Thread: Criminal Investigation into Uranium One and Clinton Foundation Begins

Muleman1994 - 11/14/2017 at 03:44 AM

Sessions directs prosecutors to 'evaluate certain issues' involving Uranium One and Clinton, leaves door open on special counsel
By Brooke Singman | Fox News

Sessions opens door to special counsel on Uranium One

EXCLUSIVE – Attorney General Jeff Sessions directed senior federal prosecutors to evaluate “certain issues” requested by congressional Republicans, involving the sale of Uranium One and alleged unlawful dealings related to the Clinton Foundation, leaving the door open for an appointment of another special counsel.

In a letter first obtained by Fox News, the Justice Department responded to July 27 and September 26 requests from House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., and other committee members, who called for the appointment of a special counsel to investigate the matters in question.

The letter comes on the eve of Sessions’ testimony before the same committee, scheduled for Tuesday.

Nunes on Uranium One probe: Excuses make Clinton look guilty

“The Attorney General has directed senior federal prosecutors to evaluate certain issues raised in your letters,” Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd wrote.

“These senior prosecutors will report directly to the Attorney General and the Deputy Attorney General [Rod Rosenstein], as appropriate, and will make recommendations as to whether any matters not currently under investigation should be opened, whether any matters currently under investigation require further resources, or whether any matters merit the appointment of a Special Counsel,” Boyd wrote.

The Justice Department does not ordinarily confirm or deny investigations, and Boyd wrote that “this letter should not be construed to do so.”

The Justice Department’s letter specifically said that some of the topics requested by Goodlatte and other committee members were already being investigated by the department’s Inspector General’s office.

The letter specifically mentioned allegations related to the FBI’s handling of the Clinton email probe, including allegations that DOJ and FBI “policies or procedures” were “not followed in connection with, or in actions leading up to or related to” then-FBI Director James Comey’s public announcement to close the Clinton email “matter” on July 5, 2016, or the letter he sent lawmakers on October 28, 2016, about newly discovered Clinton emails, and that those “investigative decisions were based on improper considerations.”

Congress launches investigations into Obama-era uranium deal

“The Department has forwarded a copy of your letters to the IG so he can determine whether he should expand the scope of his investigation based on the information contained in those letters,” Boyd wrote. “Once the IG’s review is complete, the Department will assess what, if any, additional steps are necessary to address any issues identified by that review.”

While the Justice Department did not confirm or deny an ongoing investigation into Clinton matters, administration officials pointed Fox News to the attorney general’s testimony at his confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee in January, raising questions over whether he would recuse himself from this investigation.

“With regard to Secretary Clinton and some of the comments I made, I do believe that that could place my objectivity in question,” Sessions said in response to committee Chairman Chuck Grassley’s, R-Iowa, asking whether he could approach a Clinton investigation “impartially.” Sessions added at the time, “I believe the proper thing for me to do would be to recuse myself from any questions involving those kind of investigations that involve Secretary Clinton and that were raised during the campaign or to be otherwise connected to it.”

Former FBI Director Robert Mueller was appointed in May as a special counsel to investigate accusations of collusion between Russia and officials close to President Trump.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/11/13/sessions-directs-prosecutors-to- evaluate-certain-issues-involving-uranium-one-and-clinton-leaves-door-open- on-special-counsel.html


jkeller - 11/14/2017 at 04:35 AM

"Evaluate" is a long way from "criminal investigation" but, hey, if it helps you get through your day, good for you.


BrerRabbit - 11/14/2017 at 05:59 AM

McCarthy Era ll: The Sequel - now playing at a theater near you.


MartinD28 - 11/14/2017 at 12:47 PM

Anything to take the focus off of Trump, Trump Jr., Trump's admiration for dictators, Wikileaks, Russia, failed first year agenda, 30% + approval
ratings in polls, "wonderful" relationship with GOP Congress, etc.


Muleman1994 - 11/14/2017 at 05:38 PM

I see our friends from the far-left can’t seem to run fast enough from investigating Hillary Clinton’s corruption and criminal activities. Add in the politically motivated former FBI director Comey and we have a real show coming.

