Imagine this scenario: Hillary Clinton is president. It's learned that she has deep ties to Putin. She puts utterly unqualifed billionaires in cabinet posts. She puts her daughter Chelsea in a position of influence in the West Wing. And Chelsea's husband is her chief advisor. She refuses to release any tax returns, she blocks access to the visitor logs in the White House and Bill refuses to live in the White House so our tax dollars are spent keeping him safe in Chappaqua. And Hillary spends almost every weekend lounging in a resort. AND, in an interview she names the wrong country she bombed while bragging about the chocolate cake she was eating while she did said bombing. I could go on and on. The point is that the outrage, the outcries, the screaming by Republicans would be heard around the world and impeachment proceedings would already be underway.
Muleman would be going nuts.
Imagine this scenario: Hillary Clinton is president. It's learned that she has deep ties to Putin. She puts utterly unqualifed billionaires in cabinet posts. She puts her daughter Chelsea in a position of influence in the West Wing. And Chelsea's husband is her chief advisor. She refuses to release any tax returns, she blocks access to the visitor logs in the White House and Bill refuses to live in the White House so our tax dollars are spent keeping him safe in Chappaqua. And Hillary spends almost every weekend lounging in a resort. AND, in an interview she names the wrong country she bombed while bragging about the chocolate cake she was eating while she did said bombing. I could go on and on. The point is that the outrage, the outcries, the screaming by Republicans would be heard around the world and impeachment proceedings would already be underway.
Muleman would be going nuts.
You are right, everyone throws a fit when they don't get what they want . Its such an injustice no matter what side of the fence you are on. 😉
Everyone has a plan, till you get punched in the face,
Imagine this scenario: Hillary Clinton is president.
I cant get past this point. Sorry. I cant participate in your role playing.
Imagine this scenario: Hillary Clinton is president.
I cant get past this point. Sorry. I cant participate in your role playing.
That's OK, Goob. It will be here for a while. Come back every hour or two and read another sentence. Soon it will dawn on you that you are backing a felon.
Imagine this scenario: Hillary Clinton is president. It's learned that she has deep ties to Putin. She puts utterly unqualifed billionaires in cabinet posts. She puts her daughter Chelsea in a position of influence in the West Wing. And Chelsea's husband is her chief advisor. She refuses to release any tax returns, she blocks access to the visitor logs in the White House and Bill refuses to live in the White House so our tax dollars are spent keeping him safe in Chappaqua. And Hillary spends almost every weekend lounging in a resort. AND, in an interview she names the wrong country she bombed while bragging about the chocolate cake she was eating while she did said bombing. I could go on and on. The point is that the outrage, the outcries, the screaming by Republicans would be heard around the world and impeachment proceedings would already be underway.
Muleman would be going nuts.
______________________________________________________________________________
When you wakeup from your dream you are going to be shocked.
Imagine this scenario: Hillary Clinton is president.
I cant get past this point. Sorry. I cant participate in your role playing.
goob,
Please comment on the the many successes of legislation passed under Trump's leadership. Name one.
If it weren't for exec orders and nuclear option, he'd be batting 0.
What do you thing the chances are that Mexico will pay for the wall? Better yet - what do you think the chances are that his big beautiful wall will even be built?
Imagine this scenario: Hillary Clinton is president.
I cant get past this point. Sorry. I cant participate in your role playing.
goob,
Please comment on the the many successes of legislation passed under Trump's leadership. Name one.
If it weren't for exec orders and nuclear option, he'd be batting 0.
What do you thing the chances are that Mexico will pay for the wall? Better yet - what do you think the chances are that his big beautiful wall will even be built?
He is getting tougher on immigration and terrorism; and that is really more important than the physical war. Whether you agree with how he's doing it is another issue. On social/domestic topics I can't say anything positive
Imagine this scenario: Hillary Clinton is president.
I cant get past this point. Sorry. I cant participate in your role playing.
goob,
Please comment on the the many successes of legislation passed under Trump's leadership. Name one.
If it weren't for exec orders and nuclear option, he'd be batting 0.
What do you thing the chances are that Mexico will pay for the wall? Better yet - what do you think the chances are that his big beautiful wall will even be built?
