Don't click or your IP will be banned


Hittin' The Web with the Allman Brothers Band Forum
You are not logged in

< Last Thread   Next Thread >Ascending sortDescending sorting  
Author: Subject: Dad chases nude boy from daughter's room with pipe

True Peach





Posts: 10984
(11120 all sites)
Registered: 5/24/2002
Status: Offline

  posted on 9/12/2008 at 05:08 PM
Reminds me of my teen years

DELTONA, Fla. (AP) - An angry Deltona father whacked his teenage daughter's boyfriend with a metal pipe after finding the boy naked in his daughter's room. Authorities say the father, 45, didn't even know his daughter had a boyfriend or that the youngster had been sneaking into the home for more than a year.

When he heard noises coming from his daughter's bedroom Thursday morning and saw a stranger standing naked on the girl's bed, he swung a metal pipe. He then chased the teen out the front door and called police.

The boy was taken to the hospital where doctors closed a head wound with staples.

The father was charged with aggravated battery on a child and bonded out on $10,000.

 

____________________

 
Visit User's Homepage
Replies:

Zen Peach



Karma:
Posts: 27533
(27822 all sites)
Registered: 2/18/2006
Status: Offline

  posted on 9/12/2008 at 05:25 PM
I don't see a reason for the father being charged for what he thought was protection of his daughter. If they pursue the charges, depending on the age of the boy, the father should threaten the guy with statutory rape charges. I think it should be called a draw.

And then there should be a serious discussion with the daughter.

 

____________________
Sometimes we can't choose the music life gives us - but we damn sure can choose how we dance!


 

Zen Peach



Karma:
Posts: 23381
(23380 all sites)
Registered: 12/27/2005
Status: Offline

  posted on 9/12/2008 at 06:58 PM
Wow, I just had a flashback!

 

____________________
Quit!

 

True Peach



Karma:
Posts: 11437
(11442 all sites)
Registered: 8/21/2006
Status: Offline

  posted on 9/12/2008 at 07:41 PM
quote:
I don't see a reason for the father being charged for what he thought was protection of his daughter. If they pursue the charges, depending on the age of the boy, the father should threaten the guy with statutory rape charges. I think it should be called a draw.

And then there should be a serious discussion with the daughter.


If the dad wanted to protect the daughter from boys, maybe he should have gone upside her head with the pipe so she'd resist all boys, not just this one. Of course that's just as wrong as what the dad did here, but you see my point. No ages are mentioned, so it may be safe to assume the kids were around the same ages. There is no legal reason to distinguish the sexes here from the facts given.

 

____________________

 

World Class Peach



Karma:
Posts: 5451
(5450 all sites)
Registered: 4/18/2002
Status: Offline

  posted on 9/12/2008 at 08:49 PM
The kid got off easy. Under the "Castle Law", the father would have had justifiable reason to use deadly force.
Think this: You hear suspicious noises coming from your pre/teenage daughter's room (the article did say aggravated battery on a child), as you enter the room you see a naked male on her bed. What would your response be?
Would you:
1) Ask "Honey, what's going on?"
2) Say "Hi, (insert name). How you doing? Can I ask why you're in my daughter's room, naked, and on her bed?"
3) Would you assume from what you saw that she was being sexually assaulted, and as her dad you try to protect her as best you can?

The kid's lucky he ain't dead.

 

____________________
All photos posted of family, friends, and places, including those of historic ABB value, by this poster are copyrighted by the poster, or posted by permission of the copywriter.
None of those photos may be reproduced for commercial gain.

 

Zen Peach



Karma:
Posts: 25190
(25220 all sites)
Registered: 1/5/2002
Status: Offline

  posted on 9/12/2008 at 09:11 PM
Sumbitch got off lucky

 

____________________

 

True Peach



Karma:
Posts: 11437
(11442 all sites)
Registered: 8/21/2006
Status: Offline

  posted on 9/12/2008 at 09:14 PM
quote:
The kid got off easy. Under the "Castle Law", the father would have had justifiable reason to use deadly force.
Think this: You hear suspicious noises coming from your pre/teenage daughter's room (the article did say aggravated battery on a child), as you enter the room you see a naked male on her bed. What would your response be?
Would you:
1) Ask "Honey, what's going on?"
2) Say "Hi, (insert name). How you doing? Can I ask why you're in my daughter's room, naked, and on her bed?"
3) Would you assume from what you saw that she was being sexually assaulted, and as her dad you try to protect her as best you can?

The kid's lucky he ain't dead.


And yet the police, who have superior knowledge of the facts and Florida law, chose to charge the dad.

 

____________________

 

World Class Peach



Karma:
Posts: 5451
(5450 all sites)
Registered: 4/18/2002
Status: Offline

  posted on 9/12/2008 at 09:20 PM
quote:
quote:
The kid got off easy. Under the "Castle Law", the father would have had justifiable reason to use deadly force.
Think this: You hear suspicious noises coming from your pre/teenage daughter's room (the article did say aggravated battery on a child), as you enter the room you see a naked male on her bed. What would your response be?
Would you:
1) Ask "Honey, what's going on?"
2) Say "Hi, (insert name). How you doing? Can I ask why you're in my daughter's room, naked, and on her bed?"
3) Would you assume from what you saw that she was being sexually assaulted, and as her dad you try to protect her as best you can?

The kid's lucky he ain't dead.


And yet the police, who have superior knowledge of the facts and Florida law, chose to charge the dad.


Brock, what would you do in that situation?

