Did Bush Lie?

Yeah, this one?
Yep, was done with it until mule came along and turned it into one of the most entertaining threads in the entire interwebs. So thanks for getting the ball rolling!

Yeah, this one?
Yep, was done with it until mule came along and turned it into one of the most entertaining threads in the entire interwebs. So thanks for getting the ball rolling!
![]()
So you came back just to insult Mule?

Yeah, this one?
Yep, was done with it until mule came along and turned it into one of the most entertaining threads in the entire interwebs. So thanks for getting the ball rolling!
![]()
So you came back just to insult Mule?
Yes, right, Jerry. That's exactly it.

The far-left ideologues here are intellectually dishonest.
You rail about President Bush and the Iraq war. Instead of standing up with the American People and going all in to defeat Islamic Extremist Terrorism, you constantly lie and try to diminish what the American People support.
The far-left claims it was an illegal war but it was duly authorized by The Congress, including the democrats. The far-left says that claims President Bush went into Iraq unilaterally when he was able to assemble an international coalition of more than 65 countries that actually participated as opposed to Obama’s phantom coalition which, with the exception of 3 countries, does not exist.
The liberal media told you that there were no WMD and you believe it even when it has been proven that Saddam both had and used WMD.
The war on Islamic Extremist Terrorism became necessary after 9/11. The terrorist attacks happened because Clinton ignored the threat and the repeated attacks on the U.S. by Al Qaeda. It was the failure of the Clinton administration to act that got almost 3,000 people killed on 9/11. But of course the liberals blame President Bush, another flat out lie.
Al-Qaeda in Iraq did exist and had to be taken out which President Bush accomplished. In comes Obama who cut and ran allowing ISIS to form and we are now back fighting in Iraq.
The far-left continues to fight against defeating Islamic Extremist Terrorism and simply wants to retreat which would allow terrorism to continue killing.
It is easy to understand why. The far-left are completely controlled by the liberal media who propagate the false notions they hold. This is easily done to those with an ill-informed, ideology driven weak mind.
Oh well. You keep lying while your little group continues to shrink. Fortunately The American People know better.

The far-left ideologues here are intellectually dishonest.
You rail about President Bush and the Iraq war. Instead of standing up with the American People and going all in to defeat Islamic Extremist Terrorism, you constantly lie and try to diminish what the American People support.
The far-left claims it was an illegal war but it was duly authorized by The Congress, including the democrats. The far-left says that claims President Bush went into Iraq unilaterally when he was able to assemble an international coalition of more than 65 countries that actually participated as opposed to Obama’s phantom coalition which, with the exception of 3 countries, does not exist.
The liberal media told you that there were no WMD and you believe it even when it has been proven that Saddam both had and used WMD.
The war on Islamic Extremist Terrorism became necessary after 9/11. The terrorist attacks happened because Clinton ignored the threat and the repeated attacks on the U.S. by Al Qaeda. It was the failure of the Clinton administration to act that got almost 3,000 people killed on 9/11. But of course the liberals blame President Bush, another flat out lie.
Al-Qaeda in Iraq did exist and had to be taken out which President Bush accomplished. In comes Obama who cut and ran allowing ISIS to form and we are now back fighting in Iraq.
The far-left continues to fight against defeating Islamic Extremist Terrorism and simply wants to retreat which would allow terrorism to continue killing.It is easy to understand why. The far-left are completely controlled by the liberal media who propagate the false notions they hold. This is easily done to those with an ill-informed, ideology driven weak mind.
Oh well. You keep lying while your little group continues to shrink. Fortunately The American People know better.
Propagating the reality that the Iraq War was a huge mistake are Donald Trump, George H Bush, James Baker and Rand Paul, and there are many more on the right with a similar take.
You also fail to mention that North Korea really gained nuclear capability under George W Bush, another disaster in Bush decision making.

"You also fail to mention that North Korea really gained nuclear capability under George W Bush, another disaster in Bush decision making."
Typical far-left crap. Make a false premise and then attack someone based on your lie.