Extensive documents and evidence and numerous actual witnesses exist.

Get you popcorn, baby-back ribs, shrimp and beer ready folks. This is going to be fun!


BoytonBrother - 11/14/2017 at 08:28 PM

quote:
Get you popcorn, baby-back ribs, shrimp and beer ready folks. This is going to be fun!


Real men act this way about a football tailgate, not an online news story. Anyone know a girl who will go out with Mule?


Muleman1994 - 11/14/2017 at 09:33 PM

Justice Dept weighs inquiry into Clintons and Uranium One
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41985863

Justice Dept. to Weigh Inquiry Into Clinton Foundation
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/13/us/politics/justice-department-uranium-o ne-special-counsel.html

Justice Department Looking Into Obama-era Uranium Deal, Clintons
https://www.voanews.com/a/justice-department-looking-into-clintons-and-uran ium-one-deal/4114961.html


jkeller - 11/14/2017 at 09:51 PM

quote:
Justice Dept weighs inquiry into Clintons and Uranium One
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41985863

Justice Dept. to Weigh Inquiry Into Clinton Foundation
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/13/us/politics/justice-department-uranium-o ne-special-counsel.html

Justice Department Looking Into Obama-era Uranium Deal, Clintons
https://www.voanews.com/a/justice-department-looking-into-clintons-and-uran ium-one-deal/4114961.html




“Weighs inquiry” means that they are looking to see if there is anything to investigate. It is not, as you claim in the thread title, a criminal investigation. Sessions, under orders from Trump, told the DOJ to see if there is anything to investigate. But hang on to your dreams, Mule. Meanwhile, Baby Trump, Flynn, Sessions and your Orange Leader all get closer to the day of reckoning.


StratDal - 11/14/2017 at 09:55 PM

quote:
quote:
Get you popcorn, baby-back ribs, shrimp and beer ready folks. This is going to be fun!


Real men act this way about a football tailgate, not an online news story. Anyone know a girl who will go out with Mule?


Most of the mature, responsible women I know don't care for the president. Some even make some great baby-back ribs. Sorry but I can't help Mule.


MartinD28 - 11/14/2017 at 10:00 PM

quote:
quote:
Justice Dept weighs inquiry into Clintons and Uranium One
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41985863

Justice Dept. to Weigh Inquiry Into Clinton Foundation
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/13/us/politics/justice-department-uranium-o ne-special-counsel.html

Justice Department Looking Into Obama-era Uranium Deal, Clintons
https://www.voanews.com/a/justice-department-looking-into-clintons-and-uran ium-one-deal/4114961.html




“Weighs inquiry” means that they are looking to see if there is anything to investigate. It is not, as you claim in the thread title, a criminal investigation. Sessions, under orders from Trump, told the DOJ to see if there is anything to investigate. But hang on to your dreams, Mule. Meanwhile, Baby Trump, Flynn, Sessions and your Orange Leader all get closer to the day of reckoning.


Sessions - The clown who has lied in Congressional testimonies how many times now? Oh, I forgot that he has a memory problem - forgive him. Ironic that he would be even thinking about something as ridiculous as this given his credibility. He's a true lackey for Putin's boy.

Saw Steve Schmidt (Republican Operative) today on TV ripping this inquiry, investigation, or whatever one chooses to call it. He ripped it up & down.


Muleman1994 - 11/14/2017 at 10:37 PM

quote:
quote:
Justice Dept weighs inquiry into Clintons and Uranium One
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41985863

Justice Dept. to Weigh Inquiry Into Clinton Foundation
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/13/us/politics/justice-department-uranium-o ne-special-counsel.html

Justice Department Looking Into Obama-era Uranium Deal, Clintons
https://www.voanews.com/a/justice-department-looking-into-clintons-and-uran ium-one-deal/4114961.html




“Weighs inquiry” means that they are looking to see if there is anything to investigate. It is not, as you claim in the thread title, a criminal investigation. Sessions, under orders from Trump, told the DOJ to see if there is anything to investigate. But hang on to your dreams, Mule. Meanwhile, Baby Trump, Flynn, Sessions and your Orange Leader all get closer to the day of reckoning.