He is getting tougher on immigration and terrorism; and that is really more important than the physical war. Whether you agree with how he's doing it is another issue. On social/domestic topics I can't say anything positive
He has had 2 executive orders on immigration stopped by the courts. So he has actually accomplished nothing on that.
And please explain how he has getting tougher on terrorism. So far, nothing has really changed.
Imagine this scenario: Hillary Clinton is president.
I cant get past this point. Sorry. I cant participate in your role playing.
goob,
Please comment on the the many successes of legislation passed under Trump's leadership. Name one.
If it weren't for exec orders and nuclear option, he'd be batting 0.
What do you thing the chances are that Mexico will pay for the wall? Better yet - what do you think the chances are that his big beautiful wall will even be built?
He is getting tougher on immigration and terrorism; and that is really more important than the physical war. Whether you agree with how he's doing it is another issue. On social/domestic topics I can't say anything positive
He has had 2 executive orders on immigration stopped by the courts. So he has actually accomplished nothing on that.
And please explain how he has getting tougher on terrorism. So far, nothing has really changed.
______________________________________________________________________________
Border crossings are down 71% since President Trump took office and the Federal Gov't is no longer running TV and radio ads in Mexico promoting free housing, food stamps, education and healthcare.
No more chemical attacks on the people of Syria.
Just a couple of facts not mentioned by the corrupt liberal media or the left-wing extremist websites.
Sanctuary city leaders have received a letter from Uncle Donnie about some upcoming changes to their budgets and policies and procedures for handling the undocumented's.
Imagine this scenario: Hillary Clinton is president.
I cant get past this point. Sorry. I cant participate in your role playing.
goob,
Please comment on the the many successes of legislation passed under Trump's leadership. Name one.
If it weren't for exec orders and nuclear option, he'd be batting 0.
What do you thing the chances are that Mexico will pay for the wall? Better yet - what do you think the chances are that his big beautiful wall will even be built?
He is getting tougher on immigration and terrorism; and that is really more important than the physical war. Whether you agree with how he's doing it is another issue. On social/domestic topics I can't say anything positive
He has had 2 executive orders on immigration stopped by the courts. So he has actually accomplished nothing on that.
And please explain how he has getting tougher on terrorism. So far, nothing has really changed.
______________________________________________________________________________
Border crossings are down 71% since President Trump took office and the Federal Gov't is no longer running TV and radio ads in Mexico promoting free housing, food stamps, education and healthcare.
No more chemical attacks on the people of Syria.
Just a couple of facts not mentioned by the corrupt liberal media or the left-wing extremist websites.
You need to lay off the drugs. The US government never ran ads promoting free stuff for illegals. Let's see you come up with a copy of that ad (not some right wing conspiracy website talking about one, the real thing). The US did, however, run TV ads discouraging illegal immigration :
And Syria not using chemical weapons for two weeks is supposed to be some kind of triumph for Donald Trump?
Strange world you live in Mule.
Sanctuary city leaders have received a letter from Uncle Donnie about some upcoming changes to their budgets and policies and procedures for handling the undocumented's.
Blocked by the courts. Yet another Trump failure. 😛
Judge William H Orrick who blocked Trump Sanctuary City order raised over 200,000 and donated 30,000 to BHO to get his job.
Look it up
Sanctuary city leaders have received a letter from Uncle Donnie about some upcoming changes to their budgets and policies and procedures for handling the undocumented's.
Blocked by the courts. Yet another Trump failure. 😛
______________________________________________________________________________
keller the liar tries to misrepresent the facts again.
The judge put a temp. stay on the exec. order until the case is hear by a court and there is a ruling.
And the judges ruling applies to only one city.
Judge William H Orrick who blocked Trump Sanctuary City order raised over 200,000 and donated 30,000 to BHO to get his job.
Look it up
________________________________________________________________________________
Judge shopping only helps the City of SF temporarily.
Hopefully not too many innocent Americans will be killed there like Kate Steinly.
Sanctuary city leaders have received a letter from Uncle Donnie about some upcoming changes to their budgets and policies and procedures for handling the undocumented's.
