Don't click or your IP will be banned


Hittin' The Web with the Allman Brothers Band Forum
You are not logged in

< Last Thread   Next Thread ><<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>Ascending sortDescending sorting  
Author: Subject: 2 New Cavaugnauh Witnesses step forward with boxes of evidence

Maximum Peach



Karma:
Posts: 9766
(9765 all sites)
Registered: 8/16/2005
Status: Offline

  posted on 10/3/2018 at 04:32 PM
quote:
quote:
quote:
Today’s breaking news is that Brent Kavanaugh drank beer in high school and was seen throwing ice.

Democrats are losing their minds!

Brent Kavanaugh is a normal American and will be the next Supreme Court Justice.





Who perjured himself several times during the hearing. Said the legal drinking age was 18 when it was 21, among other things. Seems like I remember Republicans disqualifying people for purjery in the past. But I guess Kavanaugh is the last conservative on the planet and they are desperate to get him on the court.



"Said the legal drinking age was 18 when it was 21"

During the time in question the legal beer drinking age was 18.
Kavanaugh told the truth.
You told a lie.

Wrong again.

 

Universal Peach



Karma:
Posts: 6570
(6570 all sites)
Registered: 7/18/2010
Status: Offline

  posted on 10/3/2018 at 04:32 PM
quote:
During the time in question the legal beer drinking age was 18.
Kavanaugh told the truth.
You told a lie.


Wrong.

https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5baea717e4b027da00d33d5f

 

Universal Peach



Karma:
Posts: 6127
(6136 all sites)
Registered: 6/1/2009
Status: Offline

  posted on 10/3/2018 at 04:34 PM
The FBI report is done and submitted.

Senator not-so-Feinstein, having not read it yet, has already gone running to the media to tell them she doesn't like the report.

The Democrats got exactly what they demanded.
Now they will all say it is not enough.

This has been a political attack from the beginning and will never stop.

The Democrats falsely claim that it is the Republicans who are not treating Ford respectfully but it was Senator Feinstein that leaked the letter Ford wanted kept in confidence to the Washington Post.


 

Universal Peach



Karma:
Posts: 6570
(6570 all sites)
Registered: 7/18/2010
Status: Offline

  posted on 10/3/2018 at 04:39 PM
You're still wrong about the drinking age.
 

Universal Peach



Karma:
Posts: 6127
(6136 all sites)
Registered: 6/1/2009
Status: Offline

  posted on 10/3/2018 at 04:50 PM
quote:
You're still wrong about the drinking age.


Again you are wrong.
Looking up the beer drinking age in Maryland in the year in question is easy.

 

Universal Peach



Karma:
Posts: 6570
(6570 all sites)
Registered: 7/18/2010
Status: Offline

  posted on 10/3/2018 at 05:02 PM
quote:
Again you are wrong.
Looking up the beer drinking age in Maryland in the year in question is easy.


Wrong again. I did look it up, and yes it was easy. The following is from the link I posted, which you didn't read:


". . .it certainly wasn’t legal for Kavanaugh, who lived in Maryland. In the summer of 1982, seven months before he turned 18, the state raised the legal drinking age for beer and wine from 18 to 21. (It was already 21 for hard liquor.)

Those who were 18 or older at the time were “grandfathered” in, so they could continue to drink legally. That, however, did not apply to Kavanaugh: He didn’t turn 18 until the following February. "

 

Universal Peach



Karma:
Posts: 6127
(6136 all sites)
Registered: 6/1/2009
Status: Offline

  posted on 10/3/2018 at 05:50 PM
quote:
quote:
Again you are wrong.
Looking up the beer drinking age in Maryland in the year in question is easy.


Wrong again. I did look it up, and yes it was easy. The following is from the link I posted, which you didn't read:


". . .it certainly wasn’t legal for Kavanaugh, who lived in Maryland. In the summer of 1982, seven months before he turned 18, the state raised the legal drinking age for beer and wine from 18 to 21. (It was already 21 for hard liquor.)

Those who were 18 or older at the time were “grandfathered” in, so they could continue to drink legally. That, however, did not apply to Kavanaugh: He didn’t turn 18 until the following February. "



Dismissed: No source

Which corrupt liberal media rag did you copy that from?

