There is not one liberal commentator who has a show on Fox since Colmes left Hannity & Colmes.
Wrong again. What about Geraldo Rivera Reports, which was on tonight. I guess now you'll try to tell us that Geraldo is a conservative.
He is a registered Republican who is considering running for the Senate as a Republican. He certainly is not Tea Party conservative but he claims to be moderate Republican.
Correct. I wasn't aware of his conversion. I always knew he was a very smart man. 
There is not one liberal commentator who has a show on Fox since Colmes left Hannity & Colmes.
Wrong again. What about Geraldo Rivera Reports, which was on tonight. I guess now you'll try to tell us that Geraldo is a conservative.
He is a registered Republican who is considering running for the Senate as a Republican. He certainly is not Tea Party conservative but he claims to be moderate Republican.
Correct. I wasn't aware of his conversion. I always knew he was a very smart man.
Actually he was a registered Independent before he came to the dark side so not exactly an epic flip on his part.
You might not be so happy with him if you read his stance on the issues as he is very centrist on most of them.
[Edited on 3/22/2015 by Bill_Graham]
There is not one liberal commentator who has a show on Fox since Colmes left Hannity & Colmes.
Wrong again. What about Geraldo Rivera Reports, which was on tonight. I guess now you'll try to tell us that Geraldo is a conservative.
He is a registered Republican who is considering running for the Senate as a Republican. He certainly is not Tea Party conservative but he claims to be moderate Republican.
Correct. I wasn't aware of his conversion. I always knew he was a very smart man.
Actually he was a registered Independent before he came to the dark side so not exactly an epic flip on his part.
You might not be so happy with him if you read his stance on the issues as he is very centrist on most of them.
[Edited on 3/22/2015 by Bill_Graham]
I wasn't really being serious. Geraldo can call himself anything he wants.
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 million viewers out of 319 million people........ whether you want to believe it or not, all 3 (Fox, CNN, MSNBC) are viewed by < 1% of the US population.....
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Barack is out complaining about FOX again. He seems to have an obsession. Why? With such inconsequential viewership, what difference does it make?
Oh yes...it's in the obsession category alright.......exaggerate much? To your point, if he is mentioning Fox News during his media appearances, it's foolish. He should ignore it like a gnat. It doesn't change the fact that they are part of the poison-spewing garbage cable news biz.
Of course he should ignore it as he should ignore all attacks. But he lacks the grace and class to do so. He is incredibly thin skinned and considers all criticism illegitimate. Imagine if Bush or Clinton spent so much time attacking those who attacked them? Or Roosevelt or Lincoln or Washington?
Not often mentioned is the fact that FOX has no shortage of Obama supporters on the air. There are plenty of panelists from the Left side that constantly take up for him.
Please name a few of them. They must be on air at 3 AM.
They are on every show throughout the day. Whenever there is a conservative panelist there is a liberla or Democratic one as well.
I've got to say I don't watch Fox News much, maybe an hour or two a month, but just about anytime I do I see liberals on. Aren't there some regular liberals on some of the shows?
Obviously anyone who says they have never seen liberals on Fox has not watched it very much and is just repeating their Democratic talking points like good little Democrats.
Alloak, you listed people who make guest appearances but do not haave shows. Most of their appearances are on panels where they are outnumbered by conservatives. Colmes was a regular but no longer. That was weak.
The people I listed are frequent panelists, not guests, appearing daily in some cases but all are seen regularly in varying degrees. A "guest" would run more along the lines of a Barney Frank, Dennis Axelrod, Lanny Davis, or Bernie Sanders. Are those Liberal enough for you?
Beckel is a regular on a daily show called "The Five" which is a topical discussion show made up of conservatives and liberals. The Five is a highly entertaining show which is why people watch it and watch Fox. MSNBC (which was the original topic) is filled with boring angry left wing drones which even fellow lefties find unpleasant. That's why its ratings have tanked.
