Fox News to young women: Don’t worry about voting, just focus on your Tinder profile
On Tuesday’s edition of “The Five,” Fox News host Kimberly Guilfoyle suggested that young women, who apparently lack important conservative wisdom, should just go ahead and excuse themselves from voting in the midterms. According to Guilfoyle and her co-hosts, females of a certain age just “don’t get it,” which should probably disqualify them from serving on juries, or from exercising a crucial constitutional right they gained less than a century ago.
“It’s the same reason why young women on juries are not a good idea,” Guilfoyle said. “They don’t get it. They’re not in that same life experience of paying the bills, doing the mortgage, kids, community, crime, education, healthcare. They’re like healthy and hot and running around without a care in the world.”
LOL, And the GOP wonders why women don't vote for them.
Because of a remark by one TV commentator? Good grief.
[Edited on 10/23/2014 by alloak41]
Fox News is the voice of the GOP. Just another example of the conservative thought process and why they lost the female vote.
Whatever. As far as you know.
Fox News to young women: Don’t worry about voting, just focus on your Tinder profile
On Tuesday’s edition of “The Five,” Fox News host Kimberly Guilfoyle suggested that young women, who apparently lack important conservative wisdom, should just go ahead and excuse themselves from voting in the midterms. According to Guilfoyle and her co-hosts, females of a certain age just “don’t get it,” which should probably disqualify them from serving on juries, or from exercising a crucial constitutional right they gained less than a century ago.
“It’s the same reason why young women on juries are not a good idea,” Guilfoyle said. “They don’t get it. They’re not in that same life experience of paying the bills, doing the mortgage, kids, community, crime, education, healthcare. They’re like healthy and hot and running around without a care in the world.”
LOL, And the GOP wonders why women don't vote for them.
Because of a remark by one TV commentator? Good grief.
[Edited on 10/23/2014 by alloak41]
Fox News is the voice of the GOP. Just another example of the conservative thought process and why they lost the female vote.
Whatever. As far as you know.
Has nothing to do with what I know Alloak the polls show the GOP has not been getting the votes of the groups I mentioned and even the parties leaders have acknowledged this and are trying to figure out how to reach these groups.
Fox News to young women: Don’t worry about voting, just focus on your Tinder profile
On Tuesday’s edition of “The Five,” Fox News host Kimberly Guilfoyle suggested that young women, who apparently lack important conservative wisdom, should just go ahead and excuse themselves from voting in the midterms. According to Guilfoyle and her co-hosts, females of a certain age just “don’t get it,” which should probably disqualify them from serving on juries, or from exercising a crucial constitutional right they gained less than a century ago.
“It’s the same reason why young women on juries are not a good idea,” Guilfoyle said. “They don’t get it. They’re not in that same life experience of paying the bills, doing the mortgage, kids, community, crime, education, healthcare. They’re like healthy and hot and running around without a care in the world.”
LOL, And the GOP wonders why women don't vote for them.
Because of a remark by one TV commentator? Good grief.
[Edited on 10/23/2014 by alloak41]
Fox News is the voice of the GOP. Just another example of the conservative thought process and why they lost the female vote.
Whatever. As far as you know.
Has nothing to do with what I know Alloak the polls show the GOP has not been getting the votes of the groups I mentioned and even the parties leaders have acknowledged this and are trying to figure out how to reach these groups.
______________________________________
Then why is Fox News the most watched (by far) and the most trusted news network on cable/satellite TV?
Fox News to young women: Don’t worry about voting, just focus on your Tinder profile
On Tuesday’s edition of “The Five,” Fox News host Kimberly Guilfoyle suggested that young women, who apparently lack important conservative wisdom, should just go ahead and excuse themselves from voting in the midterms. According to Guilfoyle and her co-hosts, females of a certain age just “don’t get it,” which should probably disqualify them from serving on juries, or from exercising a crucial constitutional right they gained less than a century ago.
“It’s the same reason why young women on juries are not a good idea,” Guilfoyle said. “They don’t get it. They’re not in that same life experience of paying the bills, doing the mortgage, kids, community, crime, education, healthcare. They’re like healthy and hot and running around without a care in the world.”
LOL, And the GOP wonders why women don't vote for them.
Because of a remark by one TV commentator? Good grief.
[Edited on 10/23/2014 by alloak41]
Fox News is the voice of the GOP. Just another example of the conservative thought process and why they lost the female vote.
