So you now support Black Lives Matter.

That's hard to believe.

he is an enigma wrapped in a blanket drowned in water.....or what ever the saying is

he is an enigma wrapped in a blanket drowned in water.....or what ever the saying is

Maybe. I think there may be some lye or sulphuric acid involved.

It's going to be fun reading the NY Times coverage about a cover up of information or great public interest that could have changed the outcome of an election. Cringe!

It's going to be fun reading the NY Times coverage about a cover up of information or great public interest that could have changed the outcome of an election. Cringe!

Well, there should be an investigation. BTW, Muleman, I don't think I'd call Emanuel "Obama's boy". He is far from that.

Mule -

What exactly is your point? Do you live here in Chicago? If not, come and visit. I can show you around. Rough times but great city.

Try the pizza and blues clubs. 😉

And I do think the protests have gone WAY too far. I just shake my head when I turn on the morning news. Why interrupt other people's lives?

Obama's boy?

Wow. Another day, another spewing of pig crap from Muleman's rotted, putrid, filthy, gob hole.

Hey Mule? Do you polish that black soul or does it stay that shade just by sucking in all the light of the universe?

Go play in traffic you disgusting waste of life.

Chicago residents continue to protest calling for the ouster of Mayor Rahm Emanuel.

A Black Chicago Democrat Legislator introduces legislation to recall Rahm Emanuel.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/10/politics/rahm-emanuel-recall-bill-protests/index.html

Emanuel recall bill, council hearing show political flank-covering in McDonald case

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/politics/ct-emanuel-recall-city-council-mcdonald-hearing-20151215-story.html

[Edited on 12/16/2015 by Muleman1994]

It's going to be fun reading the NY Times coverage about a cover up of information or great public interest that could have changed the outcome of an election. Cringe!

Well, there should be an investigation. BTW, Muleman, I don't think I'd call Emanuel "Obama's boy". He is far from that.

My point here was the fact that the NY Times greatly aided Bush's second-term campaign (and probably saved it for him) by sitting on their story on illegal NSA mass surveillance and data collection programs for 8 months until the election was over.

I expect the editorial commentary to be deafeningly silent or over the top hypocritical.

[Edited on 12/16/2015 by axeman]

It's going to be fun reading the NY Times coverage about a cover up of information or great public interest that could have changed the outcome of an election. Cringe!

Well, there should be an investigation. BTW, Muleman, I don't think I'd call Emanuel "Obama's boy". He is far from that.

My point here was the fact that the NY Times greatly aided Bush's second-term campaign (and probably saved it for him) by sitting on their story on illegal NSA mass surveillance and data collection programs for 8 months until the election was over.

I expect the editorial commentary to be deafeningly silent or over the top hypocritical.

[Edited on 12/16/2015 by axeman]

'
________________________________________________________________________

Not that it has anything to do with Rahm Emanuel's failure to keep the citizens of Chicago safe but Pres. Bush had the legal authority for what you misrepresent as the "NSA mass surveillance and data collection program".

That authority was given when both the democrats and republicans voted for and passed the Patriot Act.

Obama, in his usual political rhetoric railed against the Patriot Act as a candidate but as soon as he was in office approved expanding and strengthening it.

So much for your rhetoric.

More on point, why is it you liberals just don't care how many black people are killed?

Name one "liberal" who has said that...... just another made up lie for you to keep repeating.........

Name one "liberal" who has said that...... just another made up lie for you to keep repeating.........

It is amazing. After bragging about the huge victory by the Republicans last November, nothing getting done is still the Democrats fault.

For all the liberals whining about “gun control” not one offers a draft of legislation, calls for increased law enforcement or fixing the broken gun purchase background check system.

The calls for “gun-control” from the left are nothing more than empty words that accomplish nothing.

Why?

What's wrong Mule? I'd think you have plenty of fire power to shoot up a Planned Parenthood office. You sure are a cry baby terrorist.

What's wrong Mule? I'd think you have plenty of fire power to shoot up a Planned Parenthood office. You sure are a cry baby terrorist.

________________________________________________________________________

I didn't think you had the balls to answer the question.

Just another liberal with nothing.

I've posted several solutions that I believe will work Muleboy. I'm sorry your tiny brain can't comprehend what is written.

Do you really think anyone on this forum takes you seriously? You constantly lie, never back up your claims with links, then whine that folks won't do your research for you.

You are empty. Nothing but hate, lies, and darkness.

I've posted several solutions that I believe will work Muleboy. I'm sorry your tiny brain can't comprehend what is written.

Do you really think anyone on this forum takes you seriously? You constantly lie, never back up your claims with links, then whine that folks won't do your research for you.

You are empty. Nothing but hate, lies, and darkness.

_______________________________________________________________________

little billy the liar is at it again.
You have never posted a draft of legislation, calls for increased law enforcement or fixing the broken gun purchase background check system.

Never and neither has any of your liberal buddies.

Nothing there.

For all the liberals whining about “gun control” not one offers a draft of legislation, calls for increased law enforcement or fixing the broken gun purchase background check system.

The calls for “gun-control” from the left are nothing more than empty words that accomplish nothing.

Why?

How stupid and uninformed are you, really. 😛 http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/senate-gop-votes-terrorist-gun-bill-article-1.2454448

_________________________________________________________________________

pops you really are an idiot.

