Thread: Tic-Toc

LeglizHemp - 8/21/2018 at 07:18 PM

Michael Cohen expected to plead to multiple counts of campaign finance, tax fraud and bank fraud
From CNN's Adam Levine


Michael Cohen is expected to plead guilty to multiple counts of campaign finance violations, tax fraud and bank fraud as part of the deal, according to three sources.

The deal would include jail time and a substantial monetary fine.

Among the sticking points in the talks, the two sides were negotiating over jail time, according to one source. Cohen is pressing for three years but prosecutors are seeking 50 months.

Cohen has been concerned about asset forfeiture, leaving his family with nothing.

Prosecutors made clear that there was a bigger risk should he go to trial and be found guilty, that he would have forfeit assets.


sckeys - 8/21/2018 at 07:22 PM

Went ahead and took a swan dive under that bus.


LeglizHemp - 8/21/2018 at 08:33 PM

BREAKING: Manafort jury reaches verdict on some counts, but not all
The jury in the Paul Manafort trial has reached a verdict on eight counts, but it can't reach consensus on 10 counts.

Earlier on Tuesday, the jury asked Judge T.S. Ellis what would happen if they couldn't reach a verdict on a count, and Ellis said to keep working on it.


Muleman1994 - 8/21/2018 at 08:43 PM

quote:
Michael Cohen expected to plead to multiple counts of campaign finance, tax fraud and bank fraud
From CNN's Adam Levine


Michael Cohen is expected to plead guilty to multiple counts of campaign finance violations, tax fraud and bank fraud as part of the deal, according to three sources.

The deal would include jail time and a substantial monetary fine.

Among the sticking points in the talks, the two sides were negotiating over jail time, according to one source. Cohen is pressing for three years but prosecutors are seeking 50 months.

Cohen has been concerned about asset forfeiture, leaving his family with nothing.

Prosecutors made clear that there was a bigger risk should he go to trial and be found guilty, that he would have forfeit assets.



Isn't that cute.
Donald Trump not involved and Cohen will not have to tell the court or prosecutors anything about Donald Trump.

Overblown hype by the left.


Muleman1994 - 8/21/2018 at 08:46 PM

quote:
BREAKING: Manafort jury reaches verdict on some counts, but not all
The jury in the Paul Manafort trial has reached a verdict on eight counts, but it can't reach consensus on 10 counts.

Earlier on Tuesday, the jury asked Judge T.S. Ellis what would happen if they couldn't reach a verdict on a count, and Ellis said to keep working on it.





Even better,

The corrupt liberal media has been hyping this as the trial of the century and "Trump is going down".

All crap.

The charges against Manafort do not have anything to do with Donald Trump.

Overblown hype by the left... again.


DOVETAIL - 8/21/2018 at 09:06 PM

quote:
Michael Cohen expected to plead to multiple counts of campaign finance, tax fraud and bank fraud
From CNN's Adam Levine


Michael Cohen is expected to plead guilty to multiple counts of campaign finance violations, tax fraud and bank fraud as part of the deal, according to three sources.

The deal would include jail time and a substantial monetary fine.

Among the sticking points in the talks, the two sides were negotiating over jail time, according to one source. Cohen is pressing for three years but prosecutors are seeking 50 months.

Cohen has been concerned about asset forfeiture, leaving his family with nothing.

Prosecutors made clear that there was a bigger risk should he go to trial and be found guilty, that he would have forfeit assets.


eager to hear the Muleman spin on Cohen's pleas??!??
Also if he (Muleman) will support Michael Avenatti's run for President...???---Make a good press secretary?!?!?!....HARHARHAR!!!!!


jkeller - 8/21/2018 at 09:08 PM

quote:
quote:
BREAKING: Manafort jury reaches verdict on some counts, but not all
The jury in the Paul Manafort trial has reached a verdict on eight counts, but it can't reach consensus on 10 counts.

Earlier on Tuesday, the jury asked Judge T.S. Ellis what would happen if they couldn't reach a verdict on a count, and Ellis said to keep working on it.





Even better,

The corrupt liberal media has been hyping this as the trial of the century and "Trump is going down".

All crap.

The charges against Manafort do not have anything to do with Donald Trump.

Overblown hype by the left... again.



No, Cohen's plea deal will bring Trump down.


Muleman1994 - 8/21/2018 at 09:12 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
BREAKING: Manafort jury reaches verdict on some counts, but not all
The jury in the Paul Manafort trial has reached a verdict on eight counts, but it can't reach consensus on 10 counts.

Earlier on Tuesday, the jury asked Judge T.S. Ellis what would happen if they couldn't reach a verdict on a count, and Ellis said to keep working on it.





Even better,

The corrupt liberal media has been hyping this as the trial of the century and "Trump is going down".

All crap.

The charges against Manafort do not have anything to do with Donald Trump.

Overblown hype by the left... again.



No, Cohen's plea deal will bring Trump down.



Parroting Fake News (formally known as CNN) or conspiracy TV MSNBC?

Okay, explain how "Cohen's plea deal will bring Trump down".
Go ahead, we'll wait.


PhotoRon286 - 8/21/2018 at 09:14 PM

quote:
quote:
Michael Cohen expected to plead to multiple counts of campaign finance, tax fraud and bank fraud
From CNN's Adam Levine


Michael Cohen is expected to plead guilty to multiple counts of campaign finance violations, tax fraud and bank fraud as part of the deal, according to three sources.

The deal would include jail time and a substantial monetary fine.

Among the sticking points in the talks, the two sides were negotiating over jail time, according to one source. Cohen is pressing for three years but prosecutors are seeking 50 months.

Cohen has been concerned about asset forfeiture, leaving his family with nothing.

Prosecutors made clear that there was a bigger risk should he go to trial and be found guilty, that he would have forfeit assets.


eager to hear the Muleman spin on Cohen's pleas??!??
Also if he (Muleman) will support Michael Avenatti's run for President...???---Make a good press secretary?!?!?!....HARHARHAR!!!!!


cohen implicated trump in his plea.

Twice.


HAHAHAHAHAAA!!!


Another maga moron bites the dust.

Can't wait to watch an unhinged trump "rally" tonight.


jkeller - 8/21/2018 at 09:16 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
BREAKING: Manafort jury reaches verdict on some counts, but not all
The jury in the Paul Manafort trial has reached a verdict on eight counts, but it can't reach consensus on 10 counts.

Earlier on Tuesday, the jury asked Judge T.S. Ellis what would happen if they couldn't reach a verdict on a count, and Ellis said to keep working on it.





Even better,

The corrupt liberal media has been hyping this as the trial of the century and "Trump is going down".

All crap.

The charges against Manafort do not have anything to do with Donald Trump.

Overblown hype by the left... again.



No, Cohen's plea deal will bring Trump down.



Parroting Fake News (formally known as CNN) or conspiracy TV MSNBC?

Okay, explain how "Cohen's plea deal will bring Trump down".
Go ahead, we'll wait.



OK, Cohen pled guilty to count 8. Cohen said that while in the employ of a political candidate, he paid off a third party $150,000 at the direction of the candidate, The candidate then reimbursed Cohen the $150,000. He also pled guilty to count 7 which concerned a $130,000 payof to a different person.

These are violations of campaign finance law and are impeachable offenses.


2112 - 8/21/2018 at 09:46 PM

Lots of witches going to jail. Trump hires only the best criminals.


BoytonBrother - 8/21/2018 at 10:12 PM

He also said Trump authorized and knew about the meeting at Trump tower with the Russians.


MartinD28 - 8/21/2018 at 10:13 PM

quote:
Lots of witches going to jail. Trump hires only the best criminals.


Remember that Trump always brags about "the best" when associated" with himself. No doubt he runs the best criminal enterprise out there in the political arena.

Who is next - Don Jr.? Jared?

Pardons in the making?


MartinD28 - 8/21/2018 at 10:16 PM

From Newsweek

"Michael Cohen Says Donald Trump Directed Him to Pay Stormy Daniels and Violate Campaign Finance Laws"

https://www.newsweek.com/michael-cohen-says-donald-trump-directed-him-viola te-campaign-finance-laws-1084213

Sad!


BrerRabbit - 8/21/2018 at 10:58 PM

Isn't this the point where we are supposed to make juvenile jests about Stormy Daniels?


jkeller - 8/21/2018 at 11:04 PM

quote:
Isn't this the point where we are supposed to make juvenile jests about Stormy Daniels?


Goob will be here to do that soon enough. Then he will ask what is the big deal about paying off a porn star.


MartinD28 - 8/21/2018 at 11:36 PM

quote:
quote:
Isn't this the point where we are supposed to make juvenile jests about Stormy Daniels?


Goob will be here to do that soon enough. Then he will ask what is the big deal about paying off a porn star.


I think goob uses the legal term "sword swallower". Looking more & more that Dictator Don is a co-conspirator to paying off a sword swallower in attempts to violate campaign finance laws.

Waiting to hear from GOP Congressmen who have cow tailed to Trump thus far. They're probably just jealous that they haven't had their own rounds with a sword swallower.


MartinD28 - 8/22/2018 at 12:39 AM

Watched the end of Trump's West Va speech on FOX. When asked about today's events for Trump compliments of Cohen & Manafort, the lady who was the guest (don't know her name), downplayed the events and said they've been baked in for the last year, and then she moved on to talk about his great speech.

Yep...baked in. Wonder what else is baked in for Sheep Pie compliments of State TV? Only on FOX - the real news of the people


DOVETAIL - 8/22/2018 at 12:41 AM

quote:
quote:
quote:
Isn't this the point where we are supposed to make juvenile jests about Stormy Daniels?


Goob will be here to do that soon enough. Then he will ask what is the big deal about paying off a porn star.


I think goob uses the legal term "sword swallower". Looking more & more that Dictator Don is a co-conspirator to paying off a sword swallower in attempts to violate campaign finance laws.

Waiting to hear from GOP Congressmen who have cow tailed to Trump thus far. They're probably just jealous that they haven't had their own rounds with a sword swallower.

Waiting to hear from the curiously absent Muleman1994!?!?....Is he at TrumptyDumpty's rally tonight (or in front of his TV) chanting "Lock her up!"?


Muleman1994 - 8/22/2018 at 01:35 AM

No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.
Mueller failed.


jkeller - 8/22/2018 at 01:40 AM

quote:
No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.
Mueller failed.




The investigation is not over yet.

But Trump is guilty of violating campaign finance law.

Remember when you claimed that Trump wasn't under investigation? Good times!


MartinD28 - 8/22/2018 at 01:52 AM

Patience - This is how Mueller builds a case - very methodically & strategically. Just the opposite is how Trump and Rudy run a PR campaign by impusively throwing jello against a wall & hoping something will stick. If Trump is innocent, he wouldn't state no collusion and no obstruction daily. He talks & acts like a man full of guilt, The wagons are circling, and given time, Mueller will show more of his hand as Trump runs around the country doing self promotion tours where base crowds stroke his ego.


2112 - 8/22/2018 at 01:55 AM

quote:
No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.
Mueller failed.




Mueller failed huh? Two criminals going to jail today. That's a good day for Mueller and a good day for America.

Mule, why does Trump keep saying he hires the best people, but he surrounds himself with criminals? Why is that? He spends half his time of Twitter criticizing people he hired himself. Does he hire the best people or does he not? Are all the best people criminals? Are all of Trump's buddies and lawyers criminals and he just happens to be the one guy among his crowd that is clean? Seems unlikely. But Mueller hasn't shown all his cards yet. I think we will see indictments against his family soon. Can't wait to see his Twitter feed as he tries to distance himself from his family.


BrerRabbit - 8/22/2018 at 02:00 AM

Watch me now, I'm goin down . ...


sckeys - 8/22/2018 at 02:21 AM

quote:
. No Collusion





That’s a funny.


PhotoRon286 - 8/22/2018 at 02:24 AM

quote:
Watch me now, I'm goin down . ...


Nice Zappa reference.

muleturd isn't having much luck spinning this news, is he?

Where's goober?

HAHAHAHAHAHHAAAAA!!!!


StratDal - 8/22/2018 at 01:37 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
BREAKING: Manafort jury reaches verdict on some counts, but not all
The jury in the Paul Manafort trial has reached a verdict on eight counts, but it can't reach consensus on 10 counts.

Earlier on Tuesday, the jury asked Judge T.S. Ellis what would happen if they couldn't reach a verdict on a count, and Ellis said to keep working on it.





Even better,

The corrupt liberal media has been hyping this as the trial of the century and "Trump is going down".

All crap.

The charges against Manafort do not have anything to do with Donald Trump.

Overblown hype by the left... again.



No, Cohen's plea deal will bring Trump down.


I don't know about that however, the president's personal legal matters have become a lot more complicated for him.

I'm just surprised that it's been less than 24 hours and he hasn't blamed President Obama.


StratDal - 8/22/2018 at 01:40 PM

quote:
No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.
Mueller failed.




Mueller failed? There must be some fake news out then in that Mueller hasn't completed his investigation.


sckeys - 8/22/2018 at 01:51 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:


I'm just surprised that it's been less than 24 hours and he hasn't blamed President Obama.


He is, just seen it as I was reading your post.


2112 - 8/22/2018 at 04:31 PM

quote:
quote:
No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.
Mueller failed.




Mueller failed? There must be some fake news out then in that Mueller hasn't completed his investigation.


I hope Mueller doesn't fail. He is the one hope that there still exists Republicans with honestly and integrity left in this country.


StratDal - 8/22/2018 at 05:48 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.
Mueller failed.




Mueller failed? There must be some fake news out then in that Mueller hasn't completed his investigation.


I hope Mueller doesn't fail. He is the one hope that there still exists Republicans with honestly and integrity left in this country.


I hope that Mueller completes his investigation thoroughly and comes to a finding (whatever it may be) that is firm based on facts and evidence.


DOVETAIL - 8/22/2018 at 08:52 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.
Mueller failed.




Mueller failed? There must be some fake news out then in that Mueller hasn't completed his investigation.


I hope Mueller doesn't fail. He is the one hope that there still exists Republicans with honestly and integrity left in this country.


I hope that Mueller completes his investigation thoroughly and comes to a finding (whatever it may be) that is firm based on facts and evidence.


We can give Mueller at least as much time and money as was spent on 'investigation' of Benghazi, can't we?


BrerRabbit - 8/22/2018 at 10:28 PM


LeglizHemp - 8/23/2018 at 12:12 AM

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-basically-admitted-federa l-crime_us_5b7da81de4b07295150f49f6


OriginalGoober - 8/23/2018 at 12:40 AM



So they raided his office and took all sorts of client-confidential material and STILL need Cohen to testify to support some flimsy allegations? Sad. All these tactics uncover is a double-standard in the Justice Dept.... which most Americans believe already because Crooked Hillary investigation was swept under the rug and NO CHARGES brought.....


BrerRabbit - 8/23/2018 at 01:26 AM

You gotta be kidding.


sckeys - 8/23/2018 at 01:33 AM

quote:


So they raided his office and took all sorts of client-confidential material and STILL need Cohen to testify to support some flimsy allegations? Sad. All these tactics uncover is a double-standard in the Justice Dept.... which most Americans believe already because Crooked Hillary investigation was swept under the rug and NO CHARGES brought.....


Why not charge her now with all the evidence they have? It’s a Republican DOJ. It’s not out of limitations. If there was anything to the “what about Hillary” claims, they wouldnt just be talking about it at every chance.


jkeller - 8/23/2018 at 01:51 AM

quote:


So they raided his office and took all sorts of client-confidential material and STILL need Cohen to testify to support some flimsy allegations? Sad. All these tactics uncover is a double-standard in the Justice Dept.... which most Americans believe already because Crooked Hillary investigation was swept under the rug and NO CHARGES brought.....


Hey goob, Hillary broke no laws. Deal with it.


2112 - 8/23/2018 at 02:24 AM

quote:


So they raided his office and took all sorts of client-confidential material and STILL need Cohen to testify to support some flimsy allegations? Sad. All these tactics uncover is a double-standard in the Justice Dept.... which most Americans believe already because Crooked Hillary investigation was swept under the rug and NO CHARGES brought.....


They don't need Cohen to testify. His plea agreement does not require him to assist Mueller in his investigation. In fact, Cohen's investigation is separate than Mueller. Cohen was a powerful attorney to the Trump Crime Family. He knows what he is doing. If the investigation was not on the up and up, he would be able to get to of it.

Why do you believe every investigation that surrounds Trump is flimsy? If it was, we wouldn't have seen so many plea deals and convictions. My question is why do you want these criminals to get away with their crimes? Does white collar crime not bother you? Does it have to be an illegal committing a murder before you get bothered?