[Edited on 3/22/2015 by alloak41]
Oh yes...it's in the obsession category alright.......exaggerate much? To your point, if he is mentioning Fox News during his media appearances, it's foolish. He should ignore it like a gnat. It doesn't change the fact that they are part of the poison-spewing garbage cable news biz.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Of course he should ignore it as he should ignore all attacks. But he lacks the grace and class to do so. He is incredibly thin skinned and considers all criticism illegitimate. Imagine if Bush or Clinton spent so much time attacking those who attacked them? Or Roosevelt or Lincoln or Washington?
You see a lack of class, grace, and a thin-skinned person? Man, you are one warped, angry, negative dude. It's in your own best interest to figure out what Obama represents to you. You can tell a lot buy the style of someone's writing, and your word choices clearly reveal a lot of hostility. Why? It can't be Obama. No politician can create that in someone if it wasn't there already.
Fox News, like the all the rest, is theater. It's a slightly more sophisticated version of Springer.
Oh yes...it's in the obsession category alright.......exaggerate much? To your point, if he is mentioning Fox News during his media appearances, it's foolish. He should ignore it like a gnat. It doesn't change the fact that they are part of the poison-spewing garbage cable news biz.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Of course he should ignore it as he should ignore all attacks. But he lacks the grace and class to do so. He is incredibly thin skinned and considers all criticism illegitimate. Imagine if Bush or Clinton spent so much time attacking those who attacked them? Or Roosevelt or Lincoln or Washington?
You see a lack of class, grace, and a thin-skinned person? Man, you are one warped, angry, negative dude. It's in your own best interest to figure out what Obama represents to you. You can tell a lot buy the style of someone's writing, and your word choices clearly reveal a lot of hostility. Why? It can't be Obama. No politician can create that in someone if it wasn't there already.
It is amazing how much hatred he has for Obama. And yet, his hero Netanyahu, as he was in danger of losing and election, flip flopped on his support of a Palestinian state, and then flip flopped back to his oruginal stance upon being reelected. Hypocrite.
Oh yes...it's in the obsession category alright.......exaggerate much? To your point, if he is mentioning Fox News during his media appearances, it's foolish. He should ignore it like a gnat. It doesn't change the fact that they are part of the poison-spewing garbage cable news biz.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Of course he should ignore it as he should ignore all attacks. But he lacks the grace and class to do so. He is incredibly thin skinned and considers all criticism illegitimate. Imagine if Bush or Clinton spent so much time attacking those who attacked them? Or Roosevelt or Lincoln or Washington?
You see a lack of class, grace, and a thin-skinned person? Man, you are one warped, angry, negative dude.
I guess I am too, then. Obama never advanced past adolescence. Sorry for noticing this.
Oh yes...it's in the obsession category alright.......exaggerate much? To your point, if he is mentioning Fox News during his media appearances, it's foolish. He should ignore it like a gnat. It doesn't change the fact that they are part of the poison-spewing garbage cable news biz.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Of course he should ignore it as he should ignore all attacks. But he lacks the grace and class to do so. He is incredibly thin skinned and considers all criticism illegitimate. Imagine if Bush or Clinton spent so much time attacking those who attacked them? Or Roosevelt or Lincoln or Washington?
You see a lack of class, grace, and a thin-skinned person? Man, you are one warped, angry, negative dude.
I guess I am too, then. Obama never advanced past adolescence. Sorry for noticing this.
Ended the recession.
Got us out of 2 wars we never should have been in
Successfully overhauled health care.
Constantly had to battle Congress for everything.
Yeah, typical adolescent. I suppose that you, as an alleged adult, could do better.
The idea that a person could become President of the United States while acting like an adolescent is completely stupid. As stupid as some of the many other idiotic posts you have made.
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 million viewers out of 319 million people........ whether you want to believe it or not, all 3 (Fox, CNN, MSNBC) are viewed by < 1% of the US population.....
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Barack is out complaining about FOX again. He seems to have an obsession. Why? With such inconsequential viewership, what difference does it make?
Oh yes...it's in the obsession category alright.......exaggerate much? To your point, if he is mentioning Fox News during his media appearances, it's foolish. He should ignore it like a gnat. It doesn't change the fact that they are part of the poison-spewing garbage cable news biz.
