Thread: Rahm Emanuel wants to bring in foreign mercenaries to control black violence in Chicago

Muleman1994 - 12/16/2017 at 09:58 PM

Rahm Emanuel wants to bring in foreign mercenaries to control black violence in Chicago

Unable to stop crime and black genocide in Chicago, Rahm Emanuel wants to bring in foreign troops:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYr1weMHoNY



pops42 - 12/16/2017 at 10:21 PM

Wit-less imbecile!. fox is a joke, like YOU.

[Edited on 12/16/2017 by pops42]


Sang - 12/17/2017 at 12:26 AM

Living in a Chicago suburb, I know this is bullsh!t........

[Edited on 12/17/2017 by Sang]


Chain - 12/17/2017 at 01:55 AM

Little Donnie Trump pledged to end the violence in Chicago.....He hasn't done that yet? He'll most likely get to it right after he makes the Mexican government pay for that wall he pledged to build.


Muleman1994 - 12/19/2017 at 05:19 PM

quote:
Little Donnie Trump pledged to end the violence in Chicago.....He hasn't done that yet? He'll most likely get to it right after he makes the Mexican government pay for that wall he pledged to build.



President Trump never "pledged to end the violence in Chicago"

You have been caught lying again.


Muleman1994 - 12/19/2017 at 05:20 PM

Bring in the U.N. to solve Chicago 'genocide,' Boykin says
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chicagoinc/ct-met-boykin-un-1215-chicago -inc-20171214-story.html


Chicago Politician Requests Child-raping UN Troops ... in America
https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/27597-chicago-politician-r equests-child-raping-un-troops-in-america


Boykin asks United Nations for help fighting Chicago violence
http://abc7chicago.com/politics/boykin-asks-un-for-help-fighting-chicago-vi olence/2780474/


Chicago wants UN peacekeepers
http://republicbroadcasting.org/news/chicago-wants-un-peacekeepers/


BrerRabbit - 12/19/2017 at 05:35 PM


2112 - 12/19/2017 at 06:38 PM

quote:



Hey, I'm with Mule here. That's not a pledge to end violence in Chicago. What Trump was saying is that if the violence doesn't stop, he is going to send in the Feds to observe the elections in Chicago. You know, to discourage Democrats from voting and make sure the Russian voting machines are working properly. You simply misunderstood that Tweet.


Bhawk - 12/19/2017 at 07:06 PM

Everyone on the South Side has a gun, so...what's the problem?


BoytonBrother - 12/19/2017 at 07:59 PM

Mule, those are all fake news links. You fell for it again!


gina - 12/19/2017 at 09:33 PM

Deploying UN peacekeepers is the precursor to martial law. UN Peacekeepers are an idea that the new world order came up with. You do not want them on your streets, because after that comes the Humvees and the get on the busses to the FEMA camps. United Nations means they can be any nationality, like those Chinese troops people have seen in Colorado. Remember when foreign troops trained on US soil during Jade Helm just in case there was civil unrest that the National Guard could not control?


Chain - 12/19/2017 at 09:44 PM

quote:
quote:
Little Donnie Trump pledged to end the violence in Chicago.....He hasn't done that yet? He'll most likely get to it right after he makes the Mexican government pay for that wall he pledged to build.



President Trump never "pledged to end the violence in Chicago"

You have been caught lying again.



It's a figure of speech. You shouldn't take things so literal, Mr. Dobbs.


gina - 12/19/2017 at 10:32 PM


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfxosqQFpYM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unhgQwJ1HK4




[Edited on 12/19/2017 by gina]


Muleman1994 - 12/19/2017 at 10:50 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
Little Donnie Trump pledged to end the violence in Chicago.....He hasn't done that yet? He'll most likely get to it right after he makes the Mexican government pay for that wall he pledged to build.



President Trump never "pledged to end the violence in Chicago"

You have been caught lying again.



It's a figure of speech. You shouldn't take things so literal, Mr. Dobbs.



You misrepresented what President Trump actually said.
You lied.

President Trump has sent in "The "Feds" are working in Chicago to stop the plea bargaining by the Chicago Attorney General to drop murders committed using an illegal weapon down to misdemeanors or just dropping the cases completely.

The Democrats who run Chicago have the responsibility for public safety. They have intentionally failed and thousands of black people have been murdered.

That may be acceptable to the left but it is not acceptable especially to the mothers who have to bury their children.




2112 - 12/20/2017 at 12:40 AM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
Little Donnie Trump pledged to end the violence in Chicago.....He hasn't done that yet? He'll most likely get to it right after he makes the Mexican government pay for that wall he pledged to build.



President Trump never "pledged to end the violence in Chicago"

You have been caught lying again.



It's a figure of speech. You shouldn't take things so literal, Mr. Dobbs.



You misrepresented what President Trump actually said.
You lied.

President Trump has sent in "The "Feds" are working in Chicago to stop the plea bargaining by the Chicago Attorney General to drop murders committed using an illegal weapon down to misdemeanors or just dropping the cases completely.

The Democrats who run Chicago have the responsibility for public safety. They have intentionally failed and thousands of black people have been murdered.

That may be acceptable to the left but it is not acceptable especially to the mothers who have to bury their children.



I've got to wonder how long it took you to make up that story. It's a stupid unbelievable story, but imaginative all the same.


Jerry - 12/20/2017 at 01:29 AM

quote:
Mule, those are all fake news links. You fell for it again!


The Chicago Tribune is fake news? ABC 7 is fake?

Seems like BoytonBro didn't want to check out the links.


BoytonBrother - 12/20/2017 at 02:42 AM

Nah, just following our leader, Jerry.


Sang - 12/20/2017 at 02:49 AM

So, just more lies from Mule - this guy Boykin is a Cook County Commissioner - so show me, as the headline on this thread says, where Rahm Emanuel asked for anything........ all those articles are about a county commissioner - not a representative of the city....


Muleman1994 - 12/20/2017 at 03:06 PM

quote:
So, just more lies from Mule - this guy Boykin is a Cook County Commissioner - so show me, as the headline on this thread says, where Rahm Emanuel asked for anything........ all those articles are about a county commissioner - not a representative of the city....


This story has been widely reported in Chicago and got a boost to the national level when Rahm Emanuel endorsed the call to bring in foreign mercenaries to combat crime in his city.
Of course the corrupt liberal media didn't cover it so you would be yet again uninformed.

Do you far-lefties have a quota for how many black people you want murdered?


porkchopbob - 12/20/2017 at 03:38 PM

quote:
Do you far-lefties have a quota for how many black people you want murdered?


Wow, Mule, way out of line. We can all respectfully disagree without being despicable.


BoytonBrother - 12/20/2017 at 04:29 PM

quote:
Wow, Mule, way out of line. We can all respectfully disagree without being despicable.


Mule is not capable of this because he is too low-class. He’s a step above a deranged homeless person. He comes on this site to pour over his rage and misery. A mature adult would apologize - let’s see what he chooses.


Muleman1994 - 12/20/2017 at 04:44 PM

quote:
quote:
Do you far-lefties have a quota for how many black people you want murdered?


Wow, Mule, way out of line. We can all respectfully disagree without being despicable.


The Democrats are responsible for public safety in the black people's killing zones and have proven they are incapable and unwilling to save black lives.

You support the Democrats.

Just how many black people do you want murdered?



BoytonBrother - 12/20/2017 at 04:52 PM

quote:
The Democrats are responsible


And the Republicans can’t do anything about it with their power.


Muleman1994 - 12/20/2017 at 04:57 PM

quote:
quote:
The Democrats are responsible


And the Republicans can’t do anything about it with their power.




Are you acknowledging that the Democrats are incapable and unwilling to meet their public safety responsibility?

Are you calling for Federal Troops to be deployed on the streets of the Democrat's ghettos?



porkchopbob - 12/20/2017 at 05:04 PM

quote:
The Democrats are responsible for public safety in the black people's killing zones and have proven they are incapable and unwilling to save black lives.

You support the Democrats.

Just how many black people do you want murdered?


I'm not a Democrat, Mule, and clearly neither Democrats nor Republicans, nor anyone here, wants anyone murdered. To say such a thing, while demonstrating a gross misunderstanding of non-partisan urban violence, illustrates why no one can ever take you seriously. Maybe go for a walk, get out from under your bridge, and get some fresh air.

[Edited on 12/20/2017 by porkchopbob]


BoytonBrother - 12/20/2017 at 05:12 PM

quote:
Are you acknowledging that the Democrats are incapable and unwilling to meet their public safety responsibility?


No.

quote:
Are you calling for Federal Troops to be deployed on the streets of the Democrat's ghettos?


No. I’m wondering why a Republican-controlled government, and the supposed greatest President ever, can’t influence.


BrerRabbit - 12/20/2017 at 05:36 PM

quote:
Just how many black people do you want murdered?


You are insane.


Muleman1994 - 12/20/2017 at 05:36 PM

quote:
quote:
Are you acknowledging that the Democrats are incapable and unwilling to meet their public safety responsibility?


No.

quote:
Are you calling for Federal Troops to be deployed on the streets of the Democrat's ghettos?


No. I’m wondering why a Republican-controlled government, and the supposed greatest President ever, can’t influence.



The Democrats control Chicago.