MartinD28 - 8/23/2018 at 11:56 AM

quote:
quote:


So they raided his office and took all sorts of client-confidential material and STILL need Cohen to testify to support some flimsy allegations? Sad. All these tactics uncover is a double-standard in the Justice Dept.... which most Americans believe already because Crooked Hillary investigation was swept under the rug and NO CHARGES brought.....


They don't need Cohen to testify. His plea agreement does not require him to assist Mueller in his investigation. In fact, Cohen's investigation is separate than Mueller. Cohen was a powerful attorney to the Trump Crime Family. He knows what he is doing. If the investigation was not on the up and up, he would be able to get to of it.

Why do you believe every investigation that surrounds Trump is flimsy? If it was, we wouldn't have seen so many plea deals and convictions. My question is why do you want these criminals to get away with their crimes? Does white collar crime not bother you? Does it have to be an illegal committing a murder before you get bothered?


Trump & goob don't seem to be bothered by white collar crime. They deflect to Obama & HC. Escape from reality is a good strategy, right?

Manafort defrauded the US gov't out of millions of dollars in taxes, but Trump, in typical Trump fashion reaped praise on a convicted criminal. On the other hand, Trump, after many years of having loyalist Cohen fix dirty problems for Trump is now seen by by Trump as a bad lawyer. Trump saw him as a great lawyer when he was making Trump's dirty affairs go away. The one criteria that matters to Trump more than anything is loyalty. He even prioritizes loyalty over legality.


"Trump Praises Manafort, Saying ‘Unlike Michael Cohen’ He ‘Refused to Break’"

From NY Times - see below:

By Julie Hirschfeld Davis and Eileen Sullivan
Aug. 22, 2018

1171
WASHINGTON — President Trump on Wednesday praised his just-convicted former campaign chairman for refusing to “break” and cooperate with federal prosecutors investigating Russia’s interference in the 2016 election, expressing appreciation for the personal loyalty of a felon found guilty of defrauding the United States government.

In a series of tweets the morning after an extraordinary day in which Paul Manafort, his former campaign chief, was convicted of tax and bank fraud and his longtime personal lawyer, Michael D. Cohen, pleaded guilty to campaign finance violations he said were directed by Mr. Trump, the president appeared to suggest he was more concerned with the fallout for himself than with the crimes.

He compared Mr. Cohen unfavorably with Mr. Manafort, attacking Mr. Cohen as a bad lawyer who had caved to pressure from biased federal prosecutors while lauding Mr. Manafort as a “brave man” with a “wonderful family” who had stood strong.


BoytonBrother - 8/23/2018 at 12:56 PM

quote:
So they raided his office and took all sorts of client-confidential material and STILL need Cohen to testify to support some flimsy allegations? Sad. All these tactics uncover is a double-standard in the Justice Dept.... which most Americans believe already because Crooked Hillary investigation was swept under the rug and NO CHARGES brought.....


Zzzzzzzzz. I give this attempt an F. Pretending to understand law wasn’t convincing. The double standard / crooked Hillary routine is stale. Come back with better material. Make threads interesting again.


StratDal - 8/23/2018 at 04:19 PM

quote:


So they raided his office and took all sorts of client-confidential material and STILL need Cohen to testify to support some flimsy allegations? Sad. All these tactics uncover is a double-standard in the Justice Dept.... which most Americans believe already because Crooked Hillary investigation was swept under the rug and NO CHARGES brought.....


That's almost as good as Mule arguing that President Obama didn't get Bin Ladin.


LeglizHemp - 8/24/2018 at 08:42 PM

tic

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/david-pecker-donald-trump-jerry-george _us_5b802d8ce4b0729515128cad

toc

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/allen-weisselberg-immunity-cohen-inves tigation_us_5b801bc4e4b0cd327dfc3fb1


LeglizHemp - 8/25/2018 at 04:07 AM

tic

https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/24/politics/trump-tower-doorman-contract-ami/in dex.html


BrerRabbit - 8/25/2018 at 04:11 AM

dammit hemp you're making me nervous with this tic toc thing.


LeglizHemp - 8/25/2018 at 04:18 AM

LOL


Muleman1994 - 8/26/2018 at 07:20 PM

No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.

After yet another complete failure to demonstrate any of the left’s so-called “collusion with Russia” or any obstruction of justice the far-left and the corrupt liberal media are falsely claiming that the Michael Cohen matter shows campaign finance violations.

Not even close.

If there was any campaign finance violation that would be a civil case. The SDNY is trying to bring a criminal case which never happens.

Obama accepted $2 million in illegal campaign donations and was only slapped with a civil fine for $375, 000.

The tax issues Manafort is prosecuted for happened in 2005/06. Nothing to do with Donald Trump.

Yet again the left and the corrupt liberal media have nothing.

No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.



jkeller - 8/26/2018 at 07:59 PM

quote:
No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.

After yet another complete failure to demonstrate any of the left’s so-called “collusion with Russia” or any obstruction of justice the far-left and the corrupt liberal media are falsely claiming that the Michael Cohen matter shows campaign finance violations.

Not even close.

If there was any campaign finance violation that would be a civil case. The SDNY is trying to bring a criminal case which never happens.

Obama accepted $2 million in illegal campaign donations and was only slapped with a civil fine for $375, 000.

The tax issues Manafort is prosecuted for happened in 2005/06. Nothing to do with Donald Trump.

Yet again the left and the corrupt liberal media have nothing.

No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.




They are not bringing a criminal case. They brought it and Cohen pleaded guilty. Because it is a violation of federal law and is a felony.

Our resident genius thinks Cohen pleaded guilty to a crime that wasn't a crime.


Chain - 8/26/2018 at 08:21 PM

quote:
No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.

After yet another complete failure to demonstrate any of the left’s so-called “collusion with Russia” or any obstruction of justice the far-left and the corrupt liberal media are falsely claiming that the Michael Cohen matter shows campaign finance violations.

Not even close.

If there was any campaign finance violation that would be a civil case. The SDNY is trying to bring a criminal case which never happens.

Obama accepted $2 million in illegal campaign donations and was only slapped with a civil fine for $375, 000.

The tax issues Manafort is prosecuted for happened in 2005/06. Nothing to do with Donald Trump.

Yet again the left and the corrupt liberal media have nothing.

No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.





Your script is tired and predictable, Bot Boy....The time has come for your supervisor in the next cubicle over to write a new one since you clearly are incapable of spewing anything remotely original much less persuasive.


Muleman1994 - 8/26/2018 at 09:13 PM

quote:
quote:
No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.

After yet another complete failure to demonstrate any of the left’s so-called “collusion with Russia” or any obstruction of justice the far-left and the corrupt liberal media are falsely claiming that the Michael Cohen matter shows campaign finance violations.

Not even close.

If there was any campaign finance violation that would be a civil case. The SDNY is trying to bring a criminal case which never happens.

Obama accepted $2 million in illegal campaign donations and was only slapped with a civil fine for $375, 000.

The tax issues Manafort is prosecuted for happened in 2005/06. Nothing to do with Donald Trump.

Yet again the left and the corrupt liberal media have nothing.

No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.




They are not bringing a criminal case. They brought it and Cohen pleaded guilty. Because it is a violation of federal law and is a felony.

Our resident genius thinks Cohen pleaded guilty to a crime that wasn't a crime.





The campaign finance violation as a criminal case was mentioned by the SDNY and that is what the far-left extremists and corrupt liberal media are mouthing-off about.

Try to keep up son.


jkeller - 8/26/2018 at 10:19 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.

After yet another complete failure to demonstrate any of the left’s so-called “collusion with Russia” or any obstruction of justice the far-left and the corrupt liberal media are falsely claiming that the Michael Cohen matter shows campaign finance violations.

Not even close.

If there was any campaign finance violation that would be a civil case. The SDNY is trying to bring a criminal case which never happens.

Obama accepted $2 million in illegal campaign donations and was only slapped with a civil fine for $375, 000.

The tax issues Manafort is prosecuted for happened in 2005/06. Nothing to do with Donald Trump.

Yet again the left and the corrupt liberal media have nothing.

No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.




They are not bringing a criminal case. They brought it and Cohen pleaded guilty. Because it is a violation of federal law and is a felony.

Our resident genius thinks Cohen pleaded guilty to a crime that wasn't a crime.





The campaign finance violation as a criminal case was mentioned by the SDNY and that is what the far-left extremists and corrupt liberal media are mouthing-off about.

Try to keep up son.



Click this link and read counts 7 and 8.

https://www.vox.com/2018/8/21/17765496/michael-cohen-plea-deal-sdny-crimina l-prison




Cohen pleaded guilty to all of the charges, including failing to report $4 million in taxes. He said he violated campaign finance laws in coordination with and at the direction of an unnamed candidate — presumably Trump — in coordinating payouts to porn actress Stormy Daniels and former Playboy model Karen McDougal, both of whom alleged to have had affairs with Trump. He said he acted for the purpose of influencing an election.


It was more than "mentioned", whatever you mean by that. It was an actual charge. Trump is an unindicted co-conspirator for now.


Don't ever disparage the intelligence of anyone on this site if you cannot grasp what has been written and reported in plain English.



Muleman1994 - 8/26/2018 at 11:45 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.

After yet another complete failure to demonstrate any of the left’s so-called “collusion with Russia” or any obstruction of justice the far-left and the corrupt liberal media are falsely claiming that the Michael Cohen matter shows campaign finance violations.

Not even close.

If there was any campaign finance violation that would be a civil case. The SDNY is trying to bring a criminal case which never happens.

Obama accepted $2 million in illegal campaign donations and was only slapped with a civil fine for $375, 000.

The tax issues Manafort is prosecuted for happened in 2005/06. Nothing to do with Donald Trump.

Yet again the left and the corrupt liberal media have nothing.

No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.




They are not bringing a criminal case. They brought it and Cohen pleaded guilty. Because it is a violation of federal law and is a felony.

Our resident genius thinks Cohen pleaded guilty to a crime that wasn't a crime.





The campaign finance violation as a criminal case was mentioned by the SDNY and that is what the far-left extremists and corrupt liberal media are mouthing-off about.

Try to keep up son.



Click this link and read counts 7 and 8.

https://www.vox.com/2018/8/21/17765496/michael-cohen-plea-deal-sdny-crimina l-prison




Cohen pleaded guilty to all of the charges, including failing to report $4 million in taxes. He said he violated campaign finance laws in coordination with and at the direction of an unnamed candidate — presumably Trump — in coordinating payouts to porn actress Stormy Daniels and former Playboy model Karen McDougal, both of whom alleged to have had affairs with Trump. He said he acted for the purpose of influencing an election.


It was more than "mentioned", whatever you mean by that. It was an actual charge. Trump is an unindicted co-conspirator for now.


Don't ever disparage the intelligence of anyone on this site if you cannot grasp what has been written and reported in plain English.






"He said he violated campaign finance laws" but not in court. Cohen said that publicly for an obvious reason.
If the SDNY tries to pursue the matter it will have to be a civil case.

The case against Cohen is weak.
Why do you think Mueller dumped it to SDNY and his prosecutors are not involved?

No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.


2112 - 8/26/2018 at 11:51 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.

After yet another complete failure to demonstrate any of the left’s so-called “collusion with Russia” or any obstruction of justice the far-left and the corrupt liberal media are falsely claiming that the Michael Cohen matter shows campaign finance violations.

Not even close.

If there was any campaign finance violation that would be a civil case. The SDNY is trying to bring a criminal case which never happens.

Obama accepted $2 million in illegal campaign donations and was only slapped with a civil fine for $375, 000.

The tax issues Manafort is prosecuted for happened in 2005/06. Nothing to do with Donald Trump.

Yet again the left and the corrupt liberal media have nothing.

No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.




They are not bringing a criminal case. They brought it and Cohen pleaded guilty. Because it is a violation of federal law and is a felony.

Our resident genius thinks Cohen pleaded guilty to a crime that wasn't a crime.





The campaign finance violation as a criminal case was mentioned by the SDNY and that is what the far-left extremists and corrupt liberal media are mouthing-off about.

Try to keep up son.



Click this link and read counts 7 and 8.

https://www.vox.com/2018/8/21/17765496/michael-cohen-plea-deal-sdny-crimina l-prison




Cohen pleaded guilty to all of the charges, including failing to report $4 million in taxes. He said he violated campaign finance laws in coordination with and at the direction of an unnamed candidate — presumably Trump — in coordinating payouts to porn actress Stormy Daniels and former Playboy model Karen McDougal, both of whom alleged to have had affairs with Trump. He said he acted for the purpose of influencing an election.


It was more than "mentioned", whatever you mean by that. It was an actual charge. Trump is an unindicted co-conspirator for now.


Don't ever disparage the intelligence of anyone on this site if you cannot grasp what has been written and reported in plain English.






"He said he violated campaign finance laws" but not in court. Cohen said that publicly for an obvious reason.
If the SDNY tries to pursue the matter it will have to be a civil case.

The case against Cohen is weak.
Why do you think Mueller dumped it to SDNY and his prosecutors are not involved?

No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.



If the case against Cohen was weak he would have never pleaded guilty. Seriously, spit out the Kool-aid and use your brain.


Muleman1994 - 8/27/2018 at 12:08 AM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.

After yet another complete failure to demonstrate any of the left’s so-called “collusion with Russia” or any obstruction of justice the far-left and the corrupt liberal media are falsely claiming that the Michael Cohen matter shows campaign finance violations.

Not even close.

If there was any campaign finance violation that would be a civil case. The SDNY is trying to bring a criminal case which never happens.

Obama accepted $2 million in illegal campaign donations and was only slapped with a civil fine for $375, 000.

The tax issues Manafort is prosecuted for happened in 2005/06. Nothing to do with Donald Trump.

Yet again the left and the corrupt liberal media have nothing.

No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.




They are not bringing a criminal case. They brought it and Cohen pleaded guilty. Because it is a violation of federal law and is a felony.

Our resident genius thinks Cohen pleaded guilty to a crime that wasn't a crime.





The campaign finance violation as a criminal case was mentioned by the SDNY and that is what the far-left extremists and corrupt liberal media are mouthing-off about.

Try to keep up son.



Click this link and read counts 7 and 8.

https://www.vox.com/2018/8/21/17765496/michael-cohen-plea-deal-sdny-crimina l-prison




Cohen pleaded guilty to all of the charges, including failing to report $4 million in taxes. He said he violated campaign finance laws in coordination with and at the direction of an unnamed candidate — presumably Trump — in coordinating payouts to porn actress Stormy Daniels and former Playboy model Karen McDougal, both of whom alleged to have had affairs with Trump. He said he acted for the purpose of influencing an election.


It was more than "mentioned", whatever you mean by that. It was an actual charge. Trump is an unindicted co-conspirator for now.


Don't ever disparage the intelligence of anyone on this site if you cannot grasp what has been written and reported in plain English.






"He said he violated campaign finance laws" but not in court. Cohen said that publicly for an obvious reason.
If the SDNY tries to pursue the matter it will have to be a civil case.

The case against Cohen is weak.
Why do you think Mueller dumped it to SDNY and his prosecutors are not involved?

No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.



If the case against Cohen was weak he would have never pleaded guilty. Seriously, spit out the Kool-aid and use your brain.



Try again.

If Mueller had anything he would not have dumped the case off to the SDNY and in the plea Cohen has no obligation to cooperate.

This Cohen issue is a sideshow.

No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.



jkeller - 8/27/2018 at 12:30 AM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.

After yet another complete failure to demonstrate any of the left’s so-called “collusion with Russia” or any obstruction of justice the far-left and the corrupt liberal media are falsely claiming that the Michael Cohen matter shows campaign finance violations.

Not even close.

If there was any campaign finance violation that would be a civil case. The SDNY is trying to bring a criminal case which never happens.

Obama accepted $2 million in illegal campaign donations and was only slapped with a civil fine for $375, 000.

The tax issues Manafort is prosecuted for happened in 2005/06. Nothing to do with Donald Trump.

Yet again the left and the corrupt liberal media have nothing.

No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.




They are not bringing a criminal case. They brought it and Cohen pleaded guilty. Because it is a violation of federal law and is a felony.

Our resident genius thinks Cohen pleaded guilty to a crime that wasn't a crime.





The campaign finance violation as a criminal case was mentioned by the SDNY and that is what the far-left extremists and corrupt liberal media are mouthing-off about.

Try to keep up son.



