Thread: NY Times Expose of trump family tax fraud

PhotoRon286 - 10/2/2018 at 10:27 PM

Well well well.

Not the least bit surprised.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/10/02/us/politics/donald-trump-tax -schemes-fred-trump.html

Long read but well worth it and well documented.

No wonder he won't release his taxes and keeps insulting the paper.

Suck on that, trumpsters.


pops42 - 10/3/2018 at 08:26 PM

The trump crime family.


sckeys - 10/3/2018 at 08:55 PM

Self made. Pulled them boots on and dug in the scraps and got rich.

[Edited on 10/3/2018 by sckeys]


BrerRabbit - 10/3/2018 at 09:26 PM

They'll make you an offer of canned refuse.





Muleman1994 - 10/3/2018 at 09:53 PM

The NYT hit piece on Donald Trump is yellow journalism.

The article was not second-sourced ignoring the standard for credibility.

The business associates of Fred Trump the NYT claims to have interviewed are not named and most likely deceased. Did the NYT hire a medium to hold a sťance for he interviews?

The article is froth with opinion and generalizations, yet they loosely elude to facts that cannot be verified.

It is nothing more than fodder for those who lost the election and cannot emotionally or mentally handle the results.


pops42 - 10/3/2018 at 11:11 PM

quote:
The NYT hit piece on Donald Trump is yellow journalism.

The article was not second-sourced ignoring the standard for credibility.

The business associates of Fred Trump the NYT claims to have interviewed are not named and most likely deceased. Did the NYT hire a medium to hold a sťance for he interviews?

The article is froth with opinion and generalizations, yet they loosely elude to facts that cannot be verified.

It is nothing more than fodder for those who lost the election and cannot emotionally or mentally handle the results.

The "only" thing yellow is YOU.


Muleman1994 - 10/3/2018 at 11:51 PM

pops last hope has been dashed:

Houston City Council moves to block robot brothel opening

By JUAN A. LOZANO | Wed, October 3, 2018 03:09 EDT

HOUSTON (AP) ó Houston's City Council has changed a city ordinance in a move that would essentially stop a so-called robot brothel from opening.

A Canadian company had said it wants to open a "love dolls brothel" in Houston in which people would be able to use its human-like dolls on the premises.

But Houston's City Council on Wednesday unanimously approved a change to a city ordinance that regulates sexually-oriented businesses.

The change would ban individuals from having sex with an "anthropomorphic device," a device resembling a human being.

Houston City Council member Greg Travis said the proposed robot brothel is "not a good business for our city. We are not sin city."

The company, KinkySdollS, didn't immediately return emails seeking comment Wednesday. The company has previously opened such a business in Toronto.
___
This story has been corrected to show that the change to a city ordinance would ban individuals from having sex with an "anthropomorphic device," a device that resembles a human being, at a sexually-oriented business. It does not ban other sexual devices.


sckeys - 10/4/2018 at 01:15 AM

quote:
pops last hope has been dashed:

Houston City Council moves to block robot brothel opening

By JUAN A. LOZANO | Wed, October 3, 2018 03:09 EDT

HOUSTON (AP) ó Houston's City Council has changed a city ordinance in a move that would essentially stop a so-called robot brothel from opening.

A Canadian company had said it wants to open a "love dolls brothel" in Houston in which people would be able to use its human-like dolls on the premises.

But Houston's City Council on Wednesday unanimously approved a change to a city ordinance that regulates sexually-oriented businesses.

The change would ban individuals from having sex with an "anthropomorphic device," a device resembling a human being.

Houston City Council member Greg Travis said the proposed robot brothel is "not a good business for our city. We are not sin city."

The company, KinkySdollS, didn't immediately return emails seeking comment Wednesday. The company has previously opened such a business in Toronto.
___
This story has been corrected to show that the change to a city ordinance would ban individuals from having sex with an "anthropomorphic device," a device that resembles a human being, at a sexually-oriented business. It does not ban other sexual devices.






Do they have one for home use? Just asking.


OriginalGoober - 10/5/2018 at 01:13 AM

Before NYC Mayor Guliani the Javits center was well known as being mob controlled. So, does that make all NYC mayors before Rudy corrupt? This atmosphere and mob influence were just the price of doing business in the big apple.

Not buying this NzY Times article.


BoytonBrother - 10/5/2018 at 12:48 PM

quote:
Not buying this NzY Times article.


But I bet you bought their story about Rosentienís comments. Try not to get so emotional, and just look at things objectively for a change.


Muleman1994 - 10/5/2018 at 02:43 PM

quote:
quote:
Not buying this NzY Times article.


But I bet you bought their story about Rosentienís comments. Try not to get so emotional, and just look at things objectively for a change.



Still having difficulty staying on the topic of the thread?


sckeys - 10/5/2018 at 08:50 PM

400 million from daddy but his lie of the day was a ďsmall loanĒ of a million. Yea, self made.


Muleman1994 - 10/5/2018 at 09:23 PM

quote:
400 million from daddy but his lie of the day was a ďsmall loanĒ of a million. Yea, self made.