Muleman1994 - 12/20/2017 at 05:37 PM

Chicago 2017:

Year to Date (2017 thru 12/20)

Shot & Killed: 612
Shot & Wounded: 2881
Total Shot: 3493
Total Homicides: 662




[Edited on 12/20/2017 by Muleman1994]


jkeller - 12/20/2017 at 05:42 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
Are you acknowledging that the Democrats are incapable and unwilling to meet their public safety responsibility?


No.

quote:
Are you calling for Federal Troops to be deployed on the streets of the Democrat's ghettos?


No. I’m wondering why a Republican-controlled government, and the supposed greatest President ever, can’t influence.



The Democrats control Chicago.



The Republicans control the country.


BrerRabbit - 12/20/2017 at 05:42 PM

quote:
Just how many black people do you want murdered?


You are insane.


Muleman1994 - 12/20/2017 at 05:54 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
Are you acknowledging that the Democrats are incapable and unwilling to meet their public safety responsibility?


No.

quote:
Are you calling for Federal Troops to be deployed on the streets of the Democrat's ghettos?


No. I’m wondering why a Republican-controlled government, and the supposed greatest President ever, can’t influence.



The Democrats control Chicago.



The Republicans control the country.


So you support a Federal takeover of Chicago?


jkeller - 12/20/2017 at 06:00 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
Are you acknowledging that the Democrats are incapable and unwilling to meet their public safety responsibility?


No.

quote:
Are you calling for Federal Troops to be deployed on the streets of the Democrat's ghettos?


No. I’m wondering why a Republican-controlled government, and the supposed greatest President ever, can’t influence.



The Democrats control Chicago.



The Republicans control the country.


So you support a Federal takeover of Chicago?



Nice overreach. The Republicans refuse to address gun control. That would be a nice start.


Muleman1994 - 12/20/2017 at 06:04 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
Are you acknowledging that the Democrats are incapable and unwilling to meet their public safety responsibility?


No.

quote:
Are you calling for Federal Troops to be deployed on the streets of the Democrat's ghettos?


No. I’m wondering why a Republican-controlled government, and the supposed greatest President ever, can’t influence.



The Democrats control Chicago.



The Republicans control the country.


So you support a Federal takeover of Chicago?



Nice overreach. The Republicans refuse to address gun control. That would be a nice start.


The Democrats have refused to offer any legislation that would protect The American People's while getting illegal guns out of the hands of criminals.


jkeller - 12/20/2017 at 06:20 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
Are you acknowledging that the Democrats are incapable and unwilling to meet their public safety responsibility?


No.

quote:
Are you calling for Federal Troops to be deployed on the streets of the Democrat's ghettos?


No. I’m wondering why a Republican-controlled government, and the supposed greatest President ever, can’t influence.



The Democrats control Chicago.



The Republicans control the country.


So you support a Federal takeover of Chicago?



Nice overreach. The Republicans refuse to address gun control. That would be a nice start.


The Democrats have refused to offer any legislation that would protect The American People's while getting illegal guns out of the hands of criminals.



The Democrats have proposed, among other things, a ban on bump stocks. The Republicans have refused to consider it. They are too busy offering thoughts and prayers after the latest mass shooting.


Sang - 12/20/2017 at 06:21 PM

quote:
quote:
So, just more lies from Mule - this guy Boykin is a Cook County Commissioner - so show me, as the headline on this thread says, where Rahm Emanuel asked for anything........ all those articles are about a county commissioner - not a representative of the city....


This story has been widely reported in Chicago and got a boost to the national level when Rahm Emanuel endorsed the call to bring in foreign mercenaries to combat crime in his city.
Of course the corrupt liberal media didn't cover it so you would be yet again uninformed.





I call bullsh!t again....this is from WGN, a Chicago station:

Boykin isn’t getting specific about what exactly he thinks the United Nations can do. But he says city and state leaders must make a total commitment to eliminating poverty, proving job opportunities and improving schools.

That has been Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s approach, and he points to what he calls signs of success: new companies are hiring in Chicago, the school system is improving and the number of shootings in the Englewood neighborhood are down.


"There was a story the other day in the paper about people feeling different about what’s happening," Emanuel said. "For all of us that know what Englewood has stood for before, it’s different and it’s the residents saying it."

As of Wednesday morning, 814 fewer people have been shot and there have been 624 homicides in Chicago, down 15 percent compared to 734 on this date last year.

But carjackings have surged in 2017. Chicago police say they're aggressively responding and making more arrests, but it's a difficult problem because police say most of the carjackings involve juvenile offenders who are treated differently in the justice system.

Asked for a headline to frame the story of Chicago violence in 2017, Emanuel said the city plans on adding a thousand cops, and taking care of kids with 115,000 in after-school programs, 31,000 in summer jobs and close to 7,500 in mentoring programs.

"The goal is to make sure that we’re not only reducing gun violence, but then giving our kids access to the type of mentoring and support so that they have a different choice in life," Emanuel said.

The mayor has his approach to dealing with gun violence -- and most city leaders have bought in.

http://wgntv.com/2017/12/13/local-official-will-ask-the-united-nations-to-h elp-solve-chicagos-gun-violence/


BoytonBrother - 12/20/2017 at 06:22 PM

The Republicans have refused to offer any legislation that would protect The American People's while getting illegal guns out of the hands of criminals.


jkeller - 12/20/2017 at 06:26 PM

quote:
The Republicans have refused to offer any legislation that would protect The American People's while getting illegal guns out of the hands of criminals.


Yeah, 6th grade English was difficult for him. All three times.


BrerRabbit - 12/20/2017 at 07:40 PM

quote:
Just how many black people do you want murdered?


Can you rephrase this in a less sociopathic manner? I think what you are trying to say is anyone who isn't an extreme right winger tacitly supports violent racism and genocide, am I reading this correctly?


Bhawk - 12/20/2017 at 10:59 PM

This thread has turned quite gross.


gina - 12/21/2017 at 12:21 AM

quote:
quote:
So, just more lies from Mule - this guy Boykin is a Cook County Commissioner - so show me, as the headline on this thread says, where Rahm Emanuel asked for anything........ all those articles are about a county commissioner - not a representative of the city....


This story has been widely reported in Chicago and got a boost to the national level when Rahm Emanuel endorsed the call to bring in foreign mercenaries to combat crime in his city.
Of course the corrupt liberal media didn't cover it so you would be yet again uninformed.

Do you far-lefties have a quota for how many black people you want murdered?



I don't think it's the lefties (whomever they are) that want the carnage to start. I think it's those stubborn Democrats that want the violence so that they can get people in an uproar, point fingers at Trump, have the Black Lives Matter etc. groups join together, march on Washington and demand Trump fix everything right away before there is civil war or revolution. There are high level groups and people who want America destabilized, because then they can put in place a government of THEIR choosing, so they use these groups like pawns to do their dirty work.

I think former First Lady, Michelle Obama could do some work with the dis-enfranchised of Chicago. She lived there, she knows what goes on and what the problems are. I think she is a strong positive role model that people could identify with, and if the crap hit the fan, she'd be able to hold her own, get on a public address system and ask 'you people want a can of whoop ass?' inner city people know what that is and they will stop fighting amongst themselves when they realize the real enemy is poverty, not each other.


[Edited on 12/21/2017 by gina]


Jerry - 12/22/2017 at 02:20 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
Are you acknowledging that the Democrats are incapable and unwilling to meet their public safety responsibility?


No.

quote:
Are you calling for Federal Troops to be deployed on the streets of the Democrat's ghettos?


No. I’m wondering why a Republican-controlled government, and the supposed greatest President ever, can’t influence.



The Democrats control Chicago.



The Republicans control the country.


So you support a Federal takeover of Chicago?



Nice overreach. The Republicans refuse to address gun control. That would be a nice start.


What legislation would you like to see passed that the criminals will follow?


BoytonBrother - 12/22/2017 at 03:38 PM

quote:
What legislation would you like to see passed that the criminals will follow?


The definition of a criminal is someone who ignores legislation. Inner-city gang violence isn't a gun issue. It's a socioeconomic issue, which isn't about Republican v Democrat because neither side has been able to improve that in my lifetime. As long as there is poverty, there will be inner-city crime. That's the byproduct of a free capitalist society.

The legislation that will achieve the goal, would be to place a top priority on funding under-developed communities with high-paying teaching jobs instead of $30k/year. Inner-city dysfunction is passed on from generation to generation because there are no leaders to show them a better way. Currently, there are no leaders at home, and no leaders at these dispicable schools because their low-paying teaching salaries attract the bottom of the barrel. No leadership anywhere in their life. Start by investing in the teachers so they can have positive role models that inspire them to go work and start a career. But unfortunately, every city teacher I've known speaks about how they simply don't have any money or resources. They often times spend their own money to initiate school projects. Sad!

[Edited on 12/22/2017 by BoytonBrother]


Jerry - 12/26/2017 at 12:46 AM

quote:
quote:
What legislation would you like to see passed that the criminals will follow?


The definition of a criminal is someone who ignores legislation. Inner-city gang violence isn't a gun issue. It's a socioeconomic issue, which isn't about Republican v Democrat because neither side has been able to improve that in my lifetime. As long as there is poverty, there will be inner-city crime. That's the byproduct of a free capitalist society.