Click this link and read counts 7 and 8.

https://www.vox.com/2018/8/21/17765496/michael-cohen-plea-deal-sdny-crimina l-prison




Cohen pleaded guilty to all of the charges, including failing to report $4 million in taxes. He said he violated campaign finance laws in coordination with and at the direction of an unnamed candidate — presumably Trump — in coordinating payouts to porn actress Stormy Daniels and former Playboy model Karen McDougal, both of whom alleged to have had affairs with Trump. He said he acted for the purpose of influencing an election.


It was more than "mentioned", whatever you mean by that. It was an actual charge. Trump is an unindicted co-conspirator for now.


Don't ever disparage the intelligence of anyone on this site if you cannot grasp what has been written and reported in plain English.






"He said he violated campaign finance laws" but not in court. Cohen said that publicly for an obvious reason.
If the SDNY tries to pursue the matter it will have to be a civil case.

The case against Cohen is weak.
Why do you think Mueller dumped it to SDNY and his prosecutors are not involved?

No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.



If the case against Cohen was weak he would have never pleaded guilty. Seriously, spit out the Kool-aid and use your brain.



Try again.

If Mueller had anything he would not have dumped the case off to the SDNY and in the plea Cohen has no obligation to cooperate.

This Cohen issue is a sideshow.

No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.





He passed it off because it was outside the scope of his investigation. However, according to Cohen's lawyer, Cohen is cooperating with Mueller as part of the plea deal.

I know this is too complicated for you, but take your time and read up on it. And think hard about what is happening.


Muleman1994 - 8/27/2018 at 01:22 AM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.

After yet another complete failure to demonstrate any of the left’s so-called “collusion with Russia” or any obstruction of justice the far-left and the corrupt liberal media are falsely claiming that the Michael Cohen matter shows campaign finance violations.

Not even close.

If there was any campaign finance violation that would be a civil case. The SDNY is trying to bring a criminal case which never happens.

Obama accepted $2 million in illegal campaign donations and was only slapped with a civil fine for $375, 000.

The tax issues Manafort is prosecuted for happened in 2005/06. Nothing to do with Donald Trump.

Yet again the left and the corrupt liberal media have nothing.

No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.




They are not bringing a criminal case. They brought it and Cohen pleaded guilty. Because it is a violation of federal law and is a felony.

Our resident genius thinks Cohen pleaded guilty to a crime that wasn't a crime.





The campaign finance violation as a criminal case was mentioned by the SDNY and that is what the far-left extremists and corrupt liberal media are mouthing-off about.

Try to keep up son.



Click this link and read counts 7 and 8.

https://www.vox.com/2018/8/21/17765496/michael-cohen-plea-deal-sdny-crimina l-prison




Cohen pleaded guilty to all of the charges, including failing to report $4 million in taxes. He said he violated campaign finance laws in coordination with and at the direction of an unnamed candidate — presumably Trump — in coordinating payouts to porn actress Stormy Daniels and former Playboy model Karen McDougal, both of whom alleged to have had affairs with Trump. He said he acted for the purpose of influencing an election.


It was more than "mentioned", whatever you mean by that. It was an actual charge. Trump is an unindicted co-conspirator for now.


Don't ever disparage the intelligence of anyone on this site if you cannot grasp what has been written and reported in plain English.






"He said he violated campaign finance laws" but not in court. Cohen said that publicly for an obvious reason.
If the SDNY tries to pursue the matter it will have to be a civil case.

The case against Cohen is weak.
Why do you think Mueller dumped it to SDNY and his prosecutors are not involved?

No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.



If the case against Cohen was weak he would have never pleaded guilty. Seriously, spit out the Kool-aid and use your brain.



Try again.

If Mueller had anything he would not have dumped the case off to the SDNY and in the plea Cohen has no obligation to cooperate.

This Cohen issue is a sideshow.

No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.





He passed it off because it was outside the scope of his investigation. However, according to Cohen's lawyer, Cohen is cooperating with Mueller as part of the plea deal.

I know this is too complicated for you, but take your time and read up on it. And think hard about what is happening.



Michael Cohen’s lawyer is Lanny Davis aka: The Clinton’s Shyster.

Lanny Davis, well known for lying, is already walking back his comments about Cohen providing anything to any prosecution.

It is a fast-moving world.

Try to keep up.



2112 - 8/27/2018 at 03:09 AM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.

After yet another complete failure to demonstrate any of the left’s so-called “collusion with Russia” or any obstruction of justice the far-left and the corrupt liberal media are falsely claiming that the Michael Cohen matter shows campaign finance violations.

Not even close.

If there was any campaign finance violation that would be a civil case. The SDNY is trying to bring a criminal case which never happens.

Obama accepted $2 million in illegal campaign donations and was only slapped with a civil fine for $375, 000.

The tax issues Manafort is prosecuted for happened in 2005/06. Nothing to do with Donald Trump.

Yet again the left and the corrupt liberal media have nothing.

No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.




They are not bringing a criminal case. They brought it and Cohen pleaded guilty. Because it is a violation of federal law and is a felony.

Our resident genius thinks Cohen pleaded guilty to a crime that wasn't a crime.





The campaign finance violation as a criminal case was mentioned by the SDNY and that is what the far-left extremists and corrupt liberal media are mouthing-off about.

Try to keep up son.



Click this link and read counts 7 and 8.

https://www.vox.com/2018/8/21/17765496/michael-cohen-plea-deal-sdny-crimina l-prison




Cohen pleaded guilty to all of the charges, including failing to report $4 million in taxes. He said he violated campaign finance laws in coordination with and at the direction of an unnamed candidate — presumably Trump — in coordinating payouts to porn actress Stormy Daniels and former Playboy model Karen McDougal, both of whom alleged to have had affairs with Trump. He said he acted for the purpose of influencing an election.


It was more than "mentioned", whatever you mean by that. It was an actual charge. Trump is an unindicted co-conspirator for now.


Don't ever disparage the intelligence of anyone on this site if you cannot grasp what has been written and reported in plain English.






"He said he violated campaign finance laws" but not in court. Cohen said that publicly for an obvious reason.
If the SDNY tries to pursue the matter it will have to be a civil case.

The case against Cohen is weak.
Why do you think Mueller dumped it to SDNY and his prosecutors are not involved?

No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.



If the case against Cohen was weak he would have never pleaded guilty. Seriously, spit out the Kool-aid and use your brain.



Try again.

If Mueller had anything he would not have dumped the case off to the SDNY and in the plea Cohen has no obligation to cooperate.

This Cohen issue is a sideshow.

No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.





He passed it off because it was outside the scope of his investigation. However, according to Cohen's lawyer, Cohen is cooperating with Mueller as part of the plea deal.

I know this is too complicated for you, but take your time and read up on it. And think hard about what is happening.



Michael Cohen’s lawyer is Lanny Davis aka: The Clinton’s Shyster.

Lanny Davis, well known for lying, is already walking back his comments about Cohen providing anything to any prosecution.

It is a fast-moving world.

Try to keep up.





Again, a lawyer will not plead guilty if their isn't a good case against him. And his plea deal doesn't require he cooperate with Mueller. There was obviously a tight case against him.

And since you are supporting the best known liar on the planet, your accusing anyone of lying is and will remain laughable.


BoytonBrother - 8/27/2018 at 01:22 PM

quote:
No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.


No balls in Helsinki, no loyalty to the United States.


adhill58 - 8/27/2018 at 02:07 PM





Michael Cohen’s lawyer is Lanny Davis aka: The Clinton’s Shyster.

Lanny Davis, well known for lying, is already walking back his comments about Cohen providing anything to any prosecution.

It is a fast-moving world.

Try to keep up.






Donald Trump's lawyer is Emmet Flood aka: Bill Clinton's lawyer during his impeachment.

How do you attempt to smear a lawyer Trump employed for ten years by pointing out his hiring of a former Clinton lawyer when Trump has hired a different former Clinton lawyer?

By any logic, all of this would seem to point out that Trump (the genius who only hires the best people) is an bumbling criminal who employed a crappy lawyer for a long time to attempt to cover his tracks... and he may be part of a diabolical conspiracy with the Clintons and their lawyers. Looks like the "globalists" may be winning after all...

If it's bad to have a "Clinton" lawyer, it's bad... But in your mind, it's bad for Cohen, but okay for Trump... Got it. Makes Sense.

The mental hoops that Trump supporters have to jump through to sell themselves a set of realities that are different than what everyone else is viewing have to be exhausting.

(This is similar to Trump saying that the Iraq invasion in 2003 was the worst foreign policy mistake in history and then hiring John Bolton to craft his foreign policy.)


Muleman1994 - 8/27/2018 at 02:16 PM

quote:




Michael Cohen’s lawyer is Lanny Davis aka: The Clinton’s Shyster.

Lanny Davis, well known for lying, is already walking back his comments about Cohen providing anything to any prosecution.

It is a fast-moving world.

Try to keep up.






Donald Trump's lawyer is Emmet Flood aka: Bill Clinton's lawyer during his impeachment.

How do you attempt to smear a lawyer Trump employed for ten years by pointing out his hiring of a former Clinton lawyer when Trump has hired a different former Clinton lawyer?

By any logic, all of this would seem to point out that Trump (the genius who only hires the best people) is an bumbling criminal who employed a crappy lawyer for a long time to attempt to cover his tracks... and he may be part of a diabolical conspiracy with the Clintons and their lawyers. Looks like the "globalists" may be winning after all...

If it's bad to have a "Clinton" lawyer, it's bad... But in your mind, it's bad for Cohen, but okay for Trump... Got it. Makes Sense.

The mental hoops that Trump supporters have to jump through to sell themselves a set of realities that are different than what everyone else is viewing have to be exhausting.

(This is similar to Trump saying that the Iraq invasion in 2003 was the worst foreign policy mistake in history and then hiring John Bolton to craft his foreign policy.)



So?

What does any of this Cohen/Manafort trash have to do with the so-called Russian meddling in the 2016 election?

Right, nothing.

No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.


BoytonBrother - 8/27/2018 at 03:02 PM

quote:
No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.


No charges against Hillary, no charges against Obama.


Muleman1994 - 8/27/2018 at 05:10 PM

Another story the corrupt liberal media and far-left extremists are running away from now:


Lanny Davis Backtracks AGAIN! Walks Back Another Major Allegation Against Trump
http://www.newscats.org/?p=17238

Cohen's attorney backtracks - now says he doesn't know if Trump knew about Russian hacking
http://www.valleynewslive.com/content/news/Cohens-attorney-backtracks---now -says-he-doesnt-know-if-Trump-knew-about-Russian-hacking-491807151.html

Lanny Davis Backtracks, No Longer Claiming That Cohen Has Info To Share W/ Mueller
https://csnbbs.com/printthread.php?tid=856324

COHEN ATTORNEY BACKTRACKS ON CLAIM THAT TRUMP HAD ADVANCE KNOWLEDGE OF RUSSIAN HACKING
https://dailycaller.com/2018/08/26/lanny-davis-trump-hacking/

Another Lie: Cohen Attorney Lanny Davis Backtracks on Claims That Cohen Has Info on Trump’s Knowledge on Russian Efforts
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/08/another-lie-cohen-attorney-lanny-d avis-backtracks-on-claims-that-cohen-has-info-on-trumps-knowledge-on-russia n-efforts/



Sang - 8/27/2018 at 07:26 PM

Now there are some great fake news sites.............


Muleman1994 - 8/27/2018 at 09:23 PM

quote:
Now there are some great fake news sites.............



Of course you throw a quip when your Clinton Shyster gets caught lying yet again.

No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.


Sang - 8/27/2018 at 09:32 PM

No Trump sounds like a winner to me.........


Muleman1994 - 8/27/2018 at 10:04 PM

quote:
No Trump sounds like a winner to me.........



Exactly right.
President Trump is the second most successful President of the modern era.


LeglizHemp - 8/27/2018 at 10:04 PM

Breaking: Manafort.....toc


pops42 - 8/27/2018 at 10:06 PM

quote:
quote:
No Trump sounds like a winner to me.........



Exactly right.
President Trump is the second most successful President of the modern era.



sckeys - 8/27/2018 at 10:54 PM

To borrow a theme from BrerRabbit,

Manafort crack

Manafort. Bad


Muleman1994 - 8/27/2018 at 11:20 PM

quote:
To borrow a theme from BrerRabbit,

Manafort crack

Manafort. Bad



Explain to us what the Cohen or Manafort issues have to do with Russian meddling in the 2016 election.

Exactly right.
Nothing.

No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.


jkeller - 8/27/2018 at 11:26 PM

quote:
quote:
To borrow a theme from BrerRabbit,

Manafort crack

Manafort. Bad



Explain to us what the Cohen or Manafort issues have to do with Russian meddling in the 2016 election.

Exactly right.
Nothing.

No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.



Is Mueller finished? Has he issued his report? Keep running those victory laps.


sckeys - 8/27/2018 at 11:34 PM

quote:
quote:


Explain to us what the Cohen or Manafort issues have to do with Russian meddling in the 2016 election.




We will find out soon enough.


2112 - 8/27/2018 at 11:43 PM

quote:
quote:
No Trump sounds like a winner to me.........



Exactly right.
President Trump is the second most successful President of the modern era.




You are exactly right, as long as you consider the modern era to be the last 9 years.


Muleman1994 - 8/28/2018 at 12:54 AM

quote:
quote:
quote:
To borrow a theme from BrerRabbit,

Manafort crack

Manafort. Bad



Explain to us what the Cohen or Manafort issues have to do with Russian meddling in the 2016 election.

Exactly right.
Nothing.

No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.



Is Mueller finished? Has he issued his report? Keep running those victory laps.


Mueller has nothing to do with the Cohen issue since he dumped it to the SDNY.
Nothing in the Manafort case has anything to do with Russian meddling in the 2016 election.

No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.


BoytonBrother - 8/28/2018 at 02:10 AM

quote:
Mueller has nothing to do with the Cohen issue since he dumped it to the SDNY.
Nothing in the Manafort case has anything to do with Russian meddling in the 2016 election.

No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.


No more military support. I guess you could say that raising the flag was the nail in the coffin, no pun intended.


adhill58 - 8/28/2018 at 01:16 PM

quote:
quote:




Michael Cohen’s lawyer is Lanny Davis aka: The Clinton’s Shyster.

Lanny Davis, well known for lying, is already walking back his comments about Cohen providing anything to any prosecution.

It is a fast-moving world.

Try to keep up.






Donald Trump's lawyer is Emmet Flood aka: Bill Clinton's lawyer during his impeachment.

How do you attempt to smear a lawyer Trump employed for ten years by pointing out his hiring of a former Clinton lawyer when Trump has hired a different former Clinton lawyer?

By any logic, all of this would seem to point out that Trump (the genius who only hires the best people) is an bumbling criminal who employed a crappy lawyer for a long time to attempt to cover his tracks... and he may be part of a diabolical conspiracy with the Clintons and their lawyers. Looks like the "globalists" may be winning after all...

If it's bad to have a "Clinton" lawyer, it's bad... But in your mind, it's bad for Cohen, but okay for Trump... Got it. Makes Sense.

The mental hoops that Trump supporters have to jump through to sell themselves a set of realities that are different than what everyone else is viewing have to be exhausting.

(This is similar to Trump saying that the Iraq invasion in 2003 was the worst foreign policy mistake in history and then hiring John Bolton to craft his foreign policy.)



So?

What does any of this Cohen/Manafort trash have to do with the so-called Russian meddling in the 2016 election?

Right, nothing.

No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction.



So?... If there was "No Russia, No Trump, No Collusion, No Obstruction", why would Trump hire Bill Clinton's former lawyer? That seems like a desperate move for someone whose supporters (you) talk about how shady Michael Cohen looks for using a former Clinton lawyer.

What it has to do with "so-called Russian meddling" is the same group of people changing their stories about each of these a dozen different times as more info becomes public. You know, like how Cohen was great until he was terrible. Trump did not dictate Jr.'s false adoption meeting statement until he did. Trump had no knowledge of thousands of dollars going to porn stars until he did, then he was doing out of love and protection for his wife and son. There are way too many to list at this point.

Also, it is odd that a Trump supporter has a problem with anyone being "well known for lying". What if Lanny Davis lies to the press - would that be okay? Would he become great for sticking it to the "enemy", or would he still be a "shyster"?