"You also fail to mention that North Korea really gained nuclear capability under George W Bush, another disaster in Bush decision making."
Typical far-left crap. Make a false premise and then attack someone based on your lie.
So how did North Korea get its hands on the nuclear material? George W. Bush became president in 2001 and was highly skeptical of Clinton’s deal with North Korea. The new administration terminated missile talks with Pyongyang and then spent months trying to develop its own policy.
Then intelligence agencies determined that North Korea was cheating on the agreement by trying to develop nuclear material through another method — highly-enriched uranium. The Bush administration sent an envoy who confronted North Korea — and the regime was said to have belligerently confirmed it.
In response, the Bush administration terminated a supply of fuel oil that was essential to the agreement — and then North Korea quickly kicked out the U.N. inspectors, restarted the nuclear plant and began developing its nuclear weapons, using the material in radioactive fuel rods that previously had been under the close watch of the IAEA. Japan and South Korea, the key partners in the accord, were not happy with the decision to terminate the Agreed Framework, but there was little they could do about it.
After North Korea conducted its first nuclear test in 2006, the Bush administration tried desperately to negotiate a new accord with Pyongyang, including offering new concessions, but those efforts ultimately failed. The nuclear genie by then was out of the bottle. The issue was considered such a loser that the Obama administration has barely bothered to restart disarmament talks.

The far-left ideologues here are intellectually dishonest.
A hilarious statement coming from our bigoted liar-in-chief.

"You also fail to mention that North Korea really gained nuclear capability under George W Bush, another disaster in Bush decision making."
Typical far-left crap. Make a false premise and then attack someone based on your lie.
So how did North Korea get its hands on the nuclear material? George W. Bush became president in 2001 and was highly skeptical of Clinton’s deal with North Korea. The new administration terminated missile talks with Pyongyang and then spent months trying to develop its own policy.
Then intelligence agencies determined that North Korea was cheating on the agreement by trying to develop nuclear material through another method — highly-enriched uranium. The Bush administration sent an envoy who confronted North Korea — and the regime was said to have belligerently confirmed it.
In response, the Bush administration terminated a supply of fuel oil that was essential to the agreement — and then North Korea quickly kicked out the U.N. inspectors, restarted the nuclear plant and began developing its nuclear weapons, using the material in radioactive fuel rods that previously had been under the close watch of the IAEA. Japan and South Korea, the key partners in the accord, were not happy with the decision to terminate the Agreed Framework, but there was little they could do about it.
After North Korea conducted its first nuclear test in 2006, the Bush administration tried desperately to negotiate a new accord with Pyongyang, including offering new concessions, but those efforts ultimately failed. The nuclear genie by then was out of the bottle. The issue was considered such a loser that the Obama administration has barely bothered to restart disarmament talks.
_________________________________________________________________________
What else did you expect from that liberal rag?
The WAPO fact-checker is nothing more than a liberal opinion based on no facts.
The deflection issue of North Korea also has nothing to do with this thread but that never stops the left-wing fools who are unable to argue the point and need to go off topic in the meaningless posts.

"You also fail to mention that North Korea really gained nuclear capability under George W Bush, another disaster in Bush decision making."
Typical far-left crap. Make a false premise and then attack someone based on your lie.
So how did North Korea get its hands on the nuclear material? George W. Bush became president in 2001 and was highly skeptical of Clinton’s deal with North Korea. The new administration terminated missile talks with Pyongyang and then spent months trying to develop its own policy.
Then intelligence agencies determined that North Korea was cheating on the agreement by trying to develop nuclear material through another method — highly-enriched uranium. The Bush administration sent an envoy who confronted North Korea — and the regime was said to have belligerently confirmed it.
In response, the Bush administration terminated a supply of fuel oil that was essential to the agreement — and then North Korea quickly kicked out the U.N. inspectors, restarted the nuclear plant and began developing its nuclear weapons, using the material in radioactive fuel rods that previously had been under the close watch of the IAEA. Japan and South Korea, the key partners in the accord, were not happy with the decision to terminate the Agreed Framework, but there was little they could do about it.
After North Korea conducted its first nuclear test in 2006, the Bush administration tried desperately to negotiate a new accord with Pyongyang, including offering new concessions, but those efforts ultimately failed. The nuclear genie by then was out of the bottle. The issue was considered such a loser that the Obama administration has barely bothered to restart disarmament talks.
_________________________________________________________________________
What else did you expect from that liberal rag?
The WAPO fact-checker is nothing more than a liberal opinion based on no facts.The deflection issue of North Korea also has nothing to do with this thread but that never stops the left-wing fools who are unable to argue the point and need to go off topic in the meaningless posts.
Irony at its finest.