The legislation that will achieve the goal, would be to place a top priority on funding under-developed communities with high-paying teaching jobs instead of $30k/year. Inner-city dysfunction is passed on from generation to generation because there are no leaders to show them a better way. Currently, there are no leaders at home, and no leaders at these dispicable schools because their low-paying teaching salaries attract the bottom of the barrel. No leadership anywhere in their life. Start by investing in the teachers so they can have positive role models that inspire them to go work and start a career. But unfortunately, every city teacher I've known speaks about how they simply don't have any money or resources. They often times spend their own money to initiate school projects. Sad!

[Edited on 12/22/2017 by BoytonBrother]


Figures I have seen indicate that in 1965, 25% of black children were born out of wedlock, and in 2015 70% of black children were born out of wedlock. The 1965 date is important since welfare put in the "marriage penalty". A non-married female with children got almost the same benefits as if she were married with no income. If the husband worked, benefits went down. Thus fathers left the family, even if they still put money into family funds. The nuclear family of the poor was thus broken up by economics.
The trend was then started, and carried on for more than 40 years. Bill Clinton changed welare with the TAFN Act (Temporary Assistance to Needy Families).

Now, while all the suggestions you gave are pretty good, remember cost of living in different areas of the country. A starting salary of 30K in Ga is a fairly decent salary, while in NYC it might not even be enough to pay your rent.

Plus, salary isn't enough of a consideration. Don't know about your neck of the woods, but here teachers are paid on a scale by education and experience. Not a set rate.
Some teachers will not teach in certain schools because of incidents of violence and apathy.
The students have to be there to learn, not thug about or ignore the teacher. Schools have to be a safe heaven for learning. Until that happens, the school is never going to gain ground.

So, yes, I agree that there needs to be stronger leadership at home and at school. There needs to be more entry level jobs close to the ( I hate to use this word) ghettos where the poor live, and transportation in and out of those areas.

BUT, the legislation I was asking about was in response to the statement "The Republicans refuse to address gun control."
My response was: "What legislation you would like to see passed that the criminals will follow?"


BoytonBrother - 12/26/2017 at 05:41 PM

quote:
BUT, the legislation I was asking about was in response to the statement "The Republicans refuse to address gun control."
My response was: "What legislation you would like to see passed that the criminals will follow?”


what falls under your definition of a criminal? Is it someone who plans on committing a crime but hasn’t committed one ever? Someone who committed a crime many years ago but has been clean ever since? You’d have to define that more clearly before we can begin to answer your question.


Muleman1994 - 12/27/2017 at 06:02 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
What legislation would you like to see passed that the criminals will follow?


The definition of a criminal is someone who ignores legislation. Inner-city gang violence isn't a gun issue. It's a socioeconomic issue, which isn't about Republican v Democrat because neither side has been able to improve that in my lifetime. As long as there is poverty, there will be inner-city crime. That's the byproduct of a free capitalist society.

The legislation that will achieve the goal, would be to place a top priority on funding under-developed communities with high-paying teaching jobs instead of $30k/year. Inner-city dysfunction is passed on from generation to generation because there are no leaders to show them a better way. Currently, there are no leaders at home, and no leaders at these dispicable schools because their low-paying teaching salaries attract the bottom of the barrel. No leadership anywhere in their life. Start by investing in the teachers so they can have positive role models that inspire them to go work and start a career. But unfortunately, every city teacher I've known speaks about how they simply don't have any money or resources. They often times spend their own money to initiate school projects. Sad!

[Edited on 12/22/2017 by BoytonBrother]


Figures I have seen indicate that in 1965, 25% of black children were born out of wedlock, and in 2015 70% of black children were born out of wedlock. The 1965 date is important since welfare put in the "marriage penalty". A non-married female with children got almost the same benefits as if she were married with no income. If the husband worked, benefits went down. Thus fathers left the family, even if they still put money into family funds. The nuclear family of the poor was thus broken up by economics.
The trend was then started, and carried on for more than 40 years. Bill Clinton changed welare with the TAFN Act (Temporary Assistance to Needy Families).

Now, while all the suggestions you gave are pretty good, remember cost of living in different areas of the country. A starting salary of 30K in Ga is a fairly decent salary, while in NYC it might not even be enough to pay your rent.

Plus, salary isn't enough of a consideration. Don't know about your neck of the woods, but here teachers are paid on a scale by education and experience. Not a set rate.
Some teachers will not teach in certain schools because of incidents of violence and apathy.
The students have to be there to learn, not thug about or ignore the teacher. Schools have to be a safe heaven for learning. Until that happens, the school is never going to gain ground.

So, yes, I agree that there needs to be stronger leadership at home and at school. There needs to be more entry level jobs close to the ( I hate to use this word) ghettos where the poor live, and transportation in and out of those areas.

BUT, the legislation I was asking about was in response to the statement "The Republicans refuse to address gun control."
My response was: "What legislation you would like to see passed that the criminals will follow?"



The lefties constantly call for "gun control legislation" but refuse to support enforcement.
All laws are useless unless they are enforced.

Chicago, under complete Democrat control, plea bargained the criminals who used illegal guns to murder down to misdemeanors or just dropped the charges.
That will soon begin to change since President Trump's Justice Department is sending in federal prosecutors.


jkeller - 12/27/2017 at 06:46 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
What legislation would you like to see passed that the criminals will follow?


The definition of a criminal is someone who ignores legislation. Inner-city gang violence isn't a gun issue. It's a socioeconomic issue, which isn't about Republican v Democrat because neither side has been able to improve that in my lifetime. As long as there is poverty, there will be inner-city crime. That's the byproduct of a free capitalist society.

The legislation that will achieve the goal, would be to place a top priority on funding under-developed communities with high-paying teaching jobs instead of $30k/year. Inner-city dysfunction is passed on from generation to generation because there are no leaders to show them a better way. Currently, there are no leaders at home, and no leaders at these dispicable schools because their low-paying teaching salaries attract the bottom of the barrel. No leadership anywhere in their life. Start by investing in the teachers so they can have positive role models that inspire them to go work and start a career. But unfortunately, every city teacher I've known speaks about how they simply don't have any money or resources. They often times spend their own money to initiate school projects. Sad!

[Edited on 12/22/2017 by BoytonBrother]


Figures I have seen indicate that in 1965, 25% of black children were born out of wedlock, and in 2015 70% of black children were born out of wedlock. The 1965 date is important since welfare put in the "marriage penalty". A non-married female with children got almost the same benefits as if she were married with no income. If the husband worked, benefits went down. Thus fathers left the family, even if they still put money into family funds. The nuclear family of the poor was thus broken up by economics.
The trend was then started, and carried on for more than 40 years. Bill Clinton changed welare with the TAFN Act (Temporary Assistance to Needy Families).

Now, while all the suggestions you gave are pretty good, remember cost of living in different areas of the country. A starting salary of 30K in Ga is a fairly decent salary, while in NYC it might not even be enough to pay your rent.

Plus, salary isn't enough of a consideration. Don't know about your neck of the woods, but here teachers are paid on a scale by education and experience. Not a set rate.
Some teachers will not teach in certain schools because of incidents of violence and apathy.
The students have to be there to learn, not thug about or ignore the teacher. Schools have to be a safe heaven for learning. Until that happens, the school is never going to gain ground.

So, yes, I agree that there needs to be stronger leadership at home and at school. There needs to be more entry level jobs close to the ( I hate to use this word) ghettos where the poor live, and transportation in and out of those areas.

BUT, the legislation I was asking about was in response to the statement "The Republicans refuse to address gun control."
My response was: "What legislation you would like to see passed that the criminals will follow?"



The lefties constantly call for "gun control legislation" but refuse to support enforcement.
All laws are useless unless they are enforced.

Chicago, under complete Democrat control, plea bargained the criminals who used illegal guns to murder down to misdemeanors or just dropped the charges.
That will soon begin to change since President Trump's Justice Department is sending in federal prosecutors.




Wow!! Federal prosecutors!!! What will they do since the crimes in Chicago are state crimes?


Muleman1994 - 12/27/2017 at 06:54 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
What legislation would you like to see passed that the criminals will follow?


The definition of a criminal is someone who ignores legislation. Inner-city gang violence isn't a gun issue. It's a socioeconomic issue, which isn't about Republican v Democrat because neither side has been able to improve that in my lifetime. As long as there is poverty, there will be inner-city crime. That's the byproduct of a free capitalist society.

The legislation that will achieve the goal, would be to place a top priority on funding under-developed communities with high-paying teaching jobs instead of $30k/year. Inner-city dysfunction is passed on from generation to generation because there are no leaders to show them a better way. Currently, there are no leaders at home, and no leaders at these dispicable schools because their low-paying teaching salaries attract the bottom of the barrel. No leadership anywhere in their life. Start by investing in the teachers so they can have positive role models that inspire them to go work and start a career. But unfortunately, every city teacher I've known speaks about how they simply don't have any money or resources. They often times spend their own money to initiate school projects. Sad!

[Edited on 12/22/2017 by BoytonBrother]


Figures I have seen indicate that in 1965, 25% of black children were born out of wedlock, and in 2015 70% of black children were born out of wedlock. The 1965 date is important since welfare put in the "marriage penalty". A non-married female with children got almost the same benefits as if she were married with no income. If the husband worked, benefits went down. Thus fathers left the family, even if they still put money into family funds. The nuclear family of the poor was thus broken up by economics.
The trend was then started, and carried on for more than 40 years. Bill Clinton changed welare with the TAFN Act (Temporary Assistance to Needy Families).