Whatever. As far as you know.
Has nothing to do with what I know Alloak the polls show the GOP has not been getting the votes of the groups I mentioned and even the parties leaders have acknowledged this and are trying to figure out how to reach these groups.
Bill,
Glad you're stating these things. I've alluded to this in the past, but alloak has some idea that if the GOP just runs a more conservative candidate, it will make a difference. I don't buy that theory. The GOP does not nothing to appeal to the voting sectors you mentioned.
Bobby Jindal recognized this after the GOP lost again in 2012. I just don't see where any changes have been made to appeal to a wider base. Below are Jindal's own words:
Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal hurled harsh criticism at his own party after the GOP was blindsided in the 2012 elections, telling Republicans to end "dumbed-down conservatism" by putting a stop to "offensive, bizarre" comments.
“It is no secret we had a number of Republicans damage our brand this year with offensive, bizarre comments -- enough of that,” Jindal told Politico. “It’s not going to be the last time anyone says something stupid within our party, but it can’t be tolerated within our party. We’ve also had enough of this dumbed-down conservatism. We need to stop being simplistic, we need to trust the intelligence of the American people and we need to stop insulting the intelligence of the voters.”
Jindal told Politico Republicans should “stop being the stupid party” by working to embrace a larger group of constituents rather than becoming the party of "big anything."
Jindal offered nothing earth-shattering here. Don't make stupid comments. Gee thanks.
Bobby!
As far as your groups. The Democrats support from both women and Hispanics is
slipping. Why?
Glad you're stating these things. I've alluded to this in the past, but alloak has some idea that if the GOP just runs a more conservative candidate, it will make a difference. I don't buy that theory.
Right. Making the same mistake over and over again is a better plan.
Jindal offered nothing earth-shattering here. Don't make stupid comments. Gee thanks.
Bobby!As far as your groups. The Democrats support from both women and Hispanics is
slipping. Why?
Let’s look at Jindal's lines of "telling Republicans to end "dumbed-down conservatism" and “stop being the stupid party” by working to embrace a larger group of constituents rather than becoming the party of big anything.
They may not be earth-shattering, but they say plenty and from a high up insider Governor in the GOP. He is smart enough to recognize the deficiency in the GOP and hurdles to jump. You can minimize if you choose.
Alloak, so you think the Dems support of women & Hispanics is slipping. So…with the GOP attitude toward immigration reform and attitude toward women with abortion, equal pay, and birth control, you must be in a dream world if you think the GOP will see any real increases in the vote from those sectors in 2016. Let’s say that Hillary runs. You don’t think she’ll pull even more of the women vote than Obama did in the last 2 elections? Priceless.
[Edited on 10/23/2014 by MartinD28]
[Edited on 10/23/2014 by MartinD28]
Glad you're stating these things. I've alluded to this in the past, but alloak has some idea that if the GOP just runs a more conservative candidate, it will make a difference. I don't buy that theory.
Right. Making the same mistake over and over again is a better plan.
I will pray for you that you get a really conservative candidate. He or she (a she doubtful in the GOP), will sure up the base, but the results will be no different than with a less than purely conservative candidate. The base turnout will not be enough to offset the voting sectors in a general election that are turned off to & don't identify with the GOP message and ideology.
He tells it like it is, people like that. If he helps the farmers out in those other states there, he could be a formidable candidate. Down with Chinese GMO corn!
I lived in Iowa for 3 and a half years. There are not that many farmers. Lots of machinery and some really big farms but not a lot of people working those farms. The folks that own those farms spend a lot of money getting folks elected.
Isn't ConAgra an American company? Don't they grow GMO corn?
I was referring to a little outsourcing going on. Having one country send the seeds to another country to grow it and then having that second country grow the corn and export it, either directly or thru any number of countries to where? Well Europe will not eat that stuff, they want fresh, organic food for their people.
Swiss-based seed firm Syngenta had applied for cultivation approval for its Viptera GMO corn in China, but later halted the process to focus on winning import permission for the grain, a company spokesman told Reuters.
Syngenta is being sued by grain exporters Cargill and Trans Coastal Supply Co for failing to gain import approval for the GMO corn, also known as MIR162, in China before selling the seed to farmers in the United States.
Jindal offered nothing earth-shattering here. Don't make stupid comments. Gee thanks.