Blocked by the courts. Yet another Trump failure. 😛
______________________________________________________________________________
keller the liar tries to misrepresent the facts again.
The judge put a temp. stay on the exec. order until the case is hear by a court and there is a ruling.
And the judges ruling applies to only one city.
From your favorite news site.
A California judge on Tuesday blocked President Trump’s executive order that sought to withhold federal funds from so-called “sanctuary cities.”
The ruling from U.S. District Judge William Orrick III in San Francisco said that Trump's order targeted broad categories of federal funding for sanctuary governments, and that plaintiffs challenging the order were likely to succeed in proving it unconstitutional.
The decision will block the measure for now, while the federal lawsuit works its way through the courts.
From the actual ruling.
The Counties challenge the enforcement provision of the Order, Section 9(a), on several grounds: first, it violates the separation of powers doctrine enshrined in the Constitution because it improperly seeks to wield congressional spending powers; second, it is so overbroad and coercive that even if the President had spending powers, the Order would clearly exceed them and violate the Tenth Amendment’s prohibition against commandeering local jurisdictions; third, it is so vague and standardless that it violates the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause and is void for vagueness; and, finally, because it seeks to deprive local jurisdictions of congressionally allocated funds without any notice or opportunity to be heard, it violates the procedural due process requirements of the Fifth Amendment.1
Although the Government’s new interpretation of the Order is not legally plausible, in effect it appears to put the parties in general agreement regarding the Order’s constitutional
limitations. The Constitution vests the spending powers in Congress, not the President, so the Order cannot constitutionally place new conditions on federal funds. Further, the Tenth Amendment requires that conditions on federal funds be unambiguous and timely made; that they bear some relation to the funds at issue; and that the total financial incentive not be coercive. Federal funding that bears no meaningful relationship to immigration enforcement cannot be threatened merely because a jurisdiction chooses an immigration enforcement strategy of which the President disapproves.
What the ruling says is that the court feels that the president does not have the right to withhold funds that were approved by Congress. In other wrds, once again, Trump does not understand the system of checks and balances that keep him from running amok.
Sanctuary city leaders have received a letter from Uncle Donnie about some upcoming changes to their budgets and policies and procedures for handling the undocumented's.
Blocked by the courts. Yet another Trump failure. 😛
______________________________________________________________________________
keller the liar tries to misrepresent the facts again.
The judge put a temp. stay on the exec. order until the case is hear by a court and there is a ruling.
And the judges ruling applies to only one city.
From your favorite news site.
A California judge on Tuesday blocked President Trump’s executive order that sought to withhold federal funds from so-called “sanctuary cities.”
The ruling from U.S. District Judge William Orrick III in San Francisco said that Trump's order targeted broad categories of federal funding for sanctuary governments, and that plaintiffs challenging the order were likely to succeed in proving it unconstitutional.
The decision will block the measure for now, while the federal lawsuit works its way through the courts.
From the actual ruling.
The Counties challenge the enforcement provision of the Order, Section 9(a), on several grounds: first, it violates the separation of powers doctrine enshrined in the Constitution because it improperly seeks to wield congressional spending powers; second, it is so overbroad and coercive that even if the President had spending powers, the Order would clearly exceed them and violate the Tenth Amendment’s prohibition against commandeering local jurisdictions; third, it is so vague and standardless that it violates the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause and is void for vagueness; and, finally, because it seeks to deprive local jurisdictions of congressionally allocated funds without any notice or opportunity to be heard, it violates the procedural due process requirements of the Fifth Amendment.1
Although the Government’s new interpretation of the Order is not legally plausible, in effect it appears to put the parties in general agreement regarding the Order’s constitutional
limitations. The Constitution vests the spending powers in Congress, not the President, so the Order cannot constitutionally place new conditions on federal funds. Further, the Tenth Amendment requires that conditions on federal funds be unambiguous and timely made; that they bear some relation to the funds at issue; and that the total financial incentive not be coercive. Federal funding that bears no meaningful relationship to immigration enforcement cannot be threatened merely because a jurisdiction chooses an immigration enforcement strategy of which the President disapproves.What the ruling says is that the court feels that the president does not have the right to withhold funds that were approved by Congress. In other wrds, once again, Trump does not understand the system of checks and balances that keep him from running amok.