Of course he should ignore it as he should ignore all attacks. But he lacks the grace and class to do so. He is incredibly thin skinned and considers all criticism illegitimate. Imagine if Bush or Clinton spent so much time attacking those who attacked them? Or Roosevelt or Lincoln or Washington?
They all did it. Just because you forgot or choose to ignore doesn't change that.
I've got to say I don't watch Fox News much, maybe an hour or two a month, but just about anytime I do I see liberals on. Aren't there some regular liberals on some of the shows?
Obviously anyone who says they have never seen liberals on Fox has not watched it very much and is just repeating their Democratic talking points like good little Democrats.
Truly mind-boggling. I flipped over to FOX getting ready for work. Just curious. Alan Colmes on the screen. Flipped back to ESPN.
Got us out of 2 wars we never should have been in
We'll never completely get out of Iraq...sooner or later we'll get more involved again militarily. Saddam was a giant scab on humanity, but now that we picked the scab it won't stop bleeding unless someone is there to hold the bandage.
This thread does strike me a little funny. MSNBC has never been on the same level as Fox News. Silly to compare the two. Always been shocked anyone watches MSNBC at all.
You see a lack of class, grace, and a thin-skinned person? Man, you are one warped, angry, negative dude.
___________________________________________________
I guess I am too, then. Obama never advanced past adolescence. Sorry for noticing this.
Ridiculous. No, he's not the only one, and yes, liberals were just as bad with Bush, but Obama has faced brutal attacks on his nationality, religion, ethics, morals, race, politicians heckling him during SOTU calling him a "liar!", blaming him for the deaths in Benghazi, a socialist, trying to Islamatize the US, sympathetic to terrorists, yada yada yada, and you call him thin-skinned. Please put your feelings aside and use some common sense here.
You see a lack of class, grace, and a thin-skinned person? Man, you are one warped, angry, negative dude.
___________________________________________________
I guess I am too, then. Obama never advanced past adolescence. Sorry for noticing this.
Ridiculous. No, he's not the only one, and yes, liberals were just as bad with Bush, but Obama has faced brutal attacks on his nationality, religion, ethics, morals, race, politicians heckling him during SOTU calling him a "liar!", blaming him for the deaths in Benghazi, a socialist, trying to Islamatize the US, sympathetic to terrorists, yada yada yada, and you call him thin-skinned. Please put your feelings aside and use some common sense here.
Common sense? OK. My common sense tells me that as President you've got to let these things go. Part of the job.
My common sense tells me not to blame everything wrong on others, constantly complain, make excuses, ridicule people that don't agree with you, stir up anger among groups for political reasons, constantly posture yourself as an innocent bystander who is responsible for nothing.
Show some guts, leadership, statesmanship. That's what my common sense tells me.
You see a lack of class, grace, and a thin-skinned person? Man, you are one warped, angry, negative dude.
___________________________________________________
I guess I am too, then. Obama never advanced past adolescence. Sorry for noticing this.
Ridiculous. No, he's not the only one, and yes, liberals were just as bad with Bush, but Obama has faced brutal attacks on his nationality, religion, ethics, morals, race, politicians heckling him during SOTU calling him a "liar!", blaming him for the deaths in Benghazi, a socialist, trying to Islamatize the US, sympathetic to terrorists, yada yada yada, and you call him thin-skinned. Please put your feelings aside and use some common sense here.
Common sense? OK. My common sense tells me that as President you've got to let these things go. Part of the job.
My common sense tells me not to blame everything wrong on others, constantly complain, make excuses, ridicule people that don't agree with you, stir up anger among groups for political reasons, constantly posture yourself as an innocent bystander who is responsible for nothing.
Show some guts, leadership, statesmanship. That's what my common sense tells me.
Don't be naive. If you take your blinders off for a moment you'd see that your idea of "common sense" is exactly what this president does on a daily basis, just like those before him. Just because you don't agree with a president's policy positions doesn't mean he doesn't have/do those things. Disagreement is not a bad thing, but no one gets elected POTUS twice, not Reagan, not Clinton, not GW Bush and not Obama, with those qualities.