Bobby!As far as your groups. The Democrats support from both women and Hispanics is
slipping. Why?Let’s look at Jindal's lines of "telling Republicans to end "dumbed-down conservatism" and “stop being the stupid party” by working to embrace a larger group of constituents rather than becoming the party of big anything.
They may not be earth-shattering, but they say plenty and from a high up insider Governor in the GOP. He is smart enough to recognize the deficiency in the GOP and hurdles to jump. You can minimize if you choose.
Alloak, so you think the Dems support of women & Hispanics is slipping. So…with the GOP attitude toward immigration reform and attitude toward women with abortion, equal pay, and birth control, you must be in a dream world if you think the GOP will see any real increases in the vote from those sectors in 2016. Let’s say that Hillary runs. You don’t think she’ll pull even more of the women vote than Obama did in the last 2 elections? Priceless.
[Edited on 10/23/2014 by MartinD28]
[Edited on 10/23/2014 by MartinD28]
That's three paragraphs, two edits, and assorted back flips to avoid answering
a question. Super job.
Jindal offered nothing earth-shattering here. Don't make stupid comments. Gee thanks.
Bobby!As far as your groups. The Democrats support from both women and Hispanics is
slipping. Why?Let’s look at Jindal's lines of "telling Republicans to end "dumbed-down conservatism" and “stop being the stupid party” by working to embrace a larger group of constituents rather than becoming the party of big anything.
They may not be earth-shattering, but they say plenty and from a high up insider Governor in the GOP. He is smart enough to recognize the deficiency in the GOP and hurdles to jump. You can minimize if you choose.
Alloak, so you think the Dems support of women & Hispanics is slipping. So…with the GOP attitude toward immigration reform and attitude toward women with abortion, equal pay, and birth control, you must be in a dream world if you think the GOP will see any real increases in the vote from those sectors in 2016. Let’s say that Hillary runs. You don’t think she’ll pull even more of the women vote than Obama did in the last 2 elections? Priceless.
[Edited on 10/23/2014 by MartinD28]
[Edited on 10/23/2014 by MartinD28]
That's three paragraphs, two edits, and assorted back flips to avoid answering
a question. Super job.
I don't do back flips, but I do edits to assure proper grammar & spelling - not like some that post here.
Glad you're impressed. Now step up to the plate & accept one of the several bets I've challenged you on for the 2016 election. Show us that you back your beliefs. So far your avoidance speaks volumes.
Why are the liberals talking about the 2016 presidential election?
Could it be because they don't want to talk about the mid-terms where it is clear that they will get whipped again?
AMF Harry Reid !
Why are the liberals talking about the 2016 presidential election?
Could it be because they don't want to talk about the mid-terms where it is clear that they will get whipped again?
AMF Harry Reid !
This thread was started by alloak41 who is definitely not a liberal.
Why are the liberals talking about the 2016 presidential election?
Could it be because they don't want to talk about the mid-terms where it is clear that they will get whipped again?
AMF Harry Reid !
This thread was started by alloak41 who is definitely not a liberal.
_____________________________________
Nice deflection from answering the question.
Why are the liberals talking about the 2016 presidential election?
Could it be because they don't want to talk about the mid-terms where it is clear that they will get whipped again?
AMF Harry Reid !
This thread was started by alloak41 who is definitely not a liberal.
_____________________________________
Nice deflection from answering the question.
1. That is funny coming from someone who never answers questions because he isn't intelligent enough to have an adult conversation.
2. I answered your question. You aren't smart enough to understand.
Why are the liberals talking about the 2016 presidential election?
Could it be because they don't want to talk about the mid-terms where it is clear that they will get whipped again?
AMF Harry Reid !
Maybe because we are smart enough to understand that turnover in Congress is cyclical and don't get too upset about the midterm elections. The brassring is the Presidency which the Dems will most likely control for the next 10 years so enjoy! 
Why are the liberals talking about the 2016 presidential election?
Could it be because they don't want to talk about the mid-terms where it is clear that they will get whipped again?
AMF Harry Reid !
Maybe because we are smart enough to understand that turnover in Congress is cyclical and don't get too upset about the midterm elections.
The brassring is the Presidency which the Dems will most likely control for the next 10 years so enjoy!
1. If it's cyclical, does that mean you think the Democrats will take back control of
the House in the upcoming election?
2. That's a pretty bold statement, being that the Presidency also runs in cycles.
Not only that, but so much can happen in politics. Plus, we don't even know who
the candidates are, have not heard one speech, have not seen one debate.