_______________________________________________________________________________
"What the ruling says is that the court feels that the president does not have the right to withhold funds that were approved by Congress. In other wrds, once again, Trump does not understand the system of checks and balances that keep him from running amok." is your opinion and you are too stupid to understand the ruling.
You seem to have edited out the temporary stay part and that this ruling only applies to S.F.
Try again liar.
Sanctuary city leaders have received a letter from Uncle Donnie about some upcoming changes to their budgets and policies and procedures for handling the undocumented's.
The undocumented's what? Oops, guess that apostrophe was misplaced. Doh!
No more chemical attacks on the people of Syria.
Holy stupid Batman! Did you just praise Trump for "no more chemical attacks on the people of Syria", only a couple weeks after it just happened under his watch? That's like praising Obama for saying "no more kindergarten school shootings" just 2 weeks after Newtown, CT. Wow, how stupid.
Sanctuary city leaders have received a letter from Uncle Donnie about some upcoming changes to their budgets and policies and procedures for handling the undocumented's.
Blocked by the courts. Yet another Trump failure. 😛
______________________________________________________________________________
keller the liar tries to misrepresent the facts again.
The judge put a temp. stay on the exec. order until the case is hear by a court and there is a ruling.
And the judges ruling applies to only one city.
From your favorite news site.
A California judge on Tuesday blocked President Trump’s executive order that sought to withhold federal funds from so-called “sanctuary cities.”
The ruling from U.S. District Judge William Orrick III in San Francisco said that Trump's order targeted broad categories of federal funding for sanctuary governments, and that plaintiffs challenging the order were likely to succeed in proving it unconstitutional.
The decision will block the measure for now, while the federal lawsuit works its way through the courts.
From the actual ruling.
The Counties challenge the enforcement provision of the Order, Section 9(a), on several grounds: first, it violates the separation of powers doctrine enshrined in the Constitution because it improperly seeks to wield congressional spending powers; second, it is so overbroad and coercive that even if the President had spending powers, the Order would clearly exceed them and violate the Tenth Amendment’s prohibition against commandeering local jurisdictions; third, it is so vague and standardless that it violates the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause and is void for vagueness; and, finally, because it seeks to deprive local jurisdictions of congressionally allocated funds without any notice or opportunity to be heard, it violates the procedural due process requirements of the Fifth Amendment.1
Although the Government’s new interpretation of the Order is not legally plausible, in effect it appears to put the parties in general agreement regarding the Order’s constitutional
limitations. The Constitution vests the spending powers in Congress, not the President, so the Order cannot constitutionally place new conditions on federal funds. Further, the Tenth Amendment requires that conditions on federal funds be unambiguous and timely made; that they bear some relation to the funds at issue; and that the total financial incentive not be coercive. Federal funding that bears no meaningful relationship to immigration enforcement cannot be threatened merely because a jurisdiction chooses an immigration enforcement strategy of which the President disapproves.What the ruling says is that the court feels that the president does not have the right to withhold funds that were approved by Congress. In other wrds, once again, Trump does not understand the system of checks and balances that keep him from running amok.
_______________________________________________________________________________
"What the ruling says is that the court feels that the president does not have the right to withhold funds that were approved by Congress. In other wrds, once again, Trump does not understand the system of checks and balances that keep him from running amok." is your opinion and you are too stupid to understand the ruling.
You seem to have edited out the temporary stay part and that this ruling only applies to S.F.
Try again liar.
What part of U. S. District Court didn't you understand?
You are pretty free with the words "liar" and "stupid " in your posts. Look in a mirror.
No more chemical attacks on the people of Syria.
Holy stupid Batman! Did you just praise Trump for "no more chemical attacks on the people of Syria", only a couple weeks after it just happened under his watch? That's like praising Obama for saying "no more kindergarten school shootings" just 2 weeks after Newtown, CT. Wow, how stupid.
_________________________________________________________________________________
Obama drew the line. Assad jumped right over it and told Obama to shut up. Obama did shut up.
President Trump hit Assad hard and since then Assad ha not used chemical weapons on his people.
Obama failed.
President Trump has major success applauded around the world.
