies-say-isis-intelligence-was-cooked.html

CBS News affirmation of ISIS data manipulation included.

Dozens of intelligence analysts reportedly claim assessments of ISIS were altered
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/09/10/dozens-intelligence-analysts-reportedly-claim-reports-on-isis-were-altered.html

Is Someone Politicizing Intelligence on ISIS?
http://politicalviolenceataglance.org/2015/08/28/is-the-us-military-artificially-optimistic-about-the-war-against-isis/

The above details a problem within the military. I wonder how long they've been doing this and whether the Vietnam, Iraq and Afghan wars were investigated.

_______________________________________________________________________

Obama administration busted for manipulating DIA Analyst's data on ISIS.

You comment is nothing more than deflection and is irrelevant to the issue at hand.

None of those articles state that Obama did anything but perhaps receive doctored results. Your sources simply do not support your allegations.

_____________________________________________________________________

The DIA Analysts data was manipulated by The Obama administration and then the altered information was given to The Pentagon to publish. Three of Obama's now former Sec. of Defense have said so publicly and two of them in their books.

Get informed son.

Surprised you've read these books. You should cite them with quotes if they support your argument here. Since you have not done this you still lose.

________________________________________________________________________

Proving yet again you cannot read and understand the content.
Get informed son.

Do you mean things like reading the reason the USS Theodore Roosevelt was sent home? That took me about 30 seconds to research and post. And you didn't even take the time to thank me for doing your research for you. You are one lazy ignorant clown. 😛

Obama administration busted for manipulating DIA Analyst's data ion ISIS:

Inquiry Weighs Whether ISIS Analysis Was Distorted
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/26/world/middleeast/pentagon-investigates-allegations-of-skewed-intelligence-reports-on-isis.html?_r=3

Exclusive: 50 Spies Say ISIS Intelligence Was Cooked
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/09/09/exclusive-50-spies-say-isis-intelligence-was-cooked.html

CBS News affirmation of ISIS data manipulation included.

Dozens of intelligence analysts reportedly claim assessments of ISIS were altered
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/09/10/dozens-intelligence-analysts-reportedly-claim-reports-on-isis-were-altered.html

Is Someone Politicizing Intelligence on ISIS?
http://politicalviolenceataglance.org/2015/08/28/is-the-us-military-artificially-optimistic-about-the-war-against-isis/

The above details a problem within the military. I wonder how long they've been doing this and whether the Vietnam, Iraq and Afghan wars were investigated.

_______________________________________________________________________

Obama administration busted for manipulating DIA Analyst's data on ISIS.

You comment is nothing more than deflection and is irrelevant to the issue at hand.

None of those articles state that Obama did anything but perhaps receive doctored results. Your sources simply do not support your allegations.

_____________________________________________________________________

The DIA Analysts data was manipulated by The Obama administration and then the altered information was given to The Pentagon to publish. Three of Obama's now former Sec. of Defense have said so publicly and two of them in their books.

Get informed son.

Surprised you've read these books. You should cite them with quotes if they support your argument here. Since you have not done this you still lose.

________________________________________________________________________

Proving yet again you cannot read and understand the content.
Get informed son.

Do you mean things like reading the reason the USS Theodore Roosevelt was sent home? That took me about 30 seconds to research and post. And you didn't even take the time to thank me for doing your research for you. You are one lazy ignorant clown. 😛

________________________________________________________________________

"Do you mean things like reading the reason the USS Theodore Roosevelt was sent home?"

Obama has pulled all three carrier groups from the Middle East.
The cover story of "maintenance" is the Obama administration's spin of Obama's latest cut and run.
If you had actually researched the reason you would have seen that The Big Stick had three more months of deployment capability.

Try again son.

Obama administration busted for manipulating DIA Analyst's data ion ISIS:

Inquiry Weighs Whether ISIS Analysis Was Distorted
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/26/world/middleeast/pentagon-investigates-allegations-of-skewed-intelligence-reports-on-isis.html?_r=3

Exclusive: 50 Spies Say ISIS Intelligence Was Cooked
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/09/09/exclusive-50-spies-say-isis-intelligence-was-cooked.html

CBS News affirmation of ISIS data manipulation included.

Dozens of intelligence analysts reportedly claim assessments of ISIS were altered
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/09/10/dozens-intelligence-analysts-reportedly-claim-reports-on-isis-were-altered.html

Is Someone Politicizing Intelligence on ISIS?
http://politicalviolenceataglance.org/2015/08/28/is-the-us-military-artificially-optimistic-about-the-war-against-isis/

The above details a problem within the military. I wonder how long they've been doing this and whether the Vietnam, Iraq and Afghan wars were investigated.

_______________________________________________________________________

Obama administration busted for manipulating DIA Analyst's data on ISIS.

You comment is nothing more than deflection and is irrelevant to the issue at hand.

None of those articles state that Obama did anything but perhaps receive doctored results. Your sources simply do not support your allegations.

_____________________________________________________________________

The DIA Analysts data was manipulated by The Obama administration and then the altered information was given to The Pentagon to publish. Three of Obama's now former Sec. of Defense have said so publicly and two of them in their books.

Get informed son.

Surprised you've read these books. You should cite them with quotes if they support your argument here. Since you have not done this you still lose.

________________________________________________________________________

Proving yet again you cannot read and understand the content.
Get informed son.

Do you mean things like reading the reason the USS Theodore Roosevelt was sent home? That took me about 30 seconds to research and post. And you didn't even take the time to thank me for doing your research for you. You are one lazy ignorant clown. 😛

________________________________________________________________________

"Do you mean things like reading the reason the USS Theodore Roosevelt was sent home?"