 

Peach Extraordinaire



Karma:
Posts: 4387
(4398 all sites)
Registered: 12/18/2004
Status: Offline

  posted on 10/3/2018 at 05:50 PM
quote:
quote:
Again you are wrong.
Looking up the beer drinking age in Maryland in the year in question is easy.


Wrong again. I did look it up, and yes it was easy. The following is from the link I posted, which you didn't read:


". . .it certainly wasn’t legal for Kavanaugh, who lived in Maryland. In the summer of 1982, seven months before he turned 18, the state raised the legal drinking age for beer and wine from 18 to 21. (It was already 21 for hard liquor.)

Those who were 18 or older at the time were “grandfathered” in, so they could continue to drink legally. That, however, did not apply to Kavanaugh: He didn’t turn 18 until the following February. "


Don't waste your time. mule doesn't give a damn about the truth or finding out facts. The legal drinking age isn't in dispute where it matters. mule can lie and invent stuff all he wants to but it doesn't mean or change anything. In other words, don't feed the troll.

 

Universal Peach



Karma:
Posts: 6127
(6136 all sites)
Registered: 6/1/2009
Status: Offline

  posted on 10/3/2018 at 06:08 PM
quote:
quote:
quote:
Again you are wrong.
Looking up the beer drinking age in Maryland in the year in question is easy.


Wrong again. I did look it up, and yes it was easy. The following is from the link I posted, which you didn't read:


". . .it certainly wasn’t legal for Kavanaugh, who lived in Maryland. In the summer of 1982, seven months before he turned 18, the state raised the legal drinking age for beer and wine from 18 to 21. (It was already 21 for hard liquor.)

Those who were 18 or older at the time were “grandfathered” in, so they could continue to drink legally. That, however, did not apply to Kavanaugh: He didn’t turn 18 until the following February. "


Don't waste your time. mule doesn't give a damn about the truth or finding out facts. The legal drinking age isn't in dispute where it matters. mule can lie and invent stuff all he wants to but it doesn't mean or change anything. In other words, don't feed the troll.



How would you know?
You have proven repeatedly that you are unable to source any factual information.

rabbit posted a false statement.

 

Universal Peach



Karma:
Posts: 6127
(6136 all sites)
Registered: 6/1/2009
Status: Offline

  posted on 10/3/2018 at 06:08 PM
Caught intentionally trying to spin the Kavanaugh story, NYT forced to admit its bias:

New York Times says it erred by assigning opinion writer to Kavanaugh story
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/10/02/new-york-times-mistake-opinion-wr iter-kavanaugh-862638


 

Universal Peach



Karma:
Posts: 6127
(6136 all sites)
Registered: 6/1/2009
Status: Offline

  posted on 10/3/2018 at 06:52 PM
Democratic staffer arrested in doxxing of GOP senators during Kavanaugh hearing

www.foxnews.com

A Democratic congressional staffer was arrested Wednesday and accused of posting the personal information of at least one Republican senator during last week's hearing about sexual assault claims against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, authorities said.

U.S. Capitol Police said 27-year-old Jackson Cosko was charged with making public restricted personal information, witness tampering, threats in interstate communication, unauthorized access of a government computer, identity theft, second-degree burglary and unlawful entry. Police added that the investigation was continuing and more charges could be filed.

Senior congressional sources tell Fox News that Cosko most recently worked as a staffer for Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas. He also had worked with Sen. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., and former Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer of California. A LinkedIn page with Cosko's name on it describes him as a "Democratic Political Professional & Cybersecurity Graduate Student."

Personal information of Sens. Lindsey Graham, Mike Lee and Orrin Hatch was posted on their respective Wikipedia pages as the Senate Judiciary Committee questioned Kavanaugh over allegations that he assaulted Christine Blasey Ford at a high school party in the early 1980s. All three have professed their belief that Kavanaugh is innocent of the claims brought against him by Ford, with Graham telling the federal judge "you've got nothing to apologize for" amid a fiery rant denouncing Democrats' handling of the claims.

The intentional publication of the information was first caught by a Twitter bot that automatically tracks any changes made to Wikipedia entries from anyone located in the U.S. Congress and publicizes them on the social media site. The bot account later deleted the tweets because the edits contained personal information. According to the bot, whoever posted the information did so from a computer in the House of Representatives.