Now, while all the suggestions you gave are pretty good, remember cost of living in different areas of the country. A starting salary of 30K in Ga is a fairly decent salary, while in NYC it might not even be enough to pay your rent.

Plus, salary isn't enough of a consideration. Don't know about your neck of the woods, but here teachers are paid on a scale by education and experience. Not a set rate.
Some teachers will not teach in certain schools because of incidents of violence and apathy.
The students have to be there to learn, not thug about or ignore the teacher. Schools have to be a safe heaven for learning. Until that happens, the school is never going to gain ground.

So, yes, I agree that there needs to be stronger leadership at home and at school. There needs to be more entry level jobs close to the ( I hate to use this word) ghettos where the poor live, and transportation in and out of those areas.

BUT, the legislation I was asking about was in response to the statement "The Republicans refuse to address gun control."
My response was: "What legislation you would like to see passed that the criminals will follow?"



The lefties constantly call for "gun control legislation" but refuse to support enforcement.
All laws are useless unless they are enforced.

Chicago, under complete Democrat control, plea bargained the criminals who used illegal guns to murder down to misdemeanors or just dropped the charges.
That will soon begin to change since President Trump's Justice Department is sending in federal prosecutors.




Wow!! Federal prosecutors!!! What will they do since the crimes in Chicago are state crimes?




Oh ye of little knowledge.
The use of an illegal firearm makes the crime a federal matter.



jkeller - 12/27/2017 at 07:16 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
What legislation would you like to see passed that the criminals will follow?


The definition of a criminal is someone who ignores legislation. Inner-city gang violence isn't a gun issue. It's a socioeconomic issue, which isn't about Republican v Democrat because neither side has been able to improve that in my lifetime. As long as there is poverty, there will be inner-city crime. That's the byproduct of a free capitalist society.

The legislation that will achieve the goal, would be to place a top priority on funding under-developed communities with high-paying teaching jobs instead of $30k/year. Inner-city dysfunction is passed on from generation to generation because there are no leaders to show them a better way. Currently, there are no leaders at home, and no leaders at these dispicable schools because their low-paying teaching salaries attract the bottom of the barrel. No leadership anywhere in their life. Start by investing in the teachers so they can have positive role models that inspire them to go work and start a career. But unfortunately, every city teacher I've known speaks about how they simply don't have any money or resources. They often times spend their own money to initiate school projects. Sad!

[Edited on 12/22/2017 by BoytonBrother]


Figures I have seen indicate that in 1965, 25% of black children were born out of wedlock, and in 2015 70% of black children were born out of wedlock. The 1965 date is important since welfare put in the "marriage penalty". A non-married female with children got almost the same benefits as if she were married with no income. If the husband worked, benefits went down. Thus fathers left the family, even if they still put money into family funds. The nuclear family of the poor was thus broken up by economics.
The trend was then started, and carried on for more than 40 years. Bill Clinton changed welare with the TAFN Act (Temporary Assistance to Needy Families).

Now, while all the suggestions you gave are pretty good, remember cost of living in different areas of the country. A starting salary of 30K in Ga is a fairly decent salary, while in NYC it might not even be enough to pay your rent.

Plus, salary isn't enough of a consideration. Don't know about your neck of the woods, but here teachers are paid on a scale by education and experience. Not a set rate.
Some teachers will not teach in certain schools because of incidents of violence and apathy.
The students have to be there to learn, not thug about or ignore the teacher. Schools have to be a safe heaven for learning. Until that happens, the school is never going to gain ground.

So, yes, I agree that there needs to be stronger leadership at home and at school. There needs to be more entry level jobs close to the ( I hate to use this word) ghettos where the poor live, and transportation in and out of those areas.

BUT, the legislation I was asking about was in response to the statement "The Republicans refuse to address gun control."
My response was: "What legislation you would like to see passed that the criminals will follow?"



The lefties constantly call for "gun control legislation" but refuse to support enforcement.
All laws are useless unless they are enforced.

Chicago, under complete Democrat control, plea bargained the criminals who used illegal guns to murder down to misdemeanors or just dropped the charges.
That will soon begin to change since President Trump's Justice Department is sending in federal prosecutors.




Wow!! Federal prosecutors!!! What will they do since the crimes in Chicago are state crimes?




Oh ye of little knowledge.
The use of an illegal firearm makes the crime a federal matter.





Oh, so the gun violence is a federal matter. Then why are you blaming the mayor? Doesn't this make it Trump's problem?


Muleman1994 - 12/27/2017 at 07:55 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
What legislation would you like to see passed that the criminals will follow?


The definition of a criminal is someone who ignores legislation. Inner-city gang violence isn't a gun issue. It's a socioeconomic issue, which isn't about Republican v Democrat because neither side has been able to improve that in my lifetime. As long as there is poverty, there will be inner-city crime. That's the byproduct of a free capitalist society.

The legislation that will achieve the goal, would be to place a top priority on funding under-developed communities with high-paying teaching jobs instead of $30k/year. Inner-city dysfunction is passed on from generation to generation because there are no leaders to show them a better way. Currently, there are no leaders at home, and no leaders at these dispicable schools because their low-paying teaching salaries attract the bottom of the barrel. No leadership anywhere in their life. Start by investing in the teachers so they can have positive role models that inspire them to go work and start a career. But unfortunately, every city teacher I've known speaks about how they simply don't have any money or resources. They often times spend their own money to initiate school projects. Sad!

[Edited on 12/22/2017 by BoytonBrother]


Figures I have seen indicate that in 1965, 25% of black children were born out of wedlock, and in 2015 70% of black children were born out of wedlock. The 1965 date is important since welfare put in the "marriage penalty". A non-married female with children got almost the same benefits as if she were married with no income. If the husband worked, benefits went down. Thus fathers left the family, even if they still put money into family funds. The nuclear family of the poor was thus broken up by economics.
The trend was then started, and carried on for more than 40 years. Bill Clinton changed welare with the TAFN Act (Temporary Assistance to Needy Families).

Now, while all the suggestions you gave are pretty good, remember cost of living in different areas of the country. A starting salary of 30K in Ga is a fairly decent salary, while in NYC it might not even be enough to pay your rent.

Plus, salary isn't enough of a consideration. Don't know about your neck of the woods, but here teachers are paid on a scale by education and experience. Not a set rate.
Some teachers will not teach in certain schools because of incidents of violence and apathy.
The students have to be there to learn, not thug about or ignore the teacher. Schools have to be a safe heaven for learning. Until that happens, the school is never going to gain ground.

So, yes, I agree that there needs to be stronger leadership at home and at school. There needs to be more entry level jobs close to the ( I hate to use this word) ghettos where the poor live, and transportation in and out of those areas.

BUT, the legislation I was asking about was in response to the statement "The Republicans refuse to address gun control."
My response was: "What legislation you would like to see passed that the criminals will follow?"



The lefties constantly call for "gun control legislation" but refuse to support enforcement.
All laws are useless unless they are enforced.

Chicago, under complete Democrat control, plea bargained the criminals who used illegal guns to murder down to misdemeanors or just dropped the charges.
That will soon begin to change since President Trump's Justice Department is sending in federal prosecutors.




Wow!! Federal prosecutors!!! What will they do since the crimes in Chicago are state crimes?




Oh ye of little knowledge.
The use of an illegal firearm makes the crime a federal matter.





Oh, so the gun violence is a federal matter. Then why are you blaming the mayor? Doesn't this make it Trump's problem?



Emanuel and the city chose not to prosecute as did Obama.
Public safety in Chicago is the mayor's responsibility.
President Trump is making sure the federal crimes are prosecuted.

Just how many blacks do you approve of being murdered?



BoytonBrother - 12/27/2017 at 08:08 PM

quote:
That will soon begin to change since President Trump's Justice Department is sending in federal prosecutors.


And when he fails too, you’ll blame liberals, the boogeyman that you blame for your unhappiness. By the way, if you are unhappy with your job, money, and lonely life, it’s all your fault. You have nobody to blame but yourself. You are in charge of your own destiny, so the problems you have exist because you suck at life. Good day.


BoytonBrother - 12/27/2017 at 08:23 PM

quote:
Just how many blacks do you approve of being murdered?


Now that you stated Trump is responsible for this, we know YOU approve of whatever the actual number is in 2018. So, if Trump allows 400 blacks to be murdered in 2018, we know you approve. Thanks for letting us know I guess?


gina - 12/30/2017 at 01:03 AM

http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2017/12/27/wckg-radio-manager-says-un-tro ops-in-chicago/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=wckg-rad io-manager-says-un-troops-in-chicago

Radio Station Manager says the UN troops are already in Chicago, and it is not just for the unrest there. There is a bigger problem, mainly that the State of Illinois is bankrupt. Now what do you think will happen if/when they cannot pay their bills or the people living there who work for them or are getting services (social programs)?




Sang - 12/30/2017 at 05:31 PM

While Illinois is in trouble with pension debt, there are no UN troops in Chicago and the state is not going to declare bankruptcy..... geez.....

I guess a radio station manager would know better.........


jkeller - 12/31/2017 at 03:45 AM

quote:
http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2017/12/27/wckg-radio-manager-says- un-troops-in-chicago/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=wc kg-radio-manager-says-un-troops-in-chicago

Radio Station Manager says the UN troops are already in Chicago, and it is not just for the unrest there. There is a bigger problem, mainly that the State of Illinois is bankrupt. Now what do you think will happen if/when they cannot pay their bills or the people living there who work for them or are getting services (social programs)?