Obama has pulled all three carrier groups from the Middle East.
The cover story of "maintenance" is the Obama administration's spin of Obama's latest cut and run.
If you had actually researched the reason you would have seen that The Big Stick had three more months of deployment capability.

Try again son.

If you really had evidence of that, you would have posted the link. It is much easier for you to dismiss and lie. Too bad you were caught lying again. SSDD.

Obama administration busted for manipulating DIA Analyst's data ion ISIS:

Inquiry Weighs Whether ISIS Analysis Was Distorted
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/26/world/middleeast/pentagon-investigates-allegations-of-skewed-intelligence-reports-on-isis.html?_r=3

Exclusive: 50 Spies Say ISIS Intelligence Was Cooked
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/09/09/exclusive-50-spies-say-isis-intelligence-was-cooked.html

CBS News affirmation of ISIS data manipulation included.

Dozens of intelligence analysts reportedly claim assessments of ISIS were altered
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/09/10/dozens-intelligence-analysts-reportedly-claim-reports-on-isis-were-altered.html

Is Someone Politicizing Intelligence on ISIS?
http://politicalviolenceataglance.org/2015/08/28/is-the-us-military-artificially-optimistic-about-the-war-against-isis/

The above details a problem within the military. I wonder how long they've been doing this and whether the Vietnam, Iraq and Afghan wars were investigated.

_______________________________________________________________________

Obama administration busted for manipulating DIA Analyst's data on ISIS.

You comment is nothing more than deflection and is irrelevant to the issue at hand.

None of those articles state that Obama did anything but perhaps receive doctored results. Your sources simply do not support your allegations.

_____________________________________________________________________

The DIA Analysts data was manipulated by The Obama administration and then the altered information was given to The Pentagon to publish. Three of Obama's now former Sec. of Defense have said so publicly and two of them in their books.

Get informed son.

Surprised you've read these books. You should cite them with quotes if they support your argument here. Since you have not done this you still lose.

________________________________________________________________________

Proving yet again you cannot read and understand the content.
Get informed son.

Do you mean things like reading the reason the USS Theodore Roosevelt was sent home? That took me about 30 seconds to research and post. And you didn't even take the time to thank me for doing your research for you. You are one lazy ignorant clown. 😛

________________________________________________________________________

"Do you mean things like reading the reason the USS Theodore Roosevelt was sent home?"

Obama has pulled all three carrier groups from the Middle East.
The cover story of "maintenance" is the Obama administration's spin of Obama's latest cut and run.
If you had actually researched the reason you would have seen that The Big Stick had three more months of deployment capability.

Try again son.

If you really had evidence of that, you would have posted the link. It is much easier for you to dismiss and lie. Too bad you were caught lying again. SSDD.

_________________________________________________________________________

Article published in The Navy Times.
The link is up to the one challenging facts they were unable to research.
I'm happy to spoon feed a baby but not an idiot.

Try again son.

Obama administration busted for manipulating DIA Analyst's data ion ISIS:

Inquiry Weighs Whether ISIS Analysis Was Distorted
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/26/world/middleeast/pentagon-investigates-allegations-of-skewed-intelligence-reports-on-isis.html?_r=3

Exclusive: 50 Spies Say ISIS Intelligence Was Cooked
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/09/09/exclusive-50-spies-say-isis-intelligence-was-cooked.html

CBS News affirmation of ISIS data manipulation included.

Dozens of intelligence analysts reportedly claim assessments of ISIS were altered
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/09/10/dozens-intelligence-analysts-reportedly-claim-reports-on-isis-were-altered.html

Is Someone Politicizing Intelligence on ISIS?
http://politicalviolenceataglance.org/2015/08/28/is-the-us-military-artificially-optimistic-about-the-war-against-isis/

The above details a problem within the military. I wonder how long they've been doing this and whether the Vietnam, Iraq and Afghan wars were investigated.

_______________________________________________________________________

Obama administration busted for manipulating DIA Analyst's data on ISIS.

You comment is nothing more than deflection and is irrelevant to the issue at hand.

None of those articles state that Obama did anything but perhaps receive doctored results. Your sources simply do not support your allegations.

_____________________________________________________________________

The DIA Analysts data was manipulated by The Obama administration and then the altered information was given to The Pentagon to publish. Three of Obama's now former Sec. of Defense have said so publicly and two of them in their books.

Get informed son.

Surprised you've read these books. You should cite them with quotes if they support your argument here. Since you have not done this you still lose.

________________________________________________________________________

Proving yet again you cannot read and understand the content.
Get informed son.

Do you mean things like reading the reason the USS Theodore Roosevelt was sent home? That took me about 30 seconds to research and post. And you didn't even take the time to thank me for doing your research for you. You are one lazy ignorant clown. 😛

________________________________________________________________________

"Do you mean things like reading the reason the USS Theodore Roosevelt was sent home?"

Obama has pulled all three carrier groups from the Middle East.
The cover story of "maintenance" is the Obama administration's spin of Obama's latest cut and run.
If you had actually researched the reason you would have seen that The Big Stick had three more months of deployment capability.

Try again son.

If you really had evidence of that, you would have posted the link. It is much easier for you to dismiss and lie. Too bad you were caught lying again. SSDD.

_________________________________________________________________________

Article published in The Navy Times.
The link is up to the one challenging facts they were unable to research.
I'm happy to spoon feed a baby but not an idiot.

Try again son.

I went to The Navy Times web site. I searched the site for USS Theodore Roosevelt. There were 6 hits. The most recent story was from January. There was nothing about the carriers return to the US or anything about Obama. Nice try, wrong again.

You seem to think that you can make stuff up and the rest of us won't check it out. The fact that you haven't learned that you can't do that and get away with it shows you in a very bad light. But you knew that already. 😛