"You also fail to mention that North Korea really gained nuclear capability under George W Bush, another disaster in Bush decision making."
Typical far-left crap. Make a false premise and then attack someone based on your lie.
So how did North Korea get its hands on the nuclear material? George W. Bush became president in 2001 and was highly skeptical of Clinton’s deal with North Korea. The new administration terminated missile talks with Pyongyang and then spent months trying to develop its own policy.
Then intelligence agencies determined that North Korea was cheating on the agreement by trying to develop nuclear material through another method — highly-enriched uranium. The Bush administration sent an envoy who confronted North Korea — and the regime was said to have belligerently confirmed it.
In response, the Bush administration terminated a supply of fuel oil that was essential to the agreement — and then North Korea quickly kicked out the U.N. inspectors, restarted the nuclear plant and began developing its nuclear weapons, using the material in radioactive fuel rods that previously had been under the close watch of the IAEA. Japan and South Korea, the key partners in the accord, were not happy with the decision to terminate the Agreed Framework, but there was little they could do about it.
After North Korea conducted its first nuclear test in 2006, the Bush administration tried desperately to negotiate a new accord with Pyongyang, including offering new concessions, but those efforts ultimately failed. The nuclear genie by then was out of the bottle. The issue was considered such a loser that the Obama administration has barely bothered to restart disarmament talks.
_________________________________________________________________________
What else did you expect from that liberal rag?
The WAPO fact-checker is nothing more than a liberal opinion based on no facts.The deflection issue of North Korea also has nothing to do with this thread but that never stops the left-wing fools who are unable to argue the point and need to go off topic in the meaningless posts.
Irony at its finest.
______________________________________________________________________
Deflection defined.

"You also fail to mention that North Korea really gained nuclear capability under George W Bush, another disaster in Bush decision making."
Typical far-left crap. Make a false premise and then attack someone based on your lie.
So how did North Korea get its hands on the nuclear material? George W. Bush became president in 2001 and was highly skeptical of Clinton’s deal with North Korea. The new administration terminated missile talks with Pyongyang and then spent months trying to develop its own policy.
Then intelligence agencies determined that North Korea was cheating on the agreement by trying to develop nuclear material through another method — highly-enriched uranium. The Bush administration sent an envoy who confronted North Korea — and the regime was said to have belligerently confirmed it.
In response, the Bush administration terminated a supply of fuel oil that was essential to the agreement — and then North Korea quickly kicked out the U.N. inspectors, restarted the nuclear plant and began developing its nuclear weapons, using the material in radioactive fuel rods that previously had been under the close watch of the IAEA. Japan and South Korea, the key partners in the accord, were not happy with the decision to terminate the Agreed Framework, but there was little they could do about it.
After North Korea conducted its first nuclear test in 2006, the Bush administration tried desperately to negotiate a new accord with Pyongyang, including offering new concessions, but those efforts ultimately failed. The nuclear genie by then was out of the bottle. The issue was considered such a loser that the Obama administration has barely bothered to restart disarmament talks.
_________________________________________________________________________
What else did you expect from that liberal rag?
The WAPO fact-checker is nothing more than a liberal opinion based on no facts.The deflection issue of North Korea also has nothing to do with this thread but that never stops the left-wing fools who are unable to argue the point and need to go off topic in the meaningless posts.
Irony at its finest.
______________________________________________________________________
Deflection defined.
Genius, when you attack the source rather than comment on the content, you show a lack of intelligence that is obvious to all.