[Edited on 3/24/2015 by gondicar]
Common sense? OK. My common sense tells me that as President you've got to let these things go. Part of the job.
He does, for the most part. Aside from a few foolish retorts, I'd say he's handled it pretty well.
My common sense tells me not to blame everything wrong on others, constantly complain, make excuses, ridicule people that don't agree with you,
Agreed! So you then you are equally as disappointed with the Republicans then.
stir up anger among groups for political reasons, constantly posture yourself as an innocent bystander who is responsible for nothing.
Agreed! So you then you are equally as disappointed with the Republicans then.
Show some guts, leadership, statesmanship. That's what my common sense tells me.
Agreed! So you then you are equally as disappointed with the Republicans then.
I can't thank you enough for posting that. I will refer to it many many times in the future.
[Edited on 3/24/2015 by BoytonBrother]
You see a lack of class, grace, and a thin-skinned person? Man, you are one warped, angry, negative dude.
___________________________________________________
I guess I am too, then. Obama never advanced past adolescence. Sorry for noticing this.
Ridiculous. No, he's not the only one, and yes, liberals were just as bad with Bush, but Obama has faced brutal attacks on his nationality, religion, ethics, morals, race, politicians heckling him during SOTU calling him a "liar!", blaming him for the deaths in Benghazi, a socialist, trying to Islamatize the US, sympathetic to terrorists, yada yada yada, and you call him thin-skinned. Please put your feelings aside and use some common sense here.
Common sense? OK. My common sense tells me that as President you've got to let these things go. Part of the job.
My common sense tells me not to blame everything wrong on others, constantly complain, make excuses, ridicule people that don't agree with you, stir up anger among groups for political reasons, constantly posture yourself as an innocent bystander who is responsible for nothing.
Show some guts, leadership, statesmanship. That's what my common sense tells me.
Don't be naive. If you take your blinders off for a moment you'd see that your idea of "common sense" is exactly what this president does on a daily basis, just like those before him. Just because you don't agree with a president's policy positions doesn't mean he doesn't have/do those things. Disagreement is not a bad thing, but no one gets elected POTUS twice, not Reagan, not Clinton, not GW Bush and not Obama, with those qualities.
[Edited on 3/24/2015 by gondicar]
This one did.
I guess I am too, then. Obama never advanced past adolescence. Sorry for noticing this.
Ended the recession.
Got us out of 2 wars we never should have been in
Successfully overhauled health care.
Constantly had to battle Congress for everything.Yeah, typical adolescent. I suppose that you, as an alleged adult, could do better.
The idea that a person could become President of the United States while acting like an adolescent is completely stupid. As stupid as some of the many other idiotic posts you have made.
No matter what conservatives say they cannot change the fact that Obama has succeeded as President of the United States. The country is far better off now than when he took office.
We have a long way to go. Our infrastructure needs are overwhelming. We need to shore up our power grid and our roads. California must build more desalination plants, Congress has got to allocate more money for our Veterans. The list goes on. But it is a list that grew under previous Presidents as well as Obama.
Our Congress is rife with entitled, do nothing, bribed, petulant asses that need to be fired. They are not doing the work of the People.
No matter what conservatives say they cannot change the fact that Obama has succeeded as President of the United States. The country is far better off now than when he took office.
It would be hard for it to be much worse. There was only one way to go.
Oh yes...it's in the obsession category alright.......exaggerate much? To your point, if he is mentioning Fox News during his media appearances, it's foolish. He should ignore it like a gnat. It doesn't change the fact that they are part of the poison-spewing garbage cable news biz.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Of course he should ignore it as he should ignore all attacks. But he lacks the grace and class to do so. He is incredibly thin skinned and considers all criticism illegitimate. Imagine if Bush or Clinton spent so much time attacking those who attacked them? Or Roosevelt or Lincoln or Washington?
You see a lack of class, grace, and a thin-skinned person? Man, you are one warped, angry, negative dude. It's in your own best interest to figure out what Obama represents to you. You can tell a lot buy the style of someone's writing, and your word choices clearly reveal a lot of hostility. Why? It can't be Obama. No politician can create that in someone if it wasn't there already.