Why are the liberals talking about the 2016 presidential election?
Could it be because they don't want to talk about the mid-terms where it is clear that they will get whipped again?
AMF Harry Reid !
Maybe because we are smart enough to understand that turnover in Congress is cyclical and don't get too upset about the midterm elections.
The brassring is the Presidency which the Dems will most likely control for the next 10 years so enjoy!
1. If it's cyclical, does that mean you think the Democrats will take back control of
the House in the upcoming election?2. That's a pretty bold statement, being that the Presidency also runs in cycles.
Not only that, but so much can happen in politics. Plus, we don't even know who
the candidates are, have not heard one speech, have not seen one debate.
I already provided you proof that very few Presidents have a majority in Congress and they seem to be able to manage no problem so losing the majority in these midterms is not the end of the world you conservatives like to think it is.
Not a bold statement at all because unless Hillary has some major health issue in the next couple of years I have no doubt she will be the Democratic nominee for President and as far as I can see the GOP is in shambles with no one on the horizon who can beat her.
I am so confident I have offered you a wager but evidently you know I am most likely correct so I don't blame you for not taking me up on it. 😉
Not a bold statement at all because unless Hillary has some major health issue
in the next couple of years I have no doubt she will be the Democratic nominee for
President...
What do you mean "unless?" She already has major health issues.
Hillary's health is shot from chasing the money.Bills too. They can stick their Clinton agenda
Not a bold statement at all because unless Hillary has some major health issue
in the next couple of years I have no doubt she will be the Democratic nominee for
President...L
What do you mean "unless?" She already has major health issues.
What are these health issues? Is it the fainting spell that you guys claim she faked to get out of testifying about Benghazi? Please enlighten us about these health problems that only you seem to know about.
Hillary's health is shot from chasing the money.Bills too. They can stick their Clinton agenda
Another genius spreads his insight. 😛
"Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists"
This statement (or one very similar) made by President Bush at the time really bothered me. I felt as though someone needed to remind him that he was not The King of America. There was so much flag waving fervor because of 911; just showed me how easily manipulated the voting populace can be in difficult times. Kind of like the CDC telling us "Not to worry about Ebola, we've the situation under control"
Right.
Back to topic, the mere thought of Hillary Clinton calling the shots scares the living Hell out of me.
So specifically who would you feel comfortable with calling the shots? Names?
Two years away from the Election and I can place my vote....nowhere. But I can say with an unparalleled degree of certainty who will not be receiving my vote in the next Presidential election.
"Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists"
This statement (or one very similar) made by President Bush at the time really bothered me. I felt as though someone needed to remind him that he was not The King of America. There was so much flag waving fervor because of 911; just showed me how easily manipulated the voting populace can be in difficult times. Kind of like the CDC telling us "Not to worry about Ebola, we've the situation under control"
Right.
Back to topic, the mere thought of Hillary Clinton calling the shots scares the living Hell out of me.
So specifically who would you feel comfortable with calling the shots? Names?
Two years away from the Election and I can place my vote....nowhere. But I can say with an unparalleled degree of certainty who will not be receiving my vote in the next Presidential election.
That is a copout. It is the easiest thing in the world to oppose every candidate. That way you can complain about whoever is elected for four years by saying "I didn't vote for him". You have the right to feel however you wish, but when you constantly come out against everyone and everything it is difficult to take your stand or lack thereof seriously.
"Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists"
This statement (or one very similar) made by President Bush at the time really bothered me. I felt as though someone needed to remind him that he was not The King of America. There was so much flag waving fervor because of 911; just showed me how easily manipulated the voting populace can be in difficult times. Kind of like the CDC telling us "Not to worry about Ebola, we've the situation under control"
Right.
Back to topic, the mere thought of Hillary Clinton calling the shots scares the living Hell out of me.
So specifically who would you feel comfortable with calling the shots? Names?
Two years away from the Election and I can place my vote....nowhere. But I can say with an unparalleled degree of certainty who will not be receiving my vote in the next Presidential election.
nobody can vote for President yet my friend but some of us have people we feel would make good candidates for President as I feel about Hillary. There must be someone you would feel good about and might support if they were declare their candidacy yes?
Ah, the liberals here want the conservatives to name their choice for president 2016 while they name none.
Baiting the hook?