"You also fail to mention that North Korea really gained nuclear capability under George W Bush, another disaster in Bush decision making."
Typical far-left crap. Make a false premise and then attack someone based on your lie.
So how did North Korea get its hands on the nuclear material? George W. Bush became president in 2001 and was highly skeptical of Clinton’s deal with North Korea. The new administration terminated missile talks with Pyongyang and then spent months trying to develop its own policy.
Then intelligence agencies determined that North Korea was cheating on the agreement by trying to develop nuclear material through another method — highly-enriched uranium. The Bush administration sent an envoy who confronted North Korea — and the regime was said to have belligerently confirmed it.
In response, the Bush administration terminated a supply of fuel oil that was essential to the agreement — and then North Korea quickly kicked out the U.N. inspectors, restarted the nuclear plant and began developing its nuclear weapons, using the material in radioactive fuel rods that previously had been under the close watch of the IAEA. Japan and South Korea, the key partners in the accord, were not happy with the decision to terminate the Agreed Framework, but there was little they could do about it.
After North Korea conducted its first nuclear test in 2006, the Bush administration tried desperately to negotiate a new accord with Pyongyang, including offering new concessions, but those efforts ultimately failed. The nuclear genie by then was out of the bottle. The issue was considered such a loser that the Obama administration has barely bothered to restart disarmament talks.
_________________________________________________________________________
What else did you expect from that liberal rag?
The WAPO fact-checker is nothing more than a liberal opinion based on no facts.The deflection issue of North Korea also has nothing to do with this thread but that never stops the left-wing fools who are unable to argue the point and need to go off topic in the meaningless posts.
Irony at its finest.
______________________________________________________________________
Deflection defined.
Genius, when you attack the source rather than comment on the content, you show a lack of intelligence that is obvious to all.
______________________________________________________________________
When the source is known for its left-wing bias it shows the poster's ignorance.
Sadly you are one of that little club that differentiate opinion from fact.
This is also why the lefties here throw a temper tantrum when the facts destroy their opinion.

"You also fail to mention that North Korea really gained nuclear capability under George W Bush, another disaster in Bush decision making."
Typical far-left crap. Make a false premise and then attack someone based on your lie.
So how did North Korea get its hands on the nuclear material? George W. Bush became president in 2001 and was highly skeptical of Clinton’s deal with North Korea. The new administration terminated missile talks with Pyongyang and then spent months trying to develop its own policy.
Then intelligence agencies determined that North Korea was cheating on the agreement by trying to develop nuclear material through another method — highly-enriched uranium. The Bush administration sent an envoy who confronted North Korea — and the regime was said to have belligerently confirmed it.
In response, the Bush administration terminated a supply of fuel oil that was essential to the agreement — and then North Korea quickly kicked out the U.N. inspectors, restarted the nuclear plant and began developing its nuclear weapons, using the material in radioactive fuel rods that previously had been under the close watch of the IAEA. Japan and South Korea, the key partners in the accord, were not happy with the decision to terminate the Agreed Framework, but there was little they could do about it.
After North Korea conducted its first nuclear test in 2006, the Bush administration tried desperately to negotiate a new accord with Pyongyang, including offering new concessions, but those efforts ultimately failed. The nuclear genie by then was out of the bottle. The issue was considered such a loser that the Obama administration has barely bothered to restart disarmament talks.
_________________________________________________________________________
What else did you expect from that liberal rag?
The WAPO fact-checker is nothing more than a liberal opinion based on no facts.The deflection issue of North Korea also has nothing to do with this thread but that never stops the left-wing fools who are unable to argue the point and need to go off topic in the meaningless posts.
Irony at its finest.
______________________________________________________________________
Deflection defined.
Genius, when you attack the source rather than comment on the content, you show a lack of intelligence that is obvious to all.
______________________________________________________________________
When the source is known for its left-wing bias it shows the poster's ignorance.
Sadly you are one of that little club that differentiate opinion from fact.This is also why the lefties here throw a temper tantrum when the facts destroy their opinion.
The source is not an opinion piece. It is a news report. You post right wing opinion pieces and call them fact. Do you see the difference? No, it flies over your head.
Refute the piece or STFU. 😛

Yeah, this one?
Yep, was done with it until mule came along and turned it into one of the most entertaining threads in the entire interwebs. So thanks for getting the ball rolling!
![]()
So you came back just to insult Mule?
Yes, right, Jerry. That's exactly it.
Well, at least you admit it.
- 75 Forums
- 15 K Topics
- 192.1 K Posts
- 6 Online
- 24.7 K Members