No, you need to read more carefully - he's his bother ...... whatever that is...... 😛
Obama bothers the Ayatollah in the same way that Muleman bothers all of us.
Muleman is our bother.
Muleman is our bother
.... He ain't heavy, he's my bother
Whipping Post: A Musical Tragedy
You are still a racist and a liar.
And you're a Holocaust denier . . .
(orchestra starts number)
You're a coward and a fraud,
And your views are pretty odd,
And you can't decide upon,
KKK or Farrraaakhaaan.....You're a nazi and a kraut,
And your president's a lout,
And you have zero class,
Because you can't wash your aaaaaassssss...We drift and wail like the lost and damned,
Did you just see that ghost?
No my friend that's just the Klan,
Haunting the Whipping Pooooost....The known deniers are the Ayatollah of Iran, his bother Obama and Ex-Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney (D).
However since you are having difficulty remembering where you are, this thread is "Mueller confirms President Trump is not under criminal investigation"
What did President Obama do that was so bad that you consider him the "brother" of the "Ayatollah of Iran"? While I don't consider him Harry Truman or Ronald Reagan, he guided the country through some extreme economic times and for me personally, he got Bin Laden. In addition, he acted with civility.
What did President Obama do that was so bad that you consider him the "brother" of the "Ayatollah of Iran"?
He posed a threat to insecure white America who found out they ain’t as superior as they thought. They got scared of a level playing field, and scared of the possibility of being outworked and outsmarted by a brown person, scared that their white safe space was coming to an end, scared that their skills won’t be enough to survive. Sad!
Whipping Post: A Musical Tragedy
You are still a racist and a liar.
And you're a Holocaust denier . . .
(orchestra starts number)
You're a coward and a fraud,
And your views are pretty odd,
And you can't decide upon,
KKK or Farrraaakhaaan.....You're a nazi and a kraut,
And your president's a lout,
And you have zero class,
Because you can't wash your aaaaaassssss...We drift and wail like the lost and damned,
Did you just see that ghost?
No my friend that's just the Klan,
Haunting the Whipping Pooooost....The known deniers are the Ayatollah of Iran, his bother Obama and Ex-Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney (D).
However since you are having difficulty remembering where you are, this thread is "Mueller confirms President Trump is not under criminal investigation"
What did President Obama do that was so bad that you consider him the "brother" of the "Ayatollah of Iran"? While I don't consider him Harry Truman or Ronald Reagan, he guided the country through some extreme economic times and for me personally, he got Bin Laden. In addition, he acted with civility.
Obama routinely supported the Islamic Extremist Terrorists.
Seal Team 6 got Bin Laden acting on a plan begun under President George W. Bush.
Obama acted against the American People and our Constitution.
Why are we all using italics now?
Obama routinely supported the Islamic Extremist Terrorists.
Seal Team 6 got Bin Laden acting on a plan begun under President George W. Bush.
Obama acted against the American People and our Constitution.
Translation: I'm scared of being left in the dust by brown people who are more skilled than I am.
[Edited on 4/6/2018 by BoytonBrother]
Whipping Post: A Musical Tragedy
You are still a racist and a liar.
And you're a Holocaust denier . . .
(orchestra starts number)
You're a coward and a fraud,
And your views are pretty odd,
And you can't decide upon,
KKK or Farrraaakhaaan.....You're a nazi and a kraut,
And your president's a lout,
And you have zero class,
Because you can't wash your aaaaaassssss...We drift and wail like the lost and damned,
Did you just see that ghost?
No my friend that's just the Klan,
Haunting the Whipping Pooooost....The known deniers are the Ayatollah of Iran, his bother Obama and Ex-Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney (D).
However since you are having difficulty remembering where you are, this thread is "Mueller confirms President Trump is not under criminal investigation"
What did President Obama do that was so bad that you consider him the "brother" of the "Ayatollah of Iran"? While I don't consider him Harry Truman or Ronald Reagan, he guided the country through some extreme economic times and for me personally, he got Bin Laden. In addition, he acted with civility.
Obama routinely supported the Islamic Extremist Terrorists.
Seal Team 6 got Bin Laden acting on a plan begun under President George W. Bush.
Obama acted against the American People and our Constitution.
You come across as someone who is very bitter and inflexible. For your sake, I hope you have some joy in your life considering it goes quick.
Another beautiful, spring day here in California. Rode our bikes to lunch along our city's beautiful bike path. A few chores to do and then it's cocktail hour on the back patio. Cheers!
Talking about Obama in a thread about Trump.... Geeez SON, yer too stooopid to stick to the thread topic. Coward..
Wow now I understand why you post the way you do, this trolling stuff is pretty fun, now if only I had my peripheral vision obscured by a white hood I might be able to understand more about your ways.
