Thread: Support for trumps impeachment higher than approval rating

pops42 - 7/6/2017 at 12:22 AM

http://www.newsweek.com/support-donald-trumps-impeachment-higher-latest-app roval-rating-631212

[Edited on 7/6/2017 by pops42]


Mike - 7/6/2017 at 01:35 AM

If Bush II and Obama weren't impeached, I think it's safe to say that Trump has this thing in the bag.


pops42 - 7/6/2017 at 02:20 AM

quote:
If Bush II and Obama weren't impeached, I think it's safe to say that Trump has this thing in the bag.
And what would obama be impeached for?


Mike - 7/6/2017 at 02:43 AM

quote:
quote:
If Bush II and Obama weren't impeached, I think it's safe to say that Trump has this thing in the bag.
And what would obama be impeached for?


Oh... I don't know. How about the fact that he orchestrated the largest theft in American history of private citizens' assets through the 3rd Amendment Net Worth Sweep of all profits from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, two PRIVATELY PHUCKING owned companies. How's that for starters?


pops42 - 7/6/2017 at 11:17 AM

quote:
quote:
quote:
If Bush II and Obama weren't impeached, I think it's safe to say that Trump has this thing in the bag.
And what would obama be impeached for?


Oh... I don't know. How about the fact that he orchestrated the largest theft in American history of private citizens' assets through the 3rd Amendment Net Worth Sweep of all profits from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, two PRIVATELY PHUCKING owned companies. How's that for starters?
Another load of crap from alex jones You are detached from reality.


Wis608 - 7/6/2017 at 11:26 AM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
If Bush II and Obama weren't impeached, I think it's safe to say that Trump has this thing in the bag.
And what would obama be impeached for?


Oh... I don't know. How about the fact that he orchestrated the largest theft in American history of private citizens' assets through the 3rd Amendment Net Worth Sweep of all profits from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, two PRIVATELY PHUCKING owned companies. How's that for starters?
Another load of crap from alex jones You are detached from reality.


Right on Mike, Pops has got such a hard on for Trump with his daily rants. Not much else to do while you are sitting in moms basement .


pops42 - 7/6/2017 at 11:35 AM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
If Bush II and Obama weren't impeached, I think it's safe to say that Trump has this thing in the bag.
And what would obama be impeached for?


Oh... I don't know. How about the fact that he orchestrated the largest theft in American history of private citizens' assets through the 3rd Amendment Net Worth Sweep of all profits from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, two PRIVATELY PHUCKING owned companies. How's that for starters?
Another load of crap from alex jones You are detached from reality.


Right on Mike, Pops has got such a hard on for Trump with his daily rants. Not much else to do while you are sitting in moms basement .
Another wit-less wonder, you better check in with alex jones.


Mike - 7/6/2017 at 01:40 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
If Bush II and Obama weren't impeached, I think it's safe to say that Trump has this thing in the bag.
And what would obama be impeached for?


Oh... I don't know. How about the fact that he orchestrated the largest theft in American history of private citizens' assets through the 3rd Amendment Net Worth Sweep of all profits from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, two PRIVATELY PHUCKING owned companies. How's that for starters?
Another load of crap from alex jones You are detached from reality.


I have an idea. How about you GFY. I bought the GSE's in 2008. Infowars picked up this **** in 2016 and started running with it. I have testified before Congress on this **** , and could write a thesis on it.

**** moron.


Mike - 7/6/2017 at 01:49 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
If Bush II and Obama weren't impeached, I think it's safe to say that Trump has this thing in the bag.
And what would obama be impeached for?


Oh... I don't know. How about the fact that he orchestrated the largest theft in American history of private citizens' assets through the 3rd Amendment Net Worth Sweep of all profits from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, two PRIVATELY PHUCKING owned companies. How's that for starters?
Another load of crap from alex jones You are detached from reality.


Right on Mike, Pops has got such a hard on for Trump with his daily rants. Not much else to do while you are sitting in moms basement .
Another wit-less wonder, you better check in with alex jones.