Isn't that cute.
You are incapable of explaining what anything "means". You are still trying to learn how to search and find actual information.


So, let's see.

Documents, evidence and actual witnesses exist for both the Uranium One and Clinton Foundation investigations.

Sixteen months after the Democrats make a baseless accusation no documents, evidence or actual witnesses exists for the fake Putin/Trump collusion investigation.

This is going to be fun to watch.




PhotoRon286 - 11/14/2017 at 11:30 PM

It's a damn shame this site doesn't have a "block" button like facebook does.

muleturd would be talking to himself and goober.


StratDal - 11/14/2017 at 11:58 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
Justice Dept weighs inquiry into Clintons and Uranium One
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41985863

Justice Dept. to Weigh Inquiry Into Clinton Foundation
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/13/us/politics/justice-department-uranium-o ne-special-counsel.html

Justice Department Looking Into Obama-era Uranium Deal, Clintons
https://www.voanews.com/a/justice-department-looking-into-clintons-and-uran ium-one-deal/4114961.html




“Weighs inquiry” means that they are looking to see if there is anything to investigate. It is not, as you claim in the thread title, a criminal investigation. Sessions, under orders from Trump, told the DOJ to see if there is anything to investigate. But hang on to your dreams, Mule. Meanwhile, Baby Trump, Flynn, Sessions and your Orange Leader all get closer to the day of reckoning.


Isn't that cute.
You are incapable of explaining what anything "means". You are still trying to learn how to search and find actual information.


So, let's see.

Documents, evidence and actual witnesses exist for both the Uranium One and Clinton Foundation investigations.

Sixteen months after the Democrats make a baseless accusation no documents, evidence or actual witnesses exists for the fake Putin/Trump collusion investigation.

This is going to be fun to watch.






If there was any impropriety or anything illegal in these matters, may they be investigated properly and those that are guilty, be brought to justice.


OriginalGoober - 11/15/2017 at 02:23 AM

Hannity is using a whiteboard and breaking the scandal all down. All roads point to Hillary Clinton.


jkeller - 11/15/2017 at 02:36 AM

quote:
Hannity is using a whiteboard and breaking the scandal all down. All roads point to Hillary Clinton.


Hannity. Yeah, OK, there is a reliable source.


jkeller - 11/15/2017 at 02:39 AM

Poor Mule. Sessions doesn't necessarily agree with the need for a special counsel.

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/14/jeff-sessions-no-trump-influence- doj-clinton-244885

"I want you all to know that if a special counsel is required, I, or I'm sure anyone else in the department that had the responsibility, would name one," Sessions said.

Sessions, who has recused himself from any matters connected to Clinton or the 2016 presidential campaign, also told the committee it would be inappropriate for the president to direct him to target a political rival.

"I have not been improperly influenced and would not be improperly influenced" by Trump, he said.


sixty8 - 11/15/2017 at 02:41 AM

So now Trump and his administration go after his political opponent to deflect attention away from his corrupt, dishonest, and inept administration. This is what you normally see in third world banana republic countries. I guess it makes sense being we have a Dictator wannabe sitting in the White House and disgracing us both domestically and abroad. This douche is gonna run this countries reputation into the ground if they don't get rid of him soon. I pray that the Dems take back the house next November and with each day of this circus sh_t show that reality becomes more probable. If and when they do Trump will be impeached and sent out the door as the dishonorable piece of cr_p he is along with his whole conniving family.


jkeller - 11/15/2017 at 02:44 AM

Fox News Shepard Smith debunks this. I doubt Mule will read this or watch the video.

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/11/14/shepard-smith-tackles-the-uranium-o ne-scandal-and-makes-a-surprising-conclusion


Muleman1994 - 11/15/2017 at 04:03 PM

quote:
Poor Mule. Sessions doesn't necessarily agree with the need for a special counsel.

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/14/jeff-sessions-no-trump-influence- doj-clinton-244885

"I want you all to know that if a special counsel is required, I, or I'm sure anyone else in the department that had the responsibility, would name one," Sessions said.

