BIGV, so then do all of us here (including you) lack credibility too and therefore we don't make any valid points?
I do not claim to have credibility behind any political opinion I write, they are just that, opinion. Take them or leave them, I really don't care. So, someone here posting someone Else's opinion and then scratching their heads when some see it as just that...is well, laughable.
"Joe the plumber" = Richard Brunt. If you find either of their leanings valid, well good for you.
BIGV, so then do all of us here (including you) lack credibility too and therefore we don't make any valid points?
I do not claim to have credibility behind any political opinion I write, they are just that, opinion. Take them or leave them, I really don't care. So, someone here posting someone Else's opinion and then scratching their heads when some see it as just that...is well, laughable.
"Joe the plumber" = Richard Brunt. If you find either of their leanings valid, well good for you.
If someone is posting an opinion to back their opinion then I agree credibility is important. But if someone posts an article based on facts then why should credibility be a criteria for accepting facts? A fact is a fact Yes?
"Facts are stupid things." - President Ronald Reagan, 1988
"Facts are stupid things." - President Ronald Reagan, 1988
"If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts". ~ Albert Einstein
Wow. I just saw Ronald Reagan compared to Einstein.
Holy $hit.
Wow. I just saw Ronald Reagan compared to Einstein.
Holy $hit.
When Reagans daughter posed for Playboy she could have used a trim 😛 😛 😛 😮 😮
[Edited on 11/19/2014 by allmanned]