And while you're pontificating on the intellect of others herein, why not examine the title of this thread? You must be a genius if you can't figure out that any purported support for impeachment polling is diametrically opposed to his approval rating. But we should certainly trust the polls regarding impeachment and approval ratings. After all, the polling entities had such a banner performance in the elections. Jeesh...


pops42 - 7/6/2017 at 02:20 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
If Bush II and Obama weren't impeached, I think it's safe to say that Trump has this thing in the bag.
And what would obama be impeached for?


Oh... I don't know. How about the fact that he orchestrated the largest theft in American history of private citizens' assets through the 3rd Amendment Net Worth Sweep of all profits from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, two PRIVATELY PHUCKING owned companies. How's that for starters?
Another load of crap from alex jones You are detached from reality.


I have an idea. How about you GFY. I bought the GSE's in 2008. Infowars picked up this **** in 2016 and started running with it. I have testified before Congress on this **** , and could write a thesis on it.

**** moron.


Sure you did!, and I'm flying the first manned mission to mars!..........woogie


Mike - 7/6/2017 at 02:26 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
If Bush II and Obama weren't impeached, I think it's safe to say that Trump has this thing in the bag.
And what would obama be impeached for?


Oh... I don't know. How about the fact that he orchestrated the largest theft in American history of private citizens' assets through the 3rd Amendment Net Worth Sweep of all profits from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, two PRIVATELY PHUCKING owned companies. How's that for starters?
Another load of crap from alex jones You are detached from reality.


I have an idea. How about you GFY. I bought the GSE's in 2008. Infowars picked up this **** in 2016 and started running with it. I have testified before Congress on this **** , and could write a thesis on it.

**** moron.


Sure you did!, and I'm flying the first manned mission to mars!..........woogie


Whatever, Delta Bravo...


BrerRabbit - 7/6/2017 at 07:53 PM

quote:
I have testified before Congress on this **** , and could write a thesis on it.

**** moron.


Then it is part of the Congressional Record, available to the public via : https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record

Care to suggest some search terms? Sounds like some interesting testimony.


pops42 - 7/6/2017 at 07:59 PM


Mike - 7/6/2017 at 11:58 PM

quote:
quote:
I have testified before Congress on this **** , and could write a thesis on it.

**** moron.


Then it is part of the Congressional Record, available to the public via : https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record

Care to suggest some search terms? Sounds like some interesting testimony.




Right.... Fortunately, I value my anonymity more than I care to prove you wrong. It was before a Congressional committee along with others. Believe me if you want. I don't care. Regardless, my point about Obama still stands without contradiction.

Forensic accounting has proven that the GSE's never needed the $187b loan forced upon them. Officials at the White House under Obama discussed in now-public e-mail that they knew the GSE's were entering an "age of profitability," and shortly thereafter, in 2012, took action to sweep all profits from the GSE's and direct them to the Treasury's coffers - all without congressional approval. The FHFA, under the guidance of Mel Watt, according to H.E.R.A. answers to NOBODY. According to the language contained in H.E.R.A., the FHFA doesn't answer to the Executive Branch, Congress or the Judiciary. Since that time in 2012, FNMA and FMCC have returned over $250b back to the government, and the individual shareholders have been **** ed. What's worse is that FNMA and FMCC are running out of capital buffers, and are scheduled to be out of capital by 2018. If allowed to happen, affordable housing in our country is done.

Something must happen to right the ship. The two biggest **** ers out there who are attempting to wind down the GSE's are Bob Corker from TN and Mark Warner from VA. Corker is the biggest **** ing crook in Congress and needs to be strung up by his nads. His only interest is turning the mortgage business over to the TBTF banks - primarily Wells Fargo. Mnuchin and Trump could have taken steps to stop the sweep, but they haven't, which proves they are no different from all the rest. It's all about the **** ing money.


BrerRabbit - 7/7/2017 at 12:29 AM

Prove me wrong? Kinda defensive. Anyone would wonder if you were on the level. But I believed you more than I didn't.