The home addresses of the senators appeared to be correct, thought the phone numbers didn't appear to be entirely accurate. A “home” phone number listed for Graham appeared to direct callers to the Sexual Minority Youth Assistance League (SMYAL), a Washington D.C.-based advocacy group.
Fox News' Chad Pergram and Lukas Mikelionis contributed to this report.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democratic-staffer-arrested-in-doxxing-of- gop-senators-during-kavanaugh-hearing




 

Universal Peach



Karma:
Posts: 6127
(6136 all sites)
Registered: 6/1/2009
Status: Offline

  posted on 10/3/2018 at 09:35 PM
"buys, possesses, keeps or transports"

Says nothing about consuming.

 

Universal Peach



Karma:
Posts: 6127
(6136 all sites)
Registered: 6/1/2009
Status: Offline

  posted on 10/3/2018 at 09:36 PM
Democratic staffer charged with posting senators’ private info
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/10/03/gop-senators-doxxing-arrest-86812 2


Democratic staffer arrested for 'doxing' of senators
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/us-capitol-police-arrest-suspect-be hind-doxing-of-at-least-one-senator


 

Peach Extraordinaire



Karma:
Posts: 4387
(4398 all sites)
Registered: 12/18/2004
Status: Offline

  posted on 10/3/2018 at 09:39 PM
quote:
Democratic staffer charged with posting senators’ private info
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/10/03/gop-senators-doxxing-arrest-86812 2


Democratic staffer arrested for 'doxing' of senators
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/us-capitol-police-arrest-suspect-be hind-doxing-of-at-least-one-senator




What does this have to do with the sexual predator Kavanugh? Stay on topic, junior.

 

Universal Peach



Karma:
Posts: 6570
(6570 all sites)
Registered: 7/18/2010
Status: Offline

  posted on 10/3/2018 at 09:39 PM
quote:
Dismissed: No source

Which corrupt liberal media rag did you copy that from?


Awwww.... golly gee whiz, The Beaver wants to play hardball with Wally and the big boys. OK, a fair challenge for due diligence, just don't cry when the ball hits you, Beav:

https://msa.maryland.gov/megafile/msa/speccol/sc2900/sc2908/000001/000742/h tml/am742--1224.html
(you will find a "next" page click upper right if you want to wade into the deep end, it's boring as hell)

This is a link to the Maryland State Archives documenting the Maryland House of Delegates vote on February 25, 1982 raising the minimum legal drinking age to 21, with an exception for those who were 18 on July 1, 1982 (grandfather exemption for those born before July 1, 1964), when the law went into effect. Kavanaugh was born on February 12, 1965, and so was not exempt.

Here is a short snippet with pertinent language, from Session Laws 1982, Volume 742, Chapter 96, Page 1224, entire text at above link:

LAWS OF MARYLAND
Ch. 96

Alcoholic Beverages - Legal Age Altered
(Dual System Retained)
FOR the purpose of altering the age at which persons are
legally permitted to purchase, possess, or consume
certain alcoholic beverages, or remain in certain
business establishments or on certain premises;
changing the age of persons to whom alcoholic beverages
may be legally sold or given; making certain technical
changes and corrections to the language and style of
expression of certain provisions of the Code; altering
certain penalties; generally relating to changing the
age at which persons are legally permitted to perform
and engage in certain acts concerning certain alcoholic
beverages; and clarifying language.
BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments,
Article 2B - Alcoholic Beverages
Section 2(t); 3(a)(1), (2)(iii) and (iv); 20(j-l);
21(f-l) and (h); 29(1); 38(a)(2), (3), and (4);
69(d-l) and (e); 92(h); 117(a) and (b)(1);
118(a), (a-1), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g),
(h), (m), (n), (o), and (q); 120(a) and (b);
121(b); 123(b); 125; 126A(a); 126B; 128A; 128B;
130(a) and (b); 158(f)(2); 181; 181A; 182; 183;
and 196(b)
Annotated Code of Maryland
(1981 Replacement Volume and 1981 Supplement)
BY repealing and reenacting, without amendments,
Article 2B - Alcoholic Beverages
Section 117(a)
Annotated Code of Maryland
(1981 Replacement Volume and 1981 Supplement)
BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments,
Article 27 - Crimes and Punishments
Section 400; 400A; 401; 403; and 406A
Annotated Code of Maryland
(1976 Replacement Volume and 1981 Supplement)
SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF
MARYLAND, That section(s) of the Annotated Code of Maryland
read(s) as follows:
Article 2B - Alcoholic Beverages
2. (page 1225)
For the purposes of this article and unless otherwise
required by the context:
(t) (1) "Consumer" means any natural person [over the
age of twenty-one (21)] 21 years OLD OR OLDER [or in the
case of beer and light wine any person over the age of
eighteen (18) years] or any corporation not otherwise
interdicted by this article or any other law of this State,
who buys, possesses, keeps or transports alcoholic beverages
upon which the taxes provided by the tax provisions of this
article have been paid, for his own use and not for sale.
(2) (caps in original archived text) IN THE CASE OF BEER AND LIGHT WINE,
"CONSUMER" INCLUDES ANY NATURAL PERSON OVER THE AGE OF 21
YEARS, AND ANY NATURAL PERSON UNDER 21 YEARS OF AGE WHO WAS
BORN BEFORE JULY 1, 1964, AND ANY CORPORATION NOT OTHERWISE
INTERDICTED BY THIS ARTICLE OR ANY OTHER LAW OF THIS STATE,
WHO BUYS, POSSESSES, KEEPS OR TRANSPORTS BEER OR LIGHT WINE
UPON WHICH THE TAXES PROVIDED BY THE TAX PROVISIONS OF THIS
ARTICLE HAVE BEEN PAID, FOR HIS OWN USE AND NOT FOR SALE.
3.
(a) (1) Alcoholic Beverages Generally. No alcoholic
beverages shall be bought, possessed, stored, imported,
transported, kept or suffered to be bought, possessed,
stored, imported, transported or kept in any vehicle, vessel
or aircraft or on any premises or under his charge or
control by any person except: (i) by a consumer or, (ii) by
a licensee as provided in this article or, (iii) by a person
under [twenty-one] 21 years of age who may have in his
possession or transport alcoholic beverages for any lawful
purpose with the knowledge and consent of his parent or
guardian or incident to the lawful employment of the person
as provided for in this article. However, this exception
shall not be construed to permit a person under the age of
[twenty-one] 21 to buy or consume alcoholic beverages,
(except beer and light wine FOR A PERSON DESIGNATED UNDER §
2(T)(2) OF THIS ARTICLE) nor to possess, store, import,
transport or keep alcoholic beverages (except beer and light
wine FOR A PERSON DESIGNATED UNDER § 2(T)(2) OF THIS
ARTICLE) for his own use, nor to buy, possess, store,
import, transport or keep alcoholic beverages (except beer
and light wine FOR A PERSON DESIGNATED UNDER § 2(T)(2) OF
THIS ARTICLE) for any purpose in any county or Baltimore
City where otherwise prohibited by this article or any other
law of this State.


It is all there, kinda dry though, that clip was just the intro. Here is a more fun click, a Gettysburg Times article from February 26, 1982, the day after the House of Delegates voted to raise the minimum drinking age to 21, 116-18 in favor of the measure. (Interesting adjacent bit on Ed Asner and El Salvador), there is also a mention of the exception for those who were 18 on July 1, 1982.

The quote from Isaiah Dixon Jr. D-Baltimore was quite entertaining, he jumped from his seat and proclaimed, "I think this marks the end of an era where young whippersnappers took advantage of their parents, their relatives, their friends, their peers." Apparently he was unaware of Kavanaugh and his buddies' antics.

https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=DplcAAAAIBAJ&sjid=RVgNAAAAIBAJ&am p;pg=4613%2C5145398

 

Universal Peach



Karma:
Posts: 6570
(6570 all sites)
Registered: 7/18/2010
Status: Offline

  posted on 10/3/2018 at 09:42 PM
quote:
"buys, possesses, keeps or transports"

Says nothing about consuming.



First line, helps if you actually read it:


"FOR the purpose of altering the age at which persons are
legally permitted to purchase, possess, or consume
certain alcoholic beverages . . ."


Weak, even for you. Usually when laws are passed on the drinking age, it has something to do with , well … drinking.

If you are consuming, then you are in possession. Go home Beaver.