The NY Times lied as usual.
There is nothing in their hit piece that can be verified.

It was written purely for the far-lefties because it is what they want to hear never mind it is all bs.


Sang - 10/7/2018 at 05:19 PM

It could all be verified if certain tax returns were released..... guess we know now why they weren't .........


sckeys - 10/7/2018 at 05:23 PM

quote:
It could all be verified if certain tax returns were released..... guess we know now why they weren't .........


Exactly. When the audit is over.


MartinD28 - 10/7/2018 at 06:23 PM

quote:
quote:
It could all be verified if certain tax returns were released..... guess we know now why they weren't .........


Exactly. When the audit is over.


We really don't know if he is under audit. Just because he says so means absolutely nothing, as with the 5000 plus other lies he's told.

Even if he is under audit, there is absolutely nothing under law or code preventing him from releasing his returns other than he is holding back, doesn't want the electorate to know things, and is not transparent like many of his predecessors.

Odds are Mueller has seen the returns. Also remember that Trump's long time CFO, Allen Weisselberg has cut a deal for immunity with the US Prosecutors, and he will tell plenty to save himself.


Muleman1994 - 10/7/2018 at 06:49 PM

Donald Trumpís tax returns are confidential.

Confidentiality extends not only to the tax returns a citizen files it includes the data these returns contain, but also to all information related to those returns.

The hate groups want to go dumpster diving in their pursuit of anything they can spin negatively.
Too bad.

The far-left extremists lost the election.

They tried the Putin/Trump collusion hoax with no evidence. It did not work.

They tried the Kavanaugh is a rapist with no evidence. It did not work.

The need to learn that when they are down in a hole the first thing to do is stop digging.




Muleman1994 - 10/7/2018 at 07:21 PM

None of Donald Trumpís predecessors were as successful in their personal or professional lives.

The some just want his tax returns because they assume something nefarious.
They canít tell you what they assume, nor do they care.


BrerRabbit - 10/7/2018 at 07:25 PM

quote:
Even if he is under audit, there is absolutely nothing under law or code preventing him from releasing his returns other than he is holding back, doesn't want the electorate to know things, and is not transparent like many of his predecessors.


@martind28. Which predecessors have not been transparent?


MartinD28 - 10/7/2018 at 11:38 PM

quote:
quote:
Even if he is under audit, there is absolutely nothing under law or code preventing him from releasing his returns other than he is holding back, doesn't want the electorate to know things, and is not transparent like many of his predecessors.


@martind28. Which predecessors have not been transparent?



Back to 1976 with the exception of Trump & Gerald Ford, every major-party nominee released at least one tax return.


BrerRabbit - 10/7/2018 at 11:58 PM

Ford came and went so fast they probably just didn't get around to it.


Muleman1994 - 10/8/2018 at 12:17 AM

quote:
quote:
quote:
Even if he is under audit, there is absolutely nothing under law or code preventing him from releasing his returns other than he is holding back, doesn't want the electorate to know things, and is not transparent like many of his predecessors.


@martind28. Which predecessors have not been transparent?



Back to 1976 with the exception of Trump & Gerald Ford, every major-party nominee released at least one tax return.



Donald Trump is under no requirement to play political games.
Donald Trumpís tax returns are confidential.

Now back to your dumpster diving.


sckeys - 10/8/2018 at 12:35 AM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
Even


Donald Trump is under no requirement to play political games.
Donald Trumpís tax returns are confidential.




And under no obligation to tell the truth either. The tax return debacle was his lie.


Muleman1994 - 10/8/2018 at 02:36 AM

The only "The tax return debacle" is in Fake News.

Donald Trumpís tax returns are confidential and that is the law.
The rest of the discussion is political crap.


BoytonBrother - 10/8/2018 at 03:39 PM

quote:
The only "The tax return debacle" is in Fake News.

Donald Trumpís tax returns are confidential and that is the law.
The rest of the discussion is political crap.


Look at Muleman sticking up for his man, so romantic!


Muleman1994 - 10/8/2018 at 11:26 PM

quote:
quote:
The only "The tax return debacle" is in Fake News.

Donald Trumpís tax returns are confidential and that is the law.
The rest of the discussion is political crap.


Look at Muleman sticking up for his man, so romantic!



I prefer facts.

Anyone who actually read the NYT hit piece, with an open mind, would have noticed the lack of facts or the opinions made cannot be verified.

By hey, if it make the far-left extremists happy...


pops42 - 10/9/2018 at 12:04 AM

quote:
quote:
quote:
The only "The tax return debacle" is in Fake News.

Donald Trumpís tax returns are confidential and that is the law.
The rest of the discussion is political crap.


Look at Muleman sticking up for his man, so romantic!



I prefer facts.



LMFAO!


This thread come from : Hittin' The Web with the Allman Brothers Band
http://allmanbrothersband.com/

Url of this website:
http://allmanbrothersband.com//modules.php?op=modload&name=XForum&file=viewthread&fid=127&tid=147235