Damn man, for someone who arrived back here saying how he wished people were more civil you sure are spittin and hissin! Making Muleman look like frekin Mr. Rogers.

Believe it or not I was actually interested in the testimony. Can dig the anonymity thing, how about posting some of it here without names or dates. Not every day riffraff like us find a person who testified before Congress among our ranks.


Mike - 7/7/2017 at 12:44 AM

quote:
Prove me wrong? Kinda defensive. Anyone would wonder if you were on the level. But I believed you more than I didn't.


Mea culpa. I naturally assumed you were on the offensive given popsmear's posture.

quote:
Damn man, for someone who arrived back here saying how he wished people were more civil you sure are spittin and hissin! Making Muleman look like frekin Mr. Rogers.


Once again - you're correct. My bad. My post earlier regarding the demeanor and tone of the board was an expression of regret. I started posting on "the old board" back in the late 1990's. With the exception of Gina, it was relatively civil back then. Eventually, politics took over and it got really nasty. I eventually made the decision to bow out based on a few interactions with others. I really worked hard on being civil. When ultimately deciding to drop back in, I guess my attitude changed a little and I figured I didn't really care what other people thought. Forgive me for my abrasiveness.

quote:
Believe it or not I was actually interested in the testimony. Can dig the anonymity thing, how about posting some of it here without names or dates. Not every day riffraff like us find a person who testified before Congress among our ranks.


I wasted money a while back buying into a Congressional records service online only to find out that the individual testimonies of 6 others and me are not available as we didn't know enough to submit a written, prepared testimony for the record. That's what was explained to me when I contacted Congress and The Center for Legislative Archives.

I'll be glad to discuss the issue, though, as it truly is the biggest and most under-reported story of our generation. The precedents that this can potentially set could have long-lasting and devastating impacts on us as a nation. Imagine an instance where the government can arbitrarily expropriate a public company from its owners and craft the process in such a way so that there's absolutely zero recourse. Imagine if that happened to Apple, Google, Coca Cola or some other major company.



[Edited on 7/7/2017 by Mike]


pops42 - 7/7/2017 at 02:23 AM

quote:
quote:
Prove me wrong? Kinda defensive. Anyone would wonder if you were on the level. But I believed you more than I didn't.


Mea culpa. I naturally assumed you were on the offensive given popsmear's posture.

quote:
Damn man, for someone who arrived back here saying how he wished people were more civil you sure are spittin and hissin! Making Muleman look like frekin Mr. Rogers.


Once again - you're correct. My bad. My post earlier regarding the demeanor and tone of the board was an expression of regret. I started posting on "the old board" back in the late 1990's. With the exception of Gina, it was relatively civil back then. Eventually, politics took over and it got really nasty. I eventually made the decision to bow out based on a few interactions with others. I really worked hard on being civil. When ultimately deciding to drop back in, I guess my attitude changed a little and I figured I didn't really care what other people thought. Forgive me for my abrasiveness.

quote:
Believe it or not I was actually interested in the testimony. Can dig the anonymity thing, how about posting some of it here without names or dates. Not every day riffraff like us find a person who testified before Congress among our ranks.


I wasted money a while back buying into a Congressional records service online only to find out that the individual testimonies of 6 others and me are not available as we didn't know enough to submit a written, prepared testimony for the record. That's what was explained to me when I contacted Congress and The Center for Legislative Archives.

I'll be glad to discuss the issue, though, as it truly is the biggest and most under-reported story of our generation. The precedents that this can potentially set could have long-lasting and devastating impacts on us as a nation. Imagine an instance where the government can arbitrarily expropriate a public company from its owners and craft the process in such a way so that there's absolutely zero recourse. Imagine if that happened to Apple, Google, Coca Cola or some other major company.



[Edited on 7/7/2017 by Mike]
I believe you. like I believe mule boy was a marine, and on the ebola taskforce


Mike - 7/7/2017 at 02:32 AM

Darn. And I was hoping this whole time to come back after a few years and impress you.