Mueller confirms Presdient Trump is not under criminal investigation
Then why did they get THREE separate court orders to surveill him before he became President? This was proven. They never stop undermining him. Even with the most recent scandal (Stormy Daniels), they wanted to use that as grounds for impeachment claiming it influenced an election. They just could make that Russian collusion thing stick. The swamp's still pretty deep.
Mueller confirms Presdient Trump is not under criminal investigation
Then why did they get THREE separate court orders to surveill him before he became President? This was proven. They never stop undermining him. Even with the most recent scandal (Stormy Daniels), they wanted to use that as grounds for impeachment claiming it influenced an election. They just could make that Russian collusion thing stick. The swamp's still pretty deep.
You're right - "The swamp's still pretty deep." The swamp brought to DC is much much deeper than the swamp that existed prior to his arrival. One only needs to look at how he has used his office to profit. And look at those of his team that have left & their abuse of taxpayer funds. The good news is that Mr. Eco / Environment Friendly, Scott Pruitt and all his pureness is still at EPA. What a piece of trash that guy is, but he's playing follow the leader.
Not sure why this Stormy Daniels thing is getting so much attention when Trump said she's not his type. I mean, she wears a skirt...so am not sure what doesn't make her his type. But guess we'll have to take him at his word, because if he says something, then it must be true. There aren't many leaders in DC with better morals and ethics than Trump.
And yet “Mueller confirms President Trump is not under criminal investigation” remains true, there is no document, no evidence and no witnesses to the far-left extremists fake Putin/Trump collusion crap.
So, and as usual, the lefties here only post about things that have nothing to do with their phony claim.
It would seem that the left needs to dream up a new collusion/conspiracy fantasy to keep themselves entertained.
Stop crying about it already. Get a life.
Stop crying about it already. Get a life.
No crying at all son.
It is actually fun to watch the far-left extremists squirm.
This Washington Post report, according to 3 anonymous sources, suddenly has ample credibility among the rightists.
How convenient.
Which WAPO report are your referring to or are you just pulling your post out of your a$$ again?
BYW - "anonymous sources" is a term the corrupt liberal media uses when they are lying.
So what does Muleman do now? He rushed here to brag about this story not knowing it's WaPo's reporting based on completely anonymous sources. Seems like a conundrum. Here are some possible ways he can go from here:
1) Argue that the article is in fact NOT WaPo's reporting (how?)
2) Abandon the thread
3) Ignore my post and keep posting
4) Explain how WaPo was "real news" in this particular case but "fake news" in all others
5) Admit he was wrongOther possibilities?
You should know by now that anything that is negative about Trump is "Fake News." Anything good about him is reliable. This is all you need to know (because it is the only thing Mule knows). It's the Mule version of fact checking.
So what does Muleman do now? He rushed here to brag about this story not knowing it's WaPo's reporting based on completely anonymous sources. Seems like a conundrum. Here are some possible ways he can go from here:
1) Argue that the article is in fact NOT WaPo's reporting (how?)
2) Abandon the thread
3) Ignore my post and keep posting
4) Explain how WaPo was "real news" in this particular case but "fake news" in all others
5) Admit he was wrongOther possibilities?
"Other possibilities?"
He will insult you, & call you "son". That means you have many brothers here on this site who probably agree with you and disagree with him almost exclusively.
300,000 thousand will march if Muller gets fired? And 100,000 is Rosenstein gets fired.
More than 300,000 people have pledged to attend “rapid response” protests across the US, should Donald Trump fire special counsel Robert Mueller.
The activist website MoveOn said it had more than 800 “emergency” rallies around the country prepared if Trump dismisses Mueller, who is investigating whether there was collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.
Activists would spring into action within hours, MoveOn said, marching in cities and towns in each of the 50 states. The mass protest would also be triggered if Trump moved to replace the deputy attorney general, Rod Rosenstein – which could clear a path for Mueller to be fired – or if Trump pardoned key witnesses in the Russia investigation.
REMARKS: Well, now we know for sure who is behind all the problems, the group that funded all these other groups, THE GROUP. 300,000 will march on Washington if Mueller gets fired, WTF!
300,000 thousand will march if Muller gets fired? And 100,000 is Rosenstein gets fired.
More than 300,000 people have pledged to attend “rapid response” protests across the US, should Donald Trump fire special counsel Robert Mueller.
The activist website MoveOn said it had more than 800 “emergency” rallies around the country prepared if Trump dismisses Mueller, who is investigating whether there was collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.
Activists would spring into action within hours, MoveOn said, marching in cities and towns in each of the 50 states. The mass protest would also be triggered if Trump moved to replace the deputy attorney general, Rod Rosenstein – which could clear a path for Mueller to be fired – or if Trump pardoned key witnesses in the Russia investigation.
REMARKS: Well, now we know for sure who is behind all the problems, the group that funded all these other groups, THE GROUP. 300,000 will march on Washington if Mueller gets fired, WTF!