 

____________________
All photos posted of family, friends, and places, including those of historic ABB value, by this poster are copyrighted by the poster, or posted by permission of the copywriter.
None of those photos may be reproduced for commercial gain.

 

True Peach



Karma:
Posts: 11437
(11442 all sites)
Registered: 8/21/2006
Status: Offline

  posted on 9/12/2008 at 09:33 PM
quote:
quote:
quote:
The kid got off easy. Under the "Castle Law", the father would have had justifiable reason to use deadly force.
Think this: You hear suspicious noises coming from your pre/teenage daughter's room (the article did say aggravated battery on a child), as you enter the room you see a naked male on her bed. What would your response be?
Would you:
1) Ask "Honey, what's going on?"
2) Say "Hi, (insert name). How you doing? Can I ask why you're in my daughter's room, naked, and on her bed?"
3) Would you assume from what you saw that she was being sexually assaulted, and as her dad you try to protect her as best you can?

The kid's lucky he ain't dead.


And yet the police, who have superior knowledge of the facts and Florida law, chose to charge the dad.


Brock, what would you do in that situation?


The article does not provide enough facts to really know what was going on, though if the girl was being attacked she would have likely screamed for help. I would assume the police would have been somewhat in your camp to begin with, yet they must have decided to charge the dad after assessing what occurred. But to answer your question, I would not use deadly force if something less would end the threat.

[Edited on 9/13/2008 by Brock]

 

____________________

 

Zen Peach



Karma:
Posts: 15832
(15866 all sites)
Registered: 8/9/2002
Status: Offline

  posted on 9/12/2008 at 09:50 PM
Apparently the daughter invited the boy into her home, and her room. They probably weren't doing anything the father didn't do at their age.

Busting a kid in the head with a pipe for being naked with one's daughter might sound cool to some folks, but I think the police made the right decision.

 

____________________


 

Zen Peach



Karma:
Posts: 27533
(27822 all sites)
Registered: 2/18/2006
Status: Offline

  posted on 9/12/2008 at 10:10 PM
Perhaps the telling fact here is the father called the police. If I thought it was some kid with my kid I wouldn't have called the law. I think the situation might have been second guessed and that's why the father was charged....odds are, unless he pleads to a lesser charge, he won't be convicted. If I saw a naked person standing over my daughter, I'd probably swing first and ask questions later.

 

____________________
Sometimes we can't choose the music life gives us - but we damn sure can choose how we dance!


 

True Peach



Karma:
Posts: 10984
(11120 all sites)
Registered: 5/24/2002
Status: Offline

  posted on 9/12/2008 at 10:37 PM
quote:
Apparently the daughter invited the boy into her home, and her room. They probably weren't doing anything the father didn't do at their age.

Busting a kid in the head with a pipe for being naked with one's daughter might sound cool to some folks, but I think the police made the right decision.


No mention of actual age, and this had been going on for a year.

I'd say Daughter would be as guilty as the boyfriend.

I would have given them both Barium Enemas, and then made them stand in time out.

[Edited on 9/13/2008 by OldDirtRoad]

 

____________________

 

True Peach



Karma:
Posts: 13728
(13982 all sites)
Registered: 2/10/2005
Status: Offline

  posted on 9/13/2008 at 05:31 AM
the father blew it, big time. He acted like the jealous boyfriend and not an intelligent, caring parent. He's an idiot.
 

Ultimate Peach



Karma:
Posts: 3636
(3636 all sites)
Registered: 5/1/2002
Status: Offline

  posted on 9/13/2008 at 06:03 AM
The father got righteously indignant - you can hear him thinking - no piece of sh-t is coming in MY house, screwing MY daughter, hit him with the pipe and then called police to have the KID arrested, not turn himself in. He's in trouble and he should be. There was no need to hit the kid, I'm sure he would have bolted on his own if given the chance.

The fact that there's a $10,000 bond tells me something too. The police take the charges seriously and this guy is likely not a fine upstanding member of the community.

I have two teen daughters, and sons 12 and 9. I'd run the kid off, but the real discussions would take place with them, the girls and the boys.

[Edited on 9/13/2008 by Gregallmanfan]

 

____________________
Walk down on the street and leave, my blues at home

 

Maximum Peach



Karma:
Posts: 8643
(8641 all sites)
Registered: 12/14/2004
Status: Offline

  posted on 9/13/2008 at 12:09 PM
The police did the right thing, but if this ever went in front of a jury, they wouldn't convict.

People like this guy are heroes to alot of folks.

 
 


Powered by XForum 1.81.1 by Trollix Software

Privacy | Terms of Service | Report Infringement | Personal Data Management | Contact Us
The ALLMAN BROTHERS BAND name, The ALLMAN BROTHERS name, likenesses, logos, mushroom design and peach truck are all registered trademarks of THE ABB MERCHANDISING CO., INC. whose rights are specifically reserved. Any artwork, visual, or audio representations used on this web site CONTAINING ANY REGISTERED TRADEMARKS are under license from The ABB MERCHANDISING CO., INC. A REVOCABLE, GRATIS LICENSE IS GRANTED TO ALL REGISTERED PEACH CORP MEMBERS FOR The DOWNLOADING OF ONE COPY FOR PERSONAL USE ONLY. ANY DISTRIBUTION OR REPRODUCTION OF THE TRADEMARKS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE PROHIBITED AND ARE SPECIFICALLY RESERVED BY THE ABB MERCHANDISING CO.,INC.
site by Hittin' the Web Group with www.experiencewasabi3d.com