[Edited on 7/7/2017 by Mike]


BrerRabbit - 7/7/2017 at 05:45 PM

Pops, this guy can actually string a sentence together, unlike some of the other cons here, I would like to hear him paraphrase the gist of his Congressional stuff. So round up your flying monkeys and herd em back up your butt, and set them free to soar after he gives us the info, if it still sounds like bs to you.

You gotta admit, "Popsmear" was a topshelf WP insult, you ain't gonna top that! Hahaha!


piacere - 7/8/2017 at 03:29 PM

yeah.

"popsmear".

nice to see ya, Mike.


pops42 - 7/8/2017 at 06:57 PM

quote:
yeah.

"popsmear".

nice to see ya, Mike.
You sure have some meaningful insight to add..................jagoff


Muleman1994 - 7/8/2017 at 08:41 PM

With their Putin/Russia/Trump conspiracy exposed as a lie the Democrats and the far-left extremists have moved on to the impeachment rant.

Ever notice when asked the Democrats and the far-left extremists never can say what is their basis/charge for impeachment but the corrupt liberal media also never calls the liars out.

The only people in the U.S. talking impeachment are the Democrats and the far-left extremists and their compliant corrupt liberal media. The citizens laugh when asked about it.

Back to the same thing: The Democrats and the far-left extremists have nothing to offer, cannot win an election, have no leadership and are becoming irrelevant.

Notice pops source?

Newsweek. That garbage rag was sold for $1.00 and hasn’t mattered in years.


pops42 - 7/8/2017 at 08:47 PM

quote:
With their Putin/Russia/Trump conspiracy exposed as a lie the Democrats and the far-left extremists have moved on to the impeachment rant.

Ever notice when asked the Democrats and the far-left extremists never can say what is their basis/charge for impeachment but the corrupt liberal media also never calls the liars out.

The only people in the U.S. talking impeachment are the Democrats and the far-left extremists and their compliant corrupt liberal media. The citizens laugh when asked about it.

Back to the same thing: The Democrats and the far-left extremists have nothing to offer, cannot win an election, have no leadership and are becoming irrelevant.

Notice pops source?

Newsweek. That garbage rag was sold for $1.00 and hasn’t mattered in years.


Prove what is in the newsweek article is WRONG..................you can't.


BillyBlastoff - 7/8/2017 at 10:05 PM

I've never seen a President as weak as Trump. It is obvious he is owned by the Russians. He should get ahead of the whole "Peeinhisface Gate" and just admit he likes sexual humiliation. It isn't against the law. I'm not going to judge him just because he enjoys golden showers.

His weakness and total capitulation to Putin, along with his intellectual inferiority when compared to other world leaders, I find very troubling.


jkeller - 7/8/2017 at 11:08 PM

quote:
With their Putin/Russia/Trump conspiracy exposed as a lie the Democrats and the far-left extremists have moved on to the impeachment rant.

Ever notice when asked the Democrats and the far-left extremists never can say what is their basis/charge for impeachment but the corrupt liberal media also never calls the liars out.

The only people in the U.S. talking impeachment are the Democrats and the far-left extremists and their compliant corrupt liberal media. The citizens laugh when asked about it.

Back to the same thing: The Democrats and the far-left extremists have nothing to offer, cannot win an election, have no leadership and are becoming irrelevant.

Notice pops source?

Newsweek. That garbage rag was sold for $1.00 and hasn’t mattered in years.




At least he provides a source. You seldom do. So, if you don't like his source, provide a better one. Or, shut up. You have nothing.


BrerRabbit - 7/9/2017 at 12:03 AM

I sensed early on that Trump would win - it fit the gestalt of the era. I may well be wrong, but this feels like the beginning of a sea change in the USA, a conservative backlash to answer all the changes since the 1960s. Way it looks to me is not only will Trump not get impeached, he could easily get re-elected, and it won't surprise me at all if he is a three term president.


jkeller - 7/9/2017 at 12:26 AM

quote:
I sensed early on that Trump would win - it fit the gestalt of the era. I may well be wrong, but this feels like the beginning of a sea change in the USA, a conservative backlash to answer all the changes since the 1960s. Way it looks to me is not only will Trump not get impeached, he could easily get re-elected, and it won't surprise me at all if he is a three term president.