Every time I read one of your post, a few more brain cells die. But, somehow, I feel smarter knowing that you can’t tell fact from idiocy.


Bhawk - 12/31/2017 at 05:20 PM

Rarely do thread titles get more ridiculous as they age, but...


Lee - 1/1/2018 at 12:19 PM

I never post (or even read) these types of things but since I live here and it is near and dear to my heart I guess you could say, I will opine.

This thread is all over the place. There is no martial law in Chicago. The sky is not falling. Federal troops are not coming here. That's ridiculous.

We are one of the highest taxed places in the country. Penny a cent on any beverage with sugar in it? You got (well had) it. Doesn't seem like much but it is. You are taxing people to provide juice to their children? Yeah, that makes sense. Oh wait, you are worried about obesity and diabetic people. Sure.

Seven cents to get a bag to put your groceries in all with the goal of protecting the environment? Uh huh.

Property taxes here are insane.

But there's a reason why we are taxed so egregiously: It is a great place to live.

I could write a book on why it is but I won't pontificate on that.

Not perfect, nothing is.


Muleman1994 - 1/4/2018 at 11:14 PM

Kennedy accuses Emanuel of 'strategic gentrification plan' to force blacks out of Chicago

Chris Kennedy, Democratic candidate for governor, speaks about current politicians and the status quo. He is joined by his running mate Ra Joy and others. Jan. 3, 2018. (Zbigniew Bzdak/Chicago Tribune)

Rick Pearson and Bill RuthhartContact ReporterChicago Tribune

Democratic governor candidate Chris Kennedy on Wednesday accused Mayor Rahm Emanuel of leading a “strategic gentrification plan” aimed at forcing African-Americans and other minorities out of Chicago to make the city “whiter” and wealthier.

“I believe that black people are being pushed out of Chicago intentionally by a strategy that involves disinvestment in communities being implemented by the city administration, and I believe Rahm Emanuel is the head of the city administration and therefore needs to be held responsible for those outcomes,” Kennedy said during a news conference about gun violence in North Lawndale.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/politics/ct-met-chris-kennedy-rahm -emanuel-black-voters-20180103-story.html


Sang - 1/5/2018 at 12:23 AM

Yes - Kennedy "believes" - real proof there... You left out other parts of the article, such as:

"Kennedy, an heir to the iconic Massachusetts political family, has sought to appeal to African-American voters, focusing on the issue of gun violence and questioning the fairness of educational opportunities and property taxation in black neighborhoods. The names of his uncle, the late President John F. Kennedy, and father, the late U.S. Sen. Robert Kennedy, still carry resonance among older black voters from the family’s leadership in the struggle for civil rights during the 1960s.

Kennedy, who has had a tough time raising campaign money, is searching for a path to victory in the March 20 Democratic governor primary. He has ramped up his critiques of the Democratic establishment at a time when rival J.B. Pritzker has consolidated support from traditional Democratic organizations and spent tens of millions of dollars on TV advertising."


and....

The candidate contended Chicago was “using a strategy of selective containment where we’re allowing violence to continue as long as it only continues in certain neighborhoods.”

Those remarks drew a response from Chicago police Superintendent Eddie Johnson, who portrayed Kennedy as out of touch with the city’s crime-fighting efforts. Johnson also said “no one is spiking the ball” on reducing violence.

“I’ve never heard from Chris Kennedy. I’ve never even met him. He’s never visited a police station or asked me or my team for any kind of briefing on what we are doing in Chicago to address the gang violence and ongoing infusion of illegal guns on our streets,” Johnson said in a statement. “I’m not a politician, but I do take issue with the hard work our men and women are doing to beat back this violence is used to score political points.”


Muleman1994 - 1/5/2018 at 03:21 AM

quote:
Yes - Kennedy "believes" - real proof there... You left out other parts of the article, such as:

"Kennedy, an heir to the iconic Massachusetts political family, has sought to appeal to African-American voters, focusing on the issue of gun violence and questioning the fairness of educational opportunities and property taxation in black neighborhoods. The names of his uncle, the late President John F. Kennedy, and father, the late U.S. Sen. Robert Kennedy, still carry resonance among older black voters from the family’s leadership in the struggle for civil rights during the 1960s.

Kennedy, who has had a tough time raising campaign money, is searching for a path to victory in the March 20 Democratic governor primary. He has ramped up his critiques of the Democratic establishment at a time when rival J.B. Pritzker has consolidated support from traditional Democratic organizations and spent tens of millions of dollars on TV advertising."


and....

The candidate contended Chicago was “using a strategy of selective containment where we’re allowing violence to continue as long as it only continues in certain neighborhoods.”

Those remarks drew a response from Chicago police Superintendent Eddie Johnson, who portrayed Kennedy as out of touch with the city’s crime-fighting efforts. Johnson also said “no one is spiking the ball” on reducing violence.

“I’ve never heard from Chris Kennedy. I’ve never even met him. He’s never visited a police station or asked me or my team for any kind of briefing on what we are doing in Chicago to address the gang violence and ongoing infusion of illegal guns on our streets,” Johnson said in a statement. “I’m not a politician, but I do take issue with the hard work our men and women are doing to beat back this violence is used to score political points.”




I left nothing out of the Chicago Tribune article son.
I posted the link to the entire article.

The Democrat's policy of allowing the mass murder black people seems to be fine with the lefties.
I find it disgusting.



jkeller - 1/5/2018 at 04:11 AM

quote:
quote:
Yes - Kennedy "believes" - real proof there... You left out other parts of the article, such as:

"Kennedy, an heir to the iconic Massachusetts political family, has sought to appeal to African-American voters, focusing on the issue of gun violence and questioning the fairness of educational opportunities and property taxation in black neighborhoods. The names of his uncle, the late President John F. Kennedy, and father, the late U.S. Sen. Robert Kennedy, still carry resonance among older black voters from the family’s leadership in the struggle for civil rights during the 1960s.

Kennedy, who has had a tough time raising campaign money, is searching for a path to victory in the March 20 Democratic governor primary. He has ramped up his critiques of the Democratic establishment at a time when rival J.B. Pritzker has consolidated support from traditional Democratic organizations and spent tens of millions of dollars on TV advertising."


and....

The candidate contended Chicago was “using a strategy of selective containment where we’re allowing violence to continue as long as it only continues in certain neighborhoods.”

Those remarks drew a response from Chicago police Superintendent Eddie Johnson, who portrayed Kennedy as out of touch with the city’s crime-fighting efforts. Johnson also said “no one is spiking the ball” on reducing violence.

“I’ve never heard from Chris Kennedy. I’ve never even met him. He’s never visited a police station or asked me or my team for any kind of briefing on what we are doing in Chicago to address the gang violence and ongoing infusion of illegal guns on our streets,” Johnson said in a statement. “I’m not a politician, but I do take issue with the hard work our men and women are doing to beat back this violence is used to score political points.”




I left nothing out of the Chicago Tribune article son.
I posted the link to the entire article.

The Democrat's policy of allowing the mass murder black people seems to be fine with the lefties.
I find it disgusting.





So then why did you post it? It didn't help your case at all.


Try reading your links in the future.


Muleman1994 - 1/5/2018 at 04:44 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
Yes - Kennedy "believes" - real proof there... You left out other parts of the article, such as:

"Kennedy, an heir to the iconic Massachusetts political family, has sought to appeal to African-American voters, focusing on the issue of gun violence and questioning the fairness of educational opportunities and property taxation in black neighborhoods. The names of his uncle, the late President John F. Kennedy, and father, the late U.S. Sen. Robert Kennedy, still carry resonance among older black voters from the family’s leadership in the struggle for civil rights during the 1960s.

Kennedy, who has had a tough time raising campaign money, is searching for a path to victory in the March 20 Democratic governor primary. He has ramped up his critiques of the Democratic establishment at a time when rival J.B. Pritzker has consolidated support from traditional Democratic organizations and spent tens of millions of dollars on TV advertising."


and....

The candidate contended Chicago was “using a strategy of selective containment where we’re allowing violence to continue as long as it only continues in certain neighborhoods.”

Those remarks drew a response from Chicago police Superintendent Eddie Johnson, who portrayed Kennedy as out of touch with the city’s crime-fighting efforts. Johnson also said “no one is spiking the ball” on reducing violence.

“I’ve never heard from Chris Kennedy. I’ve never even met him. He’s never visited a police station or asked me or my team for any kind of briefing on what we are doing in Chicago to address the gang violence and ongoing infusion of illegal guns on our streets,” Johnson said in a statement. “I’m not a politician, but I do take issue with the hard work our men and women are doing to beat back this violence is used to score political points.”




I left nothing out of the Chicago Tribune article son.
I posted the link to the entire article.

The Democrat's policy of allowing the mass murder black people seems to be fine with the lefties.
I find it disgusting.





So then why did you post it? It didn't help your case at all.


Try reading your links in the future.



My post was in response to that idiot Sang's nonsense.
You seem to still need help in understanding words. Getting an education may help you... maybe.


Sang - 1/5/2018 at 06:31 PM

Name calling is your usual bullsh!t when people call out your lack of proving anything....matter of fact, it's all you have

Here is the editorial from the Chicago Tribune today:

Chris Kennedy's divisive fantasy

We know it’s early, but we hope the 2018 governor’s race doesn’t get any uglier than it did this week, when Democratic hopeful Chris Kennedy hallucinated aloud about Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s secret plan to drive minorities out of Chicago.

