Has President Trump fired Mueller? - no
Has President Trump threatened to fire Mueller? - no

Has Mueller presented any document, evidence or witness that ties Candidate/President Trump to any criminal activity involving the Russians? - no

The upside is that there is mounting documented evidence of criminal activity by Obama officials with the Russians.

Well, you were correct with the first answer. After that, not so much.

X2

A Google search reveals many hits even though most of us already knew Trump's desire to fire Mueller.

"Trump Ordered Mueller Fired, but Backed Off When White House Counsel Threatened to Quit"

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/25/us/politics/trump-mueller-special-counsel-russia.html

"most of us already knew Trump's desire to fire Mueller"
If you get your opinion from NYT of course you would think that is factual.

The NYT is one of the leading corrupt liberal media outlets.
They, just like Mueller, has been taunting president Trump to fire Mueller.

President Trump knows better.

Why should he fire Mueller when Mueller has nothing.
(If he did it would have long ago leaked)

Even Trump's #1 fluffer Hannity confirmed (reluctantly) that Trump tried to fire Mueller last June, right before trying to distract his viewers with a car chase:

Keep spinning son.

The fact remains that Mueller has confirmed that President Trump is not under criminal investigation.

Has President Trump fired Mueller? - no
Has President Trump threatened to fire Mueller? - no

Has Mueller presented any document, evidence or witness that ties Candidate/President Trump to any criminal activity involving the Russians? - no

The upside is that there is mounting documented evidence of criminal activity by Obama officials with the Russians.

Well, you were correct with the first answer. After that, not so much.

X2

A Google search reveals many hits even though most of us already knew Trump's desire to fire Mueller.

"Trump Ordered Mueller Fired, but Backed Off When White House Counsel Threatened to Quit"

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/25/us/politics/trump-mueller-special-counsel-russia.html

"most of us already knew Trump's desire to fire Mueller"
If you get your opinion from NYT of course you would think that is factual.

The NYT is one of the leading corrupt liberal media outlets.
They, just like Mueller, has been taunting president Trump to fire Mueller.

President Trump knows better.

Why should he fire Mueller when Mueller has nothing.
(If he did it would have long ago leaked)

Even Trump's #1 fluffer Hannity confirmed (reluctantly) that Trump tried to fire Mueller last June, right before trying to distract his viewers with a car chase:

Keep spinning son.

The fact remains that Mueller has confirmed that President Trump is not under criminal investigation.

That isn’t what he said. He said Trump was not the target of the investigation. He did say that Trump was a subject. That means he is considered a witness, participant or informant. You can eliminate informant.

Has President Trump fired Mueller? - no
Has President Trump threatened to fire Mueller? - no

Has Mueller presented any document, evidence or witness that ties Candidate/President Trump to any criminal activity involving the Russians? - no

The upside is that there is mounting documented evidence of criminal activity by Obama officials with the Russians.

Well, you were correct with the first answer. After that, not so much.

X2

A Google search reveals many hits even though most of us already knew Trump's desire to fire Mueller.

"Trump Ordered Mueller Fired, but Backed Off When White House Counsel Threatened to Quit"

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/25/us/politics/trump-mueller-special-counsel-russia.html

"most of us already knew Trump's desire to fire Mueller"
If you get your opinion from NYT of course you would think that is factual.

The NYT is one of the leading corrupt liberal media outlets.
They, just like Mueller, has been taunting president Trump to fire Mueller.

President Trump knows better.

Why should he fire Mueller when Mueller has nothing.
(If he did it would have long ago leaked)

Even Trump's #1 fluffer Hannity confirmed (reluctantly) that Trump tried to fire Mueller last June, right before trying to distract his viewers with a car chase:

Keep spinning son.

The fact remains that Mueller has confirmed that President Trump is not under criminal investigation.

That isn’t what he said. He said Trump was not the target of the investigation. He did say that Trump was a subject. That means he is considered a witness, participant or informant. You can eliminate informant.

You are too stupid to know what the spin means.

Fact: Mueller has confirmed that President Trump is not under criminal investigation.

That is the only information that was leaked by the Mueller probe.
Everything else is the spin from the corrupt liberal media.

Fact:

Has President Trump fired Mueller? - no
Has President Trump threatened to fire Mueller? - no

Has Mueller presented any document, evidence or witness that ties Candidate/President Trump to any criminal activity involving the Russians? - no

The upside is that there is mounting documented evidence of criminal activity by Obama officials with the Russians.

Well, you were correct with the first answer. After that, not so much.

X2

A Google search reveals many hits even though most of us already knew Trump's desire to fire Mueller.

"Trump Ordered Mueller Fired, but Backed Off When White House Counsel Threatened to Quit"

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/25/us/politics/trump-mueller-special-counsel-russia.html

"most of us already knew Trump's desire to fire Mueller"
If you get your opinion from NYT of course you would think that is factual.

The NYT is one of the leading corrupt liberal media outlets.
They, just like Mueller, has been taunting president Trump to fire Mueller.

President Trump knows better.

Why should he fire Mueller when Mueller has nothing.
(If he did it would have long ago leaked)

Even Trump's #1 fluffer Hannity confirmed (reluctantly) that Trump tried to fire Mueller last June, right before trying to distract his viewers with a car chase:

Keep spinning son.

The fact remains that Mueller has confirmed that President Trump is not under criminal investigation.

That isn’t what he said. He said Trump was not the target of the investigation. He did say that Trump was a subject. That means he is considered a witness, participant or informant. You can eliminate informant.