If his approval rating keeps tanking, he may face a challenge for he nomination. Even if he gets it, I don't see a path to reelection. There is a lot of buyers remorse. And the constitution prohibits him from seeking a 3rd term.


BrerRabbit - 7/9/2017 at 01:16 AM

You are correct - Just checked, FDR did three terms and election to a fourth, Harry Truman proposed a limit to two terms. in 1951, the 22nd amendment was ratified.

Let's hope there is still a Constitution after two terms of Trump.


Muleman1994 - 7/9/2017 at 02:19 AM

quote:
quote:
With their Putin/Russia/Trump conspiracy exposed as a lie the Democrats and the far-left extremists have moved on to the impeachment rant.

Ever notice when asked the Democrats and the far-left extremists never can say what is their basis/charge for impeachment but the corrupt liberal media also never calls the liars out.

The only people in the U.S. talking impeachment are the Democrats and the far-left extremists and their compliant corrupt liberal media. The citizens laugh when asked about it.

Back to the same thing: The Democrats and the far-left extremists have nothing to offer, cannot win an election, have no leadership and are becoming irrelevant.

Notice pops source?

Newsweek. That garbage rag was sold for $1.00 and hasn’t mattered in years.




At least he provides a source. You seldom do. So, if you don't like his source, provide a better one. Or, shut up. You have nothing.



An issue/popularity poll opinion article in a disgraced magazine tells pops want he wants to hear and that dumbass actually believes it as do you.

I'll ask you the same question asked of the Democrats, left-wing extremists and corrupt liberal media:

On what basis or charge would you attempt to impeach President Trump?

So far while a TV camera is in their face not one Democrats or left-wing extremists can or will answer.

Since you and that fool pops are buying that crap, answer that question.





Muleman1994 - 7/9/2017 at 02:30 AM

Did anyone notice that the "impeachment" numbers came from "Public Policy Polling—a firm that does public surveys as well as polling for Democratic candidates"

Ah, the left does a poll for a political issue that the left is pushing now that informed people know their Putin/Russia/Trump "conspiracy" was crap from the beginning and amazingly the results favor their political agenda.

Y'all got played again and not surprisingly you bought it!
The little low-info voters club remains as gullible as ever.


jkeller - 7/9/2017 at 02:44 AM

quote:
Did anyone notice that the "impeachment" numbers came from "Public Policy Polling—a firm that does public surveys as well as polling for Democratic candidates"

Ah, the left does a poll for a political issue that the left is pushing now that informed people know their Putin/Russia/Trump "conspiracy" was crap from the beginning and amazingly the results favor their political agenda.

Y'all got played again and not surprisingly you bought it!
The little low-info voters club remains as gullible as ever.



Obstruction of justice. Violation of the emoluments law. Having illegal dealings with a foreign government. Treason.

And still, you cannot provide any links at any time. You need to shut up.


Muleman1994 - 7/9/2017 at 11:40 PM

quote:
quote:
Did anyone notice that the "impeachment" numbers came from "Public Policy Polling—a firm that does public surveys as well as polling for Democratic candidates"

Ah, the left does a poll for a political issue that the left is pushing now that informed people know their Putin/Russia/Trump "conspiracy" was crap from the beginning and amazingly the results favor their political agenda.

Y'all got played again and not surprisingly you bought it!
The little low-info voters club remains as gullible as ever.



Obstruction of justice. Violation of the emoluments law. Having illegal dealings with a foreign government. Treason.

And still, you cannot provide any links at any time. You need to shut up.


All lies. Every one of the corrupt liberal media's lies are attributed to "unnamed sources" and not one of them have ever produced proof or documentation of anything.