Kennedy’s Wednesday news conference was supposed to be about violence, but veered off into irresponsible and baseless conjecture about the exodus of black families from the city’s South and West sides.

“I believe that black people are being pushed out of Chicago intentionally by a strategy that involves disinvestment in communities being implemented by the city administration,” Kennedy said.

That population loss is real. The “strategic gentrification plan” is imaginary. It’s a cynical and divisive pitch for votes, and it conveniently commits the candidate to nothing.

The so-called strategy includes “cutting off funding” for schools and police, according to Kennedy. There’s not enough money for cops and teachers, he says, “because the mayor allows the Cook County assessor to continue to underassess the downtown buildings owned by corporate America — people who make donations to Rahm Emanuel, folks he’s now protecting.”

Say what you will about J.B. Pritzker, the Democrats’ slated candidate for governor: He understands how the property tax system works. But Pritzker’s ploy to lower his own property taxes — disconnecting the toilets in a vacant Gold Coast property so it could be classified as “uninhabitable” — didn’t result in less revenue for the city or schools. It simply shifted the burden to other taxpayers. Someone please explain that to Kennedy.

What is this business about cutting off funding, anyway? Chicagoans have watched their taxes rise steadily under Emanuel and are bracing for another increase to support the Chicago Public Schools, thanks to a new school funding law strongly supported by the mayor.

But Kennedy apparently believes taxpayers should waste much of that money to keep open half-empty schools in shrinking neighborhoods. That doesn’t improve educational opportunities, it diminishes them. Closing schools is an unpopular move, but it means CPS can spend more money teaching kids and less maintaining underutilized buildings. Maybe someone could explain that to Kennedy, too — and to his Democratic primary rivals Pritzker and Sen. Daniel Biss, and to Sen. Kwame Raoul, who’s running for Illinois attorney general …

Kennedy is right that last year’s homicide count of 650 is nothing to crow about, even if it’s more than 100 fewer than the year before. But he didn’t say anything meaningful about how to lower it more, probably because he doesn’t know what the Chicago Police Department is doing about it already. “As far as I can tell, he’s never spoken to one officer or any of CPD leadership,” police Superintendent Eddie Johnson says. “I’m not a politician, but I do take issue when the hard work our men and women are doing to beat back this violence is used to score political points.” Yep.

Violent crime remains a huge problem in Chicago. Public schools have a long way to go. Struggling minority neighborhoods haven’t shared in the economic prosperity of the downtown and North Side. Yes, some city policies disadvantage those communities and yes, it’s up to the mayor to address those inequities.

But Kennedy isn’t running for mayor. He’s running for governor. And he’s doing it by fomenting the fiction that the state’s population losses are being driven by a “strategic gentrification plan” in Chicago instead of the tax-happy, business-hostile mindset in Springfield. There’s nothing prescriptive about it. It’s just a cheap shot.

We’d love to hear what a Gov. Kennedy would do to help solve Chicago’s many problems. Right now, he’s too busy inventing more of them.


http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/editorials/ct-edit-kennedy-chica go-rahm-gentrification-20180104-story.html

[Edited on 1/5/2018 by Sang]


Muleman1994 - 1/7/2018 at 12:07 AM

quote:
Name calling is your usual bullsh!t when people call out your lack of proving anything....matter of fact, it's all you have

Here is the editorial from the Chicago Tribune today:

Chris Kennedy's divisive fantasy

We know it’s early, but we hope the 2018 governor’s race doesn’t get any uglier than it did this week, when Democratic hopeful Chris Kennedy hallucinated aloud about Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s secret plan to drive minorities out of Chicago.

Kennedy’s Wednesday news conference was supposed to be about violence, but veered off into irresponsible and baseless conjecture about the exodus of black families from the city’s South and West sides.

“I believe that black people are being pushed out of Chicago intentionally by a strategy that involves disinvestment in communities being implemented by the city administration,” Kennedy said.

That population loss is real. The “strategic gentrification plan” is imaginary. It’s a cynical and divisive pitch for votes, and it conveniently commits the candidate to nothing.

The so-called strategy includes “cutting off funding” for schools and police, according to Kennedy. There’s not enough money for cops and teachers, he says, “because the mayor allows the Cook County assessor to continue to underassess the downtown buildings owned by corporate America — people who make donations to Rahm Emanuel, folks he’s now protecting.”

Say what you will about J.B. Pritzker, the Democrats’ slated candidate for governor: He understands how the property tax system works. But Pritzker’s ploy to lower his own property taxes — disconnecting the toilets in a vacant Gold Coast property so it could be classified as “uninhabitable” — didn’t result in less revenue for the city or schools. It simply shifted the burden to other taxpayers. Someone please explain that to Kennedy.

What is this business about cutting off funding, anyway? Chicagoans have watched their taxes rise steadily under Emanuel and are bracing for another increase to support the Chicago Public Schools, thanks to a new school funding law strongly supported by the mayor.

But Kennedy apparently believes taxpayers should waste much of that money to keep open half-empty schools in shrinking neighborhoods. That doesn’t improve educational opportunities, it diminishes them. Closing schools is an unpopular move, but it means CPS can spend more money teaching kids and less maintaining underutilized buildings. Maybe someone could explain that to Kennedy, too — and to his Democratic primary rivals Pritzker and Sen. Daniel Biss, and to Sen. Kwame Raoul, who’s running for Illinois attorney general …

Kennedy is right that last year’s homicide count of 650 is nothing to crow about, even if it’s more than 100 fewer than the year before. But he didn’t say anything meaningful about how to lower it more, probably because he doesn’t know what the Chicago Police Department is doing about it already. “As far as I can tell, he’s never spoken to one officer or any of CPD leadership,” police Superintendent Eddie Johnson says. “I’m not a politician, but I do take issue when the hard work our men and women are doing to beat back this violence is used to score political points.” Yep.

Violent crime remains a huge problem in Chicago. Public schools have a long way to go. Struggling minority neighborhoods haven’t shared in the economic prosperity of the downtown and North Side. Yes, some city policies disadvantage those communities and yes, it’s up to the mayor to address those inequities.

But Kennedy isn’t running for mayor. He’s running for governor. And he’s doing it by fomenting the fiction that the state’s population losses are being driven by a “strategic gentrification plan” in Chicago instead of the tax-happy, business-hostile mindset in Springfield. There’s nothing prescriptive about it. It’s just a cheap shot.

We’d love to hear what a Gov. Kennedy would do to help solve Chicago’s many problems. Right now, he’s too busy inventing more of them.


http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/editorials/ct-edit-kennedy-chica go-rahm-gentrification-20180104-story.html

[Edited on 1/5/2018 by Sang]



So desperate to hide the blame for the mass murder of black people in cities run by Democrats you have to crawl into the opinion pages.

Sad.

Those black people are still dead and the left won't even recognize their failure to provide public safety.


jkeller - 1/7/2018 at 12:36 AM

quote:
quote:
Name calling is your usual bullsh!t when people call out your lack of proving anything....matter of fact, it's all you have

Here is the editorial from the Chicago Tribune today:

Chris Kennedy's divisive fantasy

We know it’s early, but we hope the 2018 governor’s race doesn’t get any uglier than it did this week, when Democratic hopeful Chris Kennedy hallucinated aloud about Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s secret plan to drive minorities out of Chicago.

Kennedy’s Wednesday news conference was supposed to be about violence, but veered off into irresponsible and baseless conjecture about the exodus of black families from the city’s South and West sides.

“I believe that black people are being pushed out of Chicago intentionally by a strategy that involves disinvestment in communities being implemented by the city administration,” Kennedy said.

That population loss is real. The “strategic gentrification plan” is imaginary. It’s a cynical and divisive pitch for votes, and it conveniently commits the candidate to nothing.

The so-called strategy includes “cutting off funding” for schools and police, according to Kennedy. There’s not enough money for cops and teachers, he says, “because the mayor allows the Cook County assessor to continue to underassess the downtown buildings owned by corporate America — people who make donations to Rahm Emanuel, folks he’s now protecting.”

Say what you will about J.B. Pritzker, the Democrats’ slated candidate for governor: He understands how the property tax system works. But Pritzker’s ploy to lower his own property taxes — disconnecting the toilets in a vacant Gold Coast property so it could be classified as “uninhabitable” — didn’t result in less revenue for the city or schools. It simply shifted the burden to other taxpayers. Someone please explain that to Kennedy.

What is this business about cutting off funding, anyway? Chicagoans have watched their taxes rise steadily under Emanuel and are bracing for another increase to support the Chicago Public Schools, thanks to a new school funding law strongly supported by the mayor.

But Kennedy apparently believes taxpayers should waste much of that money to keep open half-empty schools in shrinking neighborhoods. That doesn’t improve educational opportunities, it diminishes them. Closing schools is an unpopular move, but it means CPS can spend more money teaching kids and less maintaining underutilized buildings. Maybe someone could explain that to Kennedy, too — and to his Democratic primary rivals Pritzker and Sen. Daniel Biss, and to Sen. Kwame Raoul, who’s running for Illinois attorney general …

Kennedy is right that last year’s homicide count of 650 is nothing to crow about, even if it’s more than 100 fewer than the year before. But he didn’t say anything meaningful about how to lower it more, probably because he doesn’t know what the Chicago Police Department is doing about it already. “As far as I can tell, he’s never spoken to one officer or any of CPD leadership,” police Superintendent Eddie Johnson says. “I’m not a politician, but I do take issue when the hard work our men and women are doing to beat back this violence is used to score political points.” Yep.