Clasic from you. I attack Obama and you proceed with a nasty over the top attack on me personally. Enough said and no more need to discuss it with you anymore.
Oh yes...it's in the obsession category alright.......exaggerate much? To your point, if he is mentioning Fox News during his media appearances, it's foolish. He should ignore it like a gnat. It doesn't change the fact that they are part of the poison-spewing garbage cable news biz.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Of course he should ignore it as he should ignore all attacks. But he lacks the grace and class to do so. He is incredibly thin skinned and considers all criticism illegitimate. Imagine if Bush or Clinton spent so much time attacking those who attacked them? Or Roosevelt or Lincoln or Washington?
You see a lack of class, grace, and a thin-skinned person? Man, you are one warped, angry, negative dude. It's in your own best interest to figure out what Obama represents to you. You can tell a lot buy the style of someone's writing, and your word choices clearly reveal a lot of hostility. Why? It can't be Obama. No politician can create that in someone if it wasn't there already.
It is amazing how much hatred he has for Obama. And yet, his hero Netanyahu, as he was in danger of losing and election, flip flopped on his support of a Palestinian state, and then flip flopped back to his oruginal stance upon being reelected. Hypocrite.
He's not my hero jackass.
You see a lack of class, grace, and a thin-skinned person? Man, you are one warped, angry, negative dude.
___________________________________________________
I guess I am too, then. Obama never advanced past adolescence. Sorry for noticing this.
Ridiculous. No, he's not the only one, and yes, liberals were just as bad with Bush, but Obama has faced brutal attacks on his nationality, religion, ethics, morals, race, politicians heckling him during SOTU calling him a "liar!", blaming him for the deaths in Benghazi, a socialist, trying to Islamatize the US, sympathetic to terrorists, yada yada yada, and you call him thin-skinned. Please put your feelings aside and use some common sense here.
Common sense? OK. My common sense tells me that as President you've got to let these things go. Part of the job.
My common sense tells me not to blame everything wrong on others, constantly complain, make excuses, ridicule people that don't agree with you, stir up anger among groups for political reasons, constantly posture yourself as an innocent bystander who is responsible for nothing.
Show some guts, leadership, statesmanship. That's what my common sense tells me.
Man you are one warped individual for pointing these things out.
Common sense? OK. My common sense tells me that as President you've got to let these things go. Part of the job.
He does, for the most part. Aside from a few foolish retorts, I'd say he's handled it pretty well.
My common sense tells me not to blame everything wrong on others, constantly complain, make excuses, ridicule people that don't agree with you,
Agreed! So you then you are equally as disappointed with the Republicans then.
stir up anger among groups for political reasons, constantly posture yourself as an innocent bystander who is responsible for nothing.
Agreed! So you then you are equally as disappointed with the Republicans then.
Show some guts, leadership, statesmanship. That's what my common sense tells me.
Agreed! So you then you are equally as disappointed with the Republicans then.
I can't thank you enough for posting that. I will refer to it many many times in the future.
[Edited on 3/24/2015 by BoytonBrother]
yeah but he's the president. Big difference.
You see a lack of class, grace, and a thin-skinned person? Man, you are one warped, angry, negative dude. It's in your own best interest to figure out what Obama represents to you. You can tell a lot buy the style of someone's writing, and your word choices clearly reveal a lot of hostility. Why? It can't be Obama. No politician can create that in someone if it wasn't there already.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------Clasic from you. I attack Obama and you proceed with a nasty over the top attack on me personally. Enough said and no more need to discuss it with you anymore.
We both call it like we see it I guess.
yeah but he's the president. Big difference.
So a lower rank gives people the right to behave like buffoons?
yeah but he's the president. Big difference.
So a lower rank gives people the right to behave like buffoons?
I don't attribute it to lower rank. I'd say it's just more who they are as indivduals. And that is pretty f'ing sad when they're supposed to be doing the peoples' business. I think when they get to DC, they seem to forget that.