Not a bold statement at all because unless Hillary has some major health issue
in the next couple of years I have no doubt she will be the Democratic nominee for
President...L
What do you mean "unless?" She already has major health issues.What are these health issues? Is it the fainting spell that you guys claim she faked to get out of testifying about Benghazi? Please enlighten us about these health problems that only you seem to know about.
They are well-chronicled in "Blood Feud." I think you'll agree that it's highly unlikely
that Klein would fabricate these issues and open himself up to a slam dunk legal action.
Also odd, nobody from the Clinton camp has refuted any of it.
On her fainting, it's not an isolated incident to say the least. She has demonstrated
a pattern of being faint prone, which often points to a serous health problem.
Just letting logic and documentation be the judge.
Not a bold statement at all because unless Hillary has some major health issue
in the next couple of years I have no doubt she will be the Democratic nominee for
President...L
What do you mean "unless?" She already has major health issues.What are these health issues? Is it the fainting spell that you guys claim she faked to get out of testifying about Benghazi? Please enlighten us about these health problems that only you seem to know about.
They are well-chronicled in "Blood Feud." I think you'll agree that it's highly unlikely
that Klein would fabricate these issues and open himself up to a slam dunk legal action.
Also odd, nobody from the Clinton camp has refuted any of it.On her fainting, it's not an isolated incident to say the least. She has demonstrated
a pattern of being faint prone, which often points to a serous health problem.Just letting logic and documentation be the judge.
Did you read Blood Feud? Klein prefaces almost all of his remarks about Hillary with the words "I believe". In other words, it is his opinion. Is he a doctor? He also says that he believed that Hillary has lost the urge to run, but will run anyway. Does that make sense to you? Pure speculation on the authors part.
"Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists"
This statement (or one very similar) made by President Bush at the time really bothered me. I felt as though someone needed to remind him that he was not The King of America. There was so much flag waving fervor because of 911; just showed me how easily manipulated the voting populace can be in difficult times. Kind of like the CDC telling us "Not to worry about Ebola, we've the situation under control"
Right.
Back to topic, the mere thought of Hillary Clinton calling the shots scares the living Hell out of me.
So specifically who would you feel comfortable with calling the shots? Names?
Two years away from the Election and I can place my vote....nowhere. But I can say with an unparalleled degree of certainty who will not be receiving my vote in the next Presidential election.
That is a copout. It is the easiest thing in the world to oppose every candidate. That way you can complain about whoever is elected for four years by saying "I didn't vote for him". You have the right to feel however you wish, but when you constantly come out against everyone and everything it is difficult to take your stand or lack thereof seriously.
Wow. Fundamental reading skills not your thing, huh? I will not vote for Hillary is what this post clearly reads. "Two years away from the Election and I can place my vote....nowhere"...is my exact quote from above.
Name all of the Candidates for President who have declared so far. I'll wait. Kind of hard to choose when there are no people to vote for. The Presidential election is when?...Please refresh my memory!
That is correct. 2016. What year is this? So quite accurately, I can not yet state who I would back, because NO ONE has yet made their Candidacy a certainty.
Name "Everyone" I have "come out against" so far by name, once again , I will wait.
Wow, just wow.
Not a bold statement at all because unless Hillary has some major health issue
in the next couple of years I have no doubt she will be the Democratic nominee for
President...L
What do you mean "unless?" She already has major health issues.What are these health issues? Is it the fainting spell that you guys claim she faked to get out of testifying about Benghazi? Please enlighten us about these health problems that only you seem to know about.
They are well-chronicled in "Blood Feud." I think you'll agree that it's highly unlikely
that Klein would fabricate these issues and open himself up to a slam dunk legal action.
Also odd, nobody from the Clinton camp has refuted any of it.On her fainting, it's not an isolated incident to say the least. She has demonstrated
a pattern of being faint prone, which often points to a serous health problem.Just letting logic and documentation be the judge.
LOL your argument is based on quoting "Blood Feud"? that book is no better than the National Enquirer and its hack author Klein had his contract terminated with Harper Collins because of their concern with the quality of his reporting.
just read some of the insane stuff this guy wrote in the fantasy novel
http://www.buzzfeed.com/katherinemiller/bloooood-feuuuuuud#1v01yn6
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/07/blood-feud-obama-clinton_n_5565199.html
Alloak you have lost all rights to ever criticize anyone for the sources they post here