Violent crime remains a huge problem in Chicago. Public schools have a long way to go. Struggling minority neighborhoods haven’t shared in the economic prosperity of the downtown and North Side. Yes, some city policies disadvantage those communities and yes, it’s up to the mayor to address those inequities.

But Kennedy isn’t running for mayor. He’s running for governor. And he’s doing it by fomenting the fiction that the state’s population losses are being driven by a “strategic gentrification plan” in Chicago instead of the tax-happy, business-hostile mindset in Springfield. There’s nothing prescriptive about it. It’s just a cheap shot.

We’d love to hear what a Gov. Kennedy would do to help solve Chicago’s many problems. Right now, he’s too busy inventing more of them.


http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/editorials/ct-edit-kennedy-chica go-rahm-gentrification-20180104-story.html

[Edited on 1/5/2018 by Sang]



So desperate to hide the blame for the mass murder of black people in cities run by Democrats you have to crawl into the opinion pages.

Sad.

Those black people are still dead and the left won't even recognize their failure to provide public safety.



"mass murder"? You need to learn what words and terms actually mean. Or are you a "mentally stable genius"?


BrerRabbit - 1/7/2018 at 03:04 AM

quote:
My post was in response to that idiot Sang's nonsense.


pops42 - 1/7/2018 at 05:05 AM

quote:
quote:
My post was in response to that idiot Sang's nonsense.


Is that mule-boy?


Muleman1994 - 1/7/2018 at 07:49 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
Name calling is your usual bullsh!t when people call out your lack of proving anything....matter of fact, it's all you have

Here is the editorial from the Chicago Tribune today:

Chris Kennedy's divisive fantasy

We know it’s early, but we hope the 2018 governor’s race doesn’t get any uglier than it did this week, when Democratic hopeful Chris Kennedy hallucinated aloud about Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s secret plan to drive minorities out of Chicago.

Kennedy’s Wednesday news conference was supposed to be about violence, but veered off into irresponsible and baseless conjecture about the exodus of black families from the city’s South and West sides.

“I believe that black people are being pushed out of Chicago intentionally by a strategy that involves disinvestment in communities being implemented by the city administration,” Kennedy said.

That population loss is real. The “strategic gentrification plan” is imaginary. It’s a cynical and divisive pitch for votes, and it conveniently commits the candidate to nothing.

The so-called strategy includes “cutting off funding” for schools and police, according to Kennedy. There’s not enough money for cops and teachers, he says, “because the mayor allows the Cook County assessor to continue to underassess the downtown buildings owned by corporate America — people who make donations to Rahm Emanuel, folks he’s now protecting.”

Say what you will about J.B. Pritzker, the Democrats’ slated candidate for governor: He understands how the property tax system works. But Pritzker’s ploy to lower his own property taxes — disconnecting the toilets in a vacant Gold Coast property so it could be classified as “uninhabitable” — didn’t result in less revenue for the city or schools. It simply shifted the burden to other taxpayers. Someone please explain that to Kennedy.

What is this business about cutting off funding, anyway? Chicagoans have watched their taxes rise steadily under Emanuel and are bracing for another increase to support the Chicago Public Schools, thanks to a new school funding law strongly supported by the mayor.

But Kennedy apparently believes taxpayers should waste much of that money to keep open half-empty schools in shrinking neighborhoods. That doesn’t improve educational opportunities, it diminishes them. Closing schools is an unpopular move, but it means CPS can spend more money teaching kids and less maintaining underutilized buildings. Maybe someone could explain that to Kennedy, too — and to his Democratic primary rivals Pritzker and Sen. Daniel Biss, and to Sen. Kwame Raoul, who’s running for Illinois attorney general …

Kennedy is right that last year’s homicide count of 650 is nothing to crow about, even if it’s more than 100 fewer than the year before. But he didn’t say anything meaningful about how to lower it more, probably because he doesn’t know what the Chicago Police Department is doing about it already. “As far as I can tell, he’s never spoken to one officer or any of CPD leadership,” police Superintendent Eddie Johnson says. “I’m not a politician, but I do take issue when the hard work our men and women are doing to beat back this violence is used to score political points.” Yep.

Violent crime remains a huge problem in Chicago. Public schools have a long way to go. Struggling minority neighborhoods haven’t shared in the economic prosperity of the downtown and North Side. Yes, some city policies disadvantage those communities and yes, it’s up to the mayor to address those inequities.

But Kennedy isn’t running for mayor. He’s running for governor. And he’s doing it by fomenting the fiction that the state’s population losses are being driven by a “strategic gentrification plan” in Chicago instead of the tax-happy, business-hostile mindset in Springfield. There’s nothing prescriptive about it. It’s just a cheap shot.

We’d love to hear what a Gov. Kennedy would do to help solve Chicago’s many problems. Right now, he’s too busy inventing more of them.


http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/editorials/ct-edit-kennedy-chica go-rahm-gentrification-20180104-story.html

[Edited on 1/5/2018 by Sang]



So desperate to hide the blame for the mass murder of black people in cities run by Democrats you have to crawl into the opinion pages.

Sad.

Those black people are still dead and the left won't even recognize their failure to provide public safety.



"mass murder"? You need to learn what words and terms actually mean. Or are you a "mentally stable genius"?



650 people were murdered in Chicago in 2017 and 94.5% of them were black.


BrerRabbit - 1/7/2018 at 11:02 PM

quote:
Those black people are still dead and the left won't even recognize their failure to provide public safety.


Sang - 1/7/2018 at 11:27 PM

quote:

650 people were murdered in Chicago in 2017 and 94.5% of them were black.




Once again, Mule just makes up statistics and posts them as facts with no back up.

Approx. 80% were black, as reported in the Tribune.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-chicago-homicides-data -tracker-htmlstory.html


jkeller - 1/7/2018 at 11:47 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
Name calling is your usual bullsh!t when people call out your lack of proving anything....matter of fact, it's all you have

Here is the editorial from the Chicago Tribune today:

Chris Kennedy's divisive fantasy

We know it’s early, but we hope the 2018 governor’s race doesn’t get any uglier than it did this week, when Democratic hopeful Chris Kennedy hallucinated aloud about Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s secret plan to drive minorities out of Chicago.

Kennedy’s Wednesday news conference was supposed to be about violence, but veered off into irresponsible and baseless conjecture about the exodus of black families from the city’s South and West sides.

“I believe that black people are being pushed out of Chicago intentionally by a strategy that involves disinvestment in communities being implemented by the city administration,” Kennedy said.

That population loss is real. The “strategic gentrification plan” is imaginary. It’s a cynical and divisive pitch for votes, and it conveniently commits the candidate to nothing.

The so-called strategy includes “cutting off funding” for schools and police, according to Kennedy. There’s not enough money for cops and teachers, he says, “because the mayor allows the Cook County assessor to continue to underassess the downtown buildings owned by corporate America — people who make donations to Rahm Emanuel, folks he’s now protecting.”

Say what you will about J.B. Pritzker, the Democrats’ slated candidate for governor: He understands how the property tax system works. But Pritzker’s ploy to lower his own property taxes — disconnecting the toilets in a vacant Gold Coast property so it could be classified as “uninhabitable” — didn’t result in less revenue for the city or schools. It simply shifted the burden to other taxpayers. Someone please explain that to Kennedy.

What is this business about cutting off funding, anyway? Chicagoans have watched their taxes rise steadily under Emanuel and are bracing for another increase to support the Chicago Public Schools, thanks to a new school funding law strongly supported by the mayor.

But Kennedy apparently believes taxpayers should waste much of that money to keep open half-empty schools in shrinking neighborhoods. That doesn’t improve educational opportunities, it diminishes them. Closing schools is an unpopular move, but it means CPS can spend more money teaching kids and less maintaining underutilized buildings. Maybe someone could explain that to Kennedy, too — and to his Democratic primary rivals Pritzker and Sen. Daniel Biss, and to Sen. Kwame Raoul, who’s running for Illinois attorney general …

Kennedy is right that last year’s homicide count of 650 is nothing to crow about, even if it’s more than 100 fewer than the year before. But he didn’t say anything meaningful about how to lower it more, probably because he doesn’t know what the Chicago Police Department is doing about it already. “As far as I can tell, he’s never spoken to one officer or any of CPD leadership,” police Superintendent Eddie Johnson says. “I’m not a politician, but I do take issue when the hard work our men and women are doing to beat back this violence is used to score political points.” Yep.

Violent crime remains a huge problem in Chicago. Public schools have a long way to go. Struggling minority neighborhoods haven’t shared in the economic prosperity of the downtown and North Side. Yes, some city policies disadvantage those communities and yes, it’s up to the mayor to address those inequities.

But Kennedy isn’t running for mayor. He’s running for governor. And he’s doing it by fomenting the fiction that the state’s population losses are being driven by a “strategic gentrification plan” in Chicago instead of the tax-happy, business-hostile mindset in Springfield. There’s nothing prescriptive about it. It’s just a cheap shot.