[Edited on 10/4/2018 by BrerRabbit]

 

Peach Extraordinaire



Karma:
Posts: 4628
(4623 all sites)
Registered: 12/27/2003
Status: Offline

  posted on 10/4/2018 at 04:22 PM
Interesting: It took less than one week for America’s perception of the FBI to reverse. Now, Trump and the right are praising the FBI for their fair and great work, while the left now calls the investigation a sham. The emotionally disturbed finger-pointers on both sides of the aisle are dragging the country down with them.
 

Ultimate Peach



Karma:
Posts: 3777
(3783 all sites)
Registered: 10/5/2004
Status: Offline

  posted on 10/4/2018 at 04:32 PM
quote:
Interesting: It took less than one week for America’s perception of the FBI to reverse. Now, Trump and the right are praising the FBI for their fair and great work, while the left now calls the investigation a sham. The emotionally disturbed finger-pointers on both sides of the aisle are dragging the country down with them.


I don't know about sham, but maybe incomplete. One of the key issues is what were the directives. It is hard to take anything Trump says as the truth as to what he limited. On the face of it, if the the two who testified before the Senate were among those who were not interviewed, it would seem less than thorough and more aimed at fulfilling a goal by Trump & the GOP to give cover & perception of due diligence. Throw in any those who claim to have called the FBI with info yet not interviewed & others not interviewed, and it would indicate a purposely narrowed investigation. Is this good enough for the American people?

 

Peach Extraordinaire



Karma:
Posts: 4628
(4623 all sites)
Registered: 12/27/2003
Status: Offline

  posted on 10/4/2018 at 04:57 PM
Definitely not good enough in my eyes. Yelling, sobbing, and dodging questions would eliminate any of us here if we did that at a job interview, but somehow it’s ok during an interview for the Supreme Court. Unreal.

My point is that the left shouldn’t criticize the FBI simply because the results don’t go their way. Otherwise they are doing the same thing as the right is doing to Mueller. I just want them to succeed in delivering their message, but too many prominent voices on the left resort to the same hostility the right displays. It’s simply a recipe for losing unfortunately. The only way to win is to demonstrate everyday that the left won’t resort to that. But they do, and only create ammunition for the other side. Without such ammunition, the right would have absolutely nothing. The only leg the right can stand on is the mistakes made by the left.

 

Ultimate Peach



Karma:
Posts: 3777
(3783 all sites)
Registered: 10/5/2004
Status: Offline

  posted on 10/4/2018 at 05:46 PM
quote:
Definitely not good enough in my eyes. Yelling, sobbing, and dodging questions would eliminate any of us here if we did that at a job interview, but somehow it’s ok during an interview for the Supreme Court. Unreal.

My point is that the left shouldn’t criticize the FBI simply because the results don’t go their way. Otherwise they are doing the same thing as the right is doing to Mueller. I just want them to succeed in delivering their message, but too many prominent voices on the left resort to the same hostility the right displays. It’s simply a recipe for losing unfortunately. The only way to win is to demonstrate everyday that the left won’t resort to that. But they do, and only create ammunition for the other side. Without such ammunition, the right would have absolutely nothing. The only leg the right can stand on is the mistakes made by the left.


I'm not getting the criticism of the FBI. They do as they are told. They follow Trump's directives which are most likely less than sincere and aimed not so much at fact but at giving the impression of "we did what those on the left wanted". We know Trump's agenda. He is not so complicated to figure out. He told us during the campaign what he was going to do re: the SCOTUS. This week's less than complete investigation is just another of the distractions he has to go through to get his way.

I found the below interesting:

https://www.bustle.com/p/1500-law-professors-opposing-kavanaugh-took-issue- with-this-aspect-of-his-testimony-12156392


 

Peach Extraordinaire



Karma:
Posts: 4628
(4623 all sites)
Registered: 12/27/2003
Status: Offline

  posted on 10/4/2018 at 08:39 PM
quote:
I'm not getting the criticism of the FBI. They do as they are told. They follow Trump's directives which are most likely less than sincere and aimed not so much at fact but at giving the impression of "we did what those on the left wanted"


Yes, exactly. In my roundabout post, this is what I was trying to say as well. Any slip up by the left makes it impossible for any ground to be gained, as unfortunate as that may be. I see a lot of misdirected outrage - stopping Senators in elevators preventing them from walking doesn’t help their cause.