We've always known who is behind these problems - Trump and his administration. If it weren't for Trump and his appointment of criminals to his administration and campaign positions, there would be no need for an investigation. The blame goes to no one else.
300,000 thousand will march if Muller gets fired? And 100,000 is Rosenstein gets fired.
More than 300,000 people have pledged to attend “rapid response” protests across the US, should Donald Trump fire special counsel Robert Mueller.
The activist website MoveOn said it had more than 800 “emergency” rallies around the country prepared if Trump dismisses Mueller, who is investigating whether there was collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.
Activists would spring into action within hours, MoveOn said, marching in cities and towns in each of the 50 states. The mass protest would also be triggered if Trump moved to replace the deputy attorney general, Rod Rosenstein – which could clear a path for Mueller to be fired – or if Trump pardoned key witnesses in the Russia investigation.
REMARKS: Well, now we know for sure who is behind all the problems, the group that funded all these other groups, THE GROUP. 300,000 will march on Washington if Mueller gets fired, WTF!
We've always known who is behind these problems - Trump and his administration. If it weren't for Trump and his appointment of criminals to his administration and campaign positions, there would be no need for an investigation. The blame goes to no one else.
"if", "if", "if"...
Purely speculation and bowing to the far-left talking points.
2 for 2!
Has President Trump fired Mueller? - no
Has President Trump threatened to fire Mueller? - no
Has Mueller presented any document, evidence or witness that ties Candidate/President Trump to any criminal activity involving the Russians? - no
The upside is that there is mounting documented evidence of criminal activity by Obama officials with the Russians.
3) Ignore my post and keep posting
CHA-CHING!!
Double down on #3! Croupier, move all my chips to #3 please, thank you my good man.
Has President Trump fired Mueller? - no
Has President Trump threatened to fire Mueller? - noHas Mueller presented any document, evidence or witness that ties Candidate/President Trump to any criminal activity involving the Russians? - no
The upside is that there is mounting documented evidence of criminal activity by Obama officials with the Russians.
Well, you were correct with the first answer. After that, not so much.
Has President Trump fired Mueller? - no
Has President Trump threatened to fire Mueller? - noHas Mueller presented any document, evidence or witness that ties Candidate/President Trump to any criminal activity involving the Russians? - no
The upside is that there is mounting documented evidence of criminal activity by Obama officials with the Russians.
Well, you were correct with the first answer. After that, not so much.
X2
A Google search reveals many hits even though most of us already knew Trump's desire to fire Mueller.
"Trump Ordered Mueller Fired, but Backed Off When White House Counsel Threatened to Quit"
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/25/us/politics/trump-mueller-special-counsel-russia.html
Has President Trump fired Mueller? - no
Has President Trump threatened to fire Mueller? - noHas Mueller presented any document, evidence or witness that ties Candidate/President Trump to any criminal activity involving the Russians? - no
The upside is that there is mounting documented evidence of criminal activity by Obama officials with the Russians.
Well, you were correct with the first answer. After that, not so much.
X2
A Google search reveals many hits even though most of us already knew Trump's desire to fire Mueller.
"Trump Ordered Mueller Fired, but Backed Off When White House Counsel Threatened to Quit"
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/25/us/politics/trump-mueller-special-counsel-russia.html/blockquote >
"most of us already knew Trump's desire to fire Mueller"
If you get your opinion from NYT of course you would think that is factual.The NYT is one of the leading corrupt liberal media outlets.
They, just like Mueller, has been taunting president Trump to fire Mueller.President Trump knows better.
Why should he fire Mueller when Mueller has nothing.
(If he did it would have long ago leaked)
3 for 3 on #3! Burnin!
Mueller has confirmed Presdient Trump is not under criminal investigation.
When the left has nothing man they get so upset.
Bingo! Four for four!
Has President Trump fired Mueller? - no
Has President Trump threatened to fire Mueller? - noHas Mueller presented any document, evidence or witness that ties Candidate/President Trump to any criminal activity involving the Russians? - no
The upside is that there is mounting documented evidence of criminal activity by Obama officials with the Russians.
Well, you were correct with the first answer. After that, not so much.
X2
A Google search reveals many hits even though most of us already knew Trump's desire to fire Mueller.
"Trump Ordered Mueller Fired, but Backed Off When White House Counsel Threatened to Quit"
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/25/us/politics/trump-mueller-special-counsel-russia.html/blockquote >
"most of us already knew Trump's desire to fire Mueller"
If you get your opinion from NYT of course you would think that is factual.The NYT is one of the leading corrupt liberal media outlets.
They, just like Mueller, has been taunting president Trump to fire Mueller.President Trump knows better.
Why should he fire Mueller when Mueller has nothing.
(If he did it would have long ago leaked)Even Trump's #1 fluffer Hannity confirmed (reluctantly) that Trump tried to fire Mueller last June, right before trying to distract his viewers with a car chase:
