Thanks for the tip, but a google search DID reveal she was fired for fraud and ethics violations. In the internet age, I guess what to believe just depends on the source. In Hillary's case, her own track record makes it a fairly easy choice. She's pretty slimy.

Truthorfiction.com and snipes are both wrong?

Sorry alloak. You are wrong. But you still believe there was a White House cover up of Benghazi. The sky is yellow the sun is blue. You are drunk on the kool aide to your own detriment.

Thanks for the tip, but a google search DID reveal she was fired for fraud and ethics violations. In the internet age, I guess what to believe just depends on the source. In Hillary's case, her own track record makes it a fairly easy choice. She's pretty slimy.

Truthorfiction.com and snipes are both wrong?

Sorry alloak. You are wrong. But you still believe there was a White House cover up of Benghazi. The sky is yellow the sun is blue. You are drunk on the kool aide to your own detriment.

1. Who fact checks these fact checking sites?

2. I could be wrong, I could be right. We'll never know now. We'll never know the whole story.

Pace yourself keller, its going to be a long road having to carry water for the Clintons. This is only the begining. Nothing from Hills defenders even made sense last week relating to a plausible explanation. It would have been better to just go ahead and admit it was an attempt to create a shield in a high level job to control any accountability.

Not much choice. They're all in on Hillary and now must defend her to the hilt. I'm glad
I don't have to. Her sleazy practices around files and records goes back to Watergate, when
she was fired for fraud and ethics violations.

Please show me where I "carried water" or am "all in" on Hillary.

No idea who he is talking about, but must be people he knows outside of this forum because no one here is "all in" on her as far as I can tell.

Who's the alternative? Nobody?

Why do you care? You aren't going to vote for her. I think you should be more concerned about who the Republicans will nominate. All you talk about is Hillary, Hillary and more Hillary. You are either afraid of her or you have a crush on her.

Thanks for the tip, but a google search DID reveal she was fired for fraud and ethics violations. In the internet age, I guess what to believe just depends on the source. In Hillary's case, her own track record makes it a fairly easy choice. She's pretty slimy.

Truthorfiction.com and snipes are both wrong?

Sorry alloak. You are wrong. But you still believe there was a White House cover up of Benghazi. The sky is yellow the sun is blue. You are drunk on the kool aide to your own detriment.

1. Who fact checks these fact checking sites?

2. I could be wrong, I could be right. We'll never know now. We'll never know the whole story.

If someone fact checked the fact check sites, who would fact checkers of the fact checkers?

1. Who fact checks these fact checking sites?

2. I could be wrong, I could be right. We'll never know now. We'll never know the whole story.

So basically you are saying you don't believe in evidence. The Benghazi report culminated from a very, very expensive Republican led investigation cleared the White House and Hillary but you just don't agree. Your gut tells you more.

Why even take part in the debate if you reject facts?

It's a Hillary Clinton thread.

Hello.

Thanks for the tip, but a google search DID reveal she was fired for fraud and ethics violations. In the internet age, I guess what to believe just depends on the source. In Hillary's case, her own track record makes it a fairly easy choice. She's pretty slimy.

Truthorfiction.com and snipes are both wrong?

Sorry alloak. You are wrong. But you still believe there was a White House cover up of Benghazi. The sky is yellow the sun is blue. You are drunk on the kool aide to your own detriment.

1. Who fact checks these fact checking sites?

2. I could be wrong, I could be right. We'll never know now. We'll never know the whole story.

If someone fact checked the fact check sites, who would fact checkers of the fact checkers?

Exactly.

Thanks for the tip, but a google search DID reveal she was fired for fraud and ethics violations. In the internet age, I guess what to believe just depends on the source. In Hillary's case, her own track record makes it a fairly easy choice. She's pretty slimy.

Truthorfiction.com and snipes are both wrong?

Sorry alloak. You are wrong. But you still believe there was a White House cover up of Benghazi. The sky is yellow the sun is blue. You are drunk on the kool aide to your own detriment.

1. Who fact checks these fact checking sites?

2. I could be wrong, I could be right. We'll never know now. We'll never know the whole story.

If someone fact checked the fact check sites, who would fact checkers of the fact checkers?

Exactly.

No, not at all. Sites like snopes are nonpartisan and vet their info. They have no agenda other than the truth. The fact that you don't agree with them doesn't make them unreliable. It just makes you wrong.

1. Who fact checks these fact checking sites?

2. I could be wrong, I could be right. We'll never know now. We'll never know the whole story.

So basically you are saying you don't believe in evidence. The Benghazi report culminated from a very, very expensive Republican led investigation cleared the White House and Hillary but you just don't agree. Your gut tells you more.

Why even take part in the debate if you reject facts?

Like I said, I could be dead wrong. We'll never know one way or another.

1. Who fact checks these fact checking sites?

2. I could be wrong, I could be right. We'll never know now. We'll never know the whole story.

So basically you are saying you don't believe in evidence. The Benghazi report culminated from a very, very expensive Republican led investigation cleared the White House and Hillary but you just don't agree. Your gut tells you more.

Why even take part in the debate if you reject facts?

X2

The GOP spent buckets of the peoples' money & time over & over again on the same investigation. They never got the desired end result...so back to the drawing board. There's got to be something under a rock somewhere that will vindicate Darrell Issa. Oh wait...they found it, and his name is Trey Gowdy.

Don't they have something more productive to do...like not voting to fund Homeland Security or shut down the government?

The committee that investigated Benghazi did not have subpoena power, obama’s administration and the state department refused to hand over the requested documents and Hillary took two years to scrub her private emails.
The state department and the justice department refused to allow the personnel that were on the ground in Libya to testify and upon their return to the U.S. demanded that they re-sign non-disclosure agreements.

Hillary is just now turning over some of her secreted emails in an attempt to slow walk the subpoena issued by the new committee. In the few emails turned over so far there are huge gaps around the time period of the attacks.

The GOP had nothing to do with the murders of our Ambassador and 3 other Americans and the ensuing cover up. That falls to Hillary who personally denied their repeated requests for additional security.

I can’t wait for her to blame “The vast right wing conspiracy” she tried when her husband got caught lying under oath and adultery.

benghazi? check,check, is this mike on?

___________________________________________________________________

Still can't read eh?
I'm sure obama has a literacy program for you.

I don't see the Republicans winning anytime soon. If they truly believe in trickle-down economics, and less entitlement spending, then SHOW how your theory actually works. If the problem lies with the dumb low-info voters, then figure out a way to connect with them about how conservative economics will help them. One must admit that it's a tough pill to swallow for the average 18-34 year old when someone tells them, "I know you work 50 hours a week, and make $45k per year, but I'm only going to cut taxes for the richest 1%, because I believe they are going to reinvest that extra money back into the country's infrastructure. I will not support gay rights because God says it's wrong, so I'm sorry if you or a loved one is gay. I will allow the mentally ill to purchase any type of gun because tougher testing is an inconvenience for some people, and if 20 kids die in a shootout, so be it. If you are poor and need government assistance, it's your fault because you didn't work hard enough. Why? Because I heard about a person who rose out of the ghetto and became successful, so therefore everyone should be able to do it. And I will definitely invade a country at some point. Now can I count on your vote?"

benghazi? check,check, is this mike on?

___________________________________________________________________

Still can't read eh?
I'm sure obama has a literacy program for you.

Youze da fancy talk r at da trala pak yo. go huff anotha cana krylon tubby!

___-_______________________________________________________

Look!
Pops tried to write again.
And failed again.

Hillary is not the ideal candidate by any stretch but for me she is better than any alternative the GOP seems to be able to offer at this point.

Why isn't she the ideal candidate? Just curious.

[Edited on 3/10/2015 by alloak41]

She is a little too much of a politician and centrist IMHO. Like most Washington politicians she avoids answering the tough questions on the controversial issues but that is exactly the thing that will get her elected.

But with all her warts I still think she will make a decent President with Bubba as her mentor and I am confident they will build a strong cabinet to support her.

Like I said she is not my idea of the ideal candidate but she sure beats what the GOP has to offer IMHO.

Personally I would love to see Elizabeth Warren get elected as she is a fighter for the common man and is not afraid to buck the old boy system in Washington but I am afraid she is too progressive for conservative America.

ALERT !

hillary will "address" the email matter this afternoon after she makes a speech at the u.n.

Stay tuned folks, this will be interesting.

ALERT !

hillary will "address" the email matter this afternoon after she makes a speech at the u.n.

Stay tuned folks, this will be interesting.

An interesting stream of lies.

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ALERT !

hillary will "address" the email matter this afternoon after she makes a speech at the u.n.