You are too stupid to know what the spin means.

Fact: Mueller has confirmed that President Trump is not under criminal investigation.

That is the only information that was leaked by the Mueller probe.
Everything else is the spin from the corrupt liberal media.

Fact:

Mule starts with the personal attacks again. In other words, he can't answer.

Has President Trump fired Mueller? - no
Has President Trump threatened to fire Mueller? - no

Has Mueller presented any document, evidence or witness that ties Candidate/President Trump to any criminal activity involving the Russians? - no

The upside is that there is mounting documented evidence of criminal activity by Obama officials with the Russians.

Well, you were correct with the first answer. After that, not so much.

X2

A Google search reveals many hits even though most of us already knew Trump's desire to fire Mueller.

"Trump Ordered Mueller Fired, but Backed Off When White House Counsel Threatened to Quit"

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/25/us/politics/trump-mueller-special-counsel-russia.html

"most of us already knew Trump's desire to fire Mueller"
If you get your opinion from NYT of course you would think that is factual.

The NYT is one of the leading corrupt liberal media outlets.
They, just like Mueller, has been taunting president Trump to fire Mueller.

President Trump knows better.

Why should he fire Mueller when Mueller has nothing.
(If he did it would have long ago leaked)

Even Trump's #1 fluffer Hannity confirmed (reluctantly) that Trump tried to fire Mueller last June, right before trying to distract his viewers with a car chase:

Keep spinning son.

The fact remains that Mueller has confirmed that President Trump is not under criminal investigation.

That isn’t what he said. He said Trump was not the target of the investigation. He did say that Trump was a subject. That means he is considered a witness, participant or informant. You can eliminate informant.

You are too stupid to know what the spin means.

Fact: Mueller has confirmed that President Trump is not under criminal investigation.

That is the only information that was leaked by the Mueller probe.
Everything else is the spin from the corrupt liberal media.

Fact:

Mule starts with the personal attacks again. In other words, he can't answer.

Cry baby.

The facts again destroy your far-left drivel.

Has President Trump fired Mueller? - no
Has President Trump threatened to fire Mueller? - no

Has Mueller presented any document, evidence or witness that ties Candidate/President Trump to any criminal activity involving the Russians? - no

The upside is that there is mounting documented evidence of criminal activity by Obama officials with the Russians.

Well, you were correct with the first answer. After that, not so much.

X2

A Google search reveals many hits even though most of us already knew Trump's desire to fire Mueller.

"Trump Ordered Mueller Fired, but Backed Off When White House Counsel Threatened to Quit"

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/25/us/politics/trump-mueller-special-counsel-russia.html

"most of us already knew Trump's desire to fire Mueller"
If you get your opinion from NYT of course you would think that is factual.

The NYT is one of the leading corrupt liberal media outlets.
They, just like Mueller, has been taunting president Trump to fire Mueller.

President Trump knows better.

Why should he fire Mueller when Mueller has nothing.
(If he did it would have long ago leaked)

Even Trump's #1 fluffer Hannity confirmed (reluctantly) that Trump tried to fire Mueller last June, right before trying to distract his viewers with a car chase:

Keep spinning son.

The fact remains that Mueller has confirmed that President Trump is not under criminal investigation.

That isn’t what he said. He said Trump was not the target of the investigation. He did say that Trump was a subject. That means he is considered a witness, participant or informant. You can eliminate informant.

You are too stupid to know what the spin means.

Fact: Mueller has confirmed that President Trump is not under criminal investigation.

That is the only information that was leaked by the Mueller probe.
Everything else is the spin from the corrupt liberal media.

Fact:

Mule starts with the personal attacks again. In other words, he can't answer.

Cry baby.

The facts again destroy your far-left drivel.

More name calling.

Has President Trump fired Mueller? - no
Has President Trump threatened to fire Mueller? - no

Has Mueller presented any document, evidence or witness that ties Candidate/President Trump to any criminal activity involving the Russians? - no

The upside is that there is mounting documented evidence of criminal activity by Obama officials with the Russians.

Well, you were correct with the first answer. After that, not so much.

X2

A Google search reveals many hits even though most of us already knew Trump's desire to fire Mueller.

"Trump Ordered Mueller Fired, but Backed Off When White House Counsel Threatened to Quit"

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/25/us/politics/trump-mueller-special-counsel-russia.html

"most of us already knew Trump's desire to fire Mueller"
If you get your opinion from NYT of course you would think that is factual.

The NYT is one of the leading corrupt liberal media outlets.
They, just like Mueller, has been taunting president Trump to fire Mueller.

President Trump knows better.

Why should he fire Mueller when Mueller has nothing.
(If he did it would have long ago leaked)

Even Trump's #1 fluffer Hannity confirmed (reluctantly) that Trump tried to fire Mueller last June, right before trying to distract his viewers with a car chase:

Keep spinning son.

The fact remains that Mueller has confirmed that President Trump is not under criminal investigation.

That isn’t what he said. He said Trump was not the target of the investigation. He did say that Trump was a subject. That means he is considered a witness, participant or informant. You can eliminate informant.

You are too stupid to know what the spin means.

Fact: Mueller has confirmed that President Trump is not under criminal investigation.

That is the only information that was leaked by the Mueller probe.
Everything else is the spin from the corrupt liberal media.

Fact:

Mule starts with the personal attacks again. In other words, he can't answer.

Cry baby.

The facts again destroy your far-left drivel.

More name calling.

At this point it's all troll boy has.

His hero is going down in flames and he's too effn stoopid/stubborn to admit it.