[Edited on 8/28/2018 by adhill58]

[Edited on 8/28/2018 by adhill58]


Muleman1994 - 8/28/2018 at 03:09 PM

LANNY DAVIS OBLITERATED CNN’S ‘BOMBSHELL’ REPORT ABOUT MICHAEL COHEN AND TRUMP TOWER
• CNN reported on July 27 that Michael Cohen is willing to tell investigators that Donald Trump authorized the infamous Trump Tower meeting with a group of Russians
• But Cohen’s lawyer now says that bombshell report got “mixed up”
• Lanny Davis says that Cohen “does not” have information that Trump had prior knowledge about the meeting

https://dailycaller.com/2018/08/22/lanny-davis-dispute-trump-tower-cohen/


Lanny Davis admits he was source for CNN's Trump Tower story, lied about it on air
Michael Cohen’s attorney has acknowledged being an anonymous source for the disputed CNN Trump Tower story and also admitted lying on TV about his involvement.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/aug/27/lanny-davis-admits-he-was- source-cnn-trump-tower-s/


adhill58 - 8/28/2018 at 03:44 PM

quote:
LANNY DAVIS OBLITERATED CNN’S ‘BOMBSHELL’ REPORT ABOUT MICHAEL COHEN AND TRUMP TOWER
• CNN reported on July 27 that Michael Cohen is willing to tell investigators that Donald Trump authorized the infamous Trump Tower meeting with a group of Russians
• But Cohen’s lawyer now says that bombshell report got “mixed up”
• Lanny Davis says that Cohen “does not” have information that Trump had prior knowledge about the meeting

https://dailycaller.com/2018/08/22/lanny-davis-dispute-trump-tower-cohen/


Lanny Davis admits he was source for CNN's Trump Tower story, lied about it on air
Michael Cohen’s attorney has acknowledged being an anonymous source for the disputed CNN Trump Tower story and also admitted lying on TV about his involvement.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/aug/27/lanny-davis-admits-he-was- source-cnn-trump-tower-s/




Sounds like how Trump said he did not know about porn star payments, and then Rudy went on Hannity and said Trump knew about them and repaid them. Then Cohen puts out a tape confirming that Trump discussed the arrangement of porn star payments, and Trump goes on Fox and says he did not know about the payments until much later.

The problem is that Trump and Rudy (and the minority of Americans that still support Trump) want to claim that Cohen and his people have credibility issues for the same behavior in which they are indulging.

I am not arguing that Cohen and Davis should be trusted. I would say anyone who worked as Trump's attorney for so long probably cannot remember how to tell the truth. I would also be skeptical of Davis as a top-dollar political attorney having a firm grip on what is objectively true.

But really... How can the Trump supporters say that clients and their lawyers not having their stories straight on TV is proof that one person is lying and the other should be trusted to shut down an investigation into his own shady practices?

That is what I don't get. Everything bad that anyone else does should be rooted out and questioned and/or punished, but the same actions are okay for Trump and his crew because "everybody does it". I thought he was the "law and order" candidate.


adhill58 - 8/28/2018 at 03:51 PM

Trump brags about lying to "Fake News CNN". Has Lanny Davis just crept into your hottest fantasies for doing the same thing?


Muleman1994 - 8/28/2018 at 04:03 PM

quote:
Trump brags about lying to "Fake News CNN". Has Lanny Davis just crept into your hottest fantasies for doing the same thing?



"Trump brags about lying to "Fake News CNN"

Where did you get that crap from?
Or are you just going the Fake News (formally known as CNN) way and lying?


BoytonBrother - 8/28/2018 at 07:02 PM

No Hillary, No Obama, No corruption charges, No pursuit of justice for either by any Republican in Washington. Sad!


Muleman1994 - 8/29/2018 at 12:06 AM

quote:
No Hillary, No Obama, No corruption charges, No pursuit of justice for either by any Republican in Washington. Sad!


Inspector General U.S. Department of Justice Michael E. Horowitz proved the corruption at Obama's FBI.
His next report is on the corruption of Hillary Clinton.




Muleman1994 - 8/29/2018 at 12:28 AM

Lanny Davis says he was wrong about Trump Tower meeting and Cohen

Michael Cohen's lawyer says he shouldn't have confirmed a report Cohen was willing to testify Trump knew about the Trump Tower meeting with Russians in advance.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/lanny-davis-says-he-was-wrong -about-trump-tower-meeting-n904521

If you want to have some fun, watch Fake News (formally known as CNN) squirming while trying to lie their way out of their false story. Their own on-air personalities (liars) are starting to attack each other.


Sang - 8/29/2018 at 01:08 AM

We all know who the liars are - and it ain't the media - they are reporting what the liars said. It's amazing anybody believes anything from this administration (and all their lawyers).


MartinD28 - 8/29/2018 at 01:40 AM

quote:
quote:
LANNY DAVIS OBLITERATED CNN’S ‘BOMBSHELL’ REPORT ABOUT MICHAEL COHEN AND TRUMP TOWER
• CNN reported on July 27 that Michael Cohen is willing to tell investigators that Donald Trump authorized the infamous Trump Tower meeting with a group of Russians
• But Cohen’s lawyer now says that bombshell report got “mixed up”
• Lanny Davis says that Cohen “does not” have information that Trump had prior knowledge about the meeting

https://dailycaller.com/2018/08/22/lanny-davis-dispute-trump-tower-cohen/


Lanny Davis admits he was source for CNN's Trump Tower story, lied about it on air
Michael Cohen’s attorney has acknowledged being an anonymous source for the disputed CNN Trump Tower story and also admitted lying on TV about his involvement.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/aug/27/lanny-davis-admits-he-was- source-cnn-trump-tower-s/




Sounds like how Trump said he did not know about porn star payments, and then Rudy went on Hannity and said Trump knew about them and repaid them. Then Cohen puts out a tape confirming that Trump discussed the arrangement of porn star payments, and Trump goes on Fox and says he did not know about the payments until much later.

The problem is that Trump and Rudy (and the minority of Americans that still support Trump) want to claim that Cohen and his people have credibility issues for the same behavior in which they are indulging.

I am not arguing that Cohen and Davis should be trusted. I would say anyone who worked as Trump's attorney for so long probably cannot remember how to tell the truth. I would also be skeptical of Davis as a top-dollar political attorney having a firm grip on what is objectively true.

But really... How can the Trump supporters say that clients and their lawyers not having their stories straight on TV is proof that one person is lying and the other should be trusted to shut down an investigation into his own shady practices?

That is what I don't get. Everything bad that anyone else does should be rooted out and questioned and/or punished, but the same actions are okay for Trump and his crew because "everybody does it". I thought he was the "law and order" candidate.


The "law and order candidate" is a catch phrase from an unindicited co-conspirator.

Don loves catch phrases like "Who is going to pay for the wall"? Remember that joke of a rallying point. Whatever happended to that?


adhill58 - 8/29/2018 at 02:09 AM

quote:
quote:
Trump brags about lying to "Fake News CNN". Has Lanny Davis just crept into your hottest fantasies for doing the same thing?



"Trump brags about lying to "Fake News CNN"

Where did you get that crap from?
Or are you just going the Fake News (formally known as CNN) way and lying?



I will take your point here. I guess I conflated "brags about disparaging the media" and "lies to the media". My fault...

Anyway, why is it bad for Cohen and his lawyer to not have their stories straight, but good for Trump and his lawyer to not have their stories straight?


BoytonBrother - 8/29/2018 at 02:24 AM

quote:
Inspector General U.S. Department of Justice Michael E. Horowitz proved the corruption at Obama's FBI.


Why would Trump allow Obama’s proven corruption to go unpunished, and let him walk?

quote:
His next report is on the corruption of Hillary Clinton.


You just stated that Obama’s report led to nothing, so I guess Hillary will walk too.


sckeys - 8/29/2018 at 02:39 AM

quote:
quote:
Inspector General U.S. Department of Justice Michael E. Horowitz proved the corruption at Obama's FBI.


Why would Trump allow Obama’s proven corruption to go unpunished, and let him walk?

quote:
His next report is on the corruption of Hillary Clinton.


You just stated that Obama’s report led to nothing, so I guess Hillary will walk too.


These questions won’t get answered brother. There is all that evidence. Must be a law that sez they can’t punish ex presidents who are Muslim and weren’t born here.


Muleman1994 - 8/29/2018 at 09:15 PM

Wow, the lefties are scared to death that Obama and his failed administration is being exposed for corruption and are now being investigated prior to being prosecuted.

Get your tickets now kids. This is going to be a great show.


BrerRabbit - 8/29/2018 at 10:18 PM

quote:
Get your tickets now kids. This is going to be a great show.


The only person waiting for the imaginary show to start, sitting all alone in the abandoned theater of the absurd.



pops42 - 8/29/2018 at 10:23 PM

quote:
Wow, the lefties are scared to death that Obama and his failed administration is being exposed for corruption and are now being investigated prior to being prosecuted.

Get your tickets now kids. This is going to be a great show.


You are a clown, starring in your own imaginary circus.............pathetic.


Muleman1994 - 8/30/2018 at 12:31 AM

quote:
quote:
Wow, the lefties are scared to death that Obama and his failed administration is being exposed for corruption and are now being investigated prior to being prosecuted.

Get your tickets now kids. This is going to be a great show.


You are a clown, starring in your own imaginary circus.............pathetic.



Pops are you off your meds again?
Check with sckeys.
Apparently he need drugs to think.



sckeys - 8/30/2018 at 01:20 AM



Pops are you off your meds again?
Check with sckeys.
Apparently he need drugs to think.




A side mention from muleman. Cool.


BrerRabbit - 8/30/2018 at 01:25 AM

Don't drop the soap, Jarrod!


Muleman1994 - 8/30/2018 at 02:41 AM

quote:
Don't drop the soap, Jarrod!



Do you mean Jared (Kushner) as in the man both the outgoing and incoming Mexican Presidents acknowledged as integral and wise in the negotiations of the new U.S. - Mexican Trade Deal?


sckeys - 8/30/2018 at 03:24 AM

quote:
quote:
Don't drop the soap, Jarrod!



Do you mean Jared (Kushner) as in the man both the outgoing and incoming Mexican Presidents acknowledged as integral and wise in the negotiations of the new U.S. - Mexican Trade Deal?



Yea same guy that went to the “Russian governments support of Trump” meeting that helped him win.


Muleman1994 - 8/30/2018 at 01:56 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
Don't drop the soap, Jarrod!



Do you mean Jared (Kushner) as in the man both the outgoing and incoming Mexican Presidents acknowledged as integral and wise in the negotiations of the new U.S. - Mexican Trade Deal?



Yea same guy that went to the “Russian governments support of Trump” meeting that helped him win.



Yea, that lie the left keeps pushing that has been proven to be exactly that, a lie.

Donald Trump won the election because he had a message and a plan that has established a strong and growing economy as evidenced by facts.

Two years into the left's lie about Putin/Trump collusion no evidence, no witness, no documents have been produced to support that falsehood.

I guess when you have nothing just lying works for the losers.


BoytonBrother - 8/30/2018 at 02:57 PM

quote:
Donald Trump won the election because he had a message and a plan that has established a strong and growing economy as evidenced by facts.


What a load of garbage. Who would ever believe that you care about the economy? You are middle class till you die. He won because people like you enjoy his intentional hostility and divisiveness. Successful people, on the other hand, who vote for Trump, may get some financial benefits, but they will also eventually invite in their lives the hostility and division that they so willingly accepted. Be careful what you wish for. It might come back to bite you later when you least expect it.


Muleman1994 - 8/30/2018 at 03:26 PM

quote:
quote:
Donald Trump won the election because he had a message and a plan that has established a strong and growing economy as evidenced by facts.


What a load of garbage. Who would ever believe that you care about the economy? You are middle class till you die. He won because people like you enjoy his intentional hostility and divisiveness. Successful people, on the other hand, who vote for Trump, may get some financial benefits, but they will also eventually invite in their lives the hostility and division that they so willingly accepted. Be careful what you wish for. It might come back to bite you later when you least expect it.



Your state of delusion would be more understandable if you made any sense.
Oh well, the angry losers do have that same misconception which keeps them losers.
'


BoytonBrother - 8/30/2018 at 04:25 PM

quote:
Your state of delusion would be more understandable if you made any sense.


Then let me say it in a more elementary way so you can understand: Nobody believes you care about the economy because it’s obvious you don’t have much money to worry about. Trump supporters who do have money to worry about, may enjoy some short term financial benefits, but their support of this orange piece of garbage will hurt them in other ways.


Muleman1994 - 8/30/2018 at 05:32 PM

quote:




Anne Arundel County is a Republican country surrounded by special interest minorities which are oddly represented by white Democrats.

It doesn't matter.
Gov. Hogan (R) will be re-elected.


BrerRabbit - 8/30/2018 at 05:35 PM

quote:
quote:
Don't drop the soap, Jarrod!
quote:
Do you mean Jared (Kushner) . . .



No, I mean Annapolis killer Jarrod, the one who sounds EXACTLY LIKE YOU in this tweet:



Eerie similarity - is that how all you Maryland White Spermracists troll? It is either that or you have a real cozy arrangement with the librarian at the detention center to get internet access.


Muleman1994 - 8/30/2018 at 05:43 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
Don't drop the soap, Jarrod!
quote:
Do you mean Jared (Kushner) . . .



No, I mean Annapolis killer Jarrod, the one who sounds EXACTLY LIKE YOU in this tweet:



Eerie similarity - is that how all you Maryland White Spermracists troll? It is either that or you have a real cozy arrangement with the librarian at the detention center to get internet access.



Spelling is a basic skill thought early in school.
Is that GED still eluding you?

Maybe you can invite Al Sharpton to your GED class:

Al Sharpton:
'In the words of my late friend Aretha Franklin, show some R-E-S-P-I-C-T',



[Edited on 8/30/2018 by Muleman1994]


sckeys - 8/30/2018 at 05:58 PM



Anne Arundel County is a Republican country surrounded by special interest minorities which are oddly represented by white Democrats.



Gotta hate that.


Muleman1994 - 8/30/2018 at 06:03 PM

quote:


Anne Arundel County is a Republican country surrounded by special interest minorities which are oddly represented by white Democrats.



Gotta hate that.



So true.
The lefties do embrace and practice hate.


BrerRabbit - 8/30/2018 at 07:53 PM

quote:
Anne Arundel County is a Republican country surrounded by special interest minorities which are oddly represented by white Democrats.


Interesting and weird response to a reference to the Annapolis murderer. Are you trying to justify your killing spree at the Corrupt Liberal Media Capitol Gazette, Jarrod?


Muleman1994 - 8/31/2018 at 09:57 PM

quote:
quote:
Anne Arundel County is a Republican country surrounded by special interest minorities which are oddly represented by white Democrats.


Interesting and weird response to a reference to the Annapolis murderer. Are you trying to justify your killing spree at the Corrupt Liberal Media Capitol Gazette, Jarrod?





You did not reference the Annapolis murderer. You simply threw out the name Jarrod.

Just like the Bernie supported who shot up the Congressional baseball practice the two appear to be nuts.


BrerRabbit - 8/31/2018 at 10:30 PM


quote:
quote:
quote:
Don't drop the soap, Jarrod!


then your:

quote:
Do you mean Jared (Kushner) . . .?


followed by your:

quote:
Anne Arundel County is a Republican country surrounded by special interest minorities which are oddly represented by white Democrats.

quote:
No, I mean Annapolis killer Jarrod, the one who sounds EXACTLY LIKE YOU in this tweet:



Eerie similarity - is that how all you Maryland White Spermracists troll? It is either that or you have a real cozy arrangement with the librarian at the detention center to get internet access.


quote:
"Anne Arundel County is a Republican country surrounded by special interest minorities which are oddly represented by white Democrats."

Interesting and weird response to a reference to the Annapolis murderer. Are you trying to justify your killing spree at the Corrupt Liberal Media Capitol Gazette, Jarrod?


You did not reference the Annapolis murderer. You simply threw out the name Jarrod.







And then.you replied with some weird jive about Ann Arundel County, which is the location of Annapolis, so you knew exactly who Jarrod is, so you might as well let this thread drop before you get any creepier. As if that is even possible.

"You lost, get over it."

That remark Ramos tweeted is your trademark. You two are cut from the same cloth.






[Edited on 8/31/2018 by BrerRabbit]


Muleman1994 - 9/1/2018 at 01:00 AM

quote:

quote:
quote:
quote:
Don't drop the soap, Jarrod!


then your:

quote:
Do you mean Jared (Kushner) . . .?


followed by your:

quote:
Anne Arundel County is a Republican country surrounded by special interest minorities which are oddly represented by white Democrats.

quote:
No, I mean Annapolis killer Jarrod, the one who sounds EXACTLY LIKE YOU in this tweet:



Eerie similarity - is that how all you Maryland White Spermracists troll? It is either that or you have a real cozy arrangement with the librarian at the detention center to get internet access.


quote:
"Anne Arundel County is a Republican country surrounded by special interest minorities which are oddly represented by white Democrats."

Interesting and weird response to a reference to the Annapolis murderer. Are you trying to justify your killing spree at the Corrupt Liberal Media Capitol Gazette, Jarrod?


You did not reference the Annapolis murderer. You simply threw out the name Jarrod.







And then.you replied with some weird jive about Ann Arundel County, which is the location of Annapolis, so you knew exactly who Jarrod is, so you might as well let this thread drop before you get any creepier. As if that is even possible.

"You lost, get over it."

That remark Ramos tweeted is your trademark. You two are cut from the same cloth.






[Edited on 8/31/2018 by BrerRabbit]




Wrong again.

My Ann Arundel County post came after you posted the tweet.

Seems as if you have the same neurosis as keller and pops.
You might want to wash you hands.



jkeller - 9/1/2018 at 02:04 AM

quote:
quote:

quote:
quote:
quote:
Don't drop the soap, Jarrod!


then your:

quote:
Do you mean Jared (Kushner) . . .?


followed by your:

quote:
Anne Arundel County is a Republican country surrounded by special interest minorities which are oddly represented by white Democrats.

quote:
No, I mean Annapolis killer Jarrod, the one who sounds EXACTLY LIKE YOU in this tweet:



Eerie similarity - is that how all you Maryland White Spermracists troll? It is either that or you have a real cozy arrangement with the librarian at the detention center to get internet access.


quote:
"Anne Arundel County is a Republican country surrounded by special interest minorities which are oddly represented by white Democrats."

Interesting and weird response to a reference to the Annapolis murderer. Are you trying to justify your killing spree at the Corrupt Liberal Media Capitol Gazette, Jarrod?


You did not reference the Annapolis murderer. You simply threw out the name Jarrod.







And then.you replied with some weird jive about Ann Arundel County, which is the location of Annapolis, so you knew exactly who Jarrod is, so you might as well let this thread drop before you get any creepier. As if that is even possible.

"You lost, get over it."

That remark Ramos tweeted is your trademark. You two are cut from the same cloth.






[Edited on 8/31/2018 by BrerRabbit]




Wrong again.

My Ann Arundel County post came after you posted the tweet.

Seems as if you have the same neurosis as keller and pops.
You might want to wash you hands.





Do you have anything to add to the thread or are you just here to troll people? Don't bother answering, we already know.


BrerRabbit - 9/1/2018 at 08:22 PM

OK, let's break this down then:

I quoted you, then commented:

quote:
"Anne Arundel County is a Republican country surrounded by special interest minorities which are oddly represented by white Democrats."

Interesting and weird response to a reference to the Annapolis murderer. Are you trying to justify your killing spree at the Corrupt Liberal Media Capitol Gazette, Jarrod?


Then: You said:
quote:
You did not reference the Annapolis murderer. You simply threw out the name Jarrod.


So, I said:
quote:
you replied with some weird jive about Ann Arundel County, which is the location of Annapolis, so you knew exactly who Jarrod is, so you might as well let this thread drop before you get any creepier. As if that is even possible.

"You lost, get over it."

That remark Ramos tweeted is your trademark. You two are cut from the same cloth.


At which point you said:
quote:
Wrong again.

My Ann Arundel County post came after you posted the tweet.



.....OK, that's just as weird, because the post that contained Jarrod Kushner's Muleski-style tweet CLEARLY REFERENCED THE ANNAPOLIS MURDERER. In fact you were calling him "the shooter" until you adopted my term "murderer" after reading my posts.

If you would, take a quick re-read of the post that had the Annapolis murderer's tweet. It says he was the "Annapolis killer". Then you say your Ann Arundel response was to a post that did not refer to the Annapolis killer. You are totally whacked out either way:

quote:
No, I mean Annapolis killer Jarrod, the one who sounds EXACTLY LIKE YOU in this tweet:




What kind of f*cked up trip are you on?




Muleman1994 - 9/2/2018 at 12:33 AM

quote:
OK, let's break this down then:

I quoted you, then commented:
quote:
"Anne Arundel County is a Republican country surrounded by special interest minorities which are oddly represented by white Democrats."

Interesting and weird response to a reference to the Annapolis murderer. Are you trying to justify your killing spree at the Corrupt Liberal Media Capitol Gazette, Jarrod?


Then: You said:
quote:
You did not reference the Annapolis murderer. You simply threw out the name Jarrod.


So, I said:
quote:
you replied with some weird jive about Ann Arundel County, which is the location of Annapolis, so you knew exactly who Jarrod is, so you might as well let this thread drop before you get any creepier. As if that is even possible.

"You lost, get over it."

That remark Ramos tweeted is your trademark. You two are cut from the same cloth.


At which point you said:
quote:
Wrong again.

My Ann Arundel County post came after you posted the tweet.



.....OK, that's just as weird, because the post that contained Jarrod Kushner's Muleski-style tweet CLEARLY REFERENCED THE ANNAPOLIS MURDERER. In fact you were calling him "the shooter" until you adopted my term "murderer" after reading my posts.

If you would, take a quick re-read of the post that had the Annapolis murderer's tweet. It says he was the "Annapolis killer". Then you say your Ann Arundel response was to a post that did not refer to the Annapolis killer. You are totally whacked out either way:

quote:
No, I mean Annapolis killer Jarrod, the one who sounds EXACTLY LIKE YOU in this tweet:




What kind of f*cked up trip are you on?







Try to follow along.

I followed your "Don't drop the soap, Jarrod!"

With: "Do you mean Jared (Kushner) "

You had not posted anything about the Annapolis Shooter to that point.
After that you just went off the cliff on some other rant.

It helps if you read the posts completely and in order.



[Edited on 9/2/2018 by Muleman1994]


BrerRabbit - 9/2/2018 at 02:32 AM

quote:
Try to follow along.

I followed your "Don't drop the soap, Jarrod!"

With: "Do you mean Jared (Kushner) "

You had not posted anything about the Annapolis Shooter to that point.
After that you just went off the cliff on some other rant.

It helps if you read the posts completely and in order.



Feeble dodge. I'm not going to tell you to try to follow along because you are either incapable or just playing some silly little troll game, or Lord only knows what.

It doesn't matter what order the posts are in, it's weird EITHER WAY:

1. You posted about Ann Arundel, a reference to Annapolis.

2. I commented that was a strange reply in reference to the Annapolis murderer.

3. You said when you posted about Ann Arundel I had not made a reference to.the Annapolis killer, I had only mentioned Jarrod Kushner's first name. THEN YOU SAY YOU POSTED about Ann Arundel AFTER the Annapolis killer tweet post.

You said two opposite things: .
1. There was no reference to Annapolis prior to your Ann Arundel post.
2. Your Ann Arundel post was after the Annapolis killer's tweet post.

Your Ann Arundel post was an even stranger reply if the Annapolis killer had not been mentioned, see you are busted coming and going.

You are either:

A] Full of sh!t
B] Schizo
C] Stupid
D] Hiding something, and trying to deflect this matter into nonsense and only drawing more attention to yourself.

"You lost, get over it."


Muleman1994 - 9/2/2018 at 02:05 PM

quote:
quote:
Try to follow along.

I followed your "Don't drop the soap, Jarrod!"

With: "Do you mean Jared (Kushner) "

You had not posted anything about the Annapolis Shooter to that point.
After that you just went off the cliff on some other rant.

It helps if you read the posts completely and in order.



Feeble dodge. I'm not going to tell you to try to follow along because you are either incapable or just playing some silly little troll game, or Lord only knows what.

It doesn't matter what order the posts are in, it's weird EITHER WAY:

1. You posted about Ann Arundel, a reference to Annapolis.

2. I commented that was a strange reply in reference to the Annapolis murderer.

3. You said when you posted about Ann Arundel I had not made a reference to.the Annapolis killer, I had only mentioned Jarrod Kushner's first name. THEN YOU SAY YOU POSTED about Ann Arundel AFTER the Annapolis killer tweet post.

You said two opposite things: .
1. There was no reference to Annapolis prior to your Ann Arundel post.
2. Your Ann Arundel post was after the Annapolis killer's tweet post.

Your Ann Arundel post was an even stranger reply if the Annapolis killer had not been mentioned, see you are busted coming and going.

You are either:

A] Full of sh!t
B] Schizo
C] Stupid
D] Hiding something, and trying to deflect this matter into nonsense and only drawing more attention to yourself.

"You lost, get over it."



Wrong yet again.

"I had only mentioned Jarrod Kushner's first name"


No, you posted "Don't drop the soap, Jarrod!" which prompted my question.
Jarrod or Jared?

Do try to think clearly and remember what you actually post.

Your neurosis known as the keller and pops syndrome seems to be dominating your mind.




BrerRabbit - 9/2/2018 at 03:03 PM

Another feeble dodge. Your deception is clear. The only effect of any more trolling will be to keep this thread topped as a classic example of your bullsh!t.

"YOU LOST, GET OVER IT."


Muleman1994 - 9/2/2018 at 03:06 PM

quote:
Another feeble dodge. Your deception is clear. The only effect of any more trolling will be to keep this thread topped as a classic example of your bullsh!t.

"YOU LOST, GET OVER IT."





Wrong again.

We won, Donald Trump is President and our country is far better off for it.



BrerRabbit - 9/2/2018 at 03:16 PM

That won't work, some totally unrelated weak little troll about the election isn't going to conceal your massive and highly suspect Ann Arundel/Annapolis killer deception activity.

We can only wonder why you were so anxious to prove that your posts about Ann Arundel/Annapolis were both in response to and not in response to a post referring to the Annapolis killer.

We have been here a few times before, where you get caught talking out of both sides of your mouth and just can't do anything but throw out smoke screens.

You are probably schizo.


All you have managed to do is top this thread again, for any casual reader to continue to wonder at.

"YOU LOST, GET OVER IT."






[Edited on 9/2/2018 by BrerRabbit]


BoytonBrother - 9/2/2018 at 03:41 PM

quote:
We won, Donald Trump is President and our country is far better off for it.


Serious question - did you feel as though you "lost" when Obama was President for 8 years?


BrerRabbit - 9/2/2018 at 03:50 PM

Valid question, Boyntonbrother. However, Muleski just posted that to deflect attention away from further exposure of his Ann Arundel/Annapolis mistake. His defensiveness about this is fascinating.


Muleman1994 - 9/2/2018 at 04:09 PM

quote:
quote:
We won, Donald Trump is President and our country is far better off for it.


Serious question - did you feel as though you "lost" when Obama was President for 8 years?




Our country lost but President Trump is correcting the many mistakes of Obama's failed administration and is Making America Great Again!


BrerRabbit - 9/2/2018 at 04:18 PM

See that BoyntonBrother? Like clockwork, Muleski seized on the election deflection, in a transparent attempt to bury his Annapolis problem.

Let's review:

So, Muleski:

1. You posted about Ann Arundel, a reference to Annapolis.

2. I commented that was a strange reply in reference to the Annapolis murderer.

3. You said when you posted about Ann Arundel I had not made a reference to.the Annapolis killer, I had only mentioned Jarrod Kushner's first name. THEN YOU SAY YOU POSTED about Ann Arundel AFTER the Annapolis killer tweet post.

You said two opposite things: .
1. There was no reference to Annapolis prior to your Ann Arundel post.
2. Your Ann Arundel post was after the Annapolis killer's tweet post.

Your Ann Arundel post was an even stranger reply if the Annapolis killer had not been mentioned, see you are busted coming and going.

You are either:

A] Full of sh!t
B] Schizo
C] Stupid
D] Hiding something, and trying to deflect this matter into nonsense and only drawing more attention to yourself.

"You lost, get over it."




sckeys - 9/2/2018 at 04:26 PM

People aren’t paying attention. Rudy sez “No Collusion”


BoytonBrother - 9/2/2018 at 05:26 PM

quote:
See that BoyntonBrother? Like clockwork, Muleski seized on the election deflection, in a transparent attempt to bury his Annapolis problem.


I've been fascinated by his personality disorders for years.


BoytonBrother - 9/2/2018 at 05:27 PM

quote:
Our country lost


What did it lose?


Muleman1994 - 9/2/2018 at 05:41 PM

quote:
See that BoyntonBrother? Like clockwork, Muleski seized on the election deflection, in a transparent attempt to bury his Annapolis problem.

Let's review:

So, Muleski:

1. You posted about Ann Arundel, a reference to Annapolis.

2. I commented that was a strange reply in reference to the Annapolis murderer.

3. You said when you posted about Ann Arundel I had not made a reference to.the Annapolis killer, I had only mentioned Jarrod Kushner's first name. THEN YOU SAY YOU POSTED about Ann Arundel AFTER the Annapolis killer tweet post.

You said two opposite things: .
1. There was no reference to Annapolis prior to your Ann Arundel post.
2. Your Ann Arundel post was after the Annapolis killer's tweet post.

Your Ann Arundel post was an even stranger reply if the Annapolis killer had not been mentioned, see you are busted coming and going.

You are either:

A] Full of sh!t
B] Schizo
C] Stupid
D] Hiding something, and trying to deflect this matter into nonsense and only drawing more attention to yourself.

"You lost, get over it."







And your post, in this thread, had exactly what to do with this thread?

"Don't drop the soap, Jarrod!"

Trying to distract from the theme of this thread which proves no Russia, no Trump, no Collusion and no Obstruction is the lefties SOP.

Run away from that which destroys your lies.




[Edited on 9/2/2018 by Muleman1994]


BrerRabbit - 9/2/2018 at 06:07 PM


LOL! Topped again! He just can't help himself.

What is he trying to tell us?


Muleman1994 - 9/2/2018 at 07:09 PM

quote:

LOL! Topped again! He just can't help himself.

What is he trying to tell us?



It is real easy.
After you took this tread off the theme I steered it back.

No Russia, No Trump, No collusion, No obstruction.


BrerRabbit - 9/2/2018 at 07:23 PM

quote:
No Russia, No Trump, No collusion, No obstruction.



There you go, little troll, retreat into your nice comfy chant, your little mantra, and maybe it will all just go away for a while. Maybe nobody will see that you have fully outed yourself as a psychotic White Supremacist in these recent threads.

That is all we need to know about you.

Nothing to discuss. You are a disease.


BrerRabbit - 9/2/2018 at 07:31 PM

Ha! Topped it before ya! Let's see, let me guess, I bet you were gonna say

"No russia , no trump , no collusion, no obstruction"

Keep chanting, little troll.


Muleman1994 - 9/2/2018 at 08:22 PM

quote:
Ha! Topped it before ya! Let's see, let me guess, I bet you were gonna say

"No russia , no trump , no collusion, no obstruction"

Keep chanting, little troll.



Keep running away from the theme of this tread.
It is easy to see that it is an important thread since the lefties are scared and consistently change the subject.



Muleman1994 - 9/2/2018 at 08:24 PM

The Clinton shyster, embarrassed when caught lying is desperate to cover for Fake news (formally known as CNN)


Lanny Davis says he's to blame, not CNN, for controversy over Trump-Russia meeting story

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/02/lanny-davis-says-hes-to-blame-no t-cnn-for-controversy-over-trump-russia-meeting-story.html


Chain - 9/2/2018 at 08:38 PM

And yet another cooperating witness comes forward late this week. Steve Patten admits funneling foreign money with ties to a Russian national to Trump Inauguration:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/washington-consultant-fo r-ukraine-party-set-to-plead-guilty-to-violating-lobbyist-disclosure-law/20 18/08/31/172cf2c8-ad23-11e8-a8d7-0f63ab8b1370_story.html?noredirect=on& utm_term=.5a89174eb8a1

Yeah, there's absolutely NO Russian connection to the Trump syndicate....


Muleman1994 - 9/2/2018 at 08:44 PM

quote:
And yet another cooperating witness comes forward late this week. Steve Patten admits funneling foreign money with ties to a Russian national to Trump Inauguration:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/washington-consultant-fo r-ukraine-party-set-to-plead-guilty-to-violating-lobbyist-disclosure-law/20 18/08/31/172cf2c8-ad23-11e8-a8d7-0f63ab8b1370_story.html?noredirect=on& utm_term=.5a89174eb8a1

Yeah, there's absolutely NO Russian connection to the Trump syndicate....




1.) The Washington Post is corrupt liberal media and will print anything they can spin against President Trump.

2.) Another plea deal with no details. A prosecutor give out plea deals when they can't hang legitimate charges.

Your desperation is pathetic.