We’d love to hear what a Gov. Kennedy would do to help solve Chicago’s many problems. Right now, he’s too busy inventing more of them.


http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/editorials/ct-edit-kennedy-chica go-rahm-gentrification-20180104-story.html

[Edited on 1/5/2018 by Sang]



So desperate to hide the blame for the mass murder of black people in cities run by Democrats you have to crawl into the opinion pages.

Sad.

Those black people are still dead and the left won't even recognize their failure to provide public safety.



"mass murder"? You need to learn what words and terms actually mean. Or are you a "mentally stable genius"?



650 people were murdered in Chicago in 2017 and 94.5% of them were black.



https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/mass-murder

Mass murder is the deliberate illegal killing of a large number of people by a person or an organization.


Your vocabulary is as impressive as Trump's.


[Edited on 1/7/2018 by jkeller]


Jerry - 1/8/2018 at 01:02 AM

quote:
quote:

650 people were murdered in Chicago in 2017 and 94.5% of them were black.




Once again, Mule just makes up statistics and posts them as facts with no back up.

Approx. 80% were black, as reported in the Tribune.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-chicago-homicides-data -tracker-htmlstory.html


I have checked that link and I don't see the 80%, or any percentage figure. there.
Further checking other sources showed that Chicago had an approximately 17% reduction in homicides this past year with 77.7% of fatalities were black.
One disturbing fact is that in the percentage of ethnicity of assailants 9.9% were known to be black, but 85.1% of shooters were of unknown ethnicity/no arrest, and an unbelievable rate of 88% of no charges/no arrest/suspect unknown. Only 12% of ALL homicides have resulted in at least a suspect being arrested/charged.
Why such a low number of arrests?


jkeller - 1/8/2018 at 01:38 AM

quote:
quote:
quote:

650 people were murdered in Chicago in 2017 and 94.5% of them were black.




Once again, Mule just makes up statistics and posts them as facts with no back up.

Approx. 80% were black, as reported in the Tribune.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-chicago-homicides-data -tracker-htmlstory.html


I have checked that link and I don't see the 80%, or any percentage figure. there.
Further checking other sources showed that Chicago had an approximately 17% reduction in homicides this past year with 77.7% of fatalities were black.
One disturbing fact is that in the percentage of ethnicity of assailants 9.9% were known to be black, but 85.1% of shooters were of unknown ethnicity/no arrest, and an unbelievable rate of 88% of no charges/no arrest/suspect unknown. Only 12% of ALL homicides have resulted in at least a suspect being arrested/charged.
Why such a low number of arrests?


To get the required percentage it takes a little math. A graph showed 537 black victims. Adding up the total number of homicide victims brings the total to 673. 537 divided by 673 is .79791976225 or, rounding off, 80%. Glad to help.


jkeller - 1/8/2018 at 03:14 AM

quote:
quote:
quote:

650 people were murdered in Chicago in 2017 and 94.5% of them were black.




Once again, Mule just makes up statistics and posts them as facts with no back up.

Approx. 80% were black, as reported in the Tribune.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-chicago-homicides-data -tracker-htmlstory.html



The "650 people were murdered in Chicago in 2017 and 94.5% of them were black" data comes from the FBI.

As usual the lefties here are incapable of accessing public data and go running to a corrupt liberal media site.

The really sad part here is that the lefties do not care and certainly don't hold the Democrats, who are responsible for public safety, responsible.

Exactly how many black people do you want murdered each year?
Does the left have a quota or is it just a random kill 'em and you don't care thing?







Then by all means, please put up your link. According to your “stats”, only 36 non black people died by means of homocide in Chicago last year.


BrerRabbit - 1/8/2018 at 03:24 AM

quote:
Exactly how many black people do you want murdered each year?


One, if you're black.


BoytonBrother - 1/8/2018 at 04:34 PM

quote:
Exactly how many black people do you want murdered each year?


Why does Mule have so many thoughts about “wanting black people murdered”?


BrerRabbit - 1/8/2018 at 05:19 PM

quote:
Why does Mule have so many thoughts about “wanting black people murdered”?


I don't know. It was creepy enough the first time he posted that abomination, downright macabre when he started repeating it over and over.

One surefire way to even up the black/white homicide statistcs in Chicago would be for all the mulemen to go stand on the streets of the South Side and start spewing their party line. I'm sure the good doctors of the ghetto would be happy to administer the radical TCLT (trans-cortical lead therapy) indicated to cure the mulemen of their neurosociopathic illness, free of charge.

[Edited on 1/8/2018 by BrerRabbit]


Muleman1994 - 1/10/2018 at 03:15 PM

Right, got it.

The lefties here are fine with the mass murder of black people.

The far-left extremists: no conscience found.


pops42 - 1/10/2018 at 03:33 PM

quote:
Right, got it.

The lefties here are fine with the mass murder of black people.

The far-left extremists: no conscience found.


Calling YOU a P.O.S., would be an insult to stool samples. Maybe you can find somebody to read this to YOU. http://blackyouthproject.com/atlantas-murder-rate-now-higher-chicagos/

[Edited on 1/10/2018 by pops42]


BrerRabbit - 1/10/2018 at 04:12 PM

quote:
Right, got it.

The lefties here are fine with the mass murder of black people.

The far-left extremists: no conscience found.



Muleman1994 - 1/10/2018 at 04:18 PM

quote:
quote:
Right, got it.

The lefties here are fine with the mass murder of black people.

The far-left extremists: no conscience found.


Calling YOU a P.O.S., would be an insult to stool samples. Maybe you can find somebody to read this to YOU. http://blackyouthproject.com/atlantas-murder-rate-now-higher-chicagos/

[Edited on 1/10/2018 by pops42]



And pops steps up first to display his inability to recognize depravity and the Democrats complete disregard for black people.

Hundreds of black people being murdered in Chicago. The Democrats have the responsibility for public safety there. Pops doesn’t care.

BrerRabbit's expression of empathy for the dead black people and their families is his usual underwhelming.


pops42 - 1/10/2018 at 04:23 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
Right, got it.

The lefties here are fine with the mass murder of black people.

The far-left extremists: no conscience found.


Calling YOU a P.O.S., would be an insult to stool samples. Maybe you can find somebody to read this to YOU. http://blackyouthproject.com/atlantas-murder-rate-now-higher-chicagos/

[Edited on 1/10/2018 by pops42]



And pops steps up first to display his inability to recognize depravity and the Democrats complete disregard for black people.

Hundreds of black people being murdered in Chicago. The Democrats have the responsibility for public safety there. Pops doesn’t care.

BrerRabbit's expression of empathy for the dead black people and their families is his usual underwhelming.


I guess you can't find anyone to read you the link I posted, "Kaptain Klueless Klown".


BrerRabbit - 1/10/2018 at 05:34 PM

HERE COMES THE JUDGE!
HERE COMES THE JUDGE!
HERE COMES THE JUDGE!



Muleman1994 - 1/10/2018 at 08:21 PM

The death of black people in cities controlled by Democrats is out of control, but the lefties don’t care:

(BALTIMORE) — Baltimore has broken its per-capita homicide record.

In 2017, the city recorded 343 killings, bringing the homicide rate to a historical high of roughly 56 per 100,000 people. Baltimore, whose population has shrunk over decades, currently has about 615,000 inhabitants.

Some attribute the increase to more illegal guns, the fallout of the opioid epidemic, or various systemic failures.

http://time.com/5083393/baltimore-homicide-rate-2017/


BrerRabbit - 1/10/2018 at 10:24 PM

quote:
The death of black people in cities controlled by Democrats is out of control, but the lefties don’t care:




Muleman1994 - 1/10/2018 at 10:32 PM

quote:
quote:
The death of black people in cities controlled by Democrats is out of control, but the lefties don’t care:






Are you trying a new act?
Are the lefties actually outraged at the mass killing of black people in the cities the Democrats control?

It would be good for the murdered people's families if the left actually feigned any level of caring since to date the left has not cared.


Sang - 1/10/2018 at 10:36 PM

Once again, you don't seem to understand what mass murder means.

I know this is all fruitless because you will just change the game again (after you repeat this one over and over again),

but where is the righties outrage to the mass shooting in Las Vegas?


Muleman1994 - 1/10/2018 at 10:45 PM

quote:
Once again, you don't seem to understand what mass murder means.

I know this is all fruitless because you will just change the game again (after you repeat this one over and over again),

but where is the righties outrage to the mass shooting in Las Vegas?



The American People's outrage over the Vegas killings was intense and well reported.
Did you miss yet another actual news report?


Sang - 1/10/2018 at 11:46 PM

So what are the righties doing about it? I thought so.


jkeller - 1/11/2018 at 01:30 AM

quote:
quote:
Once again, you don't seem to understand what mass murder means.

I know this is all fruitless because you will just change the game again (after you repeat this one over and over again),

but where is the righties outrage to the mass shooting in Las Vegas?



The American People's outrage over the Vegas killings was intense and well reported.
Did you miss yet another actual news report?




The response from the Republican Congress was that it was too soon to talk about guncontrol. It has been more than 3 months since the shooting and still nothing from the right.


BrerRabbit - 1/11/2018 at 04:55 AM

Why is Mule so vindictive?


This thread come from : Hittin' The Web with the Allman Brothers Band
http://allmanbrothersband.com/

Url of this website:
http://allmanbrothersband.com//modules.php?op=modload&name=XForum&file=viewthread&fid=127&tid=145762