Sessions, who has recused himself from any matters connected to Clinton or the 2016 presidential campaign, also told the committee it would be inappropriate for the president to direct him to target a political rival.

"I have not been improperly influenced and would not be improperly influenced" by Trump, he said.



You prove yet again your are a dumba$$.
The politico piece selectively pulls snippets to make up a false report.

AG Sessions clearly stated why it is not yet time to bring in a Special Counsel on the Uranium One and Clinton Foundation matters.

He said there is process for that and that process is happening now.





jkeller - 11/15/2017 at 04:04 PM

quote:
quote:
Poor Mule. Sessions doesn't necessarily agree with the need for a special counsel.

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/14/jeff-sessions-no-trump-influence- doj-clinton-244885

"I want you all to know that if a special counsel is required, I, or I'm sure anyone else in the department that had the responsibility, would name one," Sessions said.

Sessions, who has recused himself from any matters connected to Clinton or the 2016 presidential campaign, also told the committee it would be inappropriate for the president to direct him to target a political rival.

"I have not been improperly influenced and would not be improperly influenced" by Trump, he said.



You prove yet again your are a dumba$$.
The politico piece selectively pulls snippets to make up a false report.

AG Sessions clearly stated why it is not yet time to bring in a Special Counsel on the Uranium One and Clinton Foundation matters.

He said there is process for that and that process is happening now.







It is you that is taking things out of context. Did you watch the Shepard Smith video? It is from the “most trusted” Fox News.


BoytonBrother - 11/15/2017 at 06:08 PM

quote:
So, let's see.

Documents, evidence and actual witnesses exist for both the Uranium One and Clinton Foundation investigations.

Sixteen months after the Democrats make a baseless accusation no documents, evidence or actual witnesses exists for the fake Putin/Trump collusion investigation.

This is going to be fun to watch


You keep falling for the corrupt media fake news. The FBI and CIA are biased, and launch investigations for political gain. Any action taken against the Clintons and the Democrats is definitely fake, and manufactured by the corrupt conservative media, and the corrupt FBI and CIA, as Trump already stated.


sixty8 - 11/15/2017 at 10:11 PM

quote:
Fox News Shepard Smith debunks this. I doubt Mule will read this or watch the video.

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/11/14/shepard-smith-tackles-the-uranium-o ne-scandal-and-makes-a-surprising-conclusion



Reposting for Stubborn Mule. Always liked Shepard Smith and found him to be the only true fair show host on FOX News.


PhotoRon286 - 11/16/2017 at 12:18 AM

quote:
quote:
Fox News Shepard Smith debunks this. I doubt Mule will read this or watch the video.

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/11/14/shepard-smith-tackles-the-uranium-o ne-scandal-and-makes-a-surprising-conclusion



Reposting for Stubborn Mule. Always liked Shepard Smith and found him to be the only true fair show host on FOX News.


Reposting for muleturd since he seems to enjoy trolling me.


Muleman1994 - 11/16/2017 at 03:19 PM

quote:
quote:
So, let's see.

Documents, evidence and actual witnesses exist for both the Uranium One and Clinton Foundation investigations.

Sixteen months after the Democrats make a baseless accusation no documents, evidence or actual witnesses exists for the fake Putin/Trump collusion investigation.

This is going to be fun to watch


You keep falling for the corrupt media fake news. The FBI and CIA are biased, and launch investigations for political gain. Any action taken against the Clintons and the Democrats is definitely fake, and manufactured by the corrupt conservative media, and the corrupt FBI and CIA, as Trump already stated.




You are right, the FBI and CIA were politically biased during the Obama administration.
There is significant evidence to support investigating the Uranium One and Clinton Foundation issues. as opposed to the fake Putin/Trump matter where there is no evidence whatsoever.

What does the CIA have to do with the Uranium One and Clinton Foundation?
Exactly. nothing.


PhotoRon286 - 11/16/2017 at 04:52 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
Fox News Shepard Smith debunks this. I doubt Mule will read this or watch the video.