No Russia , no Trump , no collusion, no obstruction





BrerRabbit - 9/2/2018 at 09:27 PM

I bet you are relieved you got that buried, got a little close to home with the Annapolis stuff , didn't it?


Muleman1994 - 9/2/2018 at 09:40 PM

quote:
I bet you are relieved you got that buried, got a little close to home with the Annapolis stuff , didn't it?



Still running away from the theme of the thread.
Is it because it is outside of your depth or you just can't stay on topic.


BrerRabbit - 9/2/2018 at 09:47 PM

Calm down, your secret is safe.



Muleman1994 - 9/2/2018 at 10:07 PM

No Russia , no Trump , no collusion, no obstruction


BrerRabbit - 9/2/2018 at 10:12 PM

LOL. Kinda reminds me of Dorothy in Wizard of Oz chanting, "There's no place like home."


Chain - 9/2/2018 at 10:45 PM

quote:
quote:
And yet another cooperating witness comes forward late this week. Steve Patten admits funneling foreign money with ties to a Russian national to Trump Inauguration:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/washington-consultant-fo r-ukraine-party-set-to-plead-guilty-to-violating-lobbyist-disclosure-law/20 18/08/31/172cf2c8-ad23-11e8-a8d7-0f63ab8b1370_story.html?noredirect=on& utm_term=.5a89174eb8a1

Yeah, there's absolutely NO Russian connection to the Trump syndicate....




1.) The Washington Post is corrupt liberal media and will print anything they can spin against President Trump.

2.) Another plea deal with no details. A prosecutor give out plea deals when they can't hang legitimate charges.

Your desperation is pathetic.

No Russia , no Trump , no collusion, no obstruction



Your automated reply is pretty tired...Surely the Russian disinformation machine is better than that, eh Comrade? It really is time for a new phrase, Bot Boy...

[Edited on 9/2/2018 by Chain]


Muleman1994 - 9/2/2018 at 11:26 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
And yet another cooperating witness comes forward late this week. Steve Patten admits funneling foreign money with ties to a Russian national to Trump Inauguration:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/washington-consultant-fo r-ukraine-party-set-to-plead-guilty-to-violating-lobbyist-disclosure-law/20 18/08/31/172cf2c8-ad23-11e8-a8d7-0f63ab8b1370_story.html?noredirect=on& utm_term=.5a89174eb8a1

Yeah, there's absolutely NO Russian connection to the Trump syndicate....




1.) The Washington Post is corrupt liberal media and will print anything they can spin against President Trump.

2.) Another plea deal with no details. A prosecutor give out plea deals when they can't hang legitimate charges.

Your desperation is pathetic.

No Russia , no Trump , no collusion, no obstruction



Your automated reply is pretty tired...Surely the Russian disinformation machine is better than that, eh Comrade? It really is time for a new phrase, Bot Boy...

[Edited on 9/2/2018 by Chain]




The truth is well worth repeating.

No Russia , no Trump , no collusion, no obstruction


LeglizHemp - 9/3/2018 at 12:46 AM

tic

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-investigations_us_5b85861 de4b0511db3d229d7


Muleman1994 - 9/3/2018 at 12:54 AM

quote:
tic

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-investigations_us_5b85861 de4b0511db3d229d7



Not surprising.

The Mueller probe has found nothing tying Russia and Candidate/President Trump to... anything.

Did you notice in the opinion piece "from four different investigative bodies" yet not one is identified. That is what is called "sources" and are just made up.

The opinion piece is also a re-hash of fake news pieces that have resulted in nothing.

Lots of words that amount to... nothing.


BrerRabbit - 9/3/2018 at 03:28 AM

Arf. . . .

Toc.


2112 - 9/3/2018 at 03:53 AM

quote:
quote:
tic

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-investigations_us_5b85861 de4b0511db3d229d7



Not surprising.

The Mueller probe has found nothing tying Russia and Candidate/President Trump to... anything.

Did you notice in the opinion piece "from four different investigative bodies" yet not one is identified. That is what is called "sources" and are just made up.

The opinion piece is also a re-hash of fake news pieces that have resulted in nothing.

Lots of words that amount to... nothing.




How do you get around wearing blinders all day long? Don't you get tired of bumping into walls and falling into ditches?


StratDal - 9/3/2018 at 12:55 PM

quote:
quote:
tic

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-investigations_us_5b85861 de4b0511db3d229d7



Not surprising.

The Mueller probe has found nothing tying Russia and Candidate/President Trump to... anything.

Did you notice in the opinion piece "from four different investigative bodies" yet not one is identified. That is what is called "sources" and are just made up.

The opinion piece is also a re-hash of fake news pieces that have resulted in nothing.

Lots of words that amount to... nothing.




Is the investigation completed? Last I heard it wasn't. I've been watching a number of college football games. I could have missed it.


Muleman1994 - 9/3/2018 at 03:37 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
tic

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-investigations_us_5b85861 de4b0511db3d229d7



Not surprising.

The Mueller probe has found nothing tying Russia and Candidate/President Trump to... anything.

Did you notice in the opinion piece "from four different investigative bodies" yet not one is identified. That is what is called "sources" and are just made up.

The opinion piece is also a re-hash of fake news pieces that have resulted in nothing.

Lots of words that amount to... nothing.




Is the investigation completed? Last I heard it wasn't. I've been watching a number of college football games. I could have missed it.




After two years the politically motivated investigation has produced nothing.

What started as a probe into Russian meddling into the 2016 election, the left and the corrupt liberal media portrayed it as a Putin/Trump collusion investigation. That quickly morphed into a Russia/Trump collusion investigation.

The political bias of Mueller’s “team” has ben exposed but censored by the corrupt liberal media. Mueller had 17 prosecutors/attorneys on his team with 13 of them Democrats who donated heavily to the Clinton campaign, two independents and two who will not disclose their political affiliation.

Mueller lost his lead investigator Peter Strzok and his mistress after their text messaging exposed their bias which along with other violations at the FBI lead to his termination.

Mueller tried to tie President Trump’s attorney Michael Cohen to the so-called Russia collusion but failed.

With no evidence, no witnesses and no documents the investigation has produced nothing.

The left is desperate, so they try to keep this hoax alive but now even the corrupt liberal media pays it little ink.






[Edited on 9/3/2018 by Muleman1994]


BoytonBrother - 9/3/2018 at 03:41 PM

And why do you care about all of this? I'd stop paying attention to it if I were you. If you focus on your work and your family, none of it has to bother you.....but for some reason you seek it out.

[Edited on 9/3/2018 by BoytonBrother]


sckeys - 9/3/2018 at 05:15 PM

Just to be clear, they colluded with Russians.


Muleman1994 - 9/3/2018 at 05:29 PM

quote:
Just to be clear, they colluded with Russians.


Who is "they"?

The Donald Trump campaign did not "collude" with the Russians but if they had, collusion is not a crime so what is your point?

Just to be clear.



BrerRabbit - 9/3/2018 at 05:40 PM

Why did you hijack this thread from Cohen's convictions to Trump and Russia two posts in? The original post had nothing to do with Russia. Cohen remotely connected with his agreement to assist Mueller, but that was not mentioned in the OP.


Try to stay on topic, Jarrod.


Muleman1994 - 9/3/2018 at 06:41 PM

quote:
Why did you hijack this thread from Cohen's convictions to Trump and Russia two posts in? The original post had nothing to do with Russia. Cohen remotely connected with his agreement to assist Mueller, but that was not mentioned in the OP.


Try to stay on topic, Jarrod.




I did not take this off topic. I was answering someone's question.

"with his agreement to assist Mueller"

That is a lie. Documented in his deal Cohen is under no obligation to cooperate with the prosecutors at SDNY or the Mueller investigation.

Try to keep up and be accurate.


sckeys - 9/3/2018 at 06:57 PM

Watch cnn muleman, you’ll get caught up on what’s happenin.


Muleman1994 - 9/3/2018 at 07:17 PM

quote:
Watch cnn muleman, you’ll get caught up on what’s happenin.



That Fake News network is circling the drain with ratings lower than the Cartoon Network and HGTV.
AT&T is now trying to decide what to do with the embarrassment they now own.


BrerRabbit - 9/3/2018 at 07:45 PM

FOX NEWS: Cohen 'more than happy' to talk to Mueller, tell 'all that he knows,' lawyer says

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/08/22/cohen-more-than-happy-to-talk-to -mueller-and-say-all-that-knows-lawyer-says.html


Muleman1994 - 9/3/2018 at 07:53 PM

quote:
FOX NEWS: Cohen 'more than happy' to talk to Mueller, tell 'all that he knows,' lawyer says

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/08/22/cohen-more-than-happy-to-talk-to -mueller-and-say-all-that-knows-lawyer-says.html



That was what his lawyer Lanny Davis said and then admitted he lied.

Lanny Davis's mea culpa and open admission that he lied has been well reported.

What is the matter son. Fake News not inform you or have you missed the many times it was posted right here while you were trying to divert from the theme of this thread?




BrerRabbit - 9/3/2018 at 08:04 PM

I only follow Fox News.That article was from Fox News from 10 days ago. So Cohen is not going to talk to Mueller?


Muleman1994 - 9/3/2018 at 08:19 PM

quote:
I only follow Fox News.That article was from Fox News from 10 days ago. So Cohen is not going to talk to Mueller?



In Cohen's deal it is specified that he is under no obligation to cooperate with the SDNY or the Mueller investigation.

The Fox News article was published before Lanny Davis publicly admitted he lied.
The details were all posted in this thread.


BrerRabbit - 9/3/2018 at 08:27 PM

I'll be honest. I don't give a sh!t. The rats are eating each other alive in the gutters of Babylon. They are all bad people, both sides.


sckeys - 9/3/2018 at 08:30 PM

There isn’t anything fake about an email from a hostile govt in support of Trump and the kgb leader answered yes. You are correct in that no arrests have came from this meeting yet and we will see what happens. As for “any campaign would do this” to deflect, name them. Not the usual thinking as in, “well, Trump paid strippers off but Obama was so bad in my mind that he must have yada, yada”


Muleman1994 - 9/3/2018 at 08:36 PM

quote:
There isn’t anything fake about an email from a hostile govt in support of Trump and the kgb leader answered yes. You are correct in that no arrests have came from this meeting yet and we will see what happens. As for “any campaign would do this” to deflect, name them. Not the usual thinking as in, “well, Trump paid strippers off but Obama was so bad in my mind that he must have yada, yada”



Every campaign and incoming administration has met with Russia officials as well as many other countries allied or not for over 50 years.

You may want to familiarize yourself with actual history.


BrerRabbit - 9/3/2018 at 08:39 PM

American honesty and integrity died with John McCain.


Muleman1994 - 9/3/2018 at 09:01 PM

quote:
American honesty and integrity died with John McCain.


Pessimists are usually miserable people.
There is another approach.


BrerRabbit - 9/3/2018 at 09:03 PM

No thanks.


LeglizHemp - 9/3/2018 at 09:50 PM

toc

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/03/politics/donald-trump-jeff-sessions-justice- department/index.html


Muleman1994 - 9/3/2018 at 10:32 PM

quote:
toc

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/03/politics/donald-trump-jeff-sessions-justice- department/index.html


Fake news (formally known as CNN)?
Are you really that desperate you need to go to the dumpster?


jkeller - 9/3/2018 at 10:34 PM

quote:
quote:
toc

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/03/politics/donald-trump-jeff-sessions-justice- department/index.html


Fake news (formally known as CNN)?
Are you really that desperate you need to go to the dumpster?



You don’t have to read it on CNN. You can go to Twitter and read the actual tweets. I hope you understand how this is obstruction of justice. No, you probably don’t.


Muleman1994 - 9/3/2018 at 10:50 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
toc

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/03/politics/donald-trump-jeff-sessions-justice- department/index.html


Fake news (formally known as CNN)?
Are you really that desperate you need to go to the dumpster?



You don’t have to read it on CNN. You can go to Twitter and read the actual tweets. I hope you understand how this is obstruction of justice. No, you probably don’t.



The actual tweet is far from the far-left opinion crap spun in the Fake News article.
Understandable though.
You are too stupid to separate facts from opinion.


jkeller - 9/3/2018 at 10:58 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
toc

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/03/politics/donald-trump-jeff-sessions-justice- department/index.html


Fake news (formally known as CNN)?
Are you really that desperate you need to go to the dumpster?



You don’t have to read it on CNN. You can go to Twitter and read the actual tweets. I hope you understand how this is obstruction of justice. No, you probably don’t.



The actual tweet is far from the far-left opinion crap spun in the Fake News article.
Understandable though.
You are too stupid to separate facts from opinion.



The article has a screenshot of the actual tweet.

You are just here to troll people. You aren’t interested in the truth or any ideology. You just want to make personal attacks. I hope they make you feel better. But it just seems to frustrate you even more.

I don’t really care. Do u?


Muleman1994 - 9/3/2018 at 11:15 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
toc

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/03/politics/donald-trump-jeff-sessions-justice- department/index.html


Fake news (formally known as CNN)?
Are you really that desperate you need to go to the dumpster?



You don’t have to read it on CNN. You can go to Twitter and read the actual tweets. I hope you understand how this is obstruction of justice. No, you probably don’t.



The actual tweet is far from the far-left opinion crap spun in the Fake News article.
Understandable though.
You are too stupid to separate facts from opinion.



The article has a screenshot of the actual tweet.

You are just here to troll people. You aren’t interested in the truth or any ideology. You just want to make personal attacks. I hope they make you feel better. But it just seems to frustrate you even more.

I don’t really care. Do u?



"The article has a screenshot of the actual tweet. " wrapped in an opinion piece of crap.
Obviously written for people like you that are incapable of separating fact from opinion.

Keep trying there son.

The U.S. and President Trump keep winning.


jkeller - 9/3/2018 at 11:28 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
toc

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/03/politics/donald-trump-jeff-sessions-justice- department/index.html


Fake news (formally known as CNN)?
Are you really that desperate you need to go to the dumpster?



You don’t have to read it on CNN. You can go to Twitter and read the actual tweets. I hope you understand how this is obstruction of justice. No, you probably don’t.



The actual tweet is far from the far-left opinion crap spun in the Fake News article.
Understandable though.
You are too stupid to separate facts from opinion.



The article has a screenshot of the actual tweet.

You are just here to troll people. You aren’t interested in the truth or any ideology. You just want to make personal attacks. I hope they make you feel better. But it just seems to frustrate you even more.

I don’t really care. Do u?



"The article has a screenshot of the actual tweet. " wrapped in an opinion piece of crap.
Obviously written for people like you that are incapable of separating fact from opinion.

Keep trying there son.

The U.S. and President Trump keep winning.



The article was not an opinion piece. It reported the tweet and reaction to it by members of both parties.

You were too lazy to read it. All you want to do is be a troll and attack people who haven’t done anything to you. That is pretty sad.


Muleman1994 - 9/3/2018 at 11:39 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
toc

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/03/politics/donald-trump-jeff-sessions-justice- department/index.html


Fake news (formally known as CNN)?
Are you really that desperate you need to go to the dumpster?



You don’t have to read it on CNN. You can go to Twitter and read the actual tweets. I hope you understand how this is obstruction of justice. No, you probably don’t.



The actual tweet is far from the far-left opinion crap spun in the Fake News article.
Understandable though.
You are too stupid to separate facts from opinion.



The article has a screenshot of the actual tweet.

You are just here to troll people. You aren’t interested in the truth or any ideology. You just want to make personal attacks. I hope they make you feel better. But it just seems to frustrate you even more.

I don’t really care. Do u?



"The article has a screenshot of the actual tweet. " wrapped in an opinion piece of crap.
Obviously written for people like you that are incapable of separating fact from opinion.

Keep trying there son.

The U.S. and President Trump keep winning.



The article was not an opinion piece. It reported the tweet and reaction to it by members of both parties.

You were too lazy to read it. All you want to do is be a troll and attack people who haven’t done anything to you. That is pretty sad.



Still crying uh?
Pathetic.


LeglizHemp - 9/4/2018 at 05:08 PM

tic

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/04/politics/bob-woodward-book-donald-trump-fear /index.html


BrerRabbit - 9/4/2018 at 08:56 PM

Wow. Thanks for the heads up on Woodward's book. It is worse than I imagined. This administration is like the Jerry Springer Show for the whole planet. Glad Woodward has applied his talent to this travesty. Looking forward to his new book very much.


pops42 - 9/4/2018 at 09:16 PM

quote:
tic

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/04/politics/bob-woodward-book-donald-trump-fear /index.html
Fantastic!


Muleman1994 - 9/5/2018 at 01:15 AM

Perfect.
A far-left political activist writes a load of crap and promotes it on Fake News

A new tabloid for lefties.


jkeller - 9/5/2018 at 01:44 AM

quote:
Perfect.
A far-left political activist writes a load of crap and promotes it on Fake News

A new tabloid for lefties.




Bob Woodward? You really don't know very much, do you?


pops42 - 9/5/2018 at 03:15 AM

quote:
Perfect.
A far-left political activist writes a load of crap and promotes it on Fake News

A new tabloid for lefties.


With each passing day, you get dumber, and dumber.


BrerRabbit - 9/5/2018 at 03:38 AM

Woodward bad.


Muleman1994 - 9/5/2018 at 03:41 PM

Not surprisingly not one of the lefties here, salivating over the latest tabloid, has mentioned that Woodward never actually talked to any of the people he claims said this or that. He says he asked people what those people might have said.

That is yellow journalism.




jkeller - 9/5/2018 at 04:02 PM

quote:
Not surprisingly not one of the lefties here, salivating over the latest tabloid, has mentioned that Woodward never actually talked to any of the people he claims said this or that. He says he asked people what those people might have said.

That is yellow journalism.






He recorded every conversation.

This guy won 2 Pulitzers and has been a respected journalist for over 50 years. I'll take his word over a lying grifter who was put into office by a foreign power.


Muleman1994 - 9/5/2018 at 04:13 PM

quote:
quote:
Not surprisingly not one of the lefties here, salivating over the latest tabloid, has mentioned that Woodward never actually talked to any of the people he claims said this or that. He says he asked people what those people might have said.

That is yellow journalism.






He recorded every conversation.

This guy won 2 Pulitzers and has been a respected journalist for over 50 years. I'll take his word over a lying grifter who was put into office by a foreign power.



"He recorded every conversation.'
- If they exist why is he hiding them?


"has been a respected journalist" by the far-left extremists except when he went after Obama.


MartinD28 - 9/5/2018 at 04:36 PM

quote:
quote:
Not surprisingly not one of the lefties here, salivating over the latest tabloid, has mentioned that Woodward never actually talked to any of the people he claims said this or that. He says he asked people what those people might have said.

That is yellow journalism.







He recorded every conversation.

This guy won 2 Pulitzers and has been a respected journalist for over 50 years. I'll take his word over a lying grifter who was put into office by a foreign power.


But Trump is (or was) pals with the guy that runs The National Enquirer. Isn't that an equivalency of a Pulitzer Prize journalist?


Muleman1994 - 9/5/2018 at 04:46 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
Not surprisingly not one of the lefties here, salivating over the latest tabloid, has mentioned that Woodward never actually talked to any of the people he claims said this or that. He says he asked people what those people might have said.

That is yellow journalism.







He recorded every conversation.

This guy won 2 Pulitzers and has been a respected journalist for over 50 years. I'll take his word over a lying grifter who was put into office by a foreign power.


But Trump is (or was) pals with the guy that runs The National Enquirer. Isn't that an equivalency of a Pulitzer Prize journalist?



It was The National Enquirer that took down John Edwards for banging a mistress while his wife was dying of cancer.


jkeller - 9/5/2018 at 04:56 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
Not surprisingly not one of the lefties here, salivating over the latest tabloid, has mentioned that Woodward never actually talked to any of the people he claims said this or that. He says he asked people what those people might have said.

That is yellow journalism.







He recorded every conversation.

This guy won 2 Pulitzers and has been a respected journalist for over 50 years. I'll take his word over a lying grifter who was put into office by a foreign power.


But Trump is (or was) pals with the guy that runs The National Enquirer. Isn't that an equivalency of a Pulitzer Prize journalist?



It was The National Enquirer that took down John Edwards for banging a mistress while his wife was dying of cancer.



Try to stay on topic.


Muleman1994 - 9/5/2018 at 04:58 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
Not surprisingly not one of the lefties here, salivating over the latest tabloid, has mentioned that Woodward never actually talked to any of the people he claims said this or that. He says he asked people what those people might have said.

That is yellow journalism.







He recorded every conversation.

This guy won 2 Pulitzers and has been a respected journalist for over 50 years. I'll take his word over a lying grifter who was put into office by a foreign power.


But Trump is (or was) pals with the guy that runs The National Enquirer. Isn't that an equivalency of a Pulitzer Prize journalist?



It was The National Enquirer that took down John Edwards for banging a mistress while his wife was dying of cancer.



Try to stay on topic.



I did not take this thread off topic.
Try to learn to follow the conversation.


jkeller - 9/5/2018 at 05:00 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
Not surprisingly not one of the lefties here, salivating over the latest tabloid, has mentioned that Woodward never actually talked to any of the people he claims said this or that. He says he asked people what those people might have said.

That is yellow journalism.







He recorded every conversation.

This guy won 2 Pulitzers and has been a respected journalist for over 50 years. I'll take his word over a lying grifter who was put into office by a foreign power.


But Trump is (or was) pals with the guy that runs The National Enquirer. Isn't that an equivalency of a Pulitzer Prize journalist?



It was The National Enquirer that took down John Edwards for banging a mistress while his wife was dying of cancer.



Try to stay on topic.



I did not take this thread off topic.
Try to learn to follow the conversation.





The conversation was only mildly about the NE. It wasn't about John Edwards.


BoytonBrother - 9/5/2018 at 05:07 PM

Disgraceful that weak and ineffectiveTrump is letting criminals Obama and Hillary walk all over him, and walk free. I can’t believe he’s being this soft. Still no charges. Trump is letting the Democrats take him down, how pathetic.


LeglizHemp - 9/5/2018 at 08:19 PM

TOC

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/05/opinion/trump-white-house-anonymous-resi stance.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage

Opinion
I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration
I work for the president but like-minded colleagues and I have vowed to thwart parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations.

Sept. 5, 2018

The Times today is taking the rare step of publishing an anonymous Op-Ed essay. We have done so at the request of the author, a senior official in the Trump administration whose identity is known to us and whose job would be jeopardized by its disclosure. We believe publishing this essay anonymously is the only way to deliver an important perspective to our readers. We invite you to submit a question about the essay or our vetting process here.

President Trump is facing a test to his presidency unlike any faced by a modern American leader.

It’s not just that the special counsel looms large. Or that the country is bitterly divided over Mr. Trump’s leadership. Or even that his party might well lose the House to an opposition hellbent on his downfall.

The dilemma — which he does not fully grasp — is that many of the senior officials in his own administration are working diligently from within to frustrate parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations.

I would know. I am one of them.

To be clear, ours is not the popular “resistance” of the left. We want the administration to succeed and think that many of its policies have already made America safer and more prosperous.

But we believe our first duty is to this country, and the president continues to act in a manner that is detrimental to the health of our republic.

That is why many Trump appointees have vowed to do what we can to preserve our democratic institutions while thwarting Mr. Trump’s more misguided impulses until he is out of office.

The root of the problem is the president’s amorality. Anyone who works with him knows he is not moored to any discernible first principles that guide his decision making.

Although he was elected as a Republican, the president shows little affinity for ideals long espoused by conservatives: free minds, free markets and free people. At best, he has invoked these ideals in scripted settings. At worst, he has attacked them outright.

In addition to his mass-marketing of the notion that the press is the “enemy of the people,” President Trump’s impulses are generally anti-trade and anti-democratic.

Don’t get me wrong. There are bright spots that the near-ceaseless negative coverage of the administration fails to capture: effective deregulation, historic tax reform, a more robust military and more.

But these successes have come despite — not because of — the president’s leadership style, which is impetuous, adversarial, petty and ineffective.

From the White House to executive branch departments and agencies, senior officials will privately admit their daily disbelief at the commander in chief’s comments and actions. Most are working to insulate their operations from his whims.

Meetings with him veer off topic and off the rails, he engages in repetitive rants, and his impulsiveness results in half-baked, ill-informed and occasionally reckless decisions that have to be walked back.

“There is literally no telling whether he might change his mind from one minute to the next,” a top official complained to me recently, exasperated by an Oval Office meeting at which the president flip-flopped on a major policy decision he’d made only a week earlier.

The erratic behavior would be more concerning if it weren’t for unsung heroes in and around the White House. Some of his aides have been cast as villains by the media. But in private, they have gone to great lengths to keep bad decisions contained to the West Wing, though they are clearly not always successful.

It may be cold comfort in this chaotic era, but Americans should know that there are adults in the room. We fully recognize what is happening. And we are trying to do what’s right even when Donald Trump won’t.

The result is a two-track presidency.

Take foreign policy: In public and in private, President Trump shows a preference for autocrats and dictators, such as President Vladimir Putin of Russia and North Korea’s leader, Kim Jong-un, and displays little genuine appreciation for the ties that bind us to allied, like-minded nations.

Astute observers have noted, though, that the rest of the administration is operating on another track, one where countries like Russia are called out for meddling and punished accordingly, and where allies around the world are engaged as peers rather than ridiculed as rivals.

On Russia, for instance, the president was reluctant to expel so many of Mr. Putin’s spies as punishment for the poisoning of a former Russian spy in Britain. He complained for weeks about senior staff members letting him get boxed into further confrontation with Russia, and he expressed frustration that the United States continued to impose sanctions on the country for its malign behavior. But his national security team knew better — such actions had to be taken, to hold Moscow accountable.

This isn’t the work of the so-called deep state. It’s the work of the steady state.

Given the instability many witnessed, there were early whispers within the cabinet of invoking the 25th Amendment, which would start a complex process for removing the president. But no one wanted to precipitate a constitutional crisis. So we will do what we can to steer the administration in the right direction until — one way or another — it’s over.

The bigger concern is not what Mr. Trump has done to the presidency but rather what we as a nation have allowed him to do to us. We have sunk low with him and allowed our discourse to be stripped of civility.

Senator John McCain put it best in his farewell letter. All Americans should heed his words and break free of the tribalism trap, with the high aim of uniting through our shared values and love of this great nation.

We may no longer have Senator McCain. But we will always have his example — a lodestar for restoring honor to public life and our national dialogue. Mr. Trump may fear such honorable men, but we should revere them.

There is a quiet resistance within the administration of people choosing to put country first. But the real difference will be made by everyday citizens rising above politics, reaching across the aisle and resolving to shed the labels in favor of a single one: Americans.

The writer is a senior official in the Trump administration.


Muleman1994 - 9/5/2018 at 08:24 PM

^
An anonymous Op-Ed essay published by the NYT.

Are you now dumpster-diving for tabloid trash?


pops42 - 9/5/2018 at 08:30 PM

quote:
^
An anonymous Op-Ed essay published by the NYT.

Are you now dumpster-diving for tabloid trash?

Say's the imbie who gets his "news" from fox news.


sckeys - 9/5/2018 at 08:32 PM

Muleman knows he can get some truth from his favorite C double N.


BoytonBrother - 9/5/2018 at 08:44 PM

quote:
An anonymous Op-Ed essay published by the NYT.

Are you now dumpster-diving for tabloid trash?


You'd be more effective if you established credibility. I doubt you even care about politics. I doubt you hate Obama and I doubt you love Trump. You just love to fight. Whatever floats your boat. For what it's worth, I think you are interesting when you provide more substance, rather than the predictable one-liners that we heard the day before in the media. Get back to the better Muleman.


Muleman1994 - 9/5/2018 at 08:55 PM

quote:
quote:
^
An anonymous Op-Ed essay published by the NYT.

Are you now dumpster-diving for tabloid trash?

Say's the imbie who gets his "news" from fox news.



Yes, Fox News is one source of factual information and is well respected.
That is a major reason why they are by far #1 in ratings and no one else is even close.

Fake News (formally known as CNN) is somewhere around 25th.


BrerRabbit - 9/5/2018 at 09:08 PM

For sure, good ol Fox News. I first heard about this from Fox today.

Fox News: WH official pens anonymous NY Times op-ed calling Trump 'anti-democratic,' 'petty and ineffective'

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/05/wh-official-pens-anonymous-ny-ti mes-op-ed-calling-trump-anti-democratic-petty-and-ineffective.html

Nowhere in the Fox article is there any question of the veracity of the piece.


Muleman1994 - 9/5/2018 at 09:16 PM

quote:
For sure, good ol Fox News. I first heard about this from Fox today.

Fox News: WH official pens anonymous NY Times op-ed calling Trump 'anti-democratic,' 'petty and ineffective'

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/05/wh-official-pens-anonymous-ny-ti mes-op-ed-calling-trump-anti-democratic-petty-and-ineffective.html

Nowhere in the Fox article is there any question of the veracity of the piece.



"anonymous claims to be a WH official" and you bought it.
Sucker.

Dumpster-diving for tabloid trash is a sad way to spend your day.


BoytonBrother - 9/5/2018 at 09:21 PM

Obama and Hillary are 100% free with clean records, while Trump is about be a disgraced President like Nixon. Stinks, don't it!!!!


Bhawk - 9/5/2018 at 09:41 PM

quote:
Yes, Fox News is one source of factual information and is well respected.
That is a major reason why they are by far #1 in ratings and no one else is even close.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/05/wh-official-pens-anonymous-ny-ti mes-op-ed-calling-trump-anti-democratic-petty-and-ineffective.html

Dumpster-diving for tabloid trash is a sad way to spend your day.




MartinD28 - 9/5/2018 at 09:50 PM

quote:
Obama and Hillary are 100% free with clean records, while Trump is about be a disgraced President like Nixon. Stinks, don't it!!!!


When Mueller's report is released and as more time passes, history will see Nixon as a choir boy compared to the guy who put children in cages, is a friend of white nationalists, alienates allies, got played like a fool by Putin and KJU, groped women, paid off a Playboy Bunny for an affair after the birth of his young son, paid off a stripper for an affair when he was married to Melania, and put his unqualified daughter and son in law into senior advisor positions, and the list goes on.


Muleman1994 - 9/5/2018 at 09:50 PM

Only a gutless coward uses anonymous sources.


BrerRabbit - 9/5/2018 at 11:13 PM

quote:
quote:
For sure, good ol Fox News. I first heard about this from Fox today.

Fox News: WH official pens anonymous NY Times op-ed calling Trump 'anti-democratic,' 'petty and ineffective'

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/05/wh-official-pens-anonymous-ny-ti mes-op-ed-calling-trump-anti-democratic-petty-and-ineffective.html

Nowhere in the Fox article is there any question of the veracity of the piece.


quote:
anonymous claims to be a WH official" and you bought it.
Sucker.

Dumpster-diving for tabloid trash is a sad way to spend your day.



Fox News: They report, I decide.

[Edited on 9/5/2018 by BrerRabbit]


Muleman1994 - 9/6/2018 at 12:57 AM

quote:
quote:
quote:
For sure, good ol Fox News. I first heard about this from Fox today.

Fox News: WH official pens anonymous NY Times op-ed calling Trump 'anti-democratic,' 'petty and ineffective'

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/05/wh-official-pens-anonymous-ny-ti mes-op-ed-calling-trump-anti-democratic-petty-and-ineffective.html

Nowhere in the Fox article is there any question of the veracity of the piece.


quote:
anonymous claims to be a WH official" and you bought it.
Sucker.

Dumpster-diving for tabloid trash is a sad way to spend your day.



Fox News: They report, I decide.

[Edited on 9/5/2018 by BrerRabbit]



Fox News reported the story as did many.
Thinking people are able to spot crap.


pops42 - 9/6/2018 at 01:06 AM

quote:
Only a gutless coward uses anonymous sources.


You are a gutless coward, klanazi1994,


Muleman1994 - 9/6/2018 at 04:03 PM

quote:
quote:
Only a gutless coward uses anonymous sources.


You are a gutless coward, klanazi1994,



And pops steps in a big pile again.
Sucker.


LeglizHemp - 9/13/2018 at 11:54 PM

Tic

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/13/politics/manafort-plea/index.html


LeglizHemp - 9/14/2018 at 12:58 AM

toc

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/13/politics/mcraven-pentagon-advisory-board-tru mp/index.html


LeglizHemp - 9/14/2018 at 01:37 PM

TIC

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/14/paul-manafort-to-plead-guilty-as -part-plea-deal-with-special-counsel.html

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/14/politics/paul-manafort-guilty-plea/index.htm l

[Edited on 9/14/2018 by LeglizHemp]


LeglizHemp - 9/14/2018 at 04:00 PM

TOC

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/14/politics/paul-manafort-guilty-plea/index.htm l

Paul Manafort enters cooperation agreement with Justice Department


MartinD28 - 9/14/2018 at 04:38 PM

quote:
TOC

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/14/politics/paul-manafort-guilty-plea/index.htm l

Paul Manafort enters cooperation agreement with Justice Department



You can bet that Manafort knows plenty and will sell out Dictator Don so he can save his own a$$. Of course Trump undersold how long Manafort was associated with the campaign & his role - in typical Trump fashion. Waiting to hear Trump tell us that Manafort was actually an assistant to the coffee boy.

In the end they all sell out in the name of self preservation.

Don Jr. & Jared in the on deck circle.

Pardons on the way?


IF - 9/14/2018 at 04:41 PM


BoytonBrother - 9/14/2018 at 06:50 PM

quote:
When Mueller's report is released and as more time passes, history will see Nixon as a choir boy compared to the guy who put children in cages, is a friend of white nationalists, alienates allies, got played like a fool by Putin and KJU, groped women, paid off a Playboy Bunny for an affair after the birth of his young son, paid off a stripper for an affair when he was married to Melania, and put his unqualified daughter and son in law into senior advisor positions, and the list goes on.


And spent the past 2 years bashing our country and its leaders while praising foreign adversaries...all of these things are undeniable, which begs the question why anyone would want this person to lead our country when there were 18 other Republican candidates to choose from - but they went with the above.

Several people on this site believe it was the right's response to personal attacks by Obama and liberals. In their minds, Obama lead liberal America to demonize conservatives by calling them homophobic and racist. The right had to respond, so in an effort to prove them wrong, they elected Trump. Doesn't that make the left correct in their assessment? Whatever message they were trying to send was an epic fail. He'll be gone in a few years, whether 1, 2, or 6 more, and his supporters will be hiding and denying they ever voted for him. It'll be sad to watch.


DOVETAIL - 9/14/2018 at 07:57 PM

quote:
quote:
TOC

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/14/politics/paul-manafort-guilty-plea/index.htm l

Paul Manafort enters cooperation agreement with Justice Department



You can bet that Manafort knows plenty and will sell out Dictator Don so he can save his own a$$. Of course Trump undersold how long Manafort was associated with the campaign & his role - in typical Trump fashion. Waiting to hear Trump tell us that Manafort was actually an assistant to the coffee boy.

In the end they all sell out in the name of self preservation.

Don Jr. & Jared in the on deck circle.

Pardons on the way?

Flippers everywhere...Hope goober & Muleman got theirs on....or their galoshes!!!??!!!


OriginalGoober - 9/15/2018 at 12:04 PM



I will certainly not support a President guilty of conspiring with Russia, but so far this Mueller investigation has uncovered a tax cheat, shady loan applications and a two-week stay at one of the cozier fed pens. If there is no real substance here and Mueller's witchhunt uncovers some real estate deals that were shady BFD. THere are more kickbacks and inflated costs and palm greasing in building a library or shopping mall in your local zipcode.


MartinD28 - 9/15/2018 at 12:54 PM

quote:


I will certainly not support a President guilty of conspiring with Russia, but so far this Mueller investigation has uncovered a tax cheat, shady loan applications and a two-week stay at one of the cozier fed pens. If there is no real substance here and Mueller's witchhunt uncovers some real estate deals that were shady BFD. THere are more kickbacks and inflated costs and palm greasing in building a library or shopping mall in your local zipcode.


Why do you think Mueller cut a deal with Manafort, former campaign manager for Trump? Do you think it's because Mueller felt sorry for Manafort? Manafort knows PLENTY on Trump & the campaign ties to Russia - follow the money. Another reason Trump most likely refuses to release his tax returns like previous presidents have done. He has things to hide. Do you think he's been transparent like his predecessors? If not why do you think so?

Face it goob - You'd have never used terms like "Crooked Hillary or "witch hunt" unless you have become a parrot and repeat stale lines of a man child who is in way over his head as president.

When Mueller, a methodically operating investigator & a professional drops his findings, you may want to think about rescinding all of the regurgitated silly nicknames and incorrect statements posted to date.


LeglizHemp - 9/15/2018 at 07:22 PM

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/gop-donor-les-wexner-announces-departu re-from-republican-party-after-obama-visit_us_5b9d455ae4b046313fbbbdf1


pops42 - 9/15/2018 at 08:12 PM

TIC https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/22/us/politics/trump-cohen-impeachment.html


sckeys - 9/16/2018 at 10:24 PM

Manafort bad.


BrerRabbit - 9/17/2018 at 12:08 AM

Manafort crack. Manafort weak.


sckeys - 9/17/2018 at 03:59 AM

I am interested to see how it shakes out. There’s just too many connections for this stuff to be chance. The RNC making those changes with regard to Russia is puzzling too. We hear so much “what about Obama?” But if he would have had these skeletons fox would have went wild. I think we are in for a long wait. Who’s the next “flipper” to be weak and crack?


BrerRabbit - 9/17/2018 at 04:05 AM

Anyone ever stop and consider why the Russians needed Trump for US prez?

In a nutshell - Black Sea oil. Ukraine controlled access to plenty until the Russians grabbed Crimea. The main pipes go thru Ukraine. The US and Europe, via Ukraine, had a chance at some, not all, control of access and flow. Then who's in Ukraine working as strategist to keep pro-Russia govt in power until the revolution in 2014? Manafort. Who throws America into a fog of idiocy and lets the Russians tighten their stranglehold? Trump.

The damage is done. Trump might be of further use on smaller stuff, but Moscow got what it was after. Trump will get beaucoup kickbacks and huge deals with Russia when he leaves office.

And you all thought Trump was dumb! And whoever thought he was smart thought so for the wrong reasons.

Just moving the pieces around the board, that's what I saw. Probably way more than that in there, but I bet I'm barking up the right tree at least.

Looks to me like he sold us down the river.

(and before I get the standard "you got that from the corrupt liberal media" bullsh!t - right or wrong I put this together on my own)

[Edited on 9/17/2018 by BrerRabbit]


BrerRabbit - 9/17/2018 at 04:08 AM

haha sry sckeys, i was reworking my post. Yeah, man, who knows. If a country boy like me who only gets his news from Fox on AM radio can see that much, good bet there is a whole lot more going on. Big moves.


sckeys - 9/17/2018 at 04:13 AM

Oh you will get the lib media flap. It’s an easy answer. I think the answers will come from that famous tower meeting.


sckeys - 9/17/2018 at 04:17 AM

I listen to a local station like that. If they had gotten some juice as good as this on Obama it would have thrown breakers in my house.


BrerRabbit - 9/17/2018 at 04:22 AM

They report. I decide. The main thing is dont buy any prefab ideas - enough folks thinking for themselves and America will get through this same as always. Digging in on the hardline, lib or con, is a trap.


sckeys - 9/17/2018 at 04:27 AM

quote:
They report. I decide. The main thing is dont buy any prefab ideas - enough folks thinking for themselves and America will get through this same as always. Digging in on the hardline, lib or con, is a trap.


This is true but the reality these days is different. Or is it? It is harshly divided but this didn’t just recently start.


BrerRabbit - 9/17/2018 at 04:30 AM

Been in the works since WW2 I think, then ramped up with LBJ, the Kennedy coup, Vietnam, some kind of slow strangle on democracy,, feels like.


BrerRabbit - 9/17/2018 at 04:33 AM

Sure as sh!t dont need to be joining up with Russia. They will cook us.


sckeys - 9/17/2018 at 04:39 AM

I’m curious to know what these flippers are gonna say. I think Jr goes to the clink and gets a pardon. He really is In the rare position to say “my dad is more powerful than the feds” and mean it.


BrerRabbit - 9/17/2018 at 04:42 AM

quote:
The RNC making those changes with regard to Russia is puzzling too.


Didn't know about that - what changes?


sckeys - 9/17/2018 at 04:46 AM

quote:
quote:
The RNC making those changes with regard to Russia is puzzling too.


Didn't know about that - what changes?


When his campaign changed the platform to be more “russia friendly” sez some. It was back during the convention I think.


BrerRabbit - 9/17/2018 at 04:55 AM


Something is definitely up with Russia. Those "Rather Be Russian Than Democrat" clowns are pretty scary. Where the f did a slogan like that come from?


sckeys - 9/17/2018 at 05:03 AM

quote:

Something is definitely up with Russia. Those "Rather Be Russian Than Democrat" clowns are pretty scary. Where the f did a slogan like that come from?


It may not be immediately but I think republicans will have a hard time answering for this type of stuff at some point.


MartinD28 - 9/17/2018 at 11:34 AM

quote:
quote:

Something is definitely up with Russia. Those "Rather Be Russian Than Democrat" clowns are pretty scary. Where the f did a slogan like that come from?


It may not be immediately but I think republicans will have a hard time answering for this type of stuff at some point.


Some may feel free to open up in November if the House flips, as it will give them some cover. However there will still be those chasing the dog in the WH. In the end, self preservation is the name of their game. They could care less about "we the people".


sckeys - 9/17/2018 at 12:20 PM

“we the people”? What about that tormented minority known as the Whipping Post forum member? Who stands for those forgotten few?


BoytonBrother - 9/17/2018 at 04:39 PM

quote:
Something is definitely up with Russia. Those "Rather Be Russian Than Democrat" clowns are pretty scary. Where the f did a slogan like that come from?


Simple. It wasn't below Trump to capitalize on the segment of America that longs for a white Christian ruling class. The second he questioned Obama's heritage and called for a Mexican border wall to stop the rapists and thugs, that segment immediately worshipped him like a God. By wink-winking to the world that he is fighting for upper-class white Christian America, he effectively defined any of his American obstacles as the enemy......not the foreign adversary who attacked America. He has been broadcasting this to the world over and over and over again, which is rule #1 when trying to brainwash the weak. Hence, "I'd rather be Russian than Democrat". And for the record, the right is outraged by providing healthcare for the needy, but ok with an American president intentionally brainwashing a portion of America to turn on its own people, and root for the enemy. After this clown is gone, how will Republicans explain/defend/rationalize this? Because the economy is decent? Please. Lots of Presidents had good economies without sleeping with the enemy.


BrerRabbit - 9/17/2018 at 08:56 PM

The White Spermracists worship Russia. They regard it is the last unspoiled habitat of their endangered species. Could be some strong connects there, to the massive White Nationalist Spermracist trend in Russia:

David Duke: "Russia is the key to White survival."

Neo-Nazi Matthew Heimbach: "Putin is the leader, really, of the anti-globalist forces around the world" (meaning anti-Jewish) . . .also this - "Russia is our most powerful ally." (meaning ally of White Spermracists) Heimbach was an organizer of Unite the White in Charlottesville.

Neo Nazi Richard Spencer (another organizer of Unite the White rally):
"Russia is the sole White power in the world."






[Edited on 9/17/2018 by BrerRabbit]


OriginalGoober - 9/17/2018 at 11:54 PM

quote:


Simple. It wasn't below Trump to capitalize on the segment of America that longs for a white Christian ruling class. The second he questioned Obama's heritage and called for a Mexican border wall to stop the rapists and thugs, that segment immediately worshipped him like a God. By wink-winking to the world that he is fighting for upper-class white Christian America, he effectively defined any of his American obstacles as the enemy......not the foreign adversary who attacked America. He has been broadcasting this to the world over and over and over again, which is rule #1 when trying to brainwash the weak. Hence, "I'd rather be Russian than Democrat". And for the record, the right is outraged by providing healthcare for the needy, but ok with an American president intentionally brainwashing a portion of America to turn on its own people, and root for the enemy. After this clown is gone, how will Republicans explain/defend/rationalize this? Because the economy is decent? Please. Lots of Presidents had good economies without sleeping with the enemy.



REASON # 569: Brainwashed trailer park -dwelling deplorables put on their Skoal jackets and assembled en masse on election day to thwart Crooked Hillary.


2112 - 9/18/2018 at 01:45 AM

quote:
The White Spermracists worship Russia. They regard it is the last unspoiled habitat of their endangered species. Could be some strong connects there, to the massive White Nationalist Spermracist trend in Russia:

David Duke: "Russia is the key to White survival."

Neo-Nazi Matthew Heimbach: "Putin is the leader, really, of the anti-globalist forces around the world" (meaning anti-Jewish) . . .also this - "Russia is our most powerful ally." (meaning ally of White Spermracists) Heimbach was an organizer of Unite the White in Charlottesville.

Neo Nazi Richard Spencer (another organizer of Unite the White rally):
"Russia is the sole White power in the world."


[Edited on 9/17/2018 by BrerRabbit]


I'd be happy to pitch in for some one way tickets for them to move to Russia if they promise to take Cheeto-in-Chief with them.


BoytonBrother - 9/18/2018 at 01:04 PM

quote:
REASON # 569: Brainwashed trailer park -dwelling deplorables put on their Skoal jackets and assembled en masse on election day to thwart Crooked Hillary.


Crazy that Trump let her walk free,right? How weak of him. And if it’s crooked behavior that grinds your gears, you must really be steaming about the indicted criminals within the Trump administration.


sckeys - 9/18/2018 at 03:06 PM

quote:
quote:
REASON # 569: Brainwashed trailer park -dwelling deplorables put on their Skoal jackets and assembled en masse on election day to thwart Crooked Hillary.


Crazy that Trump let her walk free,right? How weak of him. And if it’s crooked behavior that grinds your gears, you must really be steaming about the indicted criminals within the Trump administration.



The FEMA guy is on the ropes now. Talk about swamp...


BrerRabbit - 9/18/2018 at 11:19 PM

quote:
Talk about swamp...




was lookin for nik nik nik swamp, only could find nik nik nik fut fut fut indians



LeglizHemp - 9/24/2018 at 04:07 PM

UH OH

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/24/politics/rod-rosenstein/index.html

https://www.businessinsider.com/if-trump-fires-rod-rosenstein-noel-francisc o-2018-9

[Edited on 9/24/2018 by LeglizHemp]


LeglizHemp - 10/9/2018 at 02:11 PM

Tic

Nikki Haley Resigns


MartinD28 - 10/9/2018 at 02:53 PM

quote:
Tic

Nikki Haley Resigns


No surprise here. She probably had enough of Trump sucking up to dictators and despots.

Probably a chance she may primary Trump in next election.


sckeys - 10/9/2018 at 02:58 PM

She’s firmly in his camp as the entire state is. Have a look at the level of education and rampant racism here and it’s no surprise.

[Edited on 10/9/2018 by sckeys]


BoytonBrother - 10/11/2018 at 08:04 PM

Uh oh.


Chief Justice Roberts Requests Tenth Circuit To Investigate Kavanaugh Ethics Questions

While the Republican leadership celebrates the seating of Brett Kavanaugh as a Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roberts yesterday requested the Tenth Circuit to review more than twelve ethics complaints that have been made against Kavanaugh. The complaints concern Kavanaugh’s behavior at the Senate Judiciary Committee on September 27.


pops42 - 10/11/2018 at 08:27 PM

quote:
Uh oh.


Chief Justice Roberts Requests Tenth Circuit To Investigate Kavanaugh Ethics Questions

While the Republican leadership celebrates the seating of Brett Kavanaugh as a Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roberts yesterday requested the Tenth Circuit to review more than twelve ethics complaints that have been made against Kavanaugh. The complaints concern Kavanaugh’s behavior at the Senate Judiciary Committee on September 27.


MartinD28 - 10/11/2018 at 09:54 PM

quote:
Uh oh.


Chief Justice Roberts Requests Tenth Circuit To Investigate Kavanaugh Ethics Questions

While the Republican leadership celebrates the seating of Brett Kavanaugh as a Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, Chief Justice Roberts yesterday requested the Tenth Circuit to review more than twelve ethics complaints that have been made against Kavanaugh. The complaints concern Kavanaugh’s behavior at the Senate Judiciary Committee on September 27.


We can probably predict right now what the end result of that will be.


Muleman1994 - 10/17/2018 at 08:31 PM

Leftover Obama trash arrested for leaking classified Government documents to reporter.

Treasury employee charged with leaking financial info on Trump campaign officials, Russians
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/treasury-employee-arrested-on-suspicion-of -leaking-financial-info-on-trump-campaign-officials-russians

Natalie Mayflower Sours Edwards: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know
https://heavy.com/news/2018/10/natalie-mayflower-sours-edwards/


BoytonBrother - 10/18/2018 at 01:13 PM

These stories were proven to be fake. You fell for it again!


LeglizHemp - 10/18/2018 at 09:39 PM

Toc

https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/18/politics/john-kelly-john-bolton-immigration/ index.html


This thread come from : Hittin' The Web with the Allman Brothers Band
http://allmanbrothersband.com/

Url of this website:
http://allmanbrothersband.com//modules.php?op=modload&name=XForum&file=viewthread&fid=127&tid=146998