Stay tuned folks, this will be interesting.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

An interesting stream of lies.

As opposed to those politicians that tell the truth?

I have no idea what the extent of wrongdoing by Hillary Clinton is in the email affair, but if one is to believe polls and tracking, this is not a resonating issue with the public beyond the expected partisan lines.

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ALERT !

hillary will "address" the email matter this afternoon after she makes a speech at the u.n.

Stay tuned folks, this will be interesting.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

An interesting stream of lies.

As opposed to those politicians that tell the truth?

Just like clockwork. "Everybody does it"

ALERT !

hillary will "address" the email matter this afternoon after she makes a speech at the u.n.

Stay tuned folks, this will be interesting.

An interesting stream of lies.

Just like clockwork, guilty until proven innocent.

ALERT !

hillary will "address" the email matter this afternoon after she makes a speech at the u.n.

Stay tuned folks, this will be interesting.

An interesting stream of lies.

Just like clockwork, guilty until proven innocent.

Yeah, I'm really going out on a limb.

Just like clockwork.....b*tch only when the opposing side does it. Stay quiet when your group does it.

ALERT !

hillary will "address" the email matter this afternoon after she makes a speech at the u.n.

Stay tuned folks, this will be interesting.

An interesting stream of lies.

Just like clockwork, guilty until proven innocent.

Yeah, I'm really going out on a limb.

No, just you being you.

[Edited on 3/10/2015 by jkeller]

I have no idea what the extent of wrongdoing by Hillary Clinton is in the email affair, but if one is to believe polls and tracking, this is not a resonating issue with the public beyond the expected partisan lines.

The email affair, yes. Surely going nowhere since others have done it. Servers in basements are a dime a dozen.

Well, how many of her boosters condone the Secretary of State accepting hundreds of millions in foreign donations while serving in that capacity? After all the complaining about the influence of money in politics, politicians being for sale, and what not. Should our highest ranking diplomat be collecting money from foreign nations? Just curious.

Prepared now to hear about all the others who have done it....

Good thing the aide cut that presser short. The answers were getting a little hesitant. She was getting a little testy and that face getting a little red.

Interesting that she never came clean and admitted a third party arbiter should examine the server and verify her claims. We'll just have to take her word for it.

I have no idea what the extent of wrongdoing by Hillary Clinton is in the email affair, but if one is to believe polls and tracking, this is not a resonating issue with the public beyond the expected partisan lines.

The email affair, yes. Surely going nowhere since others have done it. Servers in basements are a dime a dozen.

Well, how many of her boosters condone the Secretary of State accepting hundreds of millions in foreign donations while serving in that capacity? After all the complaining about the influence of money in politics, politicians being for sale, and what not. Should our highest ranking diplomat be collecting money from foreign nations? Just curious.

Prepared now to hear about all the others who have done it....

All the crap that's gone on in DC for decades, now you're gonna draw a moral line in the sand and say "Now we should all come together and root out all the evils done by everyo...I mean, Democrats in government! I come from a group of infallible purists who never do anything wrong and you can kiss my a$$ if you think I'd admit it anyway! Let's unite, everyone!"

???

Freakin' vomit-inducing.

Good thing the aide cut that presser short. The answers were getting a little hesitant. She was getting a little testy and that face getting a little red.

Interesting that she never came clean and admitted a third party arbiter should examine the server and verify her claims. We'll just have to take her word for it.

Yeah, a woman who has dealt with the press for years came into this one and got a lot of questions she never anticipated and was on the verge of losing it. Good thing you figured that out. Nothing gets by you. Who needs news outlets, snopes, others opinions etc. We have alloak who can see into the souls of evildoers everywhere on the left.

I still think that alloak has a crush on Hillary since she seems to be all that he wants to talk about

Good thing the aide cut that presser short. The answers were getting a little hesitant. She was getting a little testy and that face getting a little red.

Interesting that she never came clean and admitted a third party arbiter should examine the server and verify her claims. We'll just have to take her word for it.

Yeah, a woman who has dealt with the press for years came into this one and got a lot of questions she never anticipated and was on the verge of losing it. Good thing you figured that out. Nothing gets by you. Who needs news outlets, snopes, others opinions etc. We have alloak who can see into the souls of evildoers everywhere on the left.

Don't forget "Democrat brothers and sisters."

As if.