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/11/14/shepard-smith-tackles-the-uranium-o ne-scandal-and-makes-a-surprising-conclusion



Reposting for Stubborn Mule. Always liked Shepard Smith and found him to be the only true fair show host on FOX News.


Reposting for muleturd since he seems to enjoy trolling me.


https://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/


Muleman1994 - 11/16/2017 at 05:22 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
Fox News Shepard Smith debunks this. I doubt Mule will read this or watch the video.

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/11/14/shepard-smith-tackles-the-uranium-o ne-scandal-and-makes-a-surprising-conclusion



Reposting for Stubborn Mule. Always liked Shepard Smith and found him to be the only true fair show host on FOX News.


Reposting for muleturd since he seems to enjoy trolling me.


https://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/




Interesting that the far-left Snopes actually admitted that "The multimillion sums were channeled through a subsidiary of the Clinton Foundation, CGSCI"

Snopes of course did not explain why the Clintons passed the bribery through their Canadian organization.
The reason: The Clintons would not have to disclose the funds.


BoytonBrother - 11/16/2017 at 05:31 PM

quote:
There is significant evidence to support investigating the Uranium One and Clinton Foundation issues.


Trump already explained that evidence produced by the corrupt FBI is fake.


jkeller - 11/16/2017 at 05:57 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
Fox News Shepard Smith debunks this. I doubt Mule will read this or watch the video.

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/11/14/shepard-smith-tackles-the-uranium-o ne-scandal-and-makes-a-surprising-conclusion



Reposting for Stubborn Mule. Always liked Shepard Smith and found him to be the only true fair show host on FOX News.


Reposting for muleturd since he seems to enjoy trolling me.


https://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/




Interesting that the far-left Snopes actually admitted that "The multimillion sums were channeled through a subsidiary of the Clinton Foundation, CGSCI"

Snopes of course did not explain why the Clintons passed the bribery through their Canadian organization.
The reason: The Clintons would not have to disclose the funds.



Hillary Clinton had no power to approve the deal. Have you watched the Shepard Smith video I posted? Why not? Are you afraid of the truth?


gina - 11/16/2017 at 08:52 PM

quote:
Hannity is using a whiteboard and breaking the scandal all down. All roads point to Hillary Clinton.


I like Sean very much, but he needs to realize people who make too much trouble end up on the Clinton Chronicles. Every single department of the govt. is rife with corruption. There is no such thing as justice in America. There is almost no point to even complain. Just get ready for when revolution comes, get your bug out bag, get off the grid, and then ban with like minded people to help create something decent with whatever is left of the country after the war.


jkeller - 11/16/2017 at 09:18 PM

quote:
quote:
Hannity is using a whiteboard and breaking the scandal all down. All roads point to Hillary Clinton.


I like Sean very much, but he needs to realize people who make too much trouble end up on the Clinton Chronicles. Every single department of the govt. is rife with corruption. There is no such thing as justice in America. There is almost no point to even complain. Just get ready for when revolution comes, get your bug out bag, get off the grid, and then ban with like minded people to help create something decent with whatever is left of the country after the war.


So I guess we won't be hearing from you anymore?


PhotoRon286 - 11/16/2017 at 10:36 PM

quote:
quote:
Hannity is using a whiteboard and breaking the scandal all down. All roads point to Hillary Clinton.


I like Sean very much, but he needs to realize people who make too much trouble end up on the Clinton Chronicles. Every single department of the govt. is rife with corruption. There is no such thing as justice in America. There is almost no point to even complain. Just get ready for when revolution comes, get your bug out bag, get off the grid, and then ban with like minded people to help create something decent with whatever is left of the country after the war.


Pure nutjobbery from our resident wacko.

Please head for the hills.

They can't wiretap your shoes there and we won't have to read your garbage.

Have we invaded Iran yet???


PhotoRon286 - 11/16/2017 at 10:39 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
Fox News Shepard Smith debunks this. I doubt Mule will read this or watch the video.

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/11/14/shepard-smith-tackles-the-uranium-o ne-scandal-and-makes-a-surprising-conclusion



Reposting for Stubborn Mule. Always liked Shepard Smith and found him to be the only true fair show host on FOX News.