 

Peach Master



Karma:
Posts: 582
(582 all sites)
Registered: 11/8/2008
Status: Offline

  posted on 10/4/2018 at 08:54 PM
quote:

I found the below interesting:

https://www.bustle.com/p/1500-law-professors-opposing-kavanaugh-took-issue- with-this-aspect-of-his-testimony-12156392




Yes, 1500 and growing law professors are appalled at Kavanaugh's entitlement to the position of justice. Profs from Ivy to lower tier schools are united in this travesty of appointment for a learned temperate justice. The ABA code spells out character requirements:

Rule 1.2: Promoting Confidence in the Judiciary
A judge shall act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary, and shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety.

Last week - not 36 years ago - Kav certainly didn't demonstrate integrity or propriety as he lied to the Senate Judiciary Committee.




 

Universal Peach



Karma:
Posts: 6127
(6136 all sites)
Registered: 6/1/2009
Status: Offline

  posted on 10/5/2018 at 09:41 AM
The Democrats demanded that The FBI conduct a 7th investigation of Brent Kavanaugh quickly and with limited scope, specifically 4 individuals.

The Dems said the investigation could be done in 3 days.

The FBI spent 5 days and interviewed many more people than the Democrats asked to be interviewed.

The result: There is no corroboration of the allegations made by Dr. Ford or Ms. Ramirez.


Supplemental FBI Investigation Executive Summary

Background

At the Senate Judiciary Committee’s request, the FBI opened a supplemental background investigation into Judge Kavanaugh. It’s his seventh FBI background investigation in 25 years, going back to 1993. The request was for an investigation into current credible allegations against Judge Kavanaugh.

In the course of its investigation, the FBI decided to reach out to eleven people, ten of whom agreed to be interviewed. The FBI reached out to all witnesses with potential firsthand knowledge of the allegations. The FBI provided to the Senate 12 detailed FD-302 reports summarizing their interviews with the witnesses as well as supporting materials cited by the witnesses during their interviews.

Interview Subjects

The FBI interviewed the following ten individuals:

Ford Allegations

• The three individuals identified by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford as having attended the gathering where she was allegedly assaulted. Mark Judge PJ Smyth Leland Keyser
• Mark Judge
• PJ Smyth
• Leland Keyser
• Two other individuals included on Judge Kavanaugh’s July 1, 1982 calendar entry. Timothy Gaudette Christopher Garrett
• Timothy Gaudette
• Christopher Garrett
• An attorney for one of the witnesses

Ramirez Allegations

• Deborah Ramirez
• Two alleged eyewitnesses named by Deborah Ramirez (a third alleged eyewitness refused to submit to an interview)
• Deborah Ramirez’s close friend from college

Conclusion

The Supplemental Background Investigation confirms what the Senate Judiciary Committee concluded after its investigation: there is no corroboration of the allegations made by Dr. Ford or Ms. Ramirez.


 

Universal Peach



Karma:
Posts: 6127
(6136 all sites)
Registered: 6/1/2009
Status: Offline

  posted on 10/5/2018 at 09:53 AM
Senate Judiciary Committee votes yes to send Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination to the Supreme Court to the full Senate.

 

Universal Peach



Karma:
Posts: 6570
(6570 all sites)
Registered: 7/18/2010
Status: Offline

  posted on 10/5/2018 at 10:10 AM
quote:
During the time in question the legal beer drinking age was 18.
Kavanaugh told the truth.
You told a lie


Wrong.

 
<<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>  


Powered by XForum 1.81.1 by Trollix Software

Privacy | Terms of Service | Report Infringement | Personal Data Management | Contact Us
The ALLMAN BROTHERS BAND name, The ALLMAN BROTHERS name, likenesses, logos, mushroom design and peach truck are all registered trademarks of THE ABB MERCHANDISING CO., INC. whose rights are specifically reserved. Any artwork, visual, or audio representations used on this web site CONTAINING ANY REGISTERED TRADEMARKS are under license from The ABB MERCHANDISING CO., INC. A REVOCABLE, GRATIS LICENSE IS GRANTED TO ALL REGISTERED PEACH CORP MEMBERS FOR The DOWNLOADING OF ONE COPY FOR PERSONAL USE ONLY. ANY DISTRIBUTION OR REPRODUCTION OF THE TRADEMARKS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE PROHIBITED AND ARE SPECIFICALLY RESERVED BY THE ABB MERCHANDISING CO.,INC.
site by Hittin' the Web Group with www.experiencewasabi3d.com