But of course you are so f*cking stupid you don't know when you are being played.




jkeller - 7/10/2017 at 12:16 AM

quote:
quote:
quote:
Did anyone notice that the "impeachment" numbers came from "Public Policy Polling—a firm that does public surveys as well as polling for Democratic candidates"

Ah, the left does a poll for a political issue that the left is pushing now that informed people know their Putin/Russia/Trump "conspiracy" was crap from the beginning and amazingly the results favor their political agenda.

Y'all got played again and not surprisingly you bought it!
The little low-info voters club remains as gullible as ever.


.

Obstruction of justice. Violation of the emoluments law. Having illegal dealings with a foreign government. Treason.

And still, you cannot provide any links at any time. You need to shut up.


All lies. Every one of the corrupt liberal media's lies are attributed to "unnamed sources" and not one of them have ever produced proof or documentation of anything.

But of course you are so f*cking stupid you don't know when you are being played.






Watch the news. All of the news, not just Fox.

[Edited on 7/10/2017 by jkeller]


BrerRabbit - 7/10/2017 at 12:59 AM

quote:
But of course you are so f*cking stupid. . .


Feel better? Let it out man, let it out.

Just a suggestion, you might want to take some self-time to review why your communication skills haven't developed beyond the fifth grade recess playground level. You seem to be regressing. Another couple years at this rate you will be on here going "nyah nyah nyah nyah nyaah nyaah".

Upside is you will have reverted back to before you started using all that foul language. So, you are in a good place, as any way you develop from here will be an improvement. It's a win-win!


2112 - 7/10/2017 at 01:16 AM

quote:
quote:
But of course you are so f*cking stupid. . .


Feel better? Let it out man, let it out.

Just a suggestion, you might want to take some self-time to review why your communication skills haven't developed beyond the fifth grade recess playground level. You seem to be regressing. Another couple years at this rate you will be on here going "nyah nyah nyah nyah nyaah nyaah".

Upside is you will have reverted back to before you started using all that foul language. So, you are in a good place, as any way you develop from here will be an improvement. It's a win-win!


Trump loves the simple minded voters. Anything bad against Trump is fake. The man can do no wrong to his worshippers. He could be seen on camera handing Putin the nuclear codes and Mule would be talking about how great it is.


Muleman1994 - 7/13/2017 at 03:27 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:
quote:
Did anyone notice that the "impeachment" numbers came from "Public Policy Polling—a firm that does public surveys as well as polling for Democratic candidates"

Ah, the left does a poll for a political issue that the left is pushing now that informed people know their Putin/Russia/Trump "conspiracy" was crap from the beginning and amazingly the results favor their political agenda.

Y'all got played again and not surprisingly you bought it!
The little low-info voters club remains as gullible as ever.


.

Obstruction of justice. Violation of the emoluments law. Having illegal dealings with a foreign government. Treason.

And still, you cannot provide any links at any time. You need to shut up.


All lies. Every one of the corrupt liberal media's lies are attributed to "unnamed sources" and not one of them have ever produced proof or documentation of anything.

But of course you are so f*cking stupid you don't know when you are being played.






Watch the news. All of the news, not just Fox.

[Edited on 7/10/2017 by jkeller]


I do watch the news.
Actual news not the fake news that the corrupt liberal media spews and feeds your weak mind.
You and pops are easily the most uninformed here in the W/P.

No impeachment proceedings against President Trump will ever be considered by The House.


BoytonBrother - 7/13/2017 at 07:20 PM

Trump intentionally speaks at an elementary level to appeal to all the stupid Americans.

[Edited on 7/13/2017 by BoytonBrother]


BrerRabbit - 7/13/2017 at 09:54 PM

quote:
I do watch the news.
Actual news not the fake news that the corrupt liberal media spews and feeds your weak mind.


Which news do you recommend?


This thread come from : Hittin' The Web with the Allman Brothers Band
http://allmanbrothersband.com/

Url of this website:
http://allmanbrothersband.com//modules.php?op=modload&name=XForum&file=viewthread&fid=127&tid=144684