Did you read the actual bills? No? I didn’t think so.

The bills drafted by democrats would have made it easy for the government to take away the ability for law-abiding Americans to defend themselves against gun-wielding criminals.

The second bill would tie the gun purchase background check to the so-called terrorist watch list which has been proven to be incomplete, inaccurate and a joke.

Sen. Feinstein tried in 2007 to get the terrorists banned from purchasing guns in the U.S. Harry Reid killed the bill in the democrat controlled Senate.

Not that it has anything to do with Rahm Emanuel's failure to keep the citizens of Chicago safe but Pres. Bush had the legal authority for what you misrepresent as the "NSA mass surveillance and data collection program".

That authority was given when both the democrats and republicans voted for and passed the Patriot Act.

Obama, in his usual political rhetoric railed against the Patriot Act as a candidate but as soon as he was in office approved expanding and strengthening it.

So much for your rhetoric.

More on point, why is it you liberals just don't care how many black people are killed?

Never sure whether you are that twisted or are just trolling whenever you post Mule.
Really shouldn't respond but:
https://theintercept.com/2015/05/07/appellate-court-rules-nsas-bulk-collection-phone-records-illegal/

He is both...............

HTW Residents Want Muleboy Gone - no one ever gets what they want it seems. Obama's fault of course for not personally checking out each internet user. Bush would have banned him by now.

HTW Residents Want Muleboy Gone - no one ever gets what they want it seems. Obama's fault of course for not personally checking out each internet user. Bush would have banned him by now.

You aren't very far off the point. There are those on HTW, particularly in the WP, that want to drive off everyone who doesn't agree with them in general. Then there are those who would whittle down that even more to just the ones that agree with them in all particulars.

Some folks just don't want to let others express their opinion, and try to belittle and abuse those who do.

You aren't very far off the point. There are those on HTW, particularly in the WP, that want to drive off everyone who doesn't agree with them in general.

I've been posting on the WP for over ten years now and I've never once thought anyone should be "driven off" for simply disagreeing.

As far as insults and such go, people tend to classify insult severity according to their own personal biases (in this case, usually political) to begin with.

You aren't very far off the point. There are those on HTW, particularly in the WP, that want to drive off everyone who doesn't agree with them in general.

I've been posting on the WP for over ten years now and I've never once thought anyone should be "driven off" for simply disagreeing.

As far as insults and such go, people tend to classify insult severity according to their own personal biases (in this case, usually political) to begin with.

I can't really recall you having an actual problem with anyone, but I'm sure you know of those I'm talking about.

You aren't very far off the point. There are those on HTW, particularly in the WP, that want to drive off everyone who doesn't agree with them in general.

I've been posting on the WP for over ten years now and I've never once thought anyone should be "driven off" for simply disagreeing.

As far as insults and such go, people tend to classify insult severity according to their own personal biases (in this case, usually political) to begin with.

I can't really recall you having an actual problem with anyone, but I'm sure you know of those I'm talking about.

Well, sure, but a lot of times the insults are intertwined with the disagreements. 😛

You aren't very far off the point. There are those on HTW, particularly in the WP, that want to drive off everyone who doesn't agree with them in general.

I've been posting on the WP for over ten years now and I've never once thought anyone should be "driven off" for simply disagreeing.

As far as insults and such go, people tend to classify insult severity according to their own personal biases (in this case, usually political) to begin with.

I can't really recall you having an actual problem with anyone, but I'm sure you know of those I'm talking about.

Well, sure, but a lot of times the insults are intertwined with the disagreements. 😛

I've seen some where the second post in a thread contained some rather unneeded comments on the poster,
the posters' intelligence, and racial comments, just because of who posted it. Didn't matter where the content came from or what it was about.

You aren't very far off the point. There are those on HTW, particularly in the WP, that want to drive off everyone who doesn't agree with them in general.

I've been posting on the WP for over ten years now and I've never once thought anyone should be "driven off" for simply disagreeing.

As far as insults and such go, people tend to classify insult severity according to their own personal biases (in this case, usually political) to begin with.

I can't really recall you having an actual problem with anyone, but I'm sure you know of those I'm talking about.

Well, sure, but a lot of times the insults are intertwined with the disagreements. 😛

Hey I have had plenty of problems with him. Like how long we should celebrate Stanley Cup Victories. Not to mention his love of rap. He won't let me by his hype man which pisses me off as I say "What" as good as any hyper in rap. Throw in my boxers up to my underarms and my pants around my knees, how can I not get the job?

Jerry - there are those that have opinions and then there are trolls that just fight without any actual substance. Going on and on like a broken record. Muleman is one of those.

Personally I think the WP helped to really hurt this forum along with the troll invasion that drove away many originals. Why people go to a band's forum to discuss/argue politics is beyond me. Especially those that never chat about the band, music or an positive subject at all. You can search back hundreds of posts and Muleman is all WP and hate. Not sure he is even an ABB fan. No evidence of it anyway.

Those here for a long time know how great a community it was. Shame.

Since I live here in Chicago and see this stuff (bad and good), it kind of irritates me when someone points jabs at my town, especially if the individual doesn't have a point of reference and won't answer as to whether he lives here or has even been here.

Let's talk hockey instead! 😛