Reposting for muleturd since he seems to enjoy trolling me.


https://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-uranium-russia-deal/




Interesting that the far-left Snopes



Use facts and show me where snopes is "far left".

In my experience, the people who say crap like that do so because most of the garbage they believe/spew online has been proven false by snopes, politifact, etc.

I'll wait for your proof of their bias, don't forget you can't use breitbart or faux for "information".

Time for popcorn.


BrerRabbit - 11/16/2017 at 10:46 PM

quote:
get your bug out bag


That's right, bug out and bring the cannibals your week's supply of mre's, snakebite kit, space blanket, and gold fillings. Maybe if you are real lucky they will keep you alive to keep the rest of you fresh while they cook your leg.

[Edited on 11/16/2017 by BrerRabbit]


2112 - 11/16/2017 at 11:34 PM

Seems like just another witch-hunt against Hillary Clinton. It's the GOP's favorite passtime. Maybe they should start another Benghazi investigation while their at it.

Here's the thing though. If she is actually guilty of a crime, I hope she get's punished for it. This is completely the opposite of Mule boy who will support his boy Trump no matter how much evidence is against him. Nope, Trump could be on tape asking Russia to hack Clinton’s emails and somehow Mule boy would find a way to spin it. Mule boy has fallen for Trump’s cult of personality and it matters not what he does, he will forever thing Trump is God's gift to man.


Muleman1994 - 11/17/2017 at 01:48 AM

quote:
Seems like just another witch-hunt against Hillary Clinton. It's the GOP's favorite passtime. Maybe they should start another Benghazi investigation while their at it.

Here's the thing though. If she is actually guilty of a crime, I hope she get's punished for it. This is completely the opposite of Mule boy who will support his boy Trump no matter how much evidence is against him. Nope, Trump could be on tape asking Russia to hack Clinton’s emails and somehow Mule boy would find a way to spin it. Mule boy has fallen for Trump’s cult of personality and it matters not what he does, he will forever thing Trump is God's gift to man. [/quote


Your assumptions are your standard far-left b/s.

There is massive evidence against the Clintons and zero evidence against President Trump.

But you keep thinking as your political masters dictate to you.

]


jkeller - 11/17/2017 at 02:59 AM

quote:
quote:
Seems like just another witch-hunt against Hillary Clinton. It's the GOP's favorite passtime. Maybe they should start another Benghazi investigation while their at it.

Here's the thing though. If she is actually guilty of a crime, I hope she get's punished for it. This is completely the opposite of Mule boy who will support his boy Trump no matter how much evidence is against him. Nope, Trump could be on tape asking Russia to hack Clinton’s emails and somehow Mule boy would find a way to spin it. Mule boy has fallen for Trump’s cult of personality and it matters not what he does, he will forever thing Trump is God's gift to man. [/quote


Your assumptions are your standard far-left b/s.

There is massive evidence against the Clintons and zero evidence against President Trump.

But you keep thinking as your political masters dictate to you.

]


Have you watched the Shepard Smith video I posted? No? Why not? Scared?


2112 - 11/17/2017 at 09:44 AM

quote:
quote:
Seems like just another witch-hunt against Hillary Clinton. It's the GOP's favorite passtime. Maybe they should start another Benghazi investigation while their at it.

Here's the thing though. If she is actually guilty of a crime, I hope she get's punished for it. This is completely the opposite of Mule boy who will support his boy Trump no matter how much evidence is against him. Nope, Trump could be on tape asking Russia to hack Clinton’s emails and somehow Mule boy would find a way to spin it. Mule boy has fallen for Trump’s cult of personality and it matters not what he does, he will forever thing Trump is God's gift to man. [/quote


Your assumptions are your standard far-left b/s.

There is massive evidence against the Clintons and zero evidence against President Trump.

But you keep thinking as your political masters dictate to you.

]


You just proved my point. You are devoid of all critical reasoning until you see whether their is an R or a D after their name.


Muleman1994 - 11/17/2017 at 02:34 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
Seems like just another witch-hunt against Hillary Clinton. It's the GOP's favorite passtime. Maybe they should start another Benghazi investigation while their at it.

Here's the thing though. If she is actually guilty of a crime, I hope she get's punished for it. This is completely the opposite of Mule boy who will support his boy Trump no matter how much evidence is against him. Nope, Trump could be on tape asking Russia to hack Clinton’s emails and somehow Mule boy would find a way to spin it. Mule boy has fallen for Trump’s cult of personality and it matters not what he does, he will forever thing Trump is God's gift to man. [/quote


Your assumptions are your standard far-left b/s.

There is massive evidence against the Clintons and zero evidence against President Trump.

But you keep thinking as your political masters dictate to you.

]


Have you watched the Shepard Smith video I posted? No? Why not? Scared?



I am quite familiar with the corrupt liberal media's freak out and spin of what Smith actually said.
Sheppard was simply stating his opinion and not an "official Fox news position".

Obviously the far-left extremists and the corrupt liberal media hate Fox News.
Fox News consistently creams al others in the ratings and is fair and balanced.
They present both sides of political issues having a commenter from the left and the right when debating political issues, a practice that has earned Fox News their most watched and most trusted status.


BoytonBrother - 11/17/2017 at 03:26 PM

quote:
Fox News consistently creams al others in the ratings and is fair and balanced.
They present both sides of political issues having a commenter from the left and the right when debating political issues, a practice that has earned Fox News their most watched and most trusted status.


This is so cute. Mule doesn’t realize that Fox News openly admits that their “fair and balanced” tag line refers to their mission to present the conservative viewpoint in response to CNN’s mission to spin to the left. Mule, it’s hilarious that you don’t understand this. What a dope you are. He thinks it’s about their stories, LOL!


jkeller - 11/17/2017 at 03:27 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
Seems like just another witch-hunt against Hillary Clinton. It's the GOP's favorite passtime. Maybe they should start another Benghazi investigation while their at it.

Here's the thing though. If she is actually guilty of a crime, I hope she get's punished for it. This is completely the opposite of Mule boy who will support his boy Trump no matter how much evidence is against him. Nope, Trump could be on tape asking Russia to hack Clinton’s emails and somehow Mule boy would find a way to spin it. Mule boy has fallen for Trump’s cult of personality and it matters not what he does, he will forever thing Trump is God's gift to man. [/quote


Your assumptions are your standard far-left b/s.

There is massive evidence against the Clintons and zero evidence against President Trump.

But you keep thinking as your political masters dictate to you.

]


Have you watched the Shepard Smith video I posted? No? Why not? Scared?



I am quite familiar with the corrupt liberal media's freak out and spin of what Smith actually said.
Sheppard was simply stating his opinion and not an "official Fox news position".

Obviously the far-left extremists and the corrupt liberal media hate Fox News.
Fox News consistently creams al others in the ratings and is fair and balanced.
They present both sides of political issues having a commenter from the left and the right when debating political issues, a practice that has earned Fox News their most watched and most trusted status.




Obviously, you did not watch it or read the transcript. You are unable and unwilling to discuss it. Shocking!


PhotoRon286 - 11/17/2017 at 11:01 PM

He also hasn't shown ANY proof that snopes is "far left biased" like he claims.

All hat, no mule.


Muleman1994 - 11/18/2017 at 06:46 PM

quote:
He also hasn't shown ANY proof that snopes is "far left biased" like he claims.

All hat, no mule.


I have no need or obligation to prove what is common knowledge.

A criminal investigation into Uranium One and The Clinton foundation.
The DNC and the Hillary campaign screwed your boy Sanders.
Yet all you want to do is divert the conversation to President Trump.

Typical far-left tactic.
When exposed for corruption and fraud, deflect to something unrelated.


BrerRabbit - 11/18/2017 at 08:47 PM

quote:
Typical far-left tactic.


Seems folks here both right and left are moderate centrists - which of course looks far left from the extreme right, where you stand alone.


This thread come from : Hittin' The Web with the Allman Brothers Band
http://allmanbrothersband.com/

Url of this website:
http://allmanbrothersband.com//modules.php?op=modload&name=XForum&file=viewthread&